Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WK 6 Safety & Health Issues
WK 6 Safety & Health Issues
Engineering µe
EMT342
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS
Asoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Mohd Khairudddin Md Arshad
School of Microelectronic Engineering,
Institute of Nano Electronic Engineering,
Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP)
Perlis, Malaysia
IMPLICATION
QUALITATIVE MORAL & ETHIC
RISK MANAGEMENT AND
SAFETY FINANCIAL
RISK ASSESSMENT SAFETY CULTURE
COSTS
QUANTITATIVE H.I.R.A.R.C - TOOL
ACTS
STEPS IN HIRARC
https://www.dosh.gov.my/index.php/legislation/acts-legislation
For high risk industries (i.e. construction, ship building, gas etc.)
>100 Employees - Safety & Health Policy + Safety & Health Committee + a
(Order 1997) Certified Safety & Health Officer
For low risk industries (other than the above mentioned industries)
>500 Employees -Safety & Health Policy + Safety & Health Committee +
(Order 1997) a Certified Safety & Health Officer
Milestones in the Safety Movement
1890 Boiler Enactment 1890. 1st legislation in the country to address safety issues. Mandatory inspections of
boilers by the Mines Department inspectors.
1913-Machinery Ordinance 1913. Superseded all the Boiler Enactment.
1932-Machinery Enactment 1932. Updated. Addition on provision on registration and inspection of
machinery installation. Enforced by Dept. of Mines.
1953-Machinery Ordinance 1953. Superseded all previous Regulations. 4 Regulations were enacted, one
was Safety and Health and Fire 1953; Enforced by Dept of Machinery, Min of Labor.
1967-Factory and Machinery Act 1967. Superseded Machinery Ordinance 1953. Fill the gaps, cover all aspects
on industry – safety and health in all work place defined as factories (before, people worked in
workplace where there was no machinery were unprotected). BUT work force under agriculture,
forestry, fishing, construction, finance and public services not protected. Enforced by Factory and
Machinery Dept.
1970-Regulations.
1991-Bright Sparklers factory explosion in Sungai Buluh killed 22 workers. Stiffer penalties to employers failed
to safeguard workers. {Bhopal tragedy in India 1984 (3000 killed, 50,000 suffered disability and Chernobyl
nuclear power disaster in Russia 1986}.
1994-Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). To meet Malaysian fast economic growth to become an
industrialized state by 2020 . Plug the weakness of 1967 Act. Provide general guidelines how to
create a safe environment at work. All protected. Except those working on board ships (Merchant
Shipping Ordinance 1952, Merchant Shipping Ordinance (Sabah & Sarawak) 1960.
Lessons Learnt from Bhopal tragedy (1984)?
40 tons of methyl isocyanides (MIC) and other lethal gases including hydrogen
cyanide leaked. Morning of 3rd December 1984.
Protective equipment – that could stop the disaster not in full working order
Supreme Court India ordered USD470 compensation. The fund were paid to
Indian Government to compensate the victims.
Criminal negligence
Corporate prejudice – chose a poverty-stricken country as a location that few
would care if something went wrong
Legal Issues (MACHINERY AND FACTORY ACT 1967; OSH ACT 1994
• Claims for compensation
• Disruption during the legal process
Financial Issues - is not a JUST legal, moral and ethical obligation; it also
makes good business sense!!!!!.
• Increase of Insurance Premium
• Direct Lost
• Indirect Lost
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER OSHA 1994
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND
HEALTH ACT 0F
1994
Objectives of the Act
a) to secure the safety, health and welfare of persons at work against risks to
safety or health arising out of the activities of persons at work;
b) to protect persons at a place of work other than persons at work against risks
to safety or health arising out of the activities of persons at work;
c) to promote an occupational environment for persons at work which is adapted
to their physiological and psychological needs;
d) to provide the means whereby the associated occupational safety and health
legislations may be progressively replaced by a system of regulations and
approved industry codes of practice operating in combination with the
provisions of this Act designed to maintain or improve the standards of safety
and health.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER OSHA 1994
Do you know that it is the duty of our EMPLOYER under the Occupational Safety
and Health Act 0f 1994 to:
§ the provision and maintenance of plant and systems of work that are safe
and without risks to health;
§ making of arrangements for ensuring safety and absence of risks to
health in connection with the use or operation, handling, storage and
transport of plant and substances;
§ the provision of such information, instruction, training and supervision as
is necessary to ensure the safety and health at work;
§ maintaining the workplace in a condition that is safe and without risks to
health and the provision and maintenance of the means of access to and
egress from it that are safe and without such risks;
§ the provision and maintenance of a working environment which is safe,
without risks to health and adequate as regards to facilities for our welfare
at work.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS UNDER OSHA 1994
FACTORY AND
MACHINERY ACT, 1967
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
12 . Lifting of weights
No person shall be employed to lift, carry or move any load so heavy
as to be likely to cause injury to him
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
14 . Construction of machinery
All machinery and every part thereof including all fittings and attachment
shall be of sound construction and sound material free from defect
and suitable for the purpose and shall be properly maintained
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
(2) No person shall import any machinery other than transmission machinery
which does not comply with any regulations made under this Act applicable
to such machinery.
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
(6) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and
shall, on conviction, be liable to a fine not exceeding one hundred and fifty thousand
ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both.
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
(a) every factory shall be kept in a clean state and free from offensive effluvia
arising from any drain, sanitary convenience or other source …
(b) the maximum number of persons employed at any one time in any work-
room in any factory shall be such that the amount of cubic feet of space and
superficial feet of floor area allowed in the work-room for each person are not
less than the amount of cubic feet of space and superficial feet of floor area
prescribed either generally or for the particular class of work carried on in the
work-room
And so on….up to 3.
FACTORY AND MACHINERY ACT, 1967
This has resulted in a much better integrated health and safety management system that
increases the opportunity to identify and manage all corporate risks, and a much more open
culture, improving reporting and monitoring. The board actively promotes a culture that
gives staff the confidence to report incidents.
The company had an excellent safety record and had no indication of the devastating
events that were to happen – in one year three deaths occurred. Although health
and safety had always been a business priority, a change in focus was needed to
achieve behavioural change. This included:
ü the CEO assigning health and safety responsibilities to all directors, and
monthly reports go to the board;
ü creating effective working partnerships with employees, trade unions and
others;
ü overseeing a behavioral change programme and audits;
ü publishing annual health and safety targets, and devising initiatives to meet
them.
Results include:
• time lost to injuries reduced by 43% over a two year period;
• 63% reduction in major issues over the course of a year;
• much greater understanding by directors of health and safety risks.
Case study – Mid and West Wales Fire and
Rescue Service
To give health and safety a high priority, Mid and West Wales Fire and Rescue Service
recognized that it was critical for its leadership to demonstrate to its staff that accountability
for health and safety was a fundamental element in the success of its overall service delivery.
The director of service policy and planning was nominated as the health and safety
director for the service in order to clearly define the importance this subject held within the
organisation. The director implemented a revised health and safety framework, which
included a programme of fire station visits to engage the workforce, and placed a
renewed emphasis on improving incident reporting, investigation and monitoring
procedures.
An external health and safety audit identified a need to develop a unified approach, and
also recommended more direction from the board, to develop an effective strategy.
The result was a radical revision of the company's approach, including:
the group human resources director creating a health and safety vision, supported
by a plan with targets over three years;
training on health and safety responsibilities was introduced for all board
directors.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/leadership/casestudies-success.htm
THE GOAL OF SAFETY AND HEALTH
PROGRAM IN WORK PLACE IS TO
ESTABLISH SAFE WORK
ENVIRONMENT
Safety and Health – How it Evolves
§ PREVIOUSLY, EMPLOYERS NOT CONCERN FOR SAFETY OF
WORKERS & IN FACT LITTLE INCENTIVE TO BE
CONCERNED. SAFETY PROGRAMS WERE IN FACT NON-
EXISTENT.
• Injury
• Diseases
• Damage to equipment or structures
• Loss of material or lessening of the ability to perform a
prescribed function
• Damage to the environment
• Or a combination of the above