Private International Law Bibliography 2009-10: U.S.

and Foreign Sources in English

Author(s): SYMEON C. SYMEONIDES
Source: The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 59, No. 2 (SPRING 2011), pp. 395-410
Published by: American Society of Comparative Law
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23045666
Accessed: 14-11-2015 21:46 UTC

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/
info/about/policies/terms.jsp

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content
in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.
For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

American Society of Comparative Law is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American
Journal of Comparative Law.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
 SYMEON C. SYMEONIDES*

Private International Law Bibliography 2009-10:

U.S. and Foreign Sources in Englishf

Table of Contents

1. General 395 15. Succession 402

2. PIL Codifications 396 16. Jurisdiction and Procedure . 402
3. Torts 396 17. Tribal Jurisdiction 404
4. Contracts 397 18. Class Actions 404
5. Employment Contracts 398
19. Sovereign Immunity 405
6. Commercial Law 398
20. Extraterritoriality 405
7. E-Commerce and Internet ... 399
21. Foreign Affairs 406
8. Intellectual Property 399
22. PIL and International Law . 406
9. Corporations 399
10. Cultural 400 23. Harmonization or
Property
11. PIL and Culture 400 Unification 406
12. Maritime Conflicts 400 24. Foreign Judgments 407
13. Family Law 401 25. Arbitration 408
14. Marital Property 402 26. Miscellaneous 410

1. General International Conflicts: Liber Amicor

um Tibor Varady (2009).
A. Books
Hay (P.), Borchers (P.) & Symeonides
Agrawal (k), Private International Law (S.), Conflict of Laws (5th eds. 2010).
in India (2010). Hoffheimer (M.), Conflict of Laws: Ex
Boele-Woelki (K.), Einhorn (T.), Gir & Explanations (2010).
amples
sberger (D.) & Symeonides (S.) (eds.), and Laws
Nickel (R.), Conflict of Laws
Convergence and Divergence in Private
of Conflict in Europe and Beyond:
International Law: Liber Amicorum
Patterns of Supranational and Trans
Kurt Siehr (2010). national Juridification (2010).
Currie (D.), Kay (H.), Kramer (L.) &
Pitel (S.) & Rafferty (N.), Conflict of
Roosevelt (K.), Conflict of Laws, Laws (2010).
Cases, Comments, Questions (8th ed.
2010).
Rafferty (N.), Blom (J.) & Edinger (E.),
Private International Law in Common
Davies (M.), Bell (A.) & Bereton (P.),
Law Canada: Cases, Text, and Materi
Nygh's Conflict of Laws in Australia
als (2010).
(2010).
Felix Mozingo (J.) & Whitten Roosevelt (K.), Conflict of Laws (2010).
(R), (R.),
American Conflicts Law: Cases and Spillenger (C.), Principles of Conflict of
Materials (5th ed.) (2010). Laws (2010).
Hay (P.), Lajos VfiKAs (L.), Elkana (Y.) Stone (P.), EU Private International
& Dimitrijevic (N.) (eds.), Resolving Law (2d ed. 2010).

* Dean and Alex L. Parks Professor of Law, Willamette Univer

Distinguished
sity College of Law.
This bibliography includes books and articles in journals (but not in books) that
were published in 2010, or earlier but not included in the 2009 bibliography (see 58
L. 307 (2010)). In each subdivision, books are listed first. The subdivi
Am.J.Comp.
sions are not arranged in alphabetical order.
t DOI 10.5131/AJCL.2011.0002

395

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
396 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Weintraub (R.), Commentary on the 2. PIL Codifications

Conflict of Laws (6th ed. 2010).
Ansay (T.), The Anatomy of Turkey's
B. Articles New Private International Law Re
gime, 74 RabelsZ 393 (2010).
Bailey (M.), Developments in Private In Erpyleva (N.) & Getman-Pavlova (I.),
ternational Law, 48 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. Russian on Pri
Improving Legislation
267 (2009). vate International 2009 Russ. L.
Law,
Basedow (J.), Theory of Choice of Law, Theory & Pract. 204 (2009).
75 RabelsZ 32 (2011). Gray (A.), Reform of Rules of Private In
Brilmayer (L.) & Anglin (R.), Choice of ternational Law in Manitoba: A
Law Theory and the Metaphysics of Comparative Perspective, 2(4) J. Pol.
the Stand-Alone Trigger, 95 Iowa L. & L., 26 (2009).
Rev. 1125 (2010). Nafziger (J.), The Louisiana and Oregon
Einhorn (T.), American Private Interna Codifications of Choice-of-Law Rules in
tional Law, 74 RabelsZ 895 (2010). Context, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 165 (2010
Forsyth (C.), Certainty Versus Uniform Supp.).
ity: Renvoi in the Context of Movable Opertti BadAn (D.) & Fresnedo de
Property, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 637 (2010). Aguirre (C.), The Latest Trends in
George Latin American Private International
(J.), Marshall (S.) & Carroll
Conflict of Laws, 63 SMU L. Rev. Law: The Uruguayan 2009 General
(W.),
455 (2010). Law on Private International Law, 11
Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 305 (2009).
Hughes (D.), The
Insolubility of Renvoi
Symeonides (S.), Oregon's New Choice
and its Consequences, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L.
of-Law Codification for Tort Conflicts:
195 (2010).
An Exegesis, 88 Or. L. Rev. 963 (2009).
McEleavy (P.) & Perreau-Saussine (L.),
Talpis (J.) & Goldstein (G.), The Influ
Private International Law, 59 Int'l &
ence of Swiss Law on Quebec's 1994
Comp. L. Q. 505 (2010). Codification of Private International
Michaels (R.), After the Revolution B
Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 339 (2009).
Decline and Return of U.S. Conflict of
Tu (G.), The Conflict of Laws System in
Laws, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 11 (2009).
Macau, 40 Hong Kong L. J. 85 (2010).
Minow (M.) & Singer (J.), In Favor of
Vassilakakis (E.), Recent Private Inter
Foxes: Pluralism as Fact and Aid to
national Law Codifications, 63 Rev.
the Pursuit of Justice, 90 B.U. L. Rev.
903 (2010). Hellenique Dr. Int'l 103 (2010).
Vlas (P.), On the Development of Private
Oppong (R.), Private International Law International Law in the Netherlands:
Scholarship in Africa (1884-2009): A From Asser's Day to the Codification of
Selected Bibliography, 58 Am. J. Dutch Private International Law, 57
Comp. L. 319 (2010).
Neth. Int'l L. Rev. 167 (2010).
Pitel (S.), Reformulating a Real and Wurdinger (M.), The Principle of Unity
Substantial Connection, 60 U. N. Br. L. in the European Private International
J. 177 (2010). Law and Procedural Law Governing
Reyhan (P.), Conflict of Laws, 60 Syr. L. Contractual and Non-Contractual
Rev. 769 (2010). Obligations: A Methodological Examin
Sloane (R.), Breaking the Genuine Link: ation of the Practical Concordance Be
The Contemporary International Legal tween the Brussels I, Rome I and
Regulation of Nationality, 50 Harv. Rome II Regulations, 75 RabelsZ 102
Int'l L. J. 1 (2009). (2011).
Symeonides (S.), Choice of Law in the
American Courts in 2009: 3. Torts
Twenty
Third Annual Survey, 58 Am. J. Comp.
L. 227 (2010). A. Books

Symeonides (S.), A Dedication to Profes Brower (A.), Libel Tourism and Foreign
sor P. John Kozyris, 58 Am. J. Comp. Libel Lawsuits (2011).
L. 221 (2010).
B. Articles
Symeonides (S.), Private International
Law Bibliography 2008-09: U.S. and Arons (T.), 'All Roads Lead to Rome': Be
Foreign Sources in English, 58 Am. J. ware of the Consequences! The Law
Comp. L. 307 (2010). Applicable to Prospectus Liability

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 3 97

Claims under the Rome II Regulation, tions Arising out of Acts of Unfair
2008 Nederl. IPR. 481 (2008). Competition and Acts Restricting Free
Borchers Punitive Fo Competition under Article 6 Rome II
(P.), Damages,
rum and the Conflict of Regulation, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 435
Shopping,
Laws, 70 La. L. Rev.529 (2010). (2008).
Cohen Patients with Schoeman (E.), Rome II and the Sub
(I.),Protecting
Medical Tourism and the stance-Procedure Dichotomy: Crossing
Passports:
Patient-Protective 95 Iowa the Rubicon, 2010 Lloyd's Marit. &
Argument,
L. Rev. 1467 (2010).
Comm. L. Q. 81 (2010).
Cortez (N.), Recalibrating the Legal
Schwartze (A.), A European Regime on

of Cross-Border Health 10 International Product Liability: Article

Risks Care,
J. Health & Ethics 1 5 Rome II Regulation, 2008 Nederl.
Yale Pol'y (L.)
(2010). IPR. 430 (2008).
Siehr (K.), The Rome II Regulation and
De Boer (T.), The Purpose of Uniform
Specific Maritime Torts: Product Lia
Choice-of-Law Rules: The Rome II Reg
bility, Environmental Damage,
ulation, 56 Neth. Int'l L. Rev. 295
Industrial Action, 74 RabelsZ 139
(2009).
Tourism' and
(2010).
Hartley (T.), 'Libel Con
Taylor (D.), Libel Tourism: Protecting
flict of Laws, 59 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 25
Authors and Preserving Comity, 99
(2010).
Geo. L. J. 189 (2010).
He (Q.), Recent Developments with Re
Thoma (I.), Culpa in Contrahendo in the
gards to Choice of Law in Tort in
Rome II Regulation, 61 Rev. Hellenique
China, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 211 (2009).
Dr. Int'l 669 (2008).
Heinze (C.), Industrial Action in the
Volders (B.), Culpa in Contrahendo in
Conflict of Laws, 73 RabelsZ 770
the Conflict of Laws: A First Appraisal
(2009). of Article 12 of the Rome II Regulation,
Kadner Graziano (T.), The Rome II Reg 2008 Nederl. IPR. 464 (2008).
ulation andthe Hague Conventions on
Wadlow (C.), The New Private Interna
Traffic Accidents and Product Liabil
tional Law of Unfair Competition and
ity—Interaction, Conflicts and Future
the 'Rome II' Regulation, 4 J. Intell.
Perspectives, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 425
Prop. L. & Prac. 789 (2009).
(2008). Wilderspin The Rome II
(M.), Regula
Kaminsky (C.), The Rome II Regulation: 2008
tion: Some Policy Observations,
A Comparative Perspective on Federal IPR.
Nederl. 408 (2008).
izing Choice of Law, 85 Tul. L. Rev. 55
(2010). 4. Contracts
Keyes (M.), Substance and Procedure in
Multistate Tort Litigation, 18 Torts L.
A. Books
J. 201 (2010).
Kramer The Rome
(X.), II Regulation on KERSTIN (S.), Application of Mandatory
the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Rules in the Private International Law

Obligations: The European Private In of Contracts (2010).

ternational Law Tradition Continued.
B. Articles
Introductory Observations, Scope, Sys
tem, and General Rules, 2008 Nederl. Al-Emadi Stabilization Clauses in
(T.),
IPR. 414 (2008). International Joint Venture Agree
Nagy (C.),The Rome II Regulation and ments, 3 Int'l Energy L. 54 (2010).
Traffic Accidents: Uniform Conflict of Law in Interna
Albornoz (M.), Choice
Rules with Some Room for Forum tional Contracts in Latin American
- How So?, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. L. 23
Shopping Legal Systems, 6 J. Priv. Int'l
93 (2010). (2010).
Pitel (S.), Choice of Law for Unjust En Bierman (B.) & Struycken (T.), Rome I
richment: Rome II and the Common on Contracts Concluded Within Multi
Law, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 456 (2008). lateral Systems, 2009 Nederl. IPR. 416
Requejo (M.), Punitive
Isidro Damages (2009).
from a Private International Law Per Bogdan (M.), The Rome I Regulation on
spective, 25 Tort & Ins. L. 237 (2009). the Law Applicable to Contractual Ob
Rosenkranz (T.) & Rohde (E.), The Law ligations and the Choice of Law by the

Applicable to Non-Contractual Obliga Parties, 2009 Nederl. IPR. 407 (2009).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
 398 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Bridge (M.), The Proprietary Aspects of Walsh (C.), The Uses and Abuses of
Assignment and Choice of Law, 125 L. Party Autonomy in International Con
Q. Rev. 671 (2009). tracts, 60 U. N. Br. L. J. 12 (2010).
De Lisle (J.) & Thujillo (E.), Consumer Wolff (L.), Hong Kong's Conflict of Con
Protection in Transnational Contexts, tract Laws: Quo Vadis?, 6 J. Priv. Int'l
58 Am. J. Comp. L. 135 (2010 Supp.). L. 465 (2010).
Eisenberg (T.) & Miller (G.), The Flight Xiao (Y.) & Long (W.), Contractual Party
to New York: An Empirical Study of Autonomy in Chinese Private Interna
Choice of Law of Forum Clauses in tional Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 193
Publicly-Held 'Companies' Contracts, (2009).
30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1475 (2009). Yeo (T.), Breach of Agreements on
Fernandez Arroyo Current Choice of Law, 2010 Lloyd's Marit. &
(D.), Ap
Towards Harmonization of Comm. L. Q. 194 (2010).
proaches
Consumer Private International Law
in the Americas, 58 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 5. Employment Contracts
411 (2009). Goulding & Vinall The En
(P.) (M.),
Heinze (C.), Insurance Contracts under glish Approach to Jurisdiction and
the Rome I Regulation, 2009 Nederl. Choice of Law
in Employment Cove
Int'l Priv. 445 (2009). nants Not to Compete, 31 Comp. Lab.
Hill (J.), Article 6 of the Rome I Regula L. & Pol'y 375 (2010).
tion: Much Ado About Nothing, 2009 Lester (G.) & Ryan (E.), Choice of Law
Nederl. IPR. 437 (2009). and Employee Restrictive Covenants:
Kuipers (J.), Party Autonomy in the An American Perspective, 31 Comp.
Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Reg Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 389 (2010).
ulation and the European Court of Mahnhold (T.), Choice of Law Provisions
Justice, 10 German L. J. 1055 (2009). in Contractual Covenants Not to Com
Maultzsch (F.), Choice of Law and I us pete: The German Approach, 31 Comp.
Cogens in Conflict of Laws for Contrac Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 331 (2010).
tual Obligations, 75 RabelsZ 60 (2011). Menegatti (E.), The Choice of Law in
O'Connor (G.), When in Rome: An Ex Employment Contracts: Covenants
amination of Article 4 of the Rome Not to Compete under the Italian Leg
on the Governing Law of Inter islation, 31 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J.
Regime
national Contracts, 9 Hibernian L. J. 799 (2010).
39 (2010). Stewart (A.) & Greene (J.), Choice of
Papassiopi-Passia Law and
the Enforcement of Post-Em
(Z.), Consumer Protec
tion in Greek Private International ployment Restraints in Australia, 31

Law, 63 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 79 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 305 (2010).
(2010). Yamakawa (R.), Transnational Dimen
PauknerovA sion of Japanese Labor and Employ
(M.), Law Applicable to Ob
in the European Union: Some ment Laws: New Choice of Law Rules
ligations
on the Borderline and Determination of Geographical
Questions (Procedu
ral and Unilateral 61 Reach, 31 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 347
Undertakings),
Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 531 (2008). (2010).
Rohl (G.), The Problem of International
6. Commercial Law
Transactions: Conflict of Laws Revis
ited, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 59 (2010). A. Books
Symeonides (S.), Party Autonomy in
Hill (J.) & Chong (A.), International
Rome I and II: An Outsider's Perspec
Commercial Disputes: Commercial
tive, 2009 Nederl. IPR. 191 (2010).
Conflict of Laws in English Courts (4th
Takahashi (K.), for Breach of a
Damages ed. 2010).
Choice-of-Court Agreement: Remain
Sigman (H.) & Kieninger (E-M.), Cross
ing Issues, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 73
Border Security over Receivables
(2009).
(2009).
Tang (Z.), Private International Law in
Consumer Contracts: A European Per B. Articles

spective, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 225 (2010). Druzin Commercial Law:

(B.), Buying
Verhagen (H.) & van Dongen (S.), Cross Choice of Law, Choice of Forum, and
-Border Assignments under Rome I, 6 Network Externalities, 18 Tul. J. Int'l
J. Priv. Int'l L. 1 (2010). & Comp. L. 131 (2009).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 3 99

Schobel (T.), Telos Versus Unilateral Fawcett (J.) & Torremans (P.), Intellec
ism: Cross-Border Banking Business tual Property and Private Inter
and the International Applicability of national Law (2d ed. 2011).
Domestic Banking Law, 63 Con. Fin. L.
B. Articles
Q. Rep. 177 (2009).
Bariatti (S.), The Law Applicable to Se
curity Interests in Intellectual
7. E-Commerce and Internet
Property Rights, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 395
(2010).
A, Books
Dinwoodie (G.), Developing a Private In
Collins (M.), The Law of Defamation ternational Intellectual Property Law:
and the Internet (3d ed. 2011). The Demise of Territoriality?, 51 Wm.
European Directorate & M. L. Rev. 711 (2009).
Parliament,
General for Research, The Impact of La Belle (M.), Patent Litigation, Per
Private International Law on E-Com sonal Jurisdiction, and the Public
merce: Problems Raised by Introducing Good, 18 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 43 (2010).
the Country of Destination Principle Okuda, (Y.), Initial Ownership of Copy
(2010). right in a
Cinematographic Work
Spindler (G.) & BOrner (F.), E-Com under Japanese Private International
merce Law in Europe and the USA Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 375 (2009).
(2010). Perraki (M.), Patent Infringement and
Tang (Z.), Electronic Consumer Contracts Private International Law Issues in
in the Conflict of Laws (2009). Greece, 62 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 413
Wang (F.), Internet Jurisdiction and (2009).
Choice of Law: Legal Practices in the Reichman (J.), Rethinking the Role of
EU, US and China (2010). Clinical Trial Data in International In
tellectual Property Law: The Case for a
B. Articles Public Goods Approach, 2009 Marq. In
tel. Prop. Rev. 1 (2009).
Kuner (C.), Data Protection Law and In
Ubertazzi (B.), Intellectual Property and
ternational Jurisdiction on the
State Immunity from Jurisdiction in
Internet (Part 2), 18 Int'l J. Law & Inf.
the New York Convention of 2004, 11
Tech. 227 (2010).
Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 1 (2009).
Janger (E.), Virtual Territoriality, 48
Van Engelen (D.), Rome II and Intellec
Col. J. Transn'l L. 401 (2010).
tual Property Rights: Choice of Law
Maier (B.), How Has the Law Attempted
Brought to a Standstill, 2008 Nederl.
to Tackle the Borderless Nature of the
IPR. 440 (2008).
Internet?, 18 Int'l J. L. & Inf. Tech. 142
Woodhouse (M.), Shop Til You Drop: Im
(2010). Federal Rules of Patent
plementing
Monteiro (F.), Internet Sales and Con
Litigation Procedure to Wear out Fo
flicts, 2010 New Zealand L. J. 49
rum Shopping Patent Plaintiffs, 99
(2010). Geo. L. J. 227 (2010).
Munoz-LOpez (J.), Internet Conflict of
Laws: A Space of Opportunities for 9. Corporations
ODR, 14 Rev. Colomb. Der. Int'l 163
Borg-Barthet (J.), New Approach to the
(2009).
Governing Law of Companies in the
EU: A Legislative Proposal, 6 J. Priv.
8. Intellectual Property
Int'l L. 589 (2010).
Borg-Barthet (J.), European Private In
A. Books
ternational Law of Companies after

Bariatti Intellectual Cartesio, 58 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 1020

(S.) (ed.), Litigating
Property Rights Disputes Cross-Border: (2009).
EU Regulations, ALI Principles, CLIP Buxbaum (R.), Is There a Place for a Eu

(2010). ropean Delaware in the Corporate

Project
Conflict of Laws?, 74 RabelsZ 1 (2010).
Basedow (J.), Kono (T.) & Metzger (A.)
Intellectual in the Dutta (A.), The Death of the Share
(eds.), Property
Global Arena: holder in the Conflict of Laws, 73
Jurisdiction, Applicable
and the of Judg RabelsZ 727 (2009).
Law, Recognition
ments in Europe, Japan and the US Erk (N.), The Cross-Border Transfer of
(2010). Seat in European Company Law: A De

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
400 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

liberation about the Status Quo and 11. PIL and Culture
the Fate of the Real Seat Doctrine, Basedow (J.), Multiculturalism, Global
2010 Eur. Bus. L. Rev. 413 (2010).
ization and the Law of the Open
Gerner-Beuerle (C.) & Schillig (M.), Society, 62 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l
The Mysteries of Freedom of Establish 715 (2009).
ment after Cartesio, 59 Int'l & Comp. Grammaticaki-Alexiou Multicul
(A.),
L. Q. 303 (2010). turalism: Does it Affect Contemporary
Hartley (T.), Multinational International Transactions?, 62 Rev.
Corpora
tions and the Third World: A Conflict Hellenique Dr. Int'l 553 (2009).
of-Laws Analysis, 62 Rev. Hellenique Kamenova (T.), Different Legal Cultures
Dr. Int'l 657 (2009). and Global Judicialization at the End
of the 20th and the Beginning of the
Jacobs (J.), The Reach of State Corpo
21st Century, 62 Rev. Hellenique Dr.
rate Law Beyond State Borders:
Int'l 617 (2009).
Reflections upon Federalism, 84
Kreuzer (K.), Clash of Civilizations and
N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1149 (2009).
Conflict of Laws, 62 Rev. Hellenique
Kahan (M.) & Rock (E.), How to Prevent
Dr. Int' I 629 (2009).
Hard Cases from
Making Bad Law:
Kronke (H.), From International to
Bear Stearns, Delaware, and the Stra
Transnational Commercial Law: The
tegic Use of Comity, 58 Emory L. J.
Impact of Diversities of Cultures, 62
713 (2009). Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 705 (2009).
Kuipers (J.), Cartesio and Grunkin Paul: Michaels Global
(R.), Legal Pluralism,
Mutual Recognition as a Vested Rights 2009(5) Ann. Rev. L. Soc. Sci. 14.1
Theory Based on Party Autonomy in (2009).
Private Law, 2 Eur. J. Leg. Stud. 66 Rossolillo Personal at a
(G.), Identity
(2009). Crossroads Between Private Interna
Martin (D.) & Pracchia (D.), Company tional Law, International Protection of
Mobility Through Cross-Border Trans Human Rights and EU Law, 11 Ybk
fers of Registered Offices Within the Priv. Int'l L. 143 (2009).
European Union—A New Challenge Van Loon (H.), Legal Diversity in a Flat,
for French Law, 2010 Clunet 327 Crowded World: The Role of the Hague
(2010). Conference, 62 Rev. Hellenique Dr.
Int'l 495 (2009).

10. Cultural Property 12. Maritime Conflicts

A. Books
Bazyler (M.) & Gerber (S.), Litigating
the Pillage of Cultural Property in Von Ziegler (A.), Zunarelli (S.) &
American Courts: Chabad v. Russian Schelin (J.) (eds.), The Rotterdam
Federation and Lessons Learned, 32 Rules 2008: Commentary to the United
Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 45 Nations Convention on Contracts for
(2010). the International Carriage of Goods
Demarsin Wholly or Partly by Sea (2010).
(B.), The Third Time Is Not Al
ways a
Charm: The Troublesome B. Articles
Legacy of a Dutch Art Dealer—The
Basedow (J.), Rome II at Sea—General
Limitation and Act of State Defenses
Aspects of Maritime Torts, 74 RabelsZ
in Looted Art Cases, 28 Cardozo Arts
118 (2010).
& Ent. L.J. 255 (2010).
Berlingieri (F.), Freedom of Contract
Frigo (M.), Ethical Rules and Codes of under the Rotterdam 14 Unif. L.
Rules,
Honor Related to Museum Activities: A Rev. 831 (2009).
Complementary Support to the Private
Fresnedo de Aguirre (C.), The Rotter
International Law Approach Concern
dam Rules from the Perspective of a
ing the Circulation of Cultural
Country that is a Consumer of Ship
Property, 2009 Int'l J. Cult. Prop. 49
ping Services, 14 Unif. L. Rev. 869
(2009). (2009).
Totcharova (P.), The 2003 Unesco Con Gaskell (N.), The Bunker Pollution Con
vention for the Safeguarding of the vention 2001 and Limitations of
Intangible Cultural Heritage, 62 Rev. 2009 J. Int'l Mar. L. 477
Liability,
Hellenique Dr. Int'l 609 (2009). (2009).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 401

Harris (J.), Opting out of Admiralty Cumings-Peterson (D.), Out-of-State

Law? Uniformity vs. Freedom of Con Civil Unions in Iowa after Varnum v.
tract in the Selection of State Choice of Brien: Why the State of Iowa Should
Law, 34 Tul. Mar. L. J. 167 (2009). Recognize Civil Unions as Marriages,
Jones (J.), Forum and Venue Selection 96 Iowa L. Rev. 297 (2010).
Clauses in Seamen's Employment Con Estin (A.), Families Across Borders: The
tracts: Can Contractual Stipulations Children's Conventions and the
Hague
Be Used to Defeat a Seaman's Choice Case for International Law in
Family
of Forum or Venue in a Jones Act the United 62 Fla. L. Rev. 47
States,
Claim?, 85 Tul. L. Rev. 519 (2010). (2010).
Meidanis (H.), Sale and Purchase of Ves
Fessas (A.), Regulation of Same-Sex
sels Before Greek Courts: How Safe is
Marriage, 63 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l
the Choice of Foreign Law Made by the 53 (2010).
Parties?, 61 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l
Fiorini the Law Appli
455 (2008). (A.), Harmonizing
cable to Divorce and Legal Separation:
Morris (R.), Conflicts of Limitation Laws
Enhanced Cooperation as the Way For
in the United States and the United
ward?, 59 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 1143
Kingdom: Solving the Riddle of Nor
walk 34 Tul. Mar. L. J. 303
(2010).
Victory,
(2009). Fotschl (A.), The Common Optional
Ortiz What in Interna Matrimonial Property Regime of Ger
(R.), Changes
tional Law after the many and France—Epoch-Making in
Transport
Rotterdam 14 Unif. L. Rev. 893 the Unification of Law, 11 Ybk Priv.
Rules?,
Int'l L. 395 (2009).
(2009).
Papavizas (C.) & Morrissey (G.), Does Fournier (P.), Flirting with God in West
the Jones Act Apply to Offshore Alter ern Secular Courts: Mahr in the West,
native 34 Tul. Mar. 2010 Int'l J. L. Pol'y & Fam. 67 (2010).
Energy Projects?,
L. J. 377 (2010). Harvey (K), The Rights of Divorced Les
Tan (A.), The EU Ship-Source Pollution bians: Interstate Recognition of Child
Directive and Coastal State Jurisdic Custody Judgments in the Context of
tion over Ships, 2010 Lloyd's Marit. & Same-Sex Divorce, 78 Fordham L. Rev.
Comm. L. Q. 469 (2010). 1379 (2009).
Tebbens (H.), The European Union and Hill (D.), The Hague Convention on the
the Athens Convention on Maritime International Protection of Adults, 58
Carriers' Liability for Passengers in Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 469 (2009).
Case of Accidents: An Incorporation Joslin (C.), Interstate Recognition of
Adventure, 61 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l
Parentage in a Time of Disharmony:
653 (2008). Same-Sex Parent Families and Be
yond, 70 Ohio St. L. J. 563 (2009).
13. Family Law
Kjrby (M.), Children Caught in Conflict
B The Child Abduction Convention in
A. Books
Australia, 2010 Int'l J. L. Pol'y & Fam.
Hague Conference on Private Inter 95 (2010).
national Law, Guide to Good Practice:
Levin (H.), Resolving Interstate Conflicts
Enforcement under the Hague Conven
over Same-Sex Non-Marriage, 63 Fla.
tion of 25 October 1980 on the Civil
L. Rev. 47 (2011).
Aspects of International Child Abduc
tion (2010). Resnicoff (B.), The Importance of Inter
state Jurisdictional Issues in Family
ShXjilleabhAin (M.), Cross-Border Di
Law Matters, 24 Am. J. Fam. L. 78
vorce Law: Brussels II Bis (2010).
(2010).
B. Articles Shah Inconvenient or
(P.), Marriages,
Bogdan International Law What Happens When Ethnic Minori
(M.), Private
of the Introduction of Same ties Marry Trans-Jurisdictionally, 6
Aspects
Sex Marriages in Sweden, 78 Nordic J. Utrecht L. Rev. 17 (2010).
Int'l L. 253 (2009). Tzianoudaki (N.), The 2004 Moroccan
Brown (A.), The Hague Adoption Con Family Code: An Innovation in Pro
vention in Comparison to Chinese and gress Issues of Private International
Russian Adoption Laws, 2009 Int'l L. Law, 57 Ann. Fac. Dr. Istanbul 345
1337 (2009). (2008).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
402 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Walker (L.), The Impact of the Hague Hague Conference on Private Inter
Abduction Convention on the Rights of national Law, Proceedings of the
the Family in the Case-Law of the Eu Twentieth Session; vol. Ill Choice of
ropean Court of Human Rights and the Court (2010).
UN Human Rights Committee: The Hinarejos Parga (A.), Judicial Control
Danger of Neulinger, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. in the European Union: Reforming Ju
649 (2010). risdiction in the Intergovernmental
Wardle (L.), Religious
Marriage and Pillars (2010).
Liberty: Comparative Law Problems Lavranos (N.), Jurisdictional Competi
and Conflict of Laws Solutions, 12 J. L. tion: Selected Cases in International
& Fam. Stud. 315 (2010). and European Law (2010).
Wakdle (L.), Section Three of the De McCaffrey (S.) & Main (T.), Transna
fense of
Marriage Act: Deciding, tional Litigation in Comparative
Democracy, and the Constitution, 58 Perspective: Theory and Application
Drake L. Rev. 951 (2010). (2010).
Raphael (T.), The Anti-Suit Injunction
14. Marital Property (2010).
Surhone (L.), Timpledon (M.) & Mar
Bruce (S.) & Walker (E.), Double Dutch:
seken (S.), United States Court of
The Relevance of Hague Conventions
International Trade: Subject Matter
to Marital Contracts and Maintenance,
Jurisdiction, International Trade,
2010 Fam. Law. 381 (2010).
Trade Adjustment Assistance, United
Jayme (E.), Party Autonomy in Interna
States International Trade Commis
tional Family and Succession Law:
sion (2010).
New Tendencies, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 1
Weintraub (R.), International Litigation
(2009).
and Arbitration: Practice and Planning
Meurling (E.), Less Surprises for
(6th ed. 2011).
Spouses Moving Within the Nordic
Countries? Amendments to the 1931 B. Articles
Nordic Convention on Marriage, 11
Bast (C.), Conflict of Law and Surrepti
Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 385 (2009).
tious Taping of Telephone Conver
Nascimbene (B.), Jurisdiction and Appli
sations, 54 N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 147
cable Law in Matrimonial Matters:
(2009).
Rome III Regulation? 2009 Eur. Leg.
Beaumont (P.), Hague Choice of Court
For. 1 (2009).
Agreements Convention 2005: Back
Sanders (A.), Private Autonomy and
ground, Negotiations, Analysis and
Marital Property Agreements, 59 Int'l
Current Status, 5 J. Priv. Int'l L. 125
& Comp. L. Q. 571 (2010).
(2009).
Bogdan (M.), The New EC Rules on
15. Succession
Summary Proceedings in Civil and
Commercial Matters, 61 Rev. Hel
A. Books
lenique Dr. Int'l 55 (2008).
Garb (L.) & Wood (J.) (eds.), Interna Boutin (G.), Forum non Conveniens and
tional Succession (3r ed. 2010). Lis Alibi Pendens in International Liti
gation in Panama, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L.
B. Articles
497 (2009).
Lein (E.), Further Step Towards a Euro Buxbaum (H.), National Jurisdiction and
pean Code of Private International Global Business 17 Ind. J.
Networks,
Law: The Commission Proposal for a Glob. Leg. Stud. 165 (2010).
Regulation on Succession, 11 Ybk Priv.
Buxbaum (H.), Personal Jurisdiction over
Int'l L. 107 (2009). Directors in Cross-Border Se
Foreign
curities Litigation, 35 Corp. Law 71
16. Jurisdiction and Procedure
(2009).
Carillo (A.) & Palmer (J.), Transna
A. Books
tional Mass Claim Processes (TMCPS)
Danov (M.), Jurisdiction and Judgments in International Law and Practice, 28
in Relation to EU Competition Law Berkeley J. Int'l L. 343 (2010).
Claims (2011). Cheng Scientific Evidence as For
(E.),
Epstein (D.) & Baldwin (C.), Interna eign Law, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 1095
tional Litigation (4th rev. ed. 2010). (2010).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 4 03

Coleman (K), White (R.) & Baudot (A.), Ln (M.), An Empirical Examination of
Current Developments in Cross -Bor the Adequate Alternative Forum in the
der Insolvency Law: The Contours of Doctrine of Forum non Conveniens, 8
Discretionary Relief under Chapter 15 Rich. J. Glob. L. & Bus. 513 (2009).
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, 26 Bank. Main (T.), The Procedural Foundation of
& Fin. L. Rev. 23 (2010). Substantive Law, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev.
Dickinson (A.), Restrained No More? 801 (2010).
Service out of the Jurisdiction in the
Makridou (K.), Cost and Fee Allocation
21st Century, 2010 (1) Lloyd's Marit. &
in Civil Procedure, 63 Rev. Hellenique
Comm. L. Q. 1 (2010).
Dr. Int'l 113 (2010).
Dickinson (A.), Provisional Measures in
Marongiu Buonaiuti (F.), Lis Alibi
the Brussels I Review: Disturbing the
Pendens and Related Actions in Civil
Status Quo?, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 519
and Commercial Matters Within the
(2010).
European Judicial Area, 11 Ybk Priv.
D'Oliveira (H.), The Nonelection Rule
Int'l L. 511 (2009).
and Procedural Treatment of Foreign
Law: Some 61 Rev. Hel Maxeiner (J.), Cost and Fee Allocation in
Observations,
Dr. Int' I 499 (2008). Civil Procedure, 58 Am. J. Comp. L.
lenique
195 (2010 Supp.).
Edsall (C.), Implementing the Hague
Convention on Choice of Court McBeth (I.), Prosecute the Cheerleader,
Agree
ments in the United States: An Save the World?: Asserting Federal Ju
to Clarify and risdiction over Child Pornography
Opportunity Recognition
Enforcement Practice, 120 Yale L. J. Crimes Committed Through "Sexting,"
397 (2010). 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1327 (2010).

Feldman (M.), Putting the Brakes on Li McFarland (R.), Please Do Not Publish
bel Tourism: Examining the Effects this Article in England: A Jurisdic
Test as a Basis for Personal Jurisdic tional Response to Libel Tourism, 79
tion under New York's Libel Terrorism Miss. Law J. 617 (2010).
Protection Act, 31 Cardozo L. Rev. Mevorach Jurisdiction in Insol
(I.),
2457 (2010). vency: A Study of European Courts'
Garnett (R.), The Hague Choice of Court Decisions, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 327 (2010).
Convention: Magnum Opus or Much
Mortensen (R.), The Hague and the
Ado About Nothing?, 5 J. Priv. Int'l L.
Ditch: The Trans-Tasman Judicial
161 (2009). Area and the Choice of Court Conven
Gruber & Bach
(U.) (I.), The Application tion, 5 J. Priv. Int'l L. 213 (2009).
of Foreign Law: A Progress Report on a
Muir Watt (H.), Brussels I and Aggre
New European Project, 11 Ybk Priv.
gate Litigation or the Case for
Int'l L. 157 (2009).
Redesigning the Common Judicial
Hartley (T.), Jurisdiction in Conflict of
Area in Order to Respond to Changing
Laws: Disclosure, Third-Party Debt
Dynamics, Functions and Structures
and Freezing Orders, 126 L. Q. Rev. in Contemporary and Lit
Adjudication
194 (2010). 111 (2010).
igation, 2010(2) IPrax
Heiser (W.), The Hague Convention on
Noren (D.), Tax Havens and Tax Policy:
Choice of Court Agreements: The Im
How Should the U.S. Tax System
pact on Forum non Conveniens,
Treat Income Earned by Multination
Transfer of Venue, Removal, and Rec
als in Low-Tax Jurisdictions?, 88 Taxes
ognition of Judgments in United States
27 (2010).
Courts, 31 U. Pa. Int'l L. 1013 (2010).
Parrish (A.), Comity and Parallel For
Hess (B.), Cross-Border Collective Liti
eign Proceedings: A Reply to Black and
gation and the Regulation Brussels I,
Swan. Underwriters v.
2010(2) IPrax 116 (2010). Lloyd's
Cominco Ltd., 47 Can. Bus. L. J. 209
Jones (K), Federalism and Concurrent
(2009).
Jurisdiction in Global Markets: Why a
Combination of National and State An Parrish (A.), Duplicative Foreign Litiga
titrust Enforcement Is a Model for tion, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 237 (2010).
Effective Economic Regulation, 30 Perreau-Saussine (L.), Forum Con
N.W. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 285 (2010). veniens and Anti-SuitInjunctions
Kruger (T.), Civil Jurisdiction and the before French Courts: Recent Develop
Issue of Legislating, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. ments, 59 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 519
499 (2010). (2010).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
404 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Polkowska (M.), Some Observations on Wagner (V.), The Hague Conference for
Civil Air
Carrier Liability in Interna Private International Law: Ten Years
tional Air Carriage: Accident, Damage of EC Competence in Regards to Judi
and Jurisdiction, 15 Unif. L. Rev. 109 cial Cooperation in Civil Matters, 73
(2010). RabelsZ 215 (2009).

Ritchie (J.), A Tie That Binds: Forum

Selection Clause Enforceability in 17. Tribal Jurisdiction
West Virginia, 113 W. Va. L. Rev. 95
(2010). Eid (T.) & Doyle (C.), Separate but Une
qual: The Federal Criminal Justice
Robertson (C.), Transnational Litiga
System in Indian Country, 81 U. Colo.
tion and Institutional Choice, 51 B.
L. Rev. 1067 (2010).
Coll. L. Rev. 1081 (2010).
Fletcher (M.), Resisting Federal Courts
Ryngaert (C.), Territorial Jurisdiction
on Tribal Jurisdiction, 81 U. Colo. L.
over Cross-Frontier Offences: Revisit
Rev. 973 (2010).
ing a Classic Problem of International
Florey (K.), Indian Country's Borders:
Criminal Law, 9 Int'l Crim. L. Rev. 187
Territoriality, Immunity, and the Con
(2009). 51 B.
struction of Tribal Sovereignty,
Samuels (J.), When Is an Alternative Fo Coll. L. Rev. 595 (2010).
rum Available? Rethinking the Forum
Goldberg (C.), In Theory, in Practice:
non Conveniens Analysis, 85 Ind. L. J.
Judging State Jurisdiction in Indian
1059 (2010). 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1027
Country,
Santomauro (P.), Sense and Sensibility: (2010).
Reviewing West Tankers and Dealing Krakoff Juris
(S.), Tribal Civil Judicial
with its Implications in the Wake of diction over Nonmembers: A Practical
the Reform of EC Regulation 44/2001, Guide for Judges, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev.
6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 281 (2010). 1187 (2010).
Skinner (G.), Customary International Painter-Thorne (S.), If You Build It,
Law, Federal Common Law, and Fed They Will Come:
Preserving Tribal
eral Court Jurisdiction, 44 Valp. U. L. Sovereignty in the Face of Indian Casi
Rev. 825 (2010). nos and the New Premium on Tribal
Spencer (A.), Nationwide Personal Ju Membership, 14 Lewis & Clark L. Rev.
risdiction for Our Federal Courts, 87 311 (2010).
Denv. U. L. Rev. 325 (2010).
Spigelman (J.), The Centrality of Juris 18. Class Actions
dictional Error, 21 Public L. Rev. 77
(2010). Monestier (T.), Personal Jurisdiction
over Non-Resident Class Members:
Steinle (J.) & Vasiliades (E.), The En
Have We Gone down the Wrong Road?,
forcement of Jurisdiction Agreements 45 Tex. Int'l Law J. 537 (2010).
under the Brussels I Regulation: Re
Pigman (H.) & Calhoun (M.), Unsettling
considering the Principle of Party
the Settled: Is There a Re-Emerging
Autonomy, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 565
Debate Regarding the Role of Choice
(2010).
of-Law in Class Certification Proceed
Strong (S.), Jurisdictional Discovery in
ings?, 77 Def. Couns. J. 465 (2010).
United States Federal Courts, 67
Saumier (G.), Competing Class Actions
Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 489 (2010).
Across Canada: Still at the Starting
Trooboff (P.), Proposed Principles for Gate after Canada Post v. Lepine?, 48
United States Implementation of the Can. Bus. L. J. 462 (2010).
New Hague Convention on Choice of Schwing (A.), Comity Versus Unitary
Court Agreements, 42 N.Y. U. J. Int'l L. -
Law: A Clash of Principles in Choice
& Pol'y 237 (2009). of-Law for Class Certification
Analysis
van Lith (H.), International Jurisdiction Proceedings in Multidistrict Litigation,
and Commercial Litigation: Uniform 33 Seattle U. L. Rev. 361 (2010).
Rules for Contract Disputes, 2009 Watkins How States Can Protect
(L.),
Nederl. Int'l Priv. 597 (2009). Their Policies in Federal Class Actions,
Vlas (P.), Ibili (F.), Zilinsky M. & Vlek 32 Campbell L. Rev. 285 (2010).
(J.), Civil Jurisdiction and Enforce York-Erwin (G.), The Choice-of-Law
ment of Judgments in Europe, 56 Neth. Problem(s) in the Class Action Con
Int'l L. Rev. 245 (2009). text, 84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1793 (2009).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 4 05

19. Sovereign Immunity Gobal Economy, 74 RabelsZ 463

(2010).
A. Books
Choi (S.) & Silberman (L.), Transna
Bankas (E.), The State Immunity Contro tional Litigation and Global Securities
versy in International Law: Private Class-Action Lawsuits, 2009 Wis. L.
Suits Against Sovereign States in Do Rev. 465 (2009).
mestic Courts (2010). Cleveland (S.), Embedded International
Barker (J.), Immunities from Jurisdic Law and the Constitution Abroad, 110
tion in International Law (2009). Col. L. Rev. 225 (2010).
Franey (E.), Immunity, Individuals and Colangelo The Foreign Commerce
(A.),
International Law: Which Individuals 96 Va. L. Rev. 949 (2010).
Clause,
are Immune from the Jurisdiction of Doorey (D.), In Defense of Transnational
National Courts under International
Domestic Labor Regulation, 43 Vand.
Law (2011). J. Transn'l L. 953 (2010).
B. Articles Endicott (A.), The Judicial Answer?
Dickinson State and Treatment of the Political Question
(A.), Immunity
Doctrine in Alien Tort Claims, 28
State-Owned Enterprises, 11 Bus. L.
Int'l 97 (2010). Berkeley J. Int'l L. 537 (2010).

Edmonds No More Free Passes: Florey (K.), State Extraterritorial Pow

(A.),
v. Samantar and the Foreign ers Reconsidered: A Reply, 85 Notre
Yousuf
Immunities Dame L. Rev. 1157 (2010).
Sovereign Act, 88 N.C. L.
Rev. 1448 (2010). Georgopoulos (T.), Can Tax Authorities
Portnoy (A.) et al., The Foreign Sover Scrutinise the Ideas of Foreign Chari
eign Immunities Act: 2008 Year in ties? The ECJ's Persche Judgment and
Review, 16 L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 179 Lessons from US Tax Law, 16 Eur. L.
(2010). J. 458 (2010).
Rozakis (C), The Law of State Immunity Hovenkamp (H.), The Federal Trade
Revisited: The Case Law of the Euro Commission and the Sherman Act, 62
pean Court of Human Rights, 61 Rev. Fla. L. Rev. 871 (2010).
Hellenique Dr. Int'l 563 (2008). Jaeger Environmental Claims
(K.),
under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berke
20. Extraterritoriality
ley J. Int'l L. 519 (2010).
Kahn (J.), Zoya's Standing Problem, Or,
A. Books
When Should the Constitution Follow
American Antitrust Institute, The In the 108 Mich. L. Rev. 673
Flag?,
ternational Handbook on Private (2010).
Enforcement of Competition Law
Kirsch (M.), The Role of Physical Pres
(2010). ence in the Taxation of Cross-Border
Engle (E.), The Alien Torts Statute: Ex Personal Services, 51 Z?. Coll. L. Rev.
traterritorial Jurisdiction in U.S. and 993 (2010).
International Law (2010).
Knox (J.), A Presumption Against Ex
Guzman (A.) (ed.), Cooperation, Comity,
trajurisdictionality, 104 Am. J. Int'l
and Competition Policy (2010). Law 351 (2010).
B. Articles Kurtz (J.), Adjudging the Exceptional at
International Investment Law: Secur
Ainscough (C.), Choice
of Law and Ac
Liability under the Alien Tort ity, Public Order and Financial Crisis,
complice
28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 588 59 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 325 (2010).
Statute,
(2010). Lincoln (R.), To Proceed with Caution?
Apostolova The Be Aiding and Abetting Liability under
(E.), Relationship
tween the Alien Tort Statute and the the Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berkeley J.
Torture Victim Protection Act, 28 Int'l L. 604 (2010).
Berkeley J. Int'l L. 640 (2010). Meyer (J.), Dual
Illegality and
Buxbaum (R.) & Caron (D.), The Alien Geoambiuous A New Rule for Ex
Law:
Tort Statute: An Overview of the Cur traterritorial Application of U.S. Law,
rent 28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 511 95 Minn. L. Rev. 110 (2010).
Issues,
(2010). PotestA (M.), State Immunity and Jus
Calliess (G.-P.) & Mertens (J.), Private Cogens Violations: The Alien Tort
Law and Competition Policy in the Statute Against the Backdrop of the

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
406 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Latest Developments in the Law of Na B. Articles

tions, 28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 571 (2010).
Beaumont (P.), Reflections on the Rele
Reuveni (E.), Extraterritoriality as
vance of Public International Law to
Standing: A Standing Theory of the
Private International Law Treaty
Extraterritorial Application of the Se
Making, 340 Recueil des Cours 9
curities Laws, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev.
(2010).
1071 (2010).
De Boer (T.), Living Apart Together: The
Rosen (M.), State Extraterritorial Pow
Relationship Between Public and Pri
ers Reconsidered, 85 Notre Dame L.
vate International Law, 57 Neth. Int'l
Rev. 1133 (2010).
L. Rev. 183 (2010).
Salcido (R.), Law Applicable on the
De Dycker (S.), Private International
Outer Continental Shelf and in the Ex
Law Disputes Before the International
clusive Economic Zone, 58 Am. J.
Court of Justice, 1 J. Int'l Disp. Settl.
Comp. L.407 (2010
Supp.). 475 (2010).
Sanders (A.), New Frontiers in the ATS:
Dubinsky (P.), International Law in the
Conspiracy and Joint Criminal Enter
Legal System of the United States, 58
prise Liability after Sosa, 28 Berkeley
Am. J. Comp. L. 455 (2010 Supp.).
J. Int'l L. 619 (2010).
Fernandez Arroyo (D.), Private Inter
Skinner (G.), When Customary Interna
national Law and Comparative Law: A
tional Law Violations Arise Under the
Relationship Challenged by Interna
Laws of the United States, 36 Brook. J.
tional and Supranational Law, 11 Ybk
Int'l L. 205 (2010).
Priv. Int'l L. 31 (2009).
Thornburg (J.), Balancing Act in Black
Finkelman (P.), When International Law
Robes: Extraterritorial Habeas Corpus Was a Domestic Problem, 44 Valp. U.
Jurisdiction Beyond Boumediene, 48
L. Rev. 779 (2010).
Duq. L. Rev. 85 (2010).
Fleuren (J.), The Application of Public
Valdespino (E.), Shifting Viewpoints: International Law by Dutch Courts, 57
The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improve Neth. Int'l L. Rev. 245 (2010).
ment Act, a Substantive or
Telman (A.), Plural Vision: International
Jurisdictional Approach, 45 Tex. Int'l
Law Seen the Varied Lenses
L. J. 457 (2009). Through
of Domestic Implementation, 44 Valp.
Wang Securities
(J.), Pirates: Why a
U. L. Rev. 759 (2010).
More Expansive Basis for Jurisdiction
over Transnational Securities Fraud
23. Harmonization or Unification
Will Prevent the United States from
Turning into the Barbary Coast, 62
A. Books
Admin. L. Rev. 223 (2010).
Waugh (R.), Exhaustion of Remedies and Boele-Woelki (K.),Unifying and Har
the Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berkeley J. monizing Substantive Law and the
Int'l L. 555 (2010). Role of Conflict of Laws (2010).
Whytock (C.), Domestic Courts and Saarloos (K.), European Private Inter
Global Governance, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 67 national Law on Legal Parentage?:
(2009). Thoughts on a European Instrument
Implementing the Principle of Mutual
21. Foreign Affairs
Recognition in Legal Parentage (2010).
Granne (M.), Two-Dimensional Federal
ism and Foreign Affairs Preemption, B. Articles
44 Valp. U. L. Rev. 863 (2010).
Balz (M.), Japan's Accession to the
Pytynia (C.), Forgive Me, Fa
thers
Founding CISG, 73 RabelsZ 683 (2009).
for I Have Sinned: A
Bazinas (S.), The Uncitral Legislative
Reconciliation of Foreign Affairs Pre
Guide on Secured Transactions -
after Medellin v. 43 Key
emption Texas,
Objectives and Fundamental Policies,
Vand. J. Transn'l L. 1413 (2010).
42 U.C.C. L. J. 123 (2010).
Bonell (J.) & Peleggi (R.), UNIDROIT
22. PIL and International Law
Principles of International Commercial
Contracts and Draft Common Frame of
A. Books
Reference: A Synoptical Table, 14 Unif.
Paust (J.), Van Dyke (J.) & Malone (L.), L. Rev. 437 (2009).
International Law and Litigation in Chi (M.), Application of the UNIDROIT
the United States (3d ed. 2009). Principles in China: Short
Successes,

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 4 07

comings and Implications, 15 Unif. L. European Union, 19 Minn. J. Int'l L.

Rev. 5 (2010). 55 (2010).
Clift (J.), International Insolvency Law: Beownstein (B.), Recognizing Civil
The Uncitral Experience with RICO in Foreign Courts: Since They
Harmonisation and Modernisation Came, Should We Build It?, 35 Brook.
Techniques, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 405 J. Int'l L. 233 (2010).
(2009). Danov (M.), The Brussels I Regula
Hofmann (N.), Interpretation Rules and tion: Cross-Border Collective Redress
Good Faith as Obstacles to the UK's Proceedings and Judgments, 6 J. Priv.
Ratification of the CISG and to the Int'l L. 359 (2010).
Harmonization of Contract Law in Eu Dhooge (L.) & Aguinda (V.),
rope, 22 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 145 (2010). ChevronTexaco: Mandatory Grounds
Kobayashi (B.) & Ribstein (L.), The for the Non-Recognition of Foreign
Non-Uniformity of Uniform Laws, 35 Judgments for Environmental Injury
J. Corp. L. 327 (2010). in the United States, 19 J. Transn'l L.

Kotrusz of the CISG & Pol'y 1 (2009).

(J.), Gap-Filling by
the UNIDROIT Principles of Interna George (J.), Enforcing Judgments
tional Commercial Contracts, 2009 Across State and National Boundaries:
Rev. Dr. 119 (2009). Inbound Foreign Judgments and Out
Unif.
bound Texas Judgments, 50 S. Tex. L.
Michaels (R.), Rethinking the UNI
DROIT From a Law to Be
Rev. 399 (2009).
Principles:
Chosen Towards a Gen Gordon Vacatur
(R.), of Foreign Judg
by the Parties
eral Part of Transnational Contract ments: Options for Collateral Relief in
73 RabelsZ 866 (2009). Courts of Registration, 15 Suffolk J.
Law,
Trial & App. Adv. 131 (2010).
Musin (V.), The Influence of the Interna
tional Sale of Goods Convention on Hartley (T.), Cyprus Land Rights: Con
Domestic Law Conflict of flict of Laws Meets International
Including
Laws Reference to Rus Politics, 58 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 1013
(With Specific
sian Law), 342 Recueil des Cours 9 (2009).
(2010). Hay (P.), Recognition of a Recognition
Spagnolo Green and Ham: Judgment Within the European Union,
(L.), Eggs
The CISG, Path Dependence, and the 2009 Eu. Leg. For. 61 (2009).
Behavioural Economics of Lawyers' Huang (J.), Interregional Recognition
Choices of Law in International Sales and Enforcement of Civil and Commer
Contracts, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 417 (2010). cial Judgments: Lessons for China

Veneziano UNIDROIT from US and EU Laws, 6 J. Priv. Int'l

(A.), Principles
and CISG: Change of Circumstances L. 109 (2010).
and Duty to Renegotiate According to Kurzynsky-Singer (E.), Recognition of
the Belgian Supreme Court, 15 Unif. Foreign Judgments by Russian Courts,
L. Rev. 137 (2010). 74 RabelsZ 493 (2010).

Kessedjian (C.), Uniformity v. Diversity Landova (M.), Public Policy Exception to

in Law in a Global World: The Exam Recognition and Enforcement of Judg
of Commercial and Procedural ments in Cases of Copyright
ple
Law, 61 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 319 Infringement, 40 Int'l Rev. Intell. Prop.
(2008). & Compet. L. 642 (2009).
Mangan (J.), The Need for Cross-Border
Clarity: Recognizing American Class
24. Foreign Judgments
Action Judgments in Canada, 35 Adv.
Beaumont (P.) & Johnston (E.), Can Ex Q. 375 (2009).
equatur Be Abolished in Brussels I Meidanis (H.), The Brussels I Regulation
Whilst Retaining a Public Policy De and the Cyprus Problem Before the
fence?, 6 J. Priv. Int'l L. 249 (2010). Court of Justice: Comment on Apos
&
Johnston Aboli tolides v. Orams, 34 Eur. L. Rev. 963
Beaumont (P.) (E.),
tion of the Exequatur in Brussels I: Is a (2009).
Public Policy Defence Necessary for Michaels (R.), Recognition and Enforce
the Protection of Human Rights? ment of Foreign Judgments, Max
2010(2) IPrax 105 (2010). Planck Encycl. Publ. Int'l L. (2009).

Berch (J.), The Need for Enforcement of Moedritzer (M.), Whittaker (K.) & Ye
U.S. Punitive Awards by the (A.), Judgments 'Made in China' but
Damages

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
408 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

Enforceable in the United States? 45 Analysis Related to the Possible Con

Int'l Law. 817 (2010). flict of Law Between the New York
Nelson (T.), Down in Flames: Three U.S. Convention and the Mexican Legal Sys
Courts DeclineRecognition to Judg tem (2009).
ments from Mexico, Citing Corruption, Heard (H.),Walker (S.) & Cooley (J.),
44 Int'l Lawyer 897 (2010). International Commercial Arbitration
P£rez-Correa (F.), Enforcement and Advocacy: A Practitioner's Guide for
Recognition of Foreign Judgments and American Lawyers (2010).
Arbitral Awards in Mexico, 77 Def. Kronke Nacimiento
(H.), (P.), Otto (D.)
Couns. J. 384 (2010). & Port (N.), Recognition and Enforce
Rendleman (D.), Collecting a Libel Tour ment of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A
ist's Defamation Judgment?, 67 Wash. Global Commentary on the New York
& Lee L. Rev. 467 (2010). Convention (2010).
Robinson (T.) & Bradrick (E.), Judg McIlwrath (M.) & Savage (J.), Interna
ment Enforcement in the United tional Arbitration and Mediation: A
States Against Sovereign States: Some Practical Guide (2010).
Interesting Procedural Questions, 4 McMahon (B.) & Smith (F.C.), The Per
Disp. Resol. Int'l 151 (2010). manent Court of Arbitration:
Rotem (Y.), The of Selective
Problem or Summaries of Awards 1999-2009
SporadicRecognition: A New Economic (2010).
Rationalefor the Law of Foreign Coun Mistelis (L.), Concise International Arbi
try Judgments, 10 Chi. J. Int'l L. 505 tration (2010).
(2010). Muller (C.), Swiss Case Law in Interna
Scherpe (J.) & Dutta (A.), Cross-Border tional Arbitration (2d ed. 2010).
Enforcement of English Ancillary Re Noussia (K), Confidentiality in Interna
lief Orders, Fog in the Channel B tional Commercial Arbitration: A
Europe Cut Off?, 2010 Fam. L. 385 Comparative Analysis of the Position
(2010). under English, US, German and
Schlosser (P.), The Abolition of Exe French Law (2010).
quatur Proceedings—Including Public Weigand (F.-B.) (ed.), Practitioner's
Policy Review?, 2010(2) IPrax 101 Handbook on International Commer
(2010). cial Arbitration (2d ed. 2009).
Sinclair (A.) & Stranger-Jones (D.),
Execution of Judgments or Awards B. Articles
Against the Assets of State Entities, 4
Disp. Resol. Int'l 95 (2010). Alvarez Rubio (J.), Contracts for the In
Tay (C.), Enforcement of Arbitral Awards ternational Carriage of Goods:
in the People's Republic of China, 26 Jurisdiction and Arbitration under the
Int'l Const. L. Rev. 207 (2009). New Uncitral Convention 2008, 11
Weinstein (D.), New York: The Next Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 171 (2009).
Mecca for Judgment Creditors? An Bantekas (I.), The Proper Law of the Ar
Analysis of Koehler v. Bank of Ber bitration Clause: A Challenge to the
muda Ltd., 79 Fordham L. Rev. 3161 Prevailing Orthodoxy, 27 J. Int'l
(2010). Arbitr. 1 (2010).
Zamzam (A.-M.), Bankruptcy Jurisdiction Bashayreh (M.), Lex Mercatoria and Ar
and Enforcement of Foreign Bank bitration Agreements: Perspectives
ruptcy Judgments in Egypt, 6 J. Priv. from Greek and Jordanian Law, 62
Int'l L. 623 (2010). Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l 157 (2009).
Beale (N.) & Nieuvweld (L.), Summary
25. Arbitration Arbitration A Compari
Proceedings:
son Between the English and Dutch
A. Books
Regimes, 26 Arb. Int'l 139 (2010).
Binder (P.), International Commercial Bell Resolution and Appli
(A.), Dispute
Arbitration and Conciliation in Unci cable Law Clauses in International
tral Model Law Jurisdiction (2009). 84 Austl. L. J. 116
Sports Arbitration,
Cook (T.) & Garcia (A.), International (2010).
Intellectual Property Arbitration Berger (K.), The International Arbitra
(2010). tor's Dilemma: Transnational Pro
Guajardo (M.), The Amparo, an Impedi cedure Versus Home Jurisdiction, 25
ment to Enforce an Arbitral Award: An Arbitr. Int'l 217 (2009).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
2011] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY 2009-10 4 09

Boddicker (J.), Whose Dictionary Con ternational Commercial Arbitration,

trols? Recent Challenges to the Term 26 Arb. Int'l 191 (2010).
'Investment' in ICSID Arbitration, 25 Mattheqs (J.) & Stewart (K.), Time to
Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 1031 (2010). Evaluate the Standards for Issuance of
Bruce (T.), A Choice of Public Law? Interim Measures of Protection in In
Resolving the International Arbitra ternational Investment Arbitration,
tor's Dilemma, 20 Am. Rev. Int'l Arbitr. 2009 Arb. In? I 529 (2009).
97 (2009). Mohtashami (R.) & Tannous (S.), Arbi
Caron (D.) & Harhay (L.), A Call to Ac tration at the Dubai International
tion: the
Turning State into a
Golden Financial Centre: A Common Law Ju
Golden for International risdiction in the Middle East, 25
Opportunity
Arbitration, 28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 497 Arbitr. Int'l 173 (2009).
(2010). Najar (J.), Out: A User's
Inside Perspec
the tive on in International
Cuniberti (G.), The Law Governing Challenges
of Arbitral Awards, 25 Arbitr. Arbitration, 2009 Arb. Int'l 515 (2009).
Modality
Int'l 347 (2009). Onyema (E.), Enforcement of Arbitral
as a Awards in Sub-Sahara Africa, 26 Arb.
Darbee (R.), Personal Jurisdiction
Defense to the Enforcement of Foreign Int'l 115 (2010).
Arbitral Awards, 41 McGeorge L. Rev. Petsche (M.), International Commercial
345 (2010). Arbitration and the Transformation of

Fei Public as a Bar to En the Conflict of Laws Theory, 18 J. Int'l

(L.), Policy
forcement of International Arbitral L. 453 (2010).
Awards: A Review of the Chinese Ap Radicati di Brozolo (L.), Choice of
26 Arb. Int'l 301 (2010). Court and Arbitration Agreements and
proach,
to Re the Review of the Brussels I Regula
Fisher (G.), Anti-Suit Injunctions
in Breach tion, 2010(2) IPrax 121 (2010).
strain Foreign Proceedings
of an Arbitration Agreement, 22 Bond Rainer (D.), The Impact of West Tankers
L. Rev. 1 (2010). on Parties' Choice of a Seat of Arbitra

Fortunet of Intellec tion, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 431 (2010).

(E.), Arbitrability
tual Disputes in France, 26 Rautray (D.), India's Supreme Court
Property
Arb. Int'l 281 (2010). Places New Hurdles on Enforcement of
Foreign Awards: Venture Global and
Kantaria (S.), The Challenges of Enforc
an Arbitral Award Against a the Cases Leading up to It, 64 Disp.
ing
State in the United 27 Resol. J. 80 (2009).
Foreign States,
J. Int'l Arbitr. 75 (2010). Schill (S.), Most-Favored-Nation Clauses
as a Basis of Jurisdiction in Invest
Karton (J.), Contract Law inInterna
The ment Treaty Arbitration, 10 J. World
tional Commercial Arbitration:
58 Invest. & Trade 189 (2009).
Caseof Suspension of Performance,
& Comp.
Int'l L. Q. 863 (2009). Schwarz (D.), A Regression from the
New York Convention: Questions
Karton (J.), Party Autonomy and Choice
Raised by Thomas v. Carnival Corpo
of Law: Is International Arbitration
ration, 64 U. Miami L. Rev. 1441
Leading the Way or Marching to the
Beat of its Own Drummer?, 60 U. N. (2010).
Br. L. J. 32 (2010). SteinbrOck (B.), Jurisdiction to Set
Aside Foreign Arbitral Awards in In
Kleinheisterkamp (J.), Internationally
dia: Some Remarks on an Erroneous
Mandatory and
Rules Arbitration: A
Rule of Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 481
Practical Attempt, 73 RabelsZ 818
(2009). (2009).
Stipanowich (T.), Arbitration and
Luo (G.), Crime of Law-Bending Arbitra
Choice: Taking Charge of the New
tion in Chinese Criminal Law and its
Litigation, 7 DePaul Bus. & Comm. L.
Effects on International Commercial
11 Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 283
J. 383 (2009).
Arbitration,
Stipanowich (T.), Arbitration: The New
(2009).
Ly Friedman (M.) & Radicati di Litigation, 2010 U. III. L. Rev. 1 (2010).
(F.),
to the ILA Sturley (M.), Jurisdiction and Arbitra
Brozolo (L.), Introduction
tion under the Rotterdam Rules, 14
International Commercial Arbitration
Committee's Report and Recommen Unif. L. Rev. 945 (2009).
dations on the Con Tumbridge (J.), Can an Arbitration
Ascertaining
tents of the Law in In Clause Survive Encroachment from
Applicable

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
410 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW [Vol. 59

European Law?, 21 Int'l Comp. & Vedasto (A.), Laws Applicable and Inter
Comm. L. Rev. 296 (2010). nal Conflict of Laws in Tanzania
Tumbridge (J.), European Anti-Suit In (2009).
junctions in Favour of Arbitration: A Wulfrum & Matz in
(R.) (N.), Conflicts
Sea Change?, 21 Int'l Comp. & Comm. International Environmental Law
L. Rev. 177 (2010).
(2010).
Van den Berg (A.), Enforcement of Arbi
tral Awards Annulled in Russia,, 27 J. B. Articles
Int'l Arbitr. 179 (2010).
Wasco (M.), When Less Is More: The In Dempsey (P.) & Johansson (S.), Mon
ternational Split over Expanded treal v. Brussels: The Conflict of Laws
Judicial Review in Arbitration, 62 on the Issue of Delay in International
Rutgers L. Rev. 599 (2010). Air Carriage, 35 Air & Space L. 207
Webster (T.), Efficiency in Investment (2010).
Arbitration, 2009 Arb. Int'l 468 (2009). Hoffmeister (F.) & Ondrusek (P.), The
Xiao (F.), Law Applicable to Arbitration in International
European Community
Clauses in China: Comments on the 61 Rev. Hellenique Dr. Int'l
Litigation,
Chinese People's Supreme Court's De 205 (2008).
cision in the Hengji Company Case, 11
Joerges (C.), Sozialstaatlichkeit in Eu
Ybk Priv. Int'l L. 297 (2009).
Xiao & Long rope? A Conflict of Laws Approach to
(Y.) (W.), Enforcement of
the Law of the EU and the Procedural
International Arbitration Agreements
isation of Constitutionali-sation, 10
in Chinese Courts, 2009 Arb. Int'l 569
Germ. L. J. 335 (2009).
(2009).
Zhu Law to Arbitration Kleiner (C.), Money in Private Interna
(W.), Applicable
in China, 11 Ybk Priv. tional Law: What Are the Problems?
Agreements
Int'l L. 255 (2009). What Are the Solutions?, 11 Ybk Priv.
Int'l L. 565 (2009).
26. Miscellaneous Krishnamurthi The Choice of Rules
(G.),
Clause: A Solution to the Choice of
A. Books
Law Problem in Ethics Proceedings, 88
Black (V.), Foreign Currency Claims in Tex. L. Rev. 855 (2010).
the Conflict of Laws (2010).
Leibner (J.), An Executory Approach to
Reitz (J.) & Symeonides (S.) (eds.), Wel
Cross-Border Insolvencies, 64 U.
coming the World: U.S. National
Miami L. Rev. 1171 (2010).
Reports to the XVIIIth International
Congress of Comparative Law (2010). Rothrock (A.), Temporal and Substan
Sarat Douglas & Umphrey tive Choice of Law under the Colorado
(A.), (L.)
(M.) Law and the Rules of Professional Conduct, 39 Colo.
(eds.), Stranger
(2010). Law. 35 (2010).

Van Lith (H.), The Dutch Collective Set Weiss (J.), Tax Claims in Transnational
tlements Act and Private International Insolvencies: A 'Revenue Rule-Ap
Law (2010). proach,' 30 Va. Tax Rev. 261 (2010).

This content downloaded from 139.80.123.50 on Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:46:18 UTC
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions