Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dual-Band Notched Ultra-Wideband Antenna by Using Step-By-Step Design Inside Conductor-Backed Plane
Dual-Band Notched Ultra-Wideband Antenna by Using Step-By-Step Design Inside Conductor-Backed Plane
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 1069
Figure 1 Geometry of the propose antenna with M-shaped form on the conductor-backed plane. (a) Dimensions (units: mm), (b) Photograph of fabri-
cated antenna (back). [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
on 0.8 mm FR4 substrate. The presented design is validated by optimized using the software HFSS for an UWB frequency
simulations and measurements. coverage. The optimized dimensions are 15 15 mm2 for the
substrate, 7.5 7.5 mm2 for the radiator, and 4 mm for the
width of the ground plane. As illustrated in Figure 1, a slotted
2. MONOPOLE ANTENNA DESIGN conductor-backed plane is placed under the patch and is also
Figure 1(a) shows the configuration of the proposed UWB symmetrical with respect to the longitudinal direction. The opti-
antenna with Wsub Lsub dimensions. The photograph of the mum gap between the radiator and the ground plane is 1.6 mm.
fabricated band-notched UWB antenna with the final optimal To modify the performance of the antenna by creating two sub-
design is shown in Figure 1(b). The top layer includes the main bands at the WiMAX (3.3–3.6 GHz), C-band (3.7–4.2 GHz),
radiator in the form of square patch and a CPW-ground plane. and WLAN (5.15–5.825 GHz), the conductor-backed plane is
The design starts by assuming that a square path of dimensions
pffiffiffiffi slotted in the manner shown in Figure 1. By using the small M-
kg/2 kg/2 (where kg is the guide wavelength ¼ c= er fc at shaped strip inside the conductor-backed plane as depicted in
the center of the UWB, that is, at 6.85 GHz, c is speed of light Figure 2(a), the two bands are centered at 3.2 and 6 GHz. How-
in free space) is placed at the top layer of a substrate as ever, it is also clear from Figure 3 that the antenna has a poor
depicted in Figure 1(a). Also, the bottom layer includes a slotted performance at the frequency band between 5 GHz and 5.5
conductor-backed plane. The proposed antenna, with compact GHz, which should be part of the WLAN band from 5.15 to
dimensions of 15 15 mm2, is constructed with a substrate 5.825 GHz. To improve the performance at the band, a final M-
made of FR4, with the thickness 0.8 mm and the relative dielec- shaped strip is included at the conductor-backed plane. By using
tric constant er ¼ 4.4. The initial dimensions of the substrate are the design, it is worth mentioning that using the slotted conduc-
chosen to be kg kg. The width of the CPW feedline is fixed at tor-backed plane in the manner shown in Figure 2(b), not only
3 mm for 50-X impedance. In the first step of the design, the enables the rejection of the undesired sub-bands, but it also
dimensions of the substrate, radiator, and CPW-ground plane are improves the performance at the upper frequency band. This is
1070 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop
Figure 2 The proposed antenna with an initial M-shaped design and final M–shaped design on the conductor-backed plane
proven by the simulated results shown in Figure 3. To estimate antenna are as follows: Wsub ¼ 15 mm, Lsub ¼ 15 mm, Wc ¼ 3
the effect of the design parameters and to show whether it is mm, gc ¼ 0.3 mm, Lgnd ¼ 4 mm, gap ¼ 1.6 mm, Lm ¼ 3 mm,
possible to easily control the position of the rejected bands, the Wm ¼ 4.5 mm. The other optimized dimensions of the antenna
simulated performance of the antenna is calculated for different are indicated in Figure 1. To show how the utilized conductor-
values for the design parameters. It is shown that the effective backed plane becomes effective in the rejection of the two sub-
parameter in the position of the lower rejected sub-band of bands, the field distribution at the structure of the first and sec-
WiMAX (3.3–3.6 GHz) and C-band (3.7–4.2 GHz), is the length ond notched frequency bands are given. As shown in Figure
Wm shown in Figure 1. The simulated results for different values 6(a), with a proper value for the design parameter Wm, the cur-
of this parameter are shown in Figure 4. Increasing that design rent at the lower side of M-shaped form and the lower-side of
parameter results in an increase in the frequency of the lower rectangular slot cut inside conductor-backed plane is at opposite
rejected sub-band with negligible effect on the upper rejected directions. Thus, the total effective radiation is very low, and
sub-band. From the simulated results indicated in Figure 4, it is thus a notched band is achieved. In Figure 6(b) and for the opti-
possible to verify that the center of the rejected sub-band is mized value of Lm, the current to the left and right side of the
defined by the length of the left hand or right hand track indi- M-shaped form are on opposite directions. Thus, the total radia-
cated in Figure 1. Concerning the upper rejected sub-band, the tion from the antenna ceases to exist and the input signal is
main parameter that defines that band is shown to be Lm. The reflected back. Thus, the overall radiation at this band is very
simulated performance of the antenna for different values of that limited and a second notched band is obtained.
parameter is shown in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5, the cen-
tral frequency of band notch at 5.5 GHz decreased by increasing 3. SIMULATION AND MEASUREMENT RESULT
the value of Lm. The whole structure of the antenna is optimized The impedance bandwidth with dual-notched characteristics is
using HFSS for the widest possible bandwidth using the most tested by using an Agilent 8722ES Vector Network Analyzer.
compact structure. The optimal parameters of the constructed
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 1071
Figure 5 Simulated VSWR of the antenna with different values for Lm
Figure 7 Measured and simulated VSWR of the proposed dual band-
notched antenna
The simulated and measured VSWR of the antenna depicted in
Figure 7 reveal that the antenna covers the ultra-wideband fre-
quency range from 2.6 GHz to more than 11 GHz in the meas-
urements, assuming VSWR ¼ 2 as a reference. Figure 7 clearly
shows that the constructed antenna exhibits two notched bands
centered at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz. Also, it can be observed that by using
this filter structures inside conductor-backed, the lowest frequency
is significantly decreased from 5.5 to 2.6 GHz. There is generally
a good agreement between the simulated and measured results.
Figure 8 shows the measured maximum antenna gain from 3 to 11
GHz for the developed antenna with the conductor-backed plane.
The values in Figure 8 indicate that the realized dual band-notched
antenna has good gain flatness except in the two notched bands,
where the gain decreases drastically at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz. Figure 9
shows the measured radiation pattern for three different frequencies
3, 6.5, and 9.5 GHz of the UWB band in H-plane (xoz-plane) and
E-plane (yoz-plane). From an overall view of these radiation pat-
terns, the designed antenna behaves quite similarly to the typical
printed monopoles in the lower and middle frequency bands. The
H-plane patterns are almost omnidirectionl, but they are more
directional in the higher band. All of the presented simulated and
measured results certify that the antenna is a promising candidate
for ultra-wideband systems that need to avoid any interference
with WiMAX (3.3–3.6 GHz), C-band (3.7–4.2 GHz), and WLAN
(5.15–5.825 GHz) bands.
1072 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop
Figure 9 Measured radiation pattern of the proposed antenna at: (a) 3 GHz; (b) 6.5 GHz; and (c) 9.5 GHz. Solid line: co-polarization; dashed line:
cross-polarization
DOI 10.1002/mop MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 1073
design inside the conductor-backed plane. Also, the notched
band can be controlled by adjusting the filter structure on the
SMALL PIFA FOR ZigBee AND WLAN
conductor-backed plane, which exempt from interfaces with APPLICATION
existing systems in WiMAX (3.3–3.6 GHz), C-band (3.7–4.2 Ching-Fang Tseng and Yi-Wen Chen
GHz), and WLAN (5.15–5.825 GHz). Experimental results show Department of Electronic Engineering, National United University,
that the fabricated antenna with proper dimensions and afore- No. 1 Lien Da, Kung-Ching Li, Miao-Li 36003, Taiwan;
mentioned characteristics, such as small size, light weight, and Corresponding author: cftseng@nuu.edu.tw
good omnidirectional radiation patterns, is a very good candidate
for UWB applications. Received 22 August 2012
wideband antenna with 3.5 and 5.5 GHz dual band-notched charac- Microwave Opt Technol Lett 55:1074–1077, 2013; View this article
teristics, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53 (2011), 370–375. online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. DOI 10.1002/mop.27511
4. M. Moosazadeh and Z. Esmati, A novel coplanar waveguide-fed
elliptical-shaped printed monopole antenna for ultrawideband appli- Key words: electromagnetic compatible; PIFA
cations, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 54 (2012), 675–677.
5. L.Y. Cai, Y. Li, G. Zeng, and H.C. Yang, Compact wideband 1. INTRODUCTION
antenna with double-fed structure having band-notched characteris-
tics, Electron Lett 46 (2010), 1534–1536.
Global demographic trends demonstrate a clear rise in the pro-
6. K. He, B.H. Sun, F.F. Zhang, Y.F. Wang, and J.Y. Xue, Realiza- portion of elderly and chronically ill individuals. This suggests
tion of dual band-notched function for a UWB antenna using the need for a new approach to health care. ZigBee is very
hybrid resonators, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 53 (2011), promising for healthcare application due to its low cost, low
1638–1641. data rate, longer communication range, and less power consump-
7. M. Moosazadeh, A.M. Abbosh, and Z. Esmati, Design of compact tion. ZigBee is an IEEE 802.15.4 standard for data communica-
planar ultrawideband antenna with dual-notched bands using slotted tion, that is, it provides wireless personal area network in the
square patch and pi-shaped conductor-backed plane, IET Micro- form of digital radio connections between computers and related
wave Antennas Propag 6 (2012), 290–294. devices [1].
8. M. Moosazadeh and Z. Esmati, A small CPW-fed ultra wideband
antenna with dual band-notched characteristics, Microwave Opt
Technol Lett 54 (2012), 1528–1532.
9. S.-J. Wu and J.-H. Tarng, Planar band-notched ultra-wideband
antenna with square-looped and end-coupled resonator, IET Micro-
wave Antennas Propag 5 (2011), 1227–1233.
10. X.-F. Zhu and D.-L. Su, Symmetric E-shaped slot for UWB
antenna with band-notched characteristics, Microwave Opt Technol
Lett 52 (2010), 1594–1597.
11. A. Edalati and T.A. Denidni, A compact UWB antenna with dual
band-notched characteristics, Microwave Opt Technol Lett 52
(2010), 1183–1186.
12. Z.L. Zhou, L. Li, and J.S. Hong, Compact UWB printed monopole
antenna with dual narrow band notches for WiMAX/WLAN bands,
Electron Lett 47 (2011), 1111–1112.
13. H.K. Yoon, Y.J. Yoon, H. Kim, and C.-H. Lee, Flexible ultra-
wideband polarisation diversity antenna with band-notch function,
IET Microwave Antennas Propag 5 (2011), 1463–1470.
14. R. Eshtiaghi, J. Nourinia, and C. Ghobadi, Electromagnetically
coupled band-notched elliptical monopole antenna for UWB
applications, IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 58 (2010),
1397–1402.
15. X.-J. Liao, H.-C. Yang, N. Han, and Y. Li, UWB antenna with
dual narrow band notches for lower and upper WLAN bands, Elec-
tron Lett 46 (2010), 1593–1594.
16. A.M. Abbosh and M.E. Bialkowski, Design of UWB planar band
notched antenna using parasitic elements, IEEE Trans Antennas
Propag 57 (2009), 796–799.
17. L.-N. Zhang, S.-S. Zhong, X.-L. Liang, and C.-Z. Du, Compact
omnidirectional band-notch ultra-wideband antenna, Electron Lett
45 (2009), 659–660. Figure 1 Geometry of the proposed dual-band printed PIFA. [Color
figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at
C 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
V wileyonlinelibrary.com]
1074 MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS / Vol. 55, No. 5, May 2013 DOI 10.1002/mop