Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Michael Osorio 11/05/18 Hist 414
Michael Osorio 11/05/18 Hist 414
Michael Osorio 11/05/18 Hist 414
11/05/18
Hist 414
The first article by Christina Larner deals with the sexism against women during
the witch trials. Her main focus is on how men perceived as a threat to thier hegemony
and that anyone that should threaten their position must be a witch. So Christina asks to
what extent was the European witch hunt a response to is perceived threat. She asks
if this witch hunt was a disguised attack on women . She notes that the ratio of males to
females put on trial for witchcraft just added to the theory that this was a sex war. She
then goes into how women also accused other women so this wasn't sexist she
disagrees and argues that there was a failure to recognize the patriarchal structure to
society at the time that divided women. She also dismisses the argument that men
were treated just as bad as women so if they were labeled a witch so it a war against
women she notes that only 20% of men were accused of witchcraft.
The second article by Jane Davidson takes the other side of the argument and
says that there is not enough documented evidence to prove female healers were
accused by men to be witches. She dismisses the idea that doctors accused midwives
in order to keep women in their place. She notes that the midwives being accused as
witches was widespread the evidence suggests the midwives actually consumed was
small. She also notes that there is few documented evidence of female healers being
accused of witchcraft.
The final article by Clive Holmes goes into women accusing other women of
witchcraft and their passive roles as witch trials. Holmes notes the rise of women
witnesses is related to offences against property since the accused had damaged
stock. Holmes also notes that women where in better positions to witness incidents that
(269) He then writes about how women naturally possessed the powers needed to use
witchcraft. Also how villagers paid to be protected from witches and for counter magic.
He notes that women despite their high involvement were passive actors in the legal
process against witches. Then he goes through the different types groups of women
witnesses there where. Overall this article goes into the role of women in accusing
The first article was to biased in my opinion and its tone overpowered the
authors argument. She did give us information supporting her argument but i felt like it
just overshadowed by her word choices. The second article by Davidson was taking
the opposite stance of the first and was also poorly executed .Davidson did not clearly
show us her evidence showing how women were not targeted . She tries to disprove
the conspiracy that doctors of the time wanted to keep women out of medicine and
know thier place. But the evidence given is not convincing enough.Alls of the articles