The document presents evidence under notary seal to a judge regarding a case. It requests that the court take notice that based on an Administrative Judgment presented, it lacks jurisdiction over a property dispute currently before it. The Administrative Judgment establishes the claimant's right to possession of the property and invalidates the alleged seller's conveyance to the plaintiff. It provides certified copies of records and instruments as evidence and asks the court to dismiss the unlawful detainer case.
The document presents evidence under notary seal to a judge regarding a case. It requests that the court take notice that based on an Administrative Judgment presented, it lacks jurisdiction over a property dispute currently before it. The Administrative Judgment establishes the claimant's right to possession of the property and invalidates the alleged seller's conveyance to the plaintiff. It provides certified copies of records and instruments as evidence and asks the court to dismiss the unlawful detainer case.
The document presents evidence under notary seal to a judge regarding a case. It requests that the court take notice that based on an Administrative Judgment presented, it lacks jurisdiction over a property dispute currently before it. The Administrative Judgment establishes the claimant's right to possession of the property and invalidates the alleged seller's conveyance to the plaintiff. It provides certified copies of records and instruments as evidence and asks the court to dismiss the unlawful detainer case.
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL --- NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
From: Thomas J. Witness c/o 123 Sunset Boulevard Hollywood, California Non‐domestic without the U.S.
To: Judge Sandra J. Stevens c/o Van Nuys Court House East Department H / Room 310 6230 Sylmar Avenue Van Nuys, California 91401
Re: Case No. 77H00001
Service: USPS Express Mail Article No. EG 111 000 333 US; Notary’s Certificate of Service
Honorable Judge Stevens,
I have been contacted by John Henry Doe, hereinafter “CLAIMANT”, from outside the United States for the purpose of presenting the records of an international transaction under notary seal in regards to the above‐referenced matter, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 77H00001, hereinafter “UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE”.
I have been asked to mention: i) that the record of an Administrative Judgment, a certified copy of which is enclosed herewith as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, constitutes the claim by the CLAIMANT for the right of the possession of the real property commonly known as: 4321 SUMMERSET ROAD, WOODLAND HILLS, CALIFORNIA 91367, County of Los Angeles Assessor’s Parcel No. 1111‐000‐011, hereinafter “COLLATERAL”; ii) that the record of an Administrative Judgment, as a FINAL EXPRESSION IN A RECORD, comprises a complete and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the parties therein; iii) that the Plaintiff in the UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE, hereinafter “ALLEGED BUYER”, purportedly purchased the COLLATERAL from CAL‐WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, hereinafter “ALLEGED SELLER”; iv) that the ALLEGED SELLER stipulates that the ALLEGED SELLER did not have the power of sale required to convey the COLLATERAL to the ALLEGED BUYER and said conveyance is null and void; v) that the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, d/b/a Los Angeles Superior Court, hereinafter “COURT”, lacks subjectmatter jurisdiction, pursuant to the right of the possession of the COLLATERAL being already determined by the Administrative Judgment; vi) that the law firm representing the ALLEGED BUYER, as a party to the Administrative Judgment, was given notice of the CLAIMANT’s claim for the right of the possession of the COLLATERAL and stipulates to the facts set forth in said claim; vii) that contained within the records are certified copies of the instruments executed in my capacity as a witness to the course of dealing between the parties and thereby constitutes prima facie evidence of the instruments own authenticity and genuineness and of the facts stated in the instruments by a third party; viii) that these records are private and proprietary and are to be kept confidential so as to not prejudice the rights and interests of the CLAIMANT; ix) that a public record of the Administrative Judgment, a certified copy of which is enclosed herewith as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference; and x) that the records of service by postal carriers, certified copies of which are enclosed herewith as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference, constitutes prima facie evidence by a third party of the presentment of the CLAIMANT’s claim.
PRESENTMENT OF EVIDENCE UNDER NOTARY SEAL Page 1 of 2
Therefore, the CLAIMANT requests the COURT take notice of its lack of subject‐matter jurisdiction regarding the COLLATERAL in the UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE and dismiss the UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASE on its own motion.
This observation in facilitation of international commerce should not be deemed a power of attorney or the practice of law. I am merely a duty‐bound messenger.
Thank you for your assistance and for honoring this request. All communication should be delivered through me at the above address by Registered or Certified Mail to ensure delivery and appropriate certification.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
January 10, 2011 __________________________________________________ _________________________ (Seal) NOTARY DATE (Void where prohibited by law)
January 22, 2013 My commission expires: _____________________
PRESENTMENT OF EVIDENCE UNDER NOTARY SEAL Page 2 of 2