Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    I. Aberratio Ictus: Week 3 C. Transferred Intent (Art. 4, Par. 1 See Also Art. 49, RPC)

    Uploaded by

    E L E N A
    This document appears to be class notes on the topic of transferred intent in criminal law. It includes: 1) Three types of transferred intent - aberratio ictus (error in aim), error in personae (error in identity of the person), and praeter intentionem (beyond intention). 2) The requirement for concurrence between the intent and the resulting harm for liability, along with discussion of causation. 3) The concept of impossible crimes, where the intent exists but the crime cannot be completed due to factual impossibility.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    I. Aberratio Ictus: Week 3 C. Transferred Intent (Art. 4, Par. 1 See Also Art. 49, RPC)

    Uploaded by

    E L E N A
    10 views1 page
    This document appears to be class notes on the topic of transferred intent in criminal law. It includes: 1) Three types of transferred intent - aberratio ictus (error in aim), error in personae (error in identity of the person), and praeter intentionem (beyond intention). 2) The requirement for concurrence between the intent and the resulting harm for liability, along with discussion of causation. 3) The concept of impossible crimes, where the intent exists but the crime cannot be completed due to factual impossibility.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    WEEK 3 CRIM.docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document appears to be class notes on the topic of transferred intent in criminal law. It includes: 1) Three types of transferred intent - aberratio ictus (error in aim), error in personae (error in identity of the person), and praeter intentionem (beyond intention). 2) The requirement for concurrence between the intent and the resulting harm for liability, along with discussion of causation. 3) The concept of impossible crimes, where the intent exists but the crime cannot be completed due to factual impossibility.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views1 page

    I. Aberratio Ictus: Week 3 C. Transferred Intent (Art. 4, Par. 1 See Also Art. 49, RPC)

    Uploaded by

    E L E N A
    This document appears to be class notes on the topic of transferred intent in criminal law. It includes: 1) Three types of transferred intent - aberratio ictus (error in aim), error in personae (error in identity of the person), and praeter intentionem (beyond intention). 2) The requirement for concurrence between the intent and the resulting harm for liability, along with discussion of causation. 3) The concept of impossible crimes, where the intent exists but the crime cannot be completed due to factual impossibility.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Week 3 c. Transferred intent (Art.

    4, par. 1; See also Art. 49,


    RPC)

    i. Aberratio ictus  People v. Guillen, L-1477, 18 RAYOS


    January 1950, 85 Phil. 307 CALZITA
     People vs. Flora, G.R. No. PATULOT
    125909, 3 June 2003 SEVILLA

    ii. Error in personae  People v. Sabalones, G.R. No. ARPON


    123485, 31 Aug. 1998, 294 MISA
    SCRA 751 CARDINES

     People vs. Plateros, 83 SCRA PASCUA


    410 (1978) SARABIA
    CUEVA

    iii. Praeter  People vs. Albuquerque, G.R. RAÑOLA


    intentionem No. 38773, 19 Dec. 1933, 59 CANALES
    Phil. 150
     People vs. Ortega, Jr., 276 SEMBRERO
    SCRA 166 (1997) FABI
    MAGALLON

    d. Concurrence; Resulting  Bataclan v. Medina, L-10126, DE VEYRA


    harm; Causation 22 October 1957, 102 Phil. VILLARUEL
    181
     People v. Iligan, G.R. No. AMOR
    75369, 26 November 1990 CHUA
     Urbano v. Intermediate
    Appellate Court, G.R. No. DELA CRUZ
    72964, 7 Jan. 1988 CAÑAS

    C. Impossible Crimes (Art.  Intod v. CA, G.R. No. 103119, GROTHE


    4, Par. 2; See also Article 21 October 1992, 215 SCRA 52 CUANSO
    59, RPC)
     People v. Saladino, L-3634, 30 PARCERO
    May 1951, 89 Phil. 807 DIAZ

     Jacinto v. People, G.R. No. LABAJOY


    162540, 13 July 2009. PABILLON
    SEDURANTE
    * FOR ASYNCHRONOUS
    LEARNING:

    CASE VIDEO
    (uploaded in Canvas)

    You might also like