Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of Overvoltages in Overhead Ground Wires of Extra High Voltage (EHV) Power Transmission Line Under Single-Phase-To-Ground Faults
Analysis of Overvoltages in Overhead Ground Wires of Extra High Voltage (EHV) Power Transmission Line Under Single-Phase-To-Ground Faults
www.elsevier.com/locate/epsr
Abstract
Overhead ground wires (GW) of extra high voltage (EHV) power transmission lines, apart from lightning-induced overvoltage
protection are frequently used for carrier-current communication. In this case the ground wires are suspended on insulators, the
dielectric strength of which should be sufficient for the line operational conditions. The insulation level is defined from the
condition of the single-line-to-ground (SLG) fault, thus insulator protecting spark gaps should not be flashed-over during such
conditions — in order to maintain continuity of the communication channel along the line. Overvoltages during such faults
depend on many parameters such as fault place, fault angle, pre-fault load etc. Therefore, designers should investigate the problem
for determination of the worst-case scenario. In this paper, dependence of the overvoltages on 750 kV power transmission line
ground wires upon the SLG fault place and pre-fault load of the line in transient and steady states is investigated. The analysis
was performed by using dynamic arc model incorporated into the EMTP program. The provided simulations show that
adequately introduced primary and secondary arc models are decisive factors for an accurate simulation of the electromagnetic
phenomena in the EHV transmission lines during an arc crossing-over (here the primary arc plays an important role) and during
so called dead-time, when the secondary arc takes place. This paper gives some recommendations for the insulator strings
coordination in the 750 kV earth wires on the basis of computer simulation results. © 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights
reserved.
Keywords: Transmission line; Fault simulation; Arc model; Ground wires; EMTP
0378-7796/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 3 7 8 - 7 7 9 6 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 4 9 - 8
106 I. Dudurych, E. Rosolowski / Electric Power Systems Research 53 (2000) 105–111
Fig. 2. Transposition and crossing over scheme for the considered line.
I. Dudurych, E. Rosolowski / Electric Power Systems Research 53 (2000) 105–111 107
where Te is the secondary arc extinguishing time (when 3.5. Shunt reactors
tr 5 Te, ur =0); Is is the peak value of current on the
volt –ampere arc characteristic. Shunt reactors are represented by the ordinary RL
Time constants are determined as follows: uncoupling branches.
The developed model has been used for transient
akIk
Tk = (4) study under the single-phase-to-ground faults.
lk
where ak is the empirical coefficients.
The empirical coefficients ak can be obtained by 4. Simulation experiments
fitting Eq. (1) with Eq. (2) and Eq. (4) to match the
experimental VACs of the heavy- and low-current arcs, For investigation of the problem many different cases
accordingly. were analyzed. Consider the following scheme, the sin-
The described models of the primary and the sec- gle-phase-to-ground fault in phase C of the line from
ondary arcs were incorporated into EMTP through the the 750 kV power transmission system shown in Fig. 1
MODELS capability [4] using the TACS (transient is initiated at 5 ms. Circuit breakers of the sending and
analysis of control systems) – controlled type-91 time- receiving power systems open their contacts after 70
varying resistances. Besides that, the secondary arc ms. The secondary arc extinction occurs approximately
model comprises type-11 TACS-controlled switch. at 140 ms.
The implementation of the arc model is shown in Fig. As the GW are considered in this application to serve
4. It operates as follows, the integration step gk is as the communication channel for the emergency con-
evaluated by Eq. (1) and Eq. (2) on the basis of arc trol schemes, the ground wire insulation and protecting
current and voltage values from the previous step. spark gaps should not be flashed over during SLG
Type-11 switch is being opened when the secondary arc faults. Therefore, spark gaps were not simulated in the
extinguishing conditions occur and closed when the study.
recovery voltage exceeds the dielectric strength of In normal duty the voltage induced in the GW is
heated air around the short-circuit arcing column by relatively low (500–700 V for this case) and does not
previous arc ignition. define the GW insulation characteristics. They are
The simulation results obtained with the EMTP im- defined by voltages induced during single-phase-to-
plemented arc model were compared with the real-field ground faults. Therefore, the simulation experiments
on the power transmission line 1150 kV [10] and good for faults occurring in different locations along the line
matching was obtained. have been conducted. Maximum values of the over-
voltages under the SLG faults along the line are pre-
3.4. Circuit breakers sented in Fig. 5. It can be seen that the maximum
values of overvoltages depend upon the fault location
Circuit breakers are presented by time-controlled and are concentrated in the middle region of the line. It
EMTP switches [4], which are opened when current should be mentioned that maximum overvoltages occur
goes through zero after the prescribed opening time and in the vicinity of the position of the applied single-
closed after the prescribed closing moment, when the phase-to-ground fault. Exceptions are for the cases
current passes through zero. The same switches are when the fault occurs at one end of the line. Moreover,
used in the short circuit making scheme for the short- overvoltages occurring after the fault clearing are also
circuit initialization. dangerous and may reach values commensurate with
those induced by the fault current, especially when the
fault occurs far away from the substation.
As is seen from Fig. 5, the insulation level of the GW
in the middle of the line should be chosen higher than
that of the rest. For example, according to the maximal
GW overvoltage value of 206.3 kV (in node 10 of Fig.
2, under the SLG fault at this location) the number of
insulators n in the GW insulator chain (string) of the
! " ! "
750 kV line should be chosen from [1]:
umax 206.3
n=int = int =7
Emdll 1.1 · 29
Fig. 4. Primary and secondary arc models implementation: u, i is the
voltage and current at the fault place; Ra is the non-linear resistance where umax is the GW insulator string affecting voltage,
of the arc; on – off-signal switching-on when the secondary arc kV; ll is the leakage path length, cm (for the glass
reignites, and switching-out when it extinguishes. insulators of the 750 kV line ll = 29 cm); Emd =(0.5–
I. Dudurych, E. Rosolowski / Electric Power Systems Research 53 (2000) 105–111 109
Fig. 6. Ground wires voltage measured at node 1 during SLG fault at node 13.
1.1) kV/cm (maximum value)-moisture discharge elec- and in nodes 1 and 15—only three insulators for
tric field intensity, int{ } is the rounding to the nearest ground wire suspending.
greater or equal integer value. At the same time the In Fig. 6, overvoltages in node 15 (see Fig. 2)
number of insulators in node 2 may be chosen as n= 5 (18.5 km from the sending end of the line) induced by
110 I. Dudurych, E. Rosolowski / Electric Power Systems Research 53 (2000) 105–111
the SLG short-circuit in node 13 (74.8 km from is seen from Figs. 6 and 7 that overvoltages in GWs
the sending end) are shown. Similar picture of over- drastically depend upon location along the line and they
voltage are observed in node 1 (21 km from the receiving are higher in GW located just over the faulted phase.
end). In Figs. 8 and 9 GW’s currents at the beginning
In Fig. 7. GW’s overvoltages in node 5 (145 km from and at the end of the line under considered faults
the receiving end of line) induced by the SLG fault in are shown. These currents contain high harmonics, which
node 13 (74.8 km from the sending end) are shown. It influence the communication quality along the GW.
Fig. 7. Ground wires voltage measured at node 5 during SLG fault at node 13.
Fig. 8. Ground wires current at the beginning of line during SLG fault at node 13.
I. Dudurych, E. Rosolowski / Electric Power Systems Research 53 (2000) 105–111 111
Fig. 9. Ground wires current at the end of line during SLG fault at node 13.