Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Govinda Chandra Mishra and A. Siva Reddy, A. M. Asce: J. Hydraul. Eng. 1983.109:897-904
By Govinda Chandra Mishra and A. Siva Reddy, A. M. Asce: J. Hydraul. Eng. 1983.109:897-904
ABSTRACT: The inclination of flow lines at the exit on the downstream side of
a hydraulic structure has been found for a known degree of anisotropy and a
given direction for the principal permeability. An analytical procedure is pre-
sented to find the exit gradient for steady confined flow in an anisotropic po-
rous medium from known exit gradient of the corresponding fictitious isotropic
flow domain. Results have been presented for distribution of exit gradient on
the downstream side of a vertical sheet pile embedded in a homogeneous an-
isotropic porous medium of infinite depth. It is found that the zone vulnerable
to piping on the downstream side of a vertical sheet pile is larger for the case
of horizontal stratification than for vertical stratification.
INTRODUCTION
Field and laboratory tests have indicated that most man-made and nat-
ural porous media exhibit directional variations in permeability (1-4,7,8).
The ratio of maximum to minimum coefficients of permeability—the de-
gree of anisotropy—is reported to be as high as 40 (10). A ratio of 2-4
is very common for natural soil deposits.
To analyze steady-state flow in an anisotropic homogeneous porous
medium, the flow domain is converted to an equivalent fictitious iso-
tropic domain by an appropriate coordinate transformation, and a so-
lution to the Laplace equation is sought in the fictitious flow domain.
Examples of this transformation process have been presented by De Wiest
(5), Harr (6), and Palubarinova-Kochina (11).
After obtaining the solution in the fictitious flow domain, either by
conformal mapping or by numerical methods, the solution correspond-
ing to the actual flow domain is obtained by a reverse transformation.
This procedure does not cause any difficulty in calculating pressure at
a point in the actual flow domain and the quantity of seepage, but the
exit gradient in the anisotropic flow domain cannot be obtained unless
the Laplace equation is solved either by drawing a flow net or by nu-
merical methods.
Verigin, as presented in Harr (6), has analyzed flow around an in-
clined sheet pile embedded in a homogeneous isotropic porous medium
of infinite depth by using conformal mapping. Using Verigin's solution,
only the pressure distribution along a vertical sheet pile in an anisotropic
'Reader, School of Hydrology, Univ. of Roorkee, Roorkee, India.
2
Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Hydr. Engrg., Indian Inst, of Sci., Bangalore, India.
Note.—Discussion open until November 1, 1983. To extend the closing date
one month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Manager of Technical
and Professional Publications. The manuscript for this paper was submitted for
review and possible publication on April 9, 1983. This paper is part of the Journal
of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 109, No. 6, June, 1983. ©ASCE, ISSN 0733-9429/
83/0006-0897/$01.00. Paper No. 18049.
897
mogeneous anisotropic flow domain from the exit gradient of the cor-
responding fictitious isotropic flow domain.
ANALYSIS
by the equation
Mfrf- <*>
The X and Y axes are chosen parallel and perpendicular, respectively,
to line OX which is the downstream bed alinement in the new or ficti-
tious domain.
Let point Q in Fig. 1 locate the unknown exit point of a flow line in
the anisotropic flow domain. P is a point on the flow line adjacent to
point Q. The direction of PQ is not known. P and Q = the corresponding
points in the fictitious isotropic flow domain. The direction of PQ is known
because PQ is the flow direction as well as the gradient direction which
is perpendicular to the downstream bed in the fictitious flow domain.
The component of the exit gradient in the direction of flow at the point,
Q, in the anisotropic flow domain is given byJiQ - hp/hS, in which hp
and HQ = the hydraulic heads at points P and Q, respectively, and 8S =
the elemental length along the flow line in the anisotropic media. The
total hydraulic head at any point is given by the expression h = P/yu, +
Y, in which p = pressure head; yw - unit weight of water; and Y =
elevation head. Since the total of heads at points P and Q equals the
total of heads at P and Q, respectively, the exit gradient in the fictitious
flow domain is given by HQ - hp/bS, in which 8S = the transformed
length of 8S.
From Fig. 1 the following expressions can be derived:
8S = [(8X)2 + (8Y)2]1/2 (5)
2 2 1/2
Also 8S = [(8|x) + Ni(8-n) J (6)
in which Nj = (K^/K^). The transformed length of 8S in the fictitious
plane is given by
8S = [(8,x)2 + (8^)2]1/2 (7)
The length 8S is equal to the length 8Y.
The ratio of the component of exit gradient along the flow direction
at a point in the actual flow domain to the exit gradient at the corre-
sponding point in the fictitious flow domain, R, is given by
ftp - hp
bS
R (8)
'(^M
V 8S
899
From Fig. 1, tan 8j = 8|A/8TI, in which bt = the angle between \i and the
X axis, and bi = tan - 1 (tan Q/yNi). Therefore
gradient starts from zero at the sheet pile, reaches a maximum value
and then decreases monotonicaUy, as the distance from the sheet pile
increases. Thus, for 90° < 6 < 180°, the zone which is vulnerable to
piping is away from the sheet pile and the danger of piping can be elim-
inated by increasing the length of embedment of the sheet pile. For 9 =
90° and 180°, the maximum exit gradient which occurs at the sheet pile
is independent of the degree of anisotropy. However, for 6 = 90°, the
exit gradient decreases rapidly near the sheet pile compared to the case
when 0 = 180° or 0°. More area is subjected to piping in case of hori-
zontal stratification.
Table 1 shows the inclination of streamlines for various degrees of an-
isotropy. As seen from the table, when 0 = 45°, and the degree of an-
isotropy is equal to 4, the streamlines make an angle of 59°, measured
clockwise, with the downstream bed. For a degree of anisotropy equal
to 40, the corresponding angle is 46.43°. Thus for an unchanging ori-
10 -2.12553 -0.32626
15 -1.60128 -0.37051
20 -1.40112 -0.44375
25 -1.33658 -0.53325
30 -1.34715 -0.63656
35 -1.40966 -0.75478
40 -1.51605 -0:89117
45 -1.66667 -1.05128
50 -1.86870 -1.24382
55 -2.13760 -1.48272
60 -2.50185 -1.79126
65 -3.01477 -2.21145
70 -3.78462 -2.82725
75 -5.06538 -3.83460
80 -7.62047 -5.82121
85 -15.26896 -11.72515
CONCLUSIONS
APPENDIX L—-REFERENCES
APPENDIX II.—NOTATION
904