Professional Documents
Culture Documents
24.E: Chemistry of Coordination Chemistry (Exercises)
24.E: Chemistry of Coordination Chemistry (Exercises)
S24.3.1
a. triamminetrichlorocobalt(III)
b. triamminetrinitrito-O-cobalt(III); or triamminetrinitritocobalt(III)
c. diaquadioxalatoferrate(III) ion
d. silver(I) tetraiodomercurate(II)
24.4: Isomerization
S24.5.1
A24.5.1
1. The O atom has 2s22p4 as the electron configuration. Therefore, O has 2 unpaired electrons. It is paramagnetic
2. The Br atom has 4s23d104p5 as the electron configuration. Therefore, Br has 1 unpaired electron. It is paramagnetic.
3. The B atom has 2s22p1 as the electron configuration. Because it has one unpaired electron, it is paramagnetic.
4. The F- ion has 2s22p6 has the electron configuration. Because it has no unpaired electrons, it is diamagnetic.
5. The Fe2+ ion has 3d6 has the electron configuration. Because it has 4 unpaired electrons, it is paramagnetic.
Q24.6.3
Will the value of Δo increase or decrease if I− ligands are replaced by NO2− ligands? Why?
S24.6.3
The value of Δo would increase because NO2− is a stronger ligand which means that it would have a larger
split.
Review oxidation state for more details.
Q24.6.4
For an octahedral complex of a metal ion with a d6 configuration, what factors favor a high-spin configuration versus a low-
spin configuration?
Q24.6.5
How can CFT explain the color of a transition-metal complex?
The color of a complex is determined by the wavelength it absorbed. For example, if a complex absorb red light, it shows
green.
How is the wavelength determined?
It related to the structure of a complex. Based on CFT, if a complex has strong ligand field, it is low spin, which means the
energy gap between each orbitals are high. The energy gap between orbitals relates to the wavelength of the complex
absorbed: E = lamda * h
Stronger the energy, shorter the wavelength absorbed, and the color maybe shows more red and orange-ish.
Q24.6.6
Do strong-field ligands favor a tetrahedral or a square planar structure? Why?
Q24.6.7
For each complex, predict its structure, whether it is high spin or low spin, and the number of unpaired electrons present.
A24.6.7
a. There are 6 ligands bonded to the central atom, so the complex is octahedral.
Since the complex has a negative 3 charge and the oxidation number of Cl is -1, Cl6 gives the complex a -6 charge and Ti must
be +3 for the complex to be -3 in total.
Ti is the second transition metal in the first row of transition metals (atomic number 22). Ti3+ has the electron configuration of
[Ar] d1 which means that there is one electron in the d orbital. It it unpaired (since there are no other electrons).
Since Cl is pretty low in the Spectrochemical Series, it is a high energy ligand that would cause the complex to be high spin.
However, since there is only one electron, whether it is high or low spin does not affect the number of paired/unpaired
electrons.
To see how the electron configuration would be for octahedral complexes, go to
http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/ob...1/blb2405.html and scroll down to Electron Configurations in Octahedral
Complexes
b. There are 4 ligand bonded to the central atom, so the complex is either tetrahedral or square planar. In this case, it is
tetrahedral. Since the overall charge is -2, and 4 Cl's give a -4 charge, Co's charge must be +2.
Q24.6.8
a. d9, square planar, neither high nor low spin, single unpaired electron
First, we must determine the location of each of the ligands on the spectrochemical series. We can see that NH3 is slightly
lower than CN, which is the greatest of the series. Since NH3 is only slighly lower but past the point that classifies is as a
strong field, it is neither high or spin.
We then must verify the charge of Cu in the complex. Through calculations we come to the result that Cu=2+. In it's row,
Cu is #11 so we subrtract 11-2=9. This tells us that the complex is a d^9 and square planar according the the 4 subscript.
CN is highest on the spectrochemical series and therefore has a strong field, low spin, and large delta.
Q24.6.9
The ionic radii of V2+, Fe2+, and Zn2+ are all roughly the same (approximately 76 pm). Given their positions in the periodic
table, explain why their ionic radii are so similar.
S24.6.9
As we can see from the periodic table, all the mentioned metals, V, Fe, and Zn, are present in the 4th period in the periodic
table. All these metals are 3d elements since electrons fill their 3d orbitals. As for the ionic radii, the similar ionic radii is due
to the shielding effect, which is when the valence electrons are "shielded" from the attraction towards the nucleus. The atomic
radii trend in the periodic table is that atomic radii decreases from left to right, but in the case of 3d elements, as we move
from left to right, elements are added to the inner 3d orbital, thus pushing the outer 4s orbital. This explains why the atomic
radii or ionic radii of these ions are so similar.