Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Antimony Tri-Oxide Test Report (08.10.2020)

    Uploaded by

    jamil
    15 views1 page
    This document compares the quality of antimony tri-oxide from two different companies against an ASTM standard through oxygen index testing. The testing found that Dongguan Jiefu Flame-retarded Material Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide did not meet the standard requirements, with an oxygen index of 144 and burning period of 126 seconds, below the minimum values of 180 seconds. In contrast, Hebei Xuerun Biological Technology Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide met the standard, with values of 210 and 215 seconds respectively. The note concludes that Dongguan Jiefu's antimony tri-oxide quality is unacceptable.

    Original Description:

    Antimony Tri-Oxide Test Report (08.10.2020)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the quality of antimony tri-oxide from two different companies against an ASTM standard through oxygen index testing. The testing found that Dongguan Jiefu Flame-retarded Material Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide did not meet the standard requirements, with an oxygen index of 144 and burning period of 126 seconds, below the minimum values of 180 seconds. In contrast, Hebei Xuerun Biological Technology Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide met the standard, with values of 210 and 215 seconds respectively. The note concludes that Dongguan Jiefu's antimony tri-oxide quality is unacceptable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    15 views1 page

    Antimony Tri-Oxide Test Report (08.10.2020)

    Uploaded by

    jamil
    This document compares the quality of antimony tri-oxide from two different companies against an ASTM standard through oxygen index testing. The testing found that Dongguan Jiefu Flame-retarded Material Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide did not meet the standard requirements, with an oxygen index of 144 and burning period of 126 seconds, below the minimum values of 180 seconds. In contrast, Hebei Xuerun Biological Technology Co. Ltd.'s antimony tri-oxide met the standard, with values of 210 and 215 seconds respectively. The note concludes that Dongguan Jiefu's antimony tri-oxide quality is unacceptable.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    COMPARISON TEST REPORT OF ANTIMONI TRI-OXIDE (Sb2O3)

    BETWEEN DONGGUAN JIEFU FLAME-RETARDED METERIAL CO. LTD.


    & HEBEI XUERUN BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD.

    Ref. Standard: ASTM D 2863-00 Date: 08.10.2020


    Sl. Testing Item Unit Standard Found Value
    No. Value

    HEBEI XUERUN DONGGUAN JIEFU


    BIOLOGICAL FLAME-RETARDED
    TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. MATERIAL CO. LTD.
    Existing (Sb2O3) New (Sb2O3)

    01 Oxygen Index Test: 210 144


    Period of Burning after Ignition Sec ≥180
    (Test Method A: Top Surface 215 126
    Ignition)

    Note: The quality of Dongguan Jiefu Flame-retarded Material Co. Ltd. antimony tri-oxide (sb2o3) is not
    acceptable.

    Tested By, Checked By,

    Md. Jamil Sharif Md. Iqbal Hasan


    Asst. Engr. (QC) Asst. Manager (QC)

    You might also like