Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Powertrain Design Report
Powertrain Design Report
DIFFERENTIAL
The options available were: Open differential,
Limited Slips Differential (LSD) and Spool system
(no differential). Open differentials were plot showing top speed (left)and grade-
discarded because they have a chance of getting ability(right). Grade-ability is 33 degrees and
stuck in muddy terrains. LSDs solve the problem top speed is 57kmph.
of open differentials but are complex and
relatively difficult to design and manufacture. Thus, the gearbox reduction ratio was finalized
Thus, spool drive was the best option because it with an iterative process in which four
would not have the problem of open conditions were set:
differentials and would not be difficult to design
1. Minimum angle that can be climbed
or manufacture. However, since a spool drive
should be 33 degrees
would cause problems while turning, it was
2. Top speed should not exceed 60 kmph
decided that the suspension geometry is
as per guidelines
designed such that the significant lateral mass
transfer would occur while turning. This would
3. At maximum reduction ratio, traction complete the run in less time. Whereas in hill
on the road should not be lost climbing or suspension traction event more
4. During acceleration on a grade of 30 torque is required for most of the time to
degrees, the vehicle should not topple ascend the slope and for traction. Engine speed
backward and CVT ratio play the largest roles in achieving
After several iterations, the reduction desired vehicle dynamics, but the regulatory
ratio was calculated to be 8.89:1. components of the transmission make it all
possible and adjustable.
GEARBOX HOUSING DESIGN The procedure for CVT tuning starts with the
programming in Arduino Uno for measurement
The material of the housing was decided as of rpm of the driver and driven pulley
6061-T6 Aluminum because of its high strength respectively. Infrared sensors are used for this
to weight ratio. A preliminary design was purpose. The program returns the computed
prepared with a thickness of 5mm. rpm.
Forces due to gears on the housing were The above procedure is performed for the
calculated by applying basic moment balance different combinations of flyweight’s mass and
equations. Using finite element analysis, the the spring rate. There is a total of 4
housing was iteratively optimized, and the final combinations as there are 2 different masses of
design was prepared. flyweights and 2 different springs. The
measured engine rpm is plotted against the CVT
ratio.
BEARING SELECTION
It can be inferred from the graph that 275g
Due to the pressure angle of teeth on meshing flyweight gives more torque than the 250g
gears, forces are transferred to the gear shaft in flyweight whereas it is the other way around in
two directions. For this purpose, bearings were the case of speed.
studied, and fatigue life calculations were done
as per the SKF Bearing standards. All the
bearings were selected according to these
calculations and it was ensured that the load
ratings of the bearings were enough so that
they would not fail for 500 hours of running at
maximum rotational speed.
CVT TUNING
The transmission must allow for quick and
appropriate gear transitions. At launch, a
vehicle must overcome its standing inertia to
gain speed and obtain a beneficial start. Ideally,
plot showing the CVT ratio at different engine
in acceleration event, top speed should be
speed; mass 250 gram (upper) and mass
maintained for the longer duration of time. This
275g(lower) for same spring rate.
means a lower range of gear ratio is needed to
2
3