| TB)
Lr Co
Pete cy
Peed
Stainless steel in
municipal waste water
treatment plants
by AH. Tuthill and S. Lamb
Nem Cota tN eee)The material presented in
this publication has been
prepared for the general
information of the reader
and should not be used or
relied on for specific applica-
tions without first securing
competent advice.
The Nickel Development
Institute, its members, staff
and consultants do not
represent or warrant its
suitability for any general or putin Ee Tut
specific use and assume no and Stephen Lamb
liability or responsibility of are consultants to the
any kind in connection with Nickel Development Institute
the information herein.Nickel Development institute
Guidelines for the use of
stainless steel in
municipal waste water
treatment plants
AH. Tuthill
S. Lamb
Stainless steel piping has served as the standard material
of construction for municipal waste water treatment plants
(WWTP'S) builtin the United States over the past 25 years.
A typical plant is shown in Figure 1.
Since the late 1960"s, over 1600 municipal WWTP's
have been built using stainless steel aeration, digester gas and
sludge transfer piping, as well as stainless ste! stide gates,
valves, tanks, screens, handrails and other equipment. Stain-
less steel was selected originally over galvanized and painted
carbon steel in order to reduce the higher maintenance and
replacement costs associated with these less corrosion resis-
tant materials, Overall experience has been good to excellent
(1). This anicle reviews the suitability and performance ofthe
several grades of stainless steels that have been used or con-
sidered for waste water treatment plants and identifies
guidelines that will assist the user to obtain the best results
from the stainless steel selected for these plants.
‘The austenitic grades used in waste water treatment
plants have 16-20% Cr, 8-14% Ni and the Mo containing.
‘grades, 2-3% Mo, Table Ishows the common name, the UNS
number, the British, German and Swedish designations and
‘compositions forthe wrought grades. Table ITshows the sub-
stantially higher ASME allowable design stresses for stainless
steel pipe compared to those for carbon steel pipe, especially
‘when stainless pipe is supplied as a dual-certified product,
Table Il ASME allowable design stresses (ksi)
Temperature 0-100°F
‘Stainless steel welded pipe
ASTMASI2 Type 904 160
Type 30st 133
Type 316 160
Type 316L 133
Carbon stee! pipe
ASTMAS3 Seamless type A 120
Seamless type B 150
Figure 1 Waste water treatment plant. Canegrat, Italy. Welded type A 102
Welded type B 128
Table! Alloy identification and compositions %
ommon UNS British German Swedish EURONORM
Name NO. BS DIN ss EN c cr WN Mo___Fe
304 $3040 304831 1.4907 2883 1.4901 oe 180=C00 SC
Sod. $30403 S04S11 1.4906 2852 1.4906 003180 100 = Ba
316 $3160 316831401 R711 008 «170-120-2080 Bal.
316L__$31603__316S11_1.4404__—2348_ 1.4404 ogg 170120 2.080 Ba.
Stainless steels in
‘municipal waste water treatment plants‘Typical primary and secondary water reclamation plant
‘lvaded sludge and veking titer
Figure 2 Typical flow diagram for a waste water treatment
plant.
Table Ill_ WWTP environments
thereby allowing the use of the higher design properties
while maintaining the low carbon for weldability.
The low carbon grades, Types 3041 and 316L, are
used for welded construction. These low carbon grades
are designed to be resistant to intergranular corrosion after
‘welding without further heat treatment. The higher carbon
content grades have slightly higher strength and are used
primarily for pump shafts and valve stems where welding
is not involved and the higher strength can be used to ad-
vantage in the design. The Mo containing grades are more
resistant to localized corrosion and are preferred for more
aggressive conditions or simply for greater insurance
against unusual conditions which may exist from time to
time, The cast equivalent grades have comparable corro-
sion resistance and comparable mechanical properties.
WWTP ENVIRONMENTS
Figure 2 shows a typical flow diagram for a waste water
treatment plant, indicating the locations where corrosion
test specimens were exposed to actual plant conditions for
different periods of time. These tests were run in different
Plant Location Flow Rate Feedstock Other Comments
{Municipal Waste Feed NA Raw unreated sewage BOD 175-800ppm Suspended
solids 220-850ppm 0, 140ppm
2. Mixed Feed & Activated Sludge 2-9 fs 70% sowage 30% acve siudge +H. —
8. Aeration Tanks violent agitation 70% sewage 30% active siuige
4. Claes (secondary setters) Low velocity Activated sludge wit some effvent — —
5. Concentrated Active Suge Fairly high = =
6. Vacuum Fier to Disposal No eration 1 fs Activated sudge to vacuum fiter Some enc chloride additions
7. Discharge Effluent 2s moderate aeration — -
8. Sewage Effuent 45 ls extensive aeration Can have high Choride
and dissolved solids
9. Tickle Filter = = aeration high
Tipe roweioe 677.777.
Table 1V_ Corrosion rates in WWTP environments, mpy (mmiyt)
Plant Location Type 304 ‘Type 316 1010 Stee!
4. Municipal Waste Feed <0" (0.002) <0." (<0.002) 30-90 (0.075-0.225)
2. Nixed Feed and Activated Studge <1 (<0.002) <1 (£0,002) 48 (ot)
3. Aeration Tanks <0 (0.002) <0:1 (0.002) 15-50 (0.087-0.127)
4. Clair (secondary setters) <1" (0,002) <1 (0,002) 30- 64° (0.075-0.162)
5. Concentrated Active Sludge <4" (€0.002) <0. (<0,002) 4a (0.122)
6. Vacuum Fiter to Disposal <0.1" (<0.002) it" (0,02) 37- 83 (0.094-0.210)
7. Discharge Effient