Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cultivation Theory Definition and Origins
Cultivation Theory Definition and Origins
Home
Cultivation Theory
By Cynthia Vinney
Updated October 23, 2019
Cultivation theory proposes that repeated exposure to media over time influences
perceptions of social reality. Originated by George Gerbner in the 1960s, this theory is most
frequently applied to television viewing and suggests that frequent television viewers’
perceptions of the real world become reflective of the most common messages advanced by
fictional television.
Gerbner proposed that over time, repeated exposure to media cultivated the belief that the
messages conveyed by the media apply to the real world. As people’s perceptions are
shaped by media exposure, their beliefs, values, and attitudes are shaped as well.
https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print 1/4
9/14/2020 https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print
When Gerbner originally conceived of cultivation theory, it was part of a broader “cultural
indicators” project. The project pointed to three areas of analysis: institutional process
analysis, which explored how media messages are formulated and distributed; message
system analysis, which explored what those messages conveyed as a whole; and cultivation
analysis, which explored how media messages impact the way the consumers of media
messages perceive the real world. While all three components are linked, it is cultivation
analysis that was and continues to be most widely researched by scholars.
As his assumptions about television indicate, Gerbner wasn’t interested in the impact of any
one message or individual viewers’ perceptions of those messages. He wanted to
understand how the broad pattern of television messages impact public knowledge and
influence collective perceptions.
Research showed that lighter television viewers were more trusting and saw the world as
less selfish and dangerous than heavy television viewers. This phenomenon is called the
“mean world syndrome.”
https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print 2/4
9/14/2020 https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print
message conveyed on television. For example, television messages about violence are likely
to be especially resonant to an individual who lives in a city with a high crime rate. Between
the television message and the real-life crime rate, cultivation effects will be amplified,
enhancing the belief that the world is a mean and scary place.
Research
While Gerbner focused his research on fictional television, more recently, scholars have
expanded cultivation research into additional media, including video games, and different
forms of television, like reality TV. In addition, the topics explored in cultivation research
continue to expand. Studies have included the impact of media on perceptions of family, sex
roles, sexuality, aging, mental health, the environment, science, minorities, and numerous
other areas.
For example, one recent study explored the way heavy viewers of the reality TV shows 16
and Pregnant and Teen Mom perceive teenage parenthood. The researchers discovered that
despite the shows’ creators' belief that the programs would help prevent teen pregnancy,
heavy viewers' perceptions were very different. Heavy viewers of these shows believed that
teenage mothers had “an enviable quality of life, a high income, and involved fathers.”
Another study found that television cultivates materialism and, as a result, people who watch
more TV are less concerned about the environment. Meanwhile, a third study found that
general television viewing cultivated skepticism about science. However, because science is
also sometimes portrayed as a cure-all on television, a competing perception of science as
promising was also cultivated.
These studies are just the tip of the iceberg. Cultivation continues to be a widely studied area
for mass communication and media psychology researchers.
Critiques
Despite the ongoing popularity of cultivation theory among researchers and the research
evidence supporting the theory, cultivation has been criticized for several reasons. For
instance, some media scholars take issue with cultivation because it treats media consumers
as fundamentally passive. By focusing on the patterns of media messages instead of
individual responses to those messages, cultivation ignores actual behavior.
In addition, the cultivation research by Gerbner and his colleagues is criticized for looking at
television in aggregate without any concern about differences between various genres or
shows. This singular focus came from cultivation's concern with the pattern of messages
across television and not the individual messages of specific genres or shows. Nonetheless,
recently some scholars have investigated the way specific genres influence heavy viewers.
Sources
https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print 3/4
9/14/2020 https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print
Gerbner, George. “Cultivation Analysis: An Overview.” Mass Communication & Society, vol. 1, no. 3-
4, 1998, pp. 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1998.9677855
Gerbner, George. “Toward ‘Cultural Indicators’: The Analysis of Mass Mediated Public Message
Systems." AV Communication Review, vol. 17, no. 2,1969, pp. 137-148.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02769102
Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. “The ‘Mainstreaming’ of
America: Violence Profile No. 11.” Journal of Communication, vol. 30, no. 3, 1980, pp. 10-29.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.x
Good, Jennifer. “Shop ‘til We Drop? Television, Materialism, and Attitudes About the Natural
Environment.” Mass Communication & Society, vol. 10, no. 3, 2007, pp. 365-383.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430701407165
Martins, Nicole and Robin E. Jensen. “The Relationship Between ‘Teen Mom’ Reality Programming
and Teenagers’ Beliefs About Teen Parenthood.” Mass Communication & Society, vol. 17, no. 6,
2014, pp. 830-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.851701
Morgan, Michael, and James Shanahan. “The State of Cultivation.” Journal of Broadcasting &
Electronic Media, vol. 54, no. 2, 2010, pp. 337-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151003735018
Nisbet, Matthew C., Dietram A. Scheufele, James Shanahan, Patricia Moy, Dominique Brossard,
and Bruce V. Lewenstein. “Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? A Media Effects Model for Public
Perceptions of Science and Technology.” Communication Research, vol. 29, no. 5, 2002, pp. 584-
608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
Shrum, L. J. “Cultivation Theory: Effects and Underlying Processes.” The International Encyclopedia
of Media Effects, edited by Patrick Rossler, Cynthia A. Hoffner, and Liesbet van Zoonen. John Wiley
& Sons, 2017, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0040
https://www.thoughtco.com/cultivation-theory-definition-4588455?print 4/4