Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENM0703 Course Outline T1 2019
GENM0703 Course Outline T1 2019
GENM0703
Concepts of
Physical Activity,
Exercise and Health
COURSE OUTLINE
Term 1, 2019
Tel: +61 (2) 9385 1699 Fax: +61 (2) 9313 6185
Email: postgrad-sphcm@unsw.edu.au (yes, even for this undergraduate course)
© 2019. The School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales. CRICOS Provider
No: 00098G. Previously published material in this book is copied on behalf of the University of New South Wales
pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act as amended.
Contents
Course Outline
Welcome and course overview 1
Learning and teaching rationale 3
Assessment 4
Academic honesty and plagiarism 18
Readings and resources 20
Continual course improvement 21
Additional support to students 21
Course schedule 23
There is confusing information in our modern world regarding physical activity and health.
This course uses evidence-based medicine to explain physical activity-related subjects
using the latest scientific evidence. Some topics covered include: the physiology of
movement, effects of physical activity on the body, physical activity public health,
physical activity requirements and needs for different population groups, and use of
technology.
You will be encouraged to look at your movement habits - and those of the wider public - in
a new way that will hopefully improve your health (and that of your loved ones), now and in
the years to come.
Exclusions: None
Pre-requisites: None
Course convenor
Rebecca Reynolds
Ph: 02 9385 2522
Email: rebecca.reynolds@unsw.edu.au
Website: https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/dr-rebecca-reynolds
Term dates
Term 1 Lectures: Tuesdays 905-955AM, Mathews Theatre B, weeks 1-10
Tutorials: Tuesdays various times for 1.5h, various Mathews
Building rooms, weeks 1-10
Timetable https://sphcm.med.unsw.edu.au/current-students/general-
education/timetables
Course aim
To provide students with knowledge of physical activity and other lifestyle habits,
understanding of the effects of lifestyle on health and ideas and tools for positive
change on both a personal and public health level.
Course outcomes
1. Define the basic structure and function of the moving human body.
2. Explain how regular physical activity affects health and disease.
3. Recognise that physical activity requirements differ between population groups.
4. Determine factors affecting population physical activity habits in modern Australia.
5. Apply physical activity information to your own lifestyle.
6. Demonstrate scientific skills relating to scientific evidence, and collaborative and
oral work.
Teaching strategies
All SPHCM courses use Moodle to some extent. The Moodle component of your course
is like a mini-website that holds the key resources for your course, provides online
discussion areas and a place for you to submit assignments online. If you are unfamiliar
with Moodle please visit: https://student.unsw.edu.au/moodle-support
This course is taught partially online, with 2.5 hours of indicative contact per week.
There is a 1-hour lecture each week and preparation lessons to watch online before each
lecture. The lectures are designed to be as informative, entertaining and interactive as
possible. The lectures are ideally attended in-person, partly because fun group physical
activities are organised (e.g. beach/lecture ball). However, the lectures are recorded both
visually and aurally (via Moodle), so students can opt to catch-up on lectures online
There is also a 1.5-hour tutorial each week. The tutorials are designed to encourage
participation in group activities and guided analysis of your - and the wider world’s -
physical activity habits. The in-person tutorials are monitored for attendance. As per
university policy, a minimum of 80% attendance is required. That is, out of the 10
tutorials, you can only miss a maximum of 2. If you miss more than 2, you must contact
your tutor as soon as possible to discuss your situation and/or provide documentation
explaining your absence, such as a medical certificate. Failure to do so will result in your
final assessment being refused. Doors to tutorials will be closed 15 minutes after class
begins and late attendance will be recorded as an absence.
Assessment
Summary
• You will be assessed on your understanding of the course content each week
(preparation materials for lectures, lectures and tutorials).
• Each question is worth 0.2%, therefore each quiz is worth 2%, and in total the
quizzes are worth 20%
• Quizzes will open at the end of each Tuesday’s teaching (Tuesday 230PM) and
close before the following week’s teaching (Tuesday 9AM). See the course
schedule on the last page of this course outline for exact dates.
• You will be assessed on the accuracy of your answers, and will be given grades
out of 2% and answers to the quiz questions via Moodle.
Task description
• You will start a lifestyle change program focusing on your physical activity levels. You will monitor your progress and write a reflective piece
documenting the process and discussing the outcomes. More details will be given during a tutorial.
• You will be marked by an academic and will be given a grade out of 20% and written feedback via Moodle’s Turnitin function.
• Learning outcomes assessed: 2-6, particularly 5.
Assessment rubric
Total (/20) High distinction (≥85%) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
Student displays an Student displays a Student displays an Student describes a basic Student demonstrates
outstanding ability to thorough ability to adequate ability to knowledge and limited knowledge and
describe and explain describe and explain describe and explain understanding of the understanding of the
causes and effects of their causes and effects of causes and effects of causes and effects of causes and effects of their
lifestyle habits. There is their lifestyle habits. their lifestyle habits. their lifestyle habits. lifestyle habits. There is
Overall clear and consistent There is good There is some There is limited no demonstration of
demonstration of critical demonstration of critical demonstration of critical demonstration of critical critical thought and there
thought which is supported thought which is thought with a small thought with minimal is an absence of reliable
by an extensive range of supported by a range of amount of reliable reliable supporting supporting scientific
reliable scientific evidence. reliable scientific supporting scientific scientific evidence. evidence.
evidence. evidence.
Total (/20) High distinction (≥85%) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
Content Content is relevant and Content is mostly relevant Adequate relevant Little relevant content; Inadequate or lacking
(/3) concisely written with and concisely written with content; relatively limited concise writing; relevant content; absence
excellent demonstration of demonstration of scientific concisely written; limited use of scientific of concise writing; poor
scientific terminology. terminology. adequate use of scientific terminology. use of scientific
terminology. terminology.
Understanding Excellent understanding Good understanding Adequate understanding Limited understanding Lack of understanding or
(/10) demonstrated; outstanding demonstrated; good demonstrated; some demonstrated; limited factual inaccuracies; no
critical thinking of inter- critical thinking of inter- critical thinking of inter- critical thinking of inter- critical thinking of inter-
relationship between relationship between relationship between relationship between relationship between
physical activity and physical activity and physical activity and physical activity and physical activity and
lifestyle behaviours; lifestyle behaviours; good lifestyle behaviours; some lifestyle behaviours; lifestyle behaviours; no
extensive comparison with comparison with comparison with minimal comparison with comparison with
population habits and population habits and population habits and population habits and population habits and
guidelines. guidelines. guidelines. guidelines. guidelines.
Evidence and Clear demonstration of Some evidence of wider Minimum number of Minimal reliable scientific Largely absent reliable
referencing wider reading and inclusion reading and inclusion of reliable scientific evidence evidence; poor scientific evidence;
(/5) of additional extensive additional reliable used; good attempt at referencing. inappropriate or lack of
reliable scientific evidence scientific evidence correct referencing. correct referencing.
beyond the minimum; beyond the minimum;
correct referencing. correct referencing.
Overall quality Excellent presentation; Clear presentation; report Adequate presentation; Poor presentation; report Unsatisfactory
(/2) report is very succinctly is cohesive and succinct report is mostly cohesive is not cohesive or presentation; report is not
written and logically; with good flow; and succinct; succinct; is confusing; cohesive or succinct; is
excellent academic writing demonstrates very good demonstrates good demonstrates limited confusing; demonstrates
demonstrated. academic writing. academic writing. academic writing. poor academic writing.
Task description
• In groups, you will present on an aspect of physical activity. You will be given more details and guidance in a tutorial.
• You will be marked by your tutor only and will receive an individual performance mark (worth 15%), a group performance mark (worth 5%) and written
feedback; all through Moodle.
Assessment rubric
A3: group presentation assessment criteria - for individual performance mark
Total (/15) High distinction (≥85%) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
Overall Student displays an Student displays a Student displays an Student displays a basic Student demonstrates
outstanding ability to thorough ability to adequate ability to knowledge of the topic, limited knowledge and
describe and explain the describe and explain the describe and explain the showing little understanding of the
chosen topic, showing chosen topic, showing a topic, demonstrating a understanding; minimal topic. There is minimal
extensive knowledge and moderate amount good knowledge and reliable supporting knowledge and reliable
supporting their work knowledge and supporting their work evidence. supporting evidence
with reliable scientific supporting their work with some reliable shown.
evidence. scientific evidence.
Total (/15) High distinction (≥85%) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
with reliable scientific
evidence.
Content and Content is relevant and Content is relevant and Content is relevant and Content is generally Content is not relevant
understanding understanding of topic is understanding of topic is understanding of topic is relevant but there is or is factually incorrect;
(/10) exceptionally well demonstrated; some reasonably limited understanding limited understanding
demonstrated; extensive critical analysis shown. demonstrated; minimal demonstrated; no critical demonstrated; no
(marks will be critical analysis shown. critical analysis shown. analysis shown. critical analysis shown.
deducted here for an
individual speaker
going over time, i.e.
over 3m18s)
Evidence and Excellent demonstration Some demonstration of Minimum amount of Little reliable scientific Absence of reliable
referencing of wider reading and wider reading and reliable scientific evidence; an attempt at scientific evidence or
(/3) inclusion of additional inclusion of additional evidence; referencing is correct referencing is irrelevant evidence
reliable scientific reliable scientific largely correct. made. used; correct
evidence beyond the evidence beyond the referencing is absent.
minimum; referencing is minimum; referencing is
correct. correct.
Presentation skills Pace, audibility, Pace, audibility, Pace, audibility, Pace, audibility, Poor pace, audibility,
(/2) confidence, and energy confidence, and energy confidence, and energy confidence, and energy confidence, and
are excellent; visual aids are good; visual aids are are adequate; some use are satisfactory; minimal energy; no visual aids.
are appropriate and appropriate and useful. of visual aids use of visual aids.
useful.
Task description
Step 1: calibration and submit proof paper – both due Friday 12 April 9AM
• Calibration involves you marking a sample proof capstone paper, so that Moodle can work out how ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ you are when you
mark. The result of this will be taken into account when you are marking two peers’ proof capstone papers (see below). You will be
provided with more detailed instructions on how to do this nearer the time of the assessment.
• Submitting your proof paper – you will be required to submit a ‘near-final’, or ‘proof’, version of your capstone paper. That is, the paper
needs to be pretty-much-finished; containing the full word count, any images and complete reference list. Your paper should also not
have your name on it anywhere, as peer marking is an anonymous process (see below).
Step 2: mark two of your peers’ proof capstone papers – due Tuesday 16 April 9AM
• This step will occur within the same workshop activity in Moodle as for step 1 above.
• You will be randomly allocated two of your peers’ proof capstone papers to peer mark. You will be provided with more detailed
instructions on how to do this nearer the time of the assessment.
• This process is anonymous, so please don’t list your name on your paper.
• This step will also give you a grade out of 10%, as well as feedback from the two peers that were assigned to mark your proof capstone
paper.
Step 3: improve your proof capstone paper based on peer feedback and submit your final capstone paper – final paper is due
Friday 19 April 9AM
You may choose to incorporate some of the suggestions from your peers (from step 2 above) into your proof capstone paper in an attempt to
improve it, before you submit it as a final version. You also may not change the paper from its proof stage to final stage. Up to you!
Assessment rubric
A4: capstone paper assessment criteria – for peer mark on proof capstone paper
High distinction
Total (/10) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
(≥85%)
Content and All relevant content All relevant content Some relevant content Minimal relevant Absence of relevant
understanding (/7) included; excellent use included; good use of included; good use of content included; poor content or factual
of scientific scientific terminology; scientific terminology; use of scientific inaccuracies included;
terminology; extensive moderate amount of some critical analysis terminology; poor use of scientific
critical analysis critical analysis demonstrated. 4.6-5.2 descriptive report with terminology;
demonstrated. 6+ demonstrated. 5.3-5.9 no critical analysis descriptive report with
demonstrated. 3.5-4.5 no critical analysis
demonstrated. <3.5
Evidence and Clear demonstration of Some evidence of Minimum number of Minimal reliable Largely absent reliable
referencing wider reading and wider reading and reliable scientific scientific evidence; scientific evidence;
(/2) inclusion of additional inclusion of additional evidence used; good poor referencing. 1.0- inappropriate or lack of
extensive reliable reliable scientific attempt at correct 1.2 correct referencing.
scientific evidence evidence beyond the referencing. 1.3-1.4 <1.0
beyond the minimum; minimum; correct
correct referencing. referencing. 1.5-1.6
1.7+
Overall quality Excellent presentation; Clear presentation; Adequate presentation; Poor presentation; Unsatisfactory
(/1) report is very report is cohesive and report is mostly report is not cohesive presentation; report is
succinctly written and succinct with good cohesive and succinct; or succinct; is not cohesive or
logically; excellent flow; demonstrates demonstrates good confusing; succinct; is confusing;
academic writing very good academic academic writing. 0.7 demonstrates limited demonstrates poor
demonstrated. 0.9+ writing. 0.8 academic writing. 0.5- academic writing. <0.5
0.6
A4: capstone paper assessment criteria – for mark on final capstone paper
High distinction
Total (/30) Distinction (75−84%) Credit (65−74%) Pass (50−64%) Fail (<50%)
(≥85%)
Overall Student displays an Student displays a Student displays a Student demonstrates a Student demonstrates
outstanding ability to thorough ability to proficient ability to basic knowledge and limited knowledge and
describe and explain the describe and explain the describe and explain the understanding of the understanding of the
topic, showing excellent topic, showing a topic, showing minimal topic, no critical analysis topic. There is no critical
critical analysis and moderate amount critical analysis and demonstrated with little analysis and reliable
supporting their work critical analysis and supporting their work reliable supporting supporting evidence is
with extensive reliable supporting their work with some reliable evidence. not used.
scientific evidence. with reliable scientific scientific evidence.
evidence.
Content and All relevant content All relevant content Some relevant content Minimal relevant content Absence of relevant
understanding (/21) included; excellent use included; good use of included; good use of included; poor use of content or factual
of scientific terminology; scientific terminology; scientific terminology; scientific terminology; inaccuracies included;
extensive critical moderate amount of some critical analysis descriptive report with poor use of scientific
analysis demonstrated. critical analysis demonstrated. no critical analysis terminology; descriptive
demonstrated. demonstrated. report with no critical
analysis demonstrated.
Evidence and Clear demonstration of Some evidence of wider Minimum number of Minimal reliable Largely absent reliable
referencing wider reading and reading and inclusion of reliable scientific scientific evidence; poor scientific evidence;
(/6) inclusion of additional additional reliable evidence used; good referencing. inappropriate or lack of
extensive reliable scientific evidence attempt at correct correct referencing.
scientific evidence beyond the minimum; referencing.
beyond the minimum; correct referencing.
correct referencing.
Overall quality Excellent presentation; Clear presentation; Adequate presentation; Poor presentation; Unsatisfactory
(/3) report is very succinctly report is cohesive and report is mostly report is not cohesive or presentation; report is
written and logically; succinct with good flow; cohesive and succinct; succinct; is confusing; not cohesive or
excellent academic demonstrates very good demonstrates good demonstrates limited succinct; is confusing;
writing demonstrated. academic writing. academic writing. academic writing. demonstrates poor
academic writing.
It is important that you adopt a critical approach to the material that you obtain for
assignments, to the required readings, and to other information with which you are
presented during the course. Think about and evaluate the material which you are
reading and which you are presenting in assignments. Attempt to cast aside your
assumptions and biases and, attempt to assess the logic and consistency of the
material in light of the supporting evidence. Wide reading on a topic facilitates this.
Referencing
It is your responsibility to make sure that you understand the Harvard academic
method for acknowledging sources of information (citing references). Failure to
reference correctly may limit marks to PS or below. Guidelines for acknowledging
sources of information can be found on the following websites:
UNSW Library: http://subjectguides.library.unsw.edu.au/elise
SPHCM: sphcm.med.unsw.edu.au/current-students/student-resources
UNSW Academic Skills and Support: https://student.unsw.edu.au/skills
3. You will need to include your student ID, course code, date and assignment title in
the header or footer on every page, and in the file name.
4. Only use your student ID to identify yourself in your assignment (DO NOT
INCLUDE YOUR NAME). All assignments submitted to the Turnitin database will
be used to determine whether other students in your course, and in the future,
have plagiarised or inappropriately included work that is not their own. Therefore,
personal details (such as your name and/or contact details which can be used to
identify you) should be removed from your papers to protect your privacy.
5. Please note, the closing time for assignments is shown in Eastern Standard Time.
Please factor this in when submitting assignments outside of NSW.
6. You are not required to submit a coversheet with your assignment. Instead, there
is a checkbox within the Turnitin submission point that you will need to tick in
order to submit your assignment. By ticking the checkbox you are confirming that
the work you are submitting is entirely original.
7. After you submit your file, Turnitin will display a digital receipt in your browser
window. If you can't see a receipt it means that you have not successfully
submitted your file. A copy of the receipt is also sent to your e-mail address. Save
the receipt and the paper ID it contains, as this is proof of a completed
submission.
Late submission
In the case of illness, misadventure or other circumstances beyond your control, you
may apply via email to the course convenor for an extension of up to 3 days. Requests
must be submitted prior to the due date and will be considered on the grounds of
illness or unforeseen events and circumstances with supporting documentation.
Feedback on assessment
You will be provided with individualised feedback on your assignment via Moodle. You
will be marked according to the marking assessment criteria listed for that specific
assessment task. The aim of any academic feedback for an assessment task is not
only to grade your work. Importantly, it is also to help you to identify your strengths and
weaknesses, and how you can improve and progress in your studies and professional
abilities.
Grades are represented by the following symbols (and corresponding range of marks):
HD (85%-100%), DN (75%-84%), CR (65%-74%), PS (50%-64%), FL (<50%)
HD This grade represents a High Distinction. This level of performance involves all of
the characteristics of a DN performance but also a level of excellence that makes
it outstanding. The level of originality, creativity, or depth of thought and
understanding shown would be higher than normally expected for students. It
demonstrates a higher order of critical thinking and reflection than that
demonstrated at the level of DN.
DN This grade represents a Distinction. This level of performance involves all of the
characteristics of a CR performance but also a level of originality, creativity, or
depth of thought and understanding. The work might involve a high level of
abstract thinking, or the ability to take an idea or an application into a new
context, understand the demands of that context and make modifications.
Specific assessment criteria relevant to this assignment are adequately
addressed and ALL aspects well done. (This distinguishes it from a CR in which
one or two aspects may be incomplete or otherwise not well done.)
CR This grade represents a Credit. The assignment or project comes together to
make a broadly coherent whole. The response answers the question, makes a
good argument, draws on appropriate evidence, and shows some selectivity and
judgment in deciding what is important and what is not. Communication is clear
and effective. Specific assessment criteria relevant to this assignment are
adequately addressed. (One or two aspects may not be well done but the overall
result is still MORE THAN satisfactory).
PS This grade represents a pass. The student has demonstrated understanding of
the basic aspects of the topic, but they may be minimally integrated and fail to
make a convincing coherent statement or argument. Written work may be
descriptive rather than analytical. It may rely too much on retelling other sources
such as texts and lecture notes, with little evidence that the student is capable of
transforming these into a personal understanding. Significant elements of the
assignment are treated superficially. Assessment criteria relevant to the
assignment are sufficiently addressed to warrant a PS however the overall
standard is no more than satisfactory.
FL This grade represents a clear fail. This grade is used when the student has
misunderstood the point of the assignment, or failed to address the most
important aspects of the topic. In other words a substantial failure, which would
need major work before it could be passed.
NOTE: Students are expected to meet UNSW standards of academic writing and in
particular must meet standards of referencing described by the Learning Centre.
Failure to reference correctly may limit marks to PS or below. Plagiarism or
collusion will result in an investigation by your Program Director and may result in
a penalty on your grades or a FL.
• Not intended to be a rigid formula for interpreting your result. The descriptive criteria
for each grade provides the basis for consistent standards within and across our
courses while still embracing academic judgement on how well you have achieved
the standard required.
• Applied to each assessment task within a course. That is, the grading policy is
used with each assessment task specified for a course. Your final grade for a
course is dependent on the combined sum of the grades across the number of
specified assessment tasks.
At UNSW plagiarism is a form of academic misconduct and is viewed very seriously. The
following notes describe what plagiarism is and where you can obtain additional
information about it. It is part of your responsibility as a student of UNSW to ensure that
you understand what plagiarism is, so that you avoid it in any of your assignments and
other academic work.
What is plagiarism?
Plagiarism is defined as using the words or ideas of others and passing them off as your
own. Plagiarism is a type of intellectual theft. It can take many forms, from deliberate
cheating to accidentally copying from a source without proper acknowledgement. UNSW
groups plagiarism into the following categories:
• Copying: Using the same or very similar words to the original text or idea without
acknowledging the source or using quotation marks. This includes copying materials,
ideas or concepts from a book, article, report or other written document,
presentation, composition, artwork, design, drawing, circuitry, computer program or
software, website, internet, other electronic resource, or another person's
assignment, without appropriate acknowledgement.
permissible to sell copies of lecture or tutorial notes as students do not own the
rights to this intellectual property.
• Inappropriate citation: Citing sources which have not been read, without
acknowledging the 'secondary' source from which knowledge of them has been
obtained.
• Self-plagiarism: ‘Self-plagiarism’ occurs where an author republishes their own
previously written work and presents it as new findings without referencing the
earlier work, either in its entirety or partially. Self-plagiarism is also referred to as
'recycling', 'duplication', or 'multiple submissions of research findings' without
disclosure. In the student context, self-plagiarism includes re-using parts of, or all of,
a body of work that has already been submitted for assessment without proper
citation.
Plagiarism varies in its extent and seriousness and procedures are in place that deal with
plagiarism through education and referral to the Learning Centre to more formal
reprimands and penalties depending on the seriousness of the plagiarism and previous
history of the student. Penalties for students found guilty of repeated plagiarism can
include a reduction in marks, failing a course, or for more serious matters, suspension or
exclusion from the University. See:
www.gs.unsw.edu.au/policy/documents/studentmisconductprocedures.pdf and
https://www.gs.unsw.edu.au/policy/documents/plagiarismprocedure.pdf
The IT Service Desk is your central point of contact for assistance and support with
UniPass, zPass, UniMail, UniWide, UNSW student email and anti-virus software.
Website: www.it.unsw.edu.au/students/index.html
Tel: +61 (2) 9385 1333
Email: itservicecentre@unsw.edu.au
Location: UNSW Library
Subject guides
Use these guides as a quick and easy pathway to locating resources in your subject
area. These excellent guides bring together the core web and print resources in one
place and provide a one click portal into the online resources.
Other matters
Course schedule/timetable (Tues = Tuesday, Feb = February, Mar = March, Apr = April, A = assessment)
Dates Lectures Tues 905-955AM, Tutorials Tues various times 1.5h (starting at Assessments A1 quizzes, A2 lifestyle change project, A3 group presentation, A4 capstone paper
Mathews Theatre B 10AM or 1130AM or 1PM), various Mathews
rooms (101, 106 or 107)
Week 1 Introduction and fundamentals Introduction and measuring physical activity A1 quiz 1 opens Tues 19 Feb 230PM
Tues 19 Feb
Week 2 Responses to physical activity Posture and balance A1 quiz 1 due Tues 26 Feb 9AM, quiz 2 opens Tues 26 Feb 230PM
Tues 26 Feb A2 details given in tutorial
Week 3 Mental health and motivation A1 quiz 2 due Tues 5 Mar 9AM, quiz 3 opens Tues 5 Mar 230PM
Tues 5 Mar
Week 4 Types of physical activity A1 quiz 3 due Tues 12 Mar 9AM, quiz 4 opens Tues 12 Mar 230PM
Tues 12 Mar A2 due Friday 15 Mar 9AM
A3 details given in tutorial
Week 5 Physical activity and chronic disease A1 quiz 4 due Tues 19 Mar 9AM, quiz 5 opens Tues 19 Mar 230PM
Tues 19 Mar A4 details given in tutorial
Week 6 Sedentarism and technology A1 quiz 5 due Tues 26 Mar 9AM, quiz 6 opens Tues 26 Mar 230PM
Tues 26 Mar
Week 7 Athletes A1 quiz 6 due Tues 2 Apr 9AM, quiz 7 opens Tues 2 Apr 230PM
Tues 2 Apr
Week 8 Metabolism and body weight A1 quiz 7 due Tues 9 Apr 9AM, quiz 8 opens Tues 9 Apr 230PM
Tues 9 Apr A3 presentation file due Tues 9 Apr 9AM and group presentations during tutorial
A4 calibration and proof paper due Friday 12 Apr 9AM
Week 9 Life stages A1 quiz 8 due Tues 16 Apr 9AM, quiz 9 opens Tues 16 Apr 230PM
Tues 16 Apr A3 group presentations during tutorial
A4 peer review due Tues 16 Apr 9AM and final paper due Friday 19 Apr 9AM
Week 10 Fitness trends A1 quiz 9 due Tues 23 Apr 9AM, quiz 10 opens Tues 23 Apr 230PM
Tues 23 Apr A3 group presentations during tutorial