This document discusses the concepts of corporate personality and the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil. It explains that a corporation is a separate legal entity from its owners, known as the veil of the corporation. However, in cases of fraud, improper conduct, or to protect public policy, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold owners accountable. The document provides 10 examples of when courts have lifted the veil, including to collect taxes, prevent fraud, and avoid welfare legislation.
Original Description:
Original Title
6. Company Law-I, Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil (1).pdf
This document discusses the concepts of corporate personality and the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil. It explains that a corporation is a separate legal entity from its owners, known as the veil of the corporation. However, in cases of fraud, improper conduct, or to protect public policy, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold owners accountable. The document provides 10 examples of when courts have lifted the veil, including to collect taxes, prevent fraud, and avoid welfare legislation.
This document discusses the concepts of corporate personality and the doctrine of lifting the corporate veil. It explains that a corporation is a separate legal entity from its owners, known as the veil of the corporation. However, in cases of fraud, improper conduct, or to protect public policy, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold owners accountable. The document provides 10 examples of when courts have lifted the veil, including to collect taxes, prevent fraud, and avoid welfare legislation.
Dr. Pradip Kumar Das, Associate Professor, Department of Law and Governance, CUSB, for the students Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil A corporation is clothed with a distinct personality
Supported Case: Saloman vs.
Saloman & Co(1897)A.C.22 & Lee vs. Lee’s Air firming Ltd.(1961) A.C. 12
Principle of separate legal
entity/corporate personality may be called as “the veil of the corporation” Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil There is a fictional veil/legal fiction between company and its members
But, people started to use this veil of
corporate personality blatantly for fraud and improper conduct
As a result, it becomes necessary for
courts to break through or lift the corporate veil Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil Lifting of the corporate veil under judicial interpretation/ Cases when veil of the company may be lifted: (i). For Protection of revenue- - Juggilal vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, U.P., A.I. R. (1969)S.C.932 - Union of India Vs. Playword Electronics(pvt).Ltd.(1990)68 Comp.Cas 582(S.C.) (ii).For Determining the character of the Company- -Daimler Co. Ltd. Vs, Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd., (1916)2 A.C., 307 Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil (iii). For preventing fraud or improper conduct- -Jones vs. Lipman(19620All.E.R. 442 (iv). Where company acting as agent or trustee of the shareholders- - In Re R.G. Films Ltd.(1953)1 All.E.R. 615 (v). To Protect Public Policy- -In connors Bros. vs. Connors(1940)4 All.E.R.179 (vi).In Case of Economic Offences- -Santanu Roy vs, Union of India[1988(18)ECC51Del.] Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil (vii). Avoidance of Welfare Legislation- -The Workmen of Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. Vs, Associated Rubber Industry Ltd. (1986)59Comp.Cas.134(S.C.) (viii). Where the Company is a sham- - Gilford Motor Co. Ltd. vs. Horne(1933)Ch.935 C.A.
(ix). For determination of Technical Competence of a
Company- Concept of Corporate Personality & Doctrine of Lifting of the Corporate Veil - The New Horizons Ltd. Vs. Union of India(1995)SCC(1)478.
(x)To punish for Contempt of Court-
-Jyoti Ltd. Vs. Kanwaljit Kaur Bhasin(1987)62Comp.Cas.626, Delhi.
United States v. Yvonne Melendez-Carrion, Hilton Fernandez-Diamante, Luis Alfredo Colon Osorio, Filiberto Ojeda Rios, Orlando Gonzales Claudio, Elias Samuel Castro-Ramos and Juan Enrique Segarra Palmer, 804 F.2d 7, 2d Cir. (1986)