Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Geometric Design of Railways Tracks
Geometric Design of Railways Tracks
Introduction
The train speed and the maximum load which a train can carry influences the safety and
operations of trains. To ensure the safe and smooth running of trains at maximum permissible
speeds and carrying the heaviest axle loads, a proper track geometry should be put in place.
Geometric design of railway tracks includes all those parameters which determine or influence
the geometry of the railway track. Geometric parameters considered include:
1. Track gradients
2. Track curvature (horizontal and vertical curves)
3. Track alignment
Why are we so concerned about geometric design?? –A proper geometric design ensures a safe
and smooth running of trains at maximum permissible speeds carrying the heaviest possible
axle load.
I. Gradients
Gradient is defined as the amount of slope in the longitudinal direction of the railway track.
Gradients are provided to negotiate rise or fall in the level of the railway track. A rising
gradient is one in which the track rises in the direction of movement of traffic and a
downward or falling gradient is one in which the track loses elevation in the direction of
traffic movement.
Gradients are represented by the horizontal distance travelled for a unity rise or fall in
elevation or as a percent rise or fall. Examples of the presentation are 1in n (e.g 1in 400),
1:n (e.g 1:400), or as 0.25%.
Gradients determines the maximum load that can be hauled by a locomotive on that section.
Necessity of Providing Gradients
To reach various stations at different elevations.
To follow the natural contours of the ground.
To reduce the cost of earthworks.
c) Momentum gradient
In this case, the gradient is steeper than the ruling gradient but can be overcome by a train due
to the momentum gathered while running on the section. For instance, a train coming down a
falling gradient acquires enough speed and momentum which gives additional kinetic energy
to the train hence allowing it to negotiate gradients steeper than the ruling gradient. Sections
with momentum gradients should not have obstacles e.g signal which may bring the train to a
critical juncture.
=1750/R
R is the radius of curve (m)
Example
What is the radius of a 2o curve??
ANS: 875m
O- Point of intersection
T1T2- Chord
NB: Versine- Is the perpendicular distance of the midpoint of a chord from the arc of the
circular curve.
Formulae
2𝜋𝑅 𝜋𝑅∅
Length of the curve = 𝑥∅=
360 180
Example
Find the steepest gradients on a 2o curve for a BG line with a ruling gradients of 1:200
Proposed solution
Ruling gradient = 1:200 = 0.5%
Compensation for a 2o curve = 0.04 x 2 = 0.08%
Compensation gradient = 0.5 - 0.08 = 0.42%
=1:238
Therefore the steepest gradient on the curved track is 1:238
Widening of gauge on horizontal curves
A train on a straight track assumes the central position with the flanges of the wheels being
clear of the rails. However, the situation changes on a curved track. As soon as the vehicle
moves onto a curve, the flange of the outside wheel of the leading axle continues to travel in a
straight line till it rubs against the rail. Due to the coning of wheels, the outside wheel travels
a longer distance compared to the inner wheel. This, however, becomes impossible for the
vehicle as a whole since the rigidity of the wheel base causes the trailing axle to occupy a
different position. In an effort to make up for the difference in the distance travelled by the
outer wheel and the inner wheel, the inside wheels slip backward and the outer wheels skid
forward. Due to impounding action of the wheels on curves, the gauge of the track gets widened
and the rails get tilted outward. To prevent the tendency of tilting the rail outward, the gauge
of the track on curves is suitably widened. The amount of widening of gauge depends on the
radius of the curve, gauge and rigid wheel base of the vehicles.
13 (𝐵+𝐿)2
Extra width on curves (w) =
𝑅
NB: The extra width of the gauge should not exceed 25mm for B.G. tracks and 16mm for
M.G. tracks.
Superelevation
When a train negotiates a curve, it is subjected to a constant radial acceleration which produces
centrifugal force acting horizontally at the centre of gravity of the vehicle and radially away
from the centre of the curve. In order to counteract this force and thus provide a comfortable
ride, the outer rail of the track is raised slightly higher than the inner rail. The difference in
elevation between the outer rail and inner rail is called superelevation or cant. Superelevation
(cant) is the difference in height between outer and inner rail on a curve. It is provided by
gradually lifting the outer rail above the level of the inner rail. The inner rail is usually taken
as the reference rail and is normally maintained in its original level.
Necessity of superelevation
To ensure a better distribution of load on both rails.
To reduce the wear and tear of the rails and rolling stock
To neutralise the effect of lateral forces
To provide comfort to passengers.
Equilibrium Speed
When the speed of the train negotiating a curved trade is such that the resultant force of the
weight of the vehicle and of radial acceleration is perpendicular to the plane of rails, the vehicle
is not subjected to any unbalanced radial acceleration hence is said to be in equilibrium. This
speed as known as equilibrium speed. At equilibrium speed, the effect of the centrifugal force
is completely balanced by the cant provided.
Maximum Permissible Speed
This is the highest speed permitted to a train on a curve taking into consideration the radius of
curvature, actual cant, cant deficiency, cant excess, and the length of transition. On curves
where the maximum permissible speed is less than the maximum sectional speed of the section
of the line, permanent speed restriction becomes necessary.
𝑣2
𝑎=
𝑅
This radial acceleration produces a centripetal force, F, which acts in a radial direction away
from the centre:
F = mass x acceleration
𝑣2
=mx
𝑅
𝑊 𝑣2
= 𝑥
𝑔 𝑅
F - Centrifugal force
W- Weight of train
To counteract the effect of the centrifugal force, the outer rail on the curve is elevated with
respect to the inner rail (superelevation). Equilibrium is reached when both wheels exert an
equal pressure on the rails. In this state of equilibrium, the difference in the heights of the
outer and inner rails of the curve is known as equilibrium superelevation.
If θ is the angle that the inclined plane makes with the horizontal,
𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒
tan θ = =
𝐺𝑎𝑢𝑔𝑒 𝐺
𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝐹
Also, tan θ = =
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑊
𝑒 𝐹
Thus, =
𝐺 𝑊
𝐺 𝑊 𝑣2
e=Fx but F = 𝑥
𝑊 𝑔 𝑅
𝑊 𝑣2 𝐺
= 𝑥 𝑥
𝑔 𝑅 𝑊
𝐺𝑣 2
=
𝑔𝑅
e –equilibrium superelevation
G - Gauge
v- velocity
𝐺𝑣 2
Also, e =127𝑅
v – speed (km/h)
R – Radius of curve (m)
Example
Determine the super elevation for a 1o curve for an equilibrium speed of 75km/hr
(2.) The equilibrium superelevation, e, is reduced by the permissible cant deficiency Cd and
the resultant super elevation to be provided is:
x = e-Cd
x- superelevation, e- equilibrium superelevation
Cd- cant deficiency (75mm for BG and 50mm for MG)
NB: The value for Cd is generally higher than that of e and therefore x is normally
negative. The branch line thus has a negative superelevation of x.
(3.) The maximum permissible speed on the mainline, which have a superelevation of x is
then calculated by adding the allowable cant deficiency (x + Cd). The safe speed is also
calculated and the smaller of the two values is taken as the maximum permissible speed
on the mainline curve.
(1.) For BG
V = 0.27√(𝐶𝑎 + 𝐶𝑑 ) 𝑋 𝑅
𝐺𝑣 2
NB. This equation has been derived from e=127𝑅, assuming G = 1750mm for 52kg rails
(2.) For MG
V=0.347√(𝐶𝑎 + 𝐶𝑑 )𝑅
NB. Assumption that centre to centre distance between rail heads of MG track is 1058mm.
(2.) For NG
V=3.65√𝑅 − 6
(Subject to a maximum of 50km/hr)
Where V- maximum speed (km/hr)
Ca- actual cant (mm) equilibrium super elevation
Cd- permitted cant deficiency (mm)
R- Radius in (m)
NB. These speeds on curves can be practically changed by relevant authorities after
consideration of certain factors like the condition of the track the standard of
interlocking, the type of locomotive and rolling stock used.
b. Transition Curves
As soon as a train commences motion on a circular track from a straight line track, it is
subjected to a sudden centrifugal force, which not only causes discomfort to the
passengers but also distorts the track alignment and affects the stability of the rolling
stock. In order to smoothen the shift from the straight to the curve, transaction curves
are provided on other side of the circular curve so that the centrifugal force is built up
gradually as the super elevation slowly runs out at a uniform rate. This thus provides a
comfort ride.
Transition curves are provided to decrease smoothly the radius of curvature from
infinity (on a straight alignment) to a specified radius on a circular curve to allow a
smooth negotiation of the curve, to provide a gradual increase in superelevation and to
gradually increase or decrease centrifugal forces induced on the curve.
𝐶𝑑 𝑥 𝑉𝑚
L=0.008Cd x Vm = 125
L=0.72Ca
L- length of the transition curve (m)
Cd- cant deficiency (mm)
Ca- actual cant or superelevation (mm)
Vm - maximum permissible speed (km/hr)
It is generally preferred to give as long a transition as possible because this will give a margin
for some increase of speed at a later date. For designing layout on curve on high speed routes,
future high speeds may therefore be considered for determining the transition length.
III. Vertical Curves
Whenever, there is a change in the gradient of the track, an angle is formed at the junction of
the gradients. This vertical kink at the junction is smoothened by the use of curve, so that bad
lurching is not experienced. The effects of change of gradient cause variation in the draw bar
pull of the locomotive. Whenever there is a change in gradient along a railway track, a vertical
curve should be provided. A change in gradient may cause a bunching of vehicles in the sags
and a variation in the tension of couplings in the summits resulting in the train parting and an
uncomfortable ride. To avoid these ill effects, the change in gradient is smoothened by
providing a vertical curve. A rising gradient is normally considered positive and a falling
gradient is considered negative.
a. Summit Curves
When a train climbs a certain upgrade at a uniform speed and passes over the summit of the
curve, an acceleration begins to act upon it and makes the trains to move faster and increases
the draw bar pull behind each vehicle, causing a variation in the tension in the couplings.
b. Sag Curves
When a train passes over a sag, the front of the train ascends an up-grade while rear vehicles
tend to compress the couplings and buffers, and when the whole train has passed the sag, the
couplings are again in tension causing a jerk. Due to above reasons, it is essential to introduce
a vertical curve at each sag and at each summit or apex.
L=RQ
L-length of the vertical curve
R-Radius of the vertical curve
Q-Difference in the percentage of gradients (expressed in radians)
TRACK RESISTANCE
Introduction
Various forces offer resistance to the movement of a train on the track. These resistances may
be the result of movement of the various parts of the locomotives as well as the friction between
them, the irregularities in the track profile, or the atmospheric resistance to a train moving at
great speed. The tractive effort of a locomotive should be sufficient to overcome these
resistances so that the desired speed can be maintained. With this in mind, the tractive power
of a locomotive should be adequate enough to overcome these resistances in order to haul the
train at a specified speed.
TRACTIVE EFFORT
Tractive effort of a locomotive is the force that the locomotive can generate for hauling the
load. The tractive effort of a locomotive should be enough for it to haul a train at the maximum
permissible speed. Tractive effort is generally equal to or a little greater than the hauling
capacity of the locomotive. If the tractive effort is much greater than what is required to haul
the train, the wheels of the locomotive may slip. A rough assessment of the tractive effort of
different types of locomotive are provided in the following sections.
Steam Locomotive
The tractive effort of a steam locomotive can be calculated by equating the total power
generated by the steam engine to the work done by the driving wheels. Assume P to be the
difference in steam pressure between the two sides of the cylinder, A the area of the piston of
the engine, d the diameter of the piston of the engine, L the length of the stroke of the engine,
D the diameter of the wheel of locomotive, and Te the mean tractive effort of the locomotive.
Work done by two-cylinder steam engine = 2 X difference in steam pressure X area of the
piston X 2 X length of the stroke
= 2P x A x 2L
= 2P x (πd2/4) x 2L
= πPd2L
Work done in one revolution of the driving wheel of the locomotive:
= tractive effort x circumference of the wheel
= Te X πD
Thus πPd2L = Te X π D
Te = Pd2L/D
Thus it is clear from above Equation that tractive effort increases with an increase in steam
pressure difference and the diameter and length of the piston, but decreases with an increase in
the diameter of the driving wheel of the locomotive.
Diesel Locomotive
Tractive effort of a diesel-elective locomotive can be assessed by the following empirical
formula.
(308 𝑥 𝑅𝐻𝑃)
𝑇𝑒 =
𝑉
where Te is the tractive effort of a diesel-electric locomotive (kg), RHP is the rated horsepower
of the engine, and V is the velocity in km/hr.
Electric Locomotive
Tractive effort of an electric locomotive varies inversely with the power of speed. The
empirical formulae for calculating the approximate value of tractive effort are as follows:
For a dc electric locomotive: Te = a / V3
For an ac electric locomotive: Te = a / V5
where a is a constant depending upon the various characteristics of the locomotive. .
HAULING POWER OF A LOCOMOTIVE
Hauling power of a locomotive depends upon the weight exerted on the driving wheels and the
friction between the driving wheel and the rail. The coefficient of friction depends upon the
speed of the locomotive and the condition of the rail surface. The higher the speed of the
locomotive, the lower will be the coefficient of friction, which is about 0.1 for high speeds and
0.2 for low speeds. The condition of the rail surface, whether wet or dry, smooth or rough, etc.,
also plays an important role in deciding the value of the coefficient of function. If the surface
is very smooth, the coefficient of friction will be very low.
Hauling power = number of pairs of driving wheels X weight exerted on each driving axle X
coefficient of friction
Thus, for a locomotive with three pairs of driving wheels, an axle load of 20 tonnes, and a
coefficient of friction equal to 0.2, the hauling power will be equal to 3 x 20 x 0.2 tonne, i.e.,
12 tonnes.
Example: Calculate the maximum permissible load that a BG locomotive with three pairs of
driving wheels bearing an axle load of 22 tonnes each can pull on a straight level track at a
speed of 80 km/h. Also calculate the reduction in speed if the train has to run on a rising gradient
of 1 in 200. What would be the further reduction in speed if the train has to negotiate a 4° curve
on the rising gradient? Assume the coefficient of friction to be 0.2.
ANS = 32.1mm
6. Calculate the length of a vertical curve with a 4000m radius with a rising gradient of 1
in 100 meeting a falling gradient of 1 in 200.
ANS = 60m
7. Calculate the maximum permissible train load that can be pulled by a locomotive with
four pairs of driving wheels with an axle load of 28.42 t each on a BG track with a
ruling gradient of 1 in 200 and a maximum curvature of 3°, travelling at a speed of 48.3
km/h. Take the coefficient of friction to be 0.2.
8. A BG locomotive has three pairs of driving wheels with an axle load of 20 tonnes. If
this locomotive runs at a speed of 120 km/hr, what is the train weight in tonnes that the
locomotive can pull on a straight level track? What is the train weight that the same
locomotive will be able to haul on a 2° curve and a 1in100 gradient?