Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crusades Against Corruption: Muckrakers' Ambitious Journeys During The Progressive Era
Crusades Against Corruption: Muckrakers' Ambitious Journeys During The Progressive Era
Riju Datta
Senior Division
Historical Paper
The surge of Irish immigrants to America in the latter half of the 19th century in search of
economic opportunity and social mobility accelerated American industrialization and rapidly
expanded the wage-earning class by populating factories. In the face of nativist, anti-Catholic
sentiment from a Protestant-majority America, more and more Irish immigrants sought economic
and political protection from growing political machines of the Democratic Party that guaranteed
immigrants political representation and job opportunities. This immigrant base allowed political
machines such as Tammany Hall to further consolidate their control over city and state-level
politics and, thus, made it increasingly difficult to implement reform which attacked corporate
and political corruption. Furthermore, the rise of Big Business-era trusts, monolithic
corporations, and the “robber barons” of oil, steel, and coal industries reflected the stratification
of American society, which heightened deep-seated political and social inequalities that had
existed since the dawn of industrialization. In response to the unbridled power of both the leaders
business and politics. Muckrakers harnessed the power of new forms of communication, such as
newspapers, to increase their exposure to the American public and gain popular support for their
reform movements. Tragedies muckrakers and other Progressive Era reformers in the early 20th
century faced include the growing power of corrupt political machines and large corporations,
especially due to the domineering influence of these organizations and how such power and
Government opposition to Progressive Era reform was one of the biggest tragedies which
afflicted muckrakers in the early 20th century. Corrupt political machines such as Tammany Hall
were deeply entrenched in state-level politics. George Washington Plunkitt, a New York state
legislator, perpetuated such corruption by drawing distinctions between “honest… and dishonest
graft”, describing his blatant corruption as “[making] a profit on my… foresight”, and criticizing
provided (Plunkitt). Moreover, the strict hierarchical structure of urban gangs and “boss politics”
impeded many significant reform movements. Tammany Hall sachems, sardonically dubbed
“princes of jolliers”, were “distinguished among politicians as… [men] of [their] word”, which
appealed greatly to hordes of European immigrant populations seeking economic relief. This
source of growing political clout allowed Tammany Hall to tighten its chokehold on state-level
politics and strike down all attempts by reform-minded individuals to surmount such political
power (Reid). In addition, police corruption was yet another tragedy which hindered the progress
Minneapolis’s criminals to the complicity and greed of both police chiefs and the mayor, who
“made a schedule of prices ‘for the privilege of breaking the law’” (Hartshorn). Steffens also
recognized political and economic patronage of Tammany Hall-like organizations as key causes
for the continuation of blatantly corrupt urban politics. Only through the bureaucratization of
police forces, he pleaded, would police officers be truly free from the snares of political
corruption (Reiss). Nevertheless, local and state government were not the only sources of
opposition to reform – national leaders also sought to ensure their own power through the
4
Datta
condonation of corruption. President Theodore Roosevelt’s contradictory nature encapsulates
both contempt and hesitancy towards enacting sweeping reform measures. Roosevelt first
publicly used the pejorative “muckraker” to describe their investigative journalism (Jensen).
Furthermore, while claiming that he would “ensure social justice and economic opportunity
through government regulation”, Roosevelt saw Big Business as a “natural part of a maturing
economy” and, hence, held reservations towards large-scale reform during his presidential
tenure. Given that Roosevelt relied upon the power of congressional Republicans to ensure his
presidential nomination in 1904, it is clear how both Roosevelt’s grim political reality and firm
convictions regarding the role of trusts and Big Business in society further entrenched such
economic reform in Progressive Era America. Prior to the turn of the 20th century, the “trusts,
corporations, [and] the millionaires of Chicago [paid] taxes on less than one-tenth of the value of
their enormous holdings”, and by 1888, the state of Iowa lost approximately $1.3 billion due to
highlighting the stark inequality between “the rich and the rest”, citing the Political Science
Quarterly’s analysis that stated “4,047 families possess as much as do 11,593,887 families”
(Beatty 201). By the early 1900s, four meat-packing corporations – Armour, Swift, Morris, and
National Packing – had consolidated their power over other companies within the industry and
were able to “dictate prices to cattle ranchers, feed growers, and consumers”, thus hindering
economic competition and fair trade. The unfair centralization of power by large
corporations was the main source of animosity of the working classes and smaller merchants
5
Datta
attempting to compete in national markets. Muckrakers capitalized on such abhorrence to elevate
their demands for social reform to a national platform (“Upton Sinclair’s”). Nevertheless, the
influence of Big Business within American society beset muckraker reform with many tragedies
In contrast, muckrakers achieved many successes in their reform campaigns due to their
direct, artless appeals for change to the American public. The rapid expansion of newspapers and
mass media during the early part of the 20th century expanded the muckrakers’ reach to far more
American citizens and provided a source of revenue to the burgeoning movement. Especially in
the face of sensationalistic yellow journalism of the previous decade, by focusing on the facts
and reporting the strife in 20th century America exactly as how it was perceived, muckrakers
more easily spread their message across the American public (Peer). On the other hand,
muckrakers were not only influenced by a general desire to improve American society, but also
to quell the “revolutionary changes… in everyday life” and combat a “renewed American
radicalism” which could potentially devolve into “socialist insurgency” (Helgeson). Regardless
of their desires for reform, however, muckrakers directly targeted the American public and
expanded the bases of Progressive Era reform drastically. One of the earliest reformers to openly
criticize the inherent political corruption of Tammany Hall was Thomas Nast, a cartoonist for
Harper’s Weekly whose scathing cartoons raised awareness of the myriad of wrongs committed
by Tweed and his cronies in the early 1870s. Nast's negative depictions of Tammany Hall bosses
(See Appendix A) and their blatant corruption surpassed the illiteracy of the majority of
working-class urban laborers and raised awareness of the extent of Tammany Hall's political
corruption, thus fueling public outrage (DiFablo). Moreover, arguably the most prolific
muckraker of the Progressive Era is Lincoln Steffens, whose works “Tweed Days in St. Louis”
6
Datta
and The Shame of the Cities both works reflect the unique power of the muckraker movement.
“Tweed” captures Steffens’ novel journalistic style of writing about his own interests through
clear, incisive, and easily readable literature in the hopes of capturing the attention of the public
(Jensen). Shame frequently relies on direct questions and affronts, such as “The misgovernment
of the American people is misgovernment by the American people”, to demand that Americans
themselves need to take political action and limit the power of corrupt political machines like
Tammany Hall. However, Steffens contrasts such vehement attacks on political corruption by
offering solace and optimism, claiming that all “honest voters” must “establish a steady demand
for good government” to combat political graft (Steffens). In close relationship with Steffens was
S.S. McClure, the magazine publisher who ran McClure’s Magazine from 1893 to 1911. Using
this magazine as a national platform, McClure frequently appealed directly to the American
public, claiming that only they were capable of upholding the law in the face of elitist
muckrakers were outwardly fervent advocates for the preservation of individuals’ rights and
equality, fame and profit frequently drove such reformers to spread their messages. McClure did
not wish to sell the magazine as “an organ for reform” and sought to “[increase] circulation
rather than [affect] social change” (Baxter). Regardless, muckrakers undoubtedly altered
American perceptions of reform itself. The work of Steffens and other muckrakers reinforced the
idea that reform required “the bravery and vigor of… citizen-heroes”, both being characteristics
that were attributed to men in the early 20th century. Especially by changing such perceptions in
the eyes of lower classes, reform movements were now more readily adopted within local and
city-level politics (Connolly). Moreover, over the course of the Progressive Era, the American
public gradually associated reform with protection of economic individualism and political
7
Datta
democracy. Coupled with preexisting popular discontent towards trusts and large-scale
The work of muckrakers in the Progressive Era was reflected in the numerous political
ramifications such advancements entailed. The most tangible examples of muckraker reform
legislation are the enactments of the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Food and Drug
Administration in June 1906, as well as the Meat Inspection Act in March 1907. These pieces of
legislation were fueled by Upton Sinclair’s jarringly accurate The Jungle, an influential novel
published in February 1906 that exposed the horrid working conditions of Chicago’s meat-
packing industry. Through the novel’s publishing, Sinclair served as an impetus for not only
other muckrakers to expose blatant wrongs in American society, but also leaders within
governmental bodies to pass regulatory policies, such as Harvey W. Wiley, a chief chemist in the
Department of Agriculture who began a “pure food crusade” following The Jungle (“Upton
Sinclair’s”). Ida B. Wells was another famous Progressive Era reformer whose work was
instrumental in convincing the American public of the wrongs of lynching. The acerbic tone and
the "new ethos" that Wells adopted reflects the Progressive Era trend of more direct, eye-opening
literary works which more vividly captured the attention of the American people, thus garnering
immense popular support for such demands for reform. Her deliverance of the uncut truth in her
work, the “mobilization of public sentiment”, and the use of a “fearlessly edited press” was
crucial in shaping the works of other reformers and mobilized a larger force against the ever-
present corruption of 20th century American politics. Her influence led to the creation of the
Muckrakers were also a seminal group in further democratizing American politics. The
1913 passage of the 17th Amendment allowed for popular voting to control Senate elections and
8
Datta
was directly caused by David Graham Phillips “The Treason of the Senate”, published in 1906.
Phillips uses the Republican and Democratic parties as tools to convey his idea that by going
against the will of their own political party in favor of the interests of wealthy businessmen and
corporations, Senator Aldrich, a powerful Senate Republican from Rhode Island dubbed the
“General Manager of the Nation” who heavily influenced tariff and monetary policy during the
first decade of the 20th century, and Senator Gorman, a Democratic Senator from Maryland, have
implicated themselves for treason and should be treated as criminals. Phillips makes clear to the
American public the wrongness inherent in political corruption and warns other politicians of the
importance of remembering the common good instead of one's own personal gain (Phillips). The
establishment of national newspaper chains and newspaper syndication services such as E.W.
Scripps’ Newspaper Enterprise Association, which was founded in 1902, also democratized
politics, for these services allowed muckrakers and reformers to reach a much wider audience
analysis of Tammany Hall’s role in society regards their relationship with Irish and European
immigrant populations. In 2014, Terry Golway shed light on a different perspective of Tammany
leadership, framing the Irish-American sachems as promoters of the common good: “Kelly's
leadership of Tammany was contingent on his ability to please the likes of Tilden, Belmont, and
the other Swallowtails... while not losing sight of the expectations of his fellow Irish-Americans
who looked to Tammany as a friend in need when times were tough.” The implementation of
reform was difficult because of how reliant the poorer classes, particularly Catholic Irish
immigrants, were for economic support, political representation, and protection from a society
increasingly hostile towards immigrant populations (See Appendix B). Such institutions had
9
Datta
immigrants' resolute support, regardless of their corrupt practices (Golway). Furthermore, many
Tammany Hall sachems could associate with the plight of Irish-Americans in urban communities
and sought to provide economic support for the common man. Richard Croker, a Tammany Hall
Grand Sachem for over fifteen years, “grew up in a poor Irish family of squatters” and “fought
his way out of the slums as a paid brawler for Tammany and Boss Tweed” (Hartshorn). Several
historians view the patronage of Democratic political machines as beneficial to urban politics,
regarding city machines as “integrators of the poor” and invaluable “providers of social welfare
services to immigrant populations” (Reid). Other historians saw the protection Tammany Hall
offered for lower classes as necessary. Many legislators at the turn of the 20th century financed
the growth of American industry in hopes of maintaining their own power, and this was usually
coupled with the neglect of workers’ rights. Due to such conditions, political organizations such
as Tammany Hall, for a brief period of time, served an invaluable role in checking the powers of
corrupt legislators (Helgeson). In essence, while the bulk of Tammany Hall was notorious for
widespread corruption and blatant political graft, its role as a champion of the common welfare
While muckrakers faced significant tragedies through the growing power of corporations
and political machines, triumphs they achieved include the democratization of American politics
and the enactment of sweeping reform legislation. Muckrakers were a driving force in the reform
movements of the early 20th century and continued the trend of American reform and desires of
perfectionism that began with the temperance, feminist, and abolitionist movements of the early
19th century. Moreover, the profound influence of muckrakers reinforced the power of the
individual within American society and would be critical in propagating reform movements with
social and political ramifications, such as the women’s suffrage movement of the early 1910s
10
Datta
and 1920s and the Civil Rights movement of the early 1960s. While it has been tested throughout
the 20th century, the ideology that reform can be implemented to protect individuals’ rights and
promote moral and social progress has pervaded American culture since the muckraking era, and
their method of clear, incisive investigative journalism continues to inspire social reformers in
Primary Sources:
McClure, Samuel Sidney. "The Challenge of the Muckrakers." Annals of American History,
Nast, Thomas. The American River Ganges. 30 Sept 1871. Thomas Nast Cartoons,
https://thomasnastcartoons.com/irish-catholic-cartoons/the-american-river-ganges-1871/
Nast, Thomas. What Are You Laughing At? To the Victor Belong the Spoils. 1871. Museum of
Phillips, David Graham. The Treason of the Senate. Cosmopolitan. W.W Norton,
www.wwnorton.com/college/history/archive/resources/documents/ch24_02.htm.
Steffens, Lincoln Joseph. "The Shame of Our Cities." Annals of American History, Encyclopedia
Secondary Sources:
12
Datta
Baxter, Katharine Isobel. "'He's Lost More Money on Conrad than Any Other Editor Alive!':
Conrad and McClure's Magazine." Conradiana, vol. 41, nos. 2-3, Summer-Fall 2009, pp.
Beatty, Jack. Age of Betrayal: The Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900. Alfred A. Knopf.
Connolly, James C. "The Public Good and the Problem of Pluralism in Lincoln Steffens's Civic
Imagination." The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr.
DiFablo, Anne. "Thomas Nast Takes down Tammany: A Cartoonist’s Crusade against a Political
2018.
Golway, Terry. Machine Made: Tammany Hall and the Creation of Modern American Politics.
Liveright Publishing.
Hartshorn, Peter. I Have Seen the Future - a Life of Lincoln Steffens. Counterpoint, 2011.
Helgeson, Jeffrey. "American Labor and Working-Class History, 1900–1945." 20th Century:
Pre-1945, Urban History, Labor and Working Class History, Aug. 2016. Oxford
Nov. 2018.
Jensen, Carl. Stories That Changed America - Muckrakers of the 20th Century. Seven Stories
Press, 2000.
13
Datta
Milkis, Sidney. "Theodore Roosevelt: Domestic Affairs." UVA - Miller Center, Rector and
theses.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/123456789/3634/Peer%2C_S._van_1.pdf?sequence=1.
Reid, Joseph D., Jr., and Michael M. Kurth. "The Rise and Fall of Urban Political Patronage
Volume to Honor Robert W. Fogel, Jan. 1992, pp. 427-45. National Bureau of Economic
Reiss, Albert J., Jr. "Police Organization in the Twentieth Century." Crime and Justice, vol. 15,
Sheriff, Stacey Ellen. Rhetoric and Revision: Women's Arguments for Social Justice in the
Progressive Era. 2009. Penn State U, PhD dissertation. Penn State, Pennsylvania State
"Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle': Muckraking the Meat-Packing Industry." Bill of Rights in Action,
rights-in-action/bria-24-1-b-upton-sinclairs-the-jungle-muckraking-the-meat-packing-
Nast depicted Tweed as extremely bloated to emphasize his political corruption. His negative
Nast, Thomas. What Are You Laughing At? To the Victor Belong the Spoils. 1871
Museum of the City of New York, www.mcny.org/story/thomas-nast-takes-down-tammany-
cartoonists-crusade-against-political-boss.
15
Datta
Appendix B
Here, Nast depicts Catholics as beastly, dehumanized reptiles preying on innocent Protestant
children and places Boss Tweed in the background dropping Protestant children down onto the
beach. The image served to stoke Protestant and Republican fears of the growing dominance of
Nast, Thomas. The American River Ganges. 30 Sept 1871. Thomas Nast Cartoons,
https://thomasnastcartoons.com/irish-catholic-cartoons/the-american-river-ganges-1871/