Bar – Boljare Highway,

Section Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo

Bridge / Most Suvovara
Expert’s Witness Report on Unforeseeable
Physical Condition - Cavern under the Sub-
Clauses 4.12 and 13.9 / Stručni nalaz o
nepredvidivim fizičkim uslovima – kaverni
prema potklauzulama 4.12 i 13.9

August 2020
Rev00
Supervision of Design and Works
Nadzor nad Projektovanjem i Izgradnjom
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

Document Control Sheet

Client: Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs

Project: Supervision of Design and Works on the Bar - – Boljare Highway

Section Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo

Title: Suvovara Bridge Expert’s Witness Report on Unforeseeable Physical Condition -

Cavern under the Sub-Clauses 4.12 and 13.9 – Rev01 August 2020 / Most Suvovara -
Stručni nalaz o nepredvidivim fizičkim uslovima – kaverni, prema potklauzulama 4.12 i
13.9 – Rev01

Revision History

Prepared by Checked by Approved by

ORIGINAL Darko Muza Jan Lorange Jan Lorange

SIGNATURE

DATE 15 August 2020 15 August 2020 15 August 2020

1
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

LIST OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION / UVOD................................................................................................................................3
2. CLAIM EVENT / DOGAĐAJ POTRAŽIVANJA.......................................................................................... 3
2.1. CLAIM EVENT NO. 054 / DOGAĐAJ POTRAŽIVANJA BR 054.............................................................. 3
2.2. CLAIM EVENT NO. 054-2 / DOGAĐAJ POTRAŽIVANJA BR 054-2 .................................................... 13
3. TECHNICAL REVIEW OF CONTRACTOR’S DOCUMENTATION / TEHNIČKI PREGLED
DOKUMENTACIJE IZVOĐAČA RADOVA .................................................................................................. 19
3.1. GENERAL COMMENTS / OPŠTI KOMENTARI....................................................................................... 19
3.2. TECHNICAL COMMENTS / TEHNIČKI KOMENTARI............................................................................ 19
3.3. TECHNICAL CONCLUSION / TEHNIČKI ZAKLJUČAK......................................................................... 22
4. GENERAL DESCRIPTION / OPŠTI OPIS...................................................................................................23
5. PRELIMINARY DESIGN / IDEJNI PROJEKAT....................................................................................... 24
6. CONCLUSION ON PRELIMINARY DESIGN / ZAKLJUČAK O IDEJNOM PROJEKTU................ 29
7. CONTRACTOR’S CLAIM ANALIZY / ANALIZA POTRAŽIVANJA IZVOĐAČA RADOVA..........30
8. FINAL CONCLUSION / KONAČAN ZAKLJUČAK................................................................................. 31

2

1. INTRODUCTION
Due to Contractor's claims for unforeseeable
geological conditions in occasions of caverns
observed during foundation pit excavation,
herewith the Engineer is providing our expert
witness opinion below. This particular Report
shows our opinion on the Contractor's Claim No.
054 & 054/2, described in chapter 2. of this
Report; and related to Suvovara bridge.
2. CLAIM EVENTS No. 054 and 054/2
Herewith, please find bellow description of the
Claim Event as follow:
 2.1 Claim Event No. 054
Foundation pits S2 L, S4 L and S5 L were
excavated at the designed elevation. Due to the
fact that no geotechnical environment suitable
for shallow foundation geotechnical category D
was found in parts of the foundation pits, the
Contractor asked the Designer to check the type
of foundation in accordance with the actual
existing geotechnical environment. Also,
prospective drilling was performed in order to
confirm the actual geotechnical environment of
the foundation soil, and based on the obtained
results and in accordance with the Designers'
Statements, parts of poorer rock mass were
removed from the bottom of the foundation pit
to the required geotechnical environment, and
these are gradually filled with MB30 concrete.
In Contractor’s filly detailed Claim No. 054;
in the chapter The Events giving rise to Claim
(Factual-Matter Analysis); Background, it is
stated: “ On construction site of Subsection 3.1,
the Contractor encounter a change in the
geological conditions at the bridge #6 Suvovara
at the bottom of the foundation of piers P2L,
P4L and P5L.
The Contractor consider this adverse physical
conditions to have been Unforeseeable,
therefore in accordance with SC 4.12 of the
Design and Built Contract for Bar – Boljare
Highway, the Contractor informed the Engineer
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
1. UVOD
Zbog Izvođačevih potraživanja za nepredvidive
geološke uslove u slučaju kaverni uočenih
tokom iskopa temeljne jame, Inženjer dostavlja
svoje stručno mišljenje kako slijedi. U ovom
konkretnom Izvještaju dajemo mišljenje o
Izvođačevom potraživanju br. 054 i 054/2, koje
je opisano u poglavlju 2. ovog Izvještaja; i
odnosi se na most Suvovara.
2. DOGAĐAJI POTRAŽIVANJA br. 054 i
054/2
U nastavku dajemo opis događaja potraživanja:
 2.1 Događaj Potraživanja br. 054

 Temeljne jame S2 L, S4 L i S5 L iskopane su
na projektovanoj koti. Uslijed činjenice da u
dijelovima temeljnih jama nije nađena
geotehnička sredina pogodna za plitko
fundiranje geotehnička kategorija D, Izvođač je
zatražio od Projektanta provjeru tipa fundiranja
u skladu sa stvarnom zatečenom geotehničkom
sredinom. Takođe, izvedena su prospekcijska
bušenja u svrhu potvrđivanja stvarne
geotehničke sredine temeljnog tla, a na osnovu
dobivenih rezultata i sukladno Izjavama
Projektanata sa dna temeljnih jama uklonjeni su
dijelovi lošije stijenske mase do zahtjevane
geotehničke sredine, te su iste stepenasto
zapunjene betonom marke MB30.

U priloženom Izvođačevom detaljnom
Potraživanju br. 054; u poglavlju Događaji
koji su doveli do potraživanja (Analiza
činjenićnog stanja); Pozadina, navedeno je
slijedeće: “Na gradilištu podsekcije 3.1 Izvođač
se susreo sa promjenom geoloških uslova na
mostu br. 6 Suvovara, temelji stubova S2L, S4L
i S5L.
Izvođač smatra da su ovi nepovoljni fizički
uslovi Nepredvidivi, stoga u skladu sa PK 4.12
Ugovora o projektovanju i izgradnji autoputa
Bar – Boljare, Izvođač je obavijestio Inženjera
dopisom RB-BBH/4737/CD-P3 datiranim
30.11.2017. godine (Prilog 2) da smo se susreli
3

that we encountered unforeseeable physical
conditions on the construction site via letter RB-
BBH/4737/CD-P3 dated on 30.11.2017
(Enclosure 2).
Having in mind that this changed geological
conditions led to a variation to the scope of
Works, therefore pursuant to Sub-clause 13.9
Unforeseeable Works, the Contractor asked the
Engineer to apply the required Variation
procedure in accordance to Contract Sub-
clauses 13.1 and 13.3.
The above mentioned Unforeseeable Physical
Conditions are all recorded in the following
documents:
Statement regarding foundation conditions
(Enclosure 4)
However, the Engineer rejected Contractor’s
request via its letter IG/5659/VM dated on
04.12.2017 (Enclosure 3) on the bases that the
geological conditions reported by the
Contractor are undoubtedly not unforeseeable
works under Sub-clause 13.9.
The Contractor disagrees with this opinion and
submitted a notice of claim for time and cost via
its letter RB-BBH/4911/CD-P3 dated on
14.12.2017.
In the chapter Cost (Damage) Analyses the
Contractor states as follow:
“Due to the allocation of additional resources,
in order to complete Unforeseeable works, the
Contractor is entitled to the following costs:
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
sa nepredvidivim fizičkim uslovima na
gradilištu.
Imajući u vidu da su svi ovi promjenjeni
geološki uslovi doveli do varijacije obima
radova, stoga je u skladu sa Podklauzulom 13.9
Nepredvidivi radovi. Izvođač je zatražio od
Inženjera da primjeni neophodnu Proceduru o
varijaciji u skladu sa Podklauzulama 13.1 i
13.3 Ugovora.
Gorenavedeni Nepredvidivi fizički uslovi su
evidentirani u slijedećim dokumentima:
Mišljenje u vezi uslova temeljenja (Prilog 4)
Međutim, Inženjer je odbio zahtjev Izvođača
putem dopisa IG/5659/VM datiranog
14.12.2017. godine (prilog 3), smatrajući da
geološki uslovi koje je konstatovao Izvođač bez
sumnje ne predstavljaju nepredvidive radove u
skladu sa Podklauzulom 13.9
Izvođač se ne slaže s ovim mišljenjem i podnio
je Obaviještenje o potraživanju za vrijeme i
troškove preko svog dopisa RB-BBH/4911/CD-
P3 datiranog 14.12.2017 godine.“
U poglavlju Analiza troškova (Štete) Izvođač
navodi slijedeće:
„Za raspoređivanja dodatnih sredstava za
kompletiranje Nepredvidljivih radova, Izvođač
ima pravo na sledeće troškove:
4
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

No. Position Item Quantity Unit price Amount

1 S2L Additional excavation 37,924 20,55 779,34

2 Additional concrete 37,924 246,60 9.352,06
3 S4L Additional excavation 20,424 20,55 419,71
4 Additional concrete 20,424 246,60 5.036,56
5 S5L Additional excavation 130,424 20,55 2.680,21
6 Additional concrete 130,424 246,60 32.162,56
7 Management cost 10% 5.043,04
TOTAL AMOUNT 55.473,48

Contractor also attached Opinion about Izvođač je takođe priložio Mišljenje u vezi
foundation conditions, and below are the uslova temeljenja, a u nastavko donosimo
statements from the Geological Reports on the navode iz Geoloških izvještaja o kartiranju
mapping of foundation pits, as well as their temeljnih jama, kao i njihove anekse, kako
annexes, as follows: slijedi:
Foundation pit S2 L
In related Geological Report, Geologist in charge Temeljna jama S2L
states as follows:
U vezanom Geološkom izvještaju, odgovorni
“By geological mapping of foundation pit of pier Geolog Izvođača navodi slijedeće:
S2 L, it has been found that the lithological
„Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnog iskopa stuba
composition and engineering-geological
S2 L utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i
characteristics correspond to the present in the
inženjersko-geološke karakteristike odgovaraju
Geotechnics Design for bridge Suvovara.
napisanom u Geotehničkom elaboratu za most
Excavation was done mechanically and mining,
Suvovara. Iskop je rađen mašinski sve do
mechanical excavation of floor feet height of 2,4
dubine od 2,4 m....
m…
Dno temeljne jame uglavnom izgrađuju
Bottom of foundation pit is mostly build of fine
sitnozrni pješčari sa kalcitnim žicama i manjim
sandstones with calcite wires and smaller
proslojcima alevrolita 2cIG2(abc)1,sa izuzetkom
interbeds of alevrolite 2cIG2(abc)1,with the
istočne kosine, gdje preovlađuju prašinaste
exception oof the eastern slope where dominate
gline i pjeskovito-glinovite prašine sa
powder clay and sandy-clay powder with
sadržajem šljunkovite komponente koje
contains gravel component which intake 1,5 to
zahvataju i 1,5 do 2,0 m temeljnog dna...
2,0 of foundation bottom…
It is noticed smaller tectonical activity followed
by appearance of joints. Zapaža se manja tektonska aktivnost koju prate
pojave pukotina.
Six prospecting studied boreholes were drilled,
which determinated the geological structure of Urađeno je 6 prospekcijskih bušotina, kojima je
5

the terrain bellow the bottom of foundation of
pier S2 L. The drilling results showed favourable
engineering-geological characteristics of the
foundation site at the very bottom of the
foundation, excluding the zone around the drill
hole B-1 and B-2, which was build from a worse
rock mass.
Due to the characteristic of the rock mass that is
represented on the eastern side of the slope and
the bottom of the foundation pit, it is
neededadditional Designer’s opinion for the
condition of the foundation of pier S2 L.”
In the Annex to the same Geological Report, the
responsible Geologist states:
“After completion of the excavation and the
completed prospective boreholes in the
foundation pit of the pier S2 L, due to a poor
engineering-geological conditions in the part of
the foundation pit of funding of pier, the
Designer’s opinion on the method of pier
foundation was requested.
Following the recommendation of the
Responsible Designers for the bridge Suvovara,
whose statement is attached as an annex, the
bottom of the eastern part of the foundation pit
of pier S2 L was cleaned to the solid rock mass.
After cleaning the foundation pit, a replacement
of the material was made with concrete MB 30
to the level of the foundation.”
In attached Opinion Regarding Foundation
Conditions at Pier S2 L on Suvovara Bridge
at Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo, authors
Kenan Imširpašić and Enes Lakota – bridge
Designers for Suvovara bridge it states:
“By email dated on 25 August 2017 You have
submitted to us Report About Engineering-
Geological Mapping at Foundation Pit S2-L at
Suvovara Bridge and asked for opinion.
We have reviewed mentioned Report as well as
bedding stresses for foundation S2-L.
According to our opinion there are good
conditions for foundation. Exception is only
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
utvrđena geološka građa terena ispod
temeljnog dna stuba S2 L. Rezultati bušotina
pokazali su povoljne inženjersko-geološke
karakteristike terena za fundiranje u samom
dnu temelja, izuzimajući zonu oko bušotina B-1
i B-2, koja je izgrađena od lošije stijenske
mase.
Zbog karakteristika stijenske mase koja je
zastupljena na istočnoj strani kosine i podnom
dijelu temeljne jame potrebno je dodatno
mišljenje Projektanta za uslove fundiranja
stuba S2 L.“
U Aneksu istog Geološkog izvještaja odgovorni
Geolog navodi:
„Nakon završetka iskopa i urađenih
prospekcijskih bušotina u temeljnoj jami stuba
S2 L, a zbog lošijih inženjersko-geoloških
uslova fundiranja stuba u jednom dijelu
temeljne jame, zatraženo je mišljenje
Projektanta o načinu fundiranja stuba.
Po preporuci odgovornih Projektanata za most
Suvovara, čiju izjavu prilažemo kao prilog uz
ovaj aneks, izvršeno je čišćenje dna stuba S2 L
u istočnom dijelu do čvrste stijenske mase.
Nakon čišćenja temeljne jame izvršena je
zamjena materijala sa betonom MB 30 do kote
fundiranja.“
U priloženom Mišljenju u vezi uslova
temeljenja stubova S2 L mosta Suvovara
autoputa Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo,
autora Kenana Imširpašića i Enesa Lakote –
Projektanata mosta Suvovara navedeno je:
„Putem elektronske pošte ste nam 25. avgusta
2017 dostavili Izvještaj o inženjersko-
geološkom kartiranju temeljne jame stuba S2-L
mosta Suvovara, te zatražili mišljenje.
Pogledali smo pomenuti izvještaj, kao i
naprezanja temeljne stope S2-L.
Prema našem mišljenju radi se o povoljnim
uslovima za temeljenje. Izuzetak je jedino
6

eastern part of construction pit.
Considering that foundation pit is dry and
stable, where risk of loss stability is not
registered, we suggest keeping foundation of
pier S2-L with position and dimensiones as in
Main Design, with construction of replacement
materials on eastern part of pit.
Weaker materials could be replaced with
blinding concrete, or thicker layers with spar
concrete.”
The Annex is accompanied by a Statement on
the geotechnical conditions for the foundation
of the S2L, S4L and S5L piers of the
Suvovara Bridge, authored by the responsible
Designer Peng Tingjia and geologist Saša Cupać,
which states:
“After the excavation of foundation pitsfor piers
S2L, S4L and S5L was finished, we received
letter from Subcontractor, company Bemax,
which were sent to the Main Contractor. In
letter, opinion of designers Mr Kenan Imširpašić
and Mr Enes Lakota was submitted. The Reports
of engineering-geological mapping foundation
pits, done by geology engineer Radovan
Čvorović, were also submitted. After the insight
into this letter, we make the following
conclusion.
By geological mapping of foundation pits of all
piers, it has been found that the lithological
composition and EG characteristics correspond
to the Geotechnical Report for Suvovara bridge.
Pier S2L
Bottom of the foundation pit is mostly built of
fine grain sandstone with calcite wires and
smaller interbeds of alevrolite2cIG2(abc)1 of
geotechnical category D, with the exception of
the eastern slope where silty clay and sandy clay
silt dominate, with content of gravel component
which intake 1,5 to 2 meter soft foundation
bottom. Excavation is stabile, there is no
occurrence of underground water. Six
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
istočna strana temeljne jame.
S obzirom da je temeljna jama suha i stabilna,
te da nije registrovana opasnost od gubitka
stabilnosti, predlažemo zadržavanje temeljne
stope S2-L sa položajem i dimenzijama prema
Glavnom projektu, uz izradu zamjenskog
materijala do geološki povoljnih slojeva ispod
istočnog dijela stope.
Zamjena lošeg materijala se može vršiti sa
podložnim betonom ili na većim dubinama špar
betonom.“
U nastavku Aneksa priložena je Izjava o
geotehničkim uslovima fundiranja stubova
S2L, S4L i S5L mosta Suvovara, autora
odgovornog Projektanta Peng Tingjia i geologa
Saše Cupaća, u kojoj je navedeno:
„Nakon završetka temeljnih jama za stubove
S2L, S4L i S5L, dobili smo dopis podizvođača
preduzeća Bemax koji su upućeni Glavnom
Izvođaču. U dopisima je priloženo mišljenje
Projektanatavg-dina Kenana Imširpašića i g-
dina Enesa Lakote. Takođe, dostavljeni su nam
Izvještaji o inženjersko-geološkom kartiranju
temeljnih iskopa koje je izradio inženjer
geologije Radovan Čvorović. Nakon uvida u
dostavljenu dokumentaciju konstatovano je
slijedeće:
Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnih iskopa svih
stubova utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i IG
karakteristike odgovaraju Geotehničkom
elaboratu za most Suvovara.
Stub S2L
Dno temeljne jame uglavnom izgrađuju
sitnozrni pješčari sa kalcitnim žicama i manjim
proslojcima alevrolita 2cIG 2(abc)1 geotehničke
kategorije D, sa izuzetkom istočne kosine, gdje
preovlađuju prašinaste gline i pjeskovito-
glinovite prašine sa sadržajem šljunkovite
komponente koje zahvataju i 1,5 do 2,0 m
temeljnog dna. Iskop je stabilan i nema pojave
podzemnih voda. Urađeno je 6 prospekcijskih
7

prospecting studied boreholes were drilled,
which determinated the geological structure of
the terrain bellow the foundation bottom. The
drilling results showed unfavourable rock mass
in a smaller part of foundation bottom
(boreholes B1 and B2).
Pier S4L
Bottom of foundation pit is built from flysch
sediments represented by sandy limestones,
marls, sandstone and alevrolites. Excavation is
stable, there is no occurence of underground
water. Nine prospective boreholes were drilled.
Drilling results showed unfavourable rock mass
in a smaller part of foundation bottom in the
area of the borehole B5, due to which four
additional boreholes were done in order to
determinate a distribution zone. The rest of the
foundation bottom is built from flysch sediments
of geotechnical category D.
Pier S5L
Terrain under the foundation pier is dominantly
built from heterogenious dilluvial material,
mostly sandy-silty clay with large sandstone,
marly limestone and alevrolite particles. The
western slope is built from marly limestone.
Excavation is stable, there is no occurence of
underground water. Six prospective boreholes
were performed bellow the foundation bottom.
Results showed that in the western part of
foundation pit, rock mass with geotechnical
category D is located at 1 m and in the eastern
part at -3,5 m deep from the foundation bottom.
Due to the unfourable EG characteristics of the
rock mass in foundation pits, the Contractor
asked additional Designer's opinion for the
conditions for foundations of piers.
1. It is necessary to replace material bellow
foundation level of Suvovara bridge piers
S2L, S4L and S5L, where soil and weak rock
mass are identify by prospective boreholes.
Replacement shall be made untill the
appearance of the favourable rock mass of
geotechnical category D. Foundation
bottoms should be stepped after replacement.
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
bušotina ispod temeljnog dna stuba. Rezultati
su pokazali da je manji dio temeljnog dna
(prospekcijske bušotine B1 i B2)izgrađen od
lošije stijenske mase.
Stub S4L
Dno temeljne jame izgrađuju flišni sedimenti
predstavljeni pjeskovitim krečnjacima,
laporcima, pješčarima i alevrolitima. Iskop je
stabilan i nema pojave podzemnih voda.
Urađeno je 9 prospekcijskih bušotina ispod
temeljnog dna stuba. Rezultati su pokazali da je
manja zona oko bušotine B5 izgrađena od
lošije stijenske mase, zbog čega su izvedene 4
dodatne bušotine (B6, B7, B8 i B9), kako bi se
odredilo njeno rasprostiranje. Ostali dio dna
temelja je izgrađen od flišnih sedimenata
kategorije D.
Stub S5L
Teren ispod temelja stuba većim dijelom
izgrađuje deluvijum heterogenog sastava;
dominira pjeskovito prašinasta glina sa
krupnim odlomcima pješčara, laporovitog
krečnjaka i alevrolita. Zapadnu kosinu grade
laporoviti krečnjaci. Iskop je stabilan, nema
pojave podzemne vode. Urađeno je 6
prospekcijskih bušotina ispod temeljnog dna
stuba. Rezultati su pokazali da se u zapadnom
dijelu stijenska masa geotehničke kategorije D
nalazi na dubini od 1 m, a u istočnom dijelu na
dubini od 3,5 m od dna temeljne jame.
Zbog nepovoljnih IG karakteristika stijenske
mase u temeljnim iskopima, zatraženo je od
strane Izvođača dodatno mišljenje Projektanta
za uslove fundiranja stubova.
1. Potrebno je izvršiti zamjenu materijala
ispod kote fundiranja temelja stubova S2L,
S4L i S5L mosta Suvovara, gdje je
prospekcijskim bušotinama konstatovano
tlo i loša stijenska masa. Zamjenu tla
izvršiti do pojave povoljne stijenske mase
geotehničke kategorije D. Dno temeljnih
8

2. Based on information from the terrain and
annexes of geological mapping reports, as
well as consultations with the Engineer and
the Contractor. Contractor is required after
remooving unfavourable material to fill
foundation pit with concrete MB30, or in
deeper layers with concrete MB30 combined
with crushed solid limestone (spar concrete).
Filling shall be performed up to the
foundation level. Afterwards, it can be
continued with next stages of foundation
construction,
Foundation pit S4L
In the related Geological Report, the responsible
Contractor's Geologist states the following:
„By geological mapping of foundation pit of pier
S4L, it has been found that the lithological
composition and engineering-geological
characteristics correspond to the present in the
Geotechnical Design for bridge Suvovara.
Excavation was done mechanically and mining,
mechanical excavation of floor feet height of 2,4
m...
Bottom of foundation pit construct flysch
sediments represented by sandy limestones,
marls, sandstones and alevrolites. Sandy
limestones are lightly gray, plating to layered
structure, with a thickness of 5-10 cm...Zones
present in the easern part was built from the
rock mass of the worse physical-mechanical
characteristics that need to be cleaned and to
replace the substrate with the blinding layer of
concrete MB30.
It is noticed smaller tectonic activity followed by
appearance of joints.
9 prospective boreholes were drilled, which
determined the geological structure of the
terrain, showed a favourable conditions for the
foundation of the bottom of the pier S4L.
Excluding the narrow zone arround the B5
borehole, which was built from the worse rock
mass, due to which additional boreholes were
made (B6, B7, B8, B9), to determine a
propagation zone. The foundation of the bottom
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
iskopa nakon zamjene treba formirati
stepenasto.
2. Na osnovu informacija sa terena, uvidu u
anekse geoloških izvještaja o kartiranju,
kao i konsultacija sa Nadzorom i
Izvođačem, od Izvođača se traži da nakon
što je uklonio loš materijal, zapuni temeljni
iskop betonom marke MB30, ili na većim
dubinama betonom MB30 u kombinaciji sa
lomljenim kamenom od svježe krečnjačke
stijene (špar beton). Zapunjavanje izvesti
do kote fundiranja. Nakon toga, može da se
nastavi sa slijedećim fazama izgradnje
temelja.“
Temeljna jama S4L
U vezanom Geološkom izvještaju, odgovorni
Geolog Izvođača navodi slijedeće:
„Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnog iskopa stuba
S4 L utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i
inženjersko-geološke karakteristike odgovaraju
napisanom u Geotehničkom elaboratu za most
Suvovara. Iskop je rađen mašinski sve do
dubine od 2,4 m....
Dno temeljne jame izgrađuju flišni sedimenti
predstavljeni pjeskovitim krečnjacima,
laporcima, pješčarima i alevrolitima. Pjeskoviti
krečnjaci su svjetlo sive boje, pločaste do
slojevite strukture, sa debljinom slojeva od 5 do
10 cm...U istočnom dijelu prisutna je zona
izgrađena od stijenske mase lošijih fizičko-
mehaničkih karakteristika, koju je potrebno
iščistiti i izvršiti zamjenu materijala sa
podložnim betonom marke MB30.
Zapaža se manja tektonska aktivnost koju prate
pojave pukotina.
Urađeno je 9 prospekcijskih bušotina kojima je
utvrđena geološka građa terena, što je
pokazalo povoljne uslove za fundiranje stuba
S4L, izuzimajući usku zonu oko bušotine B5,
koja je izgrađena od lošije stijenske mase, zbog
čega su i urađene dodatne bušotine (B6, B7,
B9, B9), kako bi se utvrdilanjena zona
9

of the pier S4L will be carried out on flysch
sediments in geotechnical environment D, as
what is shown in the Geotechnical Elaborate for
bridge Suvovara.
Both Designer's Statements attached to
foundation pit S2 L are also apply to the
foundation pit S4 L
Foundation pit S5 L
In the related Geological Report, the responsible
Contractor's Geologist states the following:
„By geological mapping of foundation pit of pier
S5L, it has been found that the lithological
composition and engineering-geological
characteristics correspond to the present in the
Geotechnical Design for bridge Suvovara.
Excavation was done mechanically and mining,
mechanical excavation of floor feet height of 1,4
m...
Terrain under the foundation pit of pier S5L
dominantly construct river drift heterogenious
lithological composition mostly dominated
sandy-powder clays with large sections of
sandstones, marly limestone and alevrolites.
West slope is represented by marly limestones
Ep 90/46...
It is noticed smaller tectonic activity followed by
appearance of joints.
Six prospective boreholes were drilled, which
determined the geological structure of the
terrain below the bottom of foundation of tpier
S5L. In the western part of the foundation pit
hard rock mass is located at a depth of 1,o m
from the bottom of the foundation pit, and at the
east part at a depth ≈ 3,5 m.
Due to the characteristics of the rock mass that
is represented at the designed depth it is needed
additional Designer's opinion for the conditions
of foundation of pier S5 L.
In the Annex to the same Geological Report, the
responsible Geologist states:
“After the completion of the excavation and the
completed prospecting boreholes in the
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
prostiranja.
Fundiranje dna temelja stuba S4L će se izvoditi
na flišnim sedimentima, u geotehničkoj sredini
D, kao što je prikazano u Geotehničkom
elaboratu za most Suvovara.
Obije Izjave Projektanta priložene uz temeljnu
jamu S2 L odnose se i na temeljnu jamu S4 L
Temeljna jama S5 L
U vezanom Geološkom izvještaju, odgovorni
Geolog Izvođača navodi slijedeće:
„Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnog iskopa stuba
S5L utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i
inženjersko-geološke karakteristike odgovaraju
napisanom u Geotehničkom elaboratu za most
Suvovara. Iskop je rađen mašinski sve do
dubine od 1,4m...
Teren ispod temelja stuba S5L velikim dijelom
izgrađuje deluvijum heterogenog litološkog
sastava, uglavnom dominira pjeskovito
prašinasta glina sa krupnijim odlomcima
pješčara, laporovitog krečnjaka i alevrolita. Na
zapadnoj kosini zastupljeni su laporoviti
krečnjaci Ep 90/46...
Zapaža se manja tektonska aktivnost koju prate
pojave pukotina.
Urađeno je 6 prospekcijskih bušotina kojima je
utvrđena geološka građa terena ispod
temeljnog stuba S5L., U zapadnom dijelu
temeljne jame čvrsta stijenska masa nalazi se
na dubini od 1,0 m od dna temeljne jame, a u
istočnom dijelu na dubini od ≈ 3,5 m.
Zbog karakteristika stijenske mase koja je
zastupljena na projektovanoj dubini potrebno
je dodatno mišljenje Projektanta za uslove
10

foundation pit of the pier S5 L, due to a poor
engineering-geological conditions in the part of
the foundation pit of funding of pier, the
Designer’s opinion on the method of pier
foundation was requested.
Following the recommendation of the
Responsible Designers for the bridge Suvovara,
whose statement is attached as an annex, the
bottom of the eastern part of the foundation pit
of pier S5 L was cleaned to the solid rock mass.
After cleaning the foundation pit, a replacement
of the material was made with concrete MB 30
to the level of the foundation.”
Both Designer's Statements attached to
foundation pit S2 L are also apply to the
foundation pit S5 L
Additional costs calculation – 55.473,48 €
Contractor didn’t claimed any EoT
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
fundiranja stuba S5 L.
U Aneksu istog Geološkog izvještaja odgovorni
Geolog navodi:
„Nakon završetka iskopa i urađenih
prospekcijskih bušotina u temeljnoj jami stuba
S5 L, a zbog lošijih inženjersko-geoloških
uslova fundiranja stuba u jednom dijelu
temeljne jame, zatraženo je mišljenje
Projektanta o načinu fundiranja stuba.
Po preporuci odgovornih Projektanata za most
Suvovara, čiju izjavu prilažemo kao prilog uz
ovaj aneks, izvršeno je čišćenje dna temelja
stuba S5 L do čvrste stijenske mase. Nakon
čišćenja temeljne jame izvršena je zamjena
materijala sa betonom MB 30 do kote
fundiranja.“
Obije Izjave Projektanta priložene uz temeljnu
jamu S2 L odnose se i na temeljnu jamu S5 L
Proračun dodatnih troškova – 55.473,48 €
Izvođač ne potražuje produženje roka;
11
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

Picture 1: Main Design – Engineering-geological map

Slika 1: Glavni projekt – Inženjersko-geološka karta

Picture 2: Main Design – Suvovara bridge – left axis - Longitudinal EG section

Slika 2: Glavni projekt –most Suvovara – lijeva osa – podužni IG presjek

 2.2 Claim Event No. 054/2  2.2 Događaj Potraživanja br. 054/2

12

Foundation pit of the abutment O1 L was
excavated at the designed elevation. Due to the

fact that no geotechnical environment suitable
for shallow foundation geotechnical category D
was found in the south part of the foundation
pit, as well as the fact that the cavern of
dimensions 2x0,7x3 m (length x width x depth)
was found in the south-western part of the
excavation, the Contractor asked the Designer
to check the type of foundation in accordance
with the actual existing geotechnical
environment. Also, prospective drilling was
performed in order to confirm the actual
geotechnical environment of the foundation soil,
and based on the obtained results and in
accordance with the Designers' Statements,
parts of poorer rock mass was removed from the
bottom of the foundation pit to the required
geotechnical environment, and these are
gradually filled with MB30 concrete, the same
as the cavern.
In Contractor’s filly detailed Claim No.
054/2; in the chapter The Events giving rise to
Claim (Factual-Matter Analysis);
Background, it is stated: “ On construction site
of Subsection 3.1, the Contractor encounter a
change in the geological conditions at the
bridge #6 Suvovara at the bottom of the
foundation of abutment A1L.
The Contractor consider this adverse physical
conditions to have been Unforeseeable,
therefore in accordance with SC 4.12 of the
Design and Built Contract for Bar – Boljare
Highway, the Contractor informed the Engineer
that we encountered unforeseeable physical
conditions on the construction site via letter
RB-BBH/1387/CD-P3 dated on 05.04.2018
(Enclosure 2).
Having in mind that this changed geological
conditions led to a variation to the scope of
Works, therefore pursuant to Sub-clause 13.9
Unforeseeable Works, the Contractor asked the
Engineer to apply the required Variation
procedure in accordance to Contract Sub-
clauses 13.1 and 13.3.
The above mentioned Unforeseeable Physical
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Temeljna jama oporca O1 L iskopana je na
projektovanoj koti. Uslijed činjenice da u
južnom dijelu temeljne jame nije nađena
geotehnička sredina pogodna za plitko
fundiranje; geotehnička kategorija D, kao i
činjenica da je u jugozapadnom dijelu iskopa
prisutna kaverna dimenzija 2x0,7x3 m (dužina x
širina x dubina), Izvođač je zatražio od
Projektanta provjeru tipa fundiranja u skladu sa
stvarnom zatečenom geotehničkom sredinom.
Takođe, izvedena su prospekcijska bušenja u
svrhu potvrđivanja stvarne geotehničke sredine
temeljnog tla, a na osnovu dobivenih rezultata i
sukladno Izjavama Projektanata sa dna temeljne
jame uklonjeni su dijelovi lošije stijenske mase
do zahtjevane geotehničke sredine, te su iste
stepenasto zapunjene betonom marke MB30;
jednako kao i kaverna.
U priloženom Izvođačevom detaljnom
Potraživanju br. 054/2; u poglavlju Događaji
koji su doveli do potraživanja (Analiza
činjenićnog stanja); Pozadina, navedeno je
slijedeće: “Na gradilištu podsekcije 3.1 Izvođač
se susreo sa promjenom geoloških uslova na
mostu br. 6 Suvovara, temelj oporca O1L.
Izvođač smatra da su ovi nepovoljni fizički
uslovi Nepredvidivi, stoga u skladu sa PK 4.12
Ugovora o projektovanju i izgradnji autoputa
Bar – Boljare, Izvođač je obavijestio Inženjera
dopisom RB-BBH/1387/CD-P3 datiranim
05.04.2018. godine (Prilog 2) da smo se susreli
sa nepredvidivim fizičkim uslovima na
gradilištu.
Imajući u vidu da su svi ovi promjenjeni
geološki uslovi doveli do varijacije obima
Radova, stoga je u skladu sa Podklauzulom 13.9
Nepredvidivi radovi. Izvođač je zatražio od
Inženjera da primjeni neophodnu Proceduru o
varijaciji u skladu sa Podklauzulama 13.1 i 13.3
Ugovora.
13

Conditions are all recorded in the following
documents:
Statement regarding foundation conditions at
Abutment A1L (Enclosure 4)
However, the Engineer rejected Contractor’s
request via its letter IG/6816/VM dated on
11.04.2018 (Enclosure 3) on the bases that the
geological conditions reported by the
Contractor are undoubtedly not unforeseeable
works under Sub-clause 13.9.
The Contractor disagrees with this opinion and
submitted a notice of claim for time and cost via
its letter RB-BBH/1447/CD dated on
16.04.2018.
In the chapter Cost (Damage) Analyses the
Contractor states as follow:
“Due to the allocation of additional resources,
in order to complete Unforeseeable works, the
Contractor is entitled to the following costs:
No. Position Item
1 A1L Additional excavation
2 Additional concrete
3 Management cost 10%
TOTAL AMOUNT
Contractor also attached Opinion about
foundation conditions, and below are the
statements from the Geological Reports on the
mapping of foundation pits, as well as their
annexes, as follows:
Foundation pit O1 L
In related Geological Report, Geologist in charge
states as follows:
“By geological mapping of foundation pit of
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Gorenavedeni Nepredvidivi fizički uslovi su
evidentirani u slijedećim dokumentima:
Mišljenje u vezi uslova temeljenja oporca O1L
(Prilog 4)
Međutim, Inženjer je odbio zahtjev Izvođača
putem dopisa IG/6816/VM datiranog
11.04.2018. godine (Prilog 3), smatrajući da
geološki uslovi koje je konstatovao Izvođač bez
sumnje ne predstavljaju nepredvidive radove u
skladu sa Podklauzulom 13.9
Izvođač se ne slaže s ovim mišljenjem i podnio
je Obaviještenje o potraživanju za vrijeme i
troškove preko svog dopisa RB-BBH/1447/CD
datiranog 16.04.2018. godine.“
U poglavlju Analiza troškova (Štete) Izvođač
navodi slijedeće:
„Za raspoređivanja dodatnih sredstava za
kompletiranje Nepredvidljivih radova, Izvođač
ima pravo na sledeće troškove:
Quantity Unit price Amount
68,299 20,55 1.403,54
68,299 246,60 16.842,53
1.824,61
20.070,68
Izvođač je takođe priložio Mišljenje u vezi
uslova temeljenja, a u nastavku donosimo
navode iz Geološkog izvještaja o kartiranju
temeljne jame, kao i njegovog aneksa, kako
slijedi:
Temeljna jama O1 L
U vezanom Geološkom izvještaju, odgovorni
Geolog Izvođača navodi slijedeće:
„Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnog oporca O1
14
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

abutment O1 L, it has been found that the L utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i inženjersko-
lithological composition and engineering- geološke karakteristike odgovaraju napisanom
geological characteristics correspond to the u Geotehničkom elaboratu za most Suvovara.
present in the Geotechnical Design for bridge Iskop je rađen mašinski do projektovane kote....
Suvovara. Excavation was done mechanically to
designed level…
Veći dio temeljnog iskopa izgrađuju flišni
Most od excavation of foundation pit contracts
sedimenti predstavljeni pjeskovitim
flysch sediments, while the southern side of the
krečnjacima i pješčarima, dok je južna strana
excavation was build from decay of sandstone
iskopa izgrađena od raspadine pješčara i
and sandy limestone with the content of the
pjeskovitih krečnjaka sa sadržajem prašinasto-
dusty-clay component…
glinovite komponente...
It is noticed smaller tectonical activity followed
Zapaža se manja tektonska aktivnost koju prate
by appearance of joints with the falling element
pojave pukotina sa elementima pada F3 56/68 i
F3 56/68 and 155/42. In the south-western part
155/42. U jugozapadnom dijelu iskopa prisutna
of the excavation there is a cavern of dimensions
je kaverna dimenzija 2x0,7x3 m (dužina x širina
2x0,7x3 m (length x width x depth)
x dubina).
Eignt prospecting studied boreholes were drilled,
Urađeno je 8 prospekcijskih bušotina, kojima je
which determinated the geological structure of
utvrđena geološka građa terena ispod
the terrain bellow the bottom of foundation of
temeljnog dna oporca O1 L.
pier O1 L.
Rezultati bušenja pokazali su povoljne
The drilling results showed favourable
inženjersko-geološke karakteristike u
engineering-geological characteristics in the
sjevernom dijelu temelja do kaverne, dok je
northern part of the foundation to the cavern,
drugi dio koji se pruža od kaverne ka jugu,
while the other part flows from the cavern to the
zapadu i istoku zbog prisustva diskontinuiteta u
south, the west and the esat due to a presence of
stijenskoj masi i inženjersko-geoloških
discontinuity in the rock mass and the
svojstava stijenske mase nepovoljan za
engineering-geological properties of the rock
fundiranje.
mass are unfavourable for the foundation.
Zbog karakteristika stijenske mase koja je
Due to the characteristic of the rock mass that is
zastupljena na južnoj i dijelu zapadne i istočne
present on the eouth and part of the western side
strane oporca, potrebno je dodatno mišljenje
of the abutment, it is needed additional
Projektanta za uslove fundiranja temeljnog
Designer’s opinion for the conditions of
oporca O1 L.“
foundation of abutment O1 L.”
In the Annex to the same Geological Report, the
responsible Geologist states: U Aneksu istog Geološkog izvještaja odgovorni
Geolog navodi:
“After completion of the excavation and the
completed prospective boreholes of the „Nakon završetka iskopa i urađenih
abutment O1 L, due to a poor engineering- prospekcijskih bušotina u temeljnom iskopu
geological conditions in one part of the oporca O1 L, a zbog lošijih inženjersko-
foundation pit of funding of abutment, the geoloških uslova fundiranja stuba u jednom
Designer’s opinion on the method of abutment dijelu iskopa, zatraženo je mišljenje
foundation was requested. Projektanta o načinu fundiranja stuba.
Following the recommendation of the Po preporuci odgovornih Projektanata za most

15

Responsible Designers for the bridge Suvovara,
whose statement is attached as an annex to this
annex, deeping was done and the bottom of the
southern, wastern and eastern part of the
foundation pit of abutment O1 L was cleaned
untill the solid rock mass. After cleaning the
foundation pit, a replacement of the material
was made with concrete MB 30 to the level of
the foundation.”
In attached Opinion Regarding Foundation
Conditions at Abutment O1 L on Suvovara
Bridge at Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo
Motorway Section, authors Kenan Imširpašić
and Enes Lakota – bridge Designers for
Suvovara bridge it states:
“By email dated on 29 January 2018 You have
submitted to us Report About Engineering-
Geological Mapping at Foundation Pit of
abutment O1-L at Suvovara Bridge and asked
for opinion.
We have reviewed mentioned Report as well as
bedding stresses for abutment foundation O1-L.
According to our opinion there are good
conditions for bigger part of foundation.
Exception is only south part of construction pit,
as well as registered cavern (dimensions
according to your report 2x0,7x3 m) Maximal
bedding stresses for whole foundation are up to
520 kPa in additional and seismic load
combinations. Permissible loads for abutment
O1-L according to Geotechnical final report for
Suvovara bridge are much higher than
mentioned values.
Considering that foundation pit is dry and
stable, we suggest keeping foundation of
abutment O1-L with position and dimensiones as
in Main Design, with construction of
replacement materials on south part of pit, down
to geologically favourable layers, as well as
concrete filling of registered cavern.
Weaker materials could be replaced with
blinding concrete, or thicker layers with spar
concrete.”
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Suvovara, čiju izjavu prilažemo kao prilog uz
ovaj aneks, izvršeno je produbljenje i čišćenje u
južnom, zapadnom i istočnom dijelu do čvrste
stijenske mase. Nakon čišćenja temeljnog
iskopa izvršena je zamjena materijala sa
betonom MB 30 do kote fundiranja.“
U priloženom Mišljenju u vezi uslova
temeljenja oporca O1 L mosta Suvovara
autoputa Smokovac – Uvač – Mateševo,
autora Kenana Imširpašića i Enesa Lakote –
Projektanata mosta Suvovara navedeno je:
„Putem elektronske pošte ste nam 29. januara
2018 dostavili Izvještaj o inženjersko-
geološkom kartiranju temeljne jame oporca
O1-L mosta Suvovara, te zatražili mišljenje.
Pogledali smo pomenuti izvještaj, kao i
naprezanja temeljne stope oporca O1-L.
Prema našem mišljenju za veći dio temeljne
stope radi se o povoljnim uslovima za
temeljenje. Izuzetak je južna strana temeljne
jame, te dio oko registrovane kaverne
(dimenzija prema Vašem izvještaju 2x0,7x3
m).Maksimalna naprezanja cijelog temelja su
do 520 kPa u dopunskim i izuzetnim
kombinacijama opterećenja. Dozvoljena
opterećenja tla prema Geotehničkom elaboratu
za oporac O1-L mosta Suvovara su znatno viša
od pomenutih vrijednosti.
S obzirom da je temeljna jama suha i stabilna,
predlažemo zadržavanje temeljne stope O1-L
sa položajem i dimenzijama prema Glavnom
projektu, uz izradu zamjenskog materijala do
geološki povoljnih slojeva ispod južnog dijela
stope, kao i ispunu registrovane kaverne
betonom.
Zamjena lošeg materijala ispod temeljne stope
se može vršiti sa podložnim betonom ili na
većim dubinama špar betonom.“
16

The Annex is accompanied by a Statement on
the geotechnical conditions for the foundation
of the Suvovara Bridge abutment O1L,
authored by the responsible Designer Peng
Tingjia and geologist Saša Cupać, which states:
“After the excavation of foundation pits for
abutment O1L was finished, we received letter
from Subcontractor, company Bemax, which was
sent to the Main Contractor. In letter, opinion of
designers Mr Kenan Imširpašić and Mr Enes
Lakota was submitted. The Report of
engineering-geological mapping foundation pit,
done by geology engineer Radovan Čvorović,
was also submitted. After the insight into this
letter, we make the following conclusion.
By geological mapping of foundation pit of
abutment, it has been found that the lithological
composition and EG characteristics correspond
to the Geotechnical Report for Suvovara bridge.
Foundation pit is made of flysch sediments
presented by sandy limestones and sandstones,
while the southern side of the excavation was
built from the decay of sandstone and sandy
limestone with content of the dusty-clay
component. Compatibility is clearly visible with
the fall towards north-east.
Excavation is stabile, dry, excluding the western
side of the slope where is a leak of water.
In the south-western part of the excavation there
is a cavern of dimensions 2x0,7x3 m (length x
width x depth).
Eight prospecting studied boreholes were
drilled, which determinated the geological
structure of the terrain bellow the bottom of
foundation of abutment. The drilling results
showed unfavourable EG characterictics
(degradated rock) at the south part of
foundation bottom and cavern area.
Due to the unfavourable EG characteristics of
the rock mass in part of foundation pit, the
Contractor asked an additional Designer’s
opinion for the conditions of foundation of
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
U nastavku Aneksa priložena je Izjava o
geotehničkim uslovima fundiranja oporca
O1L mosta Suvovara, autora odgovornog
Projektanta Peng Tingjia i geologa Saše
Cupaća, u kojoj je navedeno:
„Nakon završetka temeljnih jama za oporac
O1L, dobili smo dopis podizvođača preduzeća
Bemax koji su upućeni Glavnom Izvođaču. U
dopisima je priloženo mišljenje Projektanta g-
dina Kenana Imširpašića i g-dina Enesa
Lakote. Takođe, dostavljen nam je Izvještaj o
inženjersko-geološkom kartiranju temeljnog
iskopa koje je izradio inženjer geologije
Radovan Čvorović. Nakon uvida u dostavljenu
dokumentaciju konstatovano je slijedeće:
Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnog iskopa
oporca utvrđeno je da je litološki sastav i IG
karakteristike odgovaraju Geotehničkom
elaboratu za most Suvovara.
Temeljni iskop izgrađuju flišni sedimenti
predstavljeni pjeskovitim krečnjacima i
pješčarima, dok je južna strana iskopa
izgrađena od raspadine pješčara i pjeskovitih
krečnjaka sa sadržajem prašinasto-glinovite
komponente. Slojevitost je jasno vidljiva sa
padom prema sjeveroistoku.
Iskop je stabilan i suv, izuzimajući zapadnu
stranu kosine gdje je prisutno curenje vode.
U jugozapadnom dijelu iskopa prisutna je
kaverna dimenzija 2x0,7x3 m (dužina x širina x
dubina).
Urađeno je 8 prospekcijskih bušotina, kojima
je utvrđena geološka građa terena ispod
temeljnog dna oporca. Rezultati bušenja su
pokazali nepovoljne IG karakteristike
(degradirana stijena) u južnom dijelu temeljnog
dna i zoni kaverne.
Zbog nepovoljnih IG karakteristika stijenske
mase u dijelu temeljnog iskopa, zatraženo je od
strane Izvođača dodatno mišljenje Projektanta
17

abutment.
There are good conditions for bigger part of
foundation. Exception is only the south part of
construction pit, as well as registered cavern.
Maximal bedding stresses for the whole
foundation are up to 520 kPa in additional and
seismic load combinations. Permissible loads for
abutment O1-L according to Geotechnical final
report for Suvovara bridge are much higher.
It is necessary to replace material below
foundation level of Suvovara bridge abutment
O1L, where unfavourable rock mass is identified
by prospective boreholes. Replacement shall
made until the appearance of the favourable
rock mass. Foundation bottom should be stepped
after replacement.
Registered cavern shall be cleaned and filled
with concrete…
In the case of significant inflow of water into the
excavation (west slope), it must be removed.
After removing unfavourable material, the
foundation pit shall be filled with concrete
MB30 or in deeper layers with concrete MB30
combined with crushed solid limestone (spar
concrete).
Filling shall be performed up to the foundation
level. Afterwards, it can be continued with
following stages of foundation construction.
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
za uslove fundiranja oporca.
Veći dio temeljne stope izvodi se u povoljnim
uslovima za temeljenje. Izuzetak je južna strana
temeljne jame, te dio oko registrovane kaverne.
Maksimalna naprezanja cijelog temelja su do
520 kPa u dopunskim i izuzetnim
kombinacijama opterećenja. Dozvoljena
opterećenja tla prema Geotehničkom elaboratu
za oporac O1-L mosta Suvovara su znatno viša.
Potrebno je izvršiti zamjenu materijala ispod
kote fundiranja temelja oporca O1L mosta
Suvovara, gdje je prospekcijskim bušotinama
konstatovana nepovoljna stijenska masa.
Zamjenu izvršiti do pojave povoljne stijenske
mase. Dno temeljnih iskopa nakon zamjene
treba formirati stepenasto.
Registrovanu kavernu treba očistiti i ispuniti
betonom...
U slučaju značajnijeg priliva vode u iskop
(zapadna kosina) istu ukloniti.
Nakon uklanjanja nepovoljnog materijala,
temeljni iskop zapuniti betonom marke MB30
ili na većim dubinama betonom MB30 u
kombinaciji sa lomljenim kamenom od svježe
krečnjačke stijene (spar beton).
Zapunjavanje izvesti do kote fundiranja. Nakon
toga, može se nastaviti sa slijedećim fazama
izgradnje temelja.“
18

3. TECHNICAL REVIEW OF
CONTRACTOR'S DOCUMENTATION
3.1. General comments
Both Claim Events; No. 054 and 054/2 are
related to existence of unfavourable material in
the parts of the bottom of the foundation pits for
piers S2 L, S4 L, S5 L and abutment O1 L, with
appearance of the cavern in the zone of
foundation soil for abutment O1 L; described in
the Claim Event 054/2.
3.2. Technical comments
In all of attached Geological Reports related to
foundation pits described in the frame of the
Claim Events No. 054 and 054/2, Contractor’s
Geologist in charge is stating:
“By geological mapping of foundation pit, it has
been found that the lithological composition and
engineering-geological characteristics
correspond to the present in the Geotechnical
Design for bridge Suvovara.
In the statement for the foundation S2 L, Bridge
Designer stated:
“…According to our opinion there are good
conditions for foundation. Exception is only
eastern part of construction pit.
Considering that foundation pit is dry and
stable, where risk of loss stability is not
registered, we suggest keeping foundation of
pier S2-L with position and dimensiones as in
Main Design, with construction of replacement
materials on eastern part of pit.
Weaker materials could be replaced with
blinding concrete, or thicker layers with spar
concrete.”
Similar conclusion was done by the same authors
on the issue of the foundation pit of abutment A1
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
3. TEHNIČKI PREGLED
DOKUMENTACIJE IZVOĐAČA
RADOVA
3.1. Opšti komentari
Oba događaja potraživanja; br. 054 i 054/2
odnose se na postojanje nepovoljnog materijala
u dijelovima temeljnog dna temeljnih jama
stubova S2 L, S4 L i S5 L i oporca O1 L,
zajedno sa pojavom kaverne u zoni temeljnog
tla oporca O1 L; opisane u Događaju
Potraživanja 054/2.
3.2. Tehnički komentari
U svim priloženim Geološkim izvještajima
vezanim za temeljne jame opisane u okviru
Događaja Potraživanja br. 054 i 054/2,
Izvođačev odgovorni Geolog izjavljuje:
„Geološkim kartiranjem temeljnoe jame
utvrđeno je da litološki sastav i inženjersko-
geološke karakteristike odgovaraju napisanom
u Geotehničkom elaboratu za most Suvovara
U Izjavi za temelj S2 L, Projektant mosta
navodi:
„.Prema našem mišljenju radi se o povoljnim
uslovima za temeljenje. Izuzetak je jedino
istočna strana temeljne jame.
S obzirom da je temeljna jama suha i stabilna,
te da nije registrovana opasnost od gubitka
stabilnosti, predlažemo zadržavanje temeljne
stope S2-L sa položajem i dimenzijama prema
Glavnom projektu, uz izradu zamjenskog
materijala do geološki povoljnih slojeva ispod
istočnog dijela stope.
Zamjena lošeg materijala se može vršiti sa
podložnim betonom ili na većim dubinama špar
betonom.“
Sličan zaključak donesen je od strane istih
19

L.
Also, conclusion from Geotechnical Designers
statement, related to the same foundation pits is:
1. It is necessary to replace material
bellow foundation level of Suvovara bridge piers
S2L, S4L and S5L, where soil and weak rock
mass are identify by prospective boreholes.
Replacement shall be made untill the
appearance of the favourable rock mass of
geotechnical category D. Foundation bottoms
should be stepped after replacement.
2. Based on information from the terrain
and annexes of geological mapping reports, as
well as consultations with the Engineer and the
Contractor. Contractor is required after
remooving unfavourable material to fill
foundation pit with concrete MB30, or in deeper
layers with concrete MB30 combined with
crushed solid limestone (spar concrete). Filling
shall be performed up to the foundation level.
Afterwards, it can be continued with next stages
of foundation construction.
Similar conclusion was done by the same
authors on the issue of the foundation pit of
abutment A1 L.
Also, we are referring to the Geotechnical Final
Report for Main Design for the Suvovara
Bridge; chapter 7 CONCLUSION, where is
stated as follow:
Geotechnical Final Report for bridge Suvovara
has been made according to the Design of
detailed geotechnical investigations, and is a
synthesis of the research results from this phase,
previous phases and analysis of available fund
documentation from similar projects in the
flysch terrains.
Based on the investigation results, we have
defined the geological, hydrogeological,
engineering-geological and geotechnical
conditions for construction of the bridge. We
have also defined the necessary scope of
geotechnical monitoring and supervision over
bridgeconstruction with which conditions for
construction will be optimized. Taken as a
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
autora po pitanju temeljne jame oporca O1 L.
Takođe, zaključak iz izjave geotehničkih
Projektanata, vezan za iste temeljne jame je:
1. Potrebno je izvršiti zamjenu materijala
ispod kote fundiranja temelja stubova S2L, S4L
i S5L mosta Suvovara, gdje je prospekcijskim
bušotinama konstatovano tlo i loša stijenska
masa. Zamjenu tla izvršiti do pojave povoljne
stijenske mase geotehničke kategorije D. Dno
temeljnih iskopa nakon zamjene treba formirati
stepenasto.
2. Na osnovu informacija sa terena, uvidu
u anekse geoloških izvještaja o kartiranju, kao i
konsultacija sa Nadzorom i Izvođačem, od
Izvođača se traži da nakon što je uklonio loš
materijal, zapuni temeljni iskop betonom marke
MB30, ili na većim dubinama betonom MB30 u
kombinaciji sa lomljenim kamenom od svježe
krečnjačke stijene (špar beton). Zapunjavanje
izvesti do kote fundiranja. Nakon toga, može da
se nastavi sa slijedećim fazama izgradnje
temelja.“
Sličan zaključak donesen je od strane istih
autora po pitanju temeljne jame oporca O1 L.
Pozivamo se na Elaborat o detaljnim
geotehničkim istraživanjima za nivo glavnog
građevinskog projekta za most Suvovara;
poglavlje 7 ZAKLJUČAK, gdje je izjavljeno
slijedeće:
Geotehnički elaborat za most Suvovara, urađen
je shodno Projektu detaljnih geotehničkih
istraživanja, i kao takav predstavlja sintezu
rezultata istraživanja iz ove faze, prethodnih
faza i analize razpoložljive fondovske
dokumentacije sličnih projekata na flišnim
terenima.
Na osnovu rezultata istraživanja definisali smo
geološke, hidrogeološke, inženjerskogeološke i
geotehničke uslove izgradnje mosta. Takođe
smo definisali potreban obim geotehničkog
monitoringa i nadzora izrade mosta s kojim če
se moći optimizovati uslovi izgradnje. U cjelini
gledano, geotehnički uslovi gradnje mosta
20

whole, geotechnical conditions of construction
of bridge Suvovara are relatively favourable on
the left lane and somewhat less favourable on
the right lane.
However, the results of the calculations have
shown that bridge can be founded both; on
shallow or deep foundations.
However, we have to take into account the
possibility of increased groundwater discharges
in the hydrogeological maximums into
construction pits and the support locations. This
can lead to degradation of the flysch and partial
loss of bearing capacity and higher settlrements.
This is especially relevant to the right lane,
where weaker flysch was found. Therefore, we
are recommended that deep foundation is
considered at least for the right lane.
The final choice should certainly be made by
designer on the bases of a technical and
economic analysis.
3.3. Technical conclusion
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Suvovara su relativno povoljni na lijevoj traci i
nešto manje povoljni na desnoj traci.
Proračuni koje smo napravili ukazuju na to da
se može fundiranje na obje trake izvesti plitko
ili duboko fundiranje.
Ali pritom je potrebno uzeti u obzir da kod
iskopa građevinske jame može doći (u
hidrološkom maksimumu) do povećanih dotoka
podzemne ili površinske vode u jamu, što može
dovesti do degradacije fliša i njegovog
slabljenja u smislu nosivosti i slijeganja. To
pogotovo važi za zonu desne trake gdje se
javlja slabiji fliš. Stoga smatramo, da je barem
za desnu traku primjerenije fundiranje na
šipovima.
Konačnu odluku o vrsti fundiranja prepuštamo
projektantu, koji će izabrati način fundiranja
na osnovu tehničko-ekonomske analize.
3.3. Tehnički zaključak
21

In supporting documents for the Claim Events
No. 054 and 054/2, Contractor explained
unforeseeable geological conditions as a
consequences of:
“On construction site of Subsection 3.1, the
Contractor encounter a change in the geological
conditions at the bridge #6 Suvovara at the
bottom of the foundation of piers P2L, P4L and
P5L.”
We are referring to the Preliminary Design for
Suvovara bridge, where was stated: “Deluvial
deposits are variable thicknesses from 1 to 3 m.
Certainly, the greater thickness of deluvial
deposits is not excluded locally, in the form of
pockets.”
From our point of view, weaker materials
replacement with blinding concrete, or in thicker
layers with spar concrete, cannot be taken into
consideration as any kind of Unforeseeable
Works taking into account Sub-Clause 13.9 of
Particular Conditions, where Unforeseeable
works are the works that relate to variation of
the scope of work due to changed geological,
hydrogeological and ecological conditions in
relation to the delivered Preliminary Design.
4. GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
U pratećim dokumentima Događaja
Potraživanja br. 054 i 054/2, Izvođač je
objasnio nepredvidive geološke uslove kao
poslijedice:
„Na gradilištu podsekcije 3.1 Izvođač se susreo
sa promjenom geoloških uslova na mostu br. 6
Suvovara, temelji stubova S2L, S4L i S5L i
temelj oporca O1L.“
Pozivamo se na Idejni projekt za most
Suvovara u kojem je navedeno: „Deluvijalne
naslage su promjenjive debljine od 1 do 3
m. Svakako, da se lokalno ne isključuje, u
vidu džepova, i veća debljina deluvijalnih
naslaga.“
Sa naše tačke gledišta, zamjena lošeg
materijala koja se vrši sa podložnim betonom ili
na većim dubinama špar betonom se ne može
uzeti u obzir kao bilo koja vrsta nepredvidivih
radova, uzimajući u obzir podklauzulu 13.9
Posebnih uslova, gde su nepredvidivi radovi
radovi koji se odnose na izmjene u opsegu
radova zbog promijenjenih geoloških,
hidrogeoloških i ekoloških uslova u odnosu na
dostavljeni Idejni projekat.
4. OPŠTI OPIS
22

Along the terrain of the Bar-Boljari highway,
section UVAČ-MATEŠEVO, through which the
designed Suvovara bridge is to be constructed,
the terrain is geologically built by:
Upper Cretaceous (K23F)
The basic rock mass is represented by flysch
sediments that occur in the facies of siltstones,
sandstones and packets of limestone. Deluvial
deposits are of variable thickness from 1 to 2 m.
They are heterogeneous in composition. The
dusty-sandy fraction with variable crumb
content (marl siltstones) dominates. Due to the
dusty-sandy fraction, they are generally of low
plasticity and hard consistency (Ic> 1). Due to
the relatively small transport, the pieces are
semi-rounded, ie with rare grains of gravel.
They are mostly water-saturated, medium-
consolidated and medium-compressible.
5. PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Duž terena autoputa Bar-Boljari, dionica
SMOKOVAC - UVAČ, kroz koji se treba izvesti
projektovani most Suvovara teren geološki
izgrađuje:
Gornja kreda(K23F)
Osnovnu stijensku masu predstavljaju flišni
sedimenti koji se javljaju u faciji alevrolita,
pješčara i paketa krečnjaka. Deluvijalne
naslage su promjenljive debljine od 1 do 2 m.
Heterogenog su sastava. Dominira prašinasto
pjeskovita frakcija sa promjenljivim sadržajem
drobine (laporci alevroliti). Zbog prašinasto
pjeskovite frakcije generalno su niske
plastičnosti i tvrde konzistencije (Ic>1).U
koritu potoka je puliciklična facija – mješavina
aluvijalnih deluvijalnih naslaga. Zbog
relativno malog transporta, komadi su
poluzaobljeni, odnosno sa rijetkim zrnima
šljunka. Uglavnom su vodozasićene, srednje
konsolidovane i srednje stišljive.
5. IDEJNI PROJEKAT
23

We refer to the Elaborate on detailed
geotechnical investigations (bases for the level
of preliminary construction design) - Section
Uvac - Matesevo, where in the Separate for
bridges - Bridge No. 6 SUVOVARA (CH. km
22+749,98 to km 22+991,41 right lane
L=241,43) (ch. km 22+742,02 do km
22+925,46 left lane L=183,44), chapter 2.
TYPES AND SCOPE OF PERFORMED
WORKS was stated:
““The following investigation works were
carried out at the location of the Suvovaar
Bridge:
-Three trial pits: J-20; J-21 and J-25 (Appendix
No. 6.4);
"Two geoelectric sondes GS63 and GS64 ."
In Chapter 3. GEOTECHNICAL
CONDITIONS OF BRIDGE
CONSTRUCTION; subchapter 3.1. The
morphological properties of the terrain stated:
“The valley sides are extremely asymmetrical.
The right side up to 25⁰, and the left valley side
has a much milder slope. They were formed
within the flysch sediment and Cretaceous-
Paleogene age, on the sides of which, due to the
disintegration of rock masses and planned
leaching, deluvial sediment is deposited. ”
In Chapter 3.7. Analysis of geotechnical
conditions for bridge construction; subchapter
3.7.1. Analysis of funding conditions states:
“All piers should be funded in the basic rock
mass. The criterion of the depth of the
foundation pit to enter the basic rock mass is
min. 2.5 to 3.0 m. Resistant and deformable
characteristics of the relatively weakest, in the
mechanical sense, lithological members - clays
and siltstones are in such a range that the
occurrence of uneven subsidence and exceeding
the allowable load capacity is excluded. The
minimum value of the permissible load is 0.4
MPa. The resistance of rock masses to
excavation is small, so the excavation can be
performed completely mechanically. Temporary
protection of the foundation excavation can be
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Pozivamo se na Elaborat o detaljnim
geotehničkim istraživanjima (podloge za
nivo idejnog građevinskog projekta) –
dionica Uvač – Mateševo, gdje je Separatu za
mostove – MOST 6 SUVOVARA (st. km
22+749,98 do km 22+991,41 desna traka
L=241,43) (st. km 22+742,02 do km
22+925,46 lijeva traka L=183,44), u poglavlju
2. VRSTE I OBIM IZVEDENIH RADOVA
navedeno:
“Na lokaciji mosta Suvovara izvedeni su
sljedeći istražni radovi:
-Tri istražne jame: J-20; J-21 i J-25 (prilog br.
6.4.);
-Dvije geoelektrične sonde GS63 i GS64..”
U poglavlju 3. GEOTEHNIČKI USLOVI
IZGRADNJE MOSTA; potpoglavlje 3.1.
Morfološka svojstva terena navedeno je:
“Dolinske strane su izrazito asimetrične.
Desna strana do 25⁰, a lijeva dolinska strana
je znatno blažeg nagiba. Formirane su u
okviru sedimenta fliša i kredno-paleogene
starosti, po čijim stranama su
dezintegracijom stijenskih masa i planiranim
spiranjem, deponovanja deluvijalni sediment.”
U poglavlju 3.7. Analiza geotehničkih uslova
izgradnje mosta; potpoglavlju 3.7.1. Analiza
uslova fundiranja navedeno je:
“Sva stubna mjesta treba fundirati u
osnovnoj stijenskoj masi. Kriterijum dubina
temeljne jame da se u osnovnu stijensku
masu uđ|e min. 2,5 do 3,0 m. Otporne i
deformabilne karakteristike i relativno
najslabijih, u mehaničkom smislu, litoloških
članova – glinaca i alevrolita su u
takvom rasponu da se isključuju pojave
neravnomjernog slijeganja i prekoračenja
dozvoljene nosivosti. Minimalna vrijednost
dozvoljene nosivosti iznosi 0,4 MPa.
Otpornost stijenskih masa prema iskopu je
mala pa se iskop u potpunosti može izvesti
24

provided by a wide excavation with a slope
inclination of 1.5: 1.0. Only in the central part of
the designed bridge, in the closestzone of the
stream, smaller occurrences of groundwater are
expected. Groundwater can be easily evacuated
from drainage pits by sludge pumps. Provision
should be made for a leveling layer (tampon) of
lean concrete up to 0.1 m thick. If possible, the
piers should be placed outside the influence of
the stream in order to make the foundation pits
execution in dry. ”
In Chapter 4 CONCLUSION states: “The
terrain in the bridge zone is built mainly of
flysch sediments represented by claystones,
thin-layered marls, sandstones and sandy
limestones, while in the surface parts deluvial-
eluvial sediments of small thickness are
present. These are relatively well-bearing rock
masses and represent a favorable geotechnical
environment for the foundation of bridge piers.
It is recommended that the bridge piers be
founded in the basic rock mass - flysch at a
depth of min. 2.5 - 3 m.
In the Partial Report on geotechnical
investigations of the terrain, within the
corridor of the designed route of the highway
Bar - Boljari, section Podgorica - Veruša,
part Veternik - Čestograzst. km 19 + 625 to
km 32 + 743; Chapter 2 ANALYSIS OF
GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS OF
HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION states the
following:
Zone 43- bridge km 22 + 744– km 22 + 928
(Suvovara M-6 bridge)
The Suvovara Bridge is designed over a wide
valley, ie it bridges a stream with a permanent
watercourse along which the road to Močila
and Ptić goes. The valley sides are
asymmetrical, the right side is steeper up to
25⁰, and the left valley side has a much milder
slope - 10⁰. The basic rock mass is represented
by flysch sediments that occur in the facies of
siltstones, sandstones and packets of limestone.
The bridge is of great length - 390 m. The
maximum height of the bridge is about 20 m.
Deluvial deposits are variable thicknesses from
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
mehanizovano. Privremena zaštita temeljnog
iskopa može se obezbijediti širokim iskopom
sa nagibom kosina 1,5:1,0. Samo u
centralnom dijelu projektovanog mosta, u
neposrednoj zoni potoka, očekuju se manje
pojave podzemne vode. Iz drenažnih jama
podzemna voda se može lako evakuisati
muljnim pumpama. Treba predvidjeti
izradu izravnavajućeg sloja (tampona) od
mršavog betona debljine do 0,1 m. Ukoliko je
moguće stubna mjesta postaviti izvan uticaja
potoka kako bi se temeljne jame izvele u
suvom.”
U poglavlju 4. ZAKLJUČAK navedeno je:
“Teren u zoni mosta izgrađuju u osnovi
flišni sedimenti predstavljeni glincima,
tankoslojevitim laporcima, pješčarima i
pjeskovitim krečnjacima, dok su u površinskim
djelovima zastupljeni deluvijalno-eluvijalni
sedimenti male debljine. Radi se o relativno
dobro nosivim stijenskim masama i
predstavljaju povoljnu geotehničku sredinu za
fundiranje mostovskih stubova. Preporučuje se
da se mostovski stubovi fundiraju u osnovnoj
stijenskoj masi – flišu na dubini min. 2,5 – 3 m.
U Parcijalnom Izvještauj o geotehničkim
istraživanjima terena, unutar koridora
projektovane trase autoputa Bar – Boljari,
dionica Podgorica – Veruša, dio Veternik
-Čestograzst. km 19+625 do st. km
32+743; u poglavlju 2. ANALIZA
GEOTEHNIČKIH USLOVA GRAĐENJA
AUTOPUTA navedeno je slijedeće:
Zona 43- most st. km 22+744– st. km 22+928
(most Suvovara M-6)
Most Suvovara projektovan je preko široke
doline, odnosno premošćuje potok sa stalnim
vodotokom duž kojeg ide put za Močila i
Ptić. Dolinske strane su asimetrične, desna je
strmija do 25⁰, a leva dolinska strana je
znatno blažeg nagiba - 10⁰. Osnovnu stensku
masu predstavljaju flišni sedimenti koji se
javljaju u faciji alevrolita, peščara i paketa
krečnjaka. Most je velike dužine – 390 m.
25

1 to 3 m. Certainly, the greater thickness of
deluvial deposits is not excluded locally, in the
form of pockets. The thickness of alluvial
deluvial deposits up to 3.0 m thick is expected
in the stream bed. In any case, the piers should
be funded in the basic rock mass, which would
go at least 1.5 to 2.0 m deep. The estimated
depth would be about 4-5 m. The resistant and
deformable characteristics of even the weakest,
in the mechanical sense lithological members -
clays and claystones - are in such a range that
the phenomena of uneven subsidence and
exceeding the allowed bearing capacity are
excluded. The minimum value of the
permissible load is 400 kPa. The resistance of
rock masses to excavation is small and can be
executed completely mechanically. Temporary
protection of the excavation of the foundation
pits can be provided by a wide excavation with
a slope of 1.5: 1.0. Only in the central part of
the designed bridge, in the close zone of the
stream, smaller occurrences of groundwater
are expected. Groundwater can be easily
evacuated from drainage pits with sludge
pumps. It should be planned to make a leveling
layer (tampon) from lean concrete up to 0.1 m
thick.”
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Maksimalna visina mosta je oko 20 m.
Deluvijalne naslage su promenljive debljine
od 1 do 3 m. Svakako, da se lokalno ne
isključuje, u vidu džepova, i veća debljina
deluvijalnih naslaga. U koritu potoka očekuje
se debljina aluvijalno deluvijalnih naslaga
debljine do 3,0m. U svakom slučaju stubna
mesta treba fundirati u osnovnoj stenskoj
masi, u koju bi se zašlo min 1,5 do 2,0 m.
Procenjena dubina bi bila oko 4-5m.
Otporne i deformabilne karakteristike i
relativno najslabijih, u mehaničkom smislu
litoloških članova –glinaca i alevrolita su u
takvom rasponu da se isključuju pojave
neravnomernog sleganja i prekoračenja
dozvoljene nosivosti. Minimalna vrednost
dozvoljene nosivosti iznosi 400 kPa.
Otpornost stenskih masa prema iskopu je
mala i u potpunosti se može izvesti
mehanizovano. Privremena zaštita temeljnog
iskopa može se obezbediti širokim iskopom sa
nagibom kosina 1,5:1,0. Samo u centralnom
delu projektovanog mosta, u neposrednoj
zoni potoka, očekuju se manje pojave
podzemne vode. Iz drenažnih jama muljnim
pumpama podzemna voda se može lako
evakuisati. Treba predvideti izradu
izravnavajućeg sloja (tampona) od mršavog
betona debljine do 0,1 m.“
26
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

Picture 3: FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT for preparation of the Preliminary Design for Bar-
Boljare Highway, section: Podgorica - Veruša – Engineering-Geological map for location of the Suvovara
bridge
Slika 3: ELABORAT DETALJNIH GEOTEHNIČKIH ISTRAŽIVANJA za izradu Idejnog projekta
autoputa Bar-Boljare, deonica: Podgorica - Veruša – Inženjerskogeološka karta na lokaciji mosta
Suvovara

27
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

Picture 4: FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT for preparation of the Preliminary Design for Bar-
Boljare Highway, section: Podgorica - Veruša – Longitudinal EG section for location of the Suvovara
bridge
Slika 4: ELABORAT DETALJNIH GEOTEHNIČKIH ISTRAŽIVANJA za izradu Idejnog projekta
autoputa Bar-Boljare, deonica: Podgorica - Veruša – Podužni IG profil na lokaciji mosta Suvovara

6. CONCLUSION ON PRELIMINARY 6. ZAKLJUČAK U VEZI SA IDEJNIM

28

DESIGN
Taking into account main purpose of the
Preliminary Design to provide an input data to
Design-and- Built Contractor; by relatively low,
but sufficient level of geotechnical
investigations, foundation soil with higher
thickness of dilluvial deposits, as well as
forming of the pockets was forecasted in related
Geotechnical Report and Partial Report. All
mentioned documents were available to the
Contractor in the tendering stage of the Project.
Also, the general geotechnical model of the
terrain observed during the foundation pits
excavation (most of excavation of foundation pit
contracts flysch sediments, represented by sandy
limestones and sandstones, while smaller of the
excavation was build from decay of sandstone
and sandy limestone with the content of the
dusty-clay component) match in total
descriptions from geotechnical documents from
Preliminary Design.
Bearing in mind all above mentioned, as well as
the fact that mentioned information is considered
as sufficient for the level of Preliminary Design,
as well as the fact that Design and Built
Contractor is experienced and worldwide
recognized Contractor, with previous knowledge
of similar Works in similar environment, the
Engineer's opinion is that mentioned phenomena
cannot be treated as Unforeseeable Geological
Conditions.
7. CONTRACTOR'S CLAIM ANALIZY
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
PROJEKTOM
Uzimajući u obzir glavnu svrhu Idejnog
projekta da obezbijedi ulazne podatke za
izvođača radova na projektovanju i izgradnji;
relativno niskim, ali dovoljnim nivoom
geotehničkih istraživanja, temeljno tlo sa većom
debljinom deluvijalnih naslaga, kao i lokalna
mogućnost pojave džepova predviđena je u
vezanom Geotehničkom elaboratu i Parcijalnom
izvještaju. Svi navedeni dokumenti bili su
dostupni Izvođaču u tenderskoj fazi Projekta.
Takođe, generalni geotehnički model terena
zatečen iskopom temeljnih jama (veći dio
temeljnog iskopa izgrađuju flišni sedimenti
predstavljeni pjeskovitim krečnjacima i
pješčarima, dok je manji dio iskopa izgrađen od
raspadine pješčara i pjeskovitih krečnjaka sa
sadržajem prašinasto-glinovite komponente) u
potpunosti odgovara opisima iz geotehničke
dokumentacije Idejnog projekta.
Imajući u vidu sve gore navedeno, kao i
činjenicu da se pomenute informacije smatraju
dovoljnim za nivo Idejnog projekta, kao i
činjenicu da je Izvođač radova na projektovanju
i izgradnji iskusan i svjetski priznat Izvođač, sa
prethodnim poznavanjem sličnih radova u
sličnom okruženju, mišljenje Nadzornog organa
je da se pomenuti fenomen ne može tretirati kao
nepredvidivi geološki uslovi.
7. ANALIZA POTRAŽIVANJA
29
 Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo

In this Expert's Witness Report we have also IZVOĐAČA RADOVA

analysed Contractor's Claims No. 054 and 054/2
U ovom Izvještaju eksperta smo takođe
for Additional Payment (under SC 20.1). Our
analizirali Potraživanja izvođača br. 054 i 054/2
clarification is follow:
za dopunsko plaćanje (pod SC 20.1). Naše
Description of Employer's risk event: pojašnjenje je sljedeće:
Unforeseeable difficulties caused by changes
Opis slučaja rizika za poslodavca:
in geological conditions
nepredvidive teškoće izazvane promjenama
The Contractor is making a claim in accordance u geološkim uslovima
with Sub-Clause 4.12 and Sub-Clause 13.9. The
Izvođač radova potražuje prema p.kl. 4.12 i
Engineer understands and they are concluding
p.kl. 13.9. Nadzorni organ razumije i zaključuje
the following:
sljedeće:
The Engineer took into account actual physical
Nadzorni organ je uzeo u obzir stvarne fizičke
conditions observed on the site during the events
uslove uočene na lokaciji tokom događaja
described in this Contractor's Claim, as well as
opisanih u ovom potraživanju Izvođača, kao i
the evidences of the physical conditions which
dokaze o fizičkim uslovima koje Izvođač može
may be foreseen by the Contractor when
predvidjeti prilikom podnošenja ponude – na
submitting the Tender - available to the
raspolaganju Izvođaču.
Contractor.
Po mišljenju Nadzornog organa, idejni projekat
As per the Engineer's opinion, Preliminary
- svi gore navedeni djelovi koji se odnose na
Design – all the above mentioned parts related to
Most br. 6 – most Suvovara su validni
the Bridge No. 6 - Suvovara bridge are valid
dokumenti, poznati izvođaču radova prilikom
documents, familiar to the Contractor when
dostavljanja ponude.
submitting the tender.
Navedena Dokumentacija, koja je dio Idejnog
The mentioned Documentation, which is a part
projekta, na osnovu izvedenih Geotehničkih
of the Preliminary Design, on the basis of the
istraživanja (GI) za okvir Idejnog projekta daje
executed Geotechnical explorations for the scope
preliminarne ulazne geološke i geotehničke
of the Preliminary Design, provides for input
podatke Izvođaču definisanjem opštih
geological and geotechnical data to the
predviđenih geoloških uslova, pa donosimo
Contractor by defining general foreseen
slijedeći konačan zaključak:
geological conditions, so we are making the
following final conclusion:

8. FINAL CONCLUSION 8. KONAČAN ZAKLJUČAK

30

Engineer's conclusion on Preliminary Design
facts is following:
 Mentioned Geotechnical elaborate was
done for the purpose of providing an
elementary Geotechnical data for the stage
of the Preliminary Design;
 Data were based on detailed Engineering –
geological mapping of the area, trial pits
execution and geoelectrical sondage of the
area – as per the Engineer's point of view
sufficient for the stage of the Preliminary
Design;
 An unambiguous geological description of
the terrain is given, with a defined
possibility of encountering lots of softer
material, which needs to be removed and
gradually replaced with blinding concrete:
Deluvial deposits are variable thicknesses
from 1 to 3 m. Certainly, the greater
thickness of deluvial deposits is not
excluded locally, in the form of pockets.
Clarification: in the Preliminary design
that the same type of geological sediments
will be encountered as the ones encountered
by the Contractor during the execution of
the excavation (flysch sediments), the
difference is only in the degree of the
surface decomposition of these sediments
and that is not the case throughout the entire
surface of the foundation pits, but along the
micro-location where the surface flysch
sediments are more decomposed. From our
point of view, replacement of weaker
materials with blinding concrete, or in
thicker layers with spar concrete, cannot be
taken into consideration as any kind of
Unforeseeable works.
By comparison of above mentioned Engineer's
conclusions with Sub-Clause 1.1.6.8.
“Unforeseeable” means not reasonably
foreseeable by an experienced Contractor by the
date for submission of the Tender; the Engineer
considers that incurred physical conditions
encountered under these report are foreseeable
physical conditions by experienced contractor
(Contractor’s Risk Events) under the Terms of
the Contract based on available documents by
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
Zaključak Nadzornog organa o činjenicama u
vezi sa Idejnim projektom je sljedeći:
 Navedeni Geotehnički elaborat je urađen u
cilju obezbjeđivanja elementarnih
geotehničkih podataka za fazu idejnog
projekta;
 Podaci su zasnovani na detaljnom
inženjersko - geološkom istraživanju
područja, istražnim raskopima i
geoelektričnom sondairanju terena – prema
Nadzornom organu dovoljnoj za fazu
Idejnog projekta;
 Dat je nedvosmisleni geološki opis terena,
sa definisanom mogućnosti nailaska na
partije mekšeg materijala, kojeg je
potrebno ukloniti i stepenasto zamijeniti
podložnim betonom: Deluvijalne naslage
su promenljive debljine od 1 do 3 m.
Svakako, da se lokalno ne isključuje, u
vidu džepova, i veća debljina deluvijalnih
naslaga. Pojašnjenje: Idejnim projektom
naglašeno da će se naići na isti tip
geoloških sedimenata na koje je i Izvođač
naišao tokom izvođenja iskopa (flišni
sedimenti) razlika je samo u stepenu
površinskog raspadanja ovih sedimenata i
to ne na cijelim površinama temeljnih jama
već duž mikrolokacija gdje su površinski
flišni sedimenti više raspadnuti. Sa naše
tačke gledišta, zamjena lošeg materijala
koja se vrši sa podložnim betonom ili na
većim dubinama špar betonom se ne može
uzeti u obzir kao bilo koja vrsta
nepredvidivih radova.
Poređenjem gore navedenih zaključaka
Nadzornog organa sa podtačkom 1.1.6.8.
Nepredvidivo predstavlja nešto što iskusni
Izvođač razumno nije mogao da predvidi do
vremena podnošenja Ponude; Inženjer
podrazumijeva da nastale fizičke uslove
nabrojene u ovom Izvještaju treba tretirati kao
predvidive fizičke uslove od strane Iskusnog
Izvođača (Rizični Događaji po Izvođača) prema
Ugovornim Uslovima, bazirano na osnovu
raspoložive dokumentacije dostupne do datuma
31

the time of the tender. Accordingly, all costs
attributable for dealing with these events in the
stage od design, build and remedy of defects are
included in the Accepted Contract Amount.
Design-and-Built Contractor wasn’t limitated in
choosing of type and quantity of geotechnical
investigations; in order to get accurate data on
geotechnical environment of foundation soil and
founding type of the bridge.
The Engineer is hereby establishing that the
mentioned works may not be treated as
Unforeseeable works, with an explanation that
the works may be foreseen by the experienced
Contractor from the delivered Preliminary
Design.
According to the Engineer, these are relatively
shallow zones of deluvial material spread over
smaller areas of the foundation feet, which
should be foreseen by an Experienced
Contractor.
Bearing in mind the fact that Suvovara bridge
construction was executed by the Sub-
Contractor; with the Contract based on unit
quantities of executed works, not Design-and-
Built, as the Contract of the Main Contractor, as
per the Engineer’s opinion, this claim is neither
factually nor contractually founded in the
Contract with the Employer.
So, bearing in mind all above mentioned, the
Engineer’s opinion is that Contractor’s claims
should be treated as unjustified.
Supervision of Design and Works
on the Bar – Boljare Highway,
Section Smokovac – Uvač –
Mateševo
za podnošenje ponude. Sukladno, svi troškovi
koji se mogu pripisati suočavanju s tim
događajima u fazi projektovanja, izgradnje i
otklanjanja nedostataka uključeni su u
prihvaćeni Ugovorni Iznos. Izvođač na
projektovanju i izgradnji ničim nije bio
limitiran u odabiru vrsta i količine geotehničkih
istraživanja; a u svrhu dobivanja što preciznijih
podataka o geotehničkoj sredini u kojoj se
nalazi temeljno tlo i tipu fundiranja mosta.
Nadzorni organ konstatuje da se pomenuti
radovi ne mogu tretirati kao nepredvidivi
radovi, uz obrazloženje da radovi mogu biti
predviđeni od strane iskusnog izvođača radova
iz dostavljenog Idejnog projekta.
Prema mišljenju Inženjera, riječ je o relativno
plitkim zonama deluvijalnog materijala
rasprostranjenog na manjim površinama
temeljnih stopa, a što bi trebalo biti predvidivo
od strane Iskusnog Izvođača.
Imajući na umu činjenicu da je Podizvođač
izvodio izgradnju mosta Suvovara, sa
Ugovorom baziranim na jediničnim količinama
izvedenih radova, a ne Projektovanje i
izgradnja, kao Ugovor Glavnog Izvođača,
prema mišljenju Inženjera, ovo potraživanje
nema činjenično ni ugovorno utemeljenje u
Ugovoru sa Investitorom.
Imajući na umu sve gore navedeno, mišljenje
Inženjera je da potraživanja Izvođača nisu
opravdana.
32