Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TINAAN - 3A4 - M2 - Formative Assessment No 3
TINAAN - 3A4 - M2 - Formative Assessment No 3
TINAAN - 3A4 - M2 - Formative Assessment No 3
You are married with a young daughter who was diagnosed with cancer. Her treatment requires a big sum of money
to the tune of P800,000. You were struggling to raise this amount.
Professionally, you work as the Finance Manager of a large manufacturing company. Currently the company is under
examination by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). At the moment, the company is losing due to the significant
drop in demand arising from the Covid19 pandemic and is experiencing cash flow problems.
Finally, when the review was over, the BIR assessment came out in the midst of the pandemic and it was an
overwhelming P20,000,000 inclusive of interests and penalties. You were tasked to negotiate with the BIR.
The BIR examiner told you that this can be settled outside of the regular assessment process if your company were
willing. The examiner offered that it can be settled for P5M, P2M of which will be remitted to the National Treasury
and will be issued a government official receipt, P1M will be for you and P2M for the examiner. Otherwise, the
assessment stands at P20M.
What will you do? Will you accept the offer of the BIR examiner? How about your personal problem? How about
the cashflow problems of your company?
Instructions:
Come up with a proposal and a plan of action with the following details using 400 to 600 words.
Using the viral news test, and taking into consideration how choosing to pay for only 5
million would be viewed by others if it became viral headline news, I would choose to pay for the
20 million instead of the paying 5 million, which is outside the regular assessment process. As a
professional, I should not let my personal life mix with my professional work, so even if the 5
million option would be more beneficial for me and the company, I would still choose to pay the
20 million because it is the right thing to do.
2. Construct a similar matrix proposed by Dr. Antonette Angeles. Identify the positive (+) and
negative (-) consequences in the table (i.e., discuss in two sentences or less the consequences
rather than just putting the plus or minus sign).
My answer would be to pay the original amount of 20 million because it is the right thing
to do. As a professional, I should not let my personal problems influence how I make decisions
about my professional work. Deontology ethics can be applied in this case because I should
consider what is more in line with my duty. Also, taking into consideration Emanuel Kant’s
Categorical Imperative, where it states that I should act only in a maxim whereby I can, at the same
time, will that it should become a universal law; if all companies decided not to pay their correct
BIR dues, our country would experience a downturn because of the corruption that people
continuously commit. I know for a fact that as a parent, I will not give up on my daughter, but I
will not resort to sacrificing the common good for my own gain. I can do the right thing and choose
to pay the right amount to BIR, and then think of another way to pay my daughters treatment
because there are many possible ways where I can get money without being selfish and sacrificing
the common good for my own gain.