Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Erik Peterson Case Analysis (C & D) : Executive Summary
Erik Peterson Case Analysis (C & D) : Executive Summary
This is a case about a manger who completes his job with competence, but faces trouble
without knowing the causes to the core problems. Recommendations are imperative.
Executive Summary
1. Peterson failed to prepare and plan for top management visit. Peterson should update
Jenkins on his plan to solve the issues and then schedule an official visit with HQ.
2. Peterson failed to maintain good relationship with Scott Green. Instead of dwelling on the
past and criticizing Green’s decisions, Peterson should step down to actively support
Green’s leadership and manage staff members.
Recommendations
1. Peterson should communicate directly with Jenkins and HQ. Instead of basing his
overconfidence to solve the problems and convincing Knight of his excellent problem
solving skills, Peterson should update Jenkins on his plan to solve the KOL and
manufacturing issues at Costa Rica. Specifically, Peterson should meet with his team, set
up targets, designate tasks, and report the business plan to Jenkins. Afterwards, Peterson
should efficiently manage the top management’s visit by assembling his staff members,
planning agendas for each day of visit, and communicating schedule with HQ.
2. Peterson should assume a positive role in supporting Green. Instead of dwelling on the
past and criticizing Green’s decisions, Peterson should step down to actively support
Green’s leadership and manage staff members. Specifically, Peterson should convey his
capacity to achieve Green’s plan by applying his lessons to organize and staff members in
alignment with Green’s decisions. This will allow Peterson to manage his own boss by
earning Green’s trust and responsibilities and eventually raise his team’s morale as the
reinstated leader.