Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    Notas Calidad Grado 20182019

    Uploaded by

    Camila Aguirre
    This document contains a table summarizing student grades in quality management for artificial intelligence. It lists the names of students, their scores on two midterm exams, average exam score, scores on six assignments, total points, final average grade, and final percentage rating. The highest performing students received grades from 8.5 to 9.25 out of 10 and the lowest grades were from 5 to 6.75.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Notas Calidad Grado 20182019

    Uploaded by

    Camila Aguirre
    4 views2 pages
    This document contains a table summarizing student grades in quality management for artificial intelligence. It lists the names of students, their scores on two midterm exams, average exam score, scores on six assignments, total points, final average grade, and final percentage rating. The highest performing students received grades from 8.5 to 9.25 out of 10 and the lowest grades were from 5 to 6.75.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    notas calidad grado 20182019 (2)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a table summarizing student grades in quality management for artificial intelligence. It lists the names of students, their scores on two midterm exams, average exam score, scores on six assignments, total points, final average grade, and final percentage rating. The highest performing students received grades from 8.5 to 9.25 out of 10 and the lowest grades were from 5 to 6.75.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    4 views2 pages

    Notas Calidad Grado 20182019

    Uploaded by

    Camila Aguirre
    This document contains a table summarizing student grades in quality management for artificial intelligence. It lists the names of students, their scores on two midterm exams, average exam score, scores on six assignments, total points, final average grade, and final percentage rating. The highest performing students received grades from 8.5 to 9.25 out of 10 and the lowest grades were from 5 to 6.75.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Gestión de la Calidaden la IA. Grado Ingeniería Alimentaria ETSIAAB 2018/2019.

     Notas Evaluación Continua

    EXÁMENES EVALUACIÓN CONTINUA TAREAS Nota Final


    NOMBRE DEL ALUMNO EECC I EECC II med EECC Tarea 1 Tarea 2 Tarea 3 Tarea 4 Tarea 5 Tarea 6 Suma Prom FPR
    ALONSO PEDRAZA, LUCIA 7 7,5 7,25 75,00 70,00 55,00 70,00 70,00 65,00 405,00 6,75 7,1
    BERMUDEZ LEIROS, VALENTINA 7 8 7,5 75,00 90,00 80,00 85,00 85,00 80,00 495,00 8,25 7,8
    BERROCAL MUÑOZ, JUAN MANUEL 6,5 7,5 7 65,00 90,00 80,00 90,00 95,00 0,00 420,00 7,00 7,0
    CARNEROS DE LA RUA, ZAIDA 6,5 6,5 6,5 85,00 95,00 85,00 90,00 75,00 70,00 500,00 8,33 7,2
    CHASILUISA FUENTES, GRACE 6,5 7 6,75 85,00 70,00 0,00 95,00 70,00 65,00 385,00 6,42 6,6
    CHICAIZA QUEZADA, JENNIFER ALEJANDRA 9 9 9 95,00 80,00 75,00 95,00 95,00 85,00 525,00 8,75 8,9
    DIAZ BACHILLER, MARIO 6,5 6 6,25 70,00 70,00 75,00 100,00 70,00 70,00 455,00 7,58 6,8
    EL HADDAD , ADNANE 7 6,5 6,75 80,00 85,00 75,00 90,00 85,00 70,00 485,00 8,08 7,3
    FRANCO LABRADOR, CLAUDIA 7 6,5 6,75 75,00 75,00 75,00 85,00 100,00 95,00 505,00 8,42 7,4
    GARCIA CASAMAYOR, SARA 6 6,5 6,25 65,00 75,00 70,00 90,00 0,00 0,00 300,00 5,00 5,8
    GARCIA DOBLAS, ANDRES np
    GARCIA MIRANDA, GRACIELA ABIGAIL 8 9 8,5 95,00 80,00 75,00 100,00 95,00 70,00 515,00 8,58 8,5
    GUTIERREZ GARCIA, NATALIA 9,5 9 9,25 98,00 80,00 85,00 100,00 90,00 85,00 538,00 8,97 9,1
    MARTIN GARCIA, JOSE PABLO np
    MERINO DOMINGUEZ, JORGE 7,5 7 7,25 75,00 90,00 80,00 80,00 85,00 80,00 490,00 8,17 7,6
    MUÑOZ DEL RIO, LAURA 6 5,5 5,75 70,00 85,00 70,00 85,00 70,00 55,00 435,00 7,25 6,4
    PABLOS PUERTAS, MARIA DEL MAR 6 6 6 75,00 75,00 75,00 85,00 70,00 55,00 435,00 7,25 6,5
    PEREZ GALLARDO, JORGE 6,5 8,5 7,5 80,00 85,00 75,00 90,00 85,00 0,00 415,00 6,92 7,3
    REY MORENO, CARMEN 7 6,5 6,75 85,00 90,00 65,00 85,00 70,00 75,00 470,00 7,83 7,2
    ROJAS CARBAJAL, ROSA GADELLY 6 6,5 6,25 85,00 95,00 85,00 90,00 75,00 70,00 500,00 8,33 7,1
    RUIZ‐PEREZ DIAZ‐REGAÑON, JORGE 7 8,5 7,75 90,00 65,00 80,00 85,00 75,00 75,00 470,00 7,83 7,8
    SALAZAR SANCHEZ‐FERRAGUT, JORGE DE 7,5 9 8,25 80,00 95,00 0,00 90,00 70,00 0,00 335,00 5,58 7,2
    SERRADILLA RUFINO, ANDREA 8 7 7,5 70,00 90,00 80,00 95,00 85,00 70,00 490,00 8,17 7,8
    SHAIKH‐QASEM SEBASTIAN, SARA 7,5 7 7,25 80,00 85,00 100,00 90,00 85,00 70,00 510,00 8,50 7,8
    VELASCO SANTIAGO, LAURA 7 6,5 6,75 65,00 85,00 70,00 90,00 65,00 55,00 430,00 7,17 6,9

    Revisión a lo largo de la próxima semana (26‐30 de noviembre de 2018) con solicitud previa vía mail a felipe.palomero@upm.es

    You might also like