Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Audit Cash - Assertion - Procedure - Accountinguide
Audit Cash - Assertion - Procedure - Accountinguide
Menu
Audit Cash
Overview
Cash is usually an inherently risky asset on the balance sheet when we audit cash
accounts . This is due to cash may be inappropriately used without proper authorization
and wrong account or incorrect timing of record may be made involving in cash
transactions.
In the audit of cash, the inherent risk of cash is usually assessed as high risk because the
nature of cash has several risky elements such as high volume, high liquidity, automation
of transactions, debt covenants, high susceptibility of manipulation, etc.
In assessing the risk of fraud related to the cash, we need to consider how high the level
of client’s business, control and policy related to incentives, opportunities to commit fraud,
and rationalization.
For example, the staff having access to cash think they are being paid too low (incentive).
Cash is physically available to employees (opportunity). And top management takes cash
without proper recording of transactions (rationalization).
Rights and The company has title to the cash accounts as of the reporting
obligations date.
Valuation or The recorded balances reflect the true underlying economic value
allocation of the cash and cash equivalents.
In the audit of cash, we usually focus more on the existence and completeness assertions
as we concern more about whether the cash does actually exist and that cash
transactions that should have been recorded have actually been recorded.
Usually, after we assess the inherent and fraud risks of cash that could lead to
misstatements in financial statements, we will obtain an understanding of the control
system that the client has in place. This is to make sure if the client’s internal control is
effective in preventing or detecting the risks of material misstatements.
Also, it is very useful in the audit of petty cash this way. This is due to petty cash should
always be the same as the prior period. For example, in a normal circumstance, the petty
cash balance at the end of last period should be the same as the petty cash balance at the
end of the current period; it is because of the imprest system.
We usually discuss with the client’s management when there is any significant fluctuation
in the balances of cash comparing to the prior-period balances.
If there is a big difference between the actual figures and the budgeted figures, we need to
enquire management about the reasons behind. Additionally, the sampling size of the test,
for example in revenues transactions, may also need to be increased. This is so that we
make a better evaluation of whether there are any cash receipts that were not
appropriated leading to the misstatement.
The following procedures are usually performed for bank confirmation in audit cash:
Obtain written authority from the client to have in bank confirmation letter in order
for the bank to disclose the necessary information.
Send bank confirmation letter in a standard format to the bank
When the confirmation letter is received from the bank, check whether the bank has
answered all the questions requested for confirmation in the letter
Follow up all points in the bank letter
Bank Reconciliation
The client usually performs bank reconciliation at the end of the month by comparing the
cash balances on its bank statement with the cash balances in the accounting records. In
the procedures of audit cash, we usually review the bank reconciliation statement at the
year-end to make sure that client has taken into account all adjusting and reconciling
items, such as deposits in transit, outstanding check, and bank charges, into the bank
reconciliation. In addition, we also need to check and verify that the adjusted items have
been corrected recorded in the balance sheet.
Following procedures are usually used for bank reconciliation in audit cash:
Check and agree the balances per bank statement shown on the reconciliation to
the bank statement and to the balances shown on confirmation letter received from
the bank
Recasting the bank reconciliation to test arithmetic
Review the last period bank reconciliation to see whether they are cleared or carried
to the current period
Trace and verify the adjusting and reconciliation items, such as deposits in transit,
outstanding check, and bank charges to see if they are properly accounted for
Get a cutoff bank statement that shows the transactions after the end of the period
to trace and check on items such as deposits in transit and outstanding check to
see if they have been cleared after year-end
Verify that balances per accounting records shown on the reconciliation agree with
the general ledger account balance the year-end and that this has been properly
reflected in the financial statements.
Related Posts:
1. Substantive Audit Procedures
2. Risk of Material Misstatement for Cash
3. Audit Accounts Receivable
4. Audit Accounts Payable
5. Why Cash is High-Risk
Auditing
Property, Plant and Equipment
Behavioral Aspects of Budgeting
Search …
Categories
Auditing
Finance
Financial Accounting
Management Accounting
Auditing
Adverse Opinion
Analytical Procedures
Audit Adjustment
Audit Assertions
AUDIT CASH
Audit Debt
Audit Depreciation
Audit Documentation
Audit Evidence
Audit Expenses
Audit Inventory
Audit Investments
Audit Plan
Audit PPE
Audit Procedures
Audit Process
Audit Report
Audit Risk
Audit Sampling
Audit Strategy
Compliance Audit
Disclaimer of Opinion
External Audit
Group Audit
Internal Audit
Internal Control
Materiality in Audit
Misstatement in Audit
Negative Assurance
Negative Confirmation
Qualified Opinion
Review Engagement
Test of Controls
Tracing Audit
Types of Audit
Unqualified Opinion
Vouching Audit
Archives
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019