Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is A Marketing Mix?
What Is A Marketing Mix?
1 MARKETING MIX
It is a set of controllable tactical marketing tools - product, price, place & promotion - that the
PRODUCT PRICE
Product Variety List Price
Quality MRP
Designs Discounts
TARGET
Features Allowances
CUSTOMERS
Brand name
INTENDED
Packaging
PLACE
PROMOTION
Channels
Advertising
Coverage
Personal Selling
Assortments
Sales Promotion
Locations
Fig. 2
Effective marketing would be blending the marketing mix elements into a coordinated
consumers.
Cola - Cola has always worked upon their marketing mix tools since its entry into India and
Coke’s objective has been to strengthen their brand in important segments of the market and to
PRODUCT
Coke was launched in India in Agra, October 24, in '93', soon after its traditional all Indian
launch of its Cola. at the sparking new bottling plants at Hathra, near Agra. Coke was back with
Coke was planning to launch in next summer the orange drink, Fanta-with the clear lemon drink,
Coke already owns more brands than it will over need, since it has bought out Ramesh Chauhan.
Coke just needs to juggle these brands around dextrously to meet its objectives, to ensure that
For if a vacuum develops, it is Pepsi which has the brand muscle and the distribution network to
grab customers today-not Coke. But Coke could not reduce its marketing support for Thums Up
until its own Cola would hit the four major metros (Delhi. Bombay, Calcutta and Madras)
Therefore, Coke had to give its existing levels of support for Parle's brands and would push
Thums Up and Limca. Coke has plans to' use quality and hygiene as USPs. Their aim seems to
In, 1998 Coke's product line includes, Coca-Cola, Thums Up, Fanta, Gold Spot, Maaza, Citra,
Coca-Cola India Limited (CCIL) has bottled its Cola drink in different sizes and different
packaging i.e., 200 ml bottle, 300 ml. Bottle, 330 ml. Cans, 500 ml. Bottle fountain Pepsi, and
PRODUCT POSITIONING
One important thing must be noticed that Thums Up is a strong brand in western and southern
India, while Coca Cola is strong in Northern and Eastern India. With volumes of Thums Up
being low in the capital, there are likely chances of Coca Cola slashing the prices of Thums Up
to Rs. 5 and continue to sell Coca Cola at the same rate. Analysts feel that this strategy may help
Coke since it has 2 Cola brands in comparison to Pepsi which has just one.
Thums Up accounts for 40% of Coca Cola company's turnover, followed by Coca Cola which
has a 23% share and Limca which accounts for 17% of the turnover of the company. (Thums up
being the local drink, its share in the market is intact, forcing the company to service the brand,
as it did last year Mr. Donald short CEO, Coca Cola India, said that, " we will be absolutely
comfortable if Thums Up is No. 1 brand for us in India in the year 2005. We will sell whatever
consumers wants us to". Coca Cola India has positioned Thums up as a beverage associated with
adventure because of its strong taste and also making it compete with Pepsi as even Pepsi is
Coke gained an early advantage over Pepsi since it took over Parle in 1994. Thus it had ready
Thus Coke had greater than Pepsi because it had ready access to the Parle network. For example
in 1994 Pepsi had 20 bottlers to serve the entire country while Coke had Parle’s 60 bottlers. In
an important market like Delhi Pepsi had just one bottler while Coke had four. On the other
In 1993, Pepsi Foods Ltd. had control over the Rs. 1,100 - Crore Indian Soft Drinks market. At
that time, the soft drinks trycoon Ramesh Chauhan, was heading the Parle group and at that time
was deciding to explore the possibility of selling his best rolling brands to Coke, rather than to
Pepsi. Pepsi had entered the market 3 years before Coke did. Before the Coke-Parle tie-up in
'93- Ramesh Chauhan had 2 options before him- (1) to stick around, fight it out again and
hopefully, continue with his number one position. (2) to sell out to Coca-Cola for a good return.
This risk of losing out to one of the multinationals, eventually, seemed to be throwing up the
second alternative. Ramesh Chauhan told business world (India's most popular business
magazine) that "it is better to seek a compromise than to fight a lone battle". But he was wisely
simultaneously taking steps to safeguard his market share. In a few months, Parle's products will
be launched in 250 ml instead the current 200 ml. The indications are that the company will hold
the price line. Incidentally, both Pepsi and Coke (if it finally gets in) will cost more than local
brands because of the 300% duly on the imported ingredients. However, this scenario was
taking place pre-liberalization period and hence implied a very high duty on imported items.
Entry of Pepsi and Coke in India or their proposals were at that time being opposed because of
the impact of first - strike on the minds of consumers. If Coca-Cola is allowed an easy and quick
entry through a window established by the government, there can be no justification for denying
Basically what was wrong at that time with the Coke proposal was that while the Pepsi deal
could go through under the camouflage of horticultures and agriculture development as their
proposal stated, a pure soft drinks project was not so politically palatable (as it would greatly
Coke had plans, to invest $ 20 million in India and Pepsi was going to pump in Rs. 300 crore
more. Ramesh Chauhan greatest compulsion, to 90 in for the 2nd option was that many of his
biggest bottlers were preparing to desert him for Coke, .since the bottlers accounted for nearly
one-third of Parle's sales. Parle's biggest bottles in the Easter region,. Goenka, accounted for
80% market share in Calcutta, felt that the future lay with Coca-Cola, no Indian company had the
drinks market and Coca-Cola's marketing strengths and experience would make an unbeatable
combination. At that time according to the world’s most popular and well known magazine,
Fortune, had rated Coke as the world's best brand. Even Coke would greatly benefit from the tie-
up, as Coke with Parle’s wide spread bottling and distribution network, which was spread over
more than a thousand towns and cities and the gradual withdraw of Parle brand would ensure
Coke would be the king. Parle's best known brands include Thums Up, Limca, Citra and others
The biggest advantage to Parle from the tie-up would be an instant gain of $ 40 million, which
According to a report the deal was that, Parle Exports had transferred the rights of all its reputed
soft drinks brands to Coca-Cola Company, USA. In short, Coca-Cola Company became the
exclusive owner of Thums Up, Limca, Gold Spot, Citra and Maaza and could therefore,
Under the agreement, the existing bottlers of Parle Exports would continue to produce Parle
The U.S. Multinational proposed to introduce its international brands -Coke, Fanta and Sprite at
an appropriate time. The Parle bottlers will be bottling these Coco - Cola brands also. The exact
So, Ramesh Chauhan, sold his soft drink brands of the U.S. Multinatinal for ($ 40 million) and is
presently a major Coke bottler. Delhi - based Parle Chairman gave up his ownership of his soft
drinks brand (Thums Up, Limca, Citra and Gold Spot) and was awarded the bottling franchisee
for Delhi, Bombay, Surat and Ahmedabad. Coke depends on the 54 bottling plants which it was
So, logically all brands of Parle as well as Coca-Cola will be marketed together. The only
problem being that Parle bottlers would not be able to meet the peculiar quality requirements of
Coke.
Quality includes all non-price attributes that count in the purchase decision