Design Note

Project Prestige RCR 67

Subject Modelling Assumptions - Rehab SD ETABS Models
Project no 0043358
Date

Revision Description Issued by Date Approved (signature)

00 Modelling Assumptions for Rehab Model AG 6th July 2020 KSJ

1 Introduction
The purpose of this document is to outline the key ETABS modelling assumptions for the RCR67 Rehab Tower at the
Schematic Design stage as per BH standard practice.

1.1 Key information generally presented at SD Stage

As per standard practice, during the Schematic Stage, the ETABS model is generally developed for the selected preferred
options for LLRS to suit the architecture. At this stage, the design lateral loads are expected to be more accurate than
concept stage. The ETABS models at this stage is to focus on refinement of selected LLRS. During this stage the
modelling will tend to be narrowed down on following aspects:

 To optimize the LLRSS, generally independent of the GLRSS as the latter is a separate exercise. The optimization
process involves elemental optimization. This can be in the form of element configurations (eg. core
configurations) and/or element locations/positions. This is done in close coordination with Architect and other
engineering disciplines including MEP and VT.
 Initial element sizing (eg wall thicknesses and coupling beam sizes etc).
 Generally, the modelling does not necessarily include the intricacies of the floor system and other GLRS
elements as these elements are developed in parallel using either manual design or using other software
analytical tools.

By end of Schematic phase, coordination of Architecture and other significant engineering disciplines for the primary
structural elements of the LLRS in terms of element configurations and element location is completed.

2 RCR67 Rehab Tower Models

For the RCR67 Rehab Tower, the following ETABS models on version v17.2.0 have been created:

 SLS – to compute serviceability limit state checks

 ULS – to carry out strength checks

 Deformation compatibility – to carry out deformation compatibility check for GLRS as per IS 13920:
2016, Section 11

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit, use and information of DB Realty Pvt. Ltd. for the purposes set out in the Design note
or instructions commissioning it. The liability of Buro Happold in respect of the information contained in the report will not extend to
any third party. All concepts and proposals are copyright © 1976 – 2020 Buro Happold. All rights reserved. Issued in commercial
confidence.
 BURO HAPPOLD

2.1 Modelling assumptions

The main modelling assumptions and simplifications are listed below for the RCR67 Rehab Tower:

 Suspended Loft Modelling: The loft layout is changes at each level. An equivalent load of suspended loft load is
applied at typical floor to cover the weight and mass in global analysis and hence, is not modelled on ETABS.
 In Concept / Schematic stage for sizing of elements it is ensured that the gravity loading is around +/- 5 to 10%
accuracy. More accurate loading and live load reduction will be carried in detailed design/ GFC stage while
performing reinforcement detailing.
 Modelling accuracy: In Concept / Schematic stage it is ensure that the that sizes of elements in ETABS are
approximately +/- 5% accuracy and position of elements is under approx. +/- 10% accuracy. This will be further
refined in Detailed design stage.
 The retaining wall is modelled but modifiers are provided to ensure that they act as a vertical load resisting
element only. A backstay analysis will be performed in Detailed design stage.
 The modelling does not include the intricacies of the basements/podium and foundations and the like as these
areas under ASMEP coordination.
 P-delta based on loads has performed.
 Internal partition wall load is applied as a uniform area load. Calculation of uniform area load intensity is
provided in Schematic report.
 Frame section reinforcement data: We use a range of other tools, proprietary software and/or BH developed
software, to derive loads, analyse and design for the elements of the gravity load resisting structural system
(GLRSS). Sizing of LLRS elements in Concept / Schematic stage will be done based on stresses. Hence, frame
section reinforcement data in not critical at the Concept / Schematic stage.
 Diaphragm: A rigid Diaphragm is applied at concept / Schematic stage.
 Openings in slabs: Small MEP shaft openings in slab are not modelled in Concept / Schematic stage. These will
be covered in Detailed Design Stage.
 Wall opening locations were continuously changing at concept/ schematic stage. Hence, some opening
locations might not match by a small margin at this stage, however, these have been taken care of to generally
estimate the global behaviour.
 Stiffness Modifier: Provided as per IS16700. The slab is not considered as part of the LLRS in the ULS model.
Appropriate bending modifiers are provided for slab in ULS model.
 Slabs are modelled as shell element. Stairs / ramps are modelled as membrane.
 Physical modelling of slab folds, sunk /depression in slab will not be carried out in ETABS. Appropriate loading
will be considered.
 Physical modelling of non-structural walls/parapet/pardi/chajja will not be carried out in ETABS. Appropriate
loading will be considered.

3 Future scope
Some of the major areas BH will work in further stages are listed below:

 Schematic report and drawings are prepared as per available information from Architect / Client in schematic
stage. Any structural update required because of information provided by Architect / Client after Schematic
stage will be incorporated in Detailed Design stage. Some of the ongoing updates are presented in the
Annexure below.
 Gust wind forces are used in Schematic stage in absence of wind tunnel data. Any modification required
because of wind tunnel data will be carried out in Detailed Design stage.
 In the absence of reliable Geotechnical data during the schematic design stage, an SBC of 3000kN/m 2 has been
considered for the foundation design. The geo-technical report received after Schematic stage indicates
800kN/m2 SBC. Modification required in foundation scheme will be carried out in Detailed Design stage.
 A detailed construction phasing for the site and construction program for each phase is awaited from client. We
expect client to provide this information before end of Detailed Design stage. If any modification is required,
this will be performed at the Detailed Design stage.
 The back-stay effect will be studied in Detailed Design stage.

Page 2 of 3
 BURO HAPPOLD

 Steel member optimisation for the loft will be considered in the Detailed Design Stage.
 A value engineering study such as using lightweight concrete for the loft floors will be done in Detailed Design
stage.
 A detailed study about material grade variation along the height for vertical elements will be carried out in the
Detailed Design Stage.
 Temperature analysis of exposed slabs will be carried out in Detailed Design stage.

Page 3 of 3