Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manager's Guide To Competitive Marketing Strategies .5
Manager's Guide To Competitive Marketing Strategies .5
Chapter Objectives
To enable you to:
1. Describe the characteristics and
applications of the three basic methods of
primary data collection: experimentation,
observation and interview.
2. Compare the strengths and weaknesses of
the three principal interview research
strategies: in-person, telephone and mail.
3. List the useful applications of focus group
interviews.
4. Identify which marketing mix factors affect
a product’s image and how an image can
be researched.
5. Utilize the variety of sources for secondary
information and the World Wide Web.
Better and more successful strategy decisions can be made when based on
facts rather than hunches. These facts are the product of marketing research,
which act as a listening post between your company and the customer.
However, the ideal is often not attained because of budget and time
constraints. Some marketing research projects have to be completed rather
quickly and this haste severely limits their thoroughness. Similarly, insufficient
funds for marketing research may limit the amount and quality of work that
can be completed.
The following case sets the scene for the practical application of marketing
research by showing how a company applied market feedback to reveal new
product and market opportunities.
Significant growth towards recovery began when the then CEO Jean-Pierre
Rosso launched a new era for Case. His fundamental assertion when taking
office marked a new humility for the equipment maker and rekindled respect
for its customers: “We need to be asking what the farmer and contractor
really need,” declared Rosso.
Basic as his statement may appear, for several tumultuous years “asking” was
not part of Case’s product development process. Instead, products flowed
off the production line to optimize factory capacity. That resulted in churning
out such products as low horsepower tractors that entered the market place
through low prices and incentives.
Worse yet, when market demand plummeted, dealers found themselves with
a glut of unsold Case equipment. To aggravate the situation further, relation-
ships with dealers deteriorated, characterized by dealers’ suspicion of new
product announcements.
Case’s strategies
In the face of those desperate conditions, Case managers set out to determine
the wants and needs of its customers. One incident showcases the process
managers used to obtain reliable customer feedback:
• A contractor was flown in and put to work for three exhaustive days
testing a piece of Case equipment and comparing performance with
similar Caterpillar and Deere machines. Each day and well into the
night hours, managers and engineers grilled the customer about
features, benefits and operating problems.
• In another approach, Case sent teams of engineers and marketing
personnel to talk to key customers and users of rival equipment.
To reduce the time and cost of design – and to shrink inventories – Case began
building its new family of backhoes around a common platform. Result: 75
per cent of parts are shared, up from 30 per cent.
Bottom line: All this market-driven “asking” is a far cry from Case’s former
practices.
What can you learn from the Case example? The successful use of customer
feedback can apply to your business, as well. Especially in predicaments where
you have to reverse a sales decline, polish a tarnished product image, or re-
establish customer relationships.
Types of data
You can get the data needed for marketing research either by turning to existing
information (secondary data) or by generating your own (primary data).
Initially, you should avoid a primary research study for reasons of time and
cost.
The distinction between the two types of data is a matter of purpose and control.
With secondary data you have no control over their gathering, processing
and interpretation. Therefore, check carefully to see how applicable they are
to your situation.
Even so, a thorough review of available secondary data is a must before you
undertake a primary research project, because these data may provide all
the answers you need. For instance, if you must find out who are the heavy
users of powdered detergents and where they are located, it would be unwise
to collect your own data at great expense.
Data of this type is readily available from commercial suppliers. Even if you
want to know who your own ultimate buyers are, you don’t necessarily need
to generate your own information. A professional data collection organization
may already have this information in its files.
Of course, if you come up with ‘what if’ questions, secondary data are no
longer useful. They cannot address the issues of new product information,
reactions to advertising, the impact of alternative pricing approaches, or the
effect of a package change, among others.
It then becomes unavoidable to generate your own data for the specific research
purpose at hand. To help you do so, you have three major methods at your
disposal that have been refined to a high degree of sophistication:
experimentation, observation and interviewing.
Experimentation
Experimental research aims to discover the impact of changes of two variables
to help you optimize your marketing mix. It involves creating artificial situations
in which all variables except the one to be tested are kept constant.
Observation
Should you want the reactions of consumers to your product, packaging,
advertising, or some other aspect of your marketing mix, observation can
supply you with the input. Researcher and marketing manager could
personally watch a test for a firsthand look at the consumer’s reaction to an
intended change before implementing it on a large scale.
Interviewing
Interviewing is asking questions of selected respondents who might possess
valuable insights about the group under investigation. Such survey research
can be conducted formally or informally, structured or unstructured and
disguised.
These various characteristics explain why interviewing is by far the most widely
and most frequently used approach in primary data generation. It is not as
cumbersome and expensive as experimentation and it digs beneath the
observed behavioural surface in perception and motivation.
Response bias, on the other hand, is the distortion inherent in the answers
given due to misinterpretation of the questions or deliberate misrepresentation.
You will want to keep the rate of return as high and the response bias as low
as the constraints of time and budget will allow.
Table 5.1 compares the three primary interviewing techniques. The various
criteria can assist you in examining their relative merits and choosing the
approach best suited to your research objectives.
Flexibility in data Most flexible. Can Fairly flexible. Least flexible. But
collection use videos, depth Although visual pictures and rating
probes and various aids and extensive scales that do not
rating scales, and rating scales require
can even alter cannot be used. investigator
direction of assistance may be
interview while incorporated into a
still in progress. questionnaire. Too
many open-ended
questions reduce
response rate.
Focus group interviews are a flexible, versatile and powerful tool for the
decision-maker. These interviews can furnish you with valuable information
on a variety of competitive and marketing problems in a short span of time
and at a nominal cost. But you have to keep in mind their limitations.
Focus groups are a qualitative research technique and should not be a device
for head counting. The results of focus group interviews cannot be projected
to your target market at large. They may not even be representative and
certainly cannot replace the quantitative research that will supply you with
the necessary numbers.
Fewer than six poses the danger of participants feeling inhibited. More than
ten could result in some members not being heard. The idea, of course, is to
get input from everybody.
A successful session leads to thoughts and ideas that were not anticipated.
Consequently, it is vital that the moderator create an atmosphere conducive
to spontaneity and candour. This format allows for flexibility and enables the
moderator to pursue leads suggested by participants. Table 5.2 contains
guidelines that will help avoid crucial mistakes.
DO DON’T
After you have completed all your focus group interviews related to a particular
marketing problem, listen to the tapes several times and excerpt relevant
statements. Frequently, verbatim transcripts are made with the moderator’s
statements capitalized for easier identification. Videotapes offer an additional
benefit over voice tapes, since you can examine gestures and facial expressions
as well as posture (body language).
Then with the coming of the World Wide Web and its easy-to-use browser
interface, the Internet became a viable platform for online research services,
database producers and primary publishers of all types.
Legislative/regulatory Biographies
information
The following case illustrates the scope of competitor and market intelligence
needed to drive business development, product innovation – and refine overall
marketing strategies.
Case example
Procter & Gamble has taken the bold move of spinning off a totally inde-
pendent company separated physically, organizationally and culturally from
its vast corporate structure. The innovative start-up is known by an imagi-
native name: reflect.com.
The business concept calls for selling cosmetics and hair products customized
to the looks and preferences of each woman who shops on the Internet. Its
specific goal: introduce make-up and shampoos so personalized that no two
individuals would get the same items.
What can you learn from the reflect.com case? The World Wide Web is now
the trigger for the explosive level of activity designed to acquire finite
information not only of groups but also of individual behaviour. The
technology is becoming so pervasive and eye-popping that individuals can
surf the Web and do their shopping through secured transactions. Then, as
customers make enquiries or purchases, hidden files or tags called ‘cookies’
are deposited on their computers. Software programs then use those files to
track and analyze online behaviour. Such data becomes the underpinning to
design a product or service offering built around a one-on-one approach.
The information gathering activity is so mammoth that one Web portal, Yahoo!,
collects some 400 billion bytes of information every day – the equivalent of
a library crammed with 800,000 books – about where visitors click on a site.
Armed with the information, it calculates which ads and products appeal most
to visitors so it can garner more e-commerce sales.
Then there are the abundant information sources available with the popularity
of Google, CompuServe, Prodigy and America Online, which give users access
to numerous print publications, all at a modest fee. For example, online
company directories for companies, their divisions and subsidiaries typically
provide the following information: business description, annual revenues,
number of employees, SIC codes, officer names and titles, year founded and
stock-related information.
Altogether, the World Wide Web opens up an unparalleled source for detailed
information on industries, companies, company individuals, competitors and
consumer behaviour that can add greater precision to your research and
consequently to your plans and strategies.
Image research
The consumer and the industrial purchaser buy an image as well as a product
or service. An image is the complex of attitudes, beliefs, opinions and expe-
riences that make up an individual’s total impression of a product, service,
or organization.
For example, Gillette Company has long produced quality products for men.
When Gillette introduced a deodorant intended for both men and women,
women were reluctant to consider it for their personal use. Only when the
company stressed a family theme in its advertising for Right Guard did Gillette
attain the top position in this market.
The example can extend to industrial goods, utilities, or foreign markets. But
it becomes clear, even from this brief description that familiarity with one’s
own image is of great importance. To that end, you should conduct image
research.
Trying to change an existing image is a slow and expensive process that requires
considerable patience, skill and commitment. The best insurance against an
unfavourable image is prior testing of strategic and tactical marketing moves.
As a manager you know that images, as intangible and elusive as they are,
cannot be left to chance. Rather, they need careful and skilful management.
Developing an image
An image stems from a multitude of factors. It can be outcomes of a company’s
own efforts as well as those of its competitors. It can result from the choice
of corporate or brand name, the symbolism used, or any other part of the
entire marketing effort, including product design, pricing and distribution.
The symbolism may include logos, slogans, jingles, colours, shapes, or
packaging.
They reported that the one in the yellow package damaged the fabric, while
the one in the blue package with yellow sprinkles was just right, having enough
cleaning power but gentle on the clothes. This example shows that a mere
change in packaging colours can substantially influence the image of a product.
Therefore, if you plan to strategically shape your product’s image, Table 5.4
offers some useful insights and guidelines. It presents a dozen image
ingredients that are under your control and briefly highlights their respective
roles in determining your product’s overall image.
Changing an image
The answer to the question, “How can an image be changed?” can often be
summed up in one word: quality. If you determine that your product’s malady
is an unfavourable image, you can correct this situation by first being concerned
with quality.
Case example
Hyundai Motor Co. lived for several years with a dismal image problem that
even became a verbal target for late-night TV hosts with such debasing
comments as: Hyundai is a car that “you have to push to get going; and it
only goes downhill.” That was in 2000.
Five years later, Hyundai moved from talk-show joke to serious contender
with a real shot at successfully challenging specific models from Toyota, Honda
and Ford; and for achieving a ranking among the world’s top carmakers.
The move centred on new products with quality as the spearhead of its image-
remake strategy.
Hyundai’s strategies
The company totally reengineered its mainstay Sonata sedan with bumper-
to-bumper changes, including a more powerful engine, a bigger cabin and
superior suspension. Hyundai hopes the new Sonata, along with a small SUV,
will be the first in a string of winners. Specifically, the South Korean company
implemented the following changes:
• Quality: Engineers focused on fixing even the smallest problems with
the satisfying result that Hyundai appears favourably alongside Toyota
and Honda on customer satisfaction surveys.
• Exports: Exports account for 64 per cent of sales, up from 30 per cent
in 2000. New overseas plants will help double production capacity
to 5 million cars annually by 2010.
• R&D: New design and R&D operations in Europe, Japan and the U.S.
have been expanded and funded to develop new models, engines and
transmissions with Toyota, Honda and Ford as its benchmark for
quality.
What can you learn from the Hyundai case? In addition to all the above areas
that represent quality, also examine the quality of your sales force and service
organization to improve the presentation and quality of product performance.
There have been occasional instances when an entire sales force has been
replaced in an attempt to strengthen a company’s image and sales.
All told, the availability of a reliable, competent and friendly service is certainly
a key factor that makes up quality and, in turn, can make or break a sale.
Industry studies
A variety of broad industry studies are conducted by organizations such as
Frost & Sullivan Inc., Arthur D. Little Inc., Stanford Research Institute and
a number of Wall Street securities firms. It should be noted that many of these
studies do attempt to make broad generalizations. You should carefully examine
these reports to be sure of applications for your particular organization.
Trade associations
There are a variety of directories (published by Gale Research Company, for
example) of trade associations covering virtually every product or business
category.
Other research sources: Audit Bureau of Circulation; Audits and Surveys; Dun
& Bradstreet; National Family Opinion; Standard Rate and Data Service, Inc.;
and Starch/Inra/Hooper, Inc., Information Access Company (exclusive use
of research on the World Wide Web).
Overall, the central methods for gathering market intelligence include the
following:
• Competitive audits: Measure market share and find out how competitors
‘stack up’ against each other in product quality, performance, delivery,
price and distribution – as well as any other areas of particular
significance to your industry and to prospective customers.
• Customer satisfaction studies: After you have made your initial entry,
track your company’s performance over a period of time and
measure progress (or lack of it) towards becoming a better supplier.
• Perceptive review: Find out through personal observation or formal
research techniques how competing products are perceived. Also
identify if there are any neglected, poorly served, or emerging market
niches that represent additional opportunities.
Summary
There is an overwhelming amount of information available to input into a
marketing intelligence system. Yet, as a practical matter, there is not enough
time or money to gather all the pertinent information and sort out what is
significant to make meaningful decisions and commit company resources.
The bottom line: If you are going to develop strategies and tactics that have
any real chance of success, you must rely on quality intelligence to support
your decisions and subsequent actions.