Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revision Long Q JJ2020 Mco1
Revision Long Q JJ2020 Mco1
Revision Long Q JJ2020 Mco1
209
2: Decision-making techniques
1 The Telephone Co Relevant costs Q1, D11, (a) 209
2 Hair Co CVP Q1, D12, (a) and (b) 210
3 CSC Co Limiting factors Q2, S16 211
4 Heat Co Pricing, Learning curves Q2, J11, (a) 213
5 Robber Co Make or Buy and other short Q1, J12, (a) and (c) 214
term decisions
6 Cement Co Risk and uncertainty in Q1, J11 215
decision making
2 : De c is io n - m a k i n g t e c h n iq u e s
(20 marks)
(20 marks)
Limiting factors
For each of the three products, the expected demand for the next month is 11,200 cakes, 9,800
cookies and 2,500 shakes.
The total fixed costs for the next month are $3,000.
CSC Co has just found out that the supply of Betta is going to be limited to 12,000 grams next
month. Prior to this, CSC Co had signed a contract with a leading chain of gyms, Encompass
Health, to supply it with 5,000 shakes each month, at a discounted price of $5·80 per shake,
starting immediately. The order for the 5,000 shakes is not included in the expected demand
levels above.
Required:
(a) Assuming that CSC Co keeps to its agreement with Encompass Health, calculate the
shortage of Betta, the resulting optimum production plan and the total profit for next
month. (6
marks)
One month later, the supply of Betta is still limited and CSC Co is considering whether it should
breach its contract with Encompass Health so that it can optimise its profits.
Required:
(b) Discuss whether CSC Co should breach the agreement with Encompass Health.
212 Revision questio ns: 2 : Decision- making ACCA F5 Question Bank
techniques Note: No further calculations are required. (4 marks)
Several months later, the demand for both cakes and cookies has increased significantly to 20,000
and 15,000 units per month respectively. However, CSC Co has lost the contract with Encompass
Health
and, after suffering from further shortages of supply of Betta, Singa and of its labour force, CSC Co
has decided to stop making shakes at all. CSC Co now needs to use linear programming to
work out the optimum production plan for cakes and cookies for the coming month. The variable ‘x’
is being used to represent cakes and the variable ‘y’ to represent cookies.
The following constraints have been formulated and a graph representing the new production
problem has been drawn:
Singa: 0·25x + 0·5y ≤
12,000 Betta: 0·5x + 0·2y
≤ 12,500 Labour: 0·1x +
0·12y ≤ 3,000
x ≤ 20,000
y ≤ 15,000
x, y ≥ 0
Copyright
2017
Intuit
ion
Required:
(c)
(i) Explain what the line labelled ‘C = 2·6x + 1·75y’ on the graph is and what the area
represented by the points 0ABCD means. (4 marks)
(ii) Explain how the optimum production plan will be found using the line labelled ‘C =
2·6x + 1·75y’ and identify Explain what the line labelled ‘C = 2·6x + 1·75y’ on the
graph is and what the area represented by the points 0ABCD means.the optimum
point from the graph. (2 marks)
(iii) Explain what a slack value is and identify, from the graph, where slack will occur
as a result of the optimum production plan. (4 marks)
Note: No calculations are needed for part (c).
(20 marks)
ACCA F5 Question Bank Revision questio ns: 2 : Decision- making techniques
213
Pricing decisions
Note
The first air conditioning unit took 1.5 hours to make and labour cost $8 per hour. A 95%
learning curve exists, in relation to production of the unit, although the learning curve is
expected to finish after making 100 units. Heat Co’s management have said that any pricing
decisions about the Energy Buster should be based on the time it takes to make the 100th unit
of the product. You have been told that the learning co-efficient, b = -0.0740005.
All other costs are expected to remain the same up to the maximum demand levels.
Required:
(a)
(i) Establish the demand function (equation) for air conditioning units; (3 marks)
(ii) Calculate the marginal cost for each air conditioning unit after adjusting the
labour cost as required by the note above; (6 marks)
(iii) Equate marginal cost and marginal revenue in order to calculate the optimum
price and quantity, (3 marks)
(b) Explain what is meant by a ‘penetration pricing’ strategy and a ‘market skimming’
strategy and discuss whether either strategy might be suitable for Heat Co when
launching the Energy Buster. (8 marks)
(20 marks)
Make or buy and other short-term decisions
The attributable fixed costs remain unaltered irrespective of the level of production of keypads
and display screens, because as soon as one unit of either is made, the costs rise. We know that
we will make at least one unit of each component as both are cheaper to make than buy.
Therefore they are an irrelevant common cost.
(c) Discuss the non-financial factors that Robber Co should consider when making a decision
about outsourcing the manufacture of keypads and display screens.
(5 marks)
Non-financial factors
The company offering to supply the keypads and display screens is a new company. This would make it extremely risky to rely on it for
continuity of supplies. Many new businesses go out of business within the first year of being in business and, without these two crucial
components, Robber Co would be unable to meet demand for sales of control panels.
Robber Co would need to consider whether there are any other potential suppliers of the components. This would be useful as both a
price comparison now and also to establish the level of dependency that would be committed to if this new supplier is used. If the
supplier goes out of business, will any other company be able to step in? If so, at what cost?
The supplier has only agreed to these prices for the first two years. After this, it could put up its prices dramatically. By this stage,
Robber Co would probably be unable to begin easily making its components in house again, as it would probably have sold off its
machinery and committed to larger sales of control panels.
The quality of the components could not be guaranteed. If they turn out to be poor quality, this will give rise to problems in the
control panels, leading to future loss of sales and high repair costs under warranties for Robber Co. The fact that the supplier is based
overseas increases the risk of quality and continuity of supply, since it has even less control of these than it would if it was a UK supplier.
Robber Co would need to establish how reliable the supplier is with meeting promises for delivery times. This kind of information may
be difficult to establish because of the fact that the supplier is a new company. Late delivery could have a serious impact on
Robber Co’s production and delivery schedule.
(20 marks)
(20 marks)
216 Revision questio ns: 3 : B udgeting and co ACCA F5 Question Bank
ntrol
1: B u d g e t in g a n d c o n t r o l
The head teacher uses incremental budgeting to budget for his expenditure, taking actual
expenditure for the previous year as a starting point and simply adjusting it for inflation, as
shown below.
Actual cost Inflationary Budgeted cost
Note for y/e 31 May adjustment for y/e 31 May
2013 2014
$ $
Repairs and maintenance 1 44,000 +3% 45,320
Salaries 2 620,000 +2% 632,400
Capital expenditure 3 65,000 +6% 68,900
Total budgeted expenditure 746,620
(20 marks)
Quantitative analysis
marks)
(20 marks)
Standard costing
$ $ $ $
Revenue: Food 48,000 60,840
Drinks 12,000 11,700
60,000 72,540
Variable costs:
Staff wages (9,216) (13,248)
Food costs (6,000) (7,180)
Drink costs (2,400) (5,280)
Energy costs (3,387) (3,500)
(21,003) (29,208)
Contribution 38,997 43,332
Fixed costs:
Manager’s and chef’s pay (8,600) (8,600)
Rent, rates and depreciation (4,500) (13,100) (4,500) (13,100)
Operating profit 25,897 30,232
(20 marks)
ACCA F5 Question Bank Revision questio ns: 3 : Budgeting and co ntrol
221
The calculations above have shown that, as regards the sales price, there is a $23,360 favourable operational
variance and a $54,680 adverse planning variance. In total, these net off to a sales price variance of $31,320 adverse.
The sales manager can only be responsible for a variance to the extent that he controls it. Since the standard selling
prices are set by a consultant, rather than the sales manager, the sales manager can only be held responsible for the
operational variance. Given that this was a favourable variance of $23,360, it appears that he has performed well,
achieving sales prices which, on average, were higher than the market prices at the time. The consultant’s
predictions, however, were rather inaccurate, and it is these that have caused an adverse variance to occur overall in
relation to sales price.
As regards sales volumes, the mix variance is $13,366 adverse and the quantity variance is $16,406 favourable, meaning that the
total volume variance is $3,040 favourable. This is because total sales volumes were higher than expected, although it is apparent
that the increased sales related to the lower margin Commodity 2, with sales of Commodity 1 and Commodity 3 actually being lower
than budget.
The total variance relating to sales is $28,280 adverse. This looks poor but, as identified above, it is due to the inaccuracy of the sales
price forecasts made by the consultant. We know that Block Co is facing tough market conditions because of the economic recession
and therefore it is not that surprising that market prices were actually a bit lower than originally anticipated.
This could be due to the recession hitting even harder in this quarter than in previous ones.
(20 marks)
Planning and operational variances
When looking at the total variances alone, it looks like the Production Manager has been extremely poor at controlling his staff’s
efficiency, since the labour efficiency variance is $21,000 adverse. It also looks, at a glance, like he has managed to secure labour at a
lower rate.
In order to assess the Production Manager’s performance fairly, however, only the operational variances should be taken into
account. This is because planning variances reflect differences that arise because of factors that are outside the control of the
production manager. The operational variance for the labour rate was $0, which means that the labour force were paid exactly what
was agreed at the end of October: their reduced rate of $11.40 per hour. The manager clearly did not have to pay anyone for
overtime, for example, which would have been expected to push this rate up. The rate reduction was secured by the company and
was not within the control of the Production Manager, so he cannot take credit for the favourable rate planning variance of $7,200.
The company is the source of this improvement.
As regards labour efficiency, the planning and operational variances give us more information about the total efficiency variance of
$21,000 (A). When this is broken down into its two parts, it becomes clear that the operational variance, for which the Manager does
have control, is actually $3,600 favourable. This is because, when the recipe is changed as it has been in November, the chocolates
usually take 20% longer to make in the first month while the workers are getting used to handling the new ingredient mix. When this
is taken into account, it can therefore be seen that workers took less than the 20% extra time that they were expected to take, hence
the positive operational variance. The planning variance, on the other hand, is $24,600 adverse. This is because the standard labour
time per batch was not updated in November to reflect the fact that it would take longer to produce the truffles. The Manager
cannot be held responsible for this.
Overall, then, the Manager has performed well, given the change in the recipe.
(20 marks)
Required:
(a) For each perspective of the balanced scorecard, identify two goals (objectives) together with
a corresponding performance measure for each goal which could be used by the
company to assess whether the changes have been successful. Justify the use of each of
the performance measures that you choose. (16 marks)
(b) Discuss how the company could reduce the problem of customers terminating their pay-
tv service after only three months. (4 marks)
(20 marks)
Notes
(1) Breakdown of revenue
31 August 20X6 31 August 20X5
$’000 $’000
Household goods 38,990 41,160
Electronic goods 41,870 32,640
Cloud computing services 12,400 6,520
Gold membership fees 1,400 2,000
94,660 82,320
(2) Breakdown of cost of sales
31 August 20X6 31 August 20X5
$’000 $’000
Household goods 23,394 28,812
Electronic goods 26,797 21,216
Cloud computing services 4,240 1,580
Gold membership fees 100 100
54,531 51,708
(3) Administration expenses
Included in these costs are the costs of running the customer service department ($860,000
in 20X5; $1,900,000 in 20X6.) This department deals with customer complaints.
(4) Non-financial data
31 August 20X6 31 August 20X5
Percentage of orders delivered on time 74% 92%
No. of customer complaints 1,400,000 320,000
No. of customers 7,100,000 6,500,000
Percentage of late ‘Gold’ member deliveries 14·00% 2·00%
Required:
Discuss the financial and non-financial performance of Jungle Co for the year ending 31 August 20X6.
Note: There are 7 marks available for calculations and 13 marks available for discussion.
(20 marks)
(20 marks)
(20 marks)
(20 marks)