Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Portrayal of Stereotyping and Prejudice in Pleasantville
The Portrayal of Stereotyping and Prejudice in Pleasantville
The Portrayal of Stereotyping and Prejudice in Pleasantville
Pleasantville was directed by Gary Ross in 1998 as a social satire. There are two teenagers, Jennifer
and David, who are brought from the 1990s to a black and white sitcom in the “Pleasantville”, a land of
Utopian world. They were incorporated into the sitcom in Pleasantville which introduced their new way
of thought. It spreads shift in the form of color through their culture. Throughout this film, the concept
of utopia and civilization are mocked, as racial injustice, prejudice, and racism are exposed throughout
this film. Satire is described as an artistic genre in which fools, vices, and shortcomings are mocked with
the intention of shame the subject, and indeed the object of improvements. Various ways of looking at
social issues and philosophies are used, including exaggeration, incongruity, a reversal of roles, and
irony.
The portrayal of images of stereotyping in Pleasantville 's aims is to raise awareness of the past
social fears of racial integration in the United States and how colored people were treated. Before
Jennifer and David arrive, Pleasantville is a very routine place. Routine is equal to perfection and order.
Change, caused by Jennifer's and David's literal inconsistency in the fifties, causes change and chaos. As
Pleasantville residents begin to find where their passion lies, they get colored. True citizens consider the
“colored”, because they differ from the standard, to be corrupt. “True Pleasantville Citizens” have a
town meeting to discuss changes where all the colored people that want to participate are segregated and
placed in their section. At the conference, they discuss how to avoid additional “color” in the
community. The idea that the white people were the true Americans, not the colored people, is parallel
to History. Ross explored that black people experienced segregation in the 1950s and lots of things, like
bus seats, hospitals, and schools were excluded from them. He ridicules the white Americans in the 50s
and how ridiculous it was to hate someone with a different color of the skin because it is racism: to
repress others whom we are “fearing” for being different; and to impose our own prejudices upon
another. Briefly, in the 1950s, Pleasantville uses irony to portray “colored” people (Fisle & Taylor,
2008).
Often in different mediums, the 1950s are perfectly depicted. In its perfect company, Pleasantville is
filled with only black and white people. The film draws similarities among people living in Utopia in the
'50s, where they have no concepts of knowledge, sex, or the lower race of 'colored people' that are
largely ignorant of social vices. Originally, everything, everyone in white and black, is locked, has
simple rules and rituals in society, rarely gets out of control to prevent social turmoil and to maintain
“There was no strife; it was a kinder, gentler time. And all these bromides always evoked how
America used to be so happy and well-adjusted and mighty and potent, and all those things”
(Ross 1998)
Pleasantville uses comparisons and analogies to ridicule the false innocence and values depicted by
so many in the 1950s, the way nostalgia provides a never-existing world, and how looking back on the
so-called simplicity of that era is not a solution to the problems of today. Ross says that no right family
or way of living exists and that it is a waste of time trying to comply with an ideal or a stereotype.
Pleasantville threatens the idealistic world. There can and will not exist in the perfect world. This
Therefore, throughout the film, Pleasantville, social satire, and its devices, many social challenges
are being explored. Racism and the treatment of people with color, by incongruity and analogy, were
integral problems examined in Pleasantville in the 1950s. By comparison, it mocked our ideas for
perfection. The stereotypical mentality of the 1950s towards the role of women was often ridiculed with
the use of hyperbole, satire, and irony. Pleasantville uses satire to comment upon numerous still
important social issues today by drawing comparisons between the problems in Pleasantville and the
Works Cited
Fiske, S. T, & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition (2nd ed). New York: McGraw Hill.