Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Layugan v. IAC
Layugan v. IAC
Layugan v. IAC
*
No. L-73998. No embe 14, 1988.
Re ed a La ; C P ced e; E de ce; T e e a e
d ac eC A ea a e e ed ea e ec
a d d a be d bed e b e; b ec
e e ab ed e ce . Indeed, i i an elemen a le in
he e ie of deci ion of he Co of A eal ha i finding of
fac a e en i led o g ea e ec and ill no o dina il be
di bed b hi Co . Fo if e ha e o e ie e e e ion of
fac ele a ed o , e o ld ha dl ha e an mo e ime lef fo
he eigh ie i e com elling and de e ing o efe en ial
a en ion. Be ha a i ma , hi le i no infle ible. S el
he e a e e abli hed e ce ion hen he Co ho ld e ie
and ec if he finding of fac of he lo e co , ch a : 1) hen
he concl ion i a finding g o nded en i el on ec la ion,
mi e, o conjec e; 2) he infe ence made i manife l
mi aken; 3) he e i g a e ab e of di c e ion; 4) he j dgmen i
ba ed on mi a ehen ion of fac ; 5) he Co of A eal en
be ond he i e of he ca e if he finding a e con a o he
admi ion of bo h he a ellan and he a ellee; 6) he finding
of fac of he Co of A eal a e con a o ho e of he ial
co ; 7) he aid finding of fac a e concl ion i ho ci a ion
of ecific e idence on hich he a e ba ed; 8) he fac e fo h
in he e i ion a ell a in he e i ione ' main and e l b ief
a e no di ed b he e onden ; and 9) hen he finding of
fac of he Co of A eal a e emi ed on he ab ence of
e idence and a e con adic ed on eco d.
C La ; T a d Da a e ; Ne e ce, De ed; T e
e e ce e e ce a e ca e de e ed b e
e a d e e ac a e a ; I e a
a de e e
________________
* SECOND DIVISION.
364
La a .I e ed a e A e aeC
365
La a .I e ed a e A e aeC
366
La a .I e ed a e A e aeC
negligence on he a of he ma e o em lo e ei he in he
elec ion of he e an o em lo ee, o in e i ion o e him
af e elec ion, o bo h. S ch e m ion i j i an m and no
j i e de j e and con e en l , ma be eb ed. If follo
nece a il ha if he em lo e ho o he a i fac ion of he
co ha in he elec ion and in he e i ion he ha e e ci ed
he ca e and diligence of a good fa he of a famil , he
e m ion i o e come and he i elie ed f om liabili . In
di claiming liabili fo he inciden , he i a e e onden
e e ha he negligence of hi em lo ee ha al ead been
ade a el o e come b hi d i e ' a emen ha he kne hi
e on ibili ie a a d i e and ha he ck o ne ed o
in c him o be ca ef l in d i ing.
SARMIENTO, J.:
A ailed1 in hi e i ion fo e ie on ce io a i a 2e 1) he
deci ion of he hen In e media e A ella e Co in AC-
G.R. CV No. 01055, en i led "Ped o T. La gan, Plain iff-
A ellee, e Godof edo I id o, Defendan -A ellan
and Thi d-Pa Plain iff-A ellee, e T a elle
M l i-Indemni Co o a ion, Thi d Pa Defendan
3
-
A ellan , " hich e e ed and e a ide he deci ion of
he Regional T ial Co , Thi d J dicial Region, B anch
XXVI, Cabana an Ci , and al o di mi ed he com lain ,
hi d a com lain , and
4
he co n e claim of he a ie
and 2) he e ol ion den ing he lain iff-a ellee'
(he ein e i ione ) mo ion fo econ ide a ion,
_______________
367
fo lack of me i .
The finding of fac b he ial co 5
hich e e
ado ed b he a ella e co a e a follo d:
_______________
36
36
o i ion.
F om he e idence e en ed, i ha been e abli hed clea l
ha he inj ie ained b he lain iff a ca ed b
defendan ' d i e , Daniel Se ano. The olice e o confi med
he allega ion of he lain iff and admi ed b Daniel Se ano on
c o -e amina ion. The colli ion di lodged he jack f om he
a ked ck and inned he lain iff o he g o nd. A a e l
he eof, lain iff ained inj ie on hi lef fo ea m and lef
foo . The lef leg of he lain iff f om belo he knee a la e on
U on ch finding , am l o ed b he e idence on
eco d, he ial co ende ed
6
i deci ion, he di o i i e
a of hich ead a follo :
_______________
370
_______________
9 Rollo, 108.
10 The E ec i e Sec e a , e al. . CA, G.R. No. L-37999, J ne 10,
1988, ci ing Chan . CA, G.R. No. L-27488, J ne 30, 1970, 33 SCRA 737;
Lianga Ba Logging Co., Inc. . CA, G.R. No. L-37783, Jan a 28,1988.
11 Ande on Co., e al. . IAC, G.R. No. L-65928, J ne 21,1988.
12 Di ec o of Land . CA, G.R. No. L-46068, Se embe 30, 1982, 117
SCRA 346, ci ing Macadangdang . CA, No. L-49542, Se embe 12,1980,
100 SCRA 73; Mane o . CA, G.R. No. L-49824, Feb a 20,1981; 102
SCRA 817; Pio L. Padilla . C.A., Jan a 29,1988; G.R. 75577, Jan a
29,1988; M nici ali of Me ca a an, B lacan . IAC, G.R. L-72126,
Jan a 29,1988.
371
_______________
372
_______________
373
_______________
374
_______________
375
_______________
376
_______________
377
38
doc ine i no a le of b an i e la b 39 me el a
mode of oof o a me e oced al con enience. The le,
hen a licable o he fac and ci c m ance of a
a ic la ca e, i no in ended o and doe no di en e
i h he e i emen of oof40 of c l able negligence on he
a of he a cha ged. I me el de e mine and
eg la e ha hall be a ac e e idence he eof and
facili a e he b 41den of lain iff of o ing a b each of he
d of d e ca e. The doc ine can be in oked hen and
onl hen, nde he ci c m ance in42 ol ed, di ec
e idence i ab en and no eadil a ailable. Hence, i ha
gene all been held ha he e m ion of infe ence
a i ing f om he doc ine canno be a ailed of, o i
o e come, he e lain iff ha kno ledge and e ifie o
e en e idence a o he ecific ac of negligence hich
i he ca e of he inj com lained of o he e he e i
di ec e idence a o he eci e ca e of he acciden and
all he fac and 43
ci c m ance a endan on he occ ence
clea l a ea . Finall , once he ac al ca e of inj i
e abli hed be ond con o e , he he b he lain iff o
b he defendan , no e m ion ill be in ol ed and he
doc ine become ina licable hen he ci c m ance
ha e been o com le el el dica ed ha no infe ence of
defendan ' liabili can 44
ea onabl be made, ha e e he
o ce of he e idence, a in hi ca e.
. . . / / /0000017481 644 908 3 39003600 002 009 / /? =F 16/19
9/12/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED OLUME 167
_______________
38 Id., 527.
39 Id., 529.
40 Id., 529-530.
41 Id., 530.
42 Id., 543-544.
43 Id., 544-545.
44 Id., 548.
37
follo nece a il ha if he em lo e ho o he
a i fac ion of he co ha in he elec ion and in he
e i ion he ha e e ci ed he ca e and diligence of a
good fa he of a famil , he45 e m ion i o e come and
he i elie ed f om liabili . In di claiming liabili fo he
inciden , he i ae e onden e e ha he
negligence of hi em lo ee ha al ead been ade a el
o e come b hi d i e ' a emen ha he kne hi
e on ibili ie a a d i e and ha he 46
ck o ne ed
o in c him o be ca ef l in d i ing.
We do no ag ee i h he i a e e onden in hi
bmi ion. In he fi lace, i i clea ha he d i e did
no kno hi e on ibili ie beca e he a a en l did no
check hi ehicle befo e he ook i on he oad. If he did he
co ld ha e di co e ed ea lie ha he b ake fl id i e on
he igh a c , and co ld ha e e ai ed i and h he
acciden co ld ha e been a oided. Mo eo e , o o mind,
he fac ha he i a e e onden ed o in c hi
d i e o be ca ef l in hi d i ing, ha he d i e a
licen ed, and he fac ha he had no eco d of an acciden ,
a fo nd b he e onden co , a e no fficien o
de o he finding of negligence of he Regional
47
T ial
Co gi en he fac e abli hed a he ial The i a e
. . . / / /0000017481 644 908 3 39003600 002 009 / /? =F 17/19
9/12/2020 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED OLUME 167
_______________
37
Pe a ed.
o0o
C 2020 C B S ,I .A .