Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Darija Turković Dr. Sc. Lovorka Gruić Grmuša The Interpretation of The Novel January 14 2016 Portrayal of Late 19 Century American Society
Darija Turković Dr. Sc. Lovorka Gruić Grmuša The Interpretation of The Novel January 14 2016 Portrayal of Late 19 Century American Society
Darija Turković
Both Henry James and Edith Wharton have in their novels depicted American society
at the end of very influential, but somewhat traditional 19 th century. Not only did they choose
to tackle with the same topic, but also approached it from quite similar point of view. After
reading The Europeans and The Age of Innocence, it becomes perfectly clear that both
authors criticised quite harshly and openly all those rough conventions and norms which
dominated during that period and which people had to obey so as not to jeopardise their
reputation. Reputation was what mattered the most then and losing it, or in any way
damaging it, was considered worse than death. This can be seen in Europeans where James
introduced the theme of snobbery, or to be more precise, hypocrisy when it comes to social
rules and rituals such as arranged marriages, and mocked it in a very subtle way. Wharton
embraced the given template, but dealt with it more stridently. Certain similarities between
two of them can be found in portraying modern and independent woman just as well as
describing the differences between two cultures – European and American. In this essay I
will try to elaborate the above listed notions in greater details and thus prove the
Conventions and rituals of late 19th century American society can perhaps best be seen
through the motif of (arranged) marriage which takes place in both novels. James, when
depicting Gertrude (Mr Wentworth’s younger daughter), clearly demonstrates that back in
that time nobody was allowed to question the tradition. Gertrude, despise being much
Turković 2
younger than Mr Brand, never said anything to prevent that marriage. Not until she met Felix,
her European cousin and future husband, is she capable of looking at the world from a
different point of view. It’s interesting to analyze the social reaction after change in
Gertrude’s perspective. All of the sudden people think of her as frivolous and inconsiderate
person. Her thinking out of the box and neglecting social codes resulted in people calling her
an outsider. That was the way the society functioned back then. You had to follow the rules
blindly without re-examining it or be prepared for an exile. Wharton approached this notion
from another point of view and dealt with it more roughly, showing in that way all the
hypocrisy of American snobbery. This can especially be seen at the very beginning of her
novel or in return of countess Olenska to New York and Newland’s decision to sit next to her
in the Opera house. The whole society looks at her with reprimand and disapproves her
decision to abandon her husband. Throughout the entire novel, each of her motion will be
scrutinized and inspected thoroughly: It was the old New York way of taking life without
effusion of blood, the way of people who dreaded scandal more than disease, who placed
decency above courage and who considered that nothing was more ill-bred than scenes,
except the behaviour of those who gave rise to them. 1 The fact that she has left Europe and
separated from her husband is enough for people making constant prejudice about her, not at
any moment wondering whether that marriage was stable or made her happy. In the eyes of
those people, her future is reduced to the fact that she’ll become someone’s mistress.
Interestingly, adultery was a common trait of the late 19th century American society. Having a
mistress wasn’t considered to be a serious sin, but knowing that the mistress is already
involved in a failed marriage and has her reputation ruined is a completely different story.
May and Newland’s relationship is another issue in this novel. Their marriage is fixed and
Newland, despite the fact he found the love of his life in countess Olenska, isn’t prone to give
up the marriage because he is aware of the destroying effect that would have on his reputation
1
Wharton, Edith. The Age of Innocence. Penguin books, 1996. Page 338.
Turković 3
and future. It’s obvious that these rigid conventions made people lead unhappy lives and
never experiencing a true passion or fulfilment. All that counted was staying within the
boundaries of decency; and once you accomplished that, there was nothing more to worry
about.
Portrayal of a woman from a different and, in terms of 19th century society, somewhat
writing. James described Eugenia as confident and courageous person who doesn’t comply
with social norms and therefore, definitely represents a woman ahead of her age. She is the
European baroness who, after having been separated from her husband, comes to America in
the pursuit of a better life. Although she could have accepted Mr. Acton’s proposal and
eventually settle down, she knows that leading that kind of life wouldn’t satisfy her
capricious spirit. Almost the same situation can be seen in Wharton’s novel. Ellen Olenska
comes to America hoping to find comfort and support in her family and people she was raised
among, but contrary, all she receives is extreme hostility. She is, just like baroness Eugenia,
very sophisticated, intelligent and passionate hence, by no means, adapted to American old-
fashioned way of living. As expected, both of these heroines, after realizing that it is
impossible for them to fit into stiff social conventions they encountered in American society,
return to Europe and try to reassemble their lives there. By portraying the female characters
in such a dominant mode and representing male figures as neglected, passive and mostly
inferior to women, James and Wharton can definitely be considered as the forerunners of
feminism. Their leading heroines can, in the terms of the 19 th century, even be viewed as
femme fatale (especially Madame Olenska) and introducing this sort of figure into the
What is obvious in the above paragraph is the fact that female roles are presented as the
Europeans who can’t seem to be at ease among the Americans. The new issue emerging thus
Turković 4
are the cross-cultural differences between those two mentalities. It’s interesting to analyze the
manners and adjectives authors use when depicting American style of living. James, for
instance, talks about them as reserved and conservative nation which doesn’t know how to
enjoy the beauty of life and takes things way too seriously. The Europeans, on the other hand,
are portrayed as open-minded people who tend to deal with things as they come. In the novel,
that was nicely summed up by Felix (Eugenia’s brother) saying: I have never entertained an
idea. Ideas entertain me; but I am afraid I have never seriously made a plan (...) this is very
frivolous and loose-minded on my part. So it is, but I am like that. 2 Wharton, just like James,
doesn’t hesitate to criticize Americans for their conventionalism. On many occasions she
even goes so far as to mock their way of living (Ellen’s remark of America being a mere copy
of Europe). She is not even afraid to claim that the American girls (like May) are nothing
and grandmothers.3 This clearly proves that, when describing cross-cultural varieties, both
James and Wharton, though being American authors, seem to be more inclined to the
After seeing all of the similarities between James and Wharton, one can’t help noticing that
Wharton was under a huge impact of James’ work. That doesn’t, however, mean that her
work is not as valuable as his. I would say that she embraced his style of writing and took it
to the next, more complex level. By analysing the current situation in the society, position of
a woman within it and cross-cultural differences, both authors have certainly introduced
notable innovations in the literary texts of that time. Undoubtedly, they made a significant
contribution to the American literature and for that reason they are forever to be laudable.
Works cited:
2
James, Henry. The Europeans. Oxford University Press, 1988. Page 77.
3
Wharton, Edith. The Age of Innocence. Penguin books, 1996. Page 43.
Turković 5