Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fatigue Strength Analysis of Petrol Engine Connecting-Rodwith An Interference Fit Using Fem
Fatigue Strength Analysis of Petrol Engine Connecting-Rodwith An Interference Fit Using Fem
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Florida International University on 09/20/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
1933
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009
1934 ICTE 2009
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009
ICTE 2009 1935
The connecting rod bearing bush assembly pre-tightening force, The connecting
rod bearing bush assembly pre-tightening force by surface strength form function on
contact face.
(2) Inertia force
When the piston arrives at the top dead center, the connecting rod receives the
biggest inertia force, this strength reflects the stretch effect, because the connecting
rod receiving the force of inertia is produced together by the piston group and the
connecting rod group, acting on gudgeon pin, so, when loading, an inertial force is
added averagely on gudgeon pin.
(3) Biggest explosion pressure
During the period of acting traveling schedule, the connecting rod receives the
biggest explosion pressure which by the piston and the gudgeon pin passed on, to the
connecting rod, the application of force object is the biggest explosion pressure
function on the piston pin as gudgeon pin loading. In the biggest explosion pressure
conditions, the connecting rod not only withstands the pre-tight operating mode load,
but also withstands the biggest explosion pressure of acting traveling schedule, this
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009
1936 ICTE 2009
load exerts according to the cosine distribution rule on the small connecting rod head.
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Florida International University on 09/20/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009
ICTE 2009 1937
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Florida International University on 09/20/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
Where, V 1D is fatigue strength tensile pressure at the symmetric case, V 1D =˄0.7~
0.9˅ V 1 ˗ V 1 is bending fatigue strength at the symmetric case, V 1 =˄0.45~0.6˅
V b ˗ V b is the ultimate strength. H V is rough surface impact factor of parts, it can be
defined to 0.5~0.7 when the surface has not been processed for the structural steel,
which is the largest alternating stress amplitude. \ V is the fatigue life cycle
characteristics factor that can show the effect of the average stress on the ripple part.
It can be difined that \ V =0.2. V a is cycle stress amplitude. V m is the average cycle
stress. The safety factors of test area on the connecting rod are shown in Table 2. The
allowable value of safety factor is in the range from 1.5 to 2.5[5]. In order to verify
the correctness of the calculation, electric fatigue test is carried, and the experiment
is shown in Table 2ˈIt can be seen in this article on the link made by the theoretical
analysis is a fundamental rightDŽ
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009
1938 ICTE 2009
It can be seen that measured test data is bigger than results coming from the
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Florida International University on 09/20/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
finite element method, which is mainly due to the effect of choice of contact angle on
the stress near big and small end. The smaller the value of contact angle, the greater
the stress results. Generally, the contact angle can adopt 120°~180°. The value is
120° in the paper, so the calculating value is larger.
However, whether the value of the finite element method or the value of the test,
the value of safety factor in some area is still close to the low limit, which is mainly
due to the lightweight design for the current engine, and the reserve of strength is not
very well-off. Through the use of real vehicle for years, the strength of rod meet the
fatigue requirement.
4 Conclusion
The connecting-rod group should be taken as the object and the contact relations
between various components should be considered when building a connecting-rod
finite element model, which can simulate the stress situations of the connecting-rod
in the operating mode such as bolt pretightening force, the superhard bearing bush
and the service load.
Through examing the Von Mises stress in the high stress regions of
connecting-rod’s various essential spot, and estimating the fatigue safety coefficient
to these spots, it has been proven that the various areas’ safety coefficients in the
connecting-rod are all in the design permission scope, and it is safe. Then the
connecting-rod's reliability has been validited by the experiment.
5 Acknowledgment
This paper is support by the project of shanxi province science foundation (No:
2007021023) and the project of Shanxi Youth Science Leader Foundation (No:
20081066) and Doctor Starting-up Foundation of Taiyuan University of Science and
Technology (No: 200666).
References
Zhou yun(1993). “Automobile encyclopedia”, Beijing: China Machine Press.
Wu Fumin(1985). “Structure fatigue strength”, Chengdu: Northwestern
Polytechnical University press.
Su Tiexiong, Lv Caiqin(2002). “Contact question to the influence of connecting-
rod’s finite element analysis”. Combustion engine transaction ,2, pp:22̚24
Lu Jiqing,Shen Zujing(1993). “Motor car engine design”.Beijing: Tsinghua
University press
Optasanu, V., and Bonneau, D(2000). ‘‘Finite Element Mass-Conserving Cavitation
Algorithm in Pure Squeeze Motion Validation/Application to a Connecting
Rod Small End Bearing,’’ Transaction of the ASME, 122, pp. 162–169.
Copyright ASCE 2009 International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009 (ICTE 2009)
International Conference on Transportation Engineering 2009