Carnivores

In the palatinate realm of

Dharma, Artha &
inconspicuous Vedic
Sciences

Acharya Agnivrat
Nasik
consent

I was researching Honorable Hrishikalpa Muni Shri

Agnivrat ji 's book "Carnivores (in the context of faith,
sense and science). Acharyaji has proven that meat is
not in any way should be eaten by humans and has
dismissed Mr Farooq 's half-truthful claims. I hope no
smart individual can ever consume non-vegetarian,
meaty, and undigested things after reading this novel.
It is important that all these wise people advocate
these issues more and more and seek to improve
vegetarianism.

Satyan and Vedavgish Acharya

Smriti Bhawan, Jodhpur, Maharishi Daysan

Publishing house

The distinction between man and beast is intelligence.

God's Supreme Father made man the world's
smartest guy. It is up to humans to defend these
species and the ecosystem. God has provided all kinds
of good, tasty foods for human consumption,
including fruits, meat, herbs, dried fruit, etc. Yet the
cruel human proceeded to consume a ton of poor
creatures free of conscience to please him.

Many so-called educated nobility are attempting to

scientifically prove sins like carnivores to kill Indian
society, humanity and the Vedic faith. Some in the
name of eating freedom, some with scientific and
economic evidence, some with the idea that we won't
eat them and then the animal count will rise
considerably. Mohammad Farooq Khanji, who wrote
a brief booklet whole "compassion and Carnivores"
and attempted to speak in favour of non-vegetarians
without success. Acharya ji replied by writing a book
called Carnivores-In the light of faith, sense and
science to give him a rational answer to all that. Every
of his claims he blasted in this. A updated edition of
the same text, seeking to include several new parts,
focuses on the Acharyaji's own chants, is now being
written.

Many of our seers' texts were adulterated by so-called

Brahmin or Vedic enemies, and the scriptures
distorted and misinterpreted, which implies that
there have been carnivores included in the texts of
the seer. The men of the anti-Vedas are utilizing this
and criticizing these fantastic documents. This book
also refers to the refusal of such accusations in the
texts of the seer.

Through reading this novel, I hope that citizens will

stop being misled and that all the educated and
civilized will renounce meat , fish , poultry, etc., saving
people from many illnesses, cleaning the world and
growing natural outbreaks. May innocent beings, like
mercy, compassion in the world, live and enhance
human qualities, create an environment of peace and
joy in the world. It is hoped that the illuminated
readers would seriously consider reading this novel.
For the same sort of optimism

Vishal Arya, Vice President, Agniyash Vedarthi.

M.Sc. University of Delhi Theoretical Physics
Institute for Study in Vedic and Traditional Physics

Rolls in Introduction

Paropakarini Sabha, Islamic Literature publication

sent by Ajmer, Dowat Manzil, close Kalupur House,
printed and published by Ahmedabad-1, translated by
Shri Iqbal Meerjha into Hindi and written by Mr.
Muhammad Farooq Khan, entitled "Dayabhav and
Carnivores" 14 Dorsal text read. The author has
thoroughly drawn up the paper, with sound guidance
and factual inclusion. This is less likely to see positive
posts in favour of non-vegetarians, however the fact
of the Vedic thoughts and the ability to take facts and
to reject lies are not seen. For this cause, while the
article cores research, it remains a box of confusion,
awareness and futile claims, whereas an artist who
conducts his own studies in Vedic poetry. Thankfully!
Not just this, the post should have been absolutely
practical and gross, but still a treat. The speaker is
called upon to bring himself out of the well of Islam
and into humanity's free world and to reject the
falsehoods of a rational, compassionate spirit, and a
logical intellect, thus removing theological bigotry and
human unity's disparities. For the planning of the lane,
Throughout this holy job, I'm with you.

This short booklet, written in particular to respond to

Mr. Muhammad Farooq Khan 's post, is a nice and
appropriate document for all of the world's great
personalities who believe in and encourage meats and
meat-making, both positive, scientific and cultural. I
humbly urge them to open their eyes, brains and
heart to false indiscretions and closed hypocrites of
the reality, righteousness and real morality, etc., in
the Vedic period, spreading the tradition of
Carnivores and becoming carnivores of the Sages and
Kshatriya Kingdoms. Let nature consider and see, and
everyone has the same soul as us who are happy and
sorrowful as us, who never overlook this reality. Take
reality and the good dimension seriously and offer it
the chance to be named human in the true meaning,
by reflection on the subject of this booklet.

The job prevents the extension of the article to come

to a quick summary. You stated in the beginning that
those who consider carnivores as unjust and
unimportant-

"It is an strategy that can only draw the minds of the

unthinking, intuitive, and involved behaviours."

Analysis-In your perception just meat advocates,

philosophers and ideologists may be wise. This article
would only be checked. In terms of life and economy,
you write the word "meat"
"So it becomes impossible for humanity to exist in the
universe unless the dream of mercies and fairness
becomes recognized-among most people on earth-
the foundation of survival is on the flesh."

In countries like Europe, USA, Japan , China and so on

you have addressed comprehensive meat processing
and the fishing industry. The compulsory meat and
fish diet has been debated in the nation of Greenland
and Eskimo. In fact, there is also consideration of the
economics of fat, i.e. leather.

Study-Your Excellency, your declaration is that leaving

non-vegetarians would make life impossible for the
human race as the food shortage would intensify. But,
leaving non-vegetary food would so significantly raise
food crops that citizens would not be willing to feed.
Most of the countries addressed are the pioneers in
rice, fruit and milk development and consume raw,
volatile substances such as reintroduced tuna, then
They 're going to be tainted though. America itself is a
state-of-the-art nation with a lower population in
terms of production of food, but why is meat and
seafood eaten for hunger purposes? Why should this
awful state feed the animals there for the processing
of meat 70% of its calories. The need of world protein
will be met if it prevents meat development.

Flesh & Business

Throughout the novel Food for Tiny Planets reads

French woman scientist-

As for protein, Option for non-vegetarian meat is a

half-witted decision. The sum of protein America
feeds on bovine animals will fix the issue of
impoverished citizens in developing countries.
Average calf is 16 pounds grain and 1 pound meat, he
says. According to this scientist, He spends the
remaining 15 pounds on his bone, hair etc. Non-
vegetarians are certainly not the sole response to the
food shortage but the issue is important. There would
be no hunger in the world because all countries make
meat complete. Nor are filthy foods, simply non-
edible fish etc. necessary to be eaten. The analysis
found that 2 million tons, 24 million pounds, of
botanical protein were fed to livestock. Which type of
mathematics did you know, Say Muhammad? 10
rupees will be expended on 1 rupee. For 1 kg of beef,
the animals are fed 7 kg food. The volume of water is
already 7000 litres. So, in the era of increasing poverty
and serious water issues, who perpetrated their sin by
fooling non-vegetarians to a rising water and food
crisis. According to the American economist, a 4-
ounce hamburg can destroy 55 square feet of forest
by raising small chickens. According to a report in
California water use in 1 pound production is as
follows: greens of 20 gallons of broccoli, 25 gallons of
wheat, sev 49 gallons, 130 gallons of milking, 500
gallons of eggs, 1030 gallon of pork, 5219 gallon of
beef, etc.

The processing of 1Kg of wheat needs approximately

1,000 liters, according to Professor John Anthony
Allen of King's College , London, while 15 thousand
liters per 1Kg of meat and 3300 liters of water is
required per kg of eggs. More water is then used in
non-vegetarian cooking than in vegetarian cooking.

See banker! See farmer! You benefit the most from

your beloved edible beef economically and
biologically. The subject of wellbeing will be explored
further. Where the urban activists speak of the urgent
water crisis. In the nation and the States, there are
fighting for water, and one neighbour sometimes dies
for the water. The level of groundwater has decreased
slowly. There, you are creating a double sin by
promoting carnivores under the influence of a non-
vegetarian captive tongue, triggering a big problem in
fresh water and trees. Just look at the dumbness of
the Indian people. Do you consume public meat that
is starving in India or are you men who love pleasure
and cruelty?
Last year, our nation exports 21 million tons of food
grain. More than 500 g of food can be received per
person. In municipal stores, produce is decaying. The
stupid farmers come here to consume chickens, and
the sneaky sinner administration offers them
protection and opportunity, in millions of acres of dirt,
tea , coffee, tobacco, hemp, ganja and poppy. Rotten
millions of tons of grapes and jaggery render beer. By
malt, grain processed into, beer etc people are forced
towards sin-punk. All who knowfully may claim that
God missed bread, fruit and milk, owing to which
meat is required to consume fish, are thousands of
hectares of land unknown.

I know that vegetation may also be created, wherever

the origins of meat are animal birds, fish, etc, where
grain, grass and fruit are not obtainable through
effort. Why is it feasible on this world as citizens
picture livestock on the moon? There is a need for
good will and diligent work, so why live in it when
agriculture can not be done? Somebody stood in the
sky and said here is no food, no meat, no berries. So I
kill crows, ducks, adults and buzzers, I consume your
wish. Who will convince the Karmaless to consume
earth's nectar, honey, vegetables , grains and nuts. If
someone sits on the peak of Everest and demands
solutions for filling the butt, then consume two bits of
stone or rock. Of the Eskimo's carnivorous Randiers,
they also consume the animal's milk. It'd better like
fish the randier. Then always must be born the seed
of the plants that he consumes, so why does a human
not function there? When there is food, vegetable
seeds, and plants, but feeding fish is not hallucination,
what is it then? If there is no complete degree of
satiety from it, so if research is finished, then we will
go from there, even though there is a mistake. You
have already written: This is your meat-based
economic check-----

The ban to bite or killing livestock would generate a

concern with excess and worthless products.
Review- First of all, I want to wonder why you want
people on earth and no living creature. They aren't
God's children? To them, isn't your Lord Rahim?
Second point I like to know is why people really don't
feed pigs, crows, tigers, tigers, cheetahs or jackals.
Scorpions, lizards, barrs, wipes aren't eaten, so why
aren't they increasing? Yeah, certain carnivores eat
the pigs, crows, rats etc, Elsewhere. Instead the pigs
were prohibited and even discussed where they
should be housed. Remember, man is not the
contractor of all of this. God has absolute harmony
himself.

The third thing I would like to ask is that the maximum

number of human beings is increasing today.
Intellectuals around the world seem to be aware of
this. Misdeeds such as artificial family planning or
feticide are going on around the world. What can I say
about the increase in the number of four-four
marriages? Then they're going to start eating them,
too? Tell me, how would you like Sir? Everyone is
worried, and this meat is going to be better than any
other meat. Why shouldn't the flesh of a man who
eats milk, grain, nuts, fruit, etc.,feeding on cows,
buffalo, sheep, goats , and camels who eat dirty
things, be eaten? Sir Just think why didn't God give
such a command? Humans, pigs and carnivores have
remained the most worthy of mercy. Then the pig, the
man, the dog and the cat became brothers and
bruvver because of the closure of God. If yes, you
should give up drinking cow's milk, buffalo , goat, etc.
and drink boar, bitch, jackal milk , curd, melted butter,
enjoy the breasts of your dad. Because you have
special kindness to these animals. BDid you name the
Bhud's meat haraam? Can't I understand whose name
is Bhud? Based on the study of the Quran and based
on your description, the meaning of Bhud appears to
be boar. If there is any other meaning to that, please
let us know. Please have your say-

In fact, Bhud is regarded in Islam as morally

prohibited. Food has an impact on mankind, too. The
Bhud's flesh generates impudence within itself and
eats it makes man's condition even smaller! Bhud's an
animal that's smarmy. Male husks gather and mate
each other around the female husk. That's the
culmination of humiliation. Something that only other
animals can see.
Study- Only barbaric animal slayers are shockingly
concerned about morality. The pig was known as a
goofy animal. I ask whether hen, goats, cows, bison,
sheep are wearing burqas or saree, so it looks nice to
wear pijamas, caps and sherwani or dhoti or to paint
them. It involves the life together of many husbands
of a woman, which can be seen in all the animals that
travel freely in the herd and have a long
mating season. Look then only at the individual,
where some people have simultaneous contacts with
many women. How did a male contact with many
women become gentleness and decency when the
contact between many men and a female is
shameless? So these human beings gangs rape and kill
people in religious protests and often even in the
usual circumstances, so who should be compared to
that person is just contemplating. I do want to note,
in answer to your point, that when the food effect is
acknowledged (meat). The meat of the lazy
intellectual is to be consumed, leaving the filthy hen,
the rooster and the herbivore and naked sly creatures.
Then you will know your point is absurd and pointless.
Animal & birds knowingly coitus, so how can they be
confused while eating? And why not eat the crow's
meat that almost nobody saw while cohabiting side by
side. It is counterproductive to self-finance through
unfounded claims. If the gulf of protein is consuming
meat. So pork, with 49% fat, is the most nutritious
that no meat contains. Cow, horse, goat, cow,
cabbage and bacon are nutritionally lower than
bacon, though uric acid also contains higher levels of
harmful material than pork. Whereas the statistics in
beef are only 14.45%, in pork, pork is just 8.48%, while
beef is digested in 5.25 hours, and in 5.50 hours. In all
ways, pork is equivalent to beef. And why should you
are prohibited to have pork meat? How is it written in
the Quran? Why everyone needs to decide then? Say
the reason, not the bias of a single faith, which is in
the interests of everyone. Then I will say also who is
following Qur'an 's orders. See what Muhammad
Sahab says about Hazrat---

He drained the blood of the dead animals and the

swine meat on you. "See Sura Bakar, Par, Sayakul,
verse 173.

What eats the living animal like a dog cat, or swallows

alive like a snake, or a crocodile or a lizard? If anyone
says he can feed by killing himself, not dead, I will tell
you first that where is written in the Quran? It is
written that the dead animal is forbidden. And how
proven yourself to be murdered? If we think that too,
so every slaughterhouses in India and in the world
need to be shut down instantly because their eaters
have proven unfaithful by disobeying the Quran and
the penalty for the unfaithful is death. Then first of all,
all who ingest beef, therefore the butchers who assist
in infidelization, will first of all be punished with
death. For someone who considers himself Islamist
who wants to consume beef, chicken, hen, take it and
enjoy it. But kill yourself, even if you're not doing so.
This is not mine or Vedic, but the law needs to be
clarified. You defined blood as the first human food of
your story, while your blood was named immoral by
your Rasul or Father. We agree together, with God or
Rasul, whether the blood is the meal of human
beings?
Meat isn't fuel for humans

You published it
'A gentle man 's diet can also be eggs and beef. You
don't realize that meat and blood is man's first meal.
He is born by flesh or blood in her mother's womb.
Analysis-Despite the help of research, you became
immersed in stupidity and managed to fool even the
re-enlightened. This is wonderful because the infant
receives all of the nutrients in the womb of the
mother from the milk of the mother, but it is
completely incorrect to use meat. The food the
mother provides in the form of juice leads to the
blood production of the child. I wonder if it's the most
natural thing to drink the blood of your mother and
consume beef, would you think? There is a non-
vegetarian supporter in the world , especially anyone
who features false sophists like yourself who can
destroy their mother and consume her. During the
point, I suggest that the child's placenta and not the
mouth collect the mother's blood. The infant then
behaves as part of the mother. Just as the food in our
body, the liver, the belly, the duodenum and the
intestines, along with the blood, feed all our organs,
the fetus, in the same way the body of the mother
feeds. This cycle takes place not just in human beings,
but in all things. And donkey, dog, horse, pig, bear,
rabbit are going to tell us to consume meat? Your
primary diet was always the mother's flesh and blood
in your eyes. You appear to try to mislead others with
biochemical stupidity. I challenge you if you want to
sophisticate yourself, will you do it?

1. His mother's blood and many things drink by the

navel.
2. The egg would be unhealthy by your reasoning, so
is it going to go away?
3. In the womb, even the excreta is excreted only by
the mother's organs and not by her own organs, are
we still going to do that? When you can't, so is the
claim proven to be a sand wall palace or not?

Your argument is accurate that India's shortage of

milk is due to racial spoilage, which is worth
remembering. But it is extremely immoral and
unnatural to kill those animals that stop giving milk.
Any economist will kill and eat sick and elderly
parents? When anyone says that, he 's going to be
very sneaky and a sinner and must endure the evil that
destroys children. Can you say if you send these
instructions to your writing or to some scripture? Do
they themselves want to die like that to the people
who don't believe in religion?
The cow, the goat, the buffalo which continued to be
milched for a long time, kept for drinking sweet,
nutritious milk, and are cut and eaten as soon as the
milching was closed. The goat, which was really fed
healthy with love, kept as a baby with affection, on
the day of the Eid with a garland, and was killed , Aha!
So grateful is that?
Non-scientific Non-vegetarianism.

The science of carnivores and what you write about--

---
"Meat provides calories, weights, carbohydrates,
nutrients, vitamins .... but nutrition extracted from
plant proteins can not include livestock proteins that
human beings require. For a healthy society, the
nutritional value is to provide a sufficient amount of
meat for human diets." Humans and animals will not
allow use of factors such as vegetables that are
necessary.
Your letter on the subject of grace
'Vegetation needs mercy more than animals ,
particularly though plants are coerced into moving.
You do feel emotions and sorrow. And the freedom of
man does not depend on everything in the universe,
until recognition of this mentality of grace justice.
They have little in common with non-vegetarians in
plants.

Analysis-This is your argument that people and

animals can not consume the elements directly from
the earth, such as the plants, but that the article
should increase its content and who is a vegetarian
suggests that we can not take food directly from the
land , water or air as plants. You just wrote to your
readers to show your scientific knowhow to attract a
limited number of people. It is superfluous and
meaningless. A lot of other things have been
published in vain, such as the versatility of leather, silk
industry, flesh plants, etc. As far as protein is
concerned, in the past context, I have already
mentioned that several times more botanical proteins
must be lost in order to acquire meat protein. And
why do such stupidity? You continue to suggest that
meat-protein in human diet is scientifically important
and I would like to know when and which scientists
continue studied around the world and have
concluded that meat-protein is better than protein
obtained from vegetation. Could we not take milk,
curd and buttermilk as bioproteins if we are talking
about nano-proteins? Milk being the first food, and
natural food is the best food for humans. Is sprouting
seeds, cereals etc less effective than meat protein .
The above division of proteins, i.e., meat-protein
dominance, and vegetable protein inferiority, is
scientifically and ineffectively defined by renowned
medical scientist Samson Wright. He argued that
animal muscles are formed from grass, which means
the high amount of protein is produced from grass.
What then has been the ill effect of botanical protein
on humans? The quality of the protein, its absorption
and acidification, depends on the amino acid. The
sooner the protein is digested and used by the body,
the higher the protein quality. Milk protein, curd, soya
milk , curd, peanuts, nuts are digested and absorbed
more quickly than meat protein. Ripe meat does not
contain vitamins B-1 and B-2 and sprouts contain
ample amounts of B-12, B-1, B-2, B-3A and many
enzymes. Nevertheless, either the taste of meat itself
is nice or the confusion of the community produces a
cruel feeling of meat. Sir. Chew a little raw meat or live
animals like dogs , cats, and eat it, if you wish, so enjoy
it. I assume that everybody is disgusted with non -
vegans naturally, so fried and grilled, and eaten spicy
with oil, it is covered by the seller of meat, though
fruit, milk and nuts, salads, flowers and grains are not
despised. Will you eat them whole too. The best
method of whole food is grain germination. Food
grains must be fried, consumed and roasted but even
raw and natural health care products can be
consumed.
Is there a worldwide doctor who is able to treat
diseases by feeding raw meat? When you talk about
the food's nutrition, there's so much protein in cheap
moong, groundnut, gram, and urad that there's no in
costly meat. You do have unhealthy substances such
as uric acid, which cause many diseases, to eat in
addition to meat protein. Although the poisons are
not found in wheat, nuts, milk and butter. Such toxins
from non-vegetarians, causing diseases of the skin,
poor digestive capacity, constipation etc., are not
exempt from the urinary college. There are also some
scientific evidence to investigate your diet and non-
vegetarian claims.

1. It's Dr. A. Harvard Medical School Watchman, Dr.

DS Result of years of research done by Vansteen-
Carnivores urine is often acidic, because acidity is
produced from meat, therefore alkaline bone salts
begin to dissolve and bones become weak to keep the
body's pH indifferent.
2. Carnivorous causes heart disease , high blood
pressure, thrombosis, paralysis, kidney and
gallstones, liver disease, etc.
3. VP of Georgia School of Medicine Syden Streaker,
A.P. According to Briggs and NMDay Bougger, eggs
cause depression, heart pressure, anesthesia, ecstasy,
nausea, weightlessness, fatigue, tragedy, hemoglobin
deficiency, etc. In 18 months of study by the Florida
Department of Agriculture, 30% of DDT was present
in poultry, according to three Wisconsin based
researchers, poultry are more likely to cause cancer.
There's a toxin here.
4. Rot is produced in the stomach because of the very
low carbon dioxide and calcium in eggs.
5. The risk of gastric cancer , obesity and cholesterol
rises in carnivores are, according to Dr Rainer Frantzel
Bedum from the German Cancer Research Center
Hiddleberg and his colleagues.
6. Diarrhoea, hemorrhoids, hernia, appendicitis,
uterine ovarian, abdominal, intestinal cancer is more
likely because of meat breakdown.
7. The risk of cancer increases greatly from carnivors,
says Takeshi Hirayama, director of the National
Institute of Japan.
8. 160 types of diseases are spread by carnivores,
according to the World Health Organization.
Carnivores raise the risk of heart attacks according to
Nobel laureates Dr. Brown and Goldstein.
9. Meat, according to the renowned German natural
healer Louis Küne, is an unnatural and curative food.
10. With the growth of carnivores, cancer- pain
surges exorbitently -Dr. William Robbut, Dr.
Sargemsier-grows exponentially.
11. The patients of dental disease pyria increase from
non-vegetarian - Mr. Arthur Underwood, Dr. Mr.
Thomas J. Rogan.
12. Meat increases cancer - Dr. Russell.
13. Some people may consume meat without harm of
any sort, but it is inevitable that sooner or later the
consequence of such inhumane food will be known.
After being infected, the liver and kidneys will
abandon their function and cause diseases such as
caries, cancer and arthritis. My s Brown (Vegetarian
Diet and for Region).
14. I have significantly decreased the volume of meat
eaten, as a consequence of which fatigue, emotional
weakness and autoimmune problems, which I have
been experiencing for many years, have gone away-
Dr. Parkes.
15. In meat 143 chemicals were detected, 47 of which
were cancer causes, according to General Accounting
of the United States study.
16. The respected US health organisation's World
Watch estimates that meat eaters are more
vulnerable to heart attacks, diabetes, bowel cancer
and other deadly diseases.

System of non-vegetarian and environmental

NGO and environmental systems

Professor Madan Mohan Bajaj and his fellow

scientists have written a number of important texts,
the famous Indian psychic who played a leading role
in vegetarianity. In his important research, he has
demonstrated that eating meat and fish spreads a
great many kinds of diseases in this world and is also
responsible for severe storms, cyclones, etc. He spoke
about the Einstein Pain Wave and explained the
impact of violence on waves not only by these sources
and diseases but also by the génes of violent people,
which affect the planet, the solar system and galaxies
itself and the whole universe. It was called Biso
Cosmology. These waves were based on BIS Energy,
BIS Field, Bisobiochemistry, Bisochemistry, Biso-
dynamics, Bisogeometry, Bisogynacology,
Bisohematology, Bisomathematics, Bisoneurology,
Bisoocene-graphy, Bisooncology, Bisophysics,
Bisophysics, Bisophysics, Bisotopology, etc., many
sciences have been developed and proved the
consumption of carnivores, fish, wines, eggs, etc
harmful to the universe. Mr. Farrukh, why are you
falling asleep? Say Farrukh Khan, what further
scientific proof is needed? You could recall that a few
days ago in Europe there was an illness called Mad
Cow that killed cow sinners. The disease spread by
consuming the meat of the cows that had the disease.
This disease is spread by feeding meat to cattle and
cows have begun to die. Millions of cows were alive
burned by male vampires as the disease spread to
humans. This issue arose when a vegetarian cow was
fed beef. Isn't unhealthy food meat going to transmit
diseases for vegetarian humans? In 1997, the disease
known as bird flu spread due to eating
of chicken, meat and eggs in Hong Kong, causing the
death of 1.2 million birds. Even after chicken flu
disease has taught the carnivores a lesson in many
countries, those who advocate carnivores have pity.
Did you ever hear that milk, fruit, herb, bread spread
this infection, which has caused milk, fruit, herb,
bread to stop eating? I ask Farukhji, can they give up
vegetarianism, those who are proud to call
themselves non-vegetarians? Can they give up bread,
rice, lens, herbs? Who is in the world a non-vegetarian
who can live healthily by living his whole life on a meat
egg? All vegetarians, however, live free of meat eggs.
Many meat eaters often get safe through the use of
pure vegetarian satvic food without medicines. Can a
world doctor say to treat any disease with non-
vegetarian foods only? When the vegetarian
movement spreads through the entire science
community. Big-2 carnivores that transform their
bellies into a cemetery or land reject meat and eggs,
where you are ineffective in attempting to locate
evidence in the carnivore kept in Quran's
stereotyping. Your statement is-

'There is always an organism in the ecosystem which

can not travel and which needs the utmost goodness
(when vegan compassion has been taken up).'

Review-First of all, I'm going to suggest that if you

decide to consume just those who can move, then I'm
going to say that instead of feeding poor dumb, deaf-
ignorant People can get clever, godly and rational so
what's to tell? Say yes, is that going to be correct? The
more well-being a person creates, the more guilt it
requires to destroy it. It is also unclear whether or not
there is a soul in the forest. The points on both sides
are discussed. The re-emergence of the spirit is firmly
assisted. While the soul is in the trees, it is in Deep
Slumber condition now, and it does not make it
anxious or depressed. Scientific experiments show
that cutting them, etc., does not have a clear
experience of happiness and sorrow as us. Someone's
claiming it's not a offense to harm a sleeping human
or an unconscious individual,so, Is it right to observe?
She alone does not feel sorrow in a moment, the
reason is that this emotional happiness or failure is
only damaged once the needle has been pierced
because if not healed, severe damage may occur and
will not still remain in this sort of state. It was not and
will still be, and it can't equate the dormitory with the
blight of trees. This is a natural and irreversible
condition of plants. On the other side, proposals for
vegetarianism have been developed by our
anatomical Father- The God. This finding is
acknowledged by major 2 scientists. In this case, you
have a valid point, but if taken literally, it is deceptive,
too.

The discrepancy between non-vegetarians and

vegetarians

Your declaration is-

Some claim that God has given carnivores teeth and
paws, which is evidence of being hunters, but not
human beings. This kind of speaker may not believe
that God gave a person no teeth or clutches to break
and carry, but that he gave him the knowledge with
which he might use his strongest arms. God gave the
bovine thick skin and great skin to avoid cold, and
then he gave the human being wisdom through which
he can prepare for himself the best shawl and cloth.
When the person was seeing fur and hair on the
animal body, the effect was that man was not allowed
to wear woolen clothing. Clearly, such an proposal is
absurd.

Review-Your statement is definitely beautiful and

successful, but don't believe vegetarians have only
one panacea. We have several other reasons for
weaponry and firearms, which are not subject to
regulation to prevent (responding) carnivores.

1. First of all, there is no solution to the claims, the

science and the economic truth.
2. Let's do the job of the paw, so what would the
dentures that are separate from carnivores and
vegetarians do?
Teeth belong to three categories-biting, grabbing or
pulling, and scraping or chewing. In carnivores, the
teeth that hold them are very sharp and sharp, and we
don't have them. The jaws of carnivores will not
switch side-by - side in order to not grind but to chew
their food as our molars work.
3. The stomach of carnivorous species is nearly
circular, and the intestines measure three to five
times the length of the mouth to the tail, while our
intestines measure ten to twelve times the body as a
whole and around 24 times the last vertebrae from
the head to the spine. Grass feeding animals, on the
other side, has between 20 to 28 times. You believe
our intestines are more like vegetarian animals than
non-vegetarians. Now your carnivorous intelligence
isn't going to make the intestines smaller? The
abdomen can not be added up.
A kid who has learned little about slaughter, even
though he consumes beef, will not be deceived by
gazing at some large, new goat or bull, whereas the
carnivorous beast would be frightened.
5. For vegetarians, digestion starts from the mouth,
while non-vegetarian digestion begins from the
stomach.
6. Vegetarian saliva produces the alkaline enzyme tilin
saliva amylase, which digests starch, whereas non-
vegetarian saliva is acidic.
7. Carnivores consume bone along with meat, but
humans can not consume bones.
8. Vegetarian newborns can not be kept safe and
stable by non-vegetarians. Milk also declines in
carnivorous animals and in mothers.
9. Carnivores see clearly even at night. Their eyes are
luminous and round, while the vegetarian does not
have such eyes.
10. Vegetarians often drink water with lipstick, while
non-vegetarians drink water from the tongue.
11. Through decorating the houses with roses, plants,
berries, bouquets, the human mind is delighted,
whereas the grossest carnivores do not want to
decorate their house doors, furniture with meat,
cloth, gore, bones, etc. This shows that humans have
a deep dislike for such things.
12. 12. When they see the carnivorous animals, their
devout animals start yelling and screaming, just as
birds, squirrels, etc., run away screaming and
shrieking while they see the cat, while Farooq sighs!
Finding you in a safe place, goats, ducks, pigs,
donkeys, buffalo can't run backwards, so they won't
start crying in panic.
Sir Would you not grasp these twelve variations and
the similarities above? The essence or Deity who
wants to create animals for our food so Deity will be
the guy or the order of Hazrat Muhammad, not the
founder of the Divine creation, rearing and Salvation.
And if God approved this, why doesn't God like
carnivores even render our anatomy? You
're discussing—-

'He has fixed the world 's nutritional issues in the

same manner as we get nutritional from one another,
whether the issue is food from the plants or the feed
of the beast. Life depends on one another. The cat
catches the mouse, the lion catches the goat, the cow
and the wolf, the shark catches the great trout.
Review – Blessed, Farukh Sahib has taken influence
from fish, eagle, horse, cat through his intellect 's
bankruptcy. The carnivorous ecosystem was often
debated with wildlife. God has set the supply of
everyone of this universe, and He has formed His body
even like He has provided food for Him. Why can't
you, besides carnivorous animals, learn from animals
the eat grass, animals and fruits-fed monkeys ... when
God constructs our anatomy like them? If you suggest
that after learning from both, it's okay to become a
hybrid by consuming vegetation and meat-eggs, then
tell me how to hybridize this anatomy and function?
Brother! Brother! Now dream about it! Persistence
isn't correct Don't make evil, mean people your boss.
How can it be important to provide examples of
carnivorous flora, bacteria and viruses? Somewhere,
by providing an indication of the depletion of mass
from the strength of the Light, we would like to
reassure readers of common sense that you are quite
competent about science. These things even ordinary
students know. By addressing such topics, I find it
needless to raise the size of the post. Your argument
on the unislamic in non-vegetarian meat is-
'Non-vegetarian meat is often deemed forbidden on
religious grounds. The meat produces creatures in
nature (the term 'animalism'), producing predators
and brutality. It obviously detrimental to humanity.
"These statements should have been written together
here - wildness and shamelessness are obviously
against morality. In fact, you are saying, 'Meat has an
impact even on man's existence.'

Take into account — You have also agreed to the truth

that carnivore beings are wild, self deprecating, and
merciless. Such diseases may also occur to human
beings by consuming their foods, so consuming their
foods is forbidden. Sir, I 'd like to ask you, How can a
non-vegetarian individual consume these animals and
be wise, respectful and compassionate, when he
consumes goats, pigs, horseback, etc., shears, pets,
wolves etc., and wild and cheeky, be merciless, then
question arises why is he eating them? Then horses,
goats, ovine, horse, donkeys and pigs are better than
carnivore people because by not consuming meat,
they will guard against the illnesses described above
and remain stuck. Yes, the pig eats meat sometimes,
so you could say something. Note, I do not fault non-
vegetarians for this, but only your reasoning. I just
disclosed your proposal, but I surely endorse it.

Fleece and kindness

You are penning

The philosophy of death always goes on with
existence in this (the whole) development. In addition
to health, disease and pain are run by laws. Man is in
the centre of the world 's work. When life is a symbol
of God's grace, so compassion is operating even
through death. Death unlocks the gate of true life

It was astonishing to say that the individual who gets

death because of disease, no one then says God 's
behavior with creatures is merciless, he did not keep
animals free of death and the person who receives the
flesh is allowed to do so and then he is assaulted.
When it's complicated to bit, it brings more difficulty
to death as normal (in the same sense, a lot of
unregulated writing was attempted to demonstrate
the insights).

Analysis-Joy, grief, existence and death go hand-in -

hand, even if God destroys anyone he offers him
heaven. He also has the freedom to kill for this
purpose. He brings joy, grief and death, according to
the command, yet you have learnt to feed the sheep,
ducks, pigs, etc, to feed your belly and making it a
crematory of the dead bodies. Do you know how to
get a dead animal raised? God is a holy,
benefactor,just and gracious, gives all beings
happiness, sorrow and life by order, Is it? If not, how
about killing? Why did you suit God? How do you
match God? It produces, nurtures, preserves and kills,
but by destroying livestock it damages itself.
Farukkhji's Lucky! I wonder if God isn't killing a man,
does that hurt? If so, sir, good! Show them the path of
real life after the killing of your children, parents and
family, offering them your compassion. Mr. Farrukh
You are very kind (?), who is running on poor weak
animal birds' necks silent animals, snuffing them and
eating them up, mixing them with God's wondrous
death. We offer the blessing of the true world by
granting liberation from this fake existence and
encouraging Us to obey the necessary laws of Heaven.
But Farukhji Mohammad! How rude are you to your
family and culture, who even after seeing them
cautious, weak, sad, do not taste the sweet offers of
men. The poor suffer the sorrow of natural death. The
wretched man of Christ dies from murdering others.
Yet Allah, who has the courage to destroy these men,
has little mercy for you. You have taken it upon
yourself to slaughter animals and birds, but the work
of destroying humans is rested on the shoulder
of poor Lord. Where do you find philanthropists,
religious, generous like you, contractors who after
their showering grace have become contractors for
bringing all the animals into heaven except for their
own sake is acceptable? You have found your relatives
dead at the mercy of Sin and Death, and are able to
suffer the same suffering yourself, through
persecuting them through sickness, old age, etc. Then
wouldn't you even want yourself like a goat to
sacrifice? The Logicians are blessed! This strange and
fake smartness can cause you just think of poultry,
eggs. Sir The Quran tells elderly men, children and
orphans to love. Among human beings you grow to
respect mothers, but you think of loving goats and
hens while avoiding them. You define death as one of
God's great signals. That wonderful symbol is being
robbed of you by Mourning. The weed is jumping in
the hip. Once he gets sick, he goes to the hospital and
groans after he hands the fire, but is not ready to cut
his throat to live the Real you, while the animals have
mercy on the fried and consumed. Woe to the
carnivores who say that they are considered scholars
such as you. Don't be as slave to electrical signals as
much. Should not seek to hide a brilliant plaque with
knowledge with theological madness, worship the
divine. Your declaration is-

'For himself Death has many spiritual benefits. There's

plenty about self-awareness of any unhealthy species
and object and bug in the universe-which is a
reluctance to surrender their creatures to the
grandeur of God.

Review- It is real that cruel animals should be

prosecuted for themselves and for the public, but
other creatures like us have the freedom to exist.
That's just a reality. The king also has the right of
decorum to kill harmful predatory animals. It's a
particular form of gross misdeed to please the ego by
sacrificing poor and vulnerable creatures. Then I ask
that you have not produced a goat, so what right do
you have to sacrifice it? You believe that Allah should
present his beloved thing. So do you love the goat
with your own body or your family? You believe the
beloved thing ought to be presented to Allah, then I
ask that you have not produced a goat, and then
what right have you to make the offering? So do you
love the goat more than your own body or the
members of your family? If not, why don't you or
them sacrifice it? You worship and animals splash and
die, while also they are born of the same God, are
children, what gross misdeeds they do? If God wants
the same food for meat and blood, and likewise for
any Hindu God Then God will kill everybody, even if he
doesn't fill his belly? He'll kill himself if deity or God is
hungry, why has this work assigned to you? Then the
Quran says, too.

'The caretaker doesn't touch God either through meat

or blood, rather it hits him.'

Now tell me, you 're destroying God's creatures or

fulfilling your desire? Hey, sir! Hey! Hey mister! If you
would like to honor Allah, escape evil; seek to be
compassionate to God's children. Treat their sadness
as your grief. As brother, respect humankind. If you
want only Electric Signals of the minds to be satisfied,
you can eat with love the most excellent food made
of divine milk, melted butter, fruits, butter, nuts,
grains etc.
Surprisingly, when you explain bits-2 perforating
the animals as religion, you offer indications of
compassion towards animals. This dual character is
not a positive idea. According to you, the lady who is
sick with sympathy on the dog earned redemption,
and the altruistic men demonstrate the path to
salvation with the killing of the cow. The cow is equal
for the saving of the dog and the killing of the cow,
therefore the milk of bitch should be drunk rather
than the cow's, because its cradle will provide also
salvation and we will also getting to drink lovely
sweet milk, along with it will also take care of the
house. Friend! Friend! It would be easier to assume
that God just pleases creatures with sympathy. Your
statement is:

"A sharp knife, which is the least hassle, to pierce (for

animal slaughter)."
I learn Hindu butchers surprisingly slaughter livestock
and Muslims term it halal by deliberate slitting. You
don't even like to eat the animal flesh murdered by
the blow, so where do you get ideas then? Butchers
are good, I don't claim, and Muslims are evil. The
more tortured and killed, the crueler and sinner they
are. They 're both sinners. Your declaration is-

"Humans and not animals are the key objective of

creating this wood. This universe is totally dark if a
human is isolated from this planet. Without men, all
beauty, all decoration and even all the furnishings
have no sense. There is the existence of a human
person, in whom the spirit with nature and intent
lingers in all the creation, There is abomination that
doesn't go unnoticed, all things of the world are
created for humans, to call the name unfair God
(grace). There is an atrocity, that will not go ignored.
This is an unfaithful atrocity, to pronounce God's
(grace) name wrong, a major ego. Carnivore 's
resistance is a negation to God's divine love. For the
benefit of human beings Nature has the ability to
make the best of the creatures he has created.

Analysis- Man is the greatest species in the universe.

That is real. This formation belongs primarily to men.
The Vedas endorse it, too-" Tubhyam bhuvanani
tasthire tubhyamsarshani sindhava : Rigveda - three
World just live for you. Only flow rivers for you. Things
won't be unfair if a man's name is called the king of all
creatures, but is the king insinuating to those who kill
and eat people? Is it a father's responsibility to kill a
baby? No, absolutely not. No. The king and father
have the responsibility to watch and defend their
children and subjects. Everyone has both the right to
pleasure and to karma. It needs to be raised on the
basis of personal experiences as other beings. Where
there is no realization or necessity of right,
responsibility or dedication. Such minutiae are like a
spirit cage. Before Divine Karma finds a certain
equilibrium, one will remain in the same yoni(84 lacs
forms). M an is certainly moving through the
Yoni(form)once more.Who would be a person's
strength or privilege to freed Mankind from prison of
Samsara and return to the Yoni(Form)? Animals are
certainly meant for human use. Several were
produced for food, others for fur, livestock, and some
for leather of the natural dead, but only tigers,
leopards, wolves, cats were created to consume meat
by attacking them. Wild animals also assist humans
implicitly by helping to preserve the ecosystem, some
of which are often dangerous. They can even be used
to execute sinners, they may even be slaughtered, not
for milk, in an unintended event in self-defense. They
can kill not only their own animals, but also the
murderers who kill them, but they are not cuisine. If
you believe God said in the Quran that animals were
created to be consumed as meat, why has God then
forgotten to build up such a body? God made a grave
error till now. You ought to say to God when you pray,
"Oh GOD! You made animals for our nourishment,
but made us to like goats, cows and monkeys, who
don't have organs like carnivores. Ah, Heaven
overlooked! Now fix the mistake or claim I didn't build
the Quran, it's Mohammad's imagination. So where is
the Quran digging the text claiming itself to be the
Word of God, if there is no harmony between the
Koran and creation? The second statement is also not
appropriate and can not be debated here; however
when you believe in the Quran, existence of Allah,
then say Him, O God! heavens! Because of the
misfortune, Renowned scientists alert carnivores.
Question, too, why have you created the fat pig? It's
all for sawdust scrubbing, so why did the
this fat's stock fill faster than others? Non-vegetarian
meat was also tempting, but God termed it
Unislamic too. Brother! Brother. Brother, Keep in
mind that not everything of God is to feed. Not just of
human advantage, every being has a specific purpose,
too. Say yes! Tell yeah! Only God made poison, and
after swallowing it he expected us to die? Having
rendered filthy birds, kites, bees, mosquitoes,
gubbies, everybody is meant to be eaten? Seek to
grasp science's complexities and faiths' mysteries.
Consider God 's magnificent and wise creation. Don't
frighten yourself about getting being a boss. Man's
privilege to obey God's commands is to
accommodate & obey him to not become the same .
You equate goat scratching, not brazenness, with the
surgeon's operation! The veterinarian rips the infant
to free it from the illness, not mording and feeding,
while carnivores mercilessly slaughter creatures like
cruel thieves to fill their stomachs. Non-vegetarians
should have learned the benefit of creating these
distinctions. Only weak animals have been noticed
when you have to use such a cannabis. You will know
what is the definition of mercy and cruelty and how is
the distinction between the two? I suggest you- do
this surgery for yourself and your family?

Ancient Past of Carnivores

Your argument is —
‘History has proven that man uses meat as fuel.
People used to eat meat in India during the Vedic
period. The hunting of animals by the command of the
arrow was prevalent. This is illustrated by the
portrayal of Tulsidasji, which encourages
Ramachandraji to chase deer and to go out to kill elk.
Subsequently, King Dasaratha launched the arrows at
Shravanakumar though mistakenly in the
disillusionment of Deer, sourcing was unquestionably
real & authentic.

Examination: On what basis do we look at meat

consumption? Scientific experiments have also taken
place. You claim God gave man wisdom to make
weapons for consuming animals alone. I asked, did
they even carry them a sword or not when God had
delivered up your Baba Adam and Eve? Has God
prohibited them to eat the fruit of a particular tree?
This does not mean that other fruits were not
forbidden. This illustrates how fertile and non
carnivorous Adam and Eve were. God didn't say they
shouldn't eat pigs, but cock etc. It's the marvel of the
language of Mohammed. Now, you know the
forbidden fruit of your god or Satan. Our aim is for a
man to be good. It started to drink food, milk etc.
later, but not much later. Yeah, the primary and
compulsory foods is mother's milk. Oh, Lord Manu,
humanity's first Dharmapedeshta (after God) has not
stated about one but eight carnivore sinners.

"Anumanta Vishasita Nihanta Kriya Krivriya.

Sanskara Chopharta f Khadakashcheti Mhataka:
"(Manusmriti 5.51)

In other words, these eight gross sinners are those

who let meat eat, cut meat from beef, kill, buy and sell
meats, cook, serve and consume. How do meat-eaters
consider their domain when human history begins
with the Vedas and Manu teachings? Yeah, mlechah,
asuras, ghosts, etc. people have been misled by slowly
stroking them towards Carnivores. The Aryans (higher
human beings) kept battling with these carnivores. In
the case of Shri Ram you have tried to demonstrate
the historicity and logic of meat consumption. In this
sense, Valmiki Ramayana should be taken seriously.
As Maricha came out to Sitaji as a golden Doe she
immediately showed him to Sriramji and Lakshmanji
. Laxmanji having seen this, Uttered—

"Eham Manye Maricham Raksamas Mrigam"

Anen Nihata Ram Rajan: Kamarupina. "
(Aranya Kaand 34.5,6)
Which is, I believe this creature came as an antelope.
The devil killed many kings. That willing demon, Sitaji
called on him not to be executed, but to be caught
alive. There was no need for an arrow if we wanted to
assume that it should be caught alive? In this situation
, I think it is not feasible to catch the antelope with
running hands but can be caught with mohanastra
etc. He took Bow & Arrow for that purpose. The
Kshatriya should not be disarmed, unarmed, either.
Then he was afraid Deer as the Maricha, then the
armed force was obligatory. There is, however,
discussion in Valmiki Ramayana of only eliminating
him if he can't keep him alive and he has said that Sita
ji wanted to hold his skin up. I wonder that they
should not create beds with trees, herbs, and roses at
position because there was love with the seat and skin
bed. Have they noticed no lovely animals in the
forest? And if you didn't find it so stunning, a number
of lovely ponies, lions, leopards etc. have found lovely
skinned animals in the area. Why don't you attack
anyone because of your skin? In several areas Sriramji
has instructed Laxmanji to create beds with vine, grass
and wood. Why not an animal commanded to
be destroyed and carried leather? This might render
the beds and postures relaxing. He told Laxmanji
when Shri Ramji determined to follow the deer—-

‘‘यदि वायं यथा यन्ां भवेद् विसि लक्ष््ण।

्ायैषा राक्षिस्येति कर्Ÿााव्योऽस्य वधो ्या।।
एिेन दि नश
ृ ंिेन ्ारीचेना कृिात््ना।
वने ववचरिा पूवं दिंसििा ्ुतनपुंगवााः।’’
(अरण्य काण्ड 34.38,39

O Lakshman, that's it! If you suggest to me, it is my

duty to destroy because this is not the antelope, if this
is a supernatural Maya. Because the sages were
murdered by this wicked. From this it is evident that
Shriramji considered the animal as Marich rather than
the golden deer. We should be mindful that he came
only to be served by Lakshmanji. He plan huts, tents,
wood, tubers, trees, fruit anywhere. Therefore,
couldn't Laxmanji do this job, if the animal were to be
trapped or killed? Some who could ferociously battle
great warriors were unable to kill or catch this deer?
And why did Shri Ramji go to the specific mission
himself and nominate Lakshmanji to defend Sitaji
there? Why wasn't Anuj Laxmanji
always assignned this task? Shriramji grasped the
gravity of the case from this perspective. He didn't
want to bother Laxmanji, realizing Marich 's strength
and celeste, . Under extreme situations he had
confidence under his masculinity. This was also when
Khar and Dushan invaded with a 14,000-strong force.
Through not asking Laxmanji to fight, Shriramji
himself waged the war and appointed Lakshmanji to
defend Sitah. The same situation has also been
created here. After having strongly contemplated all
this, it has been shown that Shriramji did not go
on chasing & hunting, but has been to a devastating
war knowing him to be a maricha. Looking at the
other Ramayana chapters, we shall note that there
was no bloodshed at the period except the evil,
oppressive battle. Shri Ramji taught the entire of
politics when Mahatma Bharatji approached Sri Ramji
in Chitrakoot and as soon as he saw him. It has a point
in which Ayodhya was referred to as
'HinsaBhiribhivarjitah' (Ayo. 100th Canto, Verse 44).

It indicates that Ayodhya was completely free of

brutality, so how can one be hunted? Although
praying to Sri Ramji, Maharaja Dasarathaji urged him
to keep away from the 18 addictions, as Shri Ram was
about to be crowned, the 18 men addictions
attached to (LUST)kamaas and the raging, of whom
the hunting was reported to be the first downfall for
rulers. So, how can Sriramji and Dasarathaji abuse be
demonstrated? When somebody questions it, how
should he prohibit it by preaching when Sriramji did
not play hunting? The answer can only be found in
Dashrathji's own words. They say—-

‘‘का्िस्वं प्रकृत्यैव तनणीिो गुणवातनति।

गण
ु वत्यवप िु स्नेिाि ् पत्र
ु वक्ष्यास् िे दिि् ्।।’’
(अयो. कां. िगग 3.41)

That is, even if you are decent sort and this is all about
you & your choices, but even after you are
affectionately virtuous I tell you things of concernSo it
is evident that, given no addiction listed above in Shri
Ram, the obligation to predicate as a parent was
stated to be. If you prove the argument of hunting by
taking refuge from Shravanacumar 's past, you first
inquire for Shravan to be killed in deer deception, it
becomes obvious that you haven't read both
Ramayana and Ramcharitmana, then Deer is not
named in lieu of elephants. In Ramcharitmana, this
tale is just descriptive, and in Ramayana, Valmiki is
comprehensive. The term 'VyayamaSankalpa' is given
to Dasarathaji. He appeared not to go for meat, but to
exercise or to bend down to the banks of the Saryu
River for archery. You wrote-

तनपाने ्दिशं राजौ गिं वाभ्यागिं ्ग

ृ ् ्।
अनयद् वा श्वापिं ककचचज्जजघांिुरज्जिेज्नियाः।।
(अयो.का. िगग 63.21)

These four were determined in this scenario, Mahish,

Gaja, Mrig and Shwapada. Mahish, Gaja, antelopes (if
a deer is considered) are non-violent in the general
context. While the tiger means a violent animal, its
mutual alliance does not exist. While it is a violent
animal. All four must be viewed as aggressive for this
cause. WMahish – The Wild buffalo should still be
protected due to it's nuisance & the wild elephant is
also a pest & Untamed but it should not be
acceptable for the deer to presume the importance of
the lion. It was shown that Dasharathaji had to
conceive about executing such rude and aggressive
beasts, but he felt that he was naming himself
Ajindendriya, i.e. that karma was considered as a sin,
and kings' greatest virtues wasn't allowing him,
for that he rejected That sacrilege. It indicates that at
the time poaching was not widespread, but was
deemed evil. Designed for archery without shooting
anyone. The King granted the right to kill such unruly
and violent animals that caused the people in general
a crisis. Dasharathaji thought of fighting or even killing
without uproar, and thus he proclaimed himself to be
a demerit.

Both Ramayana and Mahabharata, I believe there is a

summary of the shooting. I want to claim
unequivocally that the medieval meatballs have all
these episodes planned. -My explanation is that Shri
Ramji or the Kshatriyas and others were known as
righteous, Veda - Seers or non-violent, how would
they do evil work against Vedas? Whilst Shri Ram Ji is
named, on the one side, 'Rakshita Jeevlokasya,' how
can he destroy creatures? Those who explain Lord
Manu 's order to cover up Shri Ram Bali's slaughter at
the time, claiming that he has a specific integrity, are
the ones who have first and foremost to perpetrate
the cruelty and gross sin of Lord Manu 's Huntings.
Even after you were told, how could you hunt? If so,
what is 'Ramodvirnabhashatte' going to happen? This
is, Shriramji was renowned for following what he
meant. Things are not shifting regularly.This is a
formidable sin itself to condemn the person such
as Great lord Rama for executing the Hunts That is
why abuse and the rascals' mismanagement are
apparent in our Scriptures. Some aristocratic figures
now prescribe Kshatriyas for meat carnivores, but
they even think Vedic Sanatan Kshatradharma is
Incomplete, unjust and have negative qualms about
that. The first king of the universe was Lord Manuji
that we spoke about, and Lord Shri Ram was a
prominent & noteworthy Kshatriya ..Then Question
arises- Who said that carnivores are suitable for
kshatriyas if the both thought the carnivores were
morally repugnant Who can label him dumb to play
the Kshatriya being Nimrod if Lord Manu finds this as
first flaw for a King? The King of Kshatriya is supposed
to be a Brahmanist, that is to say absolute scholar &
yogi of the Vedas. In Yajurveda 's analysis, Maharishi
Dayanandji Maharaj stated that it was necessary for a
ruler and a judge to be yogi and, in the age of Dwapar,
a prominent world leader, Bhishma Ji referred to
nonviolence as the supreme religion, who will then be
willing to promote Carnivore as Kshatradharmavita?
Yes , of course, because of their cruel nature,
barbarists like demons were always fiery, and
Kshatriyas always fought the war against such
cruelty.. & ferocity.

When anyone wishes to be named a devil and

supports carnivores, I won't be taking sides to become
the wicked Ravan because i would like to draw
guidance from the devil lord, Mahatma Vibhishana.
Yeah, sadly, the medieval Kshatriyas also rendered
such defects and and they can not be seen as proof
to Kshatradharma. Such flaws and crimes like opium,
Gambling, sexual violence etc. have destructed the
Indian rulers.

Non-vegetarian Food and Vedic beliefs

You've been publishing

'Non-vegetarians' is no hatred in Hinduism.' You
quoted for this the Hindi sense in certain manusmrit
shlokas, which explained Shraddha, animal sacrifice
and traditional carnivores..
Review- I assert that all the verses you have quoted in
Manusmriti are only readily accessible in the above
sense, but that these projections have been made by
anti-religious sinners. 1471 shlokas are projectile and
1214 initial from the existing 2685 shlockas in
Manusmriti. To be able to better understand this, Dr
Surendrakumarji's Manusmriti commentary should
be read openly, unbiasedly and unjustly, published by
Arsh Sahitya Prachar Trust in 427 Gali Khari Baoli,
Delhi-6 . The new light will be fetched and Lord Manu
religion will begin to shine solely & excusively, I truly
believe. Look! Look! Look! Manuji says-

‘वजगयेन्ध्
ु ांिं च’ (्न.ु 6.14)
अथागि ् ्धु = It is prohibited to use alcoholic
substances and meat.

‘ना कृत्वा प्राणणनां दिंिा ्ांि्ुत्पद्यिे क्वचचि ्।

न च प्राणणवधाः स्वग्र्यस्िस््ान्ांिं वववजगयेि ्।।’ (्न.ु
5.48)
‘यो बनधन वधक्लेशान ् प्राणणनां न चचकीषगति।
ि िवगस्य दििप्रेपिुाः िुख्त्यनि ्श्नुि।े ।’ (्नु. 5.46)
‘ि्ुत्पवि च ्ांिस्य वधबनधौ च िे दिना् ्।
प्रि्ीक्ष्य तनविेि िवग्ांिस्य भक्षणाि ्।।’ (्नु. 5.49)

That is to say , anyone who does not want to bind, kill

and torment creatures, enjoys the greatest happiness
over all life. Flesh is rarely accomplished without the
brutality of the beasts and destroying the beasts is not
fun. Fleece will not, nevertheless, be eaten.
Witnessing the agony of slaughter and fastening the
flesh when it emerges, evade consuming meat of all
sorts. Beyond this, there are Eight sinners who
consume meats, as we have published before. Not
only can can a human unholy with blood in this
chapter in the 123rd section not in any way
can cleanse himself, can a individual like this label
such a benevolent Manu a meat supporter?? Once
You and those who make certain false assertions get
view from a reasonable and unbiased opinion, will
find that is a rascal amy(Fool’s heaven).

Your statement is-

Rigveda says: "I 'd prepare for you a good Bull and pin
the Somaras (Rigveda 10.29.2) as I assault the
enemies against the Lord with My Companions. Rig
Veda 10.28.3 also mentions drinking somaras and
consuming cooked meat. The Arthavaveda is at
7.6.37-The cow's meat and milk is stronger. This will
not be eaten (in front of guests). Those who subdue
meat and offer it to guests will have the yajna seed.
"The Arthveda is 7.6.40.42"

Check- The domain of the first mantra was not

provided. I would likely want to confirm his views
(R10.28.2). It is not necessary to compose the mantra
only because it does not provide the slogan, though
several commentators from the Veda have universal
remarks. Indra, which means the lord or soul, is the
deity of the chant. Knowledge of his propitious subject
deity is obligatory before knowing the mantra. When
people saw the name 'Taurus' here, the bull was
confused. Actually, "Taurus," the racer, soul and king
of contentment, is depicted here.. This Taurus has
been said to be on the highest and nicest position in
the earth, so it can not be an ox. Then I squander
Somaras, not with this Taurus, but with 'yah Sutasom:
Purbati,' after Taurus. Here are the words 'Yah
sutasomah' for the Taurus, which gave me the
perfection of the Taurus that had prepared Somaras ..
'Taurus' could not then signify ox, because the bull
can't press out the shoulder straps and bring
Soma. Thus, Taurus will be another person or soul.
Here Taurus would indicate the spirit as Som is
meaning worship. If 'Taurus' is sovereign, then Soma
's meaning shifts. 'Taurus' means in the next mantra a
substance that gives pleasure, and Kakadasingi is a
special drug. The Ayurvedic texts of Bhavaprakash
and Rajnighandu, in which various names which mean
bulls are given to this particular medication, confirms
that, otherwise, how is anyone going to call
Kakadasingi a bull?

िाः रोरुवि ् वष
ृ भाः तिग््शङ्
ृ गाः वष्र््न ् िस्थौ वरर्न ्
आ पचृ थव्यााः।
ववश्वेषु एनं वज
ृ नेषु पास् याः ्े कुक्षी िि
ु िो्ाः
पण
ृ ाति।।
(ऋग्वेि 10.28.2)

His sage is Vasukraha. (ब्रह्् वै विुक्राः (ऐ. आ. 1.1.2)),

इिका िात्पयग यि िै कक इिकी उत्पति ब्रह््रूप प्राण
रज्श््यों िे िोिी िै ।
िे विा- इनिाः, छनि- तनचि
ृ ् त्रत्रष्टुप ्

He is a rainbow of many sharp-sounding shrringam

vibrations (Nighantu 1.17). In space, the Sun with
superior volcanoes is exalted by great strength, the
Tigmam Vayranam (Nighantu 2.20). Prana tattva
tracks this Sun through all manner of
forces, energies and defends it. The Sun can only
attain the fullness of the Soma dimension compressed
in its midriff with this Prana tattva. Certain powers
described in several Vedic sciences play also a
function, as well as the force of gravité, nuclear force,
electromagnetic force, etc., as specified by the
modern Solar science. The specific vibrations play the
main role behind all the forces. The fusion of the
numerous nuclei in the central section of the Sun and
the migration to the central portion of these nuclei,
etc. often play a function in specific life rings. My book
"Vedvig-loka" can be read for this rationale.

This is just the (scientific) sense of Adhidaivik, that too

briefly. This may have more metaphysical and semi-
iotic interpretations (temporal practical), we leave
only two definitions here. In reality, DE codification of
Vedas isn't every scholar's work, even when he is
also a serene Sanskrit grammatical scholar. Instead
the Sanskrit language appears to you woefully
clueless. In this situation, the holy text in the Vedas
and Brahmin scriptures was targeted by copying from
here and now. Even those whose translations you
have quoted, don't know Vedartha's alphabet, what
should your story be then? You should seek to read
my essential book Vedvigya-loka but, to comprehend
it, both your Sanskrit grammar and theoretical physics
must be of a minimal standard.

Indra, which also means the king and soul, is the god
of second mantra. It can also be interpreted
scientifically in my aesthetic. The first appeal about
the Atharvaveda 's sources is that an essay copied
renders a joke. The Atharvaveda you have not seen
even, then there are no mantras in the
aforementioned addresses with the interpretation of
those expression. The first slogan address will be
(7.6.37), modified to (7.637). Consider this also to be
an imprint defect, but in Atharva Veda Kand 7, Sukta
6 there are only four mantras and from what came 37,
40-42 mantras you quoted. Your prose is unfair and
deceptive. Someone will read the book first and then
after which publish it. Writing by copying is fraud and
stolen plagiarism, if incorrect, what would be said?
This is the state of affairs. Those mantras are not
visible to anyone in the world. I assume you would
seek to exploit more scriptures after reading my
offensive attempt or try to locate something else in
Atharvavaveda. Let me save your hard work and tell
me where can you put these bogus significances? In
the following posts you will get some ambiguity.

‘‘एिि वा उ स्वािीयो यिाचधगवं क्षीरं वा ्ांिंवा ििे व

नाश्नीयाि ्।’’
(अथवगवेि 9.5.9)

The essence of this mantra has been identified as

"Adhigavam," essence permitted water, and "meat"
meaning the sensitive brain by Shri Kshemkaran Dasji
Trivedi. When you say it's the slogan lift, then beef is
generated directly. Sir When Vedic terms continue to
be specifically translated, you 're not going to have to
return from a lot of trouble. Taurus with four eyes,
three wings, two feathers, seven hands are also
mentioned in the Vedas. Will Taurus be decoded here
directly? I understand that in this ludicrous situation
you would not want to get trapped. I also recommend
that one be patient and take the context into
consideration. In copying, expertise is often
mandatory. See how the term 'Go' has multiple
interpretations in the Vedas, not the universe itself.
Water is also granted sense in the Apte dictionary, so
Shri Trivedi means "Vedic" and is also perceptually &
cognitively favourable.
I now give my point, Farooq Khan, the opportunity to
learn! You won't really get it, you'll have no non-
vegetarian to Interpret it. See my analysis.

My opinion on the matter

In its context, Arya scholar Prof. Vishwanath
Vidyalankar has paneer meaning 'meat' here, while
Pt. Ksmakaranadas Trivedi called Manadasadhak
(thoughtful) as meat. Everyone has given hospitality
to the subject of this mantra and other mantras of
Sukta. The deity of this mantra is a guest and a guest
in Pt Trivedi Ksmakaranadas’s eyes, while Pt.
Satavalekar has been considering it to be a guest
education. Oh, Pt. Satavalekar considered it to be
Sage Brahma. Chanda Pipilica is Madhya Gayatri.
{Brahma = Mano Vai Yajnasya Brahma (Sh.14.6.1.7),
Prajapatirvai Brahma (Go. U.5.8). Atithi: = yo vai
bhavati ya: superioritymashnuate sa vetharbhavati
(A.I.1.1.1). = Pt, man. Satavalekar has considered
Brahma to be his wise man. Chanda Pipilica is the
Madhya Gayatri. {Brahma = Mano Vai Yajnasya
Brahma (Sh.14.6.1.7), Prajapatirvai Brahma (Go.
U.5.8). Atithi: = yo vai bhavati ya:
superioritymashnuate sa vatharbhavati (A.I.1.1.1).
Hastipati: = Guesthiptirvatheerishe (cited from Bra.co.
c. 46.4). Pipilica = Pipilika Pelatergica: (da.3.9). n
Svadu = Praja Svadhu (A.I.1.3.4), Praja Va Svastuah
(JB.2.144), Mithuni Va Svastu (A.I.1.3.4). Kshiram =
Yadatyakshata tat Kshirasya Kshiratvam (JB.2.228).
Manasm = meatam purisham (Sh8.6.2.14),
manasm mann or manasm or manasam siddati va
(v.4.3), manasm saadanam (Sh 8.1.4.5)

My Aadhidevic transcription
एिि ् वा स्वािीयाः)
(Hereby Tasteful:) These guests ie continuous gantry
pran, vyana vibrations and hospitality ie controlling
sutra vamani vibrations are flavoursome ie helping to
generate different substances by making mithras of
different chandishadis. (Yat) which is based on the
subtle speech (pramavya and sutram vayu rashmiyan
(the superabundant and weak or flesh), ie 'Om' Chand
Rashmi, as well as its Purish = complete connective
force {Purisham = Purnam Balam (M.D. Yabha 12.46),
Aandrihi Purisham (Sh. 8.7.3.7), Annam Purisham (Sh.
8.1.4.5) {Purisham = Purnam Balam (M.D. Yabha
12.46), Aandrihi Purisham (Sh. 8.7.3.7), Annam
Purisham (Sh. 8.1.4.5) } continuously flowing through
materials such as Nana Rashmi or atoms etc. The root
of these vibrations of 'Om' is called mansatva, with
alkalinity and absolute viability. The word "flesh" here
indicates that these signs "Om" are nearest to the
mind and that the mind is the biggest inhabited form.
The Om waves continue to fall into the vital matter
and other large substances which sprout over the
clouds of vedic air. (िि ् एव न अश्नीयाि ्) For this
reason, there is no destruction of the process of
formation of various Rashmi or atomic substances etc.
This framework does not destroy the process of
making guest life for mithras before it becomes inert,
but after it becomes inactive, & after the combination
of two particles and the mithun process can be
destroyed or stopped, it should be known.
The effect on creation of this Sacred Text-
Seer’s and Divine Influence-It is suggested by its wise
Brahma that it originates from the Jupiter of the
consciousness and the 'Om.' This Gemini tends to
motivate Chand Rashmi constantly and strongly. Due
to its divine influence, life, spirits and vedic-air
Vibrations(prana) are particularly active and
supplemented by many Radio-active & atomic
orders.

Chandas Effect-Because of its phase being in the

middle of the Gayatri, this verse is continuously
transmitted between the different substances at the
time of happenstance & conjunction, with a peak
wavelength and force. As a result , different
substances continue to gain effulgence and
force between them.

Impact of the Holy Text-When two objects are

combined, there is a peculiar contribution to
spirit(Prana) , mind(vyana) and formular-air
vibrations(vayu rashmiya) between them. Such waves
penetrate the feature of the atmosphere, pollinated
by various vibrations. At the same moment, the slight
'Om' rings over these waves are making their pollen
strenghtening and stronger. This continuously makes
the field between the two particles effective and
unites the two particles.

My Analysis on Metaphysical Science

(एिि ् वा स्वािीयाः)There are healthy food products
(hereby sweet). (यिचधगवं क्षीरं वा)The milk, molten
butter, curds, etc., or (्ांि् ् वा) veges, fruits, etc.,
useful for meditation, spirituality, etc. are all of
Yadadhigavan and Kshiranwa. V (ििे व न अश्नीयाि ्)
Such items can not be consumed before the guest's
meal, that is, during the guest's eating. In this case,
the ex mantra "Ashitatvatiyathavashniyat" = Ashitivati
guesti Ashniyat, ‘‘असशिावत्यतिथावश्नीयाि ्’’ =
असशिावति अतिथौ अश्नीयाि ्। is proven to not be
eaten before the guest. In this pre-apocalyptic
critique, understand this episode.

Term V {्ांि् ्):-The first Arya scientist in this topic,

Pt. Raghunandan Sharma cites from the book "Vedic
sampatti" a range of texts from Ayurveda.
It is published, discussing the fruit of the mango in
Sushrut, that-

अपक्वे चूिफले स्नाय्वज्स्थ्जजानाः

िक्ष्
ू ्त्वाननोपलभ्यनिे पक्वे त्वाऽववभि
ूग ा उपलभ्यनिे।
In other words, the raw fruits of mangoes seem to
have no venous, bone and pith etc. but they are all
discernible when they are ripened.

The follicles, kernel bones, fiber vena and fluid part

marrow have been called the fiber of the kernels in
here. In Bhavaprakash there also has been a similar
description. This has been published----

आम्रास्यानुफले भवज्नि युगपन्ांिाज्स्थ्जजाियो

लक्ष्यनिे न पथ
ृ क् पथ
ृ क् िनुिया पुष्टास्ि एव स्फुटााः।
एवं गभगि्ु˜वे त्ववयवााः िवे भवनत्येकिा लक्ष्यााः
िक्ष्
ू ्िया न िे प्र ्रकटिा्ायाज्नि वद्
ृ चधग्िााः।

This is, because raw mango fruit does not appear to

distinguish skin , bone and marrow, but is only
acknowledged at the period of maturity, also at the
beginning of pregnancy, human organs are not
identified.

It is known from all these evidences that blood, bone,

pulse and marrow, in fruits as in the body of the
creatures, is stated as well. It's published in a
Vaidyakas novel

प्रस्थं कु्ाररका्ांि् ्।

That's a kumarika ser meat. Ghikuwar is named here,

Kumarika, and meat is her pulp.

That means, just as medicinal products and animals

are held in the same term, so are medicinal products
and animal products stated in the same way. The text
of Ayurveda offers this form of explanation. In the
'Aushadikosh' printed in the Srivanketeshwar Journal,
Mumbai, all of the animal nomes and ingredients
mentioned below were seen for flora. We say for the
review a few phrases----

वष
ृ भ-ऋषभकनि सिंिी-कटे ली, वािा िज्स्ि-िज्स्िकनि
श्वान-कुिाघाि, ग्रज्नथपणग खर-खरपणणगनी वपा-णिल्ली=
बक्कल के भीिर का जाला
्ाजागर-त्रबल्लीघाि, चचिा काक-काक्ाची अज्स्थ-गुठली
्यरू -्यरू सशखा वाराि-वारािीकनि ्ांि- गि
ू ा,
जटां्ािी
बीछू-बीछूबूटी ्दिष-्दिषाक्ष, गुग्गुल च्ग-बक्कल
िपग-िवपगणीबूटी श्येन-श्येनघंटी (िनिी) स्नायु-रे शा
अश्व-अश्वगनधा, अज्ोिा ्ेष-जीवशाक नख-नखबट
ू ी
नकुल-नाकुलीबूटी कुक्कुट (टी) शाल््लीवक्ष
ृ ्ेि-्ेिा
िंि-िं िपिी नर-िौगज्नधक िण
ृ लो्(शा)- जटा्ािी
्त्स्य-्त्स्याक्षी ्ािल
ु - घ्रा हृि-िारचीनी
्ष
ू क-्ष
ू ाकणी ्ग
ृ -िििे वी, इनिायण, जटा्ािी, कपरू
पेशी-जटा्ािी
गो-गौलो्ी पशु-अम्बाड़ा, ्ोथा रुचधर-केिर
्िाज-बड़ी अजवायन कु्ारी-घीकु्ार आलम्भन-स्पशग

The collection expresses in just one term the names

of all living birds and their components and the names
of all mammals, as well as their components.
Throughout such a case, no word can be recognized
on an animal or its part.
Scientists here need to find that taking poultry,
animals, etc., from the term 'eating' here in such a
case is not foolish?? No one here will denigrate &
delegitimize the supposedly illumined king meat
carnivore in Sanskrit language through Western
schooling in the direct defiance of Vedic or Indian
tradition in background, and we can send you several
samples in English language as well.

1. Lady finger(bhindi) is considered to a large degree

to be identified. If a woman's finger is perceived in
food by another, isn't that an offence?
2. Any herb classified as vegetable is edible. At the
other hand, its sense as a monotonous understanding
individual is also provided in the Chamber Dictionary.
If anyone sees a human consuming a plant and calls a
man without a head, isn't it stupid?
3. To Ayurveda there is a plant named Kakmari to
Hindi, Govish, and in English there is Fish Berry. What
is it named when somebody says fish juice?
4. Pommy potato is called Potato, indicating a person
with a mental handicap, on the other hand, is a potato
eater a psychiatric patient?
5. Hag At the other side, an hideous elderly lady is
sometimes named hag, and someone is attempting to
change the importance of hag fruit in this House?
What would you say?

Now, why is fruit pulp known as meat? The whole

body or fully compatible substance is called flesh, as
his epigraphic commentary states. All people around
the world use only the fruit's pulp, not other parts, as
the fruit 's essence is the same. It's also the depot of
force-semen, which depicts the emergence, through
use, of the strength-semen-knowingness, etc. Now
should somebody be wondering why the body's flesh
is called the flesh? The answer is that underneath the
muscles is the body 's strength of any creature, and
that is why it is also called flesh. Even like vegetarian
creatures mostly consume fruit pulp, carnivorous
carnivores often enjoy the flesh of their prey solely.
For both, it's close. The pulp 's position in the fruit is
the same as the fat in the body. Obviously man is just
a vegetarian and dairy animal; therefore the talk in
Vedadi scriptures of consuming meat is a symbol of
utter misunderstanding of the Vedadi scriptures. We
conclude that they do not even understand the
alphabet of Vedada, if the supposed Vedicists who are
debating these things are foreign or Indigeanl or how
big a scholar-teacher of grammatical scriptures.

Issue- The term "mansam" in the Veda can not be

interpreted to imply the flesh of the beings; Why
shouldn't it be treated as your prejudice? It was just
done on vegetarian insistence?

Response – The practice of non-violence is known as

the first phase of the yogic practitioner, where the
spirit, actions and acts have transmitted a message of
salvation & Redemption that is, love to each person
anywhere and everywhere, there are Siddhpurus
yogis of the same order, and there is no ignorance and
wrong, by their yoga sadhana, to express the message
of aggression to God and to the Mantras. & It's not
incredibly stupid and horrible to grasp, perceive and
spread the wrong Messages by the aggression
representatives of the Gods & of the divine Maharshi
consulted and by demeaning the Yogasadhana of the
Adiyogis, by misrepresenting their codes,
guidelines and sacred Vedarupa documents in the
same sequential order. Those thinkers who wish to
see Vedic nonviolence should be able to comprehend
Patanjal Yogadarshan himself in his Vyâsārī
metaphysical translation. This Aitareya Brahmin has a
profound understanding of science which we write,
which is understood from a detailed study of this
research, where nearly all commentators practiced
the custom of barbaric slaughtering animals and
devouring their bodies. From a thorough study of this
book this reader can know.

My metaphysical comment

{्ांि् ् = ्नयिे ज्ञायिेऽनेन िि ् ्ांि् ् (उ.को.3.64),

्ांिं पुरीष् ् (श.8.7.4.19), (पुरीष् ् = पुरीषं पण
ृ ािेाः
परू यिेवाग - तन.2.22; िवगत्राऽसभव्यापि् ् -
्.ि.य.भा.38.21; यि ् पुरीषं ि इनिाः - श.10.4.1.7; ि
एष प्राण एव यि ् पुरीष् ् - श.8.7.3.6)}

(एिि ् वा उ स्वािीयाः) These things, which give the

Purush yogi a taste of ecstasy, occur because the
individual is God-compatible; they are differentiated
by the yogi 's spirit. (यिचधगवं क्षीरं वा ्ांिं वा)The
answer to what these things really are is that all those
substances which are constantly freed in senses and
the consciousness of the yogi are the omnipresence
of Om, the Gayatri, etc, which comes from the
Supreme God of every congregation basically-All the
things that are created from the all-embracing
Supreme God continuously produced in the Yogi 's
senses and consciousness. The yogi starts sampling
the happy verses, then begins ecstasy. The yogi can
not feel the gladness of certain rites unless these rites
become consistent with the prana elements which are
continually conveyed throughout the mind and body
of the yogi. Understand the pre-guest episode here.

Significance-Whenever a Yogi practises Yogasadhana,

sings Etadartha Pranava, or Gayatri, then the Om
vibration, which invariably flows from the all-
embracing Supreme Deity, assumes the shape of an
internal Yogi, which secretes the spirit. This keeps the
yogi joyful and embellishes certain jewels.
(Vedvig-alok: from the foreground excerpted)

Here we quote just two Vedic verses-

आश्वााः कणााः गावस्िण्डुलााः। (अथवगवेि 11.3.5)
श्या््योऽस्य ्ांिातन लोदिि्स्य लोदिि् ्।।
(अथवगवेि 11.3.7)
The idea that the particle is horse and cow is rice
should be clear interpretation. The black part of the
rice is flesh and the blood is red. Farukh ji, hey! Say,
where are we going to resist this form of horse and
cow consumption? They do not actually have the
meaning shown in this translation, but, as we
displayed in the preceding mantra, it can also been
construed in three significant ways. I'm not doing this
by extension.

You will now recognise that Vedas have no orthodox

meaning; instead terms have the same theoretical
and compound meaning. See, the Atharvaveda in
which you talk about beef and beef service. It states-

यदि नो गां िं सि यद्यश्वं यदि परू

ु ष् ्।
िं त्वां िीिेन ववध्या्ो (1.16.4)

That is, we 're going to pierce you by lead if you kill

our cow, horse or man.

्ा नो दिंसिष्ट द्ववपिो ्ा चिष्ु पिाः। (11.2.1)

Do not kill our men and livestock, now search in the
Veda elsewhere.
इ्ं ्ा दिंिीद्र्ववपाि पशु् ्। (यजुवेि 13.47)
In other terms, don't harass this two hoofed beast.

इ्ं ्ा दिंिीरे कशफं पश्

ु ्। (यजव
ु ेि 13.48)
That is, do not use this one hoofed animal for
aggression.

यज्ानस्य पशुन ् पादि। (यजु. 1.1)

In other terms, defend Sacrificer's livestock.

They may claim that that is the case with individuals

or pets of a significant man, not all species,
Further evidence to avoid this misunderstanding---

‘स्त्रस्यािं चक्षुषा िवागणण भूिातन ि्ीक्षे।’ (यजु. 36.18)

That's, I consider everyone as a buddy.

‘्ा दि ा्ािी स्िनवा प्रजााः ।’ (यजु. 12.32)

That is, with the entity don't decimate the people.

‘्ा स्त्रेधि’ (ऋ. 7.32.9)

Do not cause abuse. Do not cause aggression.

Brother! Brother! Do you want to demonstrate

aggression in Vedas, too? You 're really effective at
conning, this appears to happen everywhere.
Commenting on 'Aghnya' you stated it is for a
particular cow and not for the entire cow race. You
quoted a reference to Rigveda, confirmation of the
natural talent in lies and manipulation. In the (1.1)
chant of the Yajurveda the term "Aghnya" was
paralleled with the term to the one in the Rigveda
zone. Marriage of convenience is an unnecessary
burden to transcription, to which Rig Veda provides
the address (1.146.27). My challenge in every library
in the world is to showcase the Mantra of that section.
You have to know and understand there are just 5
formulas (R 1.146), but from where did the 27th
come? Then the referencing trajectory went
unprofitable. The 93rd mantra of procession meat has
already been identified (Rigveda 10.85). Redundancy
error here as well. This sukta includes only 48
mantras, but where did the 93rd mantra originate
from? In these 48 mantras, there is no discussion of
serving beef. Yeah, it definitely struggled a great deal
with cow eaters and failures like this .. Where "Rik"
and"Sam "have all been designated cattle in Vedic
language, so devour these cows, wellbeing is going to
occur, life will be enriched. The serving of beef is
forever overlooked while offering the consecrated
hymns of the Rig Veda and Samaveda. The Goddess
that you reference to (Rigveda 10.85.13) is Surya
Vivah, that is to say, ornate Ushah's union, where
'Gavah' implies the rays of the sun and not the cow. Is
this Cow's Usha & Sun high correlation? No, That
indicates that in the month of Magha the rays cease
to exist, that's, it gets ineffective. Unless we take that
into account in the bridegroom context, 'han' dhatu
will not be destroyed. The fact is that the gracefulness
of people like meatbug takes the word 'han' only for
killing, while the Dhatu'Han' is often used to 'carry.' If,
anywhere, you would really like to mean it to destroy
Yes, do instead—-

यथाङ्गा वधगिा शेपस्िेन योवषिास्जजदि। (अथवग

6.101.1)
That's going to say, O man! Surely it would be proof of
insanity because you are full of sperm and kill your
wife. So 'Jahi' means doing the same thing, i.e. moving
to the wife. It is a clear term. The accepting evidence
of Panini Ashtaq for which a cow has been killed is also
called Goghan by the academic using the term
'Goghn.' Again, it is convenient to destroy the
meaning of han Dhatu. The weak are both language
and moral servants. Once, destroying the essence of
the made sense here. The disadvantaged become
victims to both culture and language. What to do? I
would like to propose the Hastaghan, used for
protective gloves, be the expression close to the term
Goghan, otherwise we have to get the context of Han
Dhatu here. Therefore, the essence of the Vedas can
not be taken into consideration in keeping with one's
own interest or will but only in the light and
underlying nature of the Veda. The term 'Goghn'
exists only for Goghati in the Veda. There is a order to
keep apart and not as a visitor from that Goghan.
(Rigveda 1.114.10) is used in-

आरे िे गोघ्न्ुि पुरूषघ्न् ्।

That is, you stay away from Goghati and Narghati.

The Aryan Veda is, in our view, the ultimate and pure
proof, in many books, of the Brahmin, Manusmriti,
Buddhism, Upanishad's, Ramayana,
Rigvedadibhasibhumica and Satyarth Prakash
scriptures, etc. We replied to your claims of violence
in the Veda and now such documentation does not
matter to us. We firmly suspect that many scholars
confused the languages of the Veda Samhita,
although there is some form of misinterpretation and
scanning in certain genuine texts. Also while removing
the evil & darkness, some occurrences of non-
vegetarian followers, remain unsubstantiated to fight
against the Vedas, Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati and
his disciples Arya scholars have made their adventure
to completely eliminate them. We consider the 18
Puranas to be contentious & groundless that we can
not and should not advocate. These texts are the
medieval scholars' works. Also, no Purana is a unique
& distinctive person's creation. Manipulations from
time to time were carried out, and Lord Ved Vyas was
cunningly experimented and demonstrated to be
crafter of these Puranas. The Hindus are misguided
in holding these Illegitimate Scriptures as facts
(although other materials are really highly valued and
authentic), and sticking them to their chest. Now look
at the Brahmin text for meat products.
‘यिा वपष्टानयथ लो्ातन भवज्नि। यिाप आनयति अथ
त्वग्भवति। यिा ि यौत्यथ्ांिं भवति।’
The grain is called loam, the surface of the wheat,
combined with water, the dough is the cognizer for
beef. (Excerpt from the Vedic sampattis. P. 527)

So, where will we resist eating these animal flesh?

Even in Aitareya Brahmin, remarkably similar
interpretation is found.
िस्य यातन ककंशारूणण िातन रो्ाणण, ये िुषााः िा त्वग्ये
फलीकरणास्िििग्ृ यज्त्पष्टं ककक्निास्िन्ांिं
यज्त्कंचचत्कं िारं ििज्स्थ।। इवि ।
Commented on this by Acharya Sajan:

िस्य व्रीदिबीजस्य िंबनधीतन यातन ककंशारूणण

बुिपलालािीतन िातन पशुरो्स्थानीयातन ये
िुषास्िण्डुलवेष्टनरूपााः प्रथ्ावघािेन पररत्याजयााः िा
िष
ु ि्ज्ष्टाः पशत्ु वक्स्थानीया, ये
फलीकरणास्िण्डुलश्वैत्याथेनावघािेन िे या
अंशास्ित्िवग्िक्
ृ पशुरक्िस्थानीय् ्। यज्त्पष्टं
िण्डुलपेशणेन तनश्पननं वपण्डयोग्यं रूपं ये च ककक्निााः
िक्ष्
ू ्ााः वपष्टावयवास्ित्िवं पश्
ु ांिस्थानीय् ्।
यज्त्कंचचकं िारं स्वाथे कप्रत्ययाः
ककंचचिनयद्व्रीदििंबज्नधकादठनयरूपं िारं ििज्स्थ
ित्पशोरज्स्थस्थानीय् ्। एवं पशुिाभ्याि ् पुरोडाशस्य उि
पशत्ु व् ्।।

Hindi Translation by Dr. Sudhakar Malaviya-

The straw (i.e. kinsharu) of the tree is local to the loam
of the farm. The tusha (the wetting type of rice
originating from the first amputation) is the native
skin of the animal, which is the foliage (the haesha
that came out of the stroke to whiten the tendons),
the blood of the animal is regional. The crushed
component, which is the flesh of the animal, is
strategic, and whatever remains is the coarse portion
of the bone of the animal.

While their analysis is not genuine, here they are also

not offered a fleshly impression.
My comment on this interpretation
{ककंशारुाः = ककं शण
ृ ात्यनेनेति ककंशारुाः (उ.को.1.4)।
रो्ाणण = लो्ातन (्.ि.ऋ.भा.1.135.6), (लो् = लूयिे
तछद्यिे िि ् लो् - उ.को.4.152; छनिांसि वै लो्ातन -
श.6.4.1.6)। ककक्निााः = िूक्ष््ााः (आचायग िायण
भाष्य)। ्ांि् ् = ्नोऽज्स््न ् िीििीति वा (तन.4.3),
्ांिं वै परु ीष् ् (श.8.6.2.14), ्ांिं िािन् ्
(श.8.1.4.5)। रो् = रौति शब्ियिीति रो्
(उ.को.4.152)}

{ककंशारुाः = ककं ककंचचि ् कुज्त्ििं वा शण

ृ ािीति (इति ्े
्ि् ्)}
Among the strong and brilliant radiations present in
the material, which is rich in penetrating energy &
force, are called Kinsharu. Then Nighantukara said,
"Kutsa: Vajranam"-Nigam. 2.20. This intense &
prolonged exposure appears to create a range of
vibrations, and some are in the form of Chanda
Vibrations. These vibrations keep cutting off different
substances profoundly, and the dark shielding matter,
which is mixed up in the dimension of the sky
element and is sharp, becomes equivalent to the
layers of all types of particles. In other terms, it
continues coating all the particles. Yes, it is so
important that this dark shielding matter covering
them does not become an impediment in any process
of crystallization, even if it encompasses those
particles. In all these cycles, the factor that is the initial
advocate of penetrating and absorption and mixture,
the Gemini of mind and expression is considered
indestructible in the framework of all these elements.
The Gemini of these elements is more comprehensive
than the other formed elements, and holds the cycles
of creation and destruction of all these elements in
the original influence of the Almighty Conscious
Force. The more subtle these elements are, the
further the mind and speech are intertwined with the
Gemini, because of which they are equally balanced.
These subtle substances are the kernel and place of
subsistence of the gross substances. In all gross
matter, only the force of these subtle substances
works, and in those substances, the basic elements
are in the tendon form. The term 'Saram' is derived
from the term 'sri gatau.' This indicates that the subtle
substance is more potent than the former, which
holds all the material with its energy & force. It is also
capable of projecting various molecules every now
and then. In our way of thinking, this substance is
made of the mind and the voice itself.

Now, see how the myth of carnivores has been going

on in Vedadishastras. Anyone who do not recognize
the theory of Vedadishastras can obtain a certificate
of carnivores as soon as the term 'meat' appears,
while even in such places there is no evidence of
carnivorous orthodoxy. By the way, the theoretical
statement I made on Aitareya Brahmana is in the form
of a massive book of 2800 pages in four sections
named 'Vedvigyan-Alokah.' I've rendered the
empirical commentary on this book for the first time
in the world. This book can be seen as a part of the
great intellectual property of today's world.
Unexpected and significant scientific facts are
revealed from this. At instances where non-social
observers from Aryan states saw abuse, carnivorous
and Aryan intellectuals saw the same generalized
stuff, whereas I saw a lot of abstract and modern
astrophysics, cosmology, chemical, nuclear and
particles physics in the same instances. Science has
often uncovered mysteries that have not been
discovered. As in occasion my Ved Vigyan-loka will be
widely publicized throughout the world in the science
of the scriptures and I make the assumption that on
that day, a modern and unparalleled revolution would
have a prominence in the entire field of the Vedas and
the mystic sages. How do you know about meat
lovers such as the rich, sacred Vedic science of Mr.
Farukh Sahab? Meat-eaters, dumb thinking, self-
requested brains, such as Farouk's Sahab can not
recognize this full of visionary in Vedic Research. It
can't even be grasped by Hindus who call themselves
Vedabhakta.

You have provided Mahabharata's evidence. Let me

again wonder why virtually all the text launchers were
overwhelmed by slyness. Man! Oh! Mahabharata has
a estimate of roughly 95%; evidence of brutality is
then discovered, so what surprise? I'm representing
some thoughts on Mahabharata by the way—
याः स्यािदिंिािम्पक्
ृ िाः ि ध्ग इति तनश्चय। (शाज्निपवग
अ.109.12)
In other terms, the one who is not abusive, is religious
& exclusionary.
अदिंिा िवगभूिेस्यो ध्ेभ्यो जयायिीनिा।। (शाज्निपवग
अ. 265.6)
That is, non-violence is the best option for all species.

िरु ा ्त्स्या ्धु ्ांि्ािवं कृषरौिन् ्।

धूिाःग प्रवतिगि ियेिननैिद् वेिेशु कज्ल्पि् ्। (शाज्निपवग
अ. 265.9)
अदिंिा िकलो ध्गाः। (शा. प. अ. 272.20)
That is to say, sacrificing wine, meat, etc. in the yajna
is against the Vedas and is run by the rapscallions.
Ahimsa is a whole religious doctrine.

बीजैयज्ञ
ग ेशु यष्टव्यस्ति वै वैदिकी श्रुतिाः।
अज िंज्ञातन बीजातन च्छाग नो िनि्
ु िगथ।
नैश ध्गाः ििां िे वा यत्र वध्येि वै पशुाः।। (शा. प.
337.4,5)
In other terms, Yajna should be rendered with seeds,
this is the tradition of the Vedic people. The seeds
have a marker. The slaughter of the goat is completely
bogus custom. That is not the gentleman's faith,
where the animal is slaughtered. Mahabharata
declaration- non-violence is a virtue and Ultimate
dharma statement is appropriate to justify this. The
Pitamah Bhishma teaching describes the utter
rejection of meat. And though nobody believes, the
Mahabharata's 'Anushashana Parva' should be
interpreted in its own way. And If any Vedas or Vedic
Aryans will consider the proof of carnivores in Vedas,
it may be considered berserk.
Indeed, we agree that non-vegetarians frequently
project their tainted thoughts in several disguise,
which scholars will resolve through deliberate and
objective analysis. Your claim is-

'Swami Dayanand states that where Gomedha Yajna

is written, there is talk of the flesh of the male cattle,
because the powerful cattle and the bull are male
animals. & Cow is not such a sort of animal, it's also
written in Gomedh Yajna to be slaughtered.
"(Dayanand Bhava Chitravali, 28, Satyarth Pr.303,
1875)"

Review-It seems as if you were researching Satyarth

Prakash, what did you perceive, I doubt? You wrote it
after you saw the interpretations & references of
Dayananda and Bhava Chitravali. Today,
buying Satyarth Prakash from anywhere in the
universe of Arya, interpreting it, and then denouncing
it, it'll be acceptable then? Indeed, we have no
problem in acknowledging that during the first edition
of Satyarth Prakash, deceptive &
disingenuous authors and non-vegetarian's immoral
views have been penned by devious authors. Fact of
the matter is that Rishivara himself did not compose,
he got it compiled. Such objectionable sections were
attributed to the preoccupation of consigned &
intrusted the job to his trusting people, whom the
sage himself had drawn out in his lifespan and
planned a revised edition. Finally after the lifespan of
the sage was this edition published. The first edition
was printed under king Jayakrishnadas' oversight and
was followed by the above lies and misinformation.
thirteen and fourteen sullas were remained
unpublished. The sage issued publications regarding
the flaws of this subject in Vikram Samvat in 1935.
Once a letter was sent by his devotee Dr. Mukand
Singh, Rais, Chalesar, resident of Aligarh & requested
-
'I want to perform Parvan Shradh, the goat is prepared
for it, too. Conduct this shraddha yourself. In addition,
Maharshiji wrote from Banaras-

'This version has been printed by King Jayakrishnada.

There are a lot of impurities remaining in it. The
Panchamahayagna methodology that I published in
1796, which was written a year before Satyarth
Prakash of Rajaji, if the dead shraddha etc. is
contradicted in it, so how can there be a congregation
in Satyarth Prakash? Therefore, in regards of
Shraddha, the portrayal of the departed Shraddha and
the Law of the flesh is worth ignoring the Vedas.

When the author of the book himself proclaims the

immoral and the repulsive elements of the document
to be erroneous and abhorrent motives of the
treacherous elements of the society, Since today, by
reestablishing the same subject, even after 125 years,
a individual will often quote examples from it and
then you can try to figure what he has to reassure.
Unbiased writers and scientists should take a peek.
Farukhji!-Farukhji! You must abandon your non-
vegetarian patron and seek to understand Lord
Dayanandji Maharaj, the supreme modificator of the
human companion of the Vedic religion,'s thoughts of
the heart and the keen intellect. How does the book
imply about the carnivore? Just look at the Satyarth
Prakash, about what you've just made false
accusations.

"Don't feed with non-vegetarian mlech paws, whose

skin is complemented by beef and meat electrons, "
'Those who destroy such creatures are considered to
harm everyone. The intensity of sorrow of the Aryans
is steadily growing after western non-vegetarians
migrated to this nation to slaughter cows and other
livestock.
See the ocean of goodness, the prudent Dayanand,
states-

Many that fill their bellies, hacking off the throat of

livestock with a dagger contributes to global warming.
Will there be more treacherous, disrespectful, hurting
sinners in the world than them? 'Hey, not vegan!! If
for some period you humans will not have livestock,
do you or won't abandon people's flesh? 'O men of
spirituality!
What are these animals not safeguarded with body,
spirit and money?
(Gokrunanidhi)

Brother, brother. Brother! Unlike the Qur'an, the

Vedic philosophy not only talks of the benefit of the
community or of the country, but also seeks the
protection of sentient beings. For freedom of earth,
space, water, the climate, vegetation, etc., it prays.
Neither world religion except this, is concerned of this
pervasiveness, timeliness, but just egoism. We are the
first to consider a Mahayagya called Balivashdeva,
Popular in Sanatan Dharma, in which the Policy on
food for humans, birds, livestock, starving patients,
helpless people, pets, crows, cows etc. has been
adopted.' How can one commit the sin of a
slitting creature's throat for ones interest of this Great
Religion, then? Sure, sneaky people have instituted
often corrupted material to this universal ideology,
sage Dayanand Saraswatiji attempted first to
eradicate them and the Aryan Samaj does this
heavenly job with his help. The Vedic tradition claims
that the soul & consciousness is populated by
humanity as any living being. Much like us, everyone
experiences sorrow. Everybody is brethren because
they are God's offspring. If a thorn picks, we get
jumped up. Dream! Consider, think! So badly is it
going to cripple if you chomp an animal? Poorly
coerced and tortured, he ends his existence in agony,
while the wicked, like dogs & vultures, Grab their
heads. sJust assume those sly parents
commanding their intelligent toddlers to slaughter
and consume their senseless brothers and the parents
are pleased to have seen this indiscretion &
wrongdoings? This is not conceivable, but how will all
the ancestors, the stars, the heavens, the God be
pleased to see carnivorous misdeeds? Yeah, He would
definitely execute offenders. Perhaps, for the
creatures that are being massacred and slaughtered,
you'll find Rahim Allah is indeed Rahim for Them too.
Would you be eternal because you think they will
perish anyway? If not, then do you want anyone to
attack you and consume you like you do ? Rahim's
devotees themselves remain ahmed, repentance is
productive only then.

Ayurveda & anti-Veg.

When somebody here attempted to claim that there's
a law on meat eating from specific birds and mammals
to avert diseases and illnesses in the Ayurvedic texts
(Charak Shastra and Sushruta Samhita), so how was it
unreasonable & unfair?I would really like to argue in
addition that in the texts of Ayurveda, we do not have
such a predicament of faith & trust since
these textual contexts are Against the Basic Principles
of Vedas & projected. Well, the wise men who
commence their day with nonviolent resistance, yoga
and everyday behaviour and teach all humanity great
health, how will those prudent men speak about the
decapitation of a living thing? Many hazardous &
toxic compounds such as meat that irradiate the mind
and soul may be deemed acceptable when quality of
life is linked to the body and the mind and soul.
Therefore, material as well as metaphysical, is God's
science then, how else can Ayurveda dictate such
iniquity? Could a non-vegetarian ingest away one
disease and not cause a different infection? If indeed,
how should this be considered a part of Ayurveda?
Since many of the carnivores, aggression &
violence listed above give birth to diseases and
natural outbreaks & epidemics, how will our great
Acharya allow them to be accomplished? Thanks to
the Ayurvedan mistake, some carnal and NVPs later
introduced aphrodisiac drugs and NV meat, the
scientific intellects were expected to keep away from
such instances. In addition to this, these examples
must be excluded from the literature through careful
consideration of the Ayurvedan academics.

Allow the last phrases to be deemed appropriate to

offer brief hints. Your declaration is-
'Islam 's best strength is its natural-compatible
instruction. There's nothing we might find unscientific
about a single order in Islam. This theory of
philosophy of Life is not inconclusive or woefully
inadequate.

Analysis-when speaking about Carnivores Beware:-

let sleeping dogs lie? Would there be a massive
disparity between the unscientific, doubtful Qur'an
speculation and the high-ranking research theories of
Modern Science? They are poles apart. Do not
question More than you esteem — This protasis is
entirely right for you. A separate book on this topic
can be published. This post has extended and is out of
context, and it doesn't seem appropriate to respond
in this case. Finally, my suggestion to you is to ponder
a bit, read and speak with me After Researching the
Qur'an properly. Sure, I would claim definitely that by
language from Allah, making the universe, developing
the whole in six days, referencing it for 8 days,
painting the skins of the sky like parchment, wrapping
the sky like vellum, rendering the moon red like blood,
becoming of a bulge in the heaven, lowering
everything ...letting them rise…. Is there any science?
Your Madrasa can teach critical thinking, but by
reading them nobody will become a physical,
astronomical or physiological scientist. This terrible
condition is connected with the columnists not just of
the Quran but also of the Bibles and Puranas reading
something in the Mosque and reading something else
in schooling and in the laboratory. The followers of
these Sect were somewhat staggeringly reluctant to
forego their prejudice, subjectivity and perseverance.

With the Mercy & discretion of the Highest almighty,

the comprehension of and impartial acquiescence of
all the religions of the worlds steps on the one
designated true route and paves the way for spiritual
well-being and human unification & tranquillity. With
the same realization, urge & desire---------

Carnivores
 In the palatinate realm of
Dharma, Artha &
inconspicuous Vedic Sciences

Brothers, Sisters & All intelligentsia from all around

the world!
Remember that the father of this universe and the
Lord, the Almighty rewarded us with meat , milk, food,
dried berries, pure butter, to slake & quench our
sweetness for the taste, so why are the endangered &
chaste animals just being slaughtered for
undigestable dirty cod , trout and fetal larvae Was it
just for fulfilling our cravings? We should also concede
this fact that not only does this give rise to complex
pathogens it also attracts worldwide hazards such as
hurricanes, typhoons, malnutrition, and floods &
Famines. All the world's foremost sins corrupt &
distort this Environment by increasing the toxic
vibrations from terror, rage, suffering and misery.
Join me! Follow me! unite with me! O Guy, the world's
most stunning creatures! Rise, awake, realize, show
your illumination, be vegan and save this globe from
absolute devastation & catastrophe. Awaken
yourselves, the birds and innocent animals
are pleading for their liberty & life. It's your spiritual
obligation just to give them some grace, kindness, and
affection.