Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ARTHUR T. MALUTAO Name of Rater: BENEDICT A. REYES


Position: TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: OCCIDENTAL MINDORO Date of Review: APRIL 10,2019
Rating Period: OCTOBER 2018-APRIL 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied knowledge JUNE Quality Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge of No acceptable Showed knowledge 3 2 2.500 0.187
Services Knowledge and of content within and 2018 TO content and its content and its content and its content and its evidence was of content and its
Pedagogy across curriculum MARCH integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within and shown integration within and
teaching areas. 2019 across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas
as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 7

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons using MOV 1 using MOV 1 and using MOV 1 and the given MOV evidence was lessons using MOV 1
and supported by any supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of shown and supported by any
1 of the other given the other given MOV the other given MOV 1 of the other given
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range of JUNE Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 3 2 2.500 0.187
Services teaching strategies 2018 TO different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
that enhance learner MARCH strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
schievement in literacy 2019 promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
and numeracy skills writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4 a rating of 7

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 learner- Submitted 2 learner- Submitted 1 learner- No acceptable Submitted at least 4
learner-centered centered lessons as centered lessons as centered lessons as evidence was learner-centered
lessons as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown lessons as evidently
shown in MOV 1 and MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported any of the other given shown in MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other MOV supported by any 1 of
the other MOV given MOV given MOV given the other MOV given

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range of JUNE Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 3 2 2.500 0.187
Services Knowledge and teaching strategies to 2018 TO teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Pedagogy develop critical and MARCH that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
creative thinking, as 2019 and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking
well as other higher skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other skills and/or other
order thinking skills. HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in HOTS as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 of 7
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson as No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons as evidenced as evidenced by MOV as evidenced by MOV evidenced by any of evidence was lessons as evidenced
by MOV 1 and 1 and supported by 1 and supported by the other given MOV shown by MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of any 1 of the other any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of
the other given MOV given MOV given MOV the other given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed classroom JUNE Quality Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable Used classroom 5 2 3.500 0.262
Services Environment structure to engage 2018 TO management management management management evidence was management
and Diversity of learners, individually or MARCH strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
Learners in groups, in meanigful 2019 engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
exploration, discovery activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
and hands-on activities shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
within a range of a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4 a rating of 7
physical learning 7.5%
environments. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted only one
lessons supported by supported by MOV 1 supported by MOV 1 supported by any of evidence was lesson plan for
MOV 1 and any 1 of and any 1 of the other and any 1 of the other the acceptable MOV shown demonstration
the other acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV teaching and only 1
MOV COT

Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed learner JUNE Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 5 2 3.500 0.262
Services behavior constructively 2018 TO management management management management evidence was management
by applying positive MARCH strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
and non-violent 2019 behavior that promote behavior that promote behavior that promote behavior that promote behavior that
discipline to ensure positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- promote positive and
learning-focused violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as violent discipline as non-violent discipline
environment shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV as shown in MOV
submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a submitted with a
7.5% rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4 rating of 7

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted only one
of the given strategies of the given strategies of the given strategies the given strategies evidence was lesson plan for
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 as observed in only 1 shown demonstration
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson teaching and only 1
COT
Environment
and Diversity of
Learners

Basic Education 5. Managed learner JUNE 5 2 3.500 0.262


Services behavior constructively 2018 TO
by applying positive MARCH
and non-violent 2019
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environment

7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted only one
of the given strategies of the given strategies of the given strategies the given strategies evidence was lesson plan for
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 as observed in only 1 shown demonstration
least 4 lessons lessons lessons lesson teaching and only 1
COT
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used differentiated, JUNE Quality Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated No acceptable Applied differentiated 4 2 3.000 0.225
Services Environment developmentally 2018 TO teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to evidence was teaching strategies to
and Diversity of appropriate learning MARCH address learner address learner address learner address learner shown address learner
Learners experiences to 2019 diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
address learners’ MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
gender, needs, of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 of 7
strengths, interests
and experiences.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
7.5% differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching differentiated teaching evidence was differentiated
strategies in at least strategies in at least 2 strategies in 2 strategy in only 1 shown teaching strategies in
2 lessons as lessons as evidenced lessons as evidenced lesson as evidently at least 2 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1 by MOV 1 and by MOV 1 and shown in any 1 of the evidenced by MOV 1
and supported by any supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV and supported by any
1 of the other the other acceptable the other acceptable 1 of the other
acceptable MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, managed JUNE Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Acquire a rating of 6 4 2 3.000 0.225
Services and Planning and implemented 2018 TO implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was in objective no. 7 in
developmentally MARCH developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown COT
sequenced teaching 2019 sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching
and learning and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
processes to meet as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
curriculum with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
requirements and
varied teaching Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
contexts. 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching shown sequenced teaching
and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process and learning process
as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in as evidently shown in
MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and supported any 1 of the given MOV 1 and
by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other by any 1 of the other MOV supported by any 1 of
given MOV given MOV given MOV the other given MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in JUNE Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated in No acceptable Consistently 5 3 4.000 0.3
Services and Planning collegial discussions 2018 TO participated in participated in participated in LAC/FGD/ meeting to evidence was participated in
that use teacher and MARCH LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/ discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
learner feedback to 2019 to discuss to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner to discuss
enrich teaching teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
practice. feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as shown feedback to enrich
instruction as shown instruction as shown instruction as shown in the MOV submitted instruction as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Participated in at least Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in at
4 LACs/FGDs/meetings LACs/FGDs/meetings LAC/FGD/meeting as evidence was least 4
LACs/FGDs/meetings as evidently shown in as evidently shown in evidently shown in shown LACs/FGDs/meetings
as evidently shown in any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given as evidently shown in
any 1 of the given MOV MOV MOV any 1 of the given
MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, JUNE Quality Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used No acceptable Acquire a rating of 1 3 2 2.500 0.187
Services developed, organized 2018 TO varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and evidence was in objective no. 8 in
and used appropriate MARCH learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, shown COT
teaching and learning 2019 including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
resources, including address learning address learning address learning address learning
ICT, to address goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
learning goals. MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable Submitted any
varied teaching and teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning evidence was teaching and learning
learning resources, resources, including resources, including resource, including shown resource, including
including ICT, as ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently ICT, as evidently
evidently shown in shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in any of the shown in any of the
MOV 1 and supported supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 of acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
by any 1 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, JUNE Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, selected, 4 5 4.5 0.337
Services and Reporting selected, organized 2018 TO organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was organized and used
and used diagnostic, MARCH diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative shown diagnostic, formative
formative and 2019 and summative and summative and summative and summative and summative
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent
consistent with with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with
7.5% a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 a rating of 4 a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 1
varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tool as evidence was assessment tool as
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown evidently shown in
shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the any of the acceptable any of the acceptable
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and JUNE Quality Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Rarely monitored and No acceptable Frequently monitored 5 5 4 4.667 0.350
Services evaluated learner 2018 TO monitored and and evaluated learner monitored and evaluated learner evidence was and evaluated
progress and MARCH evaluated learner progress and evaluated learner progress and shown learner progress and
achievement using 2019 progress and achievement using progress and achievement using achievement using
learner attainment achievement using learner attainment achievement using learner attainment learner attainment
data. learner attainment data as shown in the learner attainment data as shown in the data as shown in the
data as shown in the MOV submitted data as shown in the MOV submitted MOV submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable Submitted MOV were
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was distributed across 2
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown quarters
Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica ted JUNE Quality Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed No acceptable Consistently showed 4 4 4 4 0.3
Services and Reporting promptly and clearly 2018 TO prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
the learners’ needs, MARCH communication of the communication of the communication of the communication of the shown communication of the
progress and 2019 learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs, learners’ needs,
achievement to key progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and
stakeholders, including achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
parents/ guardians. stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted in the MOV submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was combination of at
least 4 of the the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown least 4 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV was No acceptable Submitted MOV were
distributed across 4 distributed across 3 distributed across 2 completed in only 1 evidence was distributed across 4
quarters quarters quarters quarter shown quarters
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various JUNE Quality Consistently Frequently performed Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Occasionally 5 5 5.000 0.500
Services related works/activities 2018 TO performed various various related performed various various related evidence was performed various
that contribute to the MARCH related work/activities work/activities that related work/activities work/activities that shown related work/activities
teaching-learning 2019 that contribute to the contribute to the that contribute to the contribute to the that contribute to the
process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in process as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
10%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable MOV evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Very Satisfactory 3.509
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory ARTHUR T. MALUTAO BENEDICT A. REYES
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Teacher II Principal II
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: ARTHUR T. MALUTAO Name of Rater: BENEDICT A. REYES


Position: TEACHER II Position: PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: OCCIDENTAL MINDORO Date of Review: 10-Apr-19
Rating Period: OCTOBER 2018-2019

Numerical Ratings
Weight per Weight per
KRA Objectives Score
KRA Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 3 2 2.500 0.187
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 3 2 2.500 0.187
Objective 3 7.5% 4 2 2.500 0.187
Objective 4 7.5% 5 2 3.500 0.262
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 2 3.500 0.262
Objective 6 7.5% 4 2 3.000 0.225
Objective 7 7.5% 4 2 3.000 0.225
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5 3 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 3 2 2.500 0.187
Objective 10 7.5% 4 5 4.500 0.337
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 4 4.667 0.350
Objective 12 7.5% 5 5 4 4.000 0.300
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating Very Satisfactory
Adjectival Rating 3.509
ARTHUR T. MALUTAO BENEDICT A. REYES
Ratee Rater Approving Authority
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and
4 Development 4
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear
4 and purposive and takes into account personal goals and 4
values congruent
Displays emotionalto that of theand
maturity organization.
enthusiasm for and is
4 challenged by higher goals. 3
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt
4 charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve goals. 4
Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and
4 others. 3
Professionalism and Ethics
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the
4 Norms of Conduct and Ethical Standards for public
Practices
officials andethical and professional
employees (RA 6713).behavior and conduct
4 taking into account the impact of his/her actions and
Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy,
decisions. 4
4 regularity of attendance and punctuality, good grooming
and communication.
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's
4 needs.
Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet
4 the organization's needs, improve system and help others
improve their effectiveness.
Result Focus
Achieve results with optimal use of time and resources
4 most of the time. mistakes and wastage through effective 3
Avoids rework,
4 Delivers error-free
work methods by placing outputs most of the time
organizational needsbybefore 3
conforming
personal needs.to standard operating procedures correctly and
3 consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of 4
Expresses
work in termsa desire to do better
of changes
usefulness/ and may express
acceptability andown work
4 Makes specific
frustration at waste or in the system
inefficiency. Mayorfocus
in on new or
completeness
methods with
to improve no supervision required.
more precise ways ofperformance. Examples
meeting goals set. may include
3 doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more 4
efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction,
Teamwork
morale, without setting any specific goal. 3
4 Willingly does his/her share of responsibility? 3
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to 3
4 teamwork and goal accomplishment across the
organization. 4
Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win
3 agreements.
3 Drives consensus and team ownership decisions.
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and
4 across organizations to accomplish organizational goals
and objectives.
Service Orientation
Can explain and articulate organizational directions,
4 issues and problems.
Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or
3 correcting customer service issues and concerns
Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and
3 women empowerment.
Participates in updating of office vision, mission,
3 mandates and strategies based on DepEd strategies and
Develops and adopts service improvement programs
directions.
4 through simplified procedures that will further enhance
service delivery.
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management Teamwork
1. Sets personal goals and direction, needs and Development 4 1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility 4
2. Understands personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes into account 2. Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
4 4
personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization. accomplishment across the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals. 4 3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements. 3
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts, checklists, etc.) to achieve
4 4. Drives consensus and team ownership decisions. 3
goals.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others. 4 4
accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Professionalism and Ethics Service Orientation
1. Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical
4 1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems. 4
Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
2. Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the 2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
4 3
impact of his/her actions and decisions. issues and concerns
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
4 3. Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment. 3
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. 4 3
on DepEd strategies and directions.
5. Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, 5. Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
4 4
improve system and help others improve their effectiveness. procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
Result Focus Innovation

1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Fosters
1. Achieve results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. 4 new ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational 3
efficiency).
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing 2. Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
4 4
organizational needs before personal needs. improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work 3 4
solutions.
in terms of usefulness/ acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. 4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the
4 4
May
5. focusspecific
Makes on newchanges
or moreinprecise ways or
the system of in
meeting goalsmethods
own work set. to improve work unit and organization.
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, 5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates
3 3
more efficiently; or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
any specific goal.

OVERALLCOMPETENCY RATING ###

You might also like