Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gandionco Vs Penaranda PDF
Gandionco Vs Penaranda PDF
Facts:
May 29, 1986 – Teresita Gandionco, wife of petitioner, filed with the RTC of Misamis Oriental, presided over by respondent
judge, Judge Senen Peñaranda, a petition for legal separation on the ground of concubinage.
October 13, 1986 – Teresita filed a criminal case for concubinage against her husband.
November 14, 1986 – Teresita filed for a provisional remedy of support pendente lite.
December 10, 1986 – Respondent Judge ordered the payment of Pendente Lite.
Petitioner contends the order of the judge, saying, that, the course of the civil action, in this case, Legal Separation, is tied
with the criminal charge, in this case, concubinage. Thus any action on the civil case should be postponed until the criminal
case, on which it is based, is finalized.
Family Code - Art. 55. A petition for legal separation may be filed on any of the following grounds:
(8) Sexual infidelity or perversion;
1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure - Art. III. Sec. 3. Other Civil action arising from offenses. — Whenever the offended party
shall have instituted the civil action to enforce the civil liability arising from the offense. as contemplated in the first Section 1
hereof, the following rules shall be observed:
(a) After a criminal action has been commenced the pending civil action arising from the same offense shall be suspended, in
whatever stage it may be found, until final judgment in the criminal proceeding has been rendered. . . .
Issues:
Whether or not Legal Separation on the grounds of concubinage of requires the finding guilty of concubinage of the same?
Decision:
Petition Denied.
Held Ratio
1. Legal Separation on the grounds of Concubinage does not A decree of legal separation, on the ground of concubinage, may
require that the husband be found guilty of the same. be issued upon proof by preponderance of evidence in the
action for legal separation. No criminal proceeding or
conviction is necessary.