Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Webinar Konstruksi Kayu PDF
Webinar Konstruksi Kayu PDF
Webinar Konstruksi Kayu PDF
D
Dosen Universitas Gadjah Mada
Konstruksi kayu
Utilization; Engineering Properties; Research and projects
Teaching Subjects
1. Timber and Bamboo Engineering
Ali Awaludin, Ph.D 2. Steel Structures
Associate Professor 3. Strength of Materials
Phone/fax: +62 274 545675 (office) 4. Continua Mechanics
E-mail : ali.awaludin@ugm.ac.id
BEST FOR You 2
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Timber – steel composite bridge test, in Hokkaido, Japan (2007)
Wood Utilization
Wood utilization in different scale
Plywood Glulam
BEST FOR You Oriented Strand Board (OSB)
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Piano kayu dengan metal pipe
Contents
Pesawat Hughes H-4 Hercules atau dikenal sebagai The Spruce Goose,
merupakan pesawat terbang yang terbuat dari material kayu. Dibuat pada
tahun 1944 dan berhasil diterbangkan pertama kali pada tahun 1947
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Railways Sleepers
©Makhfudz-sappe, 2011
©Makhfudz-sappe, 2011
Examples:
Green concrete or geopolymer concrete, self-healing
concrete, ultra-high performance fiber reinforced
concrete, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP), Engineered
Wood Products such as: glulam, laminated veneer
lumbers (LVL), cross laminated timber (CLT), etc.
Timber Life Cycle
Old
Photosynthesis rate
Young
Tree age
Banjir Bandang
Wassior (Oktober 2010)
Engineering
Properties of Wood
Content
Wood Structure
Grading Methods
Durability
Thermal Properties
Splitting Failures
Connections and washers
Directional properties
Because of the orientation of the wood fibers
and the manner in which a tree increases in
diameter as it grows, properties vary along
three mutually perpendicular axes:
longitudinal, radial, and tangential.
Although most wood properties differ in each of these three axis directions, differences
between the radial and tangential axes are relatively minor when compared to
difference between the radial or tangential axis and the longitudinal axis. We now have
only parallel and perpendicular to the grain concept.
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Wood structure
Parallel to grain
Tensile forces = fiber fractures
Compression forces = buckling fibers
Perpendicular-to-grain
Compression force = Low MoE, large
ductility index, strain hardening
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Wood stress-strain relation
Parallel to grain
Perpendicular-to-grain
60
Strength class M
20
50
Strength class L Strength class H
40
15
30
10
20
10 5
0
6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 0
MOE (GPa) 0 5 10 15 20 25
MoR
MoE SF
Lab* SNI** SNI***
(1) (2) (3) (1)/(3)
5000 15 2 5.1 2.89
8000 33 5.5 14.0 2.34
11000 51 9.1 23.1 2.19
14000 69 12.6 32.0 2.15
17000 87 16.5 41.9 2.07
20000 105 19.7 50.0 2.09
23000 123 23.2 58.9 2.08
* MoR = 0.006*MoE - 15.3 (MPa)
** Tabel 4.2.1 Nilai Desain Acuan SNI 7973: 2013
*** SNI*** = SNI** x KF, Konversi Format = 2.54 for Bending
SF Bernilai 2.0 sd 3.0
Melia azedarach
Swietenia mahagoni
Pterospermum javanicum
Large diameter
bolts in use
Analytical solution:
d=2r
K I Cs r = 250.5 kN/m3/2
sym
FEM:
b
Crack width: r/200
KI = 269 kN/m3/2
s KII = 3.49 kN/m3/2
F F Crack model
Assumptions:
1. Elastic isotropic properties
2. Plane-strain analysis
2
K I F K II F
1 0
K IC K IIC
Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics
(LEFM)
Example of mix mode
fracture:
2.22
K IRL K IIRL
RL RL 1 0
K IC K IIC
Jernkvist L O, 2001, Fracture of wood under mix mode loading II. Experimental investigation of Picea abies,
Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 68, pp. 565-576.
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Effect of dowel location
2F 2F
f=D ah f = D 2D
h = 6D h = 6D
F F
4D F a F
20D 20D
260 240
D = 22 mm, t = 44 mm D = 16 mm, t = 48 mm
226 N/mm
220 200
Lateral load, f , (N/mm)
5.72 kN At e nd At hole
5
4D f4.1mm
No Screw 6 Plybamboo -6mm
BEST FOR You
0 2 4 8
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y Reinforcement type
Joint reinforcements
For many timber designers, bolts are still the first choice due to the fact that
bolts are relatively easy and quick to install and require no surface
preparation.
Although easily installed, bolted connections are extremely complex
regarding the response mechanism to various loadings, mainly
inherent to the anisotropic and variable characteristics of the
surrounding wood.
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Lateral resistance of a bolted joint
Z
Load carrying capacity (Z) of bolted timber joint can be
evaluated using: Yield theory; Beam on elastic
foundation theory; or Spring model based fracture
mechanic approach.
The yield theory does not take fastener axial force into
consideration so that it naturally underestimates the joint
strength.
Z/2 Z/2
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Joints: Load-slip curve
50
» I: Initially steep, both wood and fasteners are (II)
within elastic response. 40
» II: After the fastener or the wood embedment (I) (III)
Load (KN)
reaches its elastic limit, less steep. 30
Ultimate-load (kN)
50 50 50
Yield-load
Ultimate-load
L ateral load (kN )
40 40 40
30 30 30
Yield-load (kN)
20 20 20
10 10 10
0 0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Join t slip (m m )
Fastener secondary axial force is well indicated by the slope of final stiffness of experimental
load-slip curves. Some researchers associated
BEST FOR thisYoumechanism as “rope” or “cable” effect.
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Joints with inserted plate
30
20
Load (kN)
10
0
-5 0 5 10 15 20
-10
-20
BEST FOR You Slip (mm)
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Example
Material properties:
Myb Myb
fe = 26.62 N/mm2
Myb
t1 = 47 mm
D = 12 mm
fe fe fe fy = 413 N/mm2
fe
b b1 b1
a1 a1 Myb = fyD3/6 = 118,944 Nmm
Ze Zf t1 Zg
t1 t1
= 30.03 kN
= 24.66 kN
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Beam on elasto-plastic foundation model
solved by FEM
y, w
p(x)
Bolt (f = D)
x=0 ka
i j
x, u
L x = t1+ts/2
u = 0; w’ = 0 u=0
t1 p(x)
ts
0.5
0.77w
w 1.6 mm p (0.33 0.005w)1 exp( )
500 0.33
Material model: 413 MPa 0.4
400
p (kN/mm)
Tensile stress (Mpa)
0.2 w
200
0.1
f = 12 mm
100
0
0.2% w 1.6 mm
p 0.3299 exp 0.0131(w 1.6)2
0.0
0 0.005 0.01
BEST
0.015
0.02
FOR
0.025
You
0.03 0 1 2 3 4 5
Strain O(mm/mm)
R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y w (mm)
Effect of washer dimension
55
EYM yield load
* Ignoring the washer effect
Yield-load
47.07 kN
45 Ultimate-load
Average 40.84 kN
Yield- and ultimate-load (kN)
35
33.50 kN
25 23.01 kN
20.88 kN 21.47 kN
*17.58 kN
15
5
13 13 13
40 60 80
18.5 kN
Washer: 60x60x4.3mm3
Wood: 93.5x93.5x250mm3
Material properties:
1. Wood member (Picea jezoensis) Anisotropic plasticity model
Ex 4720 MPa nxy 0.37 Etx 140 MPa Gtxy 10 MPa
Ey 378 MPa nyz 0.47 Ety 11 MPa Gtyz 1 MPa
Ez 236 MPa nxz 0.42 Etz 7 MPa Gtxz 9.5 MPa
Gxy 337 MPa sx 18 MPa txy 4.08 MPa
Gyz 33.7 MPa sy 3.73 MPa tyz 0.93 MPa
Gxz 317 MPa sz 3.72 MPa txz 3.09 MPa
2. Steel plate
E 195.4 GPa syield BEST
308.7 MPaFOR You n 0.3 Elasto-plastic model
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
FE-Analysis vs. Test results
30 30
Various washer dimension Washer: 60x60mm2
25 25
80x80mm2
20 20
Lo a d (kN)
Lo a d (kN)
60x60mm2
15 40x40mm2 15
10 10 ri=13mm 60mm
ri=13mm
ro=25mm
5 5 60mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
Embe dme nt (mm) Embe dme nt (mm)
30 30
Washer: 40x40mm2 Washer: 80x80mm2
25 25
20 20
Lo a d (kN)
Lo a d (kN)
15 15
10 10 ri=13mm 80mm
5 ri=13mm 40mm 5
80mm
40mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 BEST
5 FOR You0 1 2 3 4 5
Embe dme nt (mm) O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Embe dme nt (mm)
Part 3
Timber research
and projects
Content
Detailed information:
Minimum discharge, 20 l/s
Pressure head, 9 m
Length of Wood stave pipeline, 30 m
Diameter of wood stave pipeline, 0.5 m
Calculated energy potential, 1 kW
Source: nzwood.com
Material formed by bonding wood veneer with a phenol-formaldehide
based adhesive.
Veneers are aligned with similar orientation with the length of the member.
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
©Makhfudz-sappe, 2011
Melalui teknologi yang ada, produk kayu rekayasa memiliki kualitas yang lebih baik jika dibandingkan
dengan kayu utuh tanpa pengolahan lebih lanjut.
Perbandingan sifat mekanik Kayu Sengon dengan LVL Sengon (Awaludin, dkk., 2018)
Dengan demikian, material kayu dapat diaplikasikan pada bangunan dengan skala penggunaan yang
lebih luas.
BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
An example of LVL House for Low-income People
Load (kN)
10
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Deflection (mm)
5000
4000
Lateral load ( N )
3000
2000
1000
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04
Drift ratio (rad) BEST FOR You
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
Prefabricated Timber – Concrete Composite Floor
60
50
40 Fail
Load (kN)
30
20 TJS
Timber Joist
10 Conventional Composite Floor
CCF
Prefabricated Composite Floor
PCF
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Mid span displacement (mm)
Easy Erection
Easy Modular Segment Simple
Transportation Knock Down Equipment
UGM to Site
System
Precision
Bamboo culms
were used as
Helpful!
± 23 km Light Weight temporary support
Cheap
Deflection (mm)
-2.8
-4
1 CONFIGURATION A 2 CONFIGURATION B -4.7
-5.2
-6
Maximum -6.6
-8 -7.3
deflection, load
along the bridge span -10
-9.8
where there were 45
students in total or Configuration B Configuration A
400 kgf/m2 is 9.8 mm Configuration C
< L/200
(30 mm) Deflection of the bridge model under
3 CONFIGURATION C static pedestrian load
The prototype bridge has first natural frequency of 19.9 Field test indicate the bridge has first natural frequency
Hz and damping ratio of 3.57% BEST FOR You of 13.5 Hz and damping ratio of 5.62 %
O R G A N I C S C O M P A N Y
BRIDGE PERFORMANCE
0.16 0.4 0.3117191
2
0,089 0.3
0.1
0.2
Acceleration (g)
Accleration (g)
0.0663067
0.04 0,01 55 0.0058185
0,0009 0.1
71
-0.02 0
-0.1
-0.08
-0.2
-0.14 -0.3
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4
Time (s) Time (s)
Added Concrete
Time vs. Acceleration of the bridge Time vs. Acceleration of the bridge Slab at the Top of
on laboratory due to an impact load on site due to an impact load
Deck (of 50 mm
Damping =3,57% Damping = 5,62% thick)
Nf = 19,9 Hz Nf = 13,5 Hz
ali.awaludin@ugm.ac.id
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali_Awaludin