Pila

You might also like

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

International law - body of legal rules which apply • It is possible for the principles of ML to

betweensoverign state and such other entities as become part of IL


have been granted international personality-
Schwarzenberger • IL also becomes part of many municipal laws
– ex. Article II of Phil. Constitution
Grand divisions of international law
Doctrine of transformation-IL should first be
1. Law of peace-governs the normal relation of enacted as ML to be binding in a state
states
Thus, BASIC RULE: it is always presumed that IL is
2. Law of war-governs states at war always enacted by each state as part of their ML and
never in defiance with the principles of IL
3. Law of neutrality-governs the relations of
CONSTITUTION VS. TREATY
states at war and states not involved in the
war Phil-Constitution prevails

MUNICIPAL LAW vs. INTERNATIONAL LAW Consti appoints SC to decide on matters of


agreements, treaties, etc. (Art. VIII, Sec 5(2))
MONISTS DUALISTS
Believed in the oneness Dichotomy of law BASIS OF IL
of all law
The essential identity of Municipal law is issued
NATURALIST POSITIVIST ECLETICS
ML and IL is because by a superior for
some of the fundamental observance of those Law of nature- Agreement of Both law of
notions of IL cannot be under its authority; IL is basis; a higher states-binding nature and
comprehended without not imposed but adopted law; rule of force agreement
the assumption of a by states as a common human conduct as the basis
superior legal order from rule of action among independent and
which the various themselves. always binding
systems of ML are Thus, IL as the weaker Collective will of Law of Based on the
derived by way of law the state, thus coordination not “dictate of
delegation becomes bound law of reason” and
In both, law is essentially ML consists of by the law of subordination “practice of
a command binding upon enactments from law nature states”
the subjects making authorities; IL IL viewed not in Consent of state Should be
independently upon their derived not only from between but of respondibility compromised
will legislation but from other above states is expressed in but in case of
sources i.e. intl customs, the case of conflicts, law
conventions and general customary law, of nature
principles of law implied in prevails as
Law regulates the ML regulates the customary law the
conduct of individuals relations among the and presumed fundamental
individuals and to their in general law
own state; IL regulates principles of law
the relations of the states
to other international
persons.
Violations:
ML-admin and judicial Grotius- father of international law
processes
IL-state to state
transactions Reasons why states are compelled to
Breaches of ML entails abide by IL:
only individual
responsibility; breaches 1. Compulsive force of reciprocal
of IL collective
responsibility advantage and fear of
retaliation
2. Common belief that observance intellectual interests with universal
would redound to the welfare recognition
of the whole society
SOURCES of IL
3. Desire to project a desirable
image and maintain goodwill Primary
to the family of nations. 1. Treaties – if of the same
4. Machinery of UN nature, uniform provisions,
substantial number of states
Enforcement of IL:
GENERAL LAW: treaty should
1. International Organizations, include sizeable number of states
special arbitral tribunals ex. UN and reflect the will or at least the
SC and ICJ consensus of states

2. Diplomatic methods or war 2. Customs – practice grown up


by states and has become
3. IL as part of states’ ML accepted as binding because of
Functions of IL: persistent usage over a long
period of time
1. Establish peace and order

2. Avoidance of the employment


of force in international 3. General principles of law –
relations derived from the law of nature
and observed by majority
3. Encourage and ensure because they are believed to be
cooperation among states in good and just
solving common problems.

International Morality – govern the


relations through conscience, morality Secondary
and justice 1. Jurisprudence – only
International Comity- rules of persuasive; stare decisis
courtesy among states does not apply

International diplomacy – objects of 2. Writings of publicists –


national and international policy and fair and unbiased
conduct of foreign affairs and relations representation; by an
acknowledged authority
International administrative law-
regulate the relations and activities of CHAPTER III – THE INTERNATIONAL
national and international agencies COMMUNITY
with respect to material and Subject vs. Object
Subject – directly asserts rights and 1. Real union – two or more
be held directly liable states under one authority;
single international person
Object- rights and responsibilities are
indirect 2. Federal union – two or more
states but upon merging
STATE – group of people living ceased to be states, ex. US
together in a definite territory under
an independent government organized 3. Confederation – organization
for political end and capable of of states, maintaining
entering into international relations internal sovereignty and
assigning limited
ELEMENTS: PETER SOGO representation to the central
1. People -human beings living body, ie., german empire
within the territory 4. Personal Union – one or
2. Territory – fixed portion of the more independent states
surface of the earth where under one monarch, who
people of the state reside does not become an intl
person
3. Government - Agency through
which the will Is formulated, 5. Incorporate union – both
expressed and realized external and internal affairs
are controlled by the central
4. Sovereignty - power to direct authority
its own external affairs w/o
interference from other states Neutralized States – states enter into
an agreement by virtue of preventing
CAPACITY OF STATES war

• Discharge of international Dependent States – two categories:


obligations
1. Protectorate – retains greater
• Establish international law measure on its external affairs

CLASSIFICATION OF STATES 2. Suzerainty

Independent States – freedom in


internal and external affairs

a. Simple states – under a single


and central government

b. Composite states – two or more


states, each with own
government but under central
authority

You might also like