Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Subject Code: DRAW 1102
CRITERIA 4 3
• Drawing appears to have
an excellent appearance.
• All dimensions are
PROPER SIZE, precise and accurate.
SCALE AND • Right spacing is used to
DIMENSIONING display the final drawing
in a professional manner.
• Drawing is drawn to a
right scale.
• Completed 100% of the
COMPLETENESS
figure at a given time.
• The drawing output is
precise as required by
the instructor.
NEATNESS • The drawing is
exceptionally neat and
free of smudges, erasure
marks and/or ghost lines.
• Student used right
instrument properly in all
LINE QUALITY AND objects and shapes in the
THE USE OF figure.
MATERIALS • Lines are clear,
consistent line weights
(object lines stand out)
• Neat and legible
handwriting.
TITLE BLOCK • Complete and right
information is written on
the title block.
DRAW 1102 Engineering Drawing
Version 1 Revision 0, August 2020
Villamor, Piccio Garden, Pasay City
Aeronautical Engineering Department
First Semester, A.Y 2020–2021
RUBRICS
Prelim Examination
• Drawing appears to have
good appearance.
• At least five (5)
dimensions are off.
• Very few spacing are not
equally distributed.
• Drawing is drawn to a
right scale.
• Completed only 90% of
the figure at a given time.
• The drawing output is
somewhat precise yet has
few smudges, erasure
marks and/or ghost lines.
• Student has used the
right instrument yet did
not use it properly which
caused the drawing to
have few wavy lines and
somewhat inconsistency
in line weight.
• Line wavers off gridlines
slightly.
• Handwriting is slightly
messy
• Missing one (1) piece of
information.
Subject Descriptions: Engineering Drawing
2 1
• Drawing appearance is
fair.
• Six (6) to ten (10)
dimensions are off.
• Imbalanced spacing.
• Drawing is drawn to a
right scale.
• Completed only 80% of
the figure at a given time.
• The drawing output has
several smudges, erasure
marks and/or ghost lines.
• Student has used the
right instrument yet did
not use it properly which
caused the drawing to
have several inconsistent
line and line weights.
• Lines are wavy, blotted
inks from the technical
pens.
• Handwriting is messy yet
still legible.
• Two (2) to three (3)
information are missing.
Acc. No.: M2700903PM
Certificate Number: AJA16.0920
POINTS
• Drawing appears to have
a poor appearance.
• More than ten (10)
dimensions are off.
• No proper spacing shown.
• Drawing is drawn to a
wrong scale.
• Completed only 70% of
the figure at a given time.
• The drawing is full
smudges, and guidelines
are not erased properly.
• Lines are not straight,
very inconsistent in line
weights and did not use
proper instruments.
• Handwriting is not legible.
• More than three (3)
information are missing in
the title block.
Page 1 of 2
 Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
Villamor, Piccio Garden, Pasay City
OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ACADEMIC AFFAIRS
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Aeronautical Engineering Department
First Semester, A.Y 2020–2021 Acc. No.: M2700903PM
Certificate Number: AJA16.0920

• The Engineering • At least one (1) wrong
Lettering is precise and information is written on
meticulously written the title block.
according to the • Some letters are not
standard. written according to the
standards of Engineering
Lettering.
• Two (2) to three (3)
wrong information are
written in the title block.
• Most of the letters are not
properly written in
accordance with the
standards of Engineering
Lettering.
• More than three (3) wrong
information are written in
the title block.
• All letters are not written
in accordance with the
standards of Engineering
Lettering.

Comment/Suggestion:
Grade = (Total Points/20)*100

Prepared by: Endorsed by: Approved by:

AERO-AT DEPARTMENT MR. ADAM JAVIER A. DUEÑAS, MEAM DR. ELISA F. GRAMPIL
1ST Semester AY 2020-2021 PIC, BSAMT/AAMT Dean, InET

DRAW 1102 Engineering Drawing

Version 1 Revision 0, August 2020 Page 2 of 2