Date 07.04.

2020
 ICCR -ICCPR
 Implementation Aspect of ICCPR ICSER
 How Indian Judiciary have been dealing with this covenant, and how this covenant has
nexus with Indian constitution.
 Part 3 of Indian Constitution ICCPR, do relate Article 23 of Indian Constitution and Article
9 of ICCPR.
 Article 14 of ICCPR same to Article 14 of Indian Constitution
 Right to privacy Article 21 and Article 17 ICCPR no one should be unreasonable interfere
by ant authority with right to privacy
 Kharak Singh v state of up first time in India Right to Privacy was discussed-visit by
police to kharak house-Judiciary cited article 17 of ICCPR
 Another landmark case related to Article 17-PUCL V UOI-also known as PHONE TAPPING
CASE -PHONE COVERSATION IS ALSO CAME WITHIN THE SCOPE OF ARTICLE 21-TAPING
OF HIGH RANKING OFFICAL.IT ALSO FALLS UNDER ATICLE 21 CONCEPT OF PRIVACY.
INDIA HAS RATIFIED THAT COVENANT AND JUDUCIARY Stated THAT RIGHT TO PRIVACY
HAS TO BE Developed ACCORDING TO COVENENAT AND INDIA SHOULD ALSO FULFILS
INTERNATIONAL DUTY.
 MR XV MR Z SUFFERING FROMAIDS AND DR. TOLD THAT To FAMILY GROUND OF
BREACH OF CONFIDENTIALITY.EVEN THOUGH THERE IS RIGHT TO PRIVACY.EVEN THAT
RIGHT IS NOT ABSOLUTE BECAUSE IT WAS In LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST.THEY DIDN’T
DISCLOSE WORLD AT LARGE.IF THEY DIDN’T THEY CAN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH
 CHART showing how Indian Constitution is related to iccpr icser case law at least
 2,3 case law Indian case how Indian cases related to iccpr.
 Right to speedy trial under Indian Constitution And ICCPR-Article 9 para 3 of iccpr clearly
lays down .any one arrested shall be bring before judge entitled to trial.
 Husainaira khatoon v secretary of state of Bihar inhumane condition of arrested person
article 21 of Indian constitution right to speedy trial. Article 9 para3 we can clearly
interpretate under article 9 article 21 right to speedy trial.
 Kadia v state of bihar-In this case ,similar to husianara khatoon case
4 person confined in pakud jail. in santhal paragna a detained for 8year without any trial
.without trial languishing in jail for 8 year.it is shame on adjudicatory system, what can be more
shame oon judiciary we ratified ICPR .India has to respected international obligation despite
that no one looked on their condition not informed of their right. Proper legal aid. Nothing of
this sort was done. In this judiciary take help icpr and for emancipation of
Legal aid clinic state legal aid clinic.-Article 39 a of Indian Constitution - Article 14 para 3b legal
aid of ICPR
To legal aid entitled to tried present his case.…
By which amendment article 39 a added by which amendment 42nd amendment 1976 free legal
aid was introduced
1st case mh hoscoat v state of Maharashtra.. 1978 here the again assist of para3b we also
ratified iccpr and we also have 39 b..it is obligatory on india to provide legal aid to people of
country 14 para 3b article 21 and 39 b