INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA JAIME DUQUE GRISALES ENGLISH

Reconocida Oficialmente como Establecimiento de Educación Teacher: Luz Stella

Formal por Resolución 8951-6 del 6 de noviembre de 2018 de la Pineda Gomez
Secretaría de Educación Departamental de Caldas Grade: 11TH
Tiempo previsto:6
hours
Fecha de entrega:
May – 22nd-20
May – 11th – 2020
Guia # 3

FELIPE MARTINEZ GUTIERREZ 11-1

HOMEWORK
TEMA: PRESENT PERFECT CONTINUOS
APRENDIZAJE: Es capaz de producir textos sencillos y coherentes sobre temas que le son
familiares o en los que tiene un interés personal.
OBJETIVO: -Repasa verbos regulares e irregulares en tiempo progresivo
-Reconoce y usa en un contexto el tiempo present perfect continuos

PRESENT PERFECT CONTINUOUS

• present perfect progressive, sirve para expresar que una acción que ha comenzado en el
pasado sigue ocurriendo en el presente. Este tiempo pone la duración de la acción.
Structure:
Subject + Auxiliar have + to be in past participle + ppal verb in gerund
In this tense are used the expresions SINCE , FOR
EXAMPLE:

Aaron has been repairing cars since he was sixteen years old. He has always wanted to be a
mechanic.
He has been working in this garage for ten years.
As Aaron has been changing tyres all morning, his clothes are dirty now.

INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA JAIME DUQUE GRISALES ENGLISH

Reconocida Oficialmente como Establecimiento de Teacher: Luz Stella
 Educación Formal por Resolución 8951-6 del 6 de Pineda Gomez
noviembre de 2018 de la Secretaría de Educación Grade: 11TH
Departamental de Caldas Tiempo previsto:6
hours
Fecha de entrega:
May – 22nd-20
May – 11th –
2020
Guia # 3

NEGATIVE FORM:
STRUCTURE: SUBJECT (I , YOU, WE , THEY ) + HAVEN’T+BEEN+PPAL VERB ING
SUBJECT (HE, SHE, IT ) + HASN’T + BEEN + PPAL VERB ING
EXAMPLE
WE HAVENT BEEN UNDERSTANDING ENGLISH CLASS DURING THE PANDEMIC DESEASE

INTERROGATIVE FORM:
STRUCTURE : HAVE / HAS + SUBJECT + BEEN+ PPAL VERB IN GERUND (ING )
EXAMPLE:
HAVE WE BEEN UNDERSTANDING THE MATH CLASS ?
YES, WE HAVE.
HAS MY SISTER BEEN CLEANING HER BEDROOM IN WEEKEND ?

Afirmativa Negativa Interrogativa

I, you, we, I have I have not been speaking Have I been speaking?
they been speaking
he has been
he/she/it he has not been speaking Has he been speaking?
speaking

INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA JAIME DUQUE GRISALES ENGLISH

Reconocida Oficialmente como Establecimiento de Teacher: Luz Stella
Educación Formal por Resolución 8951-6 del 6 de Pineda Gomez
noviembre de 2018 de la Secretaría de Educación Grade: 11TH
Departamental de Caldas Tiempo previsto:6
hours
Fecha de entrega:
May – 22nd-20
May – 11th –
2020
Guia # 3
 Contraction

La contracción consiste en la combinación de ciertos pronombres personales, verbos y la

partícula de negación not. Este recurso se emplea sobre todo en la lengua hablada y en
textos escritos en un registro informal. La finalidad es aligerar la producción oral y dotar de
naturalidad al enunciado.
Complete form Contraction Example
have …’ve they’ve
have not …’ve not/… haven’t I’ve not/I haven’t
has …’s she’s
has not …’s not/… hasn’t he’s not/he hasn’t

WITH A CLICK IN THIS LINK YOU FIND THE EXPLICACION OF PRESENT PERFECT CONTINUOS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-h1wJxLzXQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRl2HDCy_8o

INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA JAIME DUQUE GRISALES ENGLISH

Reconocida Oficialmente como Establecimiento de Teacher: Luz Stella
Educación Formal por Resolución 8951-6 del 6 de Pineda Gomez
noviembre de 2018 de la Secretaría de Educación Grade: 11TH
Departamental de Caldas Tiempo previsto:6
hours
Fecha de entrega:
May – 22nd-20
May – 11th –
2020
Guia # 3

PRACTICE

Completa las oraciones siguientes con have o has para formar el present perfect continuous.

• I HAVE been working all day.
• She HAS been studying all morning.
• You HAVE been eating the whole time.
 • William HAS been sleeping for four hours.
• Kate and Rian HAVE been arguing for half an hour.

Conjuga los verbos entre paréntesis en present perfect continuous.

• Claire (teach) TEACHING English since 2006.
• We (look) LOOKED for that document all day.
• Mr Smith (speak) SPEAKING on the phone for two hours.
• The students are exhausted because they (take) TAKING a difficult test.
• He (live) LIVING here since he was a child.

Formula oraciones interrogativas en present perfect continuous.

• (How long/we/wait/for her) how long we waiting for her?
• (How long/she/learn/English) how long she learning english?
• (How long/they/go out with each other) how long they goin out with each other?
• (How long/you/exercise)  how long you exercise?
• (How long/he/sit/there) how long he sitting here?

INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA JAIME DUQUE GRISALES ENGLISH

Reconocida Oficialmente como Establecimiento de Teacher: Luz Stella
Educación Formal por Resolución 8951-6 del 6 de Pineda Gomez
noviembre de 2018 de la Secretaría de Educación Grade: 11TH
Departamental de Caldas Tiempo previsto:6
hours
Fecha de entrega:
May – 22nd-20
May – 11th –
2020
Guia # 3

READ AN ARTICLE ABOUT ROBOT TEACHERS TO PRACTICE AND IMPROVE YOUR READING SKILLS.
• TRANSLATE THE TEXT
• CHANGE THE TEXT TO PRESENT PERFECT CONTINUOS
• ANSWER THE QUESTIONS.

If you think of the jobs robots could never do, you would probably put
doctors and teachers at the top of the list. It's easy to imagine robot
cleaners and factory workers, but some jobs need human connection and
creativity. But are we underestimating what robots can do? In some cases,
they already perform better than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some
patients might feel more comfortable sharing personal information with a
machine than a person. Could there be a place for robots in education after
all?

British education expert Anthony Eldon thinks so. And he even has a date for
the robot takeover of the classroom: 2027. He predicts robots will do the
main job of transferring information and teachers will be like assistants.
Intelligent robots will read students' faces, movements and maybe even
brain signals. Then they will adapt the information to each student. It's not a
popular opinion and it's unlikely robots will ever have empathy and the
ability to really connect with humans like another human can.

One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all.
In some parts of the world, there aren't enough teachers and 9–16 per
cent of children under the age of 14 don't go to school. That problem could
be partly solved by robots because they can teach anywhere and won't get
stressed, or tired, or move somewhere for an easier, higher-paid job.

Those negative aspects of teaching are something everyone agrees on.

Teachers all over the world are leaving because it is a difficult job and they
feel overworked. Perhaps the question is not 'Will robots replace
teachers?' but 'How can robots help teachers?' Office workers can use
software to do things like organize and answer emails, arrange meetings and
update calendars. Teachers waste a lot of time doing non-teaching work,
including more than 11 hours a week marking homework. If robots could cut
the time teachers spend marking homework and writing reports, teachers
would have more time and energy for the parts of the job humans do best.

TRADUCCION

Si piensa en los trabajos que los robots nunca podrían hacer, probablemente colocaría a los

médicos y maestros en la parte superior de la lista. Es fácil imaginar robots de limpieza y

trabajadores de fábricas, pero algunos trabajos necesitan conexión humana y creatividad. ¿Pero

estamos subestimando lo que los robots pueden hacer? En algunos casos, ya se desempeñan

mejor que los médicos para diagnosticar enfermedades. Además, algunos pacientes pueden

sentirse más cómodos compartiendo información personal con una máquina que una persona.

¿Podría haber un lugar para los robots en la educación después de todo?

El experto en educación británico Anthony Eldon cree que sí. E incluso tiene una fecha para la

toma del robot en el aula: 2027. Él predice que los robots harán el trabajo principal de transferir

información y los maestros serán como asistentes. Los robots inteligentes leerán las caras, los

movimientos e incluso las señales cerebrales de los estudiantes. Luego adaptarán la información
a cada alumno. No es una opinión popular y es poco probable que los robots alguna vez tengan

empatía y la capacidad de conectarse realmente con los humanos como otra lata humana.

Sin embargo, una cosa es segura. Un maestro robot es mejor que ningún maestro. En algunas

partes del mundo, no hay suficientes maestros y entre el 9 y el 16 por ciento de los niños

menores de 14 años no van a la escuela. Los robots podrían resolver ese problema en parte

porque pueden enseñar en cualquier lugar y no se estresarán, se cansarán ni se mudarán a otro

lugar para un trabajo más fácil y mejor remunerado.

Esos aspectos negativos de la enseñanza son algo en lo que todos están de acuerdo. Los

profesores de todo el mundo se van porque es un trabajo difícil y se sienten sobrecargados de

trabajo. Quizás la pregunta no es '¿Los robots reemplazarán a los maestros?' pero "¿Cómo

pueden los robots ayudar a los maestros?" Los empleados de oficina pueden usar software para

hacer cosas como organizar y responder correos electrónicos, organizar reuniones y actualizar

calendarios. Los maestros pierden mucho tiempo haciendo trabajos no docentes, que incluyen

más de 11 horas a la semana marcando la tarea. Si los robots pudieran reducir el tiempo que los

maestros pasan marcando la tarea y escribiendo informes, los maestros tendrían más tiempo y

energía para las partes del trabajo que los humanos hacen mejor.

PERFECT CONTINUOS

If you think of the jobs robots could never do, you would probably put doctors and
teachers at the top of the list. It's easy to imagine robot cleaners and factory
workers, but some jobs need human connection and creativity. But are we
underestimating what robots can do? In some cases, they already perform better
than doctors at diagnosing illness. Also, some patients might feel more
comfortable sharing personal information with a machine than a person. Could
there be a place for robots in education after all?
British education expert Anthony Eldon thinks so. And he even has a date for the
robot takeover of the classroom: 2027. He predicts robots will do the main job of
transferring information and teachers will be like assistants. Intelligent robots will
read students' faces, movements and maybe even brain signals. Then they will
adapt the information to each student. It's not a popular opinion and it's unlikely
robots will ever have empathy and the ability to really connect with humans like
another human can.
One thing is certain, though. A robot teacher is better than no teacher at all. In
some parts of the world, there aren't enough teachers and 9–16 per cent of
children under the age of 14 don't go to school. That problem could be partly
solved by robots because they can teach anywhere and won't get stressed, or
tired, or move somewhere for an easier, higher-paid job.
Those negative aspects of teaching are something everyone agrees on. Teachers
all over the world are leaving because it is a difficult job and they feel overworked.
Perhaps the question is not 'Will robots replace teachers?' but 'How can robots
help teachers?' Office workers can use software to do things like organize and
answer emails, arrange meetings and update calendars. Teachers waste a lot of
time doing non-teaching work, including more than 11 hours a week marking
homework. If robots could cut the time teachers spend marking homework and
writing reports, teachers would have more time and energy for the parts of the
job humans do best.
Reading B1: Robot teachers – 1
Are the sentences true or false?

1. Most jobs seem as if they can be done by robots or computers.

True

False

2. Robots are always better at diagnosing illnesses than doctors.

True

False

3. Many experts agree robots will replace teachers by 2027.

True

False

4. One advantage of robot teachers is that they don't need to rest.

True

False

5. Robot assistants could help teachers by marking homework and writing reports.

True

False

6. Some teachers use robots to reduce their time answering emails and marking homework.

True

False

Reading B1: Robot teachers – 2

Choose the best answer.

It's easy to think robots …

will replace people even if we don't like the idea.

are more capable than people and it's true.

can do less than people but it's not always true.