Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study Paper 3 - Zack Peterson
Case Study Paper 3 - Zack Peterson
Ethicality in Marketing
Zack P. Peterson
Marketing: it’s a profession that has witnesses both good and bad behaviors from
organizations; much like the topic of our course, being organizational ethics. A formal definition
of the profession states, “Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating,
communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients,
partners, and society at large” (Market Business News, n.d.). In marketing, decisions have to be
made that can publicly showcase an organization’s point of view on the world and on their
business. Similarly, in ethics, decisions are made that show employees, clients, stakeholders, and
the world at large not only what their own point of view is, but why their view is the way that it
is. Through analyzing actual case studies and personal reflection, I bring my own point of view
The profession I will examine in my case study research is that of marketing. I have
chosen this profession for my research because this profession is one I will pursue once I earn
marketing is a profession that has had an impact throughout the majority of my life, whether I
was aware of it or not. My mom worked in marketing for real estate agencies in south Florida
when I was growing up, and within the past several years I’ve had the privilege and honor of
collaborating with a few of my favorite brands on creating imagery that would be used for their
own marketing, in both print and digital formats. In my position, as someone who is working on
obtaining a role in the marketing profession, how an organization advertises themselves can
show their ethicality to their peers, potential clients and stakeholders, as well as their competitors
within an industry. Ethics can be defined as, “[based on] well-founded standards of right and
wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to
society, fairness or specific virtues” (Velasquez, Andre, Shanks, S.J. and Meyer, 2010). From
working on the marketing end of an organization, you’re essentially sharing with the world every
minor detail, good or bad, about the organization – giving life to their story. Sharing that story
with others and working on ways to further challenge, enhance, and improve that story is a duty
My chosen profession is to work within the marketing industry. In that role, I will work
alongside others in sharing the ethical value and story behind a brand or company to both
consumers and stakeholders in a printed and/or digital context. The decision I made in my
background and having experience of working closely with brands on creating imagery myself
Here, I have chosen four case studies that, to me, exemplify the importance and necessity
of ethicality in marketing. Though each case study involves a situation that is different from one
another, each are a representation of likely dilemmas that can occur within the marketing
industry. In analyzing these four case studies, all will provide me with effective and useful
knowledge that I’ll be able to apply in my chosen profession to evoke a sense of ethicality in the
marketing industry.
Case Study 1: The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership (Tangdall, 2018)
The characters in this case study include two men from Philadelphia, the store manager of one
Starbucks location in downtown Philadelphia, Kevin Johnson, CEO of Starbucks, and the
Starbucks company as a whole. What happened in this particular event is that two men were
arrested for objecting to leave a Philadelphia Starbucks store after the store manager had asked
them to, for reason that was unbeknownst to them. Once video from the smartphone of a
customer inside of this Starbucks location had surfaced, the incident was perceived as an act of
discrimination based upon the gentlemen’s race. Kevin Johnson, CEO of Starbucks, made a
public apology promptly after their arrest, stating that the actions that had taken place in the
5
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
Starbucks store do not align with the company’s values or integrity. He then flew to Philadelphia
from Seattle to meet with the two gentlemen who were arrested to discuss ways in which
Starbucks, as a company, can improve their conduct and ethics policies. The decisions that were
made include temporarily closing several thousand Starbucks locations here in the U.S. for two
hours so that employees are able to partake in racial bias training. as well as learn the company’s
new policy that entails patrons who visit a Starbucks store, whether they’re a paying customer or
not, may use the space and its amenities to their advantage under certain circumstances. These
decisions were ethical dilemmas due to the fact that the general public, whether a customer or
non, believed that having employees undergo a racial bias training session was simply not
enough to resolve the situation. The result of these decisions were made to prove to the general
public that Starbucks is a company that prides itself on being a part of everyone’s community, no
matter how big or how small, and one who works to accommodate everyone.
I chose this ethical dilemma case study because I work as a barista at a Starbucks store outside of
Nashville, Tennessee, so this event affected me rather deeply on a personal level. Working for
Starbucks, as a gay man within the LGBTQI+ community, who also lives in a state that’s vastly
conservative, this was a controversial subject among customers and my fellow partners; one that
was avoided at all costs. I feel that understanding this ethical dilemma in my industry/profession,
being marketing, is necessary for my leadership development because this is a very serious issue
that cannot be handled lightly. In terms of a marketing standpoint, the company wants to publicly
address this issue to customers in a way that best features their personal beliefs and rights, being
in opposition with the incident that took place. This wasn’t a publicity stunt to gain attention
towards the company, this was a modern-day example that racist behaviors still occur to this day
6
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
and we, as a company with a large platform, will not accept or condone this behavior to take
The characters in this case study include the company Facebook, their own company researchers,
clients with various services and/or products who use Facebook for advertisement, and those
within the five mentioned countries who use Facebook. What happened in this particular event is
researchers for Facebook examined the behavior displayed by users on the social media platform
when they’re undergoing a relational breakup, using that examined data to the advantage of their
clients when it comes to advertisement space, then later on posting their findings in a post on the
platform’s blog. The options that were made include research into the online activity of
Facebook users when they’re experiencing a breakup, both before and after the breakup happens,
and brainstorming on ways in which brands or companies who use Facebook for ad space can
include themselves in the user’s breakup journey, whether it’s a product that can create a new
hobby or a service that can create a new experience for the user. The decisions that were made
include using targeted advertisements that show empathy to the user and condone them to travel
or pick up a new hobby that will help them get out of their breakup rut – hence, giving these
brands or companies their own money via an ad. These decisions were ethical dilemmas because
Facebook had essentially used their users for their own financial gain with advertising clients. By
conducting this examination, researchers for Facebook were monitoring users during a
vulnerable point in the users’ lives to see how their paying clients could manage their way into
the lives of many. The result of these decisions, once the blog post had been published for the
general public to read, Facebook users were quick to judge that this research study violated their
7
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
ethical rights, among other ethical qualities that pertain to how we use the social media platform
I chose this ethical dilemma case study because it’s a case that is very much prevalent in our
current society. We’re living in the age of technology, where there are constant advancements or
new additions that are being incorporated into the way we live our everyday lives, and while it is
exciting to witness and take part in it ourselves, that engagement comes at a bit of a cost.
Because of how advanced technology is, there’s practically no sense of privacy we have
anymore. Everything that goes on in our day-to-day is being shared, analyzed, recorded and
publicized, and sometimes even without our notice or approval. What caught my attention about
this ethical dilemma is how specific this case study was; it only involved a certain group of
Facebook users and went into great detail about how we’re sort of blindly unaware of the ways
in which we interact with the platform. I feel as though, after the blog post had been published, it
made those who read it more conscious of the degree to which they use Facebook and showed to
them that they’re exposing themselves to more than what they know. I feel that understanding
because it shows me the length at which when marketers can go too far. Having your ads
displayed throughout Facebook is a common practice; however, having your ads strategically
and timely placed in one’s account, where it could be perceived as unjust, is another practice. In
my leadership development, two qualities have become a newly set standard to achieve success:
behaving ethically and fairly. For me, I feel that this case study goes against that standard, which
makes it informative to know when and where to set the limit when marketing a brand within the
The characters in this case study include a candidate for the state Senate, her opponent for state
Senate, the current-sitting Governor of the state, public citizens, and a local reporter. What
happened in this particular event is our main candidate, in which this case study is about,
released a campaign brochure that included a photo of her in what appears to be the formal office
of an office holder. Once the brochure was obtained by the public, some public citizens made
note of the uncanny resemblance in the photo’s setting to that of the Governor’s office, down to
the framed photographs of the Governor’s family and even a bowl of jelly beans, which are
apparently favored by the Governor. The Governor then denied the accusation that he allowed
the candidate to be photographed in his office, saying that he does not endorse her, or anyone for
that matter, for State senate and that the purpose of the office is not for a photo shoot. The
opponent, however, came to his own conclusion that the photograph had been digitally altered
from an existing photography of the Governor to replace the him. With his assertion, he
approached a local reporter to run the story. The candidate then went on to say that the photo
could have been taken while she was a citizen volunteer who had visited the Governor’s office
many times and that she had no knowledge of the digital alteration, if any. She also stated that
the story from her opponent’s perspective takes attention away from serious matters that should
be faced. These decisions were ethical dilemmas because they ultimately tested the integrity of
the candidate, which subjected her to a false portrayal by the public. While the case study doesn’t
share any further details of what happened next, the result of these decisions that were made
from what’s mentioned of the case study led to questioning from the public of whether she’s a
I chose this ethical dilemma case study because instances such as this, where a picture really is
worth a thousand words, have happened one too many a time. What caught my attention about
this ethical dilemma, aside from the title of the case study, is how one mistake can really make or
break one’s career. In this case, choosing to print a photo in a brochure that’s about you and your
campaign, and you aren’t aware of the clearly visible error in one of the photos, is somewhat
telling of the type of term she would be serving as State senator. I feel that understanding this
is so crucial to have an accurate representation of who and what you are. Whether you’re a self-
owned business or someone working for a large corporation, marketing yourself or the company
you’re working for with imagery that is a genuine portrayal of the business you’re behind is
imperative, now more than ever. With social media being a large generator of business for
brands, putting photos out into the digital space that reflect what the business is about will help
create or enhance your following. As someone who has worked with brands on creating imagery
to use for campaigns or social media use, there really is an intense pressure in making sure that
The characters in this case study are three CEOs of well-known companies: Brendan Eich of the
internet browser Mozilla, Dov Charney of clothing retailer American Apparel, and Evan Spiegel
of the social media app Snapchat. What happened in this particular event is the telling of the
backstory of three CEOs to three different, well-known companies, both here in the States and
around the world, and how their individual integrity did not align with the integrity that was
10
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
shared as a company to consumers and stakeholders. For Brendan Eich, his support towards the
Defense of Marriage Act, which exclusively defined marriage as being between one man and one
woman, went against Mozilla’s own values of openness and bringing people together from
around the world. Due to his personal beliefs, he resigned as CEO of the company in April of
2014. Dov Charney of American Apparel violated the company’s sexual harassment policy, as
well as mishandling company funds, which completely went against their ethos of ethical
practices within the industry they existed in. Ultimately, because of his reoccurring inappropriate
behavior, he was let go as CEO of the company and removed from the board as chairman in
2014. In the case of Evan Spiegel from Snapchat, emails from Spiegel’s time in college, which
wasn’t long after the launch of the photo and video sharing app, were released to the public
media, showing his offensive use of language and behavior towards women, mention of
underage drinking and illegal drug use, and even showed nods of racism. After the release of
these emails, Spiegel made a public apology, saying that his college years are not an accurate
representation of the person he is today; today, he still resides in the role as the company’s CEO.
The options that were made in this case study, spanning across three individual cases, include
possible termination of the current-sitting CEOs, at that time; yet, the decisions that were made
varied depending on the case. One CEO resigned himself from the company, another was let go
completely, and the third CEO is still the current-sitting CEO today. These were ethical
dilemmas because the CEOs broke ethical conduct, whether prior to or during their time as CEO,
to their consumers and stakeholders and essentially profited off of empty promises made by the
company as a whole. The result of these decisions varied depending on the individual case,
although, the overall consensus is that transparency from both ends of the organization – CEO
I chose this ethical dilemma case study because, even though these cases originally happened
several years ago, this type of uncovering of the people that are behind these well-known
companies is just as relevant now as it was then. Transparency and integrity have become a
generously used terms by companies lately, and it’s for good reason. We, as consumers and/or
stakeholders, want to know exactly what we’re investing our time and money into and who we’re
involving ourselves with along the way. It seems as though these days, if a large corporation or
small brand wants to have a successful go in the industry, they have to be just as open to sharing
themselves and their business with us as we are in opening our wallets and ourselves with them.
With transparency and integrity comes trust, and trust is not as easily earned as it used to be.
What caught my attention about this ethical dilemma was how similar it was to the “Bots”
scenario in Level 5 of our simulation game. Because we live in a time where it’s easy to say or
do one thing when you really say or do another, there has to be a high level of accountability and
truthfulness placed on those who are leading companies, no matter the company’s size. I feel that
development because it proves the fact that what you’re putting out into the world has to a true
representation of what you are and who you are. The integrity and intention behind an
organization is traced back to the person, or persons, who established it, so there has to be
genuine and authentic to who they are. For me, in my opinion, it’s unethical to bank on empty
Based on what I have collected from my case study analysis, the general consensus that
can be made about these case studies is that there lacks a sense of ethicality in the marketing
analyzing of what was done versus what could have been done to achieve a more ethical
approach in each case study. In my first discussed case study, dealing with Kevin Johnson, CEO
of Starbucks, and the incident that took place in one Philadelphia Starbucks store, what could be
inferred there is that Johnson took an unethical situation and turned it into a lesson learned as to
how Starbucks can grow progressively towards creating a more welcoming and accepting
culture, but at the cost of the arrest of two, innocent men. The second discussed case study,
highlighting the fact that Facebook took advantage of its users in five different countries for the
benefit of the company’s advertisement clients, inferred that it is unjust to sell the information of
your consumers to your ad clients in order to make a profit. My third discussed case study, which
focused on a photograph used by a candidate for the state Senate that stirred some controversy,
solidified the saying that a picture is worth a thousand words, and inferred that it’s crucial to
ensure that your own picture is representative of who you are. In my fourth discussed case study,
one that reveals the truth behind the lives of three CEOs, the inference made there is that
From the inferences that were made in my case study analysis and from what I have
learned about ethics in the course so far, the bridge to be gapped between marketing and ethical
behavior is not far apart from each other. For instance, a concept from our textbook that relates
to my chosen profession is virtue theory. Of the theory, Fryer goes into detail, saying, “It focuses
on personal qualities, or virtues, that an ethical person needs to have. In the context of business
13
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
ethics, then, virtue theory helps us to think about what it is for a business or a businessperson to
be ethical” (Fryer, p. 172). In that same regard, our Planet Jockey simulation game has also
contributed to my understanding of how marketing and ethical behavior are more similar than
they are different. Throughout my time spent going through each level of the game, concepts and
accountability, intention, and facing bad press. From engaging with those concepts, I was able to
relate that learning to my inferences from the case studies and possess a thorough understanding
as to why it’s important for me to know this information to enhance my leadership development.
14
ETHICALITY IN MARKETING
Conclusion
In conclusion, the marketing industry is not a perfect one, nor is any industry for that
matter. There aren’t as many ethical standards put into place as there should be, although, I
believe that in due time there will be a shift in the way organizations market themselves to
consumers, stakeholders, and the public at large. With accountability, truthfulness, transparency,
and integrity becoming more prevalent as society continues to grow and evolve, the expectation
for organizations to adhere to those concepts will seem second nature. From the learning material
I engaged with throughout the course, in both our textbook and simulation game, as well as the
case studies I selected to emphasize the necessity of ethical behavior in marketing, I genuinely
feel prepared to take on the marketing industry and incorporate my learned skills about ethics to
Callaghan, H. (2015). The Case of the Questionable Campaign Photo. Retrieved from
https://www.scu.edu/government-ethics/resources/the-case-of-the-questionable-
campaign-photo/
Fryer, M. (2014). Ethics Theory and Business Practice. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE
Publications.
Market Business News. (n.d.). What Is Marketing? Definition and Meaning. Retrieved from
https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/marketing-definition-meaning/
areas/internet-ethics/resources/targeting-a-broken-heart/
areas/business-ethics/resources/case-on-executive-integrity/
Tangdall, S. (2018). The CEO of Starbucks and the Practice of Ethical Leadership. Retrieved
from https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/leadership-ethics/resources/the-ceo-of-
starbucks-and-the-practice-of-ethical-leadership/
Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Thomas, S., S.J., Meyer, M. J. (2010). What is Ethics? Retrieved from
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/what-is-ethics/