Preliminary Geotechnical Report Bridge Savas. Raca-1 PDF

САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ ЦИП д.о.о.
11000 БЕОГРАД, НЕМАЊИНА 6/IV

тел: 011/3618-134, факс: 011/3618-324, web site: www.sicip.co.rs
1.1. TITLE PAGEНАСЛОВНА СТРАНА

Е1/1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
Employer: PE “Roads of Serbia”
Bulevar Kralja Aleksandra 282, Belgrade
Project: Bridge over the Sava River on Kuzmin – Sremska Rača
Highway, in the part from km 16+587.95 to 17+910.37,
construction parcels No.: 764, 982/10, 935, 936, 718/1, 718/2,
722/1, 722/3, 982/2, 982/8, 736/3 and 989, LRU Sremska Rača
– Sremska Mitrovica City
Type of technical documents: Preliminary Design IDP
Name and designation of design part: Е1/1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT -

GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
BRIDGE OVER THE SAVA RIVER IN SREMSKA RAČA
For construction / work execution: New construction with possibility of construction in phases
Seal and signature: Designer:

Institute of Transportation CIP Ltd.
Belgrade, Nemanjina 6/ IV
General Manager: Milutin Ignjatović, Graduate Eng.
Responsible design engineer:

Seal and signature:
Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate, Geol.Eng.
391 М042 13
No. of technical documents: 740 – 2/18

Place and date: Belgrade, 2019
САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ ЦИП д.о.о
Немањина 6/IV, 11000 Београд
1.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1. Title Page

1.2. Table of Contents
1.3. Decision on Appointment of Responsible Design Engineer
1.4. Statement of Responsible Design Engineer
1.5. Textual Documents
1.6. Graphic Documents
1.7 Numerical Documents
1.8 Report on Geophysical Investigations
1.3. DECISION ON APPOINTMENT OF RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER
Pursuant to Article 128 of the Law on Planning and Construction (“Official Gazette of the Republic
of Serbia” No. 72/09, 81/09-corection, 64/10-Decision of Constitutional Court, 24/11, 121/12, 42/13-
Decision of Constitutional Court, 50/13-Decision of Constitutional Court, 98/13-Decision of
Constitutional Court, 132/14, 145/14 and 83/2018 and 31/19) and provision of the Rulebook on the
content, method, and procedure of preparing and the manner of conducting control of technical
documentation depending on the class and designated purpose of the facility (“Official Gazette of
the Republic of Serbia” No. 72/2018) the following person is appointed as the
RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER
For the preparation of Geotechnical Report – Geotechnical Conditions for Construction of Bridge
over the Sava River in Sremska Rača, which is a part of the Preliminary Design (IDP) of the Bridge
over the Sava River on Kuzmin – Sremska Rača Highway, in the part from km 16+587.95 to
17+910.37, construction parcels No. 764, 982/10, 935, 936, 718/1, 718/2, 722/1, 722/3, 982/2, 982/8,
736/3 и 989, LRU Sremska Rača – Sremska Mitrovica City:
Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng. 391 М042 13
Designer: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP Ltd.,

Belgrade, Nemanjina 6/IV
Responsible person/representative: General Manager: Milutin Ignjatović, Graduate Eng.

Seal: Signature:

1.4. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER
The responsible design engineer for the preparation of the Geotechnical Report – Geotechnical
Conditions for Construction of Bridge over the Sava River in Sremska Rača, which is a part of the
Preliminary Design (IDP) of the Bridge over the Sava River on Kuzmin – Sremska Rača Highway, in
the part from km 16+587.95 to 17+910.37, construction parcels No. 764, 982/10, 935, 936, 718/1,
718/2, 722/1, 722/3, 982/2, 982/8, 736/3 и 989, LRU Sremska Rača – Sremska Mitrovica City
Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng.
I hereby S T A T E
1. That the Report was prepared in line with the Law on Mining and Geological Explorations (Official
Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 101/15), Rulebook on the Contents of Geological
Exploration Designs and Studies on Results of Geological Explorations and the Rulebook on the
Required Extent of Study of Engineering-Geological Properties of the Ground for Planning,
Designing and Construction Purposes (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 51/96);
2. That the Report was prepared in line with the Law on Planning and Construction, regulations,
standards and conditions governing construction and good engineering practice;
3. That in preparing of the Report, all prescribed and stipulated measures and recommendations for
the fulfilment of the basic requirements for the structure were abided by and that the design was
prepared in accordance with the measures and recommendations confirming fulfilment of the
basic requirements.
Responsible Design Engineer: Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng.

Licence No.: 391 М042 13
Seal: Signature:

1.5. TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1
2 TYPE AND SCOPE OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS .............................. 2
2.1 Previous Investigation Works ........................................................................................... 2
2.2 Investigation Works ..........................................................................................................3
2.2.1 Engineering-Geological Mapping in Wide Zone of the Structure.................................3
2.2.2 Exploratory Drilling and Engineering-Geological Mapping of Borehole Cores ............. 3
2.2.3 Standard Penetration Tests – SPT .............................................................................5
2.2.4 Cone Penetration Tests – СPT................................................................................... 5
2.2.5 Laboratory Gomechanical Tests ................................................................................. 8
2.2.6 Geophysical and Seismic Investigations..................................................................... 9
2.2.7 Chemical Analysis of Water and Assessment of Aggressiveness to Concrete ........... 9
3 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS ...................................................................9
3.1 Geomorphologic Features ................................................................................................ 9
3.2 Geological Composition of the Ground ........................................................................... 10
3.3 Hydrogeological Properties of the Ground ...................................................................... 11
3.4 Geotechnical Properties of the Ground........................................................................... 11
3.5 Seismic Properties of the Ground ................................................................................... 20
4 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF STRUCTURE FOUNDATION ................................... 24
4.1 Applied Methods of Geostatic Calculations .................................................................... 25
4.2 Results of Geostatic Calculations ................................................................................... 26
5 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF FILL CONSTRUCTION............................................. 32
5.1 Methods Applied to Geostatic Calculations .................................................................... 32
5.2 Results of Geostatic Calculations ................................................................................... 32
6 General Geotechnical Recommendations .......................................................................... 35
6.1 General Geotechnical Recommendations for Subsoil Treatment.................................... 35
6.2 General Geotechnical Recommendations for Fill Construction ....................................... 36
7 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................... 39
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX NO. NAME

1. Engineering-Geological Map Showing Locations of Investigation Works
2. Geotechnical Sections of the Ground
3. Exploratory Borehole Sections
4. Diagrams and Results of CPT and CPTU
5. Overview of Results of Laboratory Tests of Soil
6. Chemical Analysis of Water and Assessed Aggressiveness to Concrete
1 INTRODUCTION
In line with the Contract No. 730-2/18 of 29.10.2018, signed with the Employer "TASYAPI INSAAT
TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET", Belgrade Branch, the Institute of Transportation CIP – Department
of Geotechnical Engineering assumed the obligation to prepare a Geotechnical Report for the
Preliminary Design of construction of a bridge over the Sava River in Sremska Rača. A bridge of the
highway section shall be constructed at the subject location for the purpose of connecting the Republic
of Serbia and the Republic of Srpska.
A bridge with the main structure length of around 332.0 m and width of around 31.0 m, and with four
travel lanes and two emergency lanes, i.e. three lanes in each direction, shall be constructed at the
subject location. According to the bridge structure design, the main bridge structure shall rest on four
piers (S13, S14, S15 and S16), which shall transfer structure load to the ground. Out of the four
designed piers, two shall be located on the Sava riverbanks and two in the riverbed. The spacing
between the piers of the main bridge structure shall be 90 m i.e. 150 m in the riverbed. The bridge
approach structures shall rest on the total of 21 piers with the spacing of 41-67.5 m.
The textual part of this report contains an analysis of field investigation results and comments on the
laboratory tests of soils samples. Geotechnical conditions of construction are presented in a separate
chapter.
Figure 1: Position of Future Bridge with Approach Structures (source: Google Maps)
This report describes in detail the results of completed geotechnical investigations of the ground and
provides assessments necessary for the proposed solution of the future construction. The
geotechnical investigations of the ground in the zone of the future structure were carried out in
February and March 2019. The objective of these investigations was to explore, document and
analyse the engineering-geological and geotechnical conditions of the ground in the investigation
area.
Based on the completed investigation works, recommendations for designing and construction as well
as for the manners of the future structure foundation were given.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 1

The report contains results of field geotechnical investigations, interpretations of geotechnical ground
sections and determined parameters of physical-mechanical and stress-strain properties of identified
geotechnical media required for designing and construction of the subject structures, as well as
adequate conclusions and recommendations.
Graphic documents include a layout showing completed investigation works and results of
engineering-geological mapping of the ground and sections showing engineering-geological units.
Results of field and laboratory tests are presented in the form of mapped sections and records.
The Geotechnical Report was prepared in line with the following:
 Law on Mining and Geological Explorations (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No.
101/2015),
 Rulebook on the Contents of Geological Exploration Designs and Studies on Results of
Geological Explorations (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No. 51/96),
 Rulebook on the Required Extent of Study of Engineering-Geological Properties of the
Ground for Planning, Designing and Construction Purposes (Official Gazette of the Republic
of Serbia No.51/96),
 Rulebook on the Contents of Documents Related to Hydrogeological and Engineering-
Geological Input for Construction of Large Dams, Hydropower Plants, Thermal Power Plants
and Transport Infrastructure Facilities (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia No.51/96),
 Appurtenant valid legislation, conditions and enactments.
2 TYPE AND SCOPE OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS
2.1 Previous Investigation Works

For the purpose of determining the extent to which the ground in the subject section has been studied,
results of investigations carried out both at the subject location and in its near vicinity were analysed.
Based on the analysis of results of the previous investigations, it was concluded that the subject
location had already been investigated for the purpose of preparing planning documents for various
levels of designing and for various contents.
In preparing this Report, geological-geotechnical documents (Table 1) were used for the evaluation
of the ground as a work medium. However, time lap from the preparation of the planning documents
should be taken into account.
In order to prepare this Report, available data were partly reinterpreted. Results of these investigations
are presented in the following planning documents:
Table 1: List of Used Documents
No. Name of Document Year
Geological Investigations for Preparation of Report on
1 Geotechnical Conditions for Possibilities of Separating Road and 2005
Railway Bridge in Sremska Rača (Institute of Transportation CIP)
Basic Geological Maps and Explanatory Texts of Sheets Bačka
Palanka and Bijeljina, Scale 1:100 000 and Appurtenant
2 1992
Manuscripts in the Scale of 1:25 000, issue of Federal Geological
Association, Belgrade
Seismological Maps of Yugoslavia, Scale 1:1000000, for Return
3 Periods of 50, 100, 200, 500 and 1000 Years, Seismological 1987
Association of SFR Yugoslavia – Belgrade
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 2

2.2 Investigation Works

The investigation works carried out in March 2019 included the following:
 Engineering-geological mapping of the ground in the wide zone of the structure;
 Exploratory drilling and engineering-geological mapping of borehole cores;
 Standard penetration tests – SPT;
 Cone penetration tests – СPT;
 Geophysical and seismic investigations;
 Laboratory geomechanical tests;
 Laboratory analyses of water aggressiveness and chemism.
2.2.1 Engineering-Geological Mapping in Wide Zone of the Structure
A detailed engineering-geological mapping of the ground was performed in the area of geodetically
surveyed layout of the terrain – scale 1:1000, zone of around 400x2000 m.
The composition and properties of the ground were determined visually and thicknesses of surface
covers were assessed. The main data about the age of identified geological media, regional geological
composition and textural-structural properties were taken from the basic geological maps in the scale
of 1:100.000, Sheets Bačka Palanka and Bijeljina.
Man-made ground was identified in the zone of infrastructure facilities.
During executions of the investigation works, the engineering-geological map was modified by
including data obtained by the subject investigation works.
The prepared engineering-geological map with investigation details served as the main engineering-
geological and geotechnical model for further analyses.
Detailed geotechnical mapping of the ground was performed in the total area of around 8 ha. Details
of ground mapping are given in Annex No. 1.
2.2.2 Exploratory Drilling and Engineering-Geological Mapping of Borehole Cores
For the purpose of designing the new overpass, exploratory drilling was performed in order to
determine lithological composition, properties and spatial position of lithological members in the
ground composition, as well as groundwater presence and levels.
The locations and scope of exploratory boreholes were based on the Terms of Reference for this level
of designing, extent to which the terrain had been studied – previous investigations and accessibility
of the locations.
During execution of investigation works, exploratory boreholes could not be drilled on the right Sava
riverbank. The terrain in the zone of the access road leading from the existing arterial road to the end
of the section is overgrown with thick forest, which prevented access of drilling rigs and equipment.
Exploratory drilling with continuous coring was performed by using mechanical drilling rigs. It involved
rotary and “dry” drilling i.e. without using drilling fluid, in order to register water emergence and levels
in boreholes. The drilling dimeter ranged from 146 mm to 101 mm.
During the engineering-geological core mapping, geological composition of the ground (structure and
pattern) was determined i.e. various lithogenetic members were identified and structural-textual
properties of identified members were determined. Apart from that, presence and degree of physical-
chemical alteration, presence of secondary impurities and changes of water content, plasticity and
colour within identified lithogenetic members were determined as well.
After photographing and core mapping, samples were taken for laboratory geomechanical tests.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 3

The geotechnical model of the ground at characteristic cross sections was developed based on data
from the boreholes drilled for the subject structure.
The total of 13 exploratory boreholes were drilled to the depth of 22.0-40.0 m. Table 2 shows basic
technical data about the boreholes.
Results of core mapping are presented on the borehole sections given in annex No. 3.
The locations of exploratory boreholes are indicated on the engineering-geological map given in
Annex No. 1.
Table 2: Basic Technical Data about Exploratory Boreholes
Groundwater
Depth Elevation Coordinates
No. Designation Depth
(m) (masl) X Y (m)
1. C-3 24.0 80.11 6603022 4975654 4.2
2. C-5 24.0 80.19 6602985 4975581 4.3
3. C-7 24.2 80.30 6602960 4975518 3.8
4. C-9 22.0 80.48 6602928 4975418 3.8
5. C-11 26.0 79.43 6602938.5 4975344.0 3.0
6. C-12 24.0 81.16 6602903 4975288 3.5
7. C-15 25.0 80.29 6602891.5 4975131.6 3.5
8. C-17 25.0 80.80 6602892 4975019 4.2
9. C-19 40.0 80.23 6602877 4974925.5 4.2
10. C-20 30.0 74.72 6602882 4974800 -3.5
11. C-21 30.0 74.72 6602882 4974648 -3.4
12. C-22 30.0 80.35 6602878.4 4974563.4 4.7
13. C-24 25.0 80.1 6602872.7 4974464.4 4.9
Figure 2: Drilling Rig at the Location of Future Bridge Pier

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 4
2.2.3 Standard Penetration Tests – SPT

Standard penetration tests in boreholes were performed in accordance with the standard BS 1377-9
– Determination of the penetration resistance using the split-barrel sampler (the standard penetration
test SPT). The tests were performed by using a standard cone. The total of 50 SPTs was performed.
Disturbed samples were taken from the test zones for laboratory identification. The number of blows
counted by using standard cone was corrected by applying the following relation N=0.75N; N -
number of blows for penetration tube and N – number of blows for cone.
The relation with resistance to cone penetration from SPT gave the approximate values of constrained
modulus (Mv).
In the standard penetration test – SPT, constrained modulus was determined by applying the following
relation:
Mv = Nx Rsp x P,
Where:
- Mv - constrained modulus
- N - number of slide hammer blows
- Rsp - 800 kN/m2 specific resistance to one blow
- P - empirical parameters depending on the type of material (0.1–2)
Table 3: Values of Empirical Parameter P and Dependence on Material Type

USC Soil P
Classification Limit Values Mean Values
GW, GP 1.5 – 2.0 >2
SW 1.5 – 2.0 1.75
SP 1.0 – 1.5 1.25
SM, SC 0.8 – 1.2 1
ML 0.5 – 0.8 0.75
CL 0.2 – 0.5 0.5
CH 0.2 – 0.3 0.25
OH 0.1 – 0.2 0.15
Undrained shearing strength of coherent soil from SPT tests was assessed based on the formula
proposed by Prof. Maksimović:
Cu=5 up to 7xN for N>5 Cu=5+7.5N for N<5
The total of 52 tests were performed and the depth and the number of slide hammer blows for the
SPTs are presented in the exploratory borehole logs given in Annex No. 4.
2.2.4 Cone Penetration Tests – СPT

For the purpose of determining stress-strain properties of the ground, in situ cone penetration tests
(CPT) were performed in accordance with SRPS.U.B1.031 and SRPS EN ISO 22476-12 standards.
Static penetrometer with friction cone with the capacity of 200 kN was used for the tests. Total of eleven
CPTs were performed to the depths of 11.0-21.8 m. Table 4 below shows the most important
characteristics of completed CPTs.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 5

Table 4: Basic Technical Data about Cone Penetration Tests (CPT)

Depth Elevation Coordinates
No. Designation
(m) (masl) x
1. CPT-S 4 17.60 80.12 6603005.01 4975621.52
2. CPT-S 6 17.00 80.23 6602973.32 4975549.71
3. CPT-S 8 14.0 80.33 6602944.32 4975477.00
4. CPT-S 10 17.00 80.47 6602922.84 4975400.00
5. CPT-S 13 20.60 79.95 6602895.43 4975231.12
6. CPT-S 14 18.20 80.15 6602892.83 4975170.19
7. CPT-S 16 14.80 80.32 6602887.69 4975075.95
8. CPT-S 18 12.80 80.82 6602884.70 4974964.88
9. CPT-S 19 21.8 80.23 6602878.06 4974924.95
10. CPT-S 22 11.8 80.21 6602880.53 4974566.35
11. CPT-S 24 11.0 80.51 6602872.65 4974465.05
Stress and strain properties of identified lithological members were determined based on
measurement of cone resistance (kN/m2) and friction ratio Rf (%) and their correlation with the data
obtained by exploratory drilling data and laboratory tests.
The strain properties – odometer constrained modulus – were determined by applying the correlation
given in EN 1997-2:2007 Eurocode 7 – Geotechnical Design. Ground Investigation and Testing:
Еoed = axqc
Where a is a correlation factor that depends on local experience. The values of this coefficient were
adjusted to the recommendations given in Annex D to Eurocode 7, as presented in Table 5 below.
Shearing strength parameters ’(o) and cu (kN/m2) were determined from the correlation diagram “The
Interpretation of Begemann friction jacket cone results to give soil types and design parameters” - I.W.
Searle – published in the Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, Brighton, UK, September 1979 – Figure No. 3 and diagrams proposed by Robertson and
Campenella – 1983 – Figure No. 4.
Results of test measurements are presented in Annex No. 4 and their spatial positions in Annex No.
1.
Table 5: Values of Coefficient α, Sanglerat, 1972
Cone Resistance
Soil Type α
qc (MPa)
qc ≤ 0,7 3–8
CL – low-plasticity clay 0,7 < qc < 2 2–5
qc ≥ 2 1 – 2.5
qc < 2 3–6
ML – low-plasticity silt
qc ≥ 2 1–2
CH – high-plasticity clay and qc < 2 2–6
MH – high-plasticity silt qc ≥ 2 1–2
OL – organic silt < 1.2 2–8
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 6

Cone Resistance
Soil Type α
qc (MPa)
qc < 0,7
Pt, OH – peat and organic high-

50 < ω ≤ 100 1.5 – 4
plasticity clay
100 < ω ≤ 200 1 – 1.5
ω > 300 < 0.4
2 < qc ≤ 3 2–4
Chalk – soft carbonate rock
qc > 3 1.5 – 3
qc < 5 2
Sand
qc > 10 1.5
Figure 3: Proposed Interpretation Diagram for Normal Soil Types
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 7

Figure 4: Diagram for Determination of Internal Friction Angle (’) through Cone Resistance (qc)
from CPT, (Robertson and Campenella – 1983)
Values of undrained strength were additionally checked by applying the following relation:
𝑞 −𝑝
𝑐 =
𝑁
Where:
cu - undrained strength
qc - minimum value of static cone penetrometer resistance
p0 - geostatic pressure
Nk - correction factor (in the range of 10-20)
2.2.5 Laboratory Gomechanical Tests
For the purpose of determining physical-mechanical and stress-strain properties of identified
geotechnical media, the following laboratory geomechanical tests were performed on the selected soil
samples taken from exploratory boreholes. All tests were performed in accordance with SRPS
standards by the geomechanical laboratory of Geomehanika LLC, Belgrade.
The total of 66 samples were selected for performing the following tests:
Determination of identification-classification parameters:

Water content SRPS U. B1. 012 66 tests
Unit weight of soil SRPS U. B1. 013 22 tests
Grain-size distribution SRPS U. B1. 018 66 tests
Soil consistency SRPS U. B1. 020 22 tests
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 8

Determination of soil deformability and shearing strength parameters

Oedometer compressibility and consolidation SRPS U. B1. 032 21 tests
Soil resistance during direct shear test SRPS U. B1. 028 19 tests
Results of laboratory tests of samples are given in Annex No. 5.
2.2.6 Geophysical and Seismic Investigations

Geophysical investigations involved the following:
- Determination of depths and velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs waves;
- Determination of surface complex thickness;
- Determination of spatial distribution and of bedding depth of particular lithological members.
Refraction seismic investigations covered micro-location of the future bridge for the purpose of
determining velocities of elastic longitudinal and transversal waves and geodynamic ground model in
order to determine engineering parameters of seismicity and stress-strain parameters. Two refraction
profiles were implemented (PR-5 and PR-6) on each Sava riverbank, with the respective lengths of
144 m. The refraction profiles were arranged in the zones of bank piers of the future bridge. Seismic
measurements were made by using GEODE – Geometrix 12-channel seismic device with geophone
SM-4 up to 10 Hz. The positions of the seismic profiles are presented on the engineering-geological
map given in Annex No. 1.
Based on the above investigations, seismic design parameters were determined for the bridge over
the Sava River.
A report on the geophysical investigations and interpretation of results was prepared by “Geophysical
Engineering”, Belgrade, and it is given as a separate report in Chapter No. 1.8.
2.2.7 Chemical Analysis of Water and Assessment of Aggressiveness to Concrete

Laboratory analyses were performed by the certified laboratory of the Institute of Public Health of
Vojvodina by applying the methods defined in the valid standards. The results are presented in Annex
No. 2.
3 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS
3.1 Geomorphologic Features

The future structure shall be located in the immediate vicinity of the Sava riverbank, in its floodplain,
with the average ground elevations of 79.0–81.0 masl. Morphologically, the entire area is
subhorizontal and it is the floodplain of the Sava River. Out of morphological forms, embankments/fills
and the Sava riverbed are clearly distinguishable. The wide investigation area contains a quite ramified
hydrographic network of amelioration and drainage canals that belong to the Sava watershed. The
highest morphological forms that dominate the terrain are the fills of Šid-Bijeljina railway line and
regional road and the Sava flood control embankment with the average ground elevations of 81.0–
86.0 masl. The lowest morphological form is the Sava riverbed with the elevations of 74.0–78.0 masl.
In the past, this terrain was frequently flooded, with periodical ponding.
The investigation area covering around 80 ha is in general of rectangular form, with the width of around
400m and length of around 2000m.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 9

3.2 Geological Composition of the Ground

The results of the latest investigations confirmed the general geological composition of the ground in
the investigation area. It comprises alluvial sediments and man-made deposits.
Filled Ground (n)
Filled ground refers to Šid-Bijeljina railway line roadbed, Šid - Sremska Rača - border with the Republic
of Srpska, local roads, border crossing point in Sremska Rača and the Sava flood control
embankments. These are mostly clayey, silty and sandy materials originating from local borrow areas.
Alluvial sediments (a) are represented by various types:
- Alluvial-flood sediments – flood facies (ap)
- Riverbed sediments – riverbed facies (ak)
Alluvial-Flood Sediments – Flood Facies (ap)

In the alluvial-flood facies, three mapped units were identified based on their lithological
characteristics, which result from sedimentation energy effect: sands and sandy siltstones, sandy
siltstones and siltstone sands and siltstones with carbonate concretions. These sediments often
irregularly alternate laterally and vertically. The alluvial-flood sediments stretch in the immediate
vicinity of the Sava, Bosut, Studva and Drina river courses. They are formed during outflows of these
watercourses from their beds. Compared to riverbed sediments that lie underneath, they are
characterised by fine-grained, small lenticular laminations, horizontal stratification, presence of
wetland-terrestrial fauna and high content of CaC03. The grain-size distribution of flood sediments
depends on their distance from the riverbed (the largest particles settle closer to the riverbed and fine
particles reach distant areas). The thickness of the alluvial-flood sediments ranges from 10-12 m.
Riverbed Sediments - Riverbed Facies (ak)
In the alluvial-riverbed facies, two mapped units were identified based on their lithological
characteristics, which result from sedimentation energy effect: sands and silty sandy gravels. The
sediments of this facies often alternate irregularly in horizontal and vertical direction. The alluvial-
riverbed sediments stretch in the immediate vicinity of the Sava river course. They are formed by
sedimentation of coarse-grained fluvial material in river courses and represent the present of
abandoned riverbeds.
Wetland Sediments (b)
Recent depressions are the locations where sediments are deposited: siltstones, clay and mud with
more or less organogenic detritus. They have developed within the floodplains of the Sava, Bosut and
Studva rivers and their tributaries. They have mostly accumulated in old meanders of the former Sava,
Bosut and Studva watercourses, with wetland vegetation and pond water. Their water level always
depends on the levels of flowing waters and groundwater. Predominance of particular lithological
components depends on the extent of communication between the wetland and the surrounding
waters. By the type, forest wetlands with a high percentage of organogenic fraction are dominant, with
typical representatives of gastropod fauna: Planorbis planorbis, Lymnea stagnalis, Planorbis corneus,
etc.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 10

Location of future bridge
Figure 5: Segment of Basic Geological Map – Sheet Bijeljina, 1:100 000
3.3 Hydrogeological Properties of the Ground

Hydrogeological properties of the ground in the wide investigation area are given in general through
general properties of the terrain and they are based on the properties of lithological members, porosity
types and main infiltration parameters, water quantity, recharge, accumulation and manner of water
discharge. In that way, main hydrogeological complexes were assessed in general.
Hydrogeological categories of the ground were identified based on hydrogeological properties of rock
masses, porosity types and main infiltration parameters.
Water-bearing media were registered in Quaternary (alluvial) deposits of the Sava River, where
sediments with intergranular porosity are present. These alluvial sediments (sands, gravels) contain
confined aquifers with free water table or aquifers under low pressure.
In addition to differences in infiltration characteristics and yields of aquifers in the above-mentioned
media, conditions of recharge, drainage and protection against pollution also differ. Conditions of
aquifer recharge in alluvial deposits depend on the hydraulic connection between the rivers and
aquifers and to smaller extent on the inflow from the hinterland and precipitation infiltration. In the
course of drilling, water level in the alluvion was registered at the depth of around 3-5 m, at the
absolute elevation of around 75.0-76.0 masl. With the exception of wells for individual water supply,
there are no data about the presence of large water intakes or facilities for organised water supply
from alluvial deposits in the zone of the subject structure route.
Conditions of aquifer water protection against pollution primarily refer to the preservation of river water
quality and then the quality waters in hypsometrically higher parts of the terrain in the hinterland.
Aquifer discharge involves outflow to hypsometrically lower parts of the ground, evapotranspiration
and individual water supply.
3.4 Geotechnical Properties of the Ground

This chapter presents individual geotechnical units of the ground in the area of the newly designed
bridge.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 11

The properties of geotechnical units identified in the natural ground structure were analysed and
presented based on all performed investigations and tests.
The following geotechnical units were identified:
Recent Ground
 Man-made ground - n
Alluvial Sediments
Flood Facies
 Silty-sandy clay – flood facies – apg,pr
 Sandy-muddy silt – flood facies – appr,p,m
 Silty sand – flood facies – app,pr
Riverbed Facies
 Sand - riverbed facies – akp
 Silty-sandy gravel – riverbed facies – akš,
Recent Ground
Man-made ground – (n) within roads, railway line and the Sava River flood control embankments are
of heterogeneous composition. Fills of roadbeds consist of clayey silt and dredged sand and finishing
layers – subgrade consist of gravel. They have been technically developed and consolidated. The Sava
flood control embankments consist of clayey silt of alluvial origin from local borrow areas and they have
also been technically developed.
Geotechnical investigations and tests were not performed in this identified medium because these
recent formations are related to the existing linear structures where significant geotechnical works are
not envisaged.
According to GN-200, it belongs to Category II.

Based on previous tests and engineering assessment, the following values of physical-mechanical
properties are proposed:
 Unit weight
o In natural condition  17.0 - 18.0 kN/m3
 Shearing strength parameters:

o Internal friction angle ' 20-28°
o Cohesion с' 0-10 kN/m2
Alluvial Sediments – Flood Facies – (ap)
Silty-sandy clay (apg,pr) is the flood facies of alluvial sediments; it is yellow in colour, of medium to
hard plastic consistency, medium plasticity and medium to low compressibility. This medium is in
general of laminar texture and out of secondary impurities, around 1-2 cm large sporadic CaCO3
concretions were registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust. In general,
this medium is of intergranular to fracture porosity and of medium to low water-permeability. It contains
to smaller extent fossil remains of bivalves and gastropods. It was registered as a continuous layer
with the thickness ranging from 4.0 to 6.8 m.
According to USCS it belongs to CL group. According to GN-200, it belongs to Category II.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 12

Laboratory tests of samples taken from this medium gave the following values of physical-mechanical
properties:
 Percentages of individual fractions in the grain-size distribution are as follows:
o Gravel 0 - 1%
o Sand 2 - 23%
o Silt 72 - 89%
o Clay 3 - 13%
The following values of water content and consistency limits and indexes were obtained:
 Water content w = 20-30%
 Liquid limit wL = 32-46%
 Plasticity limit wP = 21-26 %
 Plasticity index IP = 11-20%
 Consistency index IC = 0.34-1.09
 Unit weight
o Natural  19.3-20.9kN/m3
o Dry d 14.85-17.03 kN/m3
Under conditions of direct shear:
 Permeability coefficient:
o Hazen Kf=1.65X10-8- 5.74X10-6 cm/s
o USBR Kf=2.28X10-6 -2.84X10-5 cm/s
 Constrained modulus
o For the load of 50 - 100 kPa Mv= 2384- 9027 kPa
o For the load of 100 - 200 kPa Mv= 3906-10395 kPa
Geophysical-seismic investigations gave the following parameters:
Table 6: Soil Parameters Calculated Based on Geophysical Investigations

Measured Values Calculated Elastic Parameter Values of Lithological
Members
Medium Vp Vs µ  Edin G Edef
(m/s) (m/s) (Kg/m3) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
apg,pr 0.3-0.4 0.15-0.2 0.33 1.85-1.90 111-203 42-76 11-18
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 13

Figure 5: Silty-Sandy Clay Registered in Borehole С-12
The stress-strain properties of silty-sandy clay determined based on in situ tests (SPT and CPT) are
as follows:
Table 7: Stress-Strain Properties Determined Based on CPT and SPT

In Situ Tests
(SPT) (CPT)
Medium
N' Mv Cu qc Mv Cu
(MPa) (kPa) (MPa) (kPa)
g,pr
ap 7.5 -13.5 3.0 – 5.4 35-65 1.5 – 2.5 3.3- 6.2 40-60
Based on completed tests and engineering assessment, the following referent parameters of this
medium are recommended for geostatic calculations:
 Unit weight g(g’) = 19.5 (10) kN/m3
 Internal friction angle f' = 20°
 Cohesion c' = 15 kPa
 Constrained modulus Mv = 5 000 kPа
Sandy-muddy silt – (appr,p,m) was registered as a continuous layer with the thickness from 1.2 to 4.4
m. This medium is grey in colour, easily squeezable, sticky, of very soft consistency, low plasticity and
high to exceptional compressibility. It is of laminar texture with silt and silty sand laminas alternating
irregularly in the horizontal and vertical direction. In general, silty fraction dominates over sand in this
medium. The thickness of laminas is small, ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 cm. Out of secondary impurities,
small fossilised remains of river flora and fauna were registered in the form of fossilised remains of
plants and small inclusions of bivalves and gastropods. The medium is intensively moistened and
water-saturated, of intergranular type of porosity.
According to USCS, it belongs to ML-MH-CL group. According to GN-200, it belongs to Category II-
III.
properties:
o Gravel 0%
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 14
o Sand 1.7-44.7%
o Silt 53-85%
o Clay 2.2-20.4%
 Liquid limit wL = 35-58%
 Plasticity limit wP = 21.6-33.5 %
 Plasticity index IP = 11.8-25.4%
 Consistency index IC = 0.11-0.83
 Unit weight
o Natural  17.4-20.5kN/m3
o Dry d 12.27-16.99 kN/m3
Under conditions of direct shear:
o Hazen Kf=2.80X10-7- 4.10X10-5 cm/s
o USBR Kf=2.08X10-6 -7.71X10-5 cm/s
 Constrained modulus

Members
appr,p,m 0.3-0.4 0.15-0.2 0.33 1.85-1.90 111-203 42-76 11-18
Figure 6: Sandy-Muddy Silt Registered in Borehole С-17
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 15

The stress-strain properties of sandy-muddy silt determined based on in situ tests (SPT and CPT) are
as follows:

In Situ Tests
(SPT) (CPT)
Medium
N' Mv Cu qc Mv Cu
(MPa) (kPa) (MPa) (kPa)
pr,p,m
ap 2 -9 1.2 – 3.6 20-45 0.7 – 1.6 1.4- 3.2 20-40
 Constrained modulus Mv = 2 800 kPa
Silty sand – (app,pr) silty sand, grey in colour, of medium to small density and well graded. This
medium is in general of laminar texture with sand laminas irregularly alternating with thin and
sporadic silt laminas in horizontal and vertical direction. Sand dominates over silt, which is
present to much smaller extent in the mass. The sand is of intergranular porosity, water-
permeable and water-saturated. It was registered as a continuous layer with the thickness
ranging from 1.1 to 6.7 m. Interbeds and laminas of clayed silt are around 10 cm thick, they are of
soft to medium plastic consistency, low to medium plasticity and medium to high compressibility.
According to USCS, it belongs to ML-SC-SM group. According to GN-200, it belongs to Category II.
properties:
o Gravel 0%
o Sand 48- 99%
o Silt 0 - 44%
o Clay 6.7%
 Water content w = 22 - 30%
o Hazen Kf=9.01X10-6- 5.43X10-3 cm/s
o USBR Kf=1.65X10-5 -1.17X10-2 cm/s

Medium Members
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 16

Vp Vs µ  Edin G Edef

app,pr 1.1-1.2 0.35-0.4 0.44 1.90-1.95 709-866 233-312 45-57
Figure 7: Silty Sand Registered in Borehole С-12

The stress-strain properties of silty sand determined based on in situ tests (SPT and CPT) are as
follows:

In Situ Tests
(SPT) (CPT)
Medium
N' Mv  qc Mv 
(MPa) (0) (MPa) (0)
app,pr 6-23 7.2– 18.4 28-32 2.5 – 7.5 5.0- 15.0 30-32
Alluvial Sediments – Riverbed Facies – (ak)
Песак – (aкp) was registered in the form of interbeds and lenses of large dimensions and thickness
ranging from 1.0 to 3.3 m. It contains fractions of fine-grained and coarse-grained sand with a small
content of silt and sporadic fine-grained gravel. The sand is grey in colour and of medium density. It
has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly graded, of intergranual porosity and water-saturated.
According to USCS, it belongs to SC-SM-SP-SW group. According to GN-200, it belongs to Category
II-III.
properties:
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 17


o Gravel 0-28%
o Sand 70-99%
o Silt 1.65-3.4%
o Clay 0%
o Hazen Kf=1.96X10-4- 1.61 cm/s
o USBR Kf=1.47X10-4 -1.48X10-1 cm/s

Members
app 1.6-1.7 0.45-0.60 0.43-0.46 1.95-2.00 1080-2030 395-720 69-111
Figure 8: Песак регистрован у бушотини С-24

The stress-strain properties of sand determined based on in situ tests (SPT and CPT) are as follows:

In Situ Tests
(SPT) (CPT)
Medium
N' Mv  qc Mv 
(MPa) (0) (MPa) (0)
akp 22-23 21.0-23.0 32-34 7.0 – 15.0 14.0- 22.5 34-36
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 18
Silty-sandy gravel – (akš,p) it was registered as a continuous layer with the thickness over 40.0 m i.e.
stretching to the depth of executed investigation works. It contains fractions of coarse-grained sand
and fine-grained gravel. Gravel grains are of various petrographic origin, they are rounded to semi-
rounded, with the size of 1-3 cm and with somewhat larger grains of 3-6 cm. In general, it lies at the
depths from 20.0 to 22.0 m. The gravel has somewhat larger grans of 3-6 cm. This is a heterogeneous
medium with dominating sands and gravel that alternate as deposits and with the interspace filled with
sandy silt. This medium is grey in colour, water-saturated, of intergranular porosity, well-graded and
of medium to high density.
According to USCS, it belongs to SM group. According to GN-200, it belongs to Category II-III.
Laboratory tests of samples taken from this medium and previous tests and engineering assessments
gave the following values of physical-mechanical properties:
o Gravel 30-79%
o Sand 15-55%
o Silt 0-20%
o Clay 0-6%
 Water content w = 3.5-9.8%

Members
app,pr 1.6-1.7 0.45-0.60 0.43-0.46 1.95-2.00 1080-2030 395-720 69-111
Figure 9: Silty-Sandy Gravel Registered in Borehole С-20
The stress-strain properties of silty-sandy gravel determined based on in situ tests (SPT and CPT)
are as follows:
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 19

In Situ Tests
(SPT) (CPT)
Medium
N' Mv  qc Mv 
(MPa) (0) (MPa) (0)
akš,p 19-65 30.4-78.0 38-40 25.0 – 50.0 37.5- 75.0 40-42
3.5 Seismic Properties of the Ground

Compared to other parts of the Balkan Peninsula, the subject location lies in the area of relatively low
seismic activity. However, despite this fact, the planned structures should be designed as earthquake-
resistant by applying adequate methodology.
In line with the valid legislation – “Rulebook on Technical Norms for the Construction of High-Rise
Buildings in Seismic Areas” (Official Gazette of SFR Yugoslavia No. 31/81 with amendments in Official
Gazettes of SFR Yugoslavia No. 49/82, 29/83, 21/88 and 52/90), Seismological Map from 1987 and
Seismic Hazard Map of the Republic of Serbia from 1998 are referent for assessment of ground
seismicity.
On the tracing paper maps of macro-seismic intensity of earthquakes, the subject location lies in the
zone of 6.5-7.0° MSK-64 (Medvedev-Sponheuer-Karnik) scale, Figure 10. The value of horizontal
ground acceleration in rock is Acc=0.06 – 0.008g, Figure 11. All values refer to the referent period of
200 - 500 years.
The above intensity degree is the basic degree of seismic intensity related to the mean ground
conditions. Relative correction of the basic degree can be made based on engineering-geological,
hydrogeological, geological-tectonic and geomorphological properties of the ground. Thus:
o In the ground predominantly composed of silty-clayey-sandy sediments, the basic seismicity
degree could be increased up to 1º MSK;
o If groundwater level is directly below the foundations in sandy clay, clayey sand, clayey sand and
gravel, the basic seismicity degree is increased by 1º MSK.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 20

Figure 10: Seismic Hazard Map of the Republic of Serbia
Figure 11: Map of Effective Peak Values of Horizontal Acceleration

The report on completed geophysical investigations, which included definition of design seismicity
parameters for the bridge over the Sava River on Kuzmin-Sremska Rača road route, contains design
seismicity parameters for the construction of the future structure. The full report is given in Annex No.
1.8 to this study and design parameters are presented below in this chapter.
DESIGN SEISMICITY PARAMETERS BASED ON COMPLETED GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS
In line with Serbian Rulebook, selection of the seismological tracing paper map that is relevant for
assessment of seismicity of the subject bridge location depends on the structure category. In line with
the Serbian Rulebook and in accordance with the structure category, the seismologist is obliged to
select the tracing paper map that should be the starting point for assessment of the bridge location
seismicity.
The subject bridge is an integral part of the road with the elements of international traffic and it is one
of the key structures that enable this function. This fact makes it a Category 1 structure according to
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 21

the Serbian Rulebook and “greater than average” category in accordance with the Eurocode EC8.
The decision is within the Designer’s competence.
Eurocode EC8 points to the need to determine the maximum amplitude of referent acceleration in “A”
type geological medium. In this analysis, a conversion was made from the Serbian Seismological Map
to the one required by Eurocde EC8. This conversion involved reduction of seismic degree specified
for the subject location on the official seismological map so that it corresponds to “A” type of the ground
then the seismic degree at the subject location determined in that way was given as referent maximum
acceleration аgr.
The analysis showed that seismo-tectonic conditions (proximity of seismogenic faults) at the subject
location are not a restriction for construction of a bridge at the subject locations. The general
engineering parameters of impacts of earthquakes with the return periods of 100 and 500 years are
given below.
Engineering characteristic of impacts of earthquakes with the return period of 100 years are as follow:
Characteristic of seismic energy source

- Earthquake magnitude 6.0;
- Faulting manner during earthquake generation - normal fault;
- Focal depth 10 km
Engineering parameters of site response:
- Epicentral distance of the site from the focus 45 km;

- Peak acceleration amplitude =80 sm/s2;
- Period interval that peak acceleration amplitude could belong to with the probability of 67% is 0.16
sec. < 0.26 sec. < 0.41 sec.;
- The assessed value of the width of impulse duration in which amplitudes exceed 40 sm/s2 is
d = 5.3 s;
- The assessed duration of oscillation (record) is around 26 s.
Engineering characteristic of impacts of earthquakes with the return period of 500 years are as follow:
Characteristic of seismic energy source

- Faulting manner during earthquake generation - normal fault;
- Focal depth 15 km
Engineering parameters of site response:
- Epicentral distance of the site from the focus 45 km;

- Peak acceleration amplitude =100 sm/s2;
- Period interval that peak acceleration amplitude could belong to with the probability of 67%
is 0.19 sec. < 0.30 sec. < 0.48 sec.
- The assessed value of the width of impulse duration in which amplitudes exceed 50 sm/s2 is
d = 6.1 s.
- The assessed duration of oscillation (record) is around 31 sec.
DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF EUROCODE ЕC8
It is proposed that the value of bridge importance factor according to Eurodoce should correspond to:
Greater than average (bridges of crucial importance for maintenance of communications, particularly
after storms – international communication). The final decision shall be reached by the Designer.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 22

According to Eurocode EC8, the design acceleration of “A” type ground аg is represented by the
product of the importance factor of the subject structure “g1” and referent peak ground acceleration
аgr for “A” type ground i.e. аg = g1аgr.
The conditions in the bridge area on the left and right riverbank are similar and according to EC8
categorisation, the ground belongs to Category “C”. For that reason, it can be adopted that there is no
spatial variation of the ground along the bridge.
For the Damage Limitation Requirement according to EC8, Part 2 – limited damage (Serviceability
Limit State)
- “A” type of the ground, peak ground acceleration аgr = 80 cm/s2 = 0.08 g
- Value of referent peak ground acceleration аgr for “A” type ground аgr = 80 cm/s2 should be multiplied
by the importance factor of the subject structure “g1”, which gives the value of design acceleration
аg = g1аgr
- Ground category is of “C” type
- For earthquake calculations, the spectrum of response 1 should be used
For the No-Collapse Requirement according to EC8, Part 2 – requirement of failure prevention
(Ultimate Limit State)
- “A” type of the ground, peak ground acceleration аgr = 100 cm/s2 = 0.10 g
- “A” type of the ground, peak ground acceleration аgr= 100cm/s2 should be multiplied by the
importance factor of the subject structure “g1”, which gives the value of design acceleration
аg = g1аgr
- Ground category is of “C” type
- For earthquake calculations, the spectrum of response 1 should be used
From the aspect of earthquake conditions, it is recommended to apply deep foundations of bridge
supports, by using piles with the dominant load-bearing capacity in the base.
DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF SERBIAN RULEBOOK (Equivalent static load

method)
In line with the rulebook (Official Gazette of SFR Yugoslavia 31/81), seismic forces are calculated by
applying the method of equivalent static load and dynamic analysis method is also used for out-of-
category structures.
The equivalent static load method involves calculation of total horizontal seismic force by applying the
following formula:
S=KG
Where: K – total seismic coefficient, G total weight of the structure.
Total coefficient K is calculated by applying he following relation:
K=K0KsKdKp
Where: K0 – coefficient of structure category; Ks – coefficient of seismic intensity;
Kd dynamic coefficient; Kp – ductility and attenuation coefficient.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 23

Seismicity coefficient is calculated by applying the following formula:

𝒂
𝑲𝒔 = × 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓
𝒈
Where: а – design acceleration; g- gravity acceleration.
In determining the design seismicity parameters for the calculations by applying this methodology,
increased risk was valorised based on the parameter of design earthquake return.
It is proposed to adopt Category 1 for the bridge on the Sava River in accordance with the Serbian
Rulebook. Final decision shall be reached by the Designer.
- Seismic intensity coefficient Ks =0.028;

- Ordinate of dynamic coefficient Kd shall be selected for the second ground category.
4 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF STRUCTURE FOUNDATION
A bridge with the main structure length of around 330.0 m and width of around 31.0 m, and with four
travel lanes and two emergency lanes, i.e. three lanes in each direction, shall be constructed at the
subject location. According to the bridge structure design, the main bridge structure shall rest on four
piers, which shall transfer structure load to the ground. Out of the four designed piers, two shall be
located on the Sava riverbanks and two in the riverbed. The spacing between the piers of the main
bridge structure shall be 90 m i.e. 150 m in the riverbed. The bridge approach structures shall rest on
the total of 21 piers with the spacing of 41-67.5 m.
The ground in the zone of the future structures is composed of alluvial flood-facies sediments,
comprising the following lithological members: silty-sandy clays (apg,pr), sandy-muddy silts (appr,p,m)
and silty sand (app,pr) to the depth of 5.0-12.0 m from the ground surface. These sediments lie over
riverbed sediments consisting of sands and silty-sandy gravel (akp and akš,p) to the maximum
investigation depth of 40.0 m. Groundwater level during the investigations ranged from 3.0 to 5.0 m
from the ground surface, at the absolute elevations of around 75.0 -76.0 masl.
The determined geotechnical ground model leads to the following conclusions:
Unfavourable media for structure foundations – alluvial sediments of flood facies: silty-sandy clays
(apg,pr), sandy-muddy silts (appr,p,m) and silty sand (app,pr) to the depth of 5.0-12.0 m.
Favourable medium for foundation of structures with large specific loads – alluvial sediments of
riverbed facies: silty-sandy gravel (akš,p).
Based on completed geotechnical investigations and tests, it is recommended to use deep
foundation of all structures at this location.
For the determined geotechnical ground model and relatively large expected loads of the structure
that will be transferred through piles to the ground, it can be concluded that silty-sandy gravel (aкš,p)
is the most favourable medium for pile support.
It is recommended to have the bases of future piles supported in deeper parts of these sediments, at
the depth of around 20-25 m from the ground elevation due to presence of inerbeds and lenses with
lower load-bearing capacity to the depth of around 20.0 m. In designing the piles, it is recommended
to restrain the piles in the load-bearing layer by at least three pile diameters. Due to the presence of
inerbeds and lenses with lower load-bearing capacity, each pile location has to be analysed separately
and required pile depths need to be determined depending on the load and ground model.
Having in mind that data about foundations and loads (depths – elevations of head beam – foundation
slab, pile lengths and diameters, number and spatial distribution of piles in the battery and designed
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 24

loads per pile) had not been defined accurately during preparation of these documents, only allowable
loads for individual piles were calculated.
For the main bridge structure, the allowable load-bearing capacity of piles below piers S-13, S-14 and
S-16 was analysed for the piles with the diameter of Ø 1500 mm and lengths of 18-22 m.
For the bridge approach structures, the allowable load-bearing capacity of piles below piers S-7 and
S-18 was analysed for the piles with the diameter of Ø 1200 mm and lengths of 15 m.
The purpose of these calculations was to enable the designer to select the foundation type and depth.
The final manner and conditions of structure foundation, dimensioning of piles and detailed analysis
of load-bearing capacity and settlements of a pile grope shall be performed at the civil design level,
when all necessary input parameters become available.
4.1 Applied Methods of Geostatic Calculations
Calculations of Allowable Load-Bearing Capacity of Individual Piles

The allowable load-bearing capacity of individual piles was calculated by applying the methods in
accordance with the Rulebook on Technical Conditions for Foundation of Civil Structures (Official
Gazette No. 15/90) and LCPC methods (Bustamante&Gianeselli, 1982), based on CPT results.
The allowable load-bearing capacity of a pile (Nd), in accordance with the Rulebook on
Technical Conditions for Foundation of Civil Structures, was calculated by applying the following
formula:
Nd= q·Aq+p·Ap
Where:
q·Aq - load-bearing capacity of pile base;
p·Ap - load-bearing capacity of pile casing;
Nd - allowable pile load;
q - allowable specific ground load at the pile top level;
Aq - pile section area at the pile top level (Aq = r2·p);
p - allowable specific load for friction of load-bearing layers by the casing;
Ap - casing area along these layers (Ap = 2·r·p·L).
The allowable specific load q was calculated by applying the following formula:
q = ·r·Nr + d·Ks·Nqr+ cmNcr
Where:
 - unit weight of the ground at the pile top level;

d - vertical pressure of ground dead load at the pile top level (d = ·D);
Ks - coefficient of ground pressure at standstill at the pile top level (Ks= 1 - sin(f'));
c'm - mobilised ground cohesion at the pile top level (c'm= c'/Fc);
f'm - mobilised shearing strength angle (tan(f'm)= tan(f')/Ff')
Ncr Nr, Nqr – factors of load-bearing capacity dependant on the value of the allowable mobilised
shearing strength angle f'm;
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 25

r - pile base radius.

The llowable specific load p was calculated by applying the following formula:
p = am + oKs tgm
Where:
am - mobilised adhesion between pile and surrounding ground (Am= ∑((c/Fc)·h)/L), i.e. mobilised
cohesion of the surrounding ground if cohesion is lower than adhesion;
o - vertical pressure of ground dead load at the middle level of the load-bearing layer x that
transfers load by friction (o = z·g);
m - mobilised friction angle between the pile and ground (tan('m)= ∑(tan(')/F')*h)/L), i.e.
m = f'm if f' is lower than '
Adopted safety factors:

Ff'= 1.50
Fc= 2.50
Calculations of Allowable Pile Load-Bearing Capacity by Applying LCPC Method (Bustamante)

This method is also known as French LCPC method (Laboratoиre Central des Ponts et Chausees),
and the allowable load-bearing capacity is calculated based on static penetration data, by applying
the following relation:
Where:
Qp - limit load-bearing capacity of pile base
Qs - limit load-bearing capacity of pile casing
Ap - pile base area
As - pile casing area
kc, α - coefficient dependant on ground type
qc - average resistance to cone penetration at the depth of (3-4)D above and 1D below the cone
base, where D is the pile base diameter.
Adopted safety factors:
Fsp= 2.5 - 3.0 – safety factor for pile base
Fss= 2.5 – safety factor for pile casing
4.2 Results of Geostatic Calculations
Main Bridge Structure – Pier S-13
The geotechnical ground model for the zone of the planned pier was developed based on exploratory
borehole S-19 and CPT-S 19. Five SPTs were performed in this exploratory borehole. The
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 26

geotechnical ground model is presented in Figure No. 12 and the adopted parameters of physical-
mechanical properties of identified geotechnical media and their depths are given in Table No. 16
below.
Table 16: Adopted Physical-Mechanical Parameters of Geotechnical Media and Thicknesses of

Identified Geotechnical Media
Layer qc
Medium γ c'
Thickness GWL φ' (°) Mv (kN/m2)
Designation (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
(m)
apg,pr 1 7.4 19.5/10 20 15 5000 3500-6000
app,pr 2 6.0 18.5/10 30 2 9000 4500
akš,p 3 7.2 4.2 19.5/10 40 0 45000 30000
akp 4 1.4 19.5/10 34 0 20000 10000
akš,p 5 18.0 19.5/10 40 0 70000 45000
Results of geostatic calculations are given in Table No. 17 below.

Table 17: Results of Geotechnical Calculations
Allowable Pile Load-Bearing Capacity Allowable
Pier Pile Pile Head Beam
Qa (kN) Load of
Designati Diameter Length Depth
According to LCPC Individual
on (m) (m) (m)
Rulebook (Bustamante) Piles (kN)
S-13 1.5 18 4.67 11294 8589 9950
Figure 12: Geotechnical Section of the Ground in the Zone of Pier S-13
borehole S-20. Five SPTs were performed in this exploratory borehole. The geotechnical ground
model is presented in Figure No. 13 and the adopted parameters of physical-mechanical properties
of identified geotechnical media and their depths are given in Table No. 18 below.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 27


Identified Geotechnical Media
Layer qc
Medium γ c' Mv
Thickness GWL φ' (°)
Designation (kN/m3) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
(m)
akš,p 1 19 19.5/10 38 0 45000 35000
-3.5
akš,p 2 11 20.0/10 40 2 70000 45000

Qa (kN) Load of
on (m) (m) (m)
S-14 1.5 22 5.33 14094 12599 12000
below.

Identifies Geotechnical Media
Layer qc
Medium γ c'
(m)
apg,pr 1 4.5 4.7 19.5/10 20 15 5000 2000
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 28
appr,p,m 2 3.7 18.0/10 20 9 2800 950

akp 3 1.7 19.5/10 34 0 15000 7500
akš,p 4 20 19.5/10 40 0 60000 40000

Qa (kN) Load of
on (m) (m) (m)
S-16 1.5 18 4.52 11183 10529 10800
Bridge Approach Structure – Pier S-7
below.

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 29

Layer qc
Medium γ c'
(m)
apg,pr 1 5.0 19.5/10 20 15 5000 2000
appr,p,m 2 4.4 18.0/10 20 9 2800 1200
ap p,pr 3 1.6 19.5/10 30 0 5000 2500
3.5
akš,p 4 4.3 19.5/10 40 0 40000 25000
akp 5 2.7 19.5/10 34 0 22500 15000
akš,p 6 7.0 19.5/10 40 0 60000 40000

Qa (kN) Load of
on (m) (m) (m)
S-7 1.2 15 3.3 5718 5082 5400
Bridge Approach Structure – Pier S-18
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 30

below.

Layer qc
Medium γ c'
(m)
apg,pr 1 4.2 19.5/10 20 15 5000 1500
pr,p,m
ap 2 1.2 18.0/10 20 9 2800 1200
4.9
p
ak 3 3.3 19.5/10 30 0 15000 7500
š,p
ak 4 16.3 19.5/10 40 0 60000 40000

Qa (kN) Load of
on (m) (m) (m)
S-18 1.2 15 3.38 5886 6423 6100
Records of calculations of load-bearing capacity of individual piles are given in Numerical Documents,
Annex No. 1.7.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 31

5 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF FILL CONSTRUCTION
In the subject section of the future highway, approaches to transitional bridge structures shall involve
fills with the heights ranging from 4.0 to 7.3 m. The highest fill heights are expected at the transitions
between bridge approach structures and fills and they shall amount to 7.0 m on Sremska Rača side
and 7.3 m on the side of the Republic of Srpska.
The ground in the zone of the future fills is composed of alluvial flood-facies sediments, comprising
the following lithological members: silty-sandy clays (apg,pr), sandy-muddy silts (appr,p,m) and silty sand
(app,pr) to the depth of 5.0-12.0 m from the ground surface. These sediments lie over riverbed
sediments consisting of sands and sandy gravel (akp and akš,p) to the maximum investigation depth of
40.0 m. Groundwater level during the investigations ranged from 3.0 to 5.0 m from the ground surface,
at the absolute elevations of around 75.0 -76.0 masl.
During preparation of this report, the material to be used for construction of future fills was not known
and therefore geotechnical calculations of fill slope stability were not made. Based on information
about materials from local borrow areas that could be used for construction of the fills, it is
recommended to design the fill slopes with the inclination of 1:2 for fills up to 4 m high and with double
inclination, being 1:2 and 1:3, for higher fills. The exact fill slope inclination shall be defined in the next
phase of designing, after selection of material for fill construction.
5.1 Methods Applied to Geostatic Calculations

Calculations of Ground Settlements below Fills in Time
Settlements were calculated by using Osterberg nomogram for determination of vertical stresses
caused by trapeze fill load. The time of axial ground consolidation (time flow of settlements) below the
fills was determined by using Barron diagrams for the case of two-way infiltration, because as a rule,
incoherent sands and gravely-sandy sediments are present below unconsolidated sediments in the
surface zone of the ground.
The prognosis ground settlements under fill load and consolidation time were calculated for 1
characteristic cross section of the ground in the zone of the highest fill.
The calculations were made for characteristic points under the fill, as presented in Figure 17 and in
the table below for the case of fill construction to the height that corresponds to operation conditions.
Figure 17: Schematic Presentation of Characteristic Points Below the Fill for Calculation of
Prognosis Settlements
5.2 Results of Geostatic Calculations

For the purpose of these calculations, a geotechnical ground model in the fill zone, at the chainage of
km 16+580 was adopted, which was developed based in exploratory borehole S-9 and cone
penetration test CPT – S 8. Three SPTs were performed in this exploratory borehole. The adopted
parameters of physical-mechanical properties of identified geotechnical media and their depths are
presented in Table No. 24 below. The fill height of 7.0m was adopted for this analysis. Fill settlement
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 32

time on the side of the Republic of Srpska was not analysed because of impossibility to carry out field
works and consequently lack of data necessary for such an analysis.
Table 24: Adopted Physical-Mechanical Parameters of Geotechnical Media and Their Thicknesses
Layer Kf
Medium γ
Thickness GWL Mv (kN/m2)
Designation (kN/m3) (cm/s)
(m)
apg,pr 1 5.0 19.5/10 5000 1.0X10-7
appr,p,m 2 3.0 18.0/10 2800 2.8X10-7
0
ap p,pr 3 3.0 19.5/10 10000 1.0X10-5
akš,p 4 14 19.5/10 50000 1X10-2
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 33

Based on the results of calculations of ground settlement underneath the fill, it can be concluded that
the prognosis design ground settlement underneath the fill at characteristic point C is 35.4 cm and
that the expected time period in which 90% of consolidation will occur is 9.4 months.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 34

6 General Geotechnical Recommendations
6.1 General Geotechnical Recommendations for Subsoil Treatment

In the route parts where it runs on a fill or directly on the ground surface, first the topsoil shall be
stripped with the average thickness of 50-70cm.
Excavated topsoil shall be deposited in the vicinity in order to be used later for final topsoiling of fill
slopes.
Topsoil shall be deposited only on the levelled parts of the ground, where additional load cannot cause
sliding. Topsoil shall not be deposited in the close zone above the “head” of cut-and-fill slopes.
After topsoil stripping, the Contractor shall ensure ground moisture that enables passage of
construction machinery and vehicles, as well as optimum compaction conditions. Ground compaction
shall follow previous levelling of the ground surface. Adequate drainage shall be provided for the
compacted surfaces and subsoil treatment.
In addition to compaction, works on subsoil treatment shall include potential spreading for the purpose
of soil drying or moistening in order to ensure that its water content is close to the optimum value
(Wopt), as well as improvement of the ground with insufficient load-bearing capacity by using
geocomposite or replacing the soil with granulated incoherent material (crushed stone or gravel) or
other rehabilitation measures. Incorporation of such material has double purpose, it shall serve as
hydro-barrier, i.e. it shall prevent capillary rise of water into the fill body and at the same time improve
the subsoil.
Subsoil material compaction shall be controlled in line with the valid standards and criteria prescribed
in the General Technical Specifications.
The criteria for the evaluation of subsoil treatment quality i.e. soil material compaction are as follows:
Table No. 25: Required Values of Natural Ground Density

Required Standard
Type of Natural Ground and Fill Height Proctor Compaction
(SRPS U.B1.038)
- Natural ground composed of fine-grained (coherent) soil and designed fill 97%
height up to 2 m
- Natural ground composed of fine-grained (coherent) soil and designed fill
height over 2 m 95%
- Natural ground composed of loose coarse-grained or mixed soil and designed 100%
fill height up to 2 m
- Natural ground composed of loose coarse-grained or mixed soil and designed
fill height over 2 m 95%
All works and quality control shall be performed in accordance with the valid standards and technical
criteria prescribed in SRPS (U.E1.010 and U.Е8.010).
Subsoil Material Quality Control:
- SRPS U.B1.010 – sampling
- SRPS U.B1.012 – determination of soil moisture content
- SRPS U.B1.014 – determination of specific gravity of soil
- SRPS U.B1.016 – determination of unit weight of soil
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 35
- SRPS U.B1.018 – determination of grain-size distribution

- SRPS U.B1.020 – determination of Atterberg limits
- SRPS U.B1.024 – determination of the combustible and organic matter content of a soil
- SRPS U.B1.038 – determination of the relation moisture content - density of soil
-
Incorporation quality control:
- SRPS U.B1.010 - sampling
- SRPS U.B1.012 - determination of soil moisture content
- SRPS U.B1.046 – determination of compression modulus
6.2 General Geotechnical Recommendations for Fill Construction

Construction of fills involves filling, spreading, rough and fine levelling, moistening and compaction of
fill material in accordance with the dimensions specified in the design and if required, stabilisation of
filling material with lime or cement.
All works shall be performed in accordance with the Design and Technical Specifications, as well as with
valid SRPS standard (U.E1.010).
Available local materials may be used for construction of fills. All materials have to fulfil requirements
stipulated in the standard in terms of their usability for fill construction.
The criteria for evaluation of the quality of coherent materials before their incorporation are given in
Table 26. Criteria given in Table 27 below shall apply to incoherent materials that are to be
incorporated in fills.
Table No. 26
Soil Properties Required Values
Water content of material shall be close to the optimum value  2%
Liquid limit wl  65%

Plasticity index Ip  30%
Maximum dry unit weight - dmax (Е=600 и 2750kNm/m3 ) for up to 3 m high  15.0 kN/m3
fills
Maximum dry unit weight - d max (Е=600 и 2750kNm/m3) for fills with the height  15.5 kN/m3
over 3 m
Optimum water content wopt  25%
(Е=600 kNm/m3)
Degree of non-uniformity Cu= d60 / d10  9%
Content of organic matters  6%
Table No. 27
Grain size must not exceed 40 cm, except in the final fill layer where the largest grain must not be
larger than 10 cm.
Degree of non-uniformity Cu=d60/d10 not smaller than 9.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 36

Material quality control:
- SRPS U.B1.010 – sampling

- SRPS U.B1.012 – determination of soil moisture content
- SRPS U.B1.014 – determination of unit weight of solid particles
- SRPS U.B1.013 – determination of density of soil in place by the drive-cylinder method
- SRPS U.B1.018 – determination of grain-size distribution
- SRPS U.B1.020 – determination of Atterberg limits
- SRPS U.B1.024 – determination of the combustible and organic matter content of a soil
- SRPS U.B1.038 – determination of the relation moisture content - density of soil
- SRPS U.B1.042 - determination of the California bearing ratio in laboratory.
If the fill is constructed by using incoherent material, the grain size must not be larger than 2/3 of the
layer thickness i.e. larger than 40 cm, except in the final fill layer where the largest grain must not be
larger than 10 cm.
Each emplaced layer shall be compacted until adequate density is achieved, which depends on the
layer position in the fill and type of material. Compaction is defined either by the requested percentage
of the maximum dry unit weight (dmax) determined by standard Proctor test, constrained modulus Ms
determined by test plate or deformation modulus Еv2.
Determination of deformation modulus Еv2 by circular plate load is defined in SRPS U.B1.047. Table
28 below shows the requested compaction values in accordance with the valid SRPS standards.
Table No. 28: Requested Compaction Values in Accordance with Valid SRPS Standard
Requested Minimum Modulus Requested Minimum
Compressibility Deformation Proctor Compaction
Layer Position in Fill and Material Type
(SRPS U.B1.046) Ev2 (MPa) E = 600 kN/m3
Ms (МPa) (SRPS U.B1.038)
а) For fills with the height over 2.0 m

For layers below the road bed formation
- For fine-grained (coherent) soils - 20 95%
- For loose (coarse-grained) and mixed soils with up to 95%
20% of stone material
35
b) For fills with the height up to 2.0m, for all layers

except road bed formation
- For fine-grained (coherent) soils
- 100%
- For loose (coarse-grained) and mixed soils with up to
20% of stone material
40 100%
The criteria for control of quality of incorporation of loose coarse-grained and mixed soils with more
than 20% of stone material given through the constrained modulus МS, which was determined by static
circular plate test 30 cm, are presented in Table 29 below.
Table No. 29
Requested Minimum
Loose (coarse-grained) and mixed soils with more than 20% of stone material Constrained Modulus МS
(МN/m2)
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 37

For mixed materials with 20-30% of stone material 25 - 30
For mixed materials with 30-50% of stone material 30 - 35
For mixed materials with more than 50% of stone material with the optimum or
40
close water content
Control shall be performed by applying the following standards:

- SRPS U.B1.010 - sampling
- SRPS U.B1.012 - determination of soil moisture content
- SRPS U.B1.016 - determination of unit weight of soil
- SRPS U.B1.013 - determination of density of soil in place by the drive-cylinder method
- SRPS U.B1.046 - determination of compression modulus by circular slab method
Transport and filling of material on already prepared subsoil or emplaced fill layer may be commenced
with only after the Engineer has approved the lower layers. Each individual layer has to be spread
horizontally in longitudinal direction or with the maximum inclination that equals the designed
longitudinal inclination. Transversally, each individual layer shall have a crossfall or superelevation of
4%. Fine-grained (coherent) materials have to be spread and compacted immediately after transport
to the site. Each individual layer shall be filled in accordance with the designed cross section.
Passages of transport vehicles have to be distributed as evenly as possible on the entire width of the
formation.
The thickness of individual spread layers has to correspond to the compaction depth effect of the used
compaction device, type of filled material and segregation phenomena. Each fill layer has to be
compacted in its full width by using adequate machine and in general from the periphery to the centre.
All places inaccessible to machinery or places where use of heavy compaction machinery would be
inappropriate for other reason (filling behind structures, retaining walls, etc.) shall be compacted by
using other convenient devices of methods.
Before compaction, each fill layer has to be in the condition close to the optimum water content ( 2%).
Compaction of each layer shall checked. If filling or compaction are interrupted or if weather conditions
worsen (rain, etc.), compaction of the last layer shall be checked before commencement of new filling
and compaction. Construction of fill may begin after compaction criteria have been fulfilled.
Filling shall be carried out in such a way to ensure, if possible, that the layers are horizontal in
longitudinal direction, avoiding abrupt level differences between layers of various heights and with the
inclination that still allows proper compaction.
Filling shall not be performed during frost or on surfaces covered by snow or ice.
In the terrain with the inclination steeper than 20º, fills shall be constructed on around 2 m wide steps,
cut in the ground where the fill is constructed. Lateral surfaces of the steps shall have the inclination
of 2:1 and downhill slope inclination of the steps shall be 4%.
If the ground inclination is steeper than 30º, steps shall be made without interspace and when the
inclination is 20º to 30º, 1 m wide interspace is envisaged. The transversal inclination of steps in
coherent materials shall be 4% looking from the lateral side.
Fill drainage shall involve construction of ditches, gutters and canals along the fill base. Culverts in fill
base shall be envisaged for high fills.
Immediately after formation of slopes, they shall be topsoiled which shall be followed by grass sowing
in order to prevent erosion of earth and loose sand material during heavy precipitation and its
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 38
dispersing by strong wind. The thickness of the topsoil layer shall be around 20 cm. Local material
removed below the fill base or from the ground surface during formation of cuts shall be used for
topsoiling.
Wedges by the structures (bridges) shall be formed for the purpose of eliminating roadway strains at
transitions from the fill to the structure. The material used for formation of wedges shall correspond to
material quality prescribed for the lower load-bearing base of the pavement structure. The wedges
shall be formed in layers with the respective maximum thickness of 50 cm.
Material shall be compacted in layers by the structures in the same manner as prescribed for
compaction of pavement structure courses. The minimum compaction of the finishing layer shall be
70 MPa and the value decrease by 10 МPа can be tolerated for each 0.5 m of depth.
Wedges can be formed in the following manners:
- If the structure has been completed before construction of the fill, wedge shall be formed in
parallel with the fill construction;
- If the structure has not been completed and construction of fill is in progress, the fill shall be
constructed as close to the structure as possible.
Wedge dimensions shall depend on the structure height and length of transitional slab.
The slope round heads of fills at transitions to the structures shall be lined with masonry stone or
concrete slabs.
7 GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on all completed engineering-geological and geotechnical investigations and tests of the
ground at the location of the future structure, the following conclusions were reached:
 Results of investigations and tests show that the entire investigation area is lithologically
characterised by a relatively uniform ground model, composed of silty-sandy clay (apg,pr)
stretching to the depth of 4-7 m. It lies over sandy-muddy silt (appr,p,m), which stretches to the
depth of 7.8-9.8 m and lies over alluvial silty sands (app,pr) stretching to the depth of 10.3-11.8
m. The alluvial sediments of flood facies lie over alluvial riverbed-facies sediments, which
consist of medium-grained sand and sility-sandy gravel (akp and аkš,p) and which were
registered to the maximum investigation depth of 40.0 m. Groundwater level ranged from 3.0
- 4.9 m from the ground surface during the investigations.
 It is recommended to apply deep foundation of the structure, on reinforced concrete piles,

which refers both to the main bridge structure and approach structures. For the determined
geotechnical ground model and relatively high expected structure loads, which shall be
transferred through piles to the ground, it can be concluded that alluvial silty-sandy gravel
(аkš,p), which was registered at the depth of around 10.3-11.8 m from the present ground
surface, is the most favourable medium for pile support. It is also recommended to place the
bases of the future piles at the elevation of 60.0 masl or deeper, where the silty-sandy gravel
is more compact and presence of inerbeds and lenses of silt and silty sand with poorer
deformability properties is less possible.
 Based on the results of geostatic calculations made for drilled piles Ø1200 mm and Ø1500
mm, with the effective lengths of L=15, L=18 and L=22, it can be concluded that the calculated
allowable loads of individual piles are in the intervals presented in Table No. 26 below,
depending on the local geological alterations and spatial position of the pier and the terrain.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 39


Allowable Load-Bearing Capacity of Allowable
Piles Qa (kN) Load-Bearing
Capacity of
on (m) (m) (m) Piles
Rulebook (Bustamante)
(kN)
S-7 1.2 15 3.3 5718 5082 5400
S-18 1.2 15 3.38 5886 6423 6100
S-13 1.5 18 4.67 11294 8589 9950
S-16 1.5 18 4.52 11183 10529 10800
S-14 1.5 22 5.33 14094 12599 12000
 It is recommended to perform a trial loading of piles. The number and position of test piles
shall be selected in accordance with the given geotechnical ground models, static loads of the
structure and the total number of piles that shall be driven. In that way, the limit and allowable
load-bearing capacity of individual piles shall be verified at the site, as well as pile settlements
under operating, allowable and limit loads. Based on the obtained results, the values shall be
checked and the allowable load-bearing capacity and settlements of piles shall be
recalculated.
 In excavating foundation pits, special measures of excavation support shall be undertaken as
prescribed in the “Rulebook on Technical Norms for Foundation of Civil Structures”.
Foundation pits and cofferdams can be supported by using Larssen sheet piles or some other
temporary retaining structure. Apart from that, groundwater level shall be lowered during
construction of bridge foundation by using water pumps or some other drainage system, such
as needle filers or wells.
 During pile driving, it is recommended to perform control standard penetration tests (SPT) at
pile bases for the purpose of checking density of the ground where the pile shall rest. It is
proposed to perform SPTs in at least two piles in the group: the first test 1.5 m above the base
and the second test at the designed elevation of the pile base. The tests shall be performed
by using a standard penetrometer with penetration tube or cone depending on the ground type.
In order to verify the calculated load-bearing capacity of piles, the minimum number of blows
per test shall be N=35.
 It is recommended to develop and line riverbanks in the zone of the future bridge in order to
prevent negative effects of river erosion on the bank piers of the bridge.
 During construction of fills, slope round heads and wedges of the bridge, all works and control
of incorporated material quality shall be performed in accordance with the valid standards and
technical criteria prescribed in SRPS (U.Е1.010 and U.Е8.010). Due to low load-bearing
capacity of the ground and relatively high groundwater level, it is recommended to emplace
geocomposite and a fill layer made of incoherent material (crushed stone or gravel) with the
thickness of 0.5-1.0 m after topsoil stripping and treatment of subsoil. This fill layer will serve
as a hydro-barrier i.e. it will prevent capillary rising of water in the fill body and at the same
time it would improve the subsoil.
 Based on the results of calculations of ground settlements under the fill with the height of
H=7.0 m, it can be concluded that the prognosis design ground settlement under the fill is 35.4
cm for the characteristic point S and that the expected time period in which 90% of
consolidation will occur is 9.4 months.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 40
 During preparation of this report, the material that would be used for construction of the future
fills had not been defined and therefore geotechnical calculations of fill slope stability were not
made. Based on information about material from local borrow areas that could be used for
construction of fills, it is recommended to design fill slopes with the inclination of 1:2 for up to
4 m high fills and to design the highest fills with double slope inclination, being 1:2 and 1:3.
The exact fill slope inclination shall be defined in the next designing phase, after selection of
material that will be used for fill construction.
 According to GN-200 classification, the alluvial sediments belong to Category II-III of soil in
which excavations shall be made.
 Analysed groundwater samples are in accordance with the standards given in the Rulebook
on Technical Norms for Concrete and Reinforced Concrete in Structures Exposed to
Aggressive Action of Environment and they belong to Class A1, which is characterised as
nonaggressive.
 During execution of investigation works, exploratory boreholes could not be drilled on the right
Sava riverbank, in the Republic of Srpska. The terrain in the zone of the access road from the
existing international road to the end of the route is overgrown with thick forest, which
prevented access of drilling rigs and equipment. In the next phase of designing, unhindered
access of equipment shall be provided in order to perform the required investigations and tests.
At least one investigation work (exploratory borehole or CPT) has to be performed at each
envisaged pier location.
 Pile driving, excavation of foundations and filling of approach ramps require constant
geotechnical monitoring.
Prepared by:
Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng.
2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 41

1.6 GRAPHIC DOCUMENTS
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX NO. NAME

1. Engineering-Geological Map Showing Locations of Investigation Works
2. Geotechnical Sections of the Ground
3. Exploratory Borehole Sections
4. Diagrams and Results of CPT and CPTU
5. Overview of Results of Laboratory Tests of Soil
6. Chemical Analysis of Water and Assessed Aggressiveness to Concrete
Annex 1
Engineering-Geological Map Showing
Locations of Investigation Works
LEGEND
1 GEOTEHICAL ENVIRONMENT
16+5 ИЈЕ
5
PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
8 7 .9
GENETIC GRAPHIC ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ' c' Mv
Ц
Cu
CLASSIFICATION VIEW
АКА НСТРУК
(kN/m3) (kN/m3) (°) (kN/m2) (MN/m2) (kN/m2)
Man-made ground - road and the Sava flood control embankment, of heterogeneous composition, the road fill consists of clayey silt
Anthropogenic
and dredged sand and the finishing layers consist of gravel. The road fill has been technical developed and consolidated.
RECENT
- КМ
n
The Sava River flood control embankment consists of clayey silt, it has been technically developed and it is a bank protection of the 18 10 20-28 0-10 - -
О
(80.11)
НЕ К
Sava River. According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations.
C-3
ПРИЛАЗНЕ К
КРАЈ ПРИЛАЗНЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ

ЛЕВА ТРАКА - КМ 17+910.37
ЛАЗ
А ТР
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow in colour, of medium to hard plastic consistency, medium to high plasticity and medium to low
ОНСТРУКЦИ compressibility. This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of secondary impurities, around 1-2 cm large sporadic CaCO3
ЈЕ НА ЛЕВОЈ
ПРИ
ЛЕВ
apg,pr concretions were registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust. According to GN-200 classification, it
n ОБАЛИ g,pr g,pr

n
(80.19)
ap ap
19.5 10 20 15 3.0-6.0 35-65
belongs to Category II of excavations.
ТАК
g,pr ГЛАВНА ЧЕЛИЧНА КОНСТРУКЦИЈА
C-5
ap
Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This
Е
ПРИЛАЗНЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ НА ДЕСНОЈ ОБАЛ
(79.43)
(80.30)
medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. The medium is intensively
ПОЧ
C-11
И
pr,p,m
ap
apg,pr
moistened and water-saturated. 18.0 10 20 9 1.2-3.5 20-40
C-7
According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category I-II of excavations.
С1л ОСНОВА МОСТА
(84.69)
С2л Flood facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density. This medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular
БП-5
Р 1:2000
CPT-S 4
(80.48)
horizontal and vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt
(80.12)
С3л p,pr
Alluvium
ap 18.5 10 30 0-2 5.0-17.5 -
which is present in the percentage of mush less than 10-20%.
C-9
(81.90)
С4л According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations.
БП-6
QUATERNARY
С5л
(85.59)
С6л С7л
(80.23)
CPT-S 6
С8л С9л С10л Riverbed facies - fine-grained sand with sporadic gravel grains, grey in colour, of medium density. The sand has uniform grain-size
БП-2
С11л
(80.29)
С12л
(80.23)
(80.35)
С13
C-19
С14
(80.80)
distribution, it is poorly graded, with granular porosity and water-saturated.
C-15
С15
C-22
С16
(47.72)
С17л
C-17
(80.10)
(80.78)
С18л С19л aкp According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations. 19 10 34 0 14.0-22.5 -
(47.80)
С20л С21л
C-20
БП-1
С22л С23л
C-24
С24л
C-21
С25л
CPT-S 8
Riverbed facies - silty-sandy gravel, grey in colour, fine to medium-grained, grain sizes 0.5-2 cm with sporadic larger grains. The
(80.33)
space between gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various petrological composition. This medium is of
CPT-S 10
aкš,p smaller density at the top, in the first 2 m, and of medium to high density at larger depths. It is of granular porosity and 19.5 10 38-40 0 40.0-75.0 -
(80.47)
water-saturated.
(81.16)
n
According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II-III of excavations.
(80.98)
C-12
CPT-S 18
CPT-S 16
БП-3
С1д
(80.82)
(80.32)
НЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ
С2д
CPT-S 22
CPT-S 24
2 STRUCTURAL MARKS
CPT-S 14
КРАЈ ГЛАВНЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ

С3д
ЈЕ
(80.21)
CPT-S 13
n
(80.11)
(80.15)
С4д
КЦИ
ON THE MAP ON THE SECTION
(79.95)
С5д BORDERS OF LITOGENETIC ENVIRONMENTS:
CPT-S 19
С6д С7д 03
С8д
М 16 ОНСТРУ
С9д С10д С11д С12д a. a.
(80.23)
n
a. Determined
02
.68
С17д С18д С19д b.
С20д С21д b.
КРАЈ ПРИЛАЗНЕ КОНСТРУКЦИЈЕ

b. Approximately located or assumed
+600
С22д С23д С24д С25д 01
g,pr
c.
РАК ЛАЗНЕ К
ap
c. Gradual transition
ДЕСНА ТРАКА - КМ 17+910.37

КМ 17+460.37
ПОЧЕТАК ГЛАВ
Number Date Description
КМ 17+130.37
Revision block:
А-К
ДЕС ТАК ПРИ
g,pr INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o.
n ap
река Сава
Nemanjina 6; 11000 Belgrade; Serbija
НА Т
Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
g,pr
Е
ap
E
ПОЧ
3 MARK OF EXECUTED INVESTIGATION WORKS

Organizational unit: Department for Geotechnical Engineering
SE
NE
ON THE MAP
N
Authorized person: Client:
S
a.
C-15 Investigation boreholes: No. License IKS: 391 M042 13
NW
SW TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET
(80.29) a. Map view Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol.
W
Associates:
Object:
Miloš Rankovic, msc.geol. Highway Kuzmin Sremska Rača border with the
a. CPT-S 10 Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava river
Static penetration test CPT:
(80.47) a. Map view
Part of the design:
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF THE BRIDGE
Internal control : CONSTRUCTION
1 1' Cross section Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol.
Цртеж: Scale:
Chief Designer: Engineering Geological Map
Dragoslav Dragićević, civ.eng. 1:2000
Head of the organizational unit: Design phase: Date: Drawing No.
Vladimir Filipović, msc.инж.geol. PD 05.2019. 1.
Annex 2
Geotechnical Sections of the Ground
LEGEND
1 GEOTEHICAL ENVIRONMENT
PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
km 17+129.37 km 17+220.37 km 17+370.37
Longitudinal section LEFT STRUCTURES km 17+461.37 km 17+512.37 km 17+569.87 km 17+637.37
GENETIC
CLASSIFICATION
GRAPHIC
VIEW
ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ' c' Mv Cu
С13 С14 С15 С16 km 17+694.87 (kN/m3) (kN/m3) (°) (kN/m2) (MN/m2) (kN/m2)
R 1:500 С17л С18л km 17+745.62 km 17+787.37
С19л km 17+828.37 km 17+869.37 Man-made ground - road and the Sava flood control embankment, of heterogeneous composition, the road fill consists of clayey silt
С20л С21л km 17+910.37
Anthropogenic
С22л
1'
С23л С24л n and dredged sand and the finishing layers consist of gravel. The road fill has been technical developed and consolidated.
main steel structure main steel structure С25л
RECENT
The Sava River flood control embankment consists of clayey silt, it has been technically developed and it is a bank protection of the 18 10 20-28 0-10 - -
REPUBLIKA SRPSKA Sava River. According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations.
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow in colour, of medium to hard plastic consistency, medium to high plasticity and medium to low
K.В.В. 81.77 C-22 C-24 compressibility. This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of secondary impurities, around 1-2 cm large sporadic CaCO3
(80.35)
CPT-S 22
(80.21) (80.01)
CPT-S 24
(80.11) n apg,pr concretions were registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust. According to GN-200 classification, it
19.5 10 20 15 3.0-6.0 35-65
(MPa) river Sava g,pr qc(MPa) g,pr qc(MPa) belongs to Category II of excavations.
ap gp,r C-20 C-21 ap ap gp,r ap N=11 ap gp,r ap gp,r
ap gp,r
ap gp,r
(74.80) 4.0 Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This
(74.72) pr,p,m 4.2 НПВ 4.9
ap p,m
r
? ?
1.27
pr,p,m
ap p
НПВ 4.7
N=5 ap p,m
r ap p 5.4 ? ?
p
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
? ap p,m
r ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
ap p,m
r ? ?
ap p,m
r ?
appr,p,m
medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. The medium is intensively
7.7 aкp
aк aк aкp ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? moistened and water-saturated. 18.0 10 20 9 1.2-3.5 20-40
ap p,r
aк 9.4 8.7
N=31
PILES Ø120cm
? ? ? ? ? ? aкp aкp According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category I-II of excavations.
N>50/12cm N=31 PILES Ø120cm PILES Ø120cm
? ?
PILES Ø120cm
? ? PILES Ø120cm ? PILES Ø120cm ?
PILES Ø120cm
PILES Ø150cm
? ? ?
PILES Ø120cm PILES Ø120cm
? ? ? ?
PILES Ø150cm (m)
(m) Flood facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density. This medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular
šp, aкšp, aкšp, aкšp, aкšp, aкšp,
Sava river
N=57 N=27
aк N=38 š,p N=42
app,pr
horizontal and vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt
Alluvium
18.5 10 30 0-2 5.0-17.5 -
š,p
N=54 ак N=54 which is present in the percentage of mush less than 10-20%.
š,p š,p ак According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations.
aкp ак ак
QUATERNARY
N=55
šp, N=52 Riverbed facies - fine-grained sand with sporadic gravel grains, grey in colour, of medium density. The sand has uniform grain-size
aк N=62 N=47
aк šp, aкšp, distribution, it is poorly graded, with granular porosity and water-saturated.
N=80 N=61 25.0 aкp According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II of excavations. 19 10 34 0 14.0-22.5 -
N=74
30.0 Riverbed facies - silty-sandy gravel, grey in colour, fine to medium-grained, grain sizes 0.5-2 cm with sporadic larger grains. The
N=87 N=79 space between gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various petrological composition. This medium is of
aкš,p smaller density at the top, in the first 2 m, and of medium to high density at larger depths. It is of granular porosity and 19.5 10 38-40 0 40.0-75.0 -
30.0 30.0 water-saturated.
According to GN-200 classification, it belongs to Category II-III of excavations.
2 STRUCTURAL MARKS
ON THE MAP ON THE SECTION
km 17+046.37 km 17+087.37 km 17+129.37 BORDERS OF LITOGENETIC ENVIRONMENTS:
km 16+921.87 km 16+962.87 km 17+004.62
km 16+839.20 km 16+880.07 С11л С12л С13 a. a. 03
km 16+721.44 km 16+788.94 С9л С10л a. Determined
km 16+587.95 km 16+630.01 km 16+671.07 С6л С7л С8л
С5л b.
1 С1л С2л С3л С4л
main steel structure
b.
c.
b. Approximately located or assumed
c. Gradual transition
02
01
SREMSKA RAČA
Number Date Description
C-5 C-7 C-9 CPT-S 10 C-12 C-15 C-17 C-19 Revision block:
C-3 CPT-S 4
CPT-S 6 CPT-S 8 (80.47) C-11 CPT-S 13 CPT-S 14
CPT-S 16
(80.80)
CPT-S 18
(80.82) CPT-S 19
3 MARK OF EXECUTED INVESTIGATION WORKS a. b. CPT-S 10
(80.12) (80.19) (80.23) (80.30) (80.33) (80.48) n (81.16) (80.15) (80.29)
(80.32)
(80.23) (80.23)
(80.47)
INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o.
(80.11) (79.95)
(79.43) 0.3 qc (MPa)
0.9 q c(MPa) 0.9
qc (MPa)
1.0
qc (MPa)
1.0 qc(MPa)
0.3 g,pr qc (MPa) qc(MPa) 0.5 qc(MPa)
gp,r g,pr
1.0 g,pr
qc(MPa)
gp,r
ON THE MAP ON THE SECTION CPT-S 10 Cone penetration tests (CPT):
gp,r g,pr
ap g,pr
g,pr g,pr g,pr
НПВ ap ap НПВ 3.8 g,pr НПВ 3.0 ap gp,r НПВ 3.5
ap gp,r ap НПВ 3.5 ap ap НПВ 4.2 ap ap a. C-15 b. (80.47) qc(MPa) a. Presentation on the map Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
ap НПВ ap НПВ ap 3.8 N= 16 ap 6.0 N=7 5.0 N=10 НПВ 4.2 Exploratory borehole:
4.2 4.3 5.4 5.1
N= 18
7.0 pr,p,m
N= 16
6.8 p,m
r
pr,p,m
ap p,pr
5.6
pr,p,m
5.7
ap p,m
r
pr,p,m
app,pr ap p,m
r
ap
pr,p,m N=3
ap p,m
r pr,p,m
ap
(80.29) C-15 a. Presentation on the map b. Presentation on ground section
pr,p,m 7.7 ap ap 7.8 app,pr
N=6
9.2
p,pr N=8 p,r
ap N= 12
pr,p,m
ap 9.8 ap p,r PILES Ø120cm ap
8.0
ap p,r PILES Ø120cm ap PILES Ø120cm ap p,r PILES Ø120cm p,pr PILES9.4
Ø120cm PILES Ø120cm p,r
PILESapØ120cm
p,pr 9.8 PILES Ø120cm PILES Ø120cm ap ap (80.29) b. Presentation on ground section
CPT-S 10 - penetration designation Organizational unit: Department for Geotechnical Engineering
10.9
p,pr 10.4 ap 10.3 N=19
ap N=10 ap N=14 PILES Ø120cm11.8 PILES Ø150cm
š,p
11.2 ap 11.8
N= 27
š,p PILES Ø120cm PILES Ø120cm š,p 11.4 š,p 11.0 10.9 0.5 (80.47)1) - absolute elevation of penetration Authorized person: Client:
ак ак
N= 33
ак aкšp, ак aкšp, š,p N=19
g,pr C - 15 - borehole designation
N=25
ак (m)
šp, 17.0 - test depth No. License IKS: 391 M042 13
ак
š,p N= 48
16.4
N= 64 (m)
ак
p
16.0 aкp p
16.0
N=32 p 15.3 17.0 aк ap НПВ 3.5 (80.29) - absolute borehole elevation Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol.
TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET
ap p
N=6
ак
p š,p šp, 17.0 š,p aк aк
(m)
pr,p,m N=13 5.0 - measured resistance to cone
N= 71
18.0
N= 32
(m) ак aк š,p
(m)
ак 18.0 18.0 aкp ap 19.0
N=41
pr,p,m N=3 5.20 - relative depth of lithological member
ак aкšp, š,p 20.0 aкp penetration q/c in MPa Associates:
Object:
ap
(m) N= 58 N=29
š,p
ак
N= 53
ак (m) š,p
ак
N=30
šp, š,p šp,
appr,g
- symbol of lithogenetic medium Miloš Rankovic, msc.geol.
22.0
24.0
(m)
aкšp, aк ак aк p,pr 9.4 25.00 - relative borehole depth
Highway Kuzmin Sremska Rača border with the
24.0 N=45 š,p
aкšp,
24.0 24.0 N=31
25.0
N=54
25.0 ак
(m)
ap N=10
- measured groundwater level with
(m) Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava river
26.0 N=73 š,p 11.0 ППВ-3.00
ак Nc= 5
- SPT location
with counted number of blows
10/M1-62
72.24 Borehole for existing documentation
Part of the design:
p 15.3 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF THE BRIDGE
N=6
aк Internal control : CONSTRUCTION
N=82
18.0 1 1' Geotechnical cross-section Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol.
Цртеж: Scale:
š,p N=30 Chief Designer: ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL
40.0
ак Dragoslav Dragićević, civ.eng. CROSS SECTION 1:500
N=54 Head of the organizational unit: Design phase: Date: Drawing No.
25.0 Vladimir Filipović, msc.инж.geol. PD 05.2019. 2.
Annex 3
Exploratory Borehole Sections
MARK C-3 coordinate X 6603022 CHAINAGE. ----- KM
SERIAL - coordinate Y 4975654 DRILLED BY SI. CIP. d.о.о.
DEPTH (m') 23.0 START DATE 21.03.2019 MAPPED BY Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. PHOTOS OF THE BOREHOLE CORE C-3
ELEVATION (mnm) 80.11 END DATE 21.03.2019 DREW BY Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol.
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
LITHOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION GWT
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
Topsoil - toposoiled clay with organic remains of plant roots
0.9 h
79.21 0.9
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow in colour, of medium to hard plastic
consistency, medium to high plasticity and medium to low compressibility.
This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of secondary
impurities, around 1-2 cm large sporadic CaCO3 concretions were 2.6
registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust.
2.9
g,pr
6.1 ap
GWT
4.2
cone
N=18
5.5-5.45
73.11 7.0
7.3
Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency,
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in 7.6
general of laminated texture, with irregular alternations of silt and silty sand
laminas. The medium is intensively moistened and water-saturated.
pr,p,m cone
3.9 аp N=12
9.0-9.45
69.21 10.9
Riverbed facies - silty-sandy gravel, grey in colour, fine to medium-grained,
grain sizes 0.5-2 cm with sporadic larger grains. The space between
gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various
petrological composition and the gravel is of medium to high density. The
medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
The interval 11.9-12.3 m shows higher sand content.
cone
N=46
15.0-15.45
š,p
12.1 ак
16.5
16.8
cone
N=71
18.0-18.45
03
САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ 02
01
No. Date Description
21.3 Revision block:
Client: Object:
Highway Kuzmin Sremska Rača border with
21.5
TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET the Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava
river
Organizational unit: Department of Geotechnical Engineering Део пројекта:
Geotechnical study
Authorized person: Internal control:
57.11 24.0 Цртеж: Scale:
Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol.
License number: 391 M042 13 Chief Designer: BOREHOLE LOG C-3
Associates: Dragoslav Dragićević, civ.eng.
1:100
Milos Rankovic, msc.geol. Head of the organizational unit: Design phase: Date: Drawing no.
Vladimir Filipović, msc.geol. PD / DBP 2019. 3.1
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
Topsoil - toposoiled clay with organic remains of plant roots.
0.9 h
79.29 0.9
impurities, around 1-2 cm large sporadic CaCO3 concretions were
4.0
g,pr GWT
6.8 ap 4.3 4.3
72.49 7.7
8.6
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in 8.9
pr,p,m laminas. The medium is intensively moistened and water-saturated.
3.5 аp
68.99 11.2
petrological composition. This medium is of smaller density at the top, in
the first 2 m, and of medium density at larger depths. It is of granular
porosity and water-saturated.
š,p 13.8
5.2 ак
14.0
63.79 16.4
Riverbed facies - fine-grained sand with sporadic gravel grains, grey in
cone
p colour, of small to medium density. The sand has uniform grain-size
2.0 ак N=32
distribution, it is poorly graded, with granular porosity and water-saturated. 17.5
17.0-17.45
61.79 18.0
Riverbed facies - fine-grained sand with sporadic gravel grains, grey in 17.7
colour, of small to medium density. The sand has uniform grain-size

distribution, it is poorly graded, with granular porosity and water-saturated.
03
01
š,p No. Date Description
6.0 ак Revision block:
21.5 Client: Object:
21.8 TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET the Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava
river
Geotechnical study
Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol. Цртеж: Scale:
1:100
55.79 24.0 Milos Rankovic, msc.geol. Head of the organizational unit: Design phase: Date: Drawing no.
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
1.0 h
79.30 1.0
registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust. 3.0
3.3
g,pr GWT
5.8 ap 3.8
cone
N=16
5.5-5.95
73.50 6.8
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in
pr,p,m
3.0 аp laminas. Silt was registered at the following depths: 6.8-7.1 m, 7.7-8.2 m
and 9.0-9.8 m, while silty sand was registered at the depths if 7.1-7.7 m
and 8.2-9.0 m. 9.3
70.50 9.8 9.5
Flood facies - silty to fine-grained sand, grey in colour, of small to medium

density. From 11.3-11.8 m the sand is fine-grained with sporadic gravel
аp
p,pr
grains. It has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly graded, with cone
2.0
granular porosity and water-saturated. N=27
11.8 11.0-11.45
68.50
the first 2 m, and of medium density at larger depths. It is of granular
14.0
In the interval from 12.0-12.5 m, a gravel interbed with tiny inclusions of 14.3
carbonised plant remains was registered.
cone
N=64
16.0-16.45
š,p
12.2 ак
03
cone INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o.
N=58 САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ 02
01
20.0-20.45 Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
Revision block:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
1.0 h
79.48 1.0
g,pr
4.6 ap 3.4
GWT
3.6
3.8
cone
N=16
4.4-5.95
74.88 5.6
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow in colour, of medium to hard plastic 6.4
pr,p,m This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of secondary 6.6
2.2 аp
72.68 7.8
Flood facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density. This
p,pr medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and
2.6 аp vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Silt 9.6
interbeds were registered at the following depths: 8.2-8.4 m, 8.6-8.8 m and
9.7-9.8 m. 9.8
70.08 10.4
gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various 11.8
the first 2 m, and of medium density at larger depths. It is of granular 12.0
cone
N=33
š,p 12.5-12.95
5.6 ак
64.48 16.0
p
Riverbed facies - fine grained sand, gray in colour, of small to medium
1.0 ак density. It has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly graded, with
63.48 17.0 granular porosity and water-saturated.
grain sizes 1-2 cm with sporadic larger grains up to 4cm. The space
between gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of
various petrological composition. It is of granular porosity and
water-saturated.
š,p
5.0 ак
03
20.0 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o.
01
cone 20.3 Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
N=53 Revision block:
Client:
20.7-21.15 Object:
58.48 22.0 river
Geotechnical study
1:100
MARK C-11 coordinate X 6602938.5 CHAINAGE. ----- KM
DEPTH (m') 26.0 START DATE 24.03.2019 MAPPED BY Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol.
PHOTOS OF THE BOREHOLE CORE C-11
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
79.13 0.3 0.3 h Topsoil - toposoiled clay with organic remains of plant roots.
g,pr GWT
5.4 ap 3.0
4.1
4.4
73.73 5.7
Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, конус
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in N=6
pr,p,m
general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical 6.0-6.45
2.3 аp alternations of silt and silty sand laminas.
71.43 8.0
medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and
p,pr
1.8 аp vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Silt
interbeds were registered at the following depths: 8.2-8.4 m, 8.6-8.8 m and
69.63 10.3 9.7-9.8 m. Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present
in the percentage of mush less than 10-20%.

grain sizes 2-3 cm with sporadic larger grains. The space between gravel
grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various petrological
composition. This medium is of smaller density at the top, in the first 2 m,
and of medium density at larger depths. It is of granular porosity and
water-saturated.
cone
N=25
13.5-13.95
15.4
15.7
š,p
14.2 ак
cone
N=29
03
19.5-19.95 САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ 02
01
21.2 Revision block:
Client: Object:
21.5
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
LITHOLOGICALl
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
DEPTH
AGW
GRAPHIC SPT
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
grain sizes 2-3 cm with sporadic larger grains up to 4cm. The space cone
š,p
ак between gravel grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of N=37
various petrological composition. This medium is of smaller density at the 24.6-25.05
top, in the first 2 m, and of medium density at larger depths.

53.43 26.0
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
0.5 h Topsoil - toposoiled clay with organic remains of plant roots.
80.66 0.5
3.0
g,pr
5.5 ap GWT
3.3
3.5
75.16 6.0
6.0
Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, cone
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in N=7 6.3
general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical 6.5-6.95
pr,p,m alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. From 8.5 m downwards,
3.2 аp increased percentage of silty sand was registered.
71.96 9.2
medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and 10.0
p,pr
2.0 аp vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas.
Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present in the 10.3
percentage of mush less than 10-20%. cone

N=19
69.76 11.4
Riverbed facies - silty-sandy gravel, grey in colour, fine to medium-grained, 11.0-11.45
š,p composition. This medium is of smaller density at the top, in the first 2 m,
4.6 ак and of medium density at larger depths. It is of granular porosity and
water-saturated.
cone
N=32
65.66 16.0
15.5-15.95
Riverbed facies - fine-grained sand, grey in colour, of small to medium
16.5
density. The sand has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly graded,
p
2.0 ак with granular porosity and water-saturated. 16.8
63.66 18.0
composition. This medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
03
01
š,p Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
6.0 ак
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
SERIAL - coordinate Y 4975131.6 DRILLED BY SI. CIP. d.о.о.
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
0.5 h Topsoil - toposoiled clay with organic remains of plant roots.
79.79 0.5
consistency, medium to high plasticity and medium to low compressibility. 1.3
1.6
registered, as well as Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust. In
g,pr the interval 4.0-4.9 m, this medium is intensively moistened, with increased
4.5 ap
content of sand and silt.
GWT
3.5
75.29 5.0
cone
N=4
5.2-5.6 6.0
general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical
alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. From 8.5 m downwards, 6.3
increased percentage of silty sand was registered.
pr,p,m
4.4 аp
70.89 9.4
p,pr medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and
1.6 аp vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Silt cone
interbeds were registered at the following depths: 8.2-8.4 m, 8.6-8.8 m and N=10
69.29 11.0
9.7-9.8 m. Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present 10.5-10.95
in the percentage of mush less than 10-20%.

š,p grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various petrological
4.3 ак composition. This medium is of smaller density at the top, in the first 2 m,
water-saturated.
64.99 15.3 cone

Riverbed facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density. N=6
This medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal 16.0
15.5-15.95
and vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas.
p 16.3
2.7 ак Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present in the
percentage of mush less than 10-20%.
62.29 18.0
composition. This medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
From 20.0 m, gravel is of higher density and gives stronger resistance to INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o. 03
02
drilling. САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ
01
š,p cone
Revision block:
6.0 ак N=30 Client:
21.8
Object:
20.4-20.95 TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET the Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava
21.5 river
Geotechnical study
cone Authorized person: Internal control:
N=54 Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol. Цртеж: Scale:
24.0-24.45 Associates: Dragoslav Dragićević, civ.eng.
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
1.0 h
79.80 1.0
This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of secondary 2.2
2.4
g,pr
4.4 ap
4.2
GWT
cone
4.2
N=10 4.4
4.4-5.95
75.40 5.4
general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical
alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. Out of secondary impurities,
pr,p,m
small fossilised remains of river fauna were registered in the form of small
4.4 аp inclusions of bivalves and gastropods. 7.8
8.0
71.00 9.8
Flood facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density. This 10.2
p,pr
1.1 аp medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and
10.4
69.90 10.9 vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. cone
Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present in the N=14
percentage of mush less than 10-20%. 11.0-11.45
š,p water-saturated
6.1 ак
15.2
15.6
17.0 cone
63.8
Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, N=13 17.3
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in 17.0-17.45
pr,p,m 17.6
2.0 аp general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical
alternations of silt and silty sand laminas.
61.80 19.0
p
Riverbed facies - silty sand, grey in colour, of small to medium density.
1.0 ак This medium is in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal
03
60.80 20.0 and vertical alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP, d.o.o.
Sand dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present in the Nemanjina 6; 11000 Belgrade; Serbija
01
percentage of mush less than 10-20%. No. Date Description
Revision block:
Riverbed facies - silty-sandy gravel, grey in colour, fine to medium-grained, Client:
Object:
š,p TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET the Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava
4.0 аk grains is filled with sand and silt. Gravel grains are of various petrological
river
Geotechnical study
water-saturated. cone 23.4 Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol. Цртеж: Scale:
From 22.5 m, somewhat larger-grained gravel of higher density was N=45 License number: 391 M042 13 Chief Designer: BOREHOLE LOG C-17
Associates: 1:100
56.80 25.0 registered. 24.2-24.65 23.6 Dragoslav Dragićević, civ.eng.
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
consistency, low to medium plasticity and medium to low compressibility.
g,pr
5.1 ap
3.3
3.6
GWT
4.2
75.40 5.1
Flood facies - silty sand, yellow in colour, of small density. This medium is
in general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical 6.0
alternations of sand laminas and thin and sporadic silt laminas. Sand
dominates in the mass compared to silt which is present in the percentage 6.3
of mush less than 10-20%. The sand is granular porosity, water-permeable
cone
and water-saturated.
N=8
From 9.8 m, sand is grey in colour, medium-grained with smaller
p,pr percentage of silt and of medium density. 7.4-7.85
6.7 аp
69.90 11.8 cone

N=19
grain sizes 2-3 cm with sporadic larger grains up to 6 cm. The space
12.0-12.45
various petrological composition. The gravel is of medium to high density.
It is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
Fine-grained gravel with a high percentage of sand is present down to 15.0 14.0
m and medium-grained gravel was registered at larger depths.
14.3
š,p
12.2 ак cone
N=41
18.0-18.45
03
01
20.7 Pho: 011/3618-134; Fax: 011/3618-324; web site: www.sicip.co.rs
Revision block:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
It is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
Fine-grained gravel with a high percentage of sand is present down to 15.0
cone
m and medium-grained gravel was registered at larger depths.
N=73
26.5-26.95
29.2
29.5
š,p
16.0 ак
cone
35.0
N=82
35.0-35.45 35.3
69.90 40.0
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m'
GWT N m'
-3.5
and of medium to high density at larger depths. From 15.0 m, it is of higher
density. The medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
In the interval from 0.0-6.0 m, the gravel is yellow-grey in colour.

In the interval from 6.0-8.0 m, the gravel is yellow-grey in colour, with
somewhat larger grains up to 5 cm.
4.3
From 22.0 m presence of large gravel grains was registered.

4.5
cone
N>50
12cm
5.0-5.12
8.7
cone
9.0
N=57
9.0-9.45
š,p
25.0 ак 13.8
14.0
cone
N=52
16.0-16.45
19.5
03
19.8
cone 01
N=80 No. Date Description
Revision block:
20.5-20.95 Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
MARK coordinate X 6602882 CHAINAGE. ----- KM
C-20
SERIAL coordinate Y
4974800 DRILLED BY SI. CIP. d.о.о.
-
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW
GRAPHIC SPT
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'

grain sizes 2-3 cm with sporadic larger grains. The space between gravel 26.0
26.3
š,p
5.0 ак and of medium to high density at larger depths. From 15.0 m, it is of higher cone
density. The medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated. N=87
27.0-27.45
44.72 30.0
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'

and of medium to high density at larger depths. From 15.0 m, it is of higher
density. The medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
In the interval from 0.0-1.7 m, the gravel is yellow-grey in colour.

In the interval from 6.0-8.0 m, the gravel is yellow-grey in colour, with
3.6
somewhat larger grains up to 5 cm.
3.8
From 21.0 m presence of large gravel grains was registered.
cone
N=31
5.0-5.45
6.2
6.4
cone
N=38
10.0-10.45
š,p
25.0 ак
14.2
14.4
cone
N=55
15.0-15.45
03
01
cone No. Date Description
Revision block:
N=61 21.6 Client: Object:
21.0-21.45
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
SPT
DEPTH
AGW
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'

grain sizes 2-3 cm with sporadic larger grains. The space between gravel 26.0
26.2
š,p
ак and of medium to high density at larger depths. From 15.0 m, it is of higher
density. This medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated. конус
N=79
27.5-27.95
29.1
29.4
44.80 30.0
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow-brown in colour, of medium to hard
plastic consistency, low to medium plasticity and medium to low
compressibility. This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of 1.1
secondary impurities, Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust

1.4
g,pr were registered.
4.0 ap
75.40 4.0
low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in GWT
general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical 4.7
alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. Out of secondary impurities, cone 5.6
N=5
pr,p,m small fossilised remains of river fauna were registered in the form of small
3.7 аp
inclusions of bivalves and gastropods. 5.5-5.95 5.8
75.40 7.7
Riverbed facies - medium-grained sand, grey in colour, of small to medium
p density. The sand has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly graded,
1.7 ак with granular porosity and water-saturated.
8.8
9.0
69.90 9.4
This medium is of granular porosity and water-saturated.
Down to 21.0 m, gravel is medium-grained.
cone
N=27
14.8-15.25
š,p
14.6 ак
16.8
cone
N=54 17.0
17.0-17.45
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
cone river
N=62 Organizational unit: Department of Geotechnical Engineering Део пројекта:
Geotechnical study
22.3-22.75 Цртеж: Scale:
Miodrag Pisarevic, msc.geol. Boško Ubiparip, msc.geol.
1:100
MARK coordinate X 6602878.4 CHAINAGE. ----- KM
C-22
SERIAL coordinate Y
4974563.4 DRILLED BY SI. CIP. d.о.о.
-
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW
GRAPHIC SPT
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
Down to 21.0 m, gravel is medium-grained. 27.3
27.5
cone
š,p
N=74
10.0 ак 29.2-29.65
44.72 30.0
03
01
Revision block:
Client: Object:
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
undisturb.sam.
disturb.sam.
ELEVATION
THICKNESS
LITHOLOGICALl
DEPTH
AGW SPT
GRAPHIC
MARK
VIEW
mnm' m' m' m' N m'
Flood facies - silty-sandy clay, yellow-brown in colour, of medium to hard
plastic consistency, low to medium plasticity and medium to low
compressibility. This medium is in general of laminated texture; out of 1.3
secondary impurities, Mn oxides and Fe hydroxides in the form of dust
were registered. 1.5
g,pr
4.2 ap
конус
N=11
3.5
3.0-3.45
75.40 4.2 3.8

Flood facies - sandy-muddy silt, grey in colour, of very soft consistency, 4.7
pr,p,m
1.2 аp low plasticity and high to extreme compressibility. This medium is in GWT
4.9
5.4 general of laminated texture, with irregular horizontal and vertical 4.9
75.40
alternations of silt and silty sand laminas. Out of secondary impurities,
small fossilised remains of river fauna were registered in the form of small 6.2
inclusions of bivalves and gastropods.
6.3
p
3.3 ак Riverbed facies - medium to coarse-grained sand, grey in colour, of small
to medium density. The sand has uniform grain-size distribution, it is poorly
graded, with granular porosity and water-saturated. Out of impurities, fossil cone
remains of river fauna were registered in the form of small inclusions of N=31
69.90 8.7 bivalves and gastropods.
8.2-8.65
various petrological composition. The gravel is of medium to high density. 10.5
Down to 10.5 m, gravel with somewhat larger grains up to 5 cm was 10.6
registered.
cone
N=42 15.4
15.0-15.45
15.6
š,p
15.3 ак
cone
N=54
17.0-17.45
19.3
19.6 03
01
Revision block:
Client:
cone
Object:
N=47 TASYAPI INSAAT TAAHHUT SANAYI VE TICARET the Republic of Srpska, bridge over the Sava
21.6-22.05
river
Geotechnical study
1:100
Annex 4
Diagrams and Results of CPTs
DOO "GEOMEHANIKA" ZA GEOTEHNIČKA ISTRAŽIVANJA I PROJEKTOVANJE
BEOGRAD, DOBROPOLJSKA 21,NOVI SAD, SENTANDREJSKI PUT 145A
LABORATORIJA ZA GEOMEHANIKU I GRAĐEVINSKE MATERIJALE

Akreditovana od Akreditacionog tela Srbije, br. rešenja: 01-198
IZVEŠTAJ BR. 19-04/13

DATUM: 08.04.2019.
IZVEŠTAJ
O REZULTATIMA TERENSKIH
GEOMEHANIČKIH ISPITIVANJA TLA
AUTOPUT KUZMIN SREMSKA RAČA, GRANICA SA

OBJEKAT:
REPUBLIKOM SRPSKOM
NAZIV I ADRESA „SAOBRAĆAJNI INSTITUT – CIP“
KORISNIKA: Beograd
MP DIREKTOR
Ivica Ivandić, dipl.ing.geol.
Novi Sad, April 2019.
Beograd: tel/fax: 011/265-32-22; 011/265-35-53, Novi Sad tel-fax:021/641-90-34; E-mail: office@geomehanika.rs, geomehanika@gmail.com
www.geomehanika.rs
DOO GEOMEHANIKA
Autoput Kuzmin Sremska Rača, granica sa Republikom Srpskom

Most preko Save
CPT - S 4
DIJAGRAM STATIČKE PENETRACIJE Dubina Depth : 17.60 m
CPT PROFILE SRPS EN ISO 22476-12:2011
qc - Otpor konusa Cone resistance
L - Sila bočnog trenja Lateral friction strength
F - Bočno trenje Sleeve friction
Rf - Frikcioni koeficijent Friction ratio
qc (MPa) F (MPa) Rf (%)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12 16 20
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
Dubina Depth (m)
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 20.03. 2019.

Ispitao Examined : B.Stanivuk Prilog br.
DOO GEOMEHANIKA
Autoput Kuzmin Sremska Rača, granica sa Republikom Srpskom,

Most preko Save
CPT - S 6

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12 16 20
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
Dubina Depth (m)
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 20.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12 16
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
Dubina Depth (m)
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 20.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 10

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 0 4 8 12 16
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
Dubina Depth (m)
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 20.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 13

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12 16
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
Dubina Depth (m)
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 21.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 14

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
Dubina Depth (m)
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 21.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 16

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
Dubina Depth (m)
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 21.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 18

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12 16
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
Dubina Depth (m)
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 21.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 19

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 0 4 8 12
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
Dubina Depth (m)
11 11 11
12 12 12
13 13 13
14 14 14
15 15 15
16 16 16
17 17 17
18 18 18
19 19 19
20 20 20
21 21 21
22 22 22
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 21.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 22

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
Dubina Depth (m)
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
12 12 12
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 22.03. 2019.

DOO GEOMEHANIKA

Most preko Save
CPT - S 24

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 0 4 8 12
0 0 0
1 1 1
2 2 2
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
Dubina Depth (m)
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
11 11 11
0 25 50 75 100
L (kN)
qc L
Datum Date : 22.03. 2019.

Annex 5
Overview of Results of Laboratory
Tests of Soil and Chemical Analysis of
Water and Assessed Aggressiveness to
Concrete
D O O "GEOMEHANIKA" ZA GEOTEHNIČKA ISTRAŽIVANJA
I PROJEKTOVANJE 11 000 BEOGRAD DOBROPOLJSKA 21
LABORATORIJA ZA GEOMEHANIKU I GRAĐEVINSKE MATERIJALE , NOVI SAD
ULICA SENTANDREJSKI PUT 145 A
IZVEŠTAJ BR. N 14/19

DATUM: 03/05/2019
IZVEŠTAJ
O REZULTATIMA LABORATORIJSKIH
GEOMEHANIČKIH ISPITIVANJA UZORAKA TLA
AUTOPUT KUZMIN-SREMSKA RAČA GRANICA SA

OBJEKAT:
REPUBLIKOM SRPSKOM OD KM 0+000 DO KM 20+923
NAZIV I ADRESA
KORISNIKA:
Saobraćajni institut „CIP“
RUKOVODILAC LABORATORIJE MP DIREKTOR
Bratislav Mudroh, građ.tehn. Ivica Ivandić, dipl.ing.geol.
Beograd: tel/fax:011/265-3222; 021/641-9034 E-mail: geomehanika@gmail.com
Strana 1 od 113
Izveštaj br. N 14/19
IZVEŠTAJ Datum: 03.05.2019
Predmet: Laboratorijska geomehanička ispitivanja uzoraka tla
Korisnik: »Cip« Saobraćajni institut

Adresa: Beograd, Nemanjina br.6/IV
Broj zahteva: N 14/19

Datum: 26.03.2019
Uzorkovanje izvršio: Korisnik

Lokacija: Autoput Kuzmin Sremska Rača
Datum: Tokom februara i marta.2019.
Datum prijema uzoraka: 26.03.2019

Broj primljenih uzoraka: 65
Broj ispitanih uzoraka: 65
Period ispitivanja:
Identifikacija uzoraka: Osnovni lab.br. N19/14

-Određivanje vlažnosti uzoraka SRPS U.B1.012 – ''povučen''
-Aterbergove granice konzistencije SRPS U.B1.020 - ''povučen''
-Specifična težina SRPS U.B1.014 - ''povučen''
-Odrađivanje granulometrijskog sastava SRPS U.B1.018 - ''povučen''
Metode ispitivanja: određivanje direktnog smicanja SRPS U.B1.028 –»povučen«
-određivanje edometarskog modula stišljivosti SRPS U.B1.032 –
»povučen«
Rezultati ispitivanja: Prikazani na pojedinačnim prilozima
Jovan Stanivuk, građ.teh.

Ispitivanja izvršili:
Zoran Čolaković laborant.
Podatke obradili: Jovan Stanivuk, građ.teh.
Izveštaj preispitao: Bratislav Mudroh, građ.tehn.
Dati rezultati se odnose na ispitivane uzorke dobijene od

korisnika.
Napomena: Zabranjeno je reprodukovanje izveštaja bez odobrenja
Geomehanike, osim kao celine.
Strana 2 od 113
Izveštaj br. N 14/19
IZVEŠTAJ Datum: 03.05.2019
OPIT OPREMA
Redni
Naziv opita Standard
Broj Oznaka Naziv
NS.M.O.3.1 vaga tacnosti 0.01g
SRPS susnica osetljivosti 1C I
1. Određivanje vlažnosti uzoraka tla U.B1.012- NS.L.O.2.1 sa mogucnoscu
povučen odrzavanja temperature
od 110+-5C
Određivanje zapreminske mase
SRPS
2. materijala tla metodom sa cilindrom NS.M.O.3.1 vaga tacnosti 0.01g
U.B1.013-
poznate zapremine
NS.M.O.3.2 vaga tačnosti 0.5 g
SRPS NS.M.O.3.1 vaga tačnosti 0.01g
Određivanje granulometrijskog
3. U.B1.018- NS.L.O.13.40-
sastava komplet sita
povučen 13.54
NS.M.O.1.1 hidrometar
SRPS
Određivanje konzistencije tla –
4. U.B1.020- NS.L.O.24.1 Casagrandeov aparat
Aterbergove granice
povučen
SRPS
određivanje direktnog smicanja
5, U.B1.028 – NS.L.O. 19,3 Aparat za smicanje
»povučen«
određivanje edometarskog modula SRPS

6. stišljivosti U.B1.032 – NS.L.O. 24,1 Edometarski aparat
»povučen«
Strana 3 od 113
TABELARNI PREGLED LABORATORIJSKIH GEOMEHANIČKIH ISPITIVANJA / TABLE OF GEOMECHANICAL TEST RESULTS
AUTOPUT KUZMIN-SREMSKA RAČA GRANICA SA REPUBLIKOM SRPSKOM OD KM 0+000 DO KM 20+923
DIREKTNO KOEFICIJENT
FIZIČKA GRANICE GRANULOMETRIJSKI
OZNAKA UZORKA SMICANJE / VODOPROPUSNOSTI/ MODULI EDOMETARSKE STIŠLJIVOSTI /
SVOJSTVA/ KONZISTENCIJE / SASTAV /
LABORATORIJSKI BROJ /
SAMPLE MARK Direct shear Water permeability Oedometer compressibility modulus KLASIFIKACIJA
Phisycal properties Consistency limits Particle size distribution
Laboratory ID number
test coefficient TLA / Soil

Classification
Hazen
USBR
Gravel
Sand
Clay
γd
Silt
/ γ w wl wp Ip Ic c' ϕ' OPTEREĆENJE / Load σ (kPa)
%0.06-0.002mm
%2.00-0.06mm
%<0.002 mm
%>2.00 mm
AASHTO
DUBINA / DEPTH
USC
cm/s
kN/m3 % % - kPa o Ms (kPa)
(m)
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-294 C-3 / 2.60-2.90 20.91 16.97 23.30 35.60 22.10 13.50 0.91 10.56 84.51 4.93 12 22 1.65E-06 4.20E-06 A-6(13) CL
6333 5236 8486 10543 12483
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-295 C-3 / 7.30-7.60 19.09 14.23 34.10 55.20 29.90 25.30 0.83 19.83 78.44 1.74 18 19 3.04E-07 2.08E-06 A-7-6(30) MH
1852 2703 4659 5579 9010
N19/14-296 C-3/16.50-16.80 6.84 1.23 31.66 67.12 1.50E-02 1.75E-02 A-1a GP
N19/14-297 C-3 / 21.30-21.50 6.80 11.14 30.29 58.57 1.15E-02 3.02E-03 A-1a GM
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-298 C-5 / 4.00-4.30 19.77 15.56 27.00 34.20 22.90 11.30 0.64 10.59 86.96 2.31 0.14 16 21 9.22E-07 5.16E-06 A-6(11) CL
5263 7075 7565 9954 13347
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-299 C-5 / 8.60-8.90 17.42 12.24 42.30 58.60 33.50 25.10 0.65 20.42 74.58 5.00 0.00 14 17 2.80E-07 2.23E-06 A-7-5(30) MH
896 1831 2493 4589 7120
N19/14-300 C-5 / 13.80-14.00 6.10 11.64 29.93 58.43 1.05E-02 3.02E-03 A-1a GM
N19/14-301 C-5/17.50-17.70 19.40 3.40 96.58 0.02 3.61E-03 1.09E-02 A-2-4(0) SC-SM
N19/14-302 C-5 / 21.50-21.80 6.40 4.26 16.09 79.66 1.61E+00 1.32E-01 A-1a GP
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-303 C-7 / 3.00-3.30 20.57 16.68 23.30 36.20 22.70 13.50 0.96 9.58 87.44 2.98 15 22 1.25E-06 5.77E-06 A-6(14) CL
7143 9027 10395 11506 16357
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-304 C-7 / 9.30-9.50 19.32 15.01 28.70 35.80 22.60 13.20 0.54 11.22 83.39 5.35 0.04 16 21 8.58E-07 4.46E-06 A-6(13) CL
1053 1905 2650 4890 7871
N19/14-305 C-7 / 14.00-14.30 4.70 3.93 17.55 78.52 1.11E+00 1.48E-01 A-1a GP
N19/14-306 C-7 / 21.50-21.70 7.20 7.93 21.85 70.22 1.01E-01 1.97E-02 A-1a GC-GM
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-307 C-9 / 3.40-3.60 20.26 16.04 26.30 46.20 25.80 20.40 0.98 13.77 84.41 1.82 0.00 18 20 7.97E-07 2.28E-06 A-7-6(23) CL
2021 3431 5890 8756 11892
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-308 C-9 / 6.40-6.60 17.68 13.36 32.30 55.60 30.20 25.40 0.92 18.79 74.40 6.81 0.00 20 17 3.58E-07 2.14E-06 A-7-5(28) MH
941 2249 4188 7631 9420
Obradio:
prilog br.
Strana 4 od 113

Classification
Hazen
USBR
Gravel
Sand
Clay
γd
Silt
%0.06-0.002mm
%2.00-0.06mm
%<0.002 mm
%>2.00 mm
AASHTO
DUBINA / DEPTH
USC
cm/s
(m)
50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-309 C-9 / 9.60-9.80 29.00 6.71 44.82 48.47 0.00 9.01E-06 1.65E-05 A-4(0) ML
N19/14-310 C-9 / 11.80-12.00 9.80 12.51 39.55 47.94 8.65E-03 3.02E-03 A-1b SM
N19/14-311 C-9 / 20.00-20.30 6.70 8.93 28.54 62.53 3.45E-02 4.83E-03 A-1a GC-GM
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-312 C-11 / 4.10-4.40 20.62 16.63 23.39 34.20 22.00 12.20 0.89 7.18 79.59 13.22 16 19 3.10E-06 1.32E-05 A-6(11) CL
3065 4248 5772 12100 15867
N19/14-313 C-11 / 15.40-15.70 6.50 12.93 37.23 49.85 9.37E-03 3.02E-03 A-1b GM
N19/14-314 C-11 / 21.20-21.50 5.20 1.36 31.13 67.50 6.88E-02 4.83E-02 A-1a GW
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-315 C-12/3.00-3.30 20.52 16.99 20.82 35.20 23.40 11.80 1.22 7.47 78.80 13.29 0.44 15 22 2.50E-06 7.94E-06 A-6(10) CL
5278 10456 9365 10589 16912
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-316 C-12 / 6.00-6.30 18.52 13.72 34.95 36.50 23.10 13.40 0.11 9.01 88.73 2.26 9 22 1.53E-06 6.45E-06 A-6(14) CL
769 2226 3584 5641 11620
N19/14-317 C-12 / 10.00-10.30 22.00 3.87 96.10 0.03 5.71E-03 1.29E-02 A-2-4(0) SC-SM
N19/14-318 C-12/16.50-16.80 17.00 2.40 70.61 26.98 1.50E-02 1.88E-02 A-1b SP
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-319 C-15 / 1.30-1.60 20.49 17.03 20.30 33.20 21.40 11.80 1.09 3.89 72.69 22.96 0.46 7 25 5.74E-06 1.71E-05 A-6(9) CL
2222 2384 3906 7460 9553
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-320 C-15/6.00-6.30 19.89 15.24 30.49 38.20 23.60 14.60 0.53 12.29 81.30 6.31 0.10 16 20 1.51E-06 2.43E-06 A-6(15) CL
2381 2719 4470 5293 8409
N19/14-321 C-15 / 16.00-16.30 26.30 4.00 95.78 0.22 2.24E-03 6.88E-03 A-2-4(0) SC-SM
N19/14-322 C-15 / 21.50-21.80 6.80 4.07 18.40 36.83 40.70 3.38E-04 5.59E-04 A-1b SM
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-323 C-17 / 2.20-2.40 19.92 16.32 22.00 35.20 22.90 12.30 1.07 5.68 89.29 5.02 0.02 14 22 2.25E-06 9.91E-06 A-6(12) CL
2568 4234 5579 8218 10226
Obradio:
prilog br.
Strana 5 od 113

Classification
Hazen
USBR
Gravel
Sand
Clay
γd
Silt
%0.06-0.002mm
%2.00-0.06mm
%<0.002 mm
%>2.00 mm
AASHTO
DUBINA / DEPTH
USC
cm/s
(m)
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-324 C-17 / 4.20-4.40 20.06 16.01 25.30 32.20 21.00 11.20 0.62 3.58 84.43 11.40 0.60 15 21 5.17E-06 2.32E-05 A-6(10) CL
1235 5644 7315 11370 14455
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-325 C-17/7.80-8.00 19.56 15.08 29.70 36.80 22.90 13.90 0.51 8.64 82.32 8.94 0.10 15 20 2.43E-06 7.13E-06 A-6(13) CL
1471 3715 4887 7620 9962
N19/14-326 C-17 / 10.20-10.40 23.70 1.64 98.36 3.46E-03 1.04E-02 A-2-4(0) SC-SM
N19/14-327 C-17 / 15.20-15.60 7.60 0.82 44.09 55.09 3.75E-02 4.00E-02 A-1a SP
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-328 C-17 / 17.30-17.60 19.02 13.97 36.00 38.50 25.50 13.00 0.19 8.04 82.41 9.29 0.26 12 23 2.60E-06 8.17E-06 A-6(13) ML
1020 3170 4566 6781 9872
N19/14-329 C-17 / 23.40-23.60 5.80 2.26 40.08 57.66 4.59E-02 5.77E-02 A-1a GP
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-330 C-19 / 3.30-3.60 20.17 16.52 22.10 34.20 21.80 12.40 0.98 6.04 89.21 4.14 0.62 16 21 2.61E-06 1.12E-05 A-6(12) CL
5263 5503 7550 7596 8981
N19/14-331 C-19 / 6.00-6.30 30.38 22.94 76.09 8.32E-04 2.07E-03 A-4(0) SM
N19/14-332 C-19 / 14.00-14.30 7.30 3.57 11.71 37.05 47.67 1.32E-03 4.22E-03 A-1b SM
N19/14-333 C-19 / 20.70-21.00 5.30 1.11 47.84 51.04 2.00E-02 3.19E-02 A-1a GP
N19/14-334 C-19 / 29.20-29.50 5.90 6.32 11.30 37.78 44.61 1.02E-03 2.02E-05 A-1b SM
N19/14-335 C-19/35.00-35.30 5.50 3.76 13.24 31.99 51.01 2.03E-03 6.82E-04 A-1b GM
N19/14-336 C-20 / 4.30-4.50 7.90 4.57 13.19 33.63 48.61 1.25E-03 2.56E-04 A-1b SM
N19/14-337 C-20/8.70-9.00 7.18 4.67 12.98 37.84 44.52 1.34E-03 3.70E-04 A-1b SM
N19/14-338 C-20 / 13.80-14.00 7.40 3.50 13.25 39.04 44.21 1.24E-03 1.47E-04 A-1b SM
Obradio:
prilog br.
Strana 6 od 113

Classification
Hazen
USBR
Gravel
Sand
Clay
γd
Silt
%0.06-0.002mm
%2.00-0.06mm
%<0.002 mm
%>2.00 mm
AASHTO
DUBINA / DEPTH
USC
cm/s
(m)
50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-339 C-20 / 19.50-19.80 4.70 1.50 8.50 31.12 58.88 1.33E-02 4.90E-03 A-1a GC-GM
N19/14-340 C-20 / 26.00-26.30 5.90 6.21 8.65 29.69 55.45 3.69E-03 6.90E-04 A-1b GM
N19/14-341 C-21 / 3.60-3.80 6.60 1.40 9.88 35.92 52.80 6.82E-03 3.02E-03 A-1b SM
N19/14-342 C-21 / 6.20-6.40 7.80 3.00 20.63 46.39 29.99 1.96E-04 1.62E-04 A-2-4(0) SM
N19/14-343 C-21 / 14.20-14.40 6.30 0.75 7.81 23.28 68.16 6.26E-02 4.90E-03 A-1a GC-GM
N19/14-344 C-21 / 21.60-21.70 4.60 1.93 39.86 58.21 1.05E-01 6.32E-02 A-1a GP
N19/14-345 C-21 / 26.00-26.20 6.40 4.57 14.59 37.47 43.37 6.62E-04 2.56E-04 A-1b SM
N19/14-346 C-21 / 29.10-29.40 6.90 6.24 11.18 40.87 41.71 1.23E-03 3.57E-04 A-1b SM
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-347 C-22 / 1.10-1.40 19.30 15.04 28.30 36.50 23.90 12.60 0.65 13.01 84.29 2.70 6.75E-07 3.08E-06 A-6(13) CL
7917 8582 9385 12807 15233
N19/14-348 C-22 / 5.60-5.80 35.30 2.24 53.08 44.68 4.10E-05 7.71E-05 A-4(0) ML
N19/14-349 C-22 / 8.80-9.00 8.70 1.16 70.04 28.80 4.39E-02 4.08E-02 A-1b SW
N19/14-350 C-22 / 16.80-17.00 7.70 1.16 55.69 43.15 2.91E-02 3.16E-02 A-1b SP
N19/14-351 C-22 / 27.30-27.50 4.80 6.47 20.60 72.93 1.76E-01 2.41E-02 A-1a GC-GM
N19/14-352 C-24/1.30-1.50 19.81 15.58 27.16 34.20 21.60 12.60 0.56 4.02 85.92 10.02 0.04 4.93E-06 1.86E-05 A-6(12) CL
0 50 100 200 400 800
N19/14-353 C-24 / 3.50-3.80 19.29 14.85 30.00 34.50 21.20 13.30 0.34 3.16 82.75 12.72 1.38 6.20E-06 2.84E-05 A-6(11) CL
1979 2987 3959 6228 9414
Obradio:
prilog br.
Strana 7 od 113

Classification
Hazen
USBR
Gravel
Sand
Clay
γd
Silt
%0.06-0.002mm
%2.00-0.06mm
%<0.002 mm
%>2.00 mm
AASHTO
DUBINA / DEPTH
USC
cm/s
(m)
0 50 100 200 400 800

N19/14-354 C-24 / 4.70-4.90 19.12 14.30 33.70 35.20 21.60 13.60 0.11 2.70 75.37 21.74 0.18 11 23 1.62E-05 5.84E-05 A-6(11) CL
1218 3504 4605 7171 12891
N19/14-355 C-24 / 6.20-6.30 15.60 1.30 86.53 12.17 4.92E-02 7.68E-02 A-1b SP
N19/14-356 C-24/10.50-10.60 7.38 11.19 33.65 55.16 1.36E-02 3.02E-03 A-1a GM
N19/14-357 C-24 / 15.40-15.60 6.50 14.81 37.48 47.71 2.52E-03 4.22E-03 A-1b SM
N19/14-358 C-24 / 19.30-19.60 5.70 12.92 33.56 53.52 6.35E-03 3.02E-03 A-1b GM
Obradio:
prilog br.
Strana 8 od 113
LABORATORIJA ZA GEOMEHANIKU
I GRAĐEVINSKE MATERIJALE
LABORATORY FOR GEOMECHANICS
AND BUILDING MATERIALS
IDENTIFIKACIONO-KLASIFIKACIONE KARAKTERISTIKE MATERIJALA
IDENTIFICATION-CLASIFICATION TEST RESULTS
Metode ispitivanja / Testing methods : SRPS.U.B1.012:'79. - ''povučen'', SRPS.U.B1.013:'92. - ''povučen'',
SRPS.U.B1.018:'05. - ''povučen'', SRPS.U.B1.020:'80. - ''povučen''
OBJEKAT / OBJECT : Autoput Kuzmin Sr. Raca granica sa Rep. Srpskom Lab. Br. / ID
LOKACIJA/LOCATION : od km 0+000 do km 20+923 N19/14-294
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-3 / 2.60-2.90
DIJAGRAM GRANULOMETRIJSKOG SASTAVA / PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
PRAŠINA / SILT PESAK / SAND ŠLJUNAK / GRAVEL
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/
SITNA/ KRUPNA/ SITAN / SREDNJI/ KRUPAN / SITAN / SREDNJI/ KRUPAN/
Procenat čestica sitnijih od " D " (%)
110 FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE FINE COARSE

Particles percent finer than ''D'' (%)
MEDIUM COARSE MEDIUM

0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Prečnik sita / Grain diameter " D " (mm)
DIJAGRAM PLASTIČNOSTI / PLASTICITY CHART AASHTO DIJAGRAM PLASTIČNOSTI / PLASTICITY CHART USCS
70 70
Indeks plastičnosti / Plasticity index Ip (%)
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Granica tečenja/ Liquid limit ωL (%) Granica tečenja/ Liquid limit ωL (%)
VLAŽNOST/
PREČNIK SITA /SIEVE DIAMETER D (mm) ATERBERGOVE GRANICE / ATTERBERG LIMITS
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
% ČESTICA SITNIJIH OD / PARTICLES PERCENT FINER THAN D (mm) (%) (%) (%) (%)
100.0 100.0 99.3 96.8 95.1 10.6 35.6 22.1 13.5 0.911 23.3
KOEFICIJENT/ COEFFICIENT KLASIFIKACIJA
PRIRODNA ZAPREMINSKA SUVA ZAPREMINSKA
neravnomern./unequalness zakrivljenosti/ curvature CLASSIFICATION TEZINA / BULK DENSITY TEZINA / DRY DENSITY
Cu = D60/D10 Cc=D302/(D60*D10) AASHTO USCS Y (kN/m3) Yd (kN/m3)
8.3 1.4 A-6(13) CL 20.91 16.97

Koloidna aktivnost/ colloidal activity 1.28 Koeficijent filtracije / filtration coefficient (cm/s)
/ A / Aktivna glina USBR 1.65E-06 Hazen 4.20E-06
Overio / Datum / April/ Prilog br./

Approved : Date : Apryl 2019 Enclosure no.
obr.1 izdanje/izmena:2/0 datum izdanja:20.01.2011. strana 1/1
Strana 9 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 100.0 99.6 98.3 19.8 55.2 29.9 25.3 0.834 34.1
6.7 0.9 A-7-6(30) MH 19.09 14.23


Strana 10 od 113
LOKACIJA/LOCATION : od km 0+000 do km 20+923 N18 / 14-296
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-3/16.50-16.80

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
47.5 32.9 21.6 2.2 1.2 6.8
29.0 0.6 A-1a GP

Koloidna aktivnost/ colloidal activity / Koeficijent filtracije / filtration coefficient (cm/s)

Strana 11 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-3 / 21.30-21.50

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
62.7 41.4 26.5 12.8 11.1 6.8
85.1 1.6 A-1a GM


Strana 12 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.9 99.2 97.7 97.6 10.6 34.2 22.9 11.3 0.637 27.0
5.4 1.2 A-6(11) CL 19.77 15.56

/ A / Normalna glina USBR 9.22E-07 Hazen 5.16E-06

Strana 13 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 98.6 95.9 95.0 20.4 58.6 33.5 25.1 0.649 42.3
5.4 1.1 A-7-5(30) MH 17.42 12.24


Strana 14 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-5 / 13.80-14.00

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
55.7 41.6 27.5 13.1 11.6 6.1
112.6 0.9 A-1a GM


Strana 15 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 95.8 7.8 3.4 19.4
2.1 1.2 A-2-4(0) SC-SM


Strana 16 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-5 / 21.50-21.80

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
30.9 20.3 11.4 4.6 4.3 6.4
43.0 4.1 A-1a GP

/ A / Aktivna glina USBR 1.61E+00 Hazen 1.32E-01

Strana 17 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.7 98.3 97.0 9.6 36.2 22.7 13.5 0.956 23.3
4.8 1.7 A-6(14) CL 20.57 16.68


Strana 18 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.8 96.7 94.6 11.2 35.8 22.6 13.2 0.538 28.7
5.9 1.3 A-6(13) CL 19.32 15.01


Strana 19 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-7 / 14.00-14.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
32.3 21.5 11.2 4.3 3.9 4.7
31.2 4.3 A-1a GP

/ A / Aktivna glina USBR 1.11E+00 Hazen 1.48E-01

Strana 20 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-7 / 21.50-21.70

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
42.9 29.8 17.9 8.3 7.9 7.2
68.0 3.2 A-1a GC-GM


Strana 21 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.7 99.0 98.2 13.8 46.2 25.8 20.4 0.975 26.3
7.1 1.8 A-7-6(23) CL 20.26 16.04


Strana 22 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.9 94.7 93.2 18.8 55.6 30.2 25.4 0.917 32.3
7.1 1.0 A-7-5(28) MH 17.68 13.36


Strana 23 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 90.1 55.8 51.5 6.7 29.0
31.9 0.7 A-4(0) ML

/ A / Neaktivna glina USBR 9.01E-06 Hazen 1.65E-05

Strana 24 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-9 / 11.80-12.00

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
64.9 52.1 33.4 14.2 12.5 9.8
68.6 0.7 A-1b SM


Strana 25 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-9 / 20.00-20.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
52.5 37.5 23.9 10.3 8.9 6.7
95.6 1.4 A-1a GC-GM


Strana 26 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.5 91.4 86.8 7.2 34.2 22.0 12.2 0.886 23.4
12.6 1.2 A-6(11) CL 20.62 16.63


Strana 27 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-11 / 15.40-15.70

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
63.7 50.2 31.2 13.9 12.9 6.5
72.7 0.8 A-1b GM


Strana 28 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-11 / 21.20-21.50

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
45.3 32.5 18.6 2.0 1.4 5.2
39.9 1.2 A-1a GW


Strana 29 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.6 97.8 89.3 86.3 7.5 35.2 23.4 11.8 1.219 20.8
10.8 1.2 A-6(10) CL 20.52 16.99


Strana 30 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.9 98.8 97.7 9.0 36.5 23.1 13.4 0.112 35.0
5.9 1.2 A-6(14) CL


Strana 31 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-12 / 10.00-10.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 89.1 6.2 3.9 22.0
2.2 1.4 A-2-4(0) SC-SM


Strana 32 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
82.3 73.0 43.8 4.5 2.4 17.0
5.6 1.2 A-1b SP


Strana 33 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.5 96.9 83.3 76.6 3.9 33.2 21.4 11.8 1.093 20.3
12.5 1.1 A-6(9) CL 20.49 17.03


Strana 34 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-15 /6.00-6.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.9 98.2 96.0 93.6 12.3 38.2 23.6 14.6 0.528 30.5
16.9 1.8 A-6(15) CL 19.89 15.24


Strana 35 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-15 / 16.00-16.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.8 94.2 10.1 4.0 26.3
2.4 1.0 A-2-4(0) SC-SM


Strana 36 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-15 / 21.50-21.80

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
72.5 59.3 40.0 24.2 22.5 4.1 6.8
90.8 0.6 A-1b SM


Strana 37 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.0 96.7 95.0 5.7 35.2 22.9 12.3 1.073 22.0
3.9 1.5 A-6(12) CL 19.92 16.32


Strana 38 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.4 97.4 92.0 88.0 3.6 32.2 21.0 11.2 0.616 25.3
7.6 0.7 A-6(10) CL 20.06 16.01


Strana 39 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.9 98.2 93.9 91.0 8.6 36.8 22.9 13.9 0.511 29.7
11.0 1.1 A-6(13) CL 19.56 15.08


Strana 40 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17 / 10.20-10.40

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 98.3 6.4 1.6 23.7
2.1 1.2 A-2-4(0) SC-SM


Strana 41 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17 / 15.20-15.60

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
59.8 44.9 25.7 1.9 0.8 7.6
25.7 0.3 A-1a SP


Strana 42 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17 / 17.30-17.60

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.7 99.6 93.3 90.4 8.0 38.5 25.5 13.0 0.192 36.0
9.0 0.9 A-6(13) ML 19.02 13.97


Strana 43 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17 / 23.40-23.60

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
54.2 42.3 24.7 3.0 2.3 5.8
27.8 0.2 A-1a GP


Strana 44 od 113
LOKACIJA/LOCATION : Autoput Kuzmin - Sremska Raca N19/14-330

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.4 98.4 96.5 95.2 6.0 34.2 21.8 12.4 0.976 22.1
5.5 0.9 A-6(12) CL 20.17 16.52


Strana 45 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 100.0 37.1 23.9 1.0 30.4
3.3 0.6 A-4(0) SM


Strana 46 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-19 / 14.00-14.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
65.4 52.3 35.9 17.7 15.3 3.6 7.3
103.3 0.6 A-1b SM


Strana 47 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-19 / 20.70-21.00

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
63.1 49.0 28.6 2.2 1.1 5.3
24.3 0.3 A-1a GP


Strana 48 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-19 / 29.20-29.50

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
69.3 55.4 34.6 19.9 17.6 6.3 5.9
638.3 5.7 A-1b SM


Strana 49 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
60.0 49.0 34.0 18.4 17.0 3.8 5.5
192.7 0.7 A-1b GM


Strana 50 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
66.3 51.4 34.7 19.5 17.8 4.6 7.9
225.0 1.5 A-1b SM


Strana 51 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
69.0 55.5 38.5 19.4 17.6 4.7 7.2
151.1 1.0 A-1b SM


Strana 52 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-20 / 13.80-14.00

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
75.0 55.8 36.8 19.4 16.8 3.5 7.4
218.7 1.8 A-1b SM


Strana 53 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-20 / 19.50-19.80

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
51.7 41.1 25.1 10.4 10.0 1.5 4.7
117.8 1.0 A-1a GC-GM


Strana 54 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-20 / 26.00-26.30

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
53.9 44.6 29.8 16.8 14.9 6.2 5.9
296.2 1.0 A-1b SM


Strana 55 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
62.1 47.2 31.0 14.4 11.3 1.4 6.6
80.7 0.7 A-1b GM


Strana 56 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
89.8 70.0 45.0 25.9 23.6 3.0 7.8
80.0 0.9 A-2-4(0) SM


Strana 57 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-21 / 14.20-14.40

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
47.4 31.8 19.6 10.4 8.6 0.7 6.3
110.7 5.2 A-1a GC-GM


Strana 58 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-21 / 21.60-21.70

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
55.5 41.8 16.3 2.8 1.9 4.6
25.6 0.6 A-1a GP


Strana 59 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-21 / 26.00-26.20

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
69.9 56.6 37.8 22.0 19.2 4.6 6.4
167.3 1.0 A-1b SM


Strana 60 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-21 / 29.10-29.40

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
72.7 58.3 34.7 19.5 17.4 6.2 6.9
123.3 2.1 A-1b SM


Strana 61 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.9 99.2 97.3 13.0 36.5 23.9 12.6 0.651 28.3
7.9 1.1 A-6(13) CL 19.30 15.04


Strana 62 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.9 64.2 55.3 2.2 35.3
7.9 2.1 A-4(0) ML


Strana 63 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
94.2 71.2 22.8 2.0 1.2 8.7
7.5 1.3 A-1b SW


Strana 64 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-22 / 16.80-17.00

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
71.3 56.8 26.9 2.1 1.2 7.7
14.7 0.5 A-1b SP


Strana 65 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-22 / 27.30-27.50

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
35.4 27.1 16.6 7.5 6.5 4.8
120.8 3.1 A-1a GC-GM


Strana 66 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 100.0 99.2 93.7 89.9 4.0 34.2 21.6 12.6 0.559 27.2
7.1 0.9 A-6(12) CL 19.81 15.58


Strana 67 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 98.6 96.1 89.9 85.9 3.2 34.5 21.2 13.3 0.338 30.0
6.7 0.9 A-6(11) CL 19.29 14.85


Strana 68 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
100.0 99.8 99.5 85.2 78.1 2.7 35.2 21.6 13.6 0.110 33.7
6.7 1.1 A-6(11) CL 19.12 14.30


Strana 69 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
99.5 87.8 24.5 1.7 1.3 15.6
3.3 1.0 A-1b SP


Strana 70 od 113

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
60.1 44.8 26.4 12.1 11.2 7.4
91.8 1.3 A-1a GM


Strana 71 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-24 / 15.40-15.60

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
66.0 52.3 33.7 16.8 14.8 6.5
65.5 0.6 A-1b SM


Strana 72 od 113
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-24 / 19.30-19.60

130
DROBINA/
COBBLES
GLINA/
CLAY
120 SREDNJA/


0,002 0,006 0.02 0,06 0,2 0,6 2,0 6,0 20,0 60,0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
70 70
65
60 60
55
50 50
0
-3
45 CH
L
=W
40 40
IP
35
A7-6 30
30
25 A6 OH ili MH
20 20 CL
A2-6 A
15
A2-7 7-5 CL
10 10
A4 A5
5 A2-4 CL-ML
A2-5 ML
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
VLAŽNOST/
MOISTURE
4.75 2 0.425 0.075 0.06 0.002 ωL ωP IP Ic ω
61.2 46.5 30.2 15.0 12.9 5.7
86.9 0.7 A-1b SM


Strana 73 od 113
LABORATORY FOR GEOMECHANICS AND BUILDING MATERIALS
DIREKTNO SMICANJE / DIRECT SHEAR TEST

Metoda ispitivanja / Testing method : SRPS U.B1.028:1996. - ''povčen''
OBJEKAT / OBJECT : Autoput Kuzmin Sr. Raca granica sa Rep. Srpskom Lab. Broj / ID: N19/14-294
LOKACIJA/LOCATION : od km 0+000 do km 20+923
200
□ Kriterijum loma
Tangencijalni napon / Shear stress τ (kN/m2)
150
τ max δ σ
(kN/m2) (mm) (kN/m2)
32 2.50 50
100 52 2.50 100
97 4.00 200
50 □ Rezultati ispitivanja / Testing results
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.91 16.97 23.30 12.00 22.00
0 50 100 150 200
Normalni napon / Vertical stress σ (kN/m2)
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
Tangecijalni napon / Shear stress
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40 σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Horizontalna deformacija / Horisontal displacement δ (mm)

Approved: Date: Apryl 2019 Enclosure no.
Strana 74 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
32 3.00 50
100 50 3.00 100
85 3.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m2 (o)
0
19.09 14.23 34.10 18.00 19.00
0 50 100 150 200
140
120
τ (kN/m2)
100
80
σ3=200kN/m2
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 75 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
35 2.50 50
100 49 2.50 100
91 4.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.77 15.56 27.00 16.00 21.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 76 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
28 3.00 50
100 42 2.50 100
75 4.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
17.42 12.24 42.30 14.00 17.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
80 σ3=200kN/m2
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 77 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
35 1.80 50
100 60 1.80 100
93 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.57 16.68 23.30 15.00 22.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
σ2=100 kN/m2
60
σ1=50 kN/m2
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 78 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
35 1.80 50
100 54 2.00 100
92 3.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.32 15.01 27.80 16.00 21.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
σ2=100 kN/m2
60
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 79 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
37 2.50 50
100 55 2.00 100
88 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.26 16.04 26.30 18.00 20.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
80
σ3=200kN/m2
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 80 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
36 2.00 50
100 55 1.80 100
80 3.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
17.68 13.36 32.30 20.00 17.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
80 σ3=200kN/m2
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 81 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
34 2.00 50
100 55 2.00 100
87 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.62 16.63 23.39 16.00 19.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
80 σ3=200kN/m2
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 82 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
33 3.00 50
100 56 2.50 100
97 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.52 16.99 20.82 15.00 22.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60 σ2=100 kN/m2
40 σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 83 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
26 3.00 50
100 44 3.50 100
94 5.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
18.52 13.72 34.95 9.00 22.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m
2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 84 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
30 3.00 50
100 55 3.50 100
104 4.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.49 17.03 20.30 7.00 25.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60 σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 85 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
35 2.20 50
100 50 4.00 100
84 5.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.89 15.24 30.49 16.00 20.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
80
σ3=200kN/m2
60
40 σ2=100 kN/m2
20 σ1=50 kN/m2
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 86 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
39 3.00 50
100 53 3.00 100
95 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.92 16.32 22.00 14.00 22.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60 σ2=100 kN/m2
σ1=50 kN/m2
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 87 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
33 4.00 50
100 56 3.50 100
95 4.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.06 16.01 25.30 15.00 21.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 88 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
35 2.50 50
100 56 2.00 100
90 4.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.56 15.08 29.70 15.00 20.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60 σ2=100 kN/m2
σ1=50 kN/m2
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 89 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
33 2.50 50
100 49 3.00 100
112 5.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.02 13.97 36.00 12.00 23.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
σ3=200kN/m2
100
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 90 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
38 2.00 50
100 56 2.50 100
97 3.00 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
20.17 16.52 22.10 16.00 21.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100 σ3=200kN/m2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
σ1=50 kN/m2
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 91 od 113

200
□ Kriterijum loma
150
τ max δ σ
30 4.00 50
100 55 3.50 100
96 5.50 200
ɣ ɣd ω C' φ'
3
(kN/m ) (kN/m ) 3
(%) kN/m kN/m2
2
0
19.12 14.30 33.70 11.00 23.00
0 50 100 150 200
180
0
160
τ (kN/m2)
140
120
100
σ3=200kN/m2
80
60
σ2=100 kN/m2
40
σ1=50 kN/m2
20
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Strana 92 od 113
OPIT STIŠLJIVOSTI / SOIL COMPRESSIBILITY TEST
Metoda ispitivanja / Testing method : SRPS U.B1.032:1969 - ''povučen''

OBJEKAT / OBJECT : Autoput Kuzmin Sremska Raca granica sa Republikom Srpskom
Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-3/2.60-2.90 N19/14-294
0
Vertikalna deformacija / Effective stress ε (%)
9
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
efektivni vertikalni napon / vertical strain σ' (kPa)
REZULTATI ISPITIVANJA / RESULTS :

σ' Δε ε Mv
3 Δe e PODACI O UZORKU
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.573
0.789 6333 0.012 SAMPLE PARAMETERS
50 0.789 0.561 Visina uzorka /
0.955 5236 0.015 Speciment height 19.0 mm
100 1.744 0.546
1.178 8486 0.018 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 2.923 0.528
1.897 10543 0.029 ρd 1.700 g/cm3
400 4.820 0.499
3.204 12483 0.048
800 8.024 0.451
-0.171 233600 -0.002 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 7.853 0.453
-0.570 35100.0 -0.008
200 7.283 0.462
-0.567 17650.0 -0.008
100 6.717 0.470
-1.127 4437.5 -0.017
50 5.590 0.486
0.557 8975.0 0.008
100 6.147 0.478
0.8403 11900.002 0.0124213
200 6.98725339 0.466
0.56497188 35399.9922 0.00828087
400 7.55222527 0.45743263
800 1.07954578 37052.6211 0.01573365

Strana 93 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-3/7.30-7.60 N19/14-295
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.876
100 4.550 0.792
2.147 4659 0.038 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 6.697 0.753
3.585 5579 0.063 ρd 1.420 g/cm3
400 10.281 0.691
4.440 9010 0.075
800 14.721 0.616
-3.078 12996 -0.050 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 11.643 0.665
-0.563 35500.0 -0.009
200 11.080 0.675
-0.840 11900.0 -0.014
100 10.239 0.689
-0.278 18000.0 -0.005
50 9.962 0.693
0.222 22562.5 0.004
100 10.183 0.690
0.8884 11256.2441 0.01501055
200 11.0715537 0.675
0.56022356 35700.0352 0.00938158
400 11.6317772 0.66523194
800 0.78873299 50714.2461 0.01313423

Strana 94 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-5/4.00-4.30 N19/14-298
0
9
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.710
100 1.657 0.681
1.322 7565 0.022 ρs 2.66 g/cm3
200 2.979 0.659
2.009 9954 0.033 ρd 1.560 g/cm3
400 4.988 0.626
2.997 13347 0.049
800 7.985 0.577
-0.542 73800 -0.009 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 7.443 0.586
-0.539 37100.0 -0.009
200 6.904 0.594
-0.536 18650.0 -0.009
100 6.367 0.603
-0.533 9375.0 -0.009
50 5.834 0.611
0.212 23562.5 0.003
100 6.046 0.608
0.4785 20900.0195 0.00769279
200 6.52469765 0.600
0.74786317 26742.8594 0.01196658
400 7.27256082 0.58813614
800 0.91496273 43717.6289 0.01453085

Strana 95 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-5/8.60-8.90 N19/14-299
0
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 1.190
100 8.310 1.011
4.011 2493 0.081 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 12.322 0.930
4.358 4589 0.084 ρd 1.220 g/cm3
400 16.680 0.846
5.618 7120 0.104
800 22.298 0.742
-0.860 46523 -0.015 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 21.438 0.757
-0.656 30500.0 -0.012
200 20.782 0.769
-0.651 15350.0 -0.012
100 20.131 0.780
-0.647 7725.0 -0.012
50 19.484 0.792
0.643 7775.0 0.012
100 20.127 0.780
0.6473 15449.9775 0.01152392
200 20.7740173 0.769
0.65146518 30700.0293 0.0115239
400 21.4254825 0.75739586
800 1.1147546 35882.3359 0.01959065

Strana 96 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-7/3.00-3.30 N19/14-303
0
7
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.601
100 1.254 0.581
0.962 10395 0.015 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 2.216 0.566
1.738 11506 0.027 ρd 1.670 g/cm3
400 3.954 0.538
2.445 16357 0.038
800 6.400 0.501
-1.067 37500 -0.016 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 5.333 0.517
-0.528 37900.0 -0.008
200 4.805 0.525
-0.525 19050.0 -0.008
100 4.280 0.533
-0.522 9575.0 -0.008
50 3.758 0.541
0.208 24062.5 0.003
100 3.966 0.537
0.5206 19210.0078 0.00800359
200 4.48636876 0.529
0.8372578 23887.5059 0.01280575
400 5.32362657 0.51668167
800 1.26649081 31583.332 0.01920863

Strana 97 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-7/9.30-9.50 N19/14-304
0
10
15
20
25
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.785
100 7.375 0.656
3.774 2650 0.062 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 11.148 0.594
4.090 4890 0.065 ρd 1.500 g/cm3
400 15.238 0.528
5.082 7871 0.078
800 20.320 0.451
-6.769 5909 -0.098 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 13.550 0.453
5.187 -3855.6 0.080
200 18.738 0.469
-0.608 16450.0 -0.009
100 18.130 0.477
-0.604 8275.0 -0.009
50 17.526 0.486
0.240 20812.4 0.004
100 17.766 0.483
0.6020 16610.0156 0.00892737
200 18.3679125 0.474
0.60569294 33020.0313 0.00892737
400 18.9736054 0.4649834
800 1.21876933 32819.9922 0.01785477

Strana 98 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-9/3.40-3.60 N19/14-307
0
10
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.665
100 3.931 0.600
1.698 5890 0.027 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 5.628 0.573
2.284 8756 0.036 ρd 1.600 g/cm3
400 7.913 0.537
3.364 11892 0.052
800 11.276 0.485
-1.003 39882 -0.015 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 10.273 0.500
-0.584 34240.0 -0.009
200 9.689 0.509
-0.755 13246.2 -0.011
100 8.934 0.520
-0.576 8675.0 -0.009
50 8.358 0.529
0.229 21812.5 0.004
100 8.587 0.525
0.5169 19344.4629 0.00788489
200 9.10414664 0.517
0.57736734 34639.9922 0.00876099
400 9.68151399 0.50864291
800 1.39372828 28699.998 0.02102638

Strana 99 od 113

Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-9/6.40-6.60 N19/14-308
0
10
12
14
16
18
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.991
100 7.539 0.843
2.388 4188 0.044 ρs 2.66 g/cm3
200 9.927 0.799
2.621 7631 0.047 ρd 1.340 g/cm3
400 12.548 0.752
4.246 9420 0.074
800 16.794 0.678
-4.622 8654 -0.078 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 12.172 0.755
-0.896 22333.3 -0.016
200 11.277 0.771
-0.296 33800.0 -0.005
100 10.981 0.776
-0.767 6519.2 -0.014
50 10.214 0.790
0.410 12200.0 0.007
100 10.624 0.782
0.0588 170100.156 0.0010479
200 10.6824008 0.781
0.8823535 22666.6523 0.01571857
400 11.5647543 0.76571852
800 1.36498528 29304.3457 0.0241018

Strana 100 od 113


OBJEKAT / OBJECT : Autoput Kuzmin Sremska Raca granica sa Republikom Srpskom N16/04-02
Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-11/4.40-4.45 N19/14-312
0
10
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.600
100 2.809 0.555
1.733 5772 0.027 ρs 2.66 g/cm3
200 4.541 0.528
1.653 12100 0.025 ρd 1.660 g/cm3
400 6.194 0.503
2.521 15867 0.038
800 8.715 0.465
-1.437 27840 -0.021 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 7.278 0.486
-0.567 35300.0 -0.008
200 6.712 0.494
-0.563 17750.0 -0.008
100 6.148 0.503
-0.728 6865.4 -0.011
50 5.420 0.514
0.389 12842.8 0.006
100 5.809 0.508
0.8934 11193.752 0.01346963
200 6.7027709 0.494
0.28168987 71000.0703 0.00420926
400 6.98446077 0.49007812
800 1.07344665 37263.1484 0.01599519

Strana 101 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-12/3.00-3.30 N19/14-315
0
8
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.577
100 1.426 0.555
1.068 9365 0.017 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 2.493 0.538
1.889 10589 0.029 ρd 1.700 g/cm3
400 4.382 0.509
2.365 16912 0.036
800 6.747 0.474
-0.563 71000 -0.008 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 6.184 0.482
-0.560 35700.0 -0.008
200 5.624 0.490
-0.557 17950.0 -0.008
100 5.067 0.499
-0.554 9025.0 -0.008
50 4.513 0.507
0.275 18150.0 0.004
100 4.788 0.503
0.4972 20111.1035 0.00747189
200 5.28544986 0.495
0.05552466 360200.344 0.00083021
400 5.34097451 0.49437755
800 0.99999971 40000.0117 0.01494377

Strana 102 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-12/6.00-6.30 N19/14-316
0
10
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.600
100 2.809 0.555
1.733 5772 0.027 ρs 2.66 g/cm3
200 4.541 0.528
1.653 12100 0.025 ρd 1.660 g/cm3
400 6.194 0.503
2.521 15867 0.038
800 8.715 0.465
-1.437 27840 -0.021 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 7.278 0.486
-0.567 35300.0 -0.008
200 6.712 0.494
-0.563 17750.0 -0.008
100 6.148 0.503
-0.728 6865.4 -0.011
50 5.420 0.514
0.389 12842.8 0.006
100 5.809 0.508
0.8934 11193.752 0.01346963
200 6.7027709 0.494
0.28168987 71000.0703 0.00420926
400 6.98446077 0.49007812
800 1.07344665 37263.1484 0.01599519

Strana 103 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-15/1.30-1.60 N19/14-319
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.568
100 4.347 0.500
2.560 3906 0.038 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 6.907 0.462
2.681 7460 0.039 ρd 1.700 g/cm3
400 9.588 0.423
4.187 9553 0.060
800 13.776 0.363
-2.645 15122 -0.036 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 11.130 0.399
-0.560 35699.9 -0.008
200 10.570 0.407
-0.557 17950.0 -0.008
100 10.013 0.415
-0.554 9025.0 -0.008
50 9.459 0.423
0.220 22687.5 0.003
100 9.679 0.420
0.5522 18109.9961 0.00783911
200 10.231588 0.412
1.99888892 10005.5586 0.02822078
400 12.2304769 0.38360253
800 -0.50991453 -78444.5234 -0.00705519

Strana 104 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-15/6.00-6.30 N19/14-320
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.759
100 3.939 0.690
2.237 4470 0.038 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 6.176 0.652
3.779 5293 0.062 ρd 1.520 g/cm3
400 9.954 0.590
4.757 8409 0.076
800 14.711 0.514
-4.239 9436 -0.064 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 10.472 0.578
-0.557 35900.0 -0.009
200 9.915 0.587
-0.720 13884.6 -0.011
100 9.195 0.599
-0.550 9090.0 -0.009
50 8.644 0.607
0.438 11425.0 0.007
100 9.082 0.600
0.5495 18199.9961 0.00879265
200 9.63155733 0.591
0.55248632 36199.9922 0.00879265
400 10.1840436 0.58267719
800 1.22222238 32727.2676 0.01934383

Strana 105 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17/2.20-2.40 N19/14-323
0
10
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.642
100 3.128 0.591
1.793 5579 0.029 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 4.921 0.563
2.434 8218 0.038 ρd 1.630 g/cm3
400 7.354 0.525
3.912 10226 0.060
800 11.266 0.465
-0.590 67800 -0.009 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 10.676 0.474
-0.587 34100.0 -0.009
200 10.089 0.482
-0.583 17150.0 -0.009
100 9.506 0.491
-0.754 6634.6 -0.011
50 8.753 0.502
0.403 12414.3 0.006
100 9.156 0.496
0.3466 28850.0273 0.00518575
200 9.5021444 0.491
0.81159412 24642.8594 0.0121001
400 10.3137385 0.47880551
800 1.16890665 34220.0117 0.01728586

Strana 106 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17/4.20-4.40 N19/14-324
0
10
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.668
100 4.936 0.586
1.367 7315 0.022 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 6.303 0.564
1.759 11370 0.028 ρd 1.600 g/cm3
400 8.062 0.537
2.767 14455 0.043
800 10.829 0.494
-1.116 35840 -0.017 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 9.713 0.511
-0.552 36240.0 -0.008
200 9.161 0.519
-0.549 18220.0 -0.008
100 8.612 0.528
-0.546 9160.0 -0.008
50 8.067 0.536
0.543 9210.0 0.008
100 8.609 0.528
0.5459 18319.9961 0.00833854
200 9.15524217 0.519
0.54884755 36439.9922 0.00833854
400 9.70408972 0.51094317
800 0.77262685 51771.4336 0.01167395

Strana 107 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17/7.80-8.00 N19/14-325
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.777
100 4.746 0.694
2.046 4887 0.035 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 6.792 0.659
2.625 7620 0.044 ρd 1.510 g/cm3
400 9.416 0.615
4.015 9962 0.065
800 13.432 0.551
-1.719 23267 -0.027 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 11.713 0.577
-0.563 35500.0 -0.009
200 11.149 0.586
-0.560 17850.0 -0.009
100 10.589 0.595
-0.557 8975.0 -0.009
50 10.032 0.604
0.222 22562.5 0.004
100 10.254 0.600
0.5552 18010.0176 0.00888593
200 10.8088067 0.591
0.55834809 35819.9492 0.00888595
400 11.3671548 0.58258617
800 1.1229649 35619.9922 0.01777189

Strana 108 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-17/17.30-17.60 N19/14-328
0
10
12
14
16
18
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.911
100 6.477 0.789
2.190 4566 0.039 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 8.667 0.750
2.949 6781 0.052 ρd 1.400 g/cm3
400 11.617 0.698
4.052 9872 0.069
800 15.668 0.629
-1.173 34100 -0.019 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 14.495 0.648
-0.580 34500.0 -0.010
200 13.916 0.658
-0.576 17350.0 -0.010
100 13.339 0.668
-0.745 6711.5 -0.012
50 12.594 0.680
0.455 10987.5 0.008
100 13.049 0.672
0.2857 35000.0352 0.00477809
200 13.3351301 0.668
0.97421247 20529.4023 0.01624553
400 14.3093426 0.65130997
800 1.50462958 26584.6172 0.0248461

Strana 109 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-19/3.30-3.60 N19/14-330
0
10
12
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.622
100 1.859 0.592
1.325 7550 0.021 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 3.183 0.571
2.633 7596 0.041 ρd 1.650 g/cm3
400 5.816 0.530
4.454 8981 0.068
800 10.270 0.462
-0.555 72080 -0.008 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 9.715 0.470
-0.717 27876.9 -0.011
200 8.998 0.480
-0.548 18250.0 -0.008
100 8.450 0.488
-0.545 9175.0 -0.008
50 7.905 0.497
0.542 9225.0 0.008
100 8.447 0.488
0.5450 18349.9961 0.00811138
200 8.99162543 0.480
0.54794534 36499.9922 0.00811138
400 9.53957076 0.47221547
800 0.93663888 42705.8945 0.01378934

Strana 110 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-22/1.10-1.40 N19/14-347
0
7
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.769
100 1.214 0.747
1.066 9385 0.019 ρs 2.66 g/cm3
200 2.280 0.729
1.562 12807 0.027 ρd 1.500 g/cm3
400 3.841 0.702
2.626 15233 0.045
800 6.467 0.657
-1.573 25429 -0.026 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 4.894 0.683
-0.553 36160.0 -0.009
200 4.341 0.692
-0.550 18180.0 -0.009
100 3.791 0.702
-0.547 9140.0 -0.009
50 3.244 0.711
0.490 10211.1 0.008
100 3.734 0.703
0.5467 18289.9961 0.00930851
200 4.28039285 0.693
0.54975274 36379.9922 0.00930851
400 4.8301456 0.6839096
800 0.77390783 51685.7422 0.01303191

Strana 111 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-24/3.50-3.80 N19/14-353
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.798
100 4.200 0.723
2.526 3959 0.044 ρs 2.67 g/cm3
200 6.726 0.680
3.211 6228 0.054 ρd 1.490 g/cm3
400 9.938 0.626
4.249 9414 0.069
800 14.187 0.557
-3.283 12185 -0.051 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 10.904 0.608
-0.589 33980.0 -0.009
200 10.315 0.617
-0.585 17090.0 -0.009
100 9.730 0.627
-0.582 8595.0 -0.009
50 9.149 0.636
0.578 8645.0 0.009
100 9.727 0.627
0.5817 17189.9961 0.00946305
200 10.308636 0.617
0.58513765 34179.9922 0.00946305
400 10.8937736 0.60777247
800 0.82401474 48542.8203 0.01324828

Strana 112 od 113


Lab. br./ ID
UZORAK/SAMPLE : C-24/4.70-4.90 N19/14-354
0
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

σ' Δε ε Mv
(kN/m ) (%) (%) (kPa)
0 0.874
100 5.532 0.772
2.171 4605 0.038 ρs 2.68 g/cm3
200 7.704 0.733
2.789 7171 0.048 ρd 1.430 g/cm3
400 10.493 0.685
3.103 12891 0.052
800 13.596 0.632
-1.208 33100 -0.020 NAPOMENA / NOTE
400 12.387 0.652
-0.597 33500.0 -0.010
200 11.790 0.662
-0.415 24071.4 -0.007
100 11.375 0.669
-0.768 6507.7 -0.013
50 10.606 0.682
0.411 12178.6 0.007
100 11.017 0.675
0.7656 13061.5273 0.01282298
200 11.7825862 0.662
0.41542987 48142.9023 0.00690467
400 12.1980161 0.65514898
800 1.0131113 39482.3359 0.0167685

Strana 113 od 113

1.7 NUMERICAL DOCUMENTS

Calculation of Allowable Load-Bearing
Capacity of Piles
PRORAČUN DOZVOLJENE NOSIVOSTI POJEDINAČNOG ŠIPA
PREMA PRAVILNIKU O TEHNIČKIM NORMATIVIMA ZA TEMELJENJE GRAĐEVINSKIH OBJEKATA
Prilog br.1.7.1
Autoput Kuzmin - Sremska Rača, granica sa Republikom Srpskom, Most preko
Projekat:
reke Save
Objekat: Stubno mesto S-7
GEOTEHNIČKI MODEL
Debljina sloja Zapr. težina Kohezija Ugao trenja Oznaka
Sloj
d (m) Υ (kN/m3) c (kPa) φ(°) sloja
Nagl. greda 1 3.3 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
2 2.7 10.0 9.0 20.0 appr,p,m
Omotač šipa 3 1.6 10.0 0.0 30.0 app,pr
4 4.3 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p
Baza šipa 7 5.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p
Parcijalni faktori sigurnosti: Redukovani parametri čvrstoće:

Fc = 2.5 tan  c
tan  a  ca 
Fφ = 1.5 F Fc
PODACI O ŠIPU
Dužina šipa ( L ): 15.0 m Prečnik baze šipa ( R ): 1.20 m

Prečnik šipa ( r ): 1.20 m Dubina naglavice: 3.30 m
NOSIVOST OMOTAČA ŠIPA
qos q sloja Ko σn cai φai qsi Asi Qsi

Sloj
(kPa) (kPa) (-) (kPa) (kPa) (°) (kPa) (m2) (kN)
1 - apg,pr 33.00 33.00
2 - appr,p,m 46.50 27.00 0.66 30.60 3.60 13.64 11.02 10.18 112.21
3 - app,pr 68.00 16.00 0.50 34.00 0.00 21.05 13.09 6.03 78.94
4 - akš,p 97.50 43.00 0.36 34.83 0.00 29.22 19.48 16.21 315.83
UKUPNO: 90.1 1103.9
NOSIVOST BAZE ŠIPA
ca ( kPa ) φa ( ° ) Ko A b ( m2 ) qo ( kPa ) Nc* Nq* N Υ* qb (kPa) Qb (kN)

0.00 29.22 0.36 1.13 183.00 313.14 61.00 15.29 4079.6 4613.9
DOZVOLJENA NOSIVOST POJEDINAČNOG ŠIPA
ŠIP NOSIVOST Qa  Qb  Qs
Dužina Prečnik Baza Omotač Ukupno Qb  qb  Ab
L (m) R (m) Qb (kN) Qs (kN) ΣQa (kN) Q s  q si  A si
15.0 1.2 4614 1104 5718 qb  ca  N c *  q0  K 0  N q *  0,5    R  N  *
q s  ca i   ni  tan  ai
Autoput Kuzmin - Sremska Rača, granica sa Republikom Srpskom, most preko reke Save
Analysis of CPT pile

Input data
Project
Task : Autoput Kuzmin - Sremska Rača, granica sa Republikom Srpskom, most preko reke Save
Date : 27.12.2018.
Project ID : STUBNO MESTO S 7
Project number : 1.7.2.
Settings
(input for current task)
Pile CPT
Verification methodology : EN 1997-2
Analysis type : LCPC (Bustamante)
Partial factors for resistances (R)
Partial factor on base resistance : b = 3,00 [–]
Partial factor on shaft resistance : s = 2,50 [–]
Reduction coefficients
Reduction coeff. of load settlement curve : k= 1,00 [–]
Soil parameters
ap g,pr
Unit weight :  = 19,50 kN/m3
Angle of internal friction : ef = 20,00 °
Saturated unit weight : sat = 20,00 kN/m3
Type of soil : silt

ap p,pr
Type of soil : sand, gravel
Magnitude OCR : OCR  2
Type of grains : sand finer than 600 nm

ak š,p
Type of grains : gravel coarser than 2 mm

ak p
Type of grains : sand coarser than 600 nm

ap pr,p,m
1
[GeoStructural Analysis - Pile CPT | version 5.19.5.0 | Copyright © 2015 Fine spol. s r.o. All Rights Reserved | www.finesoftware.eu]

Type of soil : silt

Construction
Type of construction : single pile

Design load = 0,00 kN
Service load = 0,00 kN
Geometry
Type of pile : bored pile with steel casing
Pile material : concrete

Elevation from the original ground = 0,00 m
Elevation from the finished grade = -3,30 m
Pile length in soil = 15,00 m
Pile head offset above terrain = 0,50 m
Depth of finished grade = 3,30 m
Pile cross-section - circular
Pile diameter d = 1,20 m
GWT
Ground water table GWT = 0,20 m

Tests
Origin Modif.
No. Name of test:
h [m] param.
1 CPT-S 14 0,15 YES
Modified parameters of CPTs
GWT NSF PSF Thicknesses
No. Name of test:
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 CPT-S 14 0,20 0,20 0,20 5,00, 4,40, 1,60,
4,30, 2,70, 7,00, --

2
Name : CPT Stage - analysis : 1 - 0

1,20
3,30
5,00
0,50 0,20
GWT
4,40
1,60
15,00
4,30
2,70
7,00
0 75,00
[MPa]
Global settings
The analysis does not consider the influence of negative skin friction.
Partial factor on model uncertainty cal = 1,00

Bearing capacity calculation - LCPC (Bustamante)
Calculation of vertical pile bearing capacity - intermediate results
Pile diameter deq = 1,20 m
Pile diameter at base ds,eq = 1,20 m
Pile area at base Ab = 1,13 m2
Coeff. of reduc. of pile base bear. capacity p = 0,30
Coeff. of influence of pile shape s = 1,00
Coeff. of influence of pile widened base  = 1,00
Calculation of vertical bearing capacity - results
Minimum resistance of pile in compression Rc,min = 20545,70 kN
Coefficient 4 = 1,40
Mean resistance of pile in compression Rc,mean = 20545,70 kN
Characteristic pile bearing capacity Rc = 14675,50 kN

Design pile bearing capacity Rcd = 5082,19 kN
Design load Fs,d = 0,00 kN
Rcd = 5082,19 kN > Fs,d = 0,00 kN
Verification of pile for bearing capacity is SATISFACTORY

3
Prilog br.1.7.3
Projekat:
reke Save
GEOTEHNIČKI MODEL
Sloj
Nagl. greda 1 4.7 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
2 2.7 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
Omotač šipa
3 6.0 10.0 2.0 30.0 app,pr
Baza šipa 7 5.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p

Fc = 2.5 tan  c
Fφ = 1.5 F Fc
PODACI O ŠIPU


Sloj
1 - apg,pr 46.70 46.70
2 - apg,pr 60.20 27.00 0.66 39.61 6.00 13.64 15.61 12.72 198.63
3 - app,pr 103.70 60.00 0.50 51.85 0.80 21.05 20.76 28.27 586.89
UKUPNO: 157.0 2361.3
NOSIVOST BAZE ŠIPA

0.00 29.22 0.36 1.77 226.70 313.14 61.00 15.29 5054.8 8932.5
18.0 1.5 8933 2361 11294 qb  ca  N c *  q0  K 0  N q *  0,5    R  N  *

Input data
Project
Date : 27.12.2018.
Project ID : STUBNO MESTO S15
Settings
Pile CPT
Soil parameters
ap g,pr
Type of soil : silt

ap p,pr

ak š,p

ak p

Construction

1

Geometry

GWT

Tests
Origin Modif.
No. Name of test:
h [m] param.
1 CPT-19 1,80 YES
No. Name of test:
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 CPT-19 0,00 0,00 0,00 7,40, 6,00, 7,20,
1,40, 18,00, --

1,50
4,67
0,50 7,40
GWT
6,00
18,00
7,20
1,40
18,00
0 75,00
[MPa]
Global settings
2
Reduce coeff. 3, 4 (rigid structure)


Rcd = 8589,08 kN > Fs,d = 0,00 kN

3
Prilog br.1.7.4
Projekat:
reke Save
GEOTEHNIČKI MODEL
Sloj
Nagl. greda 1 5.3 10.0 0.0 38.0 akš,p
2 13.7 10.0 0.0 38.0 akš,p
Omotač šipa
3 8.3 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p
Baza šipa 4 3.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p

Fc = 2.5 tan  c
Fφ = 1.5 F Fc
PODACI O ŠIPU


Sloj
1 - akš,p 53.30 53.30
2 - akš,p 121.65 136.70 0.38 46.75 0.00 27.51 24.35 64.42 1568.75
3 - akš,p 231.50 83.00 0.36 82.69 0.00 29.22 46.26 39.11 1809.34
UKUPNO: 70.6 3378.1
NOSIVOST BAZE ŠIPA

0.00 29.22 0.36 1.77 273.00 313.14 61.00 15.29 6063.7 10715.5
22.0 1.5 10716 3378 14094 qb  ca  N c *  q0  K 0  N q *  0,5    R  N  *

Input data
Project
Date : 27.12.2018.
Settings
Pile CPT
Soil parameters
ap š,p
Type of grains : gravel finer than 2 mm

ap š,p-1
Type of grains : gravel finer than 2 mm

Construction

Geometry

1
GWT

Tests
Origin Modif.
No. Name of test:
h [m] param.
1 Test No. 1 0,00 YES
No. Name of test:
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 Test No. 1 0,00 0,00 0,00 19,00, 11,00, --

1,50
5,33
0,50
GWT
19,00
22,00
11,00
0 50,00
[MPa]
Global settings

2


Rcd = 12599,82 kN > Fs,d = 0,00 kN

3
Prilog br.1.7.7
Projekat:
reke Save
GEOTEHNIČKI MODEL
Sloj
Nagl. greda 1 4.5 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
2 3.7 10.0 9.0 20.0 appr,p,m
Omotač šipa 3 1.7 10.0 0.0 34.0 akp
4 12.6 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p
Baza šipa 5 5.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p

Fc = 2.5 tan  c
Fφ = 1.5 F Fc
PODACI O ŠIPU


Sloj
1 - apg,pr 45.20 45.20
2 - appr,p,m 63.70 37.00 0.66 41.91 3.60 13.64 13.77 17.44 240.09
3 - akp 90.70 17.00 0.44 39.98 0.00 24.21 17.98 8.01 144.03
4 - akš,p 162.20 126.00 0.36 57.94 0.00 29.22 32.41 59.38 1924.47
UKUPNO: 64.2 2308.6
NOSIVOST BAZE ŠIPA

0.00 29.22 0.36 1.77 225.20 313.14 61.00 15.29 5022.1 8874.8
18.0 1.5 8875 2309 11183 qb  ca  N c *  q0  K 0  N q *  0,5    R  N  *

Input data
Project
Date : 27.12.2018.
Settings
Pile CPT
Soil parameters
ap g,pr
Type of soil : silt

ap p,pr

ak š,p

ak p

ap pr,p,m
1

Type of soil : silt

Construction

Geometry

GWT

Tests
Origin Modif.
No. Name of test:
h [m] param.
1 CPT-S 22 0,50 YES
No. Name of test:
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 CPT-S 22 0,20 0,20 0,20 4,50, 3,70, 1,70,
20,10, --

2

1,50
4,50 4,52
0,50 0,20
GWT
3,70
1,70
18,00
20,10
0 75,00
[MPa]
Global settings


Rcd = 10529,73 kN > Fs,d = 0,00 kN

3
Prilog br.1.7.9
Projekat:
reke Save
GEOTEHNIČKI MODEL
Sloj
Nagl. greda 1 3.4 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
2 0.8 10.0 15.0 20.0 apg,pr
Omotač šipa 3 1.2 10.0 9.0 20.0 appr,p,m
4 3.3 10.0 0.0 30.0 akp
Baza šipa 6 5.0 10.0 0.0 40.0 akš,p

Fc = 2.5 tan  c
Fφ = 1.5 F Fc
PODACI O ŠIPU


Sloj
1 - apg,pr 33.80 33.80
2 - apg,pr 37.90 8.20 0.66 24.94 6.00 13.64 12.05 3.09 37.25
3 - appr,p,m 48.00 12.00 0.66 31.58 3.60 13.64 11.26 4.52 50.95
4 - akp 70.50 33.00 0.50 35.25 0.00 21.05 13.57 12.44 168.79
UKUPNO: 64.0 1247.1
NOSIVOST BAZE ŠIPA

0.00 29.22 0.36 1.13 184.00 313.14 61.00 15.29 4101.4 4638.5
15.0 1.2 4639 1247 5886 qb  ca  N c *  q0  K 0  N q *  0,5    R  N  *

Input data
Project
Date : 27.12.2018.
Project ID : STUBNO MESTO S 18
Settings
Pile CPT
Soil parameters
ap g,pr
Type of soil : silt

ap p,pr

ak š,p

ak p

ap pr,p,m
1

Type of soil : silt

Construction

Geometry

GWT

Tests
Origin Modif.
No. Name of test:
h [m] param.
1 CPT-S 24 0,00 YES
No. Name of test:
[m] [m] [m] [m]
1 CPT-S 24 1,50 1,50 1,50 4,20, 1,20, 3,30,
16,30, --

2

1,20
4,20 3,38
0,50
1,50
1,20
GWT
3,30
15,00
16,30
0 75,00
[MPa]
Global settings


Rcd = 6423,77 kN > Fs,d = 0,00 kN

3
1.8 REPORT ON GEOPHYSICAL

INVESTIGATIONS
GEOFIZIČKI INŽENJERING
BELGRADE
REPORT
ON GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE GROUND FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE ON THE SAVA RIVER ON
HIGHWAY SECTION KUZMIN – BORDER WITH THE REPUBLIC
OF SRPSKA
PREPARED BY:
__________________________
Vojislav Samolov, Graduate Geophys.Eng.
Authorisation No. 152-981/80-08/1
29.02.1980
Licence No.: 493 15 95 14
19.06.2014
BELGRADE
2 0 1 9
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY OF GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS 4
3. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS OF GEOPHYSICAL

INVESTIGATIONS 5
4. CONCLUSIONS 10
2
LIST OF ANNEXES
Scale
1. Topographic map 1:200,000

2. Basic Geological Map 1:100,000
3. Layout - Ortho 1:100,000
4. Layout – Ortho – Sections 5 and 6 1:2,500
5. Seismic Profile 5 – Vp waves 1:1,000
6. Seismic Profile 5 – Vs waves 1:1,000
7. Seismic Profile 6 – Vp waves 1:1,000
8. Seismic Profile 6 – Vs waves 1:1,000
3
1. INTRODUCTION
Geophysical-seismic investigations were carried out in order to collect

engineering-geological data about the terrain where highway Kuzmin – border with the
Republic of Srpska, in the Sava River bridge section, is to be constructed. The purpose
of these geophysical investigations was to determine, together with geomechanical
exploratory drilling and laboratory tests of excavated and drilled material, spatial
distribution and bedding depth of individual lithological members.
The objective of the geophysical investigations was to determine the following:
- Depth and velocity of elastic longitudinal Vp

and transversal waves Vs
- Thickness of surface complex
- Spatial distribution and bedding depth of individual lithological members
The seismic investigations along the profiles involved refraction seismic

investigations, where velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs waves
were determined for the mapped lithological media.
The geophysical team of Geofizički Inženjering, Belgrade, conducted the

geophysical investigations in March 2019 and the results of seismic investigations were
interpreted and the textual part of the report was prepared by Vojislav Samolov,
Graduate Geophys.Eng. and his associates.
4
2. METHODOLOGY OF GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS
The geophysical – seismic investigations were conducted in the subject

investigation area for the purpose of determining engineering-geological conditions for
construction of highway Kuzmin – border with the Republic of Srpska, in the Sava
Bridge section.
Seismic Investigations
Seismic methods are frequently used because seismic waves have the
characteristics that enable them to penetrate geological materials. The seismic methods
used for geotechnical investigations, waves are excited or created at the ground surface
by using various mechanical devices or a heavy hammer. In that way, however, the
investigation depths do not exceed around 30 meters.
Seismic wave propagation is registered and monitored by sensitive sensors, which are
called geophones. A geophone is very similar to a microphone, which is used for sound
recording, but it is adjusted to recording of very weak mechanical oscillations. A
geophone has a robust housing and metal point, which is driven into the ground. It is
connected to a device – seismograph, which amplifies and records the oscillations
(Figure 1). Designations tp and ts, in oscillation record refer to the times of arrival of
longitudinal and transversal waves in relation to the beginning of measurement 0 (ms).
The designation (ms) means millisecond.
Figure 1. Seismic Wave with Longitudinal and Transversal Oscillations
When applying seismic methods in geotechnical engineering, after the hammer hits the
ground, it creates seismic waves that propagate in all directions.
5
Figure 2. Excitation of Seismic Waves
Direct waves travel on the ground surface and two wave processes occur underground:
refraction and reflection. Refraction and reflection of seismic waves occur at the contact
between different geological media that the waves travel through (Figure 2).
In seismic methods, one of the most important parameters is wave velocity, which
mostly depends on physical parameters: elasticity and density of material. The harder
the geological or other material medium, the larger velocities, and vice versa.
Some velocities of longitudinal seismic waves in km/s (kilometres per second) are
given in the table below.
Geological Formation - Material Velocity in km/s

Loose surface material 0.2 - 0.6
Gravel, debris, dry sand 0.12 - 0.98
Wet gravel and sand 1.50 - 1.6
Loess 0.38 - 0.4
Fresh water 1.43 - 1.68
Sea water 1.43 - 1.53
Sandstone 2.6 - 5.3
Marlstone 2.0 - 3.5
Compact limestone 5.2 - 7.0
Damaged limestone 1.6 - 3.0
Dolomite 5.9 - 6.4
Schist 2.1 - 4.2
Table: Geological Formations – Materials and Seismic Wave Velocities
The physical basis of wave refraction and reflection is defined by Snell’s law, which is
well-known in optics. In refraction, waves are refracted only if they travel through the
contact between different elastic media and if the incoming angle is less than 90º. Apart
from that, refraction requires wave velocity in the lower medium to be higher than the
velocity in the upper medium (V2 >V1).
The principle of velocity calculation for each medium is simple because it is easy to
calculate the velocity for the known distance and known time. Wave arrival times are
entered on Y axis for each geophone and its distance. This gives a specific diagram,
which consists of an arch series of short rectilinear segments. The diagrams formed in
this way are called time distance curves. Each rectilinear segment of the time distance
curve corresponds to one medium and has its own velocity (Figure 3).
6
Figure 3. Time Distance Curves with Rectilinear Segments
After obtaining wave travel times from the first to the last, the velocity of elastic waves
is calculated for each segment of the time distance curve and practically the number of
layers or media below the ground surface is determined.
Refraction seismic investigations in the field are quite schematic and simple. A
rectilinear profile with 12, 24 or the required number of geophones is set in a part of the
terrain. The geophones are arranged at identical intervals and they are connected to a
multi-channel seismograph. Shot points are located at the ends of the linear geophone
array, in order to cover the space below the ground surface maximally with seismic
waves. By measuring arrival times at each geophone, time distance curves are formed
with segments that are designated as V1, V2 and V3 for the ground with three media.
The segment with velocity V1 corresponds to the surface layer, segment V2 corresponds
to the middle layer and the velocity of the third segment V3 corresponds to the bedrock,
which all together gives the seismic ground model.
Figure 4. Seismic Ground Model
After determining velocities of seismic waves for all three media, their depth can be
calculated as well. As these are complex mathematical operations, the manner of depth
calculation is not described herein.
Investigations at the site were performed by using GEODE seismograph produced by

Geometrix, USA. This instrument is intended and is very useful for geotechnical field
investigations. The measuring system consists of two units connected by classical
computer interface. The first unit is a system of geophone amplifiers with analogue-
digital 24-bit conversion, in a field robust case (yellow container), and the second unit
is a field computer (laptop). The computer is used for control of measuring process,
selection of the number of routes, amplifications per channel, activation of time base by
an outer trigger and for recording of obtained oscillations. The computer also allows
overview of obtained data so that the operator may directly review each recorded datum
7
and assess its quality. The measuring system is portable and lightweight and therefore it
is quite efficient in the field (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Seismic Measuring System
In the process of measuring, oscillation sensors, geophones were connected to the

measuring system by means of a multi-core cable. Two types of geophones were used:
for longitudinal waves – the so-called “vertical” geophones and for transversal wavers –
the so-called “horizontal” geophones, which were connected alternatively in the
measuring process (Figure 6).
Figure 6. “Vertical” and “Horizontal” Geophones.
Measurements were made in 60 m long profiles. During these measurements,

geophones for vertical recording – for longitudinal waves, and geophones for recording
horizontal oscillations, for transversal waves, were installed at 12 measuring points.
Excitation involved blows of a heavy hammer on the ground by means of a special
transmitter made of very hard plastic, which is convenient for blows in vertical and
horizontal direction (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Excitation of Longitudinal and Transversal Waves by Using Hammer
8
First arrivals of oscillations required for determination of times i.e. velocities of elastic
waves are automatic and they were determined graphically with manual correction by
using a special program. Data about first arrivals and geometry of the measured profiles
were then entered in SeisImager software for their interpretation through the inversion
process for the purpose of developing 2D seismic models, which in other works is the
process of seismic tomography.
Geophysical investigations along profiles involved refraction seismic

investigations for determining velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs
waves in the mapped lithological media. Two (2) refraction seismic profiles were
measured. Profiles 5 and 6 were measured on the left and right side of the bridge on the
Sava River. The profile lengths amounted to 144 meters with geophones arranged at
the intervals of 12 meters. The positions of seismic profiles are presented in the relevant
layout (Annexes 3 and 4).
Results of seismic investigations were interpreted by using time distance curves

of elastic longitudinal and transversal seismic wave velocities. The time distance curves
of wave velocities represent dependence of the first arrivals of elastic longitudinal
waves from the excitation point to the receiver – geophone. Results of seismic
investigations are presented in the form of time distance curves of wave velocities and
with interpreted geological section (Annexes 5, 6, 7 and 8).
Seismic measurements were performed by using 12-channel seismic device

GEODE - Geometrix (USA) and geophones SМ-4 of 10 Hz.
Data were processed by using SeisImager computer program.
9
3. INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS OF GEOPHYSICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
Geophysical-seismic investigations were conducted for the purpose of collecting

engineering-geological data about the ground for construction of highway Kuzmin –
border with the Republic of Srpska in the Sava bridge section. The purpose of these
geophysical investigations, together with geomechanical exploratory drilling and
laboratory tests of excavated and drilled material, was to determine spatial distribution
and bedding depth of individual lithological members.
Seismic Investigations
The geophysical investigations along the defined profiles involved refraction

seismic investigations, where velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs
waves were determined for the mapped lithological media.
Results of seismic investigations were interpreted based on time distance

curves of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs seismic wave velocities. The time
distance curves show dependence of the first arrivals of elastic longitudinal waves from
the shot point to the receiver – geophone. Results of seismic investigations of elastic
longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs waves are presented in the form of time distance
curves of velocities with interpreted geological section (Annexes 5, 6, 7 and 8).
All these parameters determined by refraction-seismic investigations, being:

name of lithological medium, velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs
waves and unit weight γ were used in developing a geodynamic ground model to the
investigation depth of 30 m. The values of these parameters are given in the tables
below.
Bridge on the Sava River – Profile PR-5
Table 1 below shows the geodynamic profile of the ground down to the depth of
30 m.
Table 1
Velocity of Elastic Seismic Unit Weight
Lithological Medium Waves
km/s KN/m³
Vp Vs
Medium 1 0.40 0.20 18.5-19.0
Medium 2 1.10 0.35 19.0-19.5
Medium 3 1.60 0.45 19.5-20.0
Bridge on the Sava River – Profile-6
Table 2 below shows the geodynamic profile of the ground down to the
depth of 30 m.
Table 2
Velocity of Elastic Seismic Unit Weight
Lithological Medium Waves
km/s KN/m³
10
Vp Vs
Medium 1 0.30 0.15 18.5-19.0
Medium 2 1.20 0.40 19.0-19.5
Medium 3 1.70 0.60 19.5-20.0
The dynamic parameters of elasticity were calculated based on velocities of
body waves by applying the formulas given below and the obtained results are
presented in the table.
Poisson’s modulus of elasticity ( was calculated by applying the following formula:
Where: VP – velocity of longitudinal elastic waves;

VS – velocity of transversal elastic waves.
Shearing modulus “G” was calculated by applying the following formula:
Where: - ground density, VS – velocity of elastic transversal waves.
Young’s modulus “E” was calculated by applying the following formula:
Where; - ground density.
Results of calculations made by using the above formulas and data are presented in the
form of tables.
At the Sava bridge site, refraction seismic profile PR-5 (Annex 4), positioned in
parallel with the riverbank, was measured. Elastic response of the geological medium
along the profile route (Table 1) indicated a three-layer medium.
Refraction Seismic Profile PR-5 Table 3

Medium Longitudinal VP Wave Transversal VS Wave Poisson’s
Velocity Velocity Modulus
(m/s) (m/s)
Medium 1 400 200 0.33
Medium 2 1100 350 0.44
Medium 3 1600 450 0.46
Values of dynamic elasticity parameters: Poisson’s modulus, Young’s modulus and

shearing modulus which were calculated for the above values of unit weighs and body
11
wave velocities measured at refraction seismic profile PR-5 are presented in Table 4
below.
Table 4
Identified Calculated Values of Elastic Parameters of Lithological Members
Media VP VS ρ 103 Edin G
3
(m/s) (m/s) (Kg/m ) (Mpa) (MPa)
Medium 1 400 200 0.33 1.85-1.90 198-203 74-76
Medium 2 1100 350 0.44 1.90-1.95 709-728 233-239
Medium 3 1600 450 0.46 1.95-2.00 1080 -1090 395 - 405
along the route of profile PR-6 (Table 2) indicated a three-layer medium.

Medium Longitudinal VP Wave Transversal VS Wave Poisson’s
(m/s) (m/s)
Medium 1 300 150 0.33
Medium 2 1200 400 0.44
Medium 3 1700 600 0.43

wave velocities measured at refraction seismic profile PR-6 are presented in Table 6
below.
Table 6
(m/s) (m/s) (Kg/m3) (Mpa) (MPa)
Medium 1 300 150 0.33 1.85-1.90 111-114 42-43
Medium 2 1200 400 0.44 1.90-1.95 849-866 304-312
Medium 3 1700 600 0.43 1.95-2.00 1979 - 2030 702 - 720
The approximate value of deformation modulus was assessed by using the following
correlation dependence:
LogVS = 0.6logEdrf + 1.55
Where: VS – given in m/s and deformation modulus Edef in MPa.
The above formula cannot be applied to rocky and semi-rocky grounds and for that
reason it was not used for the assessment of deformation moduluses for marls and
limestones. Results obtained by using the above formula are presented in the tables
below per medium and per refraction seismic profile.
12
Refraction Seismic Profile SP-5 Table 7
Medium VS (m/s) Edef (Mpa)
Medium 1 200 18
Medium 2 400 45
Medium 3 500 69
Medium 1 200 11
Medium 2 350 57
Medium 3 500 111
Based on the assessed value of deformation modulus Edef, Medium 1 can be classified as
moderately deformable, Medium 2 as transitional, from moderately deformable to
slightly deformable, and Medium 3 can be classified as slightly deformable.
NOTE:
The above deformation moduluses Edef should be considered as data that indicate spatial
deformability of identified media and parameters determined in the laboratory and by
penetration tests are referent for the calculations of structure foundation.
13
4. CONCLUSIONS
Geophysical-seismic investigations were carried in the investigation area for

construction of highway Kuzmin – border with the Republic of Srpska, in the section
of the bridge over the Sava River.
The purpose of the geophysical investigations was to determine:
- Depths and velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs waves;

- Thickness of the surface complex;
- Spatial distribution of bedding depth of individual lithological members
Results of seismic investigations were interpreted by using time distance curves

of elastic longitudinal and transversal seismic wave velocities. The time distance curves
of wave velocities represent dependence of the first arrivals of elastic longitudinal
waves from the excitation point to the receiver – geophone. Results of seismic
investigations are presented in the form of time distance curves of wave velocities and
with interpreted geological section (Annexes 5, 6, 7 and 8).
All these parameters determined by refraction-seismic investigations, being:

name of lithological medium, velocities of elastic longitudinal Vp and transversal Vs
waves and unit weight γ were used in developing a geodynamic ground model to the
investigation depth of 30 m. The values of these parameters are given in the form of
tables.
Table 1 shows a geodynamic ground model to the depth of 30 m.

Table 1
Elastic Seismic Wave Velocity Unit Weight
Lithological Medium km/s
KN/m³
Vp Vs
Medium 1 0.40 0.20 18.5-19.0
Medium 2 1.10 0.35 19.0-19.5
Medium 3 1.60 0.45 19.5-20.0
Table 2 shows a geodynamic ground model to the depth of 30 m.

Table 2
Elastic Seismic Wave Velocity Unit Weight
Lithological Medium km/s
Vp Vs KN/m³
Medium 1 0.30 0.15 18.5-19.0
Medium 2 1.20 0.40 19.0-19.5
Medium 3 1.70 0.60 19.5-20.0
14
along the profile route (Table 1) indicated a three-layer medium.

Medium Longitudinal Wave VP Transversal VS Wave Poisson’s
(m/s) (m/s)
Medium 1 400 200 0.33
Medium 2 1100 350 0.44
Medium 3 1600 450 0.46

wave velocities measured at refraction seismic profile PR-5 are presented in Table 4.
Table 4
3
Medium 1 400 200 0.33 1.85-1.90 198-203 74-76
Medium 2 1100 350 0.44 1.90-1.95 709-728 233-239
Medium 3 1600 450 0.46 1.95-2.00 1080 -1090 395 - 405
15
along the route of profile PR-6 (Table 2) indicated a three-layer medium.

Medium Longitudinal Wave VP Transversal VS Wave Poisson’s
(m/s) (m/s)
Medium 1 300 150 0,33
Medium 2 1200 400 0,44
Medium 3 1700 600 0,43

wave velocities measured at refraction seismic profile PR-6 are presented in Table 6.
Table 6
3
Medium 1 300 150 0.33 1.85-1.90 111-114 42-43
Medium 2 1200 400 0.44 1.90-1.95 849-866 304-312
Medium 3 1700 600 0.43 1.95-2.00 1979 - 2030 702 - 720
The approximate value of deformation modulus was assessed by using the following
correlation dependence:
LogVS = 0,6logEdrf + 1,55
Where: VS – given in m/s and deformation modulus Edef in MPa.
The above formula cannot be applied to rocky and semi-rocky grounds and for that
reason it was not used for the assessment of deformation moduluses for marls and
limestones. Results obtained by using the above formula are presented in the tables
below per medium and per refraction seismic profile.

Medium 1 200 18
Medium 2 400 45
Medium 3 500 69

Medium 1 200 11
Medium 2 350 57
Medium 3 500 111
16
REPORT
ON PERFORMANCE OF GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND
DETERMINATION OF DESIGN SEISMICITY PARAMETERS FOR
BRIDGE OVER THE SAVA RIVER ON THE ROUTE OF
HIGHWAY KUZMIN – SREMSKA RAČA (BORDER CROSSING
POINT)
BELGRADE
2019
The report was prepared by:
Geophysical investigations:
Vojislav Samolov, Graduate Geol.Eng. Department of Applied Geophysics
Seismological investigations:
Slobodan Nedeljković, M.Sc.Geol.Eng. Department of Applied Geophysics -
Seismologists
Vojislav Samolov, Graduate Geol.Eng. Department of Applied Geophysics
17
Seismological Investigations:
1. INTRODUCTION
2. EARTHQUAKE REGULATIONS AND SEISMIC HAZARD
3. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE CATEGORY
4. SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
4.1. SEISMO-TECTONIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
4.1.1. ANALYSIS OF AUTOCHTHONOUS SEISMO-TECTONIC HAZARD
4.1.2. ANALYSIS OF ALLOCHTHONOUS HAZARD
5. SEISMIC HAZARD AND ITS ENGINEERING PARAMETRISATION BASED

ON GEOTECHNICAL COMPOSITION OF THE GROUND AT SUBJECT
LOCATION
6. DESIGN SEISMICITY PARAMETERS
6.1. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF EUROCODE EC8
6.2. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF NATIONAL RULEBOOK

(Equivalent Static Load Method)
18
1. INTRODUCTION
The planned bridge over the Sava River shall be constructed on the route of Kuzmin –
Sremska Rača highway, at the border crossing point. The approximate highway route is
presented in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. Highway Route with Kuzmin – Bosut Section
For the purpose of constructing the subject bridge, adequate geotechnical and geophysical
investigations were carried out at the subject site. Results of these investigations were
used in defining design parameters of seismicity, which should be taken into account in
earthquake calculations. The earthquake excitation at the subject site was determined
based on epicentral zones generating earthquakes that had shook the site in the past with
the intensity over 5° on seismic scale. This excitation was determined for earthquake
calculations both in accordance with Serbian Rulebook and with Eurocode EC8.
Introduction of Eurocode EC8 in the engineering practice in addition to official procedure

of earthquake calculation (the method of equivalent static load) requires a special-
purpose seismological map, which is necessary for the Eurocode EC8 procedure. In other
words, the seismic degree indicated on the official seismological map has to be replaced
with referent peak ground acceleration of “A” type. Unfortunately, experts tend to
propose the variants of seismological map intended for Eurocode EC8 purposes but they
cannot be considered official. Such variants of seismological map has also been proposed
by the Seismological Survey of Serbia, Belgrade, and put on its website without any
notice that these are not official variants (because this institution is not authorised to
adopt official seismological maps), which caused confusion among designers.
In our approach to the seismic micro-zoning, we abided by the official seismological

map, which was adjusted for earthquake calculations in accordance with Eurocode EC8.
19
We also mentioned in the text the variant of the seismological map proposed by the
Seismological Survey of Serbia, Belgrade.
2. EARTHQUAKE REGULATIONS AND SEISMIC HAZARD
Officially, earthquake prevention is implemented in Serbia in line with the “Rulebook on

Technical Norms for the Construction of High-Rise Buildings in Seismic Areas” (Official
Gazette of the SFR Yugoslavia 31/81 and its later amendments given in the Official
Gazettes of SFR Yugoslavia No. 49/82, 29/83, 21/88 and 52/90.
Eurocode EN 1998-1:2004 Eurocod 8: “Design of structures for earthquake resistance” –

Part 1. IT.DGKS (translation), Belgrade, November 2009 is also used in practice in
Serbia for earthquake calculations, although EC8 is not a part of official regulations.
In the procedure of earthquake calculations in accordance with Serbian Rulebook
(method of equivalent static load) seismicity coefficient KS is used as input design
parameter for earthquake calculation and ground category is determined for the selection
of dynamic coefficient Kd.
Eurocode EN 1998-1:2004 Eurocode 8 uses the value of referent peak acceleration of
“A” type ground as input design parameter for earthquake calculation, which is
multiplied by the value of structure category “  1 ” and is called design acceleration
ag =  1 agr.
Each National Earthquake Rulebook comprises two parts, the part related to the
earthquake calculation procedure (where earthquake risk is calculated) and the part
related to seismic hazard. Seismic risk and seismic hazard are narrowly interrelated and
this relation has to be harmonised. It practically means that construction of an
earthquake-resistant structure increases the costs but avoided damages in case of design
earthquake have to exceed the additional construction costs of the given earthquake-
resistant structure. It is on this fact that the protection against earthquake is based and
Rulebook on Construction of Earthquake-Resistant Structures is passed. It should be
noted that currently relevant seismological map, which has been used since 1990, was
tested during several strong earthquakes that occurred in Serbia in the meantime
and it did not require any corrections, which means that it was confirmed in
practice. This fact shows that there are many reasons to continue with the adjustment
of seismic risk to the seismic hazard indicated in the currently official seismological
map.
Based on the results of several-years long implementation of UNESK Project, the

Federal Institute for Standardisation of Yugoslavia signed a contract with the Yugoslav
Seismological Association on 09.06.1982 to prepare a Seismological Map for the
Territory of the State of SFR Yugoslavia for the return periods of 50, 100, 200, 500,
1,000 and 10,000 years in the scale of 1:1,000,000, and this task was performed by the
seismological institutes in the capitals of each Republic. In this map, seismic intensity is
given in the degrees of seismic scale MSK and occurrence probability of intensity on
each seismological tracing paper map is 63%. Errors in the contour lines of various
intensities are ±5 km. The seismic intensity in its limit area refers to the average
characteristics of the ground in that area. It was also pointed out that this map should be
reviewed once in 5 years or after occurrence of earthquake with the parameters that
require modifications. This map was put in official use in 1990 and it was recommended
for Category II and Category III structures to use the tracing paper map of earthquakes
with the return period of 500 years. Practically, seismic risk is 10% for the structures
20
of this category in their lifetime of 50 years, which equals the value of seismic risk
prescribed in Eurocode EC8. In the past years, since this seismological has been put in
use, the tracing paper map with the return period of 500 years was tested for the effects
of strong earthquakes in the epicentral area of Mionica, Trstenik and Kraljevo, and it
did not have to be modified. This confirmation in practice shows that the quality of the
map is such that it can be used as a basis in earthquake prevention in Serbia. It
should be emphasised, however, that seismic micro-zoning of the subject location
involves adjustment of the seismic degree from the seismological map to the ground
at the given location. After adjustment to the ground at the subject location, acceleration
amplitude (seismicity coefficient) is determined for the purpose of earthquake
calculation and ground category is determined based on which the Designer selects
the value of category coefficient K0.
The method described below was applied in seismic micro-zoning of the subject location
(for Eurocode EC8). Seismic degree for the earthquake return periods of 100 and 500
years from the tracing paper maps was reduced to Category “A” required by EC8,
and then it was parametrised by expressing the seismic hazard through referent
peak ground acceleration agr for “A” type grounds. In that way, the principles of
earthquake prevention adopted in Serbia were abided by and they were harmonised
with the Eurocode EC8 requirements for earthquake calculation procedure.
In practice, seismological maps are often taken from the website of the Seismological
Survey of Serbia and these maps are recommended by this institution for earthquake
calculations by Eurocode EC8 procedure. The Seismological Survey, however, is not
authorised to adopt official seismological maps and the Designers should be informed
accordingly, which is being done in this Report. The first map that the Seismological
Survey put on its website is given in Figure 2 below.
21
Fig. 2 Illustration of a seismological map by acceleration parameter that was available at
the website of the Seismological Survey of Serbia until 2108 without any note that it is
not an official map
The magazine “Izgradnja” (Construction) No. 1-2 (January-March) published in 2018

contained a paper titled “Seismic Micro-Zoning of Belgrade”, which was prepared by
Vinsen W. Lee, Mihajlo D. Trifunac, Borko Bulajić, Miodrag I. Manić, Davorka Herak
and Marjan Herak. This paper offered a review of the map presented in Figure 2. On page
18 of this paper, it is mentioned that the authors of this paper identified some problems in
22
the methods used for the preparation of the map presented in Figure 2 of this Report. The
presente valued underestimate peak ground acceleration by around 2 times as it is
documented in Figure 3. It should be noted that Vinsen W. Lee developed the program
used in the preparation of the seismological map given at the website of the
Seismological Survey of Serbia, Belgrade, and this map is presented in Figure 2.
Fig.3 Upper limit for peak ground accelerations given as the values of PSA(T) =
(g), which were calculated from UHS amplitudes for T= 0.04 sec and only for local
seismicity within 175 km from the subject site (Lee et. al. 2011b). Contributions from
Vrančea earthquake focus in Romania are not included in these values. The presented
contours show 10% exceedance values and exposure period of T=50 years (taken from
Lee and Trifunac, 2017).
The website of the Seismological Survey of Serbia currently offers the seismological map
given in Figure 4 below.
23
Fig. 4 Illustration of a seismological map by acceleration parameter that is currently
available at the website of the Seismological Survey of Serbia without any note that it is
not an official map
The difference between the values of acceleration amplitudes and their spatial
distribution is huge even in no seismic event that would cause such differences occurred
in the meantime. Apart from that, it is unacceptable that acceleration amplitude in
Belgrade area equals the amplitude in Lazarevac area because earthquake epicentre zone
in Lazarevac area has magnitudes over M>6.0 units on Richter scale.
The above review of the seismological maps available on the website of the
Seismological Survey of Serbia, which is given in this Report, is not a debate, but an
24
explanation to the Designer why official regulations i.e. official seismological map
was used in preparing this Report.
The Rulebook on Amendments of the Rulebook on Technical Norms for the Construction
of High-Rise Buildings in Seismic Areas (Official Gazette of SFR Yugoslavia No.
52/90), Article 1, specifies the following:
“All high-rise buildings in the territory of SFRY are located in seismic areas, according
to seismological maps of SFRY prepared for earthquake return periods of 50, 100, 200,
500, 1,000 and 10,000 years, which are an integral part of this Rulebook”.
Article 2, Paragprah 2, of the above Amendment specifies the following:
“Seismological map of SFRY prepared for the earthquake return period of 500
years shall be used for designing of high-rise buildings classified as Category 2 and
Category 3”.
Paragraph 3 of Article 2 stipulates “that seismic hazard and required parameters for
designing of high-rise buildings can be also determined by seismic micro-zoning of the
area”, which is at the same the basis for detailed analysis of design seismicity
parameters of the subject area. It should be also noted that seismicity information from
the map in the scale of 1:1,000.000 is not detailed enough and therefore it has to
include certain safety factor. The seismic micro-zoning based on collection of detailed
information reduces the above-mentioned safety factor by particular value.
Selection of the adequate tracing paper map depends on the category of the structure
that is to be constructed. Seismicity of the location on the official seismological map
where a structure is planned to be constructed is the basic seismicity and it should be used
as a starting point for determining numerical values of design seismicity parameters. For
that reason, although structure categorisation is within the designer’s competence, we
determined the category of the structure at the subject location for our own needs.
3. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE CATEGORY
Structure categorisation was introduced for the purpose of fulfilling the requirement that
structures of the same category should have the same seismic risk in relation to the
expected seismic hazard. Therefore, structures of the same category have the same
lifetime and this lifetime is compared with the earthquake return period, which is
identical for all such structures. In that way, seismic risk is determined and it becomes
identical for all structures of the same category.
Definition of structure category is within the competence of structural engineers.

However, selection of the tracing paper map that is relevant for the assessment of
seismicity of the location of the given structure depends, in accordance with the
Rulebook, on the structure category.
In categorising high-rise buildings for earthquake conditions, the following starting
points are evaluated:
- Consequences of structure collapse on wide social community;
25
- Public interest for the subject structure to retain its function even during and after
earthquake occurrence;
- Potential casualties caused by structure destruction;
- Valuable of extremely important contents deposited in the structure, which are of

significance for the wide community.
The National Rulebook and its amendments specify four categories of structures. and the
subject bridge can be classified as Category 1 structure by the importance of its function.
For that reason, the tracing paper map of the official seismological map with the return
period of 500 years was used for initial assessment of seismicity of the subject location.
According to bridge categorisation in Eurocode EC8, the subject bridge belongs to the
above average category.
4. SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
Seismic hazard is danger from earthquakes and it can be represented on seismological

map as a seismic degree in the average ground covered by the given seismic degree or as
an amplitude of peak referent acceleration in rocky ground of “A” type.
Parametrisation of seismic degrees on seismic scale by adequate values of amplitude
intervals of ground oscillation and motion acceleration is a process that is still researched.
Until 1990 seismic degrees were presented on official seismological maps in MCS
(Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg) scale and the present official map uses European scale MSK-
1964. Table 1 below shows interval values of acceleration that correspond to the given
seismic degree.
Table 1: Acceleration per Seismic Degree on MCS and MSK-64 Seismic Scales
Earthquake Degree Acceleration on MCS Scale Acceleration on
(cm/s2) MSK-1964m Scale (cm/s2)
6 5.1-10 30-60
7 10.1-25 61-120
8 25.1-50 121-240
9 50.1-100 241-480
Based on the above acceleration values (given in Table 1 above), it can be concluded that
abrupt increase of acceleration amplitudes between degrees is represented by factor 2.
The factor with the value 2 has been commonly accepted and it was introduced by B.
Gutenberg based on analysis of previously available instrumental data. New data,
however, show that the value of this factor should be 2.5. Apart from that, it has been
concluded that the abrupt increase of oscillation velocity and motion amplitude between
degrees is not as given in MSK-1964 scale.
Table 2 below shows numerical values of engineering parameters that correspond to

seismic degrees used in technical references.
Table 2: Values of engineering parameters that correspond to various seismic degrees as

taken from the design of the new National Russian Seismic Scale. European seismic scale
26
does not contain values of the above-mentioned engineering parameters that correspond
to particular seismic degrees.
Parameter Seismic Intensity I in Degrees
6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5
2
PGA (sm/s ) 44 70 110 180 280 440 700 1100
PGV (sm/s) 3.8 6.5 11 19 33 57 98 170
PGD (sm) 0.66 1.4 3.2 7 15 33 72 160
95 150 240 380 605 955 1515 2400
1,5
(sm/s )
Log( 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.9 4.3 4.7 5.0
2 3
sm /s
It should be noted that acceleration amplitude with fixed frequency of 2.5 Hz does not
correspond to the peak amplitude. Apart from that, analysis of registered instrumental
data shows that formula PGA=PGDx(2 should not be used because it
corresponds to sinusoid and that it is around 7 times lower than the actual one in real
records.
It should be also noted that the values of parameters given in Table 2 above correspond
to instrumental records made to the depth of 2.5 m. In addition, earthquake intensity
is larger in soft grounds than in hard grounds with the same acceleration values and this
fact indicates that seismic intensity is not influenced only by seismic oscillation level.
Duration of oscillations is also of importance, which is also confirmed by Aries
intensity or the time interval in which the envelope of acceleration amplitudes exceeds
one half of the peak magnitude.
Apart from that, the duration of oscillations with the amplitudes over 0.5Amax varies for
accelerations and velocities of oscillations and motions.
The updated Russian seismic scale (Table 3 below) contains the following correlation of
instrumental earthquake oscillation parameters per intensity on seismic scale (A – peak
acceleration amplitude, V – amplitude of peak particle oscillation velocity, D – peak
motion amplitude, Dplast – permanent ground displacement)
Table 3
I A(sm/s2) V(sm/s) D(sm) Dplast(sm)
2 0.7 – 1.7 (1.1) 0.029 – 0.086 (0.5) 0.0006 – 0.0028 (0.0013)
3 1.7 – 4.3 (2.8) 0.086 – 0.25 (0.15) 0.0028 – 0.014 (0.0062)
4 4.3 – 11 (6.9) 0.25 – 0.75 (0.44) 0.014 – 0.065 (0.030)
5 11 – 27 (18) 0.75 – 2.2 (1.3) 0.065 – 0.31 (0.14) 0.025
6 27 – 70 (44) 2.2 – 6.5 (3.8) 0.31 – 1.5 (0.68) 0.026 – 0.40 (0.10)
7 70 – 180 (110) 6.5 – 19 (11) 1.5 – 7.1 (3.3) 0.40 – 4.0 (1.2)
8 180 – 440 19 – 57 (33) 7.1 – 34 (16) 4.0 – 30 (11)
(280)
9 440 – 1090 57 – 170 (98) 34 – 164 (75) 30 – 160 (70)
(690)
10 160 – 600 (300)
11 600 – 1600 (1000)
12 >1600
27
The values in brackets are median values of the relevant parameters.
In the present ground categorisation (in our rulebook: good, fair and poor) in Eurocode
EC8 and in the USA, it is predominantly determined through velocity of transversal
waves in the surface part of a geological medium with the thickness of 30 meters.
Adequate relation of ground systematisations in the USA and in our rulebook is presented
in Table 4 below.
Table 4
International E D C B A
building code
VS (m/s) 60 90 120 150 180 200 250 300 350 400 600 750 2500
Rulebook Poor ground Fair Ground Good ground
Table 5 below shows categorisation of ground used in the USA according to

classification (BSSC, 2003)
Table 5. Ground Category According to Classification (BSSC, 2003)

Ground Ground Description Velocity of Resistance to Undrained
Class Transversal Waves Number of Strength
VS (m/s) in Upper 30 Penetration Kpa
m Blows N
A Hard rock <1500 - -
B Rocky ground 760 - 1500 - -
C Very dense soil or 360 - 760 >50 >100
fractured rocky ground
CD Soil with properties 270 - 555 15 - 50 50 - 100
between Classes C and D
D Dense disperse ground 180 - 360 15 - 50 50 - 100
DE Soil with properties 90 - 270 15 - 50 50 - 100
between Classes D and E
E Loose disperse soil <180 <15 <50
F Soil requiring site-specific
evaluations
In Eurocode EC8, earthquake effect on the ground surface is a result of the geological
medium with the thicness of 30 meters and its engineering-geological and
hydrogeological properties. For the classification of a 30 m thick bedded geological
medium Eurocode EC8 requires use of the averaged value of shearing wave velocity
VS ,30 , which is calculated by applying the following formula:
30
VS ,30  n
h
1 Vi
i
Where: hi and Vi are thickness in (meters) and shearing wave velocity (at the level of
seismic dilatations of the order of 105 or less) for layer i , out of the total of n in the
upper 30 meters of depth. Ground categorisation given in Eurocode EC8 in the form of
28
tables is used in selecting the ground conditions at the given location and it is presented
in Table 6 below.
Table 6: Parameters of Geological Media (Ground) Categories in Accordance with

Eurocode EC8
Parameters
Ground Description of Geological Section VS ,30 NSPT Cu
Category (m/s) Blows/ kPa
30cm
A Rock or other rock-like geological >800 ----- --
formation, including at most 5 m of weaker
material at the surface
B Deposits of very dense sand, gravel, or very 360 - 800 >50 >250
stiff clay, at least several tens of meters in
thickness, characterised by a gradual
increase of mechanical properties with
depth
C Deep deposits of dense or medium dense 180 - 360 15 - 50 70 -250
sand, gravel or stiff clay with thickness
from several tens to many hundreds of
meters
D Deposits of loose-to-medium cohesionless <180 <15 <70
soil (with or without some soft cohesive
layers), or of predominantly soft-to-firm
cohesive soil
E A soil profile consisting of a surface
alluvium layer with Vs z0 values of type C or
D and thickness varying between about 5 m
and 20 m, underlain by stiffer material
with Vs > 500 m/s.
S1 Deposits consisting, or containing a layer <100 ----------. 10-20
at least 10 m thick, of soft clays/silts with a
high plasticity index (PL > 40) and high
water content
S2 Deposits of liquefiable soils, of sensitive
clays, or any other soil profile not included
in types A – E or S1
Practically, mean ground or Category 2 ground in the National Rulebook

predominantly corresponds to ground Category “C” ground and a part of Category
“B” according to Eurocode EC8.
Eurocode EC8 points to the need to determine peak amplitude of referent acceleration in
a geological medium of “A” type. In this analysis, a transition was made from the
National Seismological Map to the map required by Eurocode EC8. This transition
was made by reducing seismic degree indicated on the official seismological map for
the subject location to correspond to “A” ground type and then the resulting seismic
degree at the subject location was expressed as referent peak acceleration a gr .
29
Previous officially used seismological maps showed various intensities for the route of
the subject highway that includes the subject bridge. On the seismological map from
1950 it is in the zone of seismic degree 5°, on the seismological map showing zoning of
Serbia it is the zone of degree 6° and on the temporary seismological map it is in the zone
of degree 6°.
Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8 show the location of the subject Kuzmin – Sremska Rača highway,
including the subject bridge, on the tracing paper maps of the official seismological map
with the earthquake return periods of 50 years, 100 years, 200 years and 500 years,
respectively.
Fig. 5 Location of Kuzmin – Sremska Rača highway and the subject bridge is indicated
on the map with a square, showing that they are located in the zone of degree 6°
30
31
on the map, showing that they are located in the zone of degree 8°
Eurocode EC8 requires the seismic risk for “damage limitation” and “no-collapse”
requirement to be 10%. It means that for the “damage limitation” requirement,
earthquake with the given intensity is expected to occur once in 100 years in the
operation period of 10 years. For the “damage limitation” requirement, earthquake with
the given intensity is also expected to occur once in 500 years in the operation period of
50 years.
Table 7 shows that earthquake with the intensity of 7° has the return periods of 50 years
and 100 years and this fact indicates seismic risk higher than 10%. Apart from that,
seismic risk higher than 10% is also obtained for the “no-collapse” requirement because
it occurs with the return periods of 200 years and 500 years.
EC8 also stipulates use of tracing paper maps with the return periods of 100 years
and 500 years i.e. two tracing paper maps with the above return periods are to be
prepared. The seismological map from the National Rulebook is far more informative
because it also provides information about earthquakes with the return periods of 50, 200,
1,000 and 10,000 years and gives occurrence probabilities of their intensities. This very
important information about seismicity for the time periods of 50 years, 200 years and
1,000 ears is omitted in EC8, which insists exclusively on the tracing paper maps with
the return periods of 100 years and 500 years.
Detailed analysis of seismic hazard for further seismic calculations requires, in line with
the official regulations, assessment of specific characteristics of autochthonous and
allochthonous earthquake effects on the subject location. Effects of autochthonous
seismicity are taken into account in EC8 through requirement not to build
structures in the vicinity of seismically active faults. This effect of autochthonous
32
seismicity i.e. seismically active faults practically defines seismo-tectonic hazard, which
is a part of the total seismic hazard for the subject location.
4.1. SEISMO-TECTONIC HAZARD ANALYSIS
The route of the subject highway that includes the subject bridge lies in the geographic
region of Srem. This region is presented in Figure 9 below.
Fig.9. Geographic Region of Srem
Figure 10 below shows distribution of seismogenic lines determined by M. Uzelac. Based

on these lines, she defined contour lines of sesimogenic blocks. In her note in Figure 10,
M. Uzelac points out the following:
Some seismogenic lines have not been determined reliably as yet but some of them have
and the following four seismogenic blocks have been identified: I. Hopovo block, II. Irig
block, III. Beočin block and block No. IV lying between extension of line 5, which
stretches to Zemun, and line 6, which reaches Novi Slankamen; its edge is best defined in
Mount Fruška Gora – line 1, between Sremski Karlovci and Bukovac.
I. Hopovo block lies between lines 1, 2, 4 and 5.
II. Irig block – its northern perimeter coincides with the southern perimeter of Hopovo
block and its south edge is seismogenic line 3. Earthquakes of high intensities occurred in
this line.
III. Beočin block – in the north it is bounded by seismogenic line 7, where a number of
strong earthquakes occurred. Its southern perimeter coincides with the northern perimeter
of Hopovo block along seismogenic line 1, where disastrous earthquakes occurred. Its
eastern perimeter is bounded by a part of sesimogenic line 6 between Novi Sad,
Petrovaradin and Sremski Karlovci, where autochthonous processes are present. The
western perimeter of this block is not well defined, but the line connecting Beočin,
Čerević and Novi Futog settlements could be considered its boundary.
In the general part, M Uzelac states the following: “The fact is that the most evident
seismic motions in entire Fruška Gora area occurred around its highest relief, but
disastrous earthquakes from those epicentres did not cover a large area. Hopovo block
behaves as an immobile block and in its tendency to move, it pressurises other blocks,
mostly to the northeast.
33
Fig.10. Schematically Defined Seismogenic Blocks in Fruška Gora Area
(M. Uzelac 1951)
As mentioned above, analysis of seismo-tectonic hazard includes analysis of
autochthnonous and allochthonous seismicity, as well as analysis of their effects on the
subject location and the structures that are to be constructed.
Fault tectonics is of high significance for seismicity of the given area. Namely “live”
faults could act as sources i.e. hypocentres of earthquakes and if not, they influence the
attenuation degree of seismic energy carried by earthquake waves on their way to the
investigated area.
Seismicity is related to neotectonic activities but neotectonic faults that have shown
their seismic activity in Quaternary period are of particular significance for man-made
structures.
Faults located in the vicinity of the subject location are considered “live” faults if they
generate earthquakes and as such they are the source of the so-called autochthonous
seismicity in the subject area.
Back at the time when M. Uzelac made her analysis, earthquake occurrence was not
considered related to neotectonic faults. For that reason, Figure 11 below illustrates
neotectonic faults in Vojvodina region according to B. Sikošek.
34
Fig.11. Detail of Seismo-Tectonic Map of Vojvodina Region (B. Sikošek)
Figure 11 shows that B. Sikošek did not identify neotectonic faults in the investigated
area and at the location of the subject bridge.
M. Marović and I. Djoković indicated neotectonic faults on their neotectonic map and a
detail of this map related to the highway area and location of the subject bridge is given
in Figure 12 below.
Figure 12 shows that neotectonic Sava fault is located in the vicinity of the bridge
location and that it bounds Sremska Mitrovica neotectonic block, intersecting the main
Sava fault in the subject area.
Apart from that, it can be concluded that the bridge location belongs to the zone where
the thickness of Tertiary deposits is assessed to be 0.5 km. This value shows that
velocity of neotectonic and recent motions would not have any effect on the bridge
location or the bridge itself, regardless of its length.
35
Fig 12. Detail of Neotectonic Map (M. Marović, I Djoković) related to the investigated
area that includes the subject highway and the bridge
4.1.1. ANALYSIS OF AUTOCHTHONOUS SEISMO-TECTONIC HAZARD
Autochthonous seismicity is caused by seismogenic faults in the immediate vicinity of

the location of the subject structure. Identification of a sesimogenic fault primarily refers
to its seismogenic activity, which manifests as generation of earthquakes.
The completed analysis shows that neotectonic faults in the immediate vicinity of the
bridge location are not seismogenic and that they have not generated earquakes so far.
Presence of those neotectonic faults is not a limitation for construction of a bridge at
the subject location since they are not seismogenic.
4.1.2. ANALYSIS OF ALLOCHTHONOUS HAZARD
Allochthonous seismic hazard involves identification of distant epicentral zones that

generate strong earthquakes, which could cause intensities over five degrees of the
seismic scale in the subject area. The analysis shows that strong earthquakes that occure
at the distance of 45 km to 60 km from the subject location have effect on its seismicity.
Strong earthquakes generated in the area of Fruška Gora are closest to the subject
location and historical data about the strongest earthquakes that occurred in this area as
given by M. Uzelac in her paper are presented below.
 20.12.1739 – we have data about a disastrous earthquake on the northern slopes of Mount
Fruške Gore. Historical records mention two earthquakes that struck Ledinci village and
its surroundings on that date. The first earthquake occurred around 15 h and the second
one about midnight the same day. The record reads: “The ground shook at the time of
36
afternoon prayer and in the middle of the night and at midnight and many homes were
destroyed.” It is believed that Sremski Karlovci, Novi Sad and probably Ilok as well were
damaged.
 About one month later, on 24.01.1740, we have data that a strong earthquake caused
damage on the southern slopes of Mount Fruška Gora, in Hopovo, Grgeteg, Remeta and
Vrdnik. Two shocks are mentioned: one in the afternoon and the second at midnight. The
record reads: “The ground shook two times, after noon and at midnight, very much.”
 On 12.12.1740, another disastrous earthquake occurred. “Terrible earthquake in Hopovo,
Grgeteg and Remeta.
 On 10.08.1751, a strong earthquake occurred in the same epicentral area, almost
destroying Hopovo Monastery.
 On 02.12.1764 at night, a strong earthquake occurred in Petrovaradin.
 In 1789, a disastrous earthquake in Srem caused severe damage, particularly in Sremski
Karlovci.
 On 11.10.1907 at 04 h and 45 m, a strong earthquake occurred in the surroundings of
Lednicni, where several chimneys collapsed and several houses cracked.
Seismo-tectonic conditions prevailing in the area of Mount Fruška Gora were valorised
by seismogenic potential that could generate earthquakes with the magnitudes of M=6.0 -
6.3 units on Richter scale. This epicentral zone lies at the distance of 45 km from the
subject bridge location.
The epicentral zone of Krupanj and Loznica lies at the distance of around 50-60 km from
the subject location but effects of its strong earthquakes are smaller that effects of strong
Fruška Gora earthquakes. Effects of strong earthquakes generated in epicentral zones in
Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina are also smaller that the effects of strong Fruška
Gora earthquakes.
5. SEISMIC HAZARD AND ITS ENGINEERING PARAMETRISATION BASED

ON GEOTECHNICAL COMPOSITION OF THE GROUND AT SUBJECT
LOCATION
The completed analysis shows seismicity of the subject location is largely influenced by
strong earthquakes from epicentral areas of Mount Fruška Gora (Ledinci, Hopovo) at the
epicentral distances of 45 km and 55 km, respectively, and with the magnitudes of M=6,0
– 6,3 unts on Richter scale.
The approach in processing of instrumental data about occurred earthquakes that takes
into account details of the impact zones provides various correlations and correlations
offered by Prof. F.F. Apitkaev and Ambrose are used below.
Effects of strong earthquakes that are responsible for the upper threshold of seismicity of
the subject location were analysed by valorising both the above facts and more recent
correlations, which integrated and processed newly collected instrumental data.
In that way, it was determined that attenuation of acceleration amplitudes in the
neighbouring epicentral zone had its specific characteristics. It was concluded that the
following three subzones are present within this zone: focal, closer and more distant
zone.
37
The closer zone stretches from the distance R0 (km) to the distance R1, where
acceleration amplitude reaches the value of a = 170 sm/s2. Distance R1 is determined by
applying the following formula:
log R1 = 0.33M – 0,61
Table 7 below shows the values of distance R1 for the magnitude interval M = 6.0 – 6.5.
Table 7
Magnitude 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5
R1 (km) 23.4 27.3 29.4 31.8 34.3
The completed analysis shows that the subject location lies in the more distant
epicentral zone of effects of strong Fruška Gora earthquakes and therefore PGA
amplitude was calculated by applying the following formula:
log PGA = 0.634M – 1.92logR + 1.076 ± 0.18
Where: M – magnitude of the given earthquake; R- distance between the location and
epicentre. By applying the above formula, PGA values were calculated for the epicentral
distances of 45 km and 55 km and these values are given in Table 8 below.
Table 8
Magnitude 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3
PGA (sm/s2) (79) (88) (103) (120)
45 km 51 58 68 79
(34) (38) (45) (52)
PGA (sm/s2) (52) (60) (70) (86)
55 km 35 40 46 54
(23) (26) (30) (36)
(Upper and lower values of acceleration amplitudes are given in brackets)
Earthquake duration is not valorised in the methodology used in earthquake

calculations stipulated in the seismic rulebook, but practice and investigations show that
it is not justified.
It should be noted that correlation of seismic intensity and characteristics of seismic

oscillations is used for describing the accelerogram amplitude envelope:
I  I ( a, t1, t2, t3, t4 ) , where: a – maximum acceleration amplitude; ti - time interval
between to set envelope levels. The sum of the above time intervals gives the duration of
the process and the part of the time interval in which Aob  0,5 Amax is called impulse
duration. Parameter A ob is current envelope amplitude. Impulse width has a crucial effect
on seismic intensity. Investigations have pointed to possible change by two seismic
degrees, depending on the impulse width, although all other parameters are unchanged.
The duration on accelerogram is the so-called time history. The time history as a notion
can be treated in various manners. “Absolute” duration is duration of acceleration
amplitude at the level above a fixed value, for instance 0,05 g . “Relative” duration is
38
duration of oscillation amplitudes at the level above a part (i.e. percentage) of the peak
amplitude.
Apart from that, duration of the strong part of oscillations, which contains 90% of total
energy or intensity is used in practice and this duration is calculated according to Aries
t0

(the author of the proposal) by using the following integral: I A 
2g
 a (t )dt , where: t
2
0 -
0
general length of record. Investigations have shown that the condition required by the
above integral is fulfilled if duration of the amplitude level exceeding 20% of the peak
amplitude is considered and this time duration is usually called effective duration.
The minimum number of independent parameters that describe seismic oscillations of the
ground for engineering purposes would be around four and they are follows: peak
amplitude, period corresponding to this amplitude, width of seismic impulse and
logarithmic width of spectrum. Seismic intensity is more influenced by amplitude level
than the time duration but the speed of amplitude increase to the peak value is also of
high significance.
Impulse width i.e. time interval in which amplitudes of seismic oscillations exceed one
half of the peak amplitude was calculated by applying the following formula:
log d  0,2M  0,5 log   C 1  C 2
The constant C 1 depends on ground conditions, which means that it is zero for average
ground, C 1  0,15 for loose soil C 1  0,15 for rocky ground. In this case, the
constant C 2 was adopted as C 2  1,3 . The values of oscillation durations in which
oscillation amplitudes exceed 0.5 PGAmax as calculated by applying the above formula
are given in Table 9 below.
Table 9
Magnitude M=6.0 Epicentral distance 45 km Duration d (sec)
Average ground d=5.3 sec
Magnitude M=6.3 Epicentral distance 45 km Duration d (sec)

Average ground d=6.1 sec
The periods that correspond to peak amplitudes of oscillation velocity or particle

acceleration in the wide area of the subject location can be calculated by applying the
following formula:
 
log T( x, x )  0,15M  0,25 log   C
Where constant C depends on local conditions and its averaged value is C  1,9 , for
acceleration and C  1,5 for velocity.
The values of periods that correspond to PGA amplitudes calculated by using the above
formula are given in Table 10 below.
39
Table 10
Magnitude M=6.0 Epicentral distance 45 km T=0.26 sec
Magnitude M=6.3 Epicentral distance 45 km T=0.29 sec
The following values were obtained for earthquakes of Fruška Gora epicentral zone with
the magnitudes in the interval of 6.0 to 6.3 and epicentral distance of 45 km by using the
above formulas:
o For magnitude M = 6.0 and epicentral distance Δ = 45 km

Upper threshold of the peak acceleration amplitude is = 80 cm/s2
Periods that correspond to peak amplitudes T = 0.26 s
Impulse width d = 5.3 s
o For magnitude M=6,3 and epicentral distance Δ = 45 km
Upper threshold of the peak acceleration amplitude is = 100 cm/s2
Periods that correspond to peak amplitudes T = 0.29 s
Impulse width d = 6.1 s
For the purpose of determining conditions and reaching a decision regarding foundation
of the subject bridge, adequate required field geotechnical and geophysical
investigations were carried out. Results of these geophysical investigations are an
integral part of this report. The integrated results of geotechnical and geophysical
investigations were used for numerical definition of design seismicity parameters for the
purpose of calculating earthquake resistance of the subject structure and for formulating
recommendations regarding structure foundation from the aspect of seismological
conditions prevailing at the subject location.
Results of field geophysical measurements performed at the location of the subject

bridge to the depth of 30 meters showed that elastic response of the geological media on
the left and right side of the bridge was of three-layer type.
Refraction seismic investigations were performed at two refraction profiles with the
respective lengths of 144 m, which ensured penetration depth of 30 meters. Refraction
seismic profile PR-5 was measured on the left side of the Sava bridge and seismic profile
PR-6 was measured on the right side of the Sava bridge (right Sava riverbank).
Measurement results are presented in the tables below per profile.
Table PR-5 shows measurement results for seismic profile PR-5 (left Sava riverbank).
Table PR-5
Medium Transversal Wave Longitudinal Wave Thickness of
(lithological Velocity Velocity Lithological
members) VS (m/s) VP (m/s) Members
(m)
Medium 1 200 400 4.1
Medium 2 350 1100 11.8
Medium 3 450 1600 14.1
40
The mean value of transversal elastic wave velocity for the above model at seismic
profile PR-5 is 351 m/s and according of Eurocode EC8, the ground at this profile was
classified as Category “C”. According to classification used in National Rulebook, it
belongs to Category 2.
Table PR- shows measurement results for seismic profile PR-6 (right Sava riverbank).
Table PR-6
Medium Transversal Wave Longitudinal Wave Thickness of
(lithological Velocity VS (m/s) Velocity Lithological
members) VP (m/s) Members
(m)
Medium 1 150 300 4.1
Medium 2 400 1200 10.6
Medium 3 600 1700 15.3
The mean value of transversal elastic wave velocity for the above model at seismic
profile PR-6 is 378 m/s and according of Eurocode EC8, the ground at this profile was
classified as Category “C”. According to classification used in National Rulebook, it
belongs to Category 2.
6. DESIGN SEISMICITY PARAMETERS
According to National Rulebook, selection of the seismological tracing paper map that
is relevant for assessment of seismicity of the subject bridge location depends on the
structure category. In line with the National Rulebook, the seismologist is obliged to
select the seismological tracing paper map based on the structure category and such a
map should be used as a basis for the assessment of seismicity of the bridge location.
The subject bridge is an integral part of a highway that has international traffic elements
and it is one of the crucial structures that enable such a function. This fact classifies it as
a Category 1 structure according to the National Rulebook and “above average” category
according to Eurocode EC8. The decision is within the Designer’s competence.
Eurocode EC8 points to the need to determine peak amplitude of referent acceleration in
a geological medium of “A” type. In this analysis, a transition was made from the
National Seismological Map to the map required by Eurocode EC8. This transition
was made by reducing seismic degree indicated on the official seismological map for
the subject location to correspond to “A” ground type and then the resulting seismic
degree at the subject location was expressed as referent peak acceleration a gr .
The completed analysis shows that seismo-tectonic conditions (proximity of
seismogenic faults) at the bridge location are not a limitation for construction of a
bridge at the subject location.
General engineering-geological parameters of the effects of earthquakes with the retune
periods of 100 and 500 years are given below.
For the effects of earthquakes with the return period of 100 years, the engineering
properties are as follows:
Properties of seismic energy source
41
- Manner of faulting during earthquake generation – normal fault;
- Focal depth 10 km
Engineering parameters of location response
- Epicentral distance of the location from the focus 45 km;

- Peak acceleration amplitude sm/s2;
- Interval of periods that peak acceleration amplitudes could belong to with the
probability of 67% is 0.16 sec<0.26 sec< 0.41 sec.
- The width of impulse duration in which amplitudes exceed 40 sm/s2 is assessed to
be d = 5.3 s.
- The duration of oscillation process (record) is assessed to be around 26 sec.
For the effects of earthquakes with the return period of 500 years, the engineering
properties are as follows:
Properties of seismic energy source

- Manner of faulting during earthquake generation – normal fault;
- Focal depth 15 km
Engineering parameters of location response
- Epicentral distance of the location from the focus 45 km;

- Peak acceleration amplitude sm/s2;
- Interval of periods that peak acceleration amplitudes could belong to with the
probability of 67% is 0.19 sec <0.30 sec<0.48 sec;
- The width of impulse duration in which amplitudes exceed 50 sm/s2 is assessed to
be d = 6.1 s.
- The duration of oscillation process (record) is assessed to be around 31 sec.
6.1. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF EUROCODE EC8
It is proposed that the value of bridge importance factor according to Eurocode

corresponds to:
Above average (bridges of critical importance for communication, particularly after

storms – international communication). Final decision should be reached by the
Designer.
According to Eurocode EC8, the design acceleration of “A” type ground ag is the
product of the importance factor of the subject structure “  1 ” and referent peak
acceleration agr of “A” type ground i.e. ag =  1 agr.
The ground conditions at the bridge location are similar on the left and right
riverbank and according to EC8 categorisation, the ground belongs to Category “C”.
42
Therefore it can be adopted that there is no spatial variations of the ground along the
bridge.
For “damage limitation request” according to EC8 Part 2 – limited
damage (usability limit)
- “A” type of the ground, the value of peak acceleration is agr = 80 cm/s2 = 0.08 g
- Value of referent peak acceleration agr for “A” type ground agr = 80 cm/s2 should be
multiplied by the importance factor of the subject structure “  1 ”, which gives the
design acceleration of ag =  1 agr
- Ground category is of “C” type.
- Response spectrum 1 shall be used for earthquake calculation
For “no-collapse requirement” according to EC8 Part 2 – requirement for

failure prevention (limit condition of bearing-capacity)
- “A” type of the ground, the value of peak acceleration is agr = 100 cm/s2 = 0.10 g
- Value of referent peak acceleration agr for “A” type ground agr = 100cm/s2 should be
multiplied by the importance factor of the subject structure “  1 ”, which gives the
design acceleration of ag =  1 agr
- Ground category is of “C” type.
- Response spectrum 1 shall be used for earthquake calculation
From the aspect of seismic conditions, it is recommended to use deep foundations for
the bridge support, by driving piles with the bearing capacity predominantly based
on blades.
6.2. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR APPLICATION OF NATIONAL RULEBOOK

(Equivalent Static Load Method)
According to the Rulebook (Official Gazette of SFR Yugoslavia 31/81), seismic forces
are calculated by applying the method of equivalent static load and dynamic analysis
method for out-of-category structures.
The equivalent static load method involves calculation of the total horizontal seismic
force by applying the following formula:
S  KG
Where: K - total seismic coefficient, G  total weight of the structure.
Total seismic coefficient K is calculated by applying the following formula:
K  K0 K S K d K P
Where: K 0 - coefficient of structure category; K S - coefficient of seismic intensity;
K d dynamic coefficient; K P - ductility and attenuation coefficient.
43
Seismicity coefficient is calculated by applying the following formula:
a
Ks  0 ,25
g
Where: a – design acceleration; g – acceleration of gravity.
In determining design parameters of seismicity for the calculation by applying this

methodology, increased risk was valorised by recurrence parameter of the design
earthquake.
It is proposed for category coefficient of the Sava Bridge according to the National
Rulebook to be Category 1. Final decision should be reached by the Designer.
- Coefficient of seismic intensity K S =0.028
- Ordinate of dynamic coefficient Kd shall be selected for Category 2 of

the ground
Responsible Designers
___________________________________
Slobodan Nedeljković, M.Sc.Geol.Eng.
Department of Applied Geophysics – Seismologist
_____________________________
Vojislav Samolov, Graduate Geol.Eng.
Department of Applied Geophysics
44

Preliminary Geotechnical Report Bridge Savas. Raca-1 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Preliminary Geotechnical Report Bridge Savas. Raca-1 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

САОБРАЋАЈНИ ИНСТИТУТ ЦИП д.о.о.

11000 БЕОГРАД, НЕМАЊИНА 6/IV

1.1. TITLE PAGEНАСЛОВНА СТРАНА

Type of technical documents: Preliminary Design IDP

Name and designation of design part: Е1/1 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT -

Seal and signature: Designer:

Responsible design engineer:

No. of technical documents: 740 – 2/18

1.2. TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1. Title Page

1.3. DECISION ON APPOINTMENT OF RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER

RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER

Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng. 391 М042 13

Designer: INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION CIP Ltd.,

Responsible person/representative: General Manager: Milutin Ignjatović, Graduate Eng.

No. of technical documents: 740 – 2/18

1.4. STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBLE DESIGN ENGINEER

Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng.

Responsible Design Engineer: Miodrag Pisarević, Graduate Geol.Eng.

No. of technical documents: 740 – 2/18

1.5. TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS

ANNEX NO. NAME

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 1

2 TYPE AND SCOPE OF COMPLETED INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS

2.1 Previous Investigation Works

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 2

2.2 Investigation Works

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 3

2. C-5 24.0 80.19 6602985 4975581 4.3

3. C-7 24.2 80.30 6602960 4975518 3.8

4. C-9 22.0 80.48 6602928 4975418 3.8

5. C-11 26.0 79.43 6602938.5 4975344.0 3.0

6. C-12 24.0 81.16 6602903 4975288 3.5

7. C-15 25.0 80.29 6602891.5 4975131.6 3.5

8. C-17 25.0 80.80 6602892 4975019 4.2

9. C-19 40.0 80.23 6602877 4974925.5 4.2

10. C-20 30.0 74.72 6602882 4974800 -3.5

11. C-21 30.0 74.72 6602882 4974648 -3.4

12. C-22 30.0 80.35 6602878.4 4974563.4 4.7

13. C-24 25.0 80.1 6602872.7 4974464.4 4.9

Figure 2: Drilling Rig at the Location of Future Bridge Pier

2.2.3 Standard Penetration Tests – SPT

Table 3: Values of Empirical Parameter P and Dependence on Material Type

Cu=5 up to 7xN for N>5 Cu=5+7.5N for N<5

2.2.4 Cone Penetration Tests – СPT

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 5

Table 4: Basic Technical Data about Cone Penetration Tests (CPT)

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 6

Pt, OH – peat and organic high-

Figure 3: Proposed Interpretation Diagram for Normal Soil Types

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 7

Determination of identification-classification parameters:

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 8

Determination of soil deformability and shearing strength parameters

Results of laboratory tests of samples are given in Annex No. 5.

2.2.6 Geophysical and Seismic Investigations

2.2.7 Chemical Analysis of Water and Assessment of Aggressiveness to Concrete

3 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS AND TESTS

3.1 Geomorphologic Features

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 9

3.2 Geological Composition of the Ground

Alluvial-Flood Sediments – Flood Facies (ap)

2018 – 740 – 2/2018 Страна 10