See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/275451927

Electrospinning cellulose acetate nanofibers and a study

of their possible use in high-efficiency filtration

Article  in  Journal of Industrial Textiles · January 2014

DOI: 10.1177/1528083714540696

CITATIONS READS

18 841

4 authors, including:

Edison Omollo Josphat Igadwa Mwasiagi

The Technical University of Kenya Moi University
21 PUBLICATIONS   48 CITATIONS    67 PUBLICATIONS   206 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Sizo Ncube
National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo
9 PUBLICATIONS   37 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Use of Artificial Neural Network to study cotton growing and processing View project

Design and Scheduling of Garment Assembly Line Using Simulation-Based Optimization View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Edison Omollo on 24 May 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Journal ofhttp://jit.sagepub.com/
Industrial Textiles

Electrospinning cellulose acetate nanofibers and a study of their possible

use in high-efficiency filtration
Edison Omollo, Chuyang Zhang, Josphat Igadwa Mwasiagi and Sizo Ncube
Journal of Industrial Textiles published online 19 June 2014
DOI: 10.1177/1528083714540696

The online version of this article can be found at:

http://jit.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/06/18/1528083714540696

Published by:

http://www.sagepublications.com

Additional services and information for Journal of Industrial Textiles can be found at:

Email Alerts: http://jit.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts

Subscriptions: http://jit.sagepub.com/subscriptions

Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav

Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav

Citations: http://jit.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/06/18/1528083714540696.refs.html

>> OnlineFirst Version of Record - Jun 19, 2014

What is This?

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Article
0(00) 1–14
! The Author(s) 2014

Electrospinning cellulose Reprints and permissions:

sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1528083714540696
acetate nanofibers and a jit.sagepub.com

study of their possible use

in high-efficiency filtration

Edison Omollo1, Chuyang Zhang1, Josphat Igadwa Mwasiagi2

and Sizo Ncube1

Abstract
Cellulose acetate was dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid and electrospun onto polypro-
pylene non-woven material. An upstream layer of polypropylene non-woven material
was added to form a three-layered polypropylene/cellulose acetate/polypropylene filter.
The thickness of the electrospun cellulose acetate layer was varied by changing the
electrospinning time. The fabricated filter was then characterized. Cellulose acetate
nanofibers were also electrospun onto an aluminum foil collector with the aim of
studying the changes in fiber properties when they are electrospun onto the polypro-
pylene non-woven material. The results obtained in this research work indicated that
the layer of nanofibers electrospun onto polypropylene non-woven material increased
the filtration efficiency of polypropylene non-woven material from 50.23% to 91.29%,
but the quality factor reduced by 29.1%. When the cellulose acetate deposition time
was increased from 3 h to 6 h, the filtration efficiency further increased to 98.26% and
the quality factor increased by 0.6%. A comparison between cellulose acetate nanofi-
bers electrospun using an aluminum foil as the collector and those electrospun directly
onto the polypropylene non-woven material indicated that cellulose acetate fibers
electrospun onto polypropylene non-woven material had poorer fiber quality
properties.

Keywords
Cellulose acetate, electrospinning, nanofibers, high efficiency filtration

1
College of Textiles, Donghua University, Shanghai, China
2
iOTEX, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

Corresponding author:
Edison Omollo, College of Textiles, Donghua University, 2999 North Renmin Road, 210620 Shanghai, China.
Email: edisonomollo@gmail.com

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

2 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

Introduction
Electrospinning is a technique that uses high voltage to form a liquid jet from
polymer solutions. Fibers in the nano-scale range are formed as the charged poly-
mer solution is stretched continuously due to electrostatic repulsions of the surface
charges and the solvent [1]. This method of using electrical potential to draw fibers
was patented in 1934 by Formhals [2]. Since then, electrospun fibers have been used
in various fields which include filtration, electrical, and biomedical applications [3].
Many polymers have been electrospun and the polymer of choice and the spinning
solution is selected according to the intended application [4].
Cellulose acetate (CA) is a polymer obtained by substituting some of the
hydroxyl groups in cellulose. CA has good chemical resistance, is stable and
has good solubility in organic solvents [5]. CA also has the ability to selectively
absorb low-level organic compounds and toxicity, and hence has found applica-
tion in filtration especially in cigarette smoke filters [6]. CA nanofibers have been
electrospun from various solvents [7–12], and a report of its possible use in filter
materials has been published by Zhou et al. [11]. Nanofibers have good filtration
properties due to their fine fiber diameter, narrow fiber distribution range, and
high surface area. They, however, suffer from one major drawback: nanofibers
lack sufficient strength to be used as stand-alone filters. Attempts to address the
aforementioned drawback have been done by fabricating multi-layered filter
materials, where one of the layers is made up of nanofibers and the other
layers are made up of non-woven materials. In multi-layered filtration materials,
the nanofibers provide improved filtration properties [13], while the non-woven
layers provide support and strength [14]. Using the abovementioned approach,
several researchers [15–18] have designed multi-layered filter materials using dif-
ferent polymers (as nanofibers) and a variety of non-woven materials. Dotti et al.
[15] used three polymers (poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol), and polya-
mide-6) to electrospin nanofibers, which were combined with non-woven polyes-
ter material to design filtration material. Nanofibers electrospun from poly(vinyl
alcohol), poly(acrylonitrile), and polyamide-66 combined with polypropylene (PP)
non-woven material provided an opportunity to study the possibility of using
those nanofibers on PP non-woven material to design filtration material [16–18].
The web of nanofibers was reported to provide a much smaller pore size when
compared to the pore provided by the non-woven material. Therefore, the add-
ition of the web of nanofibers to the non-woven material produced better filtra-
tion material with higher filtration efficiency. The need for higher filtration
materials cannot be over-emphasized. Till date the use of CA nanofibers com-
bined with PP non-woven material has not been reported.
Given the good filtration properties of CA fibers, this study’s aim was to fab-
ricate multi-layered filtration material using PP non-woven and CA nanofibers.
The fabricated filtration material and the main elements of the filter (CA nanofibers
and PP non-woven material) were then characterized.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 3

Experimental
Materials
CA of molecular weight 30,000, acetyl content of 39.8%, and degree of substitution
of 2.5 in pellet form were purchased from Shanghai Deng Wei Zhangmutou
Plastics. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) solvent was purchased from Bepharm Ltd.,
Shanghai. PP melt blown non-woven material of basis weight 25 g/m2 used in this
study was also purchased from local suppliers.

CA solution preparation
CA solution of concentration 15 wt.% was prepared by dissolving CA pellets in
TFA. The solution was stirred for 24 h in a sealed glass container, using an elec-
tromagnetic stirrer to ensure homogenous mixing.

Electrospinning setup and process

The electrospinning equipment used in this research work had a syringe with a
needle having an internal diameter of 0.7 mm. The syringe was mounted onto a
syringe pump that was used to regulate the feed rate (kept constant at 0.3 ml/h).
The voltage used was 25 kV, and the tip to collector distance was 10 cm. CA
nanofibers were first electrospun onto the PP non-woven material using two sets
of time: 3 and 6 h. The CA/PP materials were combined with an upstream layer of
PP material (see Figure 1) to form a PP/CA/PP-3 and PP/CA/PP-6 for CA material
electrospun for 3 and 6 h, respectively. CA nanofibers were also electrospun using

Figure 1. Illustration of PP/CA/PP three-layered filter.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

4 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

an aluminum foil as the collector and were characterized. This was done with an
aim to study the changes in the structure of the nanofibers (if any) when the
electrospinning collector is varied.

Methods
The morphologies of CA nanofibers and PP non-woven material were observed
using scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Quanta 250). The fiber diameters were
measured from the SEM images using a measurement tool in Adobe Acrobat X
Pro 10.1.2.45 and further analyzed using Origin Pro v8.
The Brunauer-Emett-Teller (BET) surface area of CA nanofibers was calculated
from nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherm. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption
isotherm was measured using Micromeritics TriStar II 3020 (V1.03) at 77.350 K.
The pore size distribution of CA nanofibers, PP non-woven filter, and the three-
layered filter materials was analyzed using a porometer (Quantachrome Porometer
3G). The porometer uses liquid expulsion technique to measure through pore sizes.
A sample of 25 mm diameter was mounted on the machine and wetted on one side
using porofil (wetting fluid). Pressure (applied by pumping in gas) was applied to
the wetted side of the sample and the resulting flow rate measured. This was done
until the sample dried. A dry run (without the sample being wetted) was also done.
The dry run and wet run results were used to obtain pore size distribution data,
which were analyzed using Origin Pro v8.
Filtration efficiency and pressure drop of double-layered PP non-woven material
and that of PP/CA/PP-3 and PP/CA/PP-6 were determined using an Automated
Air Filter (Certitest, TSI Model 8130). Five samples were measured for each. This
machine uses two photometers to measure penetration of particles through a filter.
One photometer is placed before the filter and the other placed after the filter. The
signals from the photometers are proportional to the particle mass received.
The percentage particle penetration (p) is, therefore, obtained from the ratio of
the signal before and after filtration. The filtration efficiency () can be obtained
from penetration using the expression  = (1  p). The aerosol used in the equip-
ment was NaCl particles. Before the NaCl particles were used in the Automated
Air Filter, they were analyzed using TSI-3934 scanning mobility particle sizer.
Examination of the size distribution of NaCl particles generated showed that
they were within a mean diameter of 0.26 mm, count median diameter of
0.075 mm, and geometric deviation of less than 1.83, as specified for use in the
machine. The flow rate used to test the samples was 32 l/min.

Results and discussion

Fiber morphology and distribution
The CA nanofibers electrospun on aluminum foil and the PP non-woven material
were characterized using SEM and the results are given in Figures 2 and 3. The

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 5

Figure 2. SEM image and fiber distribution graph of electrospun CA nanofibers.

Figure 3. SEM image and fiber distribution graph of PP non-woven filter.

fiber distribution graph showed that the CA nanofibers had a uniform distribution
that deviated slightly from a normal distribution curve. The mean fiber diameter
ranged from 120 nm to 130 nm and exhibited a standard deviation of 36 nm.
The PP non-woven filter material on the other hand had a non-uniform fiber
distribution with a mean fiber diameter range of 2 mm to 4 mm as shown in Figure 3.
Its standard deviation was 1.81 mm.

The surface area of CA nanofibers

CA nanofibers electrospun using aluminum foil as the collector were tested using
BET method and the adsorption–desorption isotherms obtained are shown in
Figure 4. From the shape of the isotherm, it can be inferred that the isotherms
correspond to type II adsorption. Using International Union of Pure and Applied

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

6 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

Chemistry classification, it can be inferred that CA nanofibers have macropores,

that is to say the size of the nanofibers ranged from 50 nm to 1 mm [19].
The adsorption–desorption curve is open-ended. Open-end adsorption–desorp-
tion curves have been reported to be a phenomenon associated with certain carbon
containing materials. This occurs due to changes in the bulk density of the nano-
fibers, caused by nitrogen adsorption or irreversible nitrogen adsorption. It may
also be due to retarded adsorption, where a certain energy barrier has to be
exceeded by adsorbing and desorbing molecules [20]. The amount of nitrogen
gas physically adsorbed by the pores of nanofiber samples gives an indication of
the size and distribution of pores.
A BET plot obtained between relative pressure 0.065 and 0.20 was used to
estimate the surface area of CA nanofibers. The BET surface area was then calcu-
lated from the slope and intercept of BET plot using BET equation. The BET
surface area obtained for the CA nanofibers electrospun using an aluminum foil
as the collector was 11.75 m2/g.
CA nanofibers electrospun using acetone/dimethylacetamide were reported to
exhibit a BET surface area of 2.9 m2/g [21]; therefore, the BET surface area of the
CA nanofibers electrospun in this research work exhibited a much larger BET
surface area (11.75 m2/g). It can, therefore, be concluded that CA nanofibers elec-
trospun using TFA as the solvent have a much higher potential in the fabrication of
filter material since it has a higher surface area, which is a desirable characteristic in
high-efficiency filtration material.

Figure 4. Gas adsorption desorption isotherm of CA nanofibers.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 7

Pore size and distribution

CA nanofibers gathered on aluminum foil collector and double-layered PP non-
woven materials were analyzed for pore size and distribution. The graphs are
shown in Figure 5. The mean pore size was 0.463 mm and 15.640 mm for CA
nanofibers and PP non-woven material, respectively. The pore size distribution
for CA nanofibers had a narrower range with the minimum pore size being
0.393 mm and maximum pore size being 0.934 mm. The mean pore size of
0.463 mm confirmed that CA nanofibers contain macropores (50 nm–1 mm).

Figure 5. Pore size and distribution for: (a) CA nanofibers (b) PP non-woven filter.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

8 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

The PP non-woven material showed a wide pore size range of 10.802 mm and
28.344 mm for the minimum and maximum pore size, respectively. The wider pores
and wider pore size distribution range are not desirable for high filtration efficiency
filters.

Filtration efficiency
The double-layered PP non-woven and the fabricated three-layered filters were
tested for filtration efficiency. The average filtration efficiency results for PP non-
woven material, PP/CA/PP-3, and PP/CA/PP-6 were plotted in a graph as shown
in Figure 6. The standard deviation was 2.14% and 0.927% for the PP/CA/PP-3
and PP/CA/PP-6 filter materials, respectively. It was evident that the addition of
CA nanofibrous layer onto PP non-woven material increased the filtration effi-
ciency from 50.23% to 91.29% for PP/CA/PP-3. In this research work, the pore
size for a web of CA nanofibers and PP non-woven material was 0.463 mm and
15.64 mm, respectively. Therefore, the increase in filtration efficiency in the PP/CA/
PP-3 filtration material could be attributed to the addition of the CA nanofibers
which were characterized by a smaller pore size. Similar results were obtained by
other researchers who used other types of nanofibers combined with non-woven
materials to fabricate filter materials [16–18].
When the thickness of CA nanofibrous layer was increased (by changing the
Electrospinning time from 3 h to 6 h), the filtration efficiency further increased from
91.29% to 98.26%. This could be due to the fact that a thicker nanofibrous layer
would increase depth filtration, leading to an increase in filtration efficiency.

Figure 6. Graph of average filtration efficiency.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 9

The basis weight of the non-woven increased by 8.6% and by 18.1% when CA was
deposited for 3 h and 6 h, respectively.
Many national and international standards for testing particulate filters exist
[22]. Several types of aerosols are also available for measuring filtration efficiency,
but NaCl is commonly used. Since the machine used in this research work to
evaluate the filtration efficiency conforms to BS EN 1822-5: 2009 standards, the
efficiency obtained can be compared with the standard recommendations. The fil-
tration efficiency obtained from the three-layered PP/CA/PP-6 material can be
classified as an EPA filter of class E11. Since the NaCl particles used had a
mean mass diameter of 0.26 mm, for an efficiency of 98.26% (for PP/CA/PP-6)
only 1.74% of the NaCl particle managed to penetrate the filter. Given that the
filtration efficiency for the PP/CA/PP-3 sample was 91.29% and the penetration
was 8.71%, the PP/CA/PP-6 sample can be deemed to be a better filtration mater-
ial. Therefore, the improvement of the filtration efficiency can be attributed to the
increase in the thickness of the CA nanofiber layer.
Filtration involves the combination of different mechanisms. Each filter material
combines different mechanisms to efficiently eliminate different particle sizes.
Common filtration mechanisms include: direct interception, inertial impaction,
and Brownian diffusion. Particles of 1–10 mm are filtered through inertial impac-
tion. This occurs when heavy particles, due to their motion, are thrown onto the
fibers of a filter material and are retained due to their high inertia. The heavy
particles will be filtered by the non-woven layer. Particles having a size range of
0.3 mm to 1 mm are filtered through direct interception by the nanofibrous layer.
This mechanism occurs when particles come into contact with the filter medium
and are held by weak forces (van der Waals) and remain trapped. These trapped
particles can also be used to trap other particles. Particles of less than 0.3 mm
traveling in Brownian motion attempt to go through the fiber and in the process
get trapped inside the fiber. This mechanism is called diffusion. It has been reported
that nanofibrous layers are responsible for diffusion filtration [23,24]. Considering
the characteristic of the PP/CA/PP filter material fabricated and tested in this
research work, it can be concluded that the PP/CA/PP filter material can be used
as ULPA filter, if the CA nanofibrous layer is increased to enhance diffusion.

Pressure drop and quality factor

The average pressure drop for PP non-woven, PP/CA/PP-3, and PP/CA/PP-6 filter
materials is given in Table 1. The standard deviation for pressure drop was 2.685
mmH2O for PP/CA/PP-3 and 3.377 mmH2O for PP/CA/PP-6. The pressure drop
for the PP non-woven material sample was lower than that of the PP/CA/PP-3
sample. This could be due to the fact that the addition of the nanofibrous layer to
the PP leads to the increase in resistance to airflow through the filter media [25].
On increasing the deposition time of CA nanofibers in the PP/CA/PP-6 sample,
the pressure drop decreased to 26.7 mmH2O. This was a deviation from the
generally accepted trend.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

10 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

Graham et al. [26] reported that for fibers with diameters smaller than 500 nm,
slip flow must be considered. Normally, filtration theory assumes a continuous flow
around fibers in a filter, with no slip at the surface of fibers. For nano-scale fibers,
this assumption becomes invalid because the fibers have a smaller diameter; hence,
molecular movement of air molecules is significant when compared to the fiber size
and field of flow. It is because of slip (at fiber surfaces) that drag force on the fiber
is reduced. Slip flow is also reported to cause more air to flow near a fiber surface,
thus causing an increase in filtration efficiency through increase in diffusion and
interception [26]. Since the average diameter for CA nanofibers used in the fabri-
cation of PP/CA/PP material was below 500 nm, it can be assumed that slip flow
occurred. The reduction in pressure drop from 55.5 mmH2O in PP/CA/PP-3 to
26.7 mmH2O in PP/CA/PP-6 could, therefore, be attributed to slip flow.
Increasing the layer of CA in PP/CA/PP-6 (by increasing the deposition time), a
denser web of nanofibers was formed on the PP/CA/PP-6 material. Since it is
known that slip flow occurs at the fiber surface, it follows that in PP/CA/PP-6,
more fibers were exposed at the surface than in PP/CA/PP-3. This could be one of
the possible causes of reduced pressure drop in PP/CA/PP-6. As mentioned earlier,
CA on PP/CA/PP-3 led to a mass increase of 8.6% and 18.1% in PP/CA/PP-6.
This shows that on increasing the deposition time (from 3 h to 6 h) the mass of CA
deposited was doubled. Although the deposition of CA appeared to be uniform,
there might have been slight variations throughout the filter since electrospinning
jet is random. This slight unevenness in deposition of CA could also have caused a
reduction in pressure drop in PP/CA/PP-6.
To further understand the performance of the filter samples the Quality factor
(Q) was calculated, using the values of average pressure drop and average pene-
tration (1-average filtration efficiency). This quantity (equation (1)) is unit-less and
measures the performance of a filter. A larger Q factor indicates a better filter
performance.

 lnðPenetrationÞ
Q¼ ð1Þ
pressureDrop

The results of Q factor are shown in Table 1. The Q factor shows that despite the
increase in filtration efficiency in PP/CA/PP-3, the performance is still low when

Table 1. Average pressure drop and quality factor results.

Average pressure Average Q factor

Filter drop (mmH2O) penetration (%) Q factor ratio

PP non-woven 4.63 49.76 0.1507

PP/CA/PP-3 55.5 8.71 0.0439 0.291
PP/CA/PP-6 26.7 1.74 0.1517 1.006

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 11

compared to that of PP non-woven without the nanofibrous layer. This is because a

good filter is not only evaluated by its filtration efficiency but also by its pressure
drop. CA nanofibrous layer electrospun for 3 h gave a higher pressure drop. When
the nanofibrous layer was electrospun for 6 h in PP/CA/PP-6, the Q factor
increased. A high Q factor indicates a filter of better performance. From Q
factor ratios, comparison of the PP non-woven material and the PP/CA/PP-6
showed an improvement of 0.6%. This seems like a small improvement, but
when the filtration efficiencies are compared, PP/CA/PP-6 filter material would
be adjudged to be a better filtration material.

Further analysis of PP/CA/PP-6

Since the three-layered filter obtained by electrospinning CA onto PP non-woven
for 6 h (PP/CA/PP-6) had a better filtration efficiency and a lower pressure drop,
further analysis of pore size and pore size distribution was undertaken and the
results are given in Figure 7.
The mean pore size for the PP/CA/PP-6 material was 1.267 mm, and the pore size
range was 0.710 mm and 2.577 mm for minimum and maximum pore size,
respectively.
Comparing the pore size of the CA nanofibers electrospun onto aluminum foil,
which was 0.463 mm, the PP/CA/PP-6 can be adjudged to be a poorer filtration
material; however, CA nanofibers cannot be used as stand-alone filtration material
due to poorer mechanical strength. A double layer of PP non-woven recorded a
pore size of 15.64 mm, which implies that the PP/CA/PP-6 is a better filtration
material than a double layer of PP non-woven material.

Figure 7. Pore size and distribution for PP/CA/PP-6.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

12 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

The pore size distribution for the PP/CA/PP-6 material was wider (0.393–
0.934 mm for CA nanofibers electrospun on aluminum foil and 0.710–2.577 mm
for CA nanofibers electrospun onto PP and used in the PP/CA/PP-6 filter
material).
An analysis of the properties of the CA nanofibers electrospun directly onto the
PP material and used in the fabrication of the PP/CA/PP-6 material was under-
taken with an aim of trying to understand the contribution of the CA nanofibers in
the filtration property of the PP/CA/PP-6 material.
The SEM image and fiber distribution of CA electrospun directly onto the PP
non-woven material are given in Figure 8. The CA nanofibers deposited onto PP
non-woven material to form PP/CA/PP-6 filter had larger diameter ranging from
300 to 400 nm compared to those electrospun onto aluminum foil which were 120–
130 nm. They also had a non-uniform fiber distribution with a wider range. The
difference in CA nanofiber morphology, pore size, and distribution, could be attrib-
uted to the differences in collector properties.
It is known that polymer solutions travel towards the collector screen of an
electrospinning equipment because of charge differences. The dissipation of the
residual charge determines how fibers interact with each other and their arrange-
ment in the membrane. Non-conducting surfaces tend to get less fiber deposition,
leading to lower packing density. This is due to the accumulation of repulsive
forces on the surface of a non-conducting collector. For collector with higher
conductivity (like aluminum foil), charges are easily dissipated thus allowing attrac-
tion of more fibers. The porosity of the collector may also affect the deposition of
nanofibers on a collector screen. Porous materials produce low packing density
compared to smooth surfaces like foils [4,12]. Due to the above reasons, the CA
nanofibers electrospun onto aluminum foil had different fiber morphology, pore
size, and pore size distribution when compared to CA electrospun onto PP non-
woven collector, which was porous and had lower conductivity.

Figure 8. SEM image and fiber distribution graph of CA nanofibers deposited on PP non-woven.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

Omollo et al. 13

Conclusion
The electrospinning of CA nanofibers and its use in high efficiency filtration were
investigated. According to the results obtained in this research work, it can be
concluded that the increase in the thickness of the CA nanofiber layer improved
filtration efficiency. Pressure drop was found to reduce at high CA deposition time.
Based on the performance of the PP/CA/PP filter, it was adjudged to be a high-
efficiency filtration material. When the nanofibers were electrospun onto non-
woven material during fabrication of the PP/CA/PP filter, the properties of the
CA nanofibers were adversely affected compared to those electrospun using an
aluminum foil as the collector surface.

Conflict of interest
None declared.

Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors.

References
[1] Li D and Xia Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv Mater
2004; 16: 1151–1170.
[2] Subbiah T, Bhat G, Tock R, et al. Electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci
2005; 96: 557–569.
[3] Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, et al. A review on polymer nanofibers by electro-
spinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2003; 63:
2223–2253.
[4] Ramakrishna S, Kazutoshi F, Teo WE, et al. An introduction to electrospinning and
nanofibers. 5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2005,
p.42,108.
[5] Han SO, Youk JH, Min KD, et al. Electrospinning of cellulose acetate nanofibers using
a mixed solvent of acetic acid/water: Effects of solvent composition on the fiber diam-
eter. Mater Lett 2008; 62: 759–762.
[6] Frederick TJ, Mitchell MG and Partin LR. Process for preparation of cellulose acetate
filters for use in paper making. Google Patents, USA, 1997.
[7] Liu H and Tang C. Electrospinning of cellulose acetate in solvent mixture N,
N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/acetone. Polym J 2006; 39: 65–72.
[8] Son WK, Youk JH, Lee TS, et al. Electrospinning of ultrafine cellulose acetate fibers:
Studies of a new solvent system and deacetylation of ultrafine cellulose acetate fibers.
J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 2003; 42: 5–11.
[9] Tungprapa S, Puangparn T, Weerasombut M, et al. Electrospun cellulose acetate fibers:
Effect of solvent system on morphology and fiber diameter. Cellulose 2007; 14:
563–575.
[10] Ma Z, Kotaki M and Ramakrishna S. Electrospun cellulose nanofiber as affinity mem-
brane. J Membr Sci 2005; 265: 115–123.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

XML Template (2014) [17.6.2014–5:54pm] [1–14]
//blrnas3/cenpro/ApplicationFiles/Journals/SAGE/3B2/JITJ/Vol00000/140035/APPFile/SG-JITJ140035.3d (JIT) [-
PREPRINTER stage]

14 Journal of Industrial Textiles 0(00)

[11] Zhou W, He J, Cui S, et al. Studies of electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibrous mem-
branes. Open Mater Sci J 2011; 5: 51–55.
[12] Liu H and Hsieh YL. Ultrafine fibrous cellulose membranes from electrospinning of
cellulose acetate. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 2002; 40: 2119–2129.
[13] Grafe T and Graham K. Polymeric nanofibers and nanofiber webs: A new class of
nonwovens. Nonwoven Technol Rev 2003; 12: 51–55.
[14] Montefusco AsF. The use of Nonwovens in air filtration. Filtrat Separ 2005; 42: 30–31.
[15] Dotti F, Varesano A, Montarsolo A, et al. Electrospun porous mats for high efficiency
filtration. J Ind Textil 2007; 37: 151–162.
[16] Qin XH and Wang SY. Filtration properties of electrospinning nanofibers. J Appl
Polym Sci 2006; 102: 1285–1290.
[17] Kim K, Lee C, Kim IW, et al. Performance modification of a melt-blown filter medium
via an additional nano-web layer prepared by electrospinning. Fibers Polym 2009; 10:
60–64.
[18] Wang N, Wang X, Ding B, et al. Tunable fabrication of three-dimensional polyamide-
66 nano-fiber/nets for high efficiency fine particulate filtration. J Mater Chem 2012; 22:
1445–1452.
[19] Pierotti R and Rouquerol J. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with
special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem
1985; 57: 603–619.
[20] Polarz S, Smarsly B and Schattka JH. Hierachical porous carbon structures from cel-
lulose acetate fibers. Chem Mater 2002; 14: 2940–2945.
[21] Huang X. Nanotechnology research: new nanostructures, nanotubes and nanofibers.
Hauppauge, New York: Nova Publishers, 2008, pp.145–146.
[22] Shaffer RE and Rengasamy S. Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles:
A review. J Nanopart Res 2009; 11: 1661–1672.
[23] Barhate R and Ramakrishna S. Nanofibrous filtering media: Filtration problems and
solutions from tiny materials. J Membr Sci 2007; 296: 1–8.
[24] Sutherland KS. Filters and filtration handbook, 5th edn. Oxford, UK: Elsevier limited,
2008, p.16.
[25] Zhang S, Shim WS and Kim J. Design of ultra-fine nonwovens via electrospinning of
Nylon 6: Spinning parameters and filtration efficiency. Mater Des 2009; 30: 3659–3666.
[26] Graham K, Ouyang M, Raether T, et al. Polymeric nanofibers in air filtration appli-
cations. In: Proceedings of the fifteen annual technical conference and expo of the
American filtration and separations society, Galveston, Texas, 2002.

Downloaded from jit.sagepub.com by guest on June 19, 2014

View publication stats