Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IP Meru University
IP Meru University
A. Introduction
Intellectual property (IP) recognizes, rewards, protects and promotes creativity - the product of the
mind. It can also facilitate access to the products of innovation and creativity by the public.
Allocating IPRs to the creator of a work balances the private interests of the creator, by ensuring
that s/he still has an incentive to create, against those of the society at large in having the
information available for its use.
Even though it does not diminish once it is shared, the role of IPRs is to ensure that information
providers do not lose rights to the information by disclosing it, since such information can be used
by an infinite number of persons simultaneously. Indeed, one of the philosophic underpinnings of
IPRs is to ensure disclosure of the information, the assumption being that lack of such right would
discourage information holders from sharing their information for fear of losing it. The fear of
losing exclusive rights to the information once shared is real because another person can use the
same idea without having recourse to the originator of the idea
B. Philosophy Of Property Ownership In The Western World
There are two schools of thought inform the Western philosophy to property ownership.
• The deontological school teaches that a person has a natural right to a person’s creation
irrespective of the consequences. Hereunder, an inventor is rewarded for working hard.
The main proponent of this scholar John Locke (1632-1704) tried to link natural rights to
a theory of property. Locke propounds that God gave the earth to mankind in common and
that each individual has ‘property’ in his/her own ‘person’ and the ‘labour’ of his/her body
and the ‘work’ of his/her hands. Indeed, with respect to IPRs, the production of ideas comes
from a person’s labour, the ideas themselves coming from a commons without getting
exhausted and that ideas can become property without being wasteful. Hence, those who
sacrifice to ‘labour’ should be rewarded with property rights.
• The consequentialist/utilitarian school (first propagated by Jeremy Bentham :1748-1832)
holds that IPRs are seen as an incentive to further technological advancement. IPRs are
thus granted to ensure that enough intellectual products are available to the larger
society….focus in the use not so much on the individual
In summary, John Locke ( natural rights theory) posits that the results of an individual’s labour
and ideas were part and parcel of his identity and were inalienable. Over time, this theory declined
in influence and a more utilitarian one influenced by Bentham took hold. Under the more current
utilitarian theory, patent rights are seen as creations by society for the purpose of serving the
economic interests of the society as a whole. This theory is premised on rewarding for their
creativity (incentives and rewards)—that creators are encouraged to invent by the promise of a
reward in the form of monopoly rights over their creation for a limited amount of time.
Put differently, it should be appreciated that the Western philosophy of property ownership (both
Lockean and Utilitarianism) emphasize individual ownership of property. It is the individual, who
would have worked out an idea who is then accorded exclusive rights to property.