Jhed Marvin D.

Saulog
BIT12

Bonifacio’s Philosophy

It is broadly realized that Bonifacio was in favor of a bloody revolution, in spite of the fact that
before he established the Katipunan, he joined La Liga Filipina. It may be the case that Bonifacio
had supported confidence in the tranquil developmental advancement of the country which the
Liga wanted. At the point when Rizal was captured, detained at Fort Santiago, and ousted to
Dapitan, Bonifacio was persuaded that the answer for the country's issues was not changes but
rather a vicious insurgency. It took ten years—pretty much—before reformists like Graciano
Lopez Jaena, Marcelo H. del Pilar, and Antonio Luna understood that autonomy through an
equipped upset was a definitive answer for the general population's troubles. It was possible that
Bonifacio originally held the view of launching the revolution first before instituting reforms. He
may have just assumed the best about to serene methods in accomplishing the country's
advancement. At the point when the method for harmony fizzled, he was persuaded that the main
choice left was upheaval. In spite of the fact that he kept being an individual from the Liga after
Rizal's extradition to Dapitan in help for the proceeded with activity of La Solidaridad in Spain,
Bonifacio had already founded the Katipunan on 7 July 1892. Bonifacio’s philosophy of
revolution can be gleaned from his manifesto, “Ang dapat mabatid ng mga Tagalog,” which
appeared in the Katipunan newspaper, Kalayaan. I would state that Bonifacio's logic of upset is
unmistakably unique in that Bonifacio was the first to plan a reasoning of insurgency dependent
on the point of view of two racially extraordinary contracting people groups; that Bonifacio's
message on the unrest was national in expectation yet ancestral in the underlying execution since
he, as a Tagalog, needed to make fundamentally a progressive center among the Tagalogs initial;
that his theory of transformation as a significant scholarly work fits in well with the
understanding that Bonifacio was an ilustrado or on the other hand scholarly; that the Katipunan
as a progressive society or development is a greater amount of an outline of a history from the
center instead of a history from above or a history from underneath since the working class ran
the development and therefore coordinated the unrest; that Bonifacio utilized as progressive
system the pasyon thought of a lost heaven preceding colonization to be recuperated by his age;
and that Bonifacio certainly considered his agitational work, at whatever expenses and means,
including purposeful mistranslations, as reliable with his progressive logic.
Jhed Marvin D. Saulog
BIT12

Jacinto’s Philosophy

I have seen that his standards fixated on social justice and equality. He believed that we are
altogether brought into the world equivalent; subsequently one must not persecute his fellowmen
and rather, must guard the abused from their oppressors. He had his own adaptation of the
Golden Rule, which is to not do unto the group of your neighbor what you don't need others to
do unto yours. For him, a man's societal position, race or position does not characterize an
individual's value and esteem. What characterizes him is his activities and works, regardless of
whether he "does great, keeps his words, is commendable and honest,and adores and treasures
his mother country." In his "Liwanag at Dilim", his political and furthermore moral belief
systems and methods of insight that were packed in the Cartilla have been expounded and
clarified further. In "Liberty and Glitter", he reprimanded how men will in general be
hoodwinked by the "light" of some who utilizes their bogus light to hide their foul play as
opposed to following and trusting the real "light" that shows itself unhesitatingly and with
genuineness. In "Liberty", his look for social equity was emphasized. He scrutinized the way
some maltreatment their freedom while denying others of their own, and keep on enabling
themselves by subjugating and abusing others. It is trailed by "All Men Are Equal" which
obviously discusses social balance and how everybody must be dealt with reasonably and
similarly paying little mind to their race, blood, or social class. In the part entitled "Love", he
examined love as identified with one's affection for his fellowman. He trusted that it is the sort of
affection which drives us to scan for equity and the benefit of all. Shockingly, this isn't what
dependably wins for certain men, as indicated by Jacinto; some are asked by their self-
centeredness which leaves the others manhandled and persecuted by the devilish ones. In
"Deception", he recognized the way that many, and I surmise particularly the general population
in Church around then, don't generally go about as Christ has instructed us to do as such;
subsequently the general population who trusted them had a false or dazzle conviction. In
conclusion, in "The People and the Government", he accentuated the significance of keeping the
parity of intensity between the administration and the general population represented. We can see
that Jacinto needed a majority rule society wherein the administration has the obligation to
dependably consider the will and prosperity of the natives and to lead its kin towards
"satisfaction" and the benefit of all. As per him, the welfare of the general population is and
ought to be the sole motivation behind the administration and the legislature ought to owe its
reality to the general population. It can't get away from the notice of any reasonable individual
that Emilio Jacinto had been a wonderful man. Observing his extremely youthful age, he was at
that point ready to have his very own methods of insight of how man should act and think and
how a general public must be. His works clearly demonstrates his shrewdness and the clearness
and sharpness of his psyche. Numerous among his thoughts can be contrasted with the
philosophies of acclaimed logicians and scholars and his works are, somehow or another,
proposing what a perfect society or man ought to be and how to accomplish it. It had been a
reflection and result of the political circumstance of the Philippines at that point, yet I can say
that it is still especially material up to now.