Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interview Veryimp PDF
Interview Veryimp PDF
The applicant should strive to achieve two basic goals at each institution he visits: first,
to gather information to help determine the merit of a given residency program and
second, to achieve a successful interview such that the selection committee will realize
the merit of the applicant. The time allowed for the latter is limited by protocol; the time
for the former, however, is determined by the applicant and should by no means be
limited to the formal arrangements made in advance by the interview committee.
The applicant should thoroughly familiarize himself with all prepared information such
as brochures, etc. prior to visiting each institution. Before ever leaving home, the
applicant should seek out all faculty and house staff who has had personal experience
with the residency programs in question. These individuals can be excellent sources of
information, since they are in a position to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
a given training program from the same perspective as the applicant. For the same
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 1
reason, the applicant should attempt to meet with any faculty or house staff at each
institution he visits that received some part of their training.
Preparation: It is essential that you have questions to ask the faculty and residents on
your interview in order to make an informed decision. Every interviewer will ask you if
you have any questions. It is okay to ask the same question of different interviewers.
All of the effort in the foregoing discussion is wasted if the applicant fails to make a
favorable impression upon the selection committee of the desired residency program. In
order to achieve a successful interview, it is first important to identify the goals of the
interviewer. Almost universally now, the intense grill session is a thing of the past.
Selection committees now tend to rely on medical school grades, Dean's letters and
letters of recommendation to base their evaluation of each applicant's medical
competence. The purpose of the interview is for the selection committee to identify the
personal characteristics of each applicant, which may determine how he will function as
a house officer. These attributes are not easy to specify, but include interpersonal skills
and abilities to interact with superiors, peers, and subordinates. The interviewer will
need to evaluate how he thinks the applicant will fit in with the existing house staff.
Some of the more skilled interviewers will make an attempt to judge how the applicant
handles pressure and responds to adversity, as this is certainly a valid concern of the
selection committee. Thus it is important not only to identify what the interviewer is
asking, but why he is asking it. Selection committees are seeking integrity and
dependability in their house officers; questions should be answered honestly and
sincerely.
There are certain questions, which an applicant can anticipate and should be prepared
to answer. These include why you have chosen this particular specialty, what your future
plans are, what you consider important in a training program and why you have applied
to this one in particular, how you have done in medical school, what you consider your
personal strong and weak points, and what qualifications you have that set you apart
from your fellow applicants. On the other hand, an applicant should also have some
questions, which he has prepared to ask of the interviewer. Although physicians by
profession should be excellent interviewers, an applicant will inevitably run across
someone who does not know how to conduct a proper interview and will instead leave it
up to the applicant to carry the interaction. In this case, it is the applicant's
responsibility to ask intelligent, appropriate questions to occupy the duration of the
interview. If the staff physician believes he has carried out a good interview, he is very
likely to make a favorable report to the selection committee.
The only vestige of the grill session, which remains popular among some interviewers, is
that of having the applicant present an interesting case. Although even this is
uncommon today, each applicant should probably be prepared to make a brief two to
three minute presentations and to intelligently discuss the patho-physiology and
differential diagnosis of the case presented.
Just as the applicant finds many intangible factors influencing his evaluation of each
residency program, so the interviewer will base his evaluation of each applicant on
perceptions not easily identified. A firm handshake, confident manner, and good eye
contact can go a long way in this respect. It is certainly important that the applicant be
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 2
himself, but he must do so in a way that puts his best foot forward. Thus, the interviewer
will not only be judging what an applicant says, but how he says it as well.
The interview process today in general takes the form of a relaxed, low-pressure
conversation, and can be quite enjoyable to the applicant and interviewer alike. The
prepared applicant who well understands the purpose of the interview process will find
that he can quite favorably affect his chances of being selected for the residency program
of his choice.
The following are examples of frequent questions asked applicants. Though you
shouldn't memorize answers, it would be to your advantage to write out your responses
so that your responses will be fluent and thought-out.
1. Where are your graduates? Where do they come from and where do they go?
2. How have the graduates done on the USMLE Step 3 and specialty boards?
3. How much didactics? Are the resident's relieved of clinical duties to attend?
4. Patient population?
5. Is attendance at national/regional conferences encouraged and funded?
6. Is this program affiliated with a medical school?
7. What teaching responsibilities for medical students are expected of residents?
8. If residents have teaching responsibilities, approximately how much time each week
is spent with students?
9. Is there formal training of residents on how to effectively teach and evaluate
medical students?
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 3
10. Are the clerkship objectives for students shared with the residents?
11. How are residents evaluated?
12. Are there other hospitals used for rotations or electives?
13. What type of attending backup support is available when residents are on call?
14. Are residents assisted in find a job when completed?
15. Do residents have any problems finding jobs?
16. Do residents moonlight?
17. What changes do you see in the program during the next few years?
18. Have any residents left the program recently?
19. What are the program's strengths/program's weaknesses?
20. What do you like most about your training program? In what areas can the
program improve itself?
21. What process do you have for improving the residency? For evaluating rotations?
22. What recent changes has the program undergone? What changes do you foresee?
23. What research opportunities are available? What is the availability of funding for
research? What kind of mentor support is available from the faculty?
24. How well do residents perform on board certification exams?
25. What is the structure of the last year of residency?
26. Does the program offer elective time? Mini-fellowships?
Avoid questions during the interview about call schedules, moonlighting, vacation, and
salaries and benefits, other aspects of the day-to-day operations of the program.
The best sources of information for the prospective house officer are the interns and
residents who make up each training program. For the most part, these people are quite
candid and willing to discuss any aspect of their residency program. It is to these
individuals that the pragmatic questions should be addressed, such as salary; call
schedules, moonlighting, etc. Questions pertaining to the strengths and weaknesses of
the program are also best directed to these people, as some faculties are offended by
such inquiries. Most importantly, the applicant should attempt to determine the general
happiness of the house staff, and whether he would be happy in the same situation. The
applicant should also make observations concerning the esprit de corps and whether he
would fit in well with the existing group of house officers. Most interview schedules allot
at least one hour for the applicant to interact with the current house staff for the
procurement of such information. Often this time is inadequate, however, especially if
the ratio of applicants to house officers is high. A seldom utilized but highly
recommended practice is that of visiting the hospital the evening before the scheduled
interview. If not too busy, the house officers on call are usually more than willing to
discuss their residency program at length, and tend to be more candid in this setting. In
addition, the applicant may have the opportunity to see parts of the hospital and gain
insights into the actual day to day realities of the training program that are not available
to the average interviewee. The importance of the night-before visit and its potential
yield of information cannot be over-emphasized.
General Questions
1. What features of the program do residents like or dislike?
2. How strong are the residents? From where did they graduate?
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 4
Reputation
Education
Work Environment
Salary
1. What is the starting salary for an intern? For an R2?
2. What about the cost of living in the area?
3. Is moonlighting permitted? If so, how does it work around here?
Benefits
1. What health benefits are available?
2. What is the maternity/paternity leave policy?
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 5
3. Is parking provided? Is subsidized housing available? What is the vacation
schedule
Presenting Yourself: Dr. Iverson lists in his book Getting into a Residency, A
Guide for Medical Students, five reasons why interviews fail.
1. Inadequate preparation.
2. Applicant does not listen to the questions being asked.
3. Interviewers may get annoyed by having questions answered that were not asked.
4. Rambling, providing superfluous information.
5. Applicant inadvertently gives warning signals to the interviewer (inconsistent
answers, abrasiveness, evasiveness, blaming others for applicant's problems,
dullness).
The bottom line in the interview is that you have to sell yourself. Key personality traits
sought by interviewers to keep in mind: drive, motivation, communication skills, energy,
determination, confidence, reliability, honesty/integrity, pride, dedication, analytical
skills, listening skills. You can include these "key words" into your personal statement
and in your responses during the interview.
Interview attire: "In your town, your reputation counts; in another, your clothes do."
Talmud, Shabboth. Appropriate dress is an essential part of any interview. Keep in mind
that most interviewers are conservative. Above all, dress neatly. Men: two piece suits in
a solid color (gray, black or navy). Does not need to be expensive, but it should be well-
cult and tailored. If you don't have or cannot afford a suit, wear a navy blue sport jacket
with matching pants. The shirt should be plain white long sleeve with a conservative tie.
Be sure your shoes are well polished. Carry a notepad, preferably in a leather-like
portfolio to take notes. Besides, it looks good.... Women: two piece suit or a well tailored
dress. Simple blouse (watch the neck line...). Shoes should be simple pumps, low heeled
in a dark or neutral color. The less jewelry you wear the better. Carrying a purse is
debatable. Some say to never carry one. If you have an attaché case, place all your stuff
in that as well as a notepad (portfolio style as above). If you can get away with it, just
carry a notepad-it will be easier on you.
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 6
• Pen (a nice one).
• Money-in case you have to pay for parking or lunch.
• Parking ticket to have validated by the secretary.
Program Evaluation
There is no hard data available by which one can evaluate the various training programs
so the applicant must base his decisions on personal observations and word-of mouth
information obtained from the sources discussed above. Because much of this type of
data is subjective, the applicant must attempt to base his conclusions on the largest
possible data base. In each instance, of course, the source of information must be
considered. While it is not mandatory that each intern be overjoyed with his current lot
in life, he should be able to smile and to say positive things concerning his training
program. It is probably a good idea to make an attempt to convert subjective
observations into objective data by means of some scoring system following your visit to
each institution. Each applicant must determine beforehand the aspects of a training
program which are important to him, and then grade on a scale of 1 to 5, for example,
how every program fulfills each of the requirements. If this is not done, it is sometimes
difficult at the end of a long interview trip to recall the positive and negative attributes of
each residency program.
In the final analysis, you will find that your ultimate decision on how to rank the
programs to which you have applied will be based largely on intangible factors. You will
like or dislike the various training programs for reasons that you cannot easily identify.
The more exposure an applicant has to each institution he visits, both in terms of
personal observation and word-of-mouth testimonials, the more likely it will be that his
gut feelings about that training program are accurate.
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 7
Follow-Up
The latest addition to the interview process, which has become popular, recently is that
of the follow-up letter. Type follow-up letters promptly after interviewing, thanking the
program director for the opportunity to interview and for any lodging and meals they
provided. Be sure to mention the interviewers and the residents by name in your letter.
Also, at this time or definitely after the match, write a letter to those faculty members
who wrote your letters of recommendation thanking them and informing them of your
match. Of less certain propriety is the practice by which applicants inform their most
favored residency programs of their ranking intentions, as many selection committees
view this with distrust. The effect of such a letter on one's chances of being selected are
questionable, and in any case such letters would be appropriate only for the institutions
at the top of one's ranking order.
If one thing should be added to the foregoing discussion, it is that the entire interview
process should be initiated as early as possible. Requests for prepared information from
each program can be sent as early as June, and requests for letters of recommendation
should be made in August. If one plans on interviewing during the month of November,
the residency program should receive applications in late August or early September, so
that the interview date of choice can be arranged. The selection committee as
responsible views the applicant who makes his plans well in advance, prepared
individual who is certain of his goals and how to achieve them.
Good Luck!!
Raj
© http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/residencyhunt/ 8