Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manager's Guide To Competitive Marketing Strategies .4
Manager's Guide To Competitive Marketing Strategies .4
This part, then, answers the question: What do you do with all the competitive
analysis and other marketing data? Chapters 6 and 7 describe a structure
for organizing and sorting the information into a useable format for shaping
your objectives and actions. That structure is the strategic marketing plan.
Chapter Objectives
To enable you to:
1. Develop a competitor intelligence system.
2. List the applications of a market
intelligence system as they relate to
developing competitive strategies.
Marketing and sales executives are discovering that market and competitive
intelligence systems represent potent strategic and tactical weapons. By using
information in a variety of new ways, you can better support your core products,
offer new value-added services that distinguish them from competitors and
create new products and businesses that extend your markets.
As management guru Peter Drucker points out, “In the next 10 to 15 years,
collecting outside information is going to be the next frontier.” The following
case illustrates how one organization found new places to grow its business.
Was that just a play on words? How did the notion of being in the controls
business help Honeywell? How did managers translate the concept into a
competitive strategy?
Action strategy
What can you learn from the Honeywell case? Honeywell’s growth strategy
of leaning heavily on its core products and broadening its product definition
can apply to your business, as well. Yet, there is still another component to
implementing the strategy: determining where to sell the products, which in
turn, means relying on accurate marketing intelligence to pinpoint opportunities.
Finding new places to grow surface constantly. Your best approach is to utilize
as many of the above sources as possible and organize an information system
to capture the opportunity.
Today’s market place does not allow for a great deal of management by instinct
and intuition. Still, many managers feel compelled to utilize that approach
because they find management science techniques overwhelming and
intimidating. As is often the case, a compromise between the two extremes
seems to be the answer.
The web affords timely and comprehensive coverage of the world’s leading
trade and business journals, as well as up-to-date directory information on
today’s fastest growing companies. There is an enormous wealth of
competitive intelligence to help identify the key developments and trends that
influence their business or profession.
Important, too, is that the World Wide Web provides you with a barometer
of popular culture. The databases enhance your search for trends in the
following areas:
• Research on ways in which consumer products are marketed to specific
ethnic groups.
The following case illustrates the value of market intelligence where a company
moved against a market leader with 80 per cent share of market.
Case example
Invacare Corp., a manufacturer of home health care equipment, has been
winning major market share in the highly competitive wheelchair segment.
To do so, Invacare had to contend with the formidable Everest & Jennings
International that, during one time period, controlled an 80 per cent share
of the wheelchair market.
Invacare’s strategies
For Invacare to gain any leadership position it had to use market intelligence
to identify weak spots through which to implement strategies of differentiation.
Here is how Invacare proceeded:
1. Despite its inability to meet consumers’ expectations, it had for a long
time enjoyed supremacy in this industry. However, whether real or
imagined, Invacare managers noted that customers were beginning
Also, to arm itself against the inevitable price wars with look-alike products,
Invacare embraced continuous improvement, quality and cost-cutting
procedures to protect its growing market position.
Action strategy
What can you learn from the Invacare case? Invacare managers shaped their
strategies with the confident attitude that the size of a competitor was not
the issue, nor should the market leader intimidate them.
The importance of any marketing intelligence system does not lie in the elegance
of its logic or the harmony of the hardware in the computer centre. Rather,
its value is measured by its use in decision-making. Therefore, give high priority
to getting your system into the mainstream of your company’s marketing
management process.
Also, the marketing intelligence system is not supposed to inundate you with
reams of computer printouts. Rather, it is to synthesize variable activities to
facilitate managerial decision-making. The delivery mechanisms can be more
or less costly and sophisticated, depending on your management’s priorities.
What you should expect from your system is to be able to run your business
more efficiently on a day-to-day basis. It should also be used to track progress
toward long-term strategic goals and alert you to significant competitive and
market changes.
Table 4.1 summarizes what your system can and cannot do for you. The intent
here is to show that if the task of developing a system is given to an IT manager
or outsourced to a provider, you should have input to its design and usefulness.
Once again, the primary criterion: does the system provide reliable intelligence
that can shape your competitive marketing strategies?
This single form of intelligence gathering provides just one example of how
ferociously businesses are working to get information on competitors. But
bugging competitors’ meeting rooms is not the only method for obtaining
such intelligence.
The following case example shows how one company used competitor
intelligence as part of an overall marketing intelligence system to gain
competitive advantage.
Case example
Nabisco Corp. is the maker of such favourite cookies as Oreo and Chips Ahoy!
brands. Together with its 65-year-old flagship brand Ritz Crackers, there’s
enough brand equity to make most managers feel comfortable, particularly
with snack-hungry consumers.
But such feelings often breed complacency. That’s what happened to Nabisco
when its chief rival, Procter & Gamble, pulled off a marketing coup. P&G’s
Duncan Hines operation secretly prepared a soft chocolate chip cookie to
attack Oreo and Chips Ahoy!.
The assault caused total shock to Nabisco. Within only a few months P&G
seized a full third of the test market, while Nabisco’s sales nose-dived by 30
per cent.
How did it happen? By Nabisco’s admission, they fell asleep. Their field
intelligence did not detect the goings-on at Duncan Hines.
Result: P&G’s Duncan Hines brand garnered only a five per cent share of
the national market, while Nabisco’s national cookie share actually jumped
two points to 36 per cent.
The incident left its scars on Nabisco’s managers who vowed never to be
caught napping again. Now, they have one of the strongest new products
marketing teams in the food business.
Whereas, at the time of the P&G attack, Nabisco was introducing about two
or three new products a year. Within a two year time period, it has launched
more than 100 new products and line extensions, including reduced fat versions
of Oreos, Chips Ahoy! and Triscuits.
Action strategy
What can you learn from the Nabisco case? For starters, if attacked by an
aggressive competitor trying to pry away market share from you, develop a
superior market intelligence system – or strengthen your existing one, with
emphasis on your competitors.
Further, the system then attempts to collect the following information about
all major competitors:
Competitor’s plans Distribution facilities and strategy
Competitor’s organization Pricing strategy
Product strategy Regulatory strategy
Production strategy Major events
New product development Product line strategy
Investment strategy
Finally, the primary lesson you can derive from the Nabisco case:
There is no reliable way to develop competitive strategies without accumulating
and accurately interpreting market intelligence.
In order to understand the flow of data, you need to examine the following
parts of the system.
Management analysis
The first four procedures are mechanical ways of collecting, compiling and
cataloguing data. The analytical and creative aspects now apply as you begin
to synthesize the data to detect opportunities. It is appropriate to call in key
functional managers from finance, manufacturing and product development
to assist in the analysis.
Formulating strategies
As has been mentioned elsewhere, the whole purpose of internal and external
analysis and the entire competitor intelligence system is to develop competitive
strategies.
Case example
Fisher-Price Inc., an industry leader in children’s toys, with a stronghold in
the pre-school market, found itself in a precarious position after making a
foray into toys for older children. Even backed with an extraordinary image
for product quality and a loyal customer base honed by years of dedication
to pre-schoolers, the expansion cost Fisher-Price dearly. Share in its core market
nose-dived from 64 per cent to 44 per cent, with a corresponding drop of 17
per cent in revenues.
The painful experience required corrective actions, such as pulling back from
product development projects beyond its traditional pre-school market, closing
three factories and other aggressive cost cutting measures.
Let’s examine the contributing factors to the problem and observe the lessons:
Market expansion
Expanding into additional segments, after reaching an acceptable market share
position in your primary market, is a prudent option. After all, aren’t the strategy
lessons touted by marketing experts for the 21st century geared toward
searching for new market segments?
If Fisher-Price looked for new segments in a mature market, so, too, did its
competitors: Rubbermaid and Hasbro. When Fisher-Price launched into the
older kids segment, the diversion created a ‘window’ through which the
competitors saw an opportunity to make a massive assault into Fisher-Price’s
core market of pre-schoolers.
These moves were legitimate and almost predictable. One can assume the
competitors had been eyeing expansion into the pre-school segment for a
long time.
Action strategy
What can you learn from the Fisher-Price case? Above all, when going outside
your prime markets use Competitive Intelligence (CI) to determine your
competitors’ strategies.
For product life cycle analysis, marketing systems output can be used at the
introduction stage to:
• Determine if the product is reaching the intended audience segment
and how customers are reacting to the initial offering.
• Analyze the marketing mix and its various components for possible
modifications, for example, product performance, back-up service
and additional warranties.
• Monitor for initial product positioning to prospects – that is, to determine
if customer perceptions match intended product performance.
• Identify possible points of entry by competitors in such areas as
emerging or poorly served segments, product or packaging innovations,
aggressive pricing, concentrated or innovative promotions, distribution
incentives and add-on services.
Summary
As indicated at the outset of this chapter, your company’s marketing effort
requires a practical marketing intelligence system. Attempting to fashion a
strategy without reliable information opens you up to excessive risks, as
compared to planning a course of action that permits you to manoeuvre to
areas of greatest opportunity at the least cost of resources.