The document discusses two court cases related to tax exemptions for educational institutions. In the first case, Abra Valley College challenged notices of seizure and sale of its property for unpaid taxes. The court ruled the property was not exempt from taxes because part of it was leased for non-educational purposes. In the second case, De La Salle University protested a tax assessment, arguing it was exempt as a non-profit educational institution. The court agreed and found DSLU was exempt from taxes under the Constitution.
The document discusses two court cases related to tax exemptions for educational institutions. In the first case, Abra Valley College challenged notices of seizure and sale of its property for unpaid taxes. The court ruled the property was not exempt from taxes because part of it was leased for non-educational purposes. In the second case, De La Salle University protested a tax assessment, arguing it was exempt as a non-profit educational institution. The court agreed and found DSLU was exempt from taxes under the Constitution.
The document discusses two court cases related to tax exemptions for educational institutions. In the first case, Abra Valley College challenged notices of seizure and sale of its property for unpaid taxes. The court ruled the property was not exempt from taxes because part of it was leased for non-educational purposes. In the second case, De La Salle University protested a tax assessment, arguing it was exempt as a non-profit educational institution. The court agreed and found DSLU was exempt from taxes under the Constitution.
In the case of Abra Valley College vs Aquino (G.R. No.
L-39086), the petitioner, an educational
corporation and institution of higher learning duly incorporated ;with the Securities and Exchange Comission in 1948, filed a complaint to annual and declare void the “Notice of Seizure” and the “Notice of Sale” of its lot and building located at Bangued, Abra, for non-payment of real estate ,taxes and penalties amounting to P5,140.31. Said “Motice of Seizure” by respondents Municipal Treasure and Provincial Treasurer, defendants below, was issued for the satisfaction of the said taxes thereon. The court ruled in this case that Section 22, paragraph 3, Artivle VI of then 1935 Philippine Constitution, expressly grants exemption from realty taxes for cemeteries, churches and parsonages or convents appurtenant thereto, and all lands, buildings and improvements used exclusively for religious, charitable or educational purposes. However, the lease of the first floor thereof to the Northern Marketing Corporation cannot by any stretch of the imagination be considered incidental to the purpose of education. The test of exemption from taxation is the use of the property for purposes mentioned in the Constitution. On the other hand, the case of CIR vs DSLU G.R. 196596 Nov. 9 2016, In 2004, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued a letter authorizing it’s revenue officers to examine the book of accounts of and records for the year 2003 De La Salle University (DLSU) and later on issued a demand letter to demand payment of tax deficiencies. DLSU protested the assessment arguing that as a non-stock, non- profit educational institution, it is exempt from paying taxes according to Article XIV, Section 4 (3) of the Constitution (All revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt from taxes and duties). The court ruled in this case that DSLU is exempted from the payment of taxes. Article XIV, Section 4 (3) of the 1987 Constitutions states that: (3) All revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt .from taxes and duties. Upon the dissolution or cessation of the corporate existence of such institutions, their assets shall be disposed of in the manner provided by law. The last paragraph of Section 30 of the Tax Code without force and effect for being contrary to the Constitution insofar as it subjects to tax the income and revenues of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions used actually, directly and exclusively for educational purpose. The court make this declaration in the exercise of and consistent with their duty to uphold the primacy of the Constitution.