Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Direct Costs in Standard Costing
Direct Costs in Standard Costing
Setting cost standards; direct materials cost variances: price and efficiency
variance; direct labor cost variances: price and efficiency variance; journal
entries for direct materials and direct labor cost variances.
As we can see in the table above, when calculating each standard cost, we
multiple the “input” standard rate or price by the “output” standard quantity.
To illustrate a simple example, let’s assume ALumloyParts Ltd. produces
aluminum alloy parts. To manufacture AL200 series tubes, the company uses 1
pound of aluminum to produce 2 tubes. The company expects that in May 20X0
the price of aluminum will be $1.20 per pound. In April 20X0 the company’s
management determines the following standard cost of aluminum (direct
materials) used in AL200 pipes:
Direct Materials:
Materials price standard is the price a company expects to pay per unit of
direct materials (e.g. $ 4 per 1 yard of atlas fabric, $1 per gallon of milk). It is a
standard for the direct materials input. Materials price standard is based on
expected costs of direct materials. It is usually set by a purchasing agent.
Management, with the help from accountants, determines the reasons for
variance occurrence and decides whether to take any further action. To make
such a decision, management may utilize the following guideline:
Inappropriate standard: revise the standard to improve the accuracy of future
budgeting.
Operations out of control: change (correct) operations.
Better than expected operations: make sure quality is maintained.
There are two types of price variances: direct materials price variance and direct
labor price variance. The calculation of both variances applies the same type of
logic: the difference between an actual and standard price is multiplied by an
actual quantity of input. In the case of direct materials, actual quantity of input
represents the actual quantity of purchased materials, and in the case of direct
labor, actual quantity equals the actual hours used.
Direct materials price variance (MPV) is the difference between the actual
quantity purchased at the actual price and the actual quantity purchased at the
standard price. Its formula is provided below:
Direct Materials Price Variance
=
(Actual Price – Standard Price)
x
Quantity Purchased
MPV = (AP – SP) x AQ
Where MPV = Materials price variance; AP = Actual price; SP = Standard price;
and AQ = Actual quantity.
Direct materials price variance is usually calculated at the time direct materials
are purchased. Important to note, companies using standard costing record
direct materials in the raw materials inventory account at a standard price rather
than at an actual one. This reduces bookkeeping complexity because there is no
need to keep track of all different actual prices paid for direct materials. At the
point of purchase, management has to calculate the direct materials price
variance and record it in the books.
To illustrate an example, let’s assume XLCoutureDresses Inc. manufactures
evening dresses. The company usually pays $100 per yard of embroidered silk
fabric. In March 20X0 the company purchased 200 yards of embroidered silk
fabric for $95 a yard, and in April 20X0 it bought 60 yards of the same fabric for
$110 a yard.
In March 20X0 the materials price variance was calculated as follows: MPV =
($95 - $100) x 200 yards = ($1,000). This is a favorable variance because the
company paid $5 dollars less per each yard of the purchased fabric. Also, we
can see that the $1,000 value has a negative sign, which in this case also
indicates a favorable variance. We can abbreviate whether a variance is
favorable or unfavorable by writing the letter “F” or “U” next to the
dollar amount of a variance, accordingly. For instance, in this case we have
the materials price variance of $1,000 F.
Let’s continue our example. In April 20X0 the company had the following direct
materials price variance: MPV = ($110 – 100) x 60 yards = $600 or $600 U.
This is an unfavorable variance because the company paid $10 more than normal
per each yard of the fabric. In addition, in this case, the positive sign of the
dollar amount indicates an unfavorable variance. Importantly, not always
positive and negative signs indicate favorable and unfavorable
variances, accordingly; it depends on the application of formulas (e.g. (actual
price – standard price) or (standard price – actual price) will have the same
value result, but difference signs). Thus, carefully interpret each variance!
There are two types of efficiency variances related to the direct costs: direct
materials efficiency variance and direct labor efficiency variance. They are
calculated using the same logic: the difference between standard quantity of
input and actual quantity of input is multiplied by standard price. It makes sense
to calculate the difference between actual and standard input quantity because
this difference shows how efficiently companies use their resources in
production.
Direct materials efficiency (usage) variance (MEV) compares a standard
and actual quantity of direct materials used in production (i.e. materials put in
production represent input quantity). In other words, it is the difference between
the actual quantity of materials used and the standard quantity that should have
been used at the actual production level, multiplied by the standard price. Its
formula follows:
Direct Materials Efficiency Variance
=
(Actual Quantity For Actual Output
–
Standard Quantity For Actual Output)
x
Standard Price
MEV = (AQ – SQ) x SP
Where MEV = Materials efficiency variance; AQ = Actual quantity of input for
actual output; SQ = Standard quantity of input for actual output; and SP =
Standard price.
To illustrate an example, assume XLCoutureDresses Inc. manufactures evening
dresses. The company usually uses 10 yards of embroidered silk fabric per
evening dress. The standard price of 1 yard of this fabric is $100. In April 20X0
the company manufactured 100 dresses using 900 yards of embroidered silk
fabric. In this case, the standard quantity (of input) for actual output is 1,000
yards of embroidered silk fabric (i.e. 100 dresses (actual output) times 10 yards
per dress = 1,000 yards). Now we can calculate the direct materials efficiency
variance: MEV = (900 yards – 1,000 yards) x $100 per yard = ($1,000) F. The
materials efficiency variance is favorable because the company used 100 yards of
materials less than the standard required.
In April 20X0 the company made the following journal entry:
Dr Work-in-process Inventory (1,000 yards x $100) 10,000
Cr Direct Materials Efficiency Variance 1,000
Cr Raw Materials (900 yards x $100 per yard) 9,000
As we can see once again, companies enter data into the inventory
accounts at standard prices and standard quantities, in some cases.
Previously, XLCoutureDresses recorded the purchased raw materials in the raw
inventory accounts at the standard price (e.g. in April 20X0, 60 yards x $100 per
yard). When the company used the materials in the production, it credited the
raw materials inventory for the actual amount of raw materials used times the
standard price (i.e. 900 yards x $100 per yard). Also, the company recorded the
used materials in the work-in-process inventory account at both the standard
quantity and standard price (i.e. 1,000 yards x $100 per yard).
Direct labor efficiency (usage) variance (LEV) compares the actual and
standard amount of labor hours used in production. In other words, it is the
difference between the actual hours used and the standard hours that should
have been used at the actual production level, multiplied by the standard rate.
The formula follows:
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance
=
(Actual Hours For Actual Output
–
Standard Hours For Actual Output)
x
Standard Price
LEV = (AQ – SQ) x SP
Where LEV = Labor efficiency variance; AQ = Actual quantity of input (hours) for
actual output; SQ = Standard quantity of input (hours) for actual output; and SP
= Standard price (rate).
To illustrate an example, assume XLCoutureDresses Inc. manufactures evening
dresses. The company usually uses 8 hours of direct labor per evening dress.
The standard price (rate) of 1 labor hour is $10. In April 20X0 the company
manufactured 100 dresses using 820 labor hours. In this case, the standard
quantity (of input) for actual output is 800 direct labor hours (i.e. 100 dresses
(actual output) times 8 labor hours per dress = 800 labor hours). Now we can
calculate the direct labor efficiency variance: LEV = (820 hours – 800 hours) x
$10 per hour = $200 or $200 U. The labor efficiency variance is unfavorable
because the company used 20 labor hours more than the standard required.
In April 20X0 the company made the following journal entry:
Dr Work-in-process Inventory (800 hours x $10 per hour) 8,000
Dr Direct Labor Efficiency Variance 200
Cr Wages Payable (820 hours x $10 per hour) 8,200
rare in real life) the AQ x SP is the ending point for the efficiency variance and
starting point for the price variance.
The other table shows a situation (which is more common in real life) when the
quantity of inventory purchased does not equal the quantity of inventory used
during the month. In such situations the AQ x SP for the efficiency and price
variances will be based on different quantities and thus, efficiency and price
variances must be calculated separately (can’t use the same AQ x SP). The price
variance will be based on the quantity purchased and the efficiency variance will
be based on the quantity used.
a case, the company might have to either use more materials (of a lower quality)
than the standard requires or use more direct labor hours to produce the
product. Purchasing materials of a quality higher than needed could also result in
an unfavorable variance. Expensive high quality materials not always result in the
higher sales of the product made of such materials, and the company would
incur higher product costs in such a case.
Moreover, there can be a trade-off between difference variance. Elimination of
one unfavorable variance could cause the occurrence of another unfavorable
variance. For example, if a company’s management increases the monitoring of
its employees working with expensive direct materials, this could improve the
materials efficiency variance (e.g. from an unfavorable to a favorable variance),
but at the same time it could have an adverse affect on the labor efficiency (i.e.
cause an unfavorable labor efficiency variance). Thus, in this example we see a
trade-off between an unfavorable materials efficiency variance and an
unfavorable labor efficiency variance.
Examples of reasons causing direct cost variances are provided in the table
below:
0322-3385752
F.B.AREA, KARACHI.
SEMESTER 1
PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTING
SEMESTER 2
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
IN JUST 2 MONTHS
0322-3385752
R-1173, AL-NOOR SOCIETY, BLOCK 19,
F.B.AREA, NEAR POWER HOUSE,
KARACHI.