Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marine Fender Catalogue
Marine Fender Catalogue
Contents
CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................... …….i
1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1
BRIDGESTONE MARINE FENDERS: PRODUCT OVERVIEW
2. QUALITY CONTROL .................................................................................................................................... 3
3. HYPER CELL FENDER (HC) ........................................................................................................................ 4
HYPER CELL FENDER PERFORMANCE
HYPER CELL FENDER GENERIC PERFORMANCE CURVE
HYPER CELL FENDER DIMENSIONS
HYPER CELL FENDER FIXING BOLT LOCATIONS
4. SUPER CELL FENDER (SUC) ..................................................................................................................... 9
SUPER CELL FENDER PERFORMANCE
SUPER CELL FENDER GENERIC PERFORMANCE CURVE
SUPER CELL FENDER DIMENSIONS
SUPER CELL FENDER FIXING BOLT LOCATIONS
5. DYNA ARCH FENDER (DA) ....................................................................................................................... 14
DYNA ARCH FENDER PERFORMANCE
DYNA ARCH FENDER GENERIC PERFORMANCE CURVE
DYNA ARCH FENDER DIMENSIONS
DYNA ARCH FENDER FIXING BOLT LOCATIONS
6. SUPER ARCH FENDER (SA) ..................................................................................................................... 24
SUPER ARCH FENDER PERFORMANCE
SUPER ARCH FENDER GENERIC PERFORMANCE CURVE
SUPER ARCH FENDER DIMENSIONS
SUPER ARCH FENDER FIXING BOLT LOCATIONS
7. SMALL CRAFT FENDERS ......................................................................................................................... 26
CYLINDRICAL FENDER (CY)
CYLINDRICAL FENDER DIMENSION
SUPER TURTLE FENDER (ST150H/ST200H)
TURTLE FENDER (T100H/T130H)
SEAL FENDER (S100H/S130H)
SUPER ARCH CORNER FENDER (C-SA)
W FENDER (W230H)
WHARF HEAD PROTECTOR (HT20H)
SAFETY RUBBER LADDER (SL150H, SL200H, SL250H)
8. THE ACCESSORIES OF FENDER SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 35
FENDER PANEL
FRONTAL PADS AND FIXINGS
ANCHORS AND FRAME FIXINGS
CHAIN SYSTEM AND CHAIN FIXING ANCHOR
ACCESSORIES MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS
9. MARINE FENDER DESIGN GUILDELINE.................................................................................................. 42
MARINE FENDER DESIGN FLOW CHART
DEFINITIONS OF VESSEL PARAMETERS
BERTHING ENERGY CALCULATIONS
BERTHING VELOCITY
MASS COEFFICIENT (Cm)
ECCENTRICITY FACTOR (Ce)
SOFTNESS COEFFICIENT (Cs)
CONFIGURATION COEFFICIENT (Cc)
FACTOR OF ABNORMAL BERTHING
CASE STUDY: FENDER SELECTION
MULTIPLE-FENDER-CONTACT AND FENDER PITCH
DESIGN BY BERTH CONSIDERATIONS
DESIGN BY VESSEL CONSIDERATIONS
FENDER PANEL DESIGN
CHAIN SYSTEM DESIGN
FIXINGS AND ANCHORS DESIGN
10. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING FACILITIES ...................................................................... 59
FINITE ELEMENTS ANALYSIS (FEA)
TESTING FACILITIES
11. MARINE FENDER VERIFICATION ............................................................................................................. 62
PHYSICAL PROPERTY OF RUBBER
FENDER PERFORMANCE TEST
DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES
APPENDIX ............................................................................................................................................................ 64
TABLE OF VESSEL DATA
UNIT CONVERSION TABLE
LIST OF REFERENCE
DISCLAIMER
i
MARINE FENDER SYSTEMS
1. INTRODUCTION
On this basis, Bridgestone has established its presence over 150 markets and has about 180
manufacturing facilities worldwide. Founded in 1931 by Shojiro Ishibashi, Bridgestone Corporation
Ltd. emphasizes on giving the best quality to the customers. Being a tire-maker company,
Bridgestone also manufactures a diverse range of industrial products and chemical products.
One of the strong areas in the industrial rubber fields, which Bridgestone has stamped its presence, is
Marine Fender. With the performance of marine fenders scientifically evaluated, combined with severe
quality control as in ISO9001 and PIANC (Permanent International Association of Navigation
Congresses) and technical back-up services.
Marine fenders have been an indispensable product at various port facilities throughout the world. The
demand for good and reliable quality fender systems is ever increasing. For more than 50 years,
Bridgestone has played an important role to provide high quality marine fender systems to ports
worldwide. With its state-of-the-art facilities and continuous investment in research and development
work, Bridgestone diligently innovates and searches for the best fendering solutions. From cylindrical
fenders to the advanced cell series fenders, Bridgestone prides itself for being able to bring genuine
and value-added technology to its clients.
Energy Absorption
Type of Fender Capacity Typical Applications
(kN-m)
2. QUALITY CONTROL
Bridgestone fenders are well known for their quality. Being the largest rubber-based company,
Bridgestone understands rubber better than anyone else and leverages its expertise in rubber
technology in marine fender systems. Bridgestone fenders are one of the original and most-trusted
brands in the world. Equipped with world-class testing facilities and the most stringent testing
procedures, Bridgestone fenders give you peace of mind wherever vessels berth.
High durability and excellent quality are synonymous with Bridgestone fenders. This is well supported
by impressive results of durability testing on our Super Cell (SUC) and Hyper Cell (HC) fenders.
We can meet the rigorous requirements of PIANC. Moreover, Bridgestone fender is made from the
finest and highest quality of natural rubber at ISO9001-certified manufacturing plants.
Being a market leader in fendering solutions, Bridgestone has over 50 years of proven installations
and has become the fender of choice.
Since 1996, Hyper Cell fenders have been in service at ports around the world. Specifically, Hyper
Cell fenders are very popular at Container Terminals due to its durability and performance.
Similar to Super Cell fenders, Hyper Cell fenders are typically designed with fender panels to allow for
better distribution of stress across the hull surface.
The 50 years of experience in fendering solutions certainly help make Hyper Cell a better product.
Performance
67.5% (J4 Deflection)
Grade
Fender
Size Reaction Energy
Force Absorption
(kN) (kN-m)
J1 100 22.4
J2 126 28.0
HC400H
J3 157 35.0
J4 196 41.6
J1 226 75.6
J2 283 94.5
HC600H
J3 353 118
J4 441 141
J1 308 120
J2 385 150
HC700H
J3 481 188
J4 601 223
J1 402 179
J2 502 224
HC800H
J3 628 280
J4 785 333
J1 509 255
J2 636 319
HC900H
J3 795 399
J4 993 474
J1 628 350
J2 785 438
HC1000H
J3 981 547
J4 1230 651
J1 830 533
J2 1040 666
HC1150H
J3 1300 832
J4 1620 990
J1 1060 769
J2 1330 962
HC1300H
J3 1660 1200
J4 2070 1430
J1 1230 961
J2 1540 1200
HC1400H
J3 1920 1500
J4 2400 1790
Note:
1. Optional intermediate performance grade with performance characteristic of -5%, -10% and -15% are available upon
request (except for performance grade J1).
2. Performance data is based on having mount height equal to 0.15 times of fender height in place on top of the fender.
3. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
Center
70.00 69.59 69.21 69.06 68.71 67.26 64.77 61.73
Deflection (%)
Reaction Force
equivalent to that Reaction
1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
of 70.0% Force
normal deflection
Energy
1.000 0.997 0.995 0.995 0.992 0.973 0.929 0.872
Absorption
Performance Grade J4
Center
67.5 66.9 66.4 66.2 66.0 65.1 63.2 60.4
Deflection (%)
Reaction Force
equivalent to that Reaction
1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
of 67.5% Force
normal deflection
Energy
1.000 0.992 0.986 0.984 0.983 0.972 0.932 0.870
Absorption
Note:
1. Fender performance is reduced on angular compression.
2. The table above shows the energy capacity of fenders at different compression angles.
Md1 d2
Fender (performance (performance
H D1 D2 A1 A2 grade dependent) grade dependent) N T t
Size
J1 J2 J3 J4 J1 J2 J3 J4
Note:
1. *HC400H fender has a combination of 4-M22 and 6-M16 for fender fixings and frame fixings respectively.
2. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
HC400H 72
HC600H 221
HC700H 349
HC800H 520
HC900H 754
HC1000H 1033
HC1150H 1562
HC1300H 2223
HC1400H 2724
Md
Fender (performance grade dependant) N A P1 P2
Size
J1 J2 J3 J4
HC400H M22 4 560 396 396
Note:
1. All units are in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Generally, case 2 bolt pattern is frequently used as it requires less concrete height
compared to case 1 bolt pattern whilst case 1 bolt pattern requires less concrete width.
Bridgestone Super Cell fenders are unique, having an effectively high energy absorption to reaction
force ratio as one of its salient features. They are cylindrical in shape with two steel mounting plates
permanently bonded to both ends of the main rubber column during vulcanization.
Super Cell fenders are typically fitted with fender panels to obtain a wide contact area on contact with
the vessel, thus reducing pressure against the vessel hull as much as required.
Performance
Performance
(Rated Deflection) (Rated Deflection)
Grade
Grade
Fender Fender
Size Reaction Energy Size Reaction Energy
Force Absorption Force Absorption
(kN) (kN-m) (kN) (kN-m)
R1 55.9 9.80 R1 734 467
R0 69.8 12.3 R0 918 584
SUC400H RH 90.8 15.9 SUC1450H RH 1200 764
RS 105 18.4 RS 1370 872
RE 118 20.7 RE 1550 987
R1 87.3 19.2 R1 894 628
R0 109 23.9 R0 1120 787
SUC500H RH 142 31.2 SUC1600H RH 1450 1020
RS 164 36.0 RS 1680 1180
RE 184 40.4 RE 1890 1330
R1 138 38.2 R1 1010 754
R0 174 48.1 R0 1270 948
SUC630H RH 226 62.5 SUC1700H RH 1640 1220
RS 260 71.9 RS 1890 1410
RE 292 80.8 RE 2130 1590
R1 224 78.7 R1 1390 1220
R0 280 98.3 R0 1750 1540
SUC800H RH 363 127 SUC2000H RH 2270 1990
RS 419 147 RS 2620 2300
RE 472 166 RE 2950 2590
R1 349 153 R1 2090 2060
R0 437 192 R0 2450 2420
SUC1000H RH 568 249 SUC2250H RH 3190 3150
RS 655 288 RS 3680 3630
RE 738 324 RE 4150 4100
R1 462 233 R1 2570 2820
R0 578 292 R0 3030 3330
SUC1150H RH 750 379 SUC2500H RH 3930 4310
RS 866 437 RS 4540 4980
RE 976 493 RE 5120 5620
R1 545 299 R1 3710 4890
R0 682 374 R0 4370 5750
SUC1250H RH 887 487 SUC3000H RH 5670 7470
RS 1020 560 RS - -
RE 1160 637 RE - -
Note:
1. Optional intermediate performance grade with performance characteristic of ±10% are available upon request.
(Except –10% for lowest performance grade and +10% for highest performance grade).
2. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
Center
52.5 51.9 51.3 50.8 50.3 48.8 45.5 41.3
Deflection (%)
Reaction Force
equivalent to that
Reaction Force 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
of 52.5%
normal deflection
Energy
1.000 0.977 0.950 0.936 0.922 0.883 0.801 0.652
Absorption
Note:
1. Fender performance is reduced on angular compression.
2. The table above shows the energy capacity of fender at different compression angles.
d Approx.
Fender (performance grade dependent)
H D A N T Mass
Size
R1 R0 RH RS RE (kg)
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
Md
Fender (performance grade dependent)
N A P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Size
R1 R0 RH RS RE
Note:
1. All units are in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Generally, case 2 bolt pattern is frequently used as it requires less concrete height
compared to case 1 bolt pattern whilst case 1 bolt pattern requires less concrete width.
The Dyna Arch Fenders are available in three (3) types to enable a port owner or engineer to make
the most suitable selection.
2) With frontal pads and fender panel (Type B or known as DA-B Fender)
3) With frontal pads bonded to the fender (Type S or known as DA-S Fender)
• High durability as the internal stresses are dispersed throughout the fender body
• Ease of installation
Performance
(Rated Deflection) (Rated Deflection)
Grade
Fender Fender
Grade
Size Reaction Energy Size Reaction Energy
Force Absorption Force Absorption
(kN) (kN-m) (kN) (kN-m)
M3 143 15.1 M3 143 13.4
DA-B250H
DA-A250H M2 169 17.8 M2 169 15.9
DA-S250H
M1 204 21.5 M1 204 19.2
M3 172 21.7 M3 172 19.4
DA-B300H
DA-A300H M2 202 25.5 M2 202 22.9
DA-S300H
M1 245 30.9 M1 245 27.7
M3 230 38.6 M3 230 34.5
DA-B400H
DA-A400H M2 270 45.4 M2 270 40.6
DA-S400H
M1 327 54.9 M1 327 49.1
M3 286 60.2 M3 286 54.0
DA-B500H
DA-A500H M2 337 70.9 M2 337 63.5
DA-S500H
M1 408 85.7 M1 408 76.7
M3 344 86.8 M3 344 77.6
DA-B600H
DA-A600H M2 405 102 M2 405 91.3
DA-S600H
M1 490 124 M1 490 111
M3 459 154 M3 459 138
DA-B800H
DA-A800H M2 540 181 M2 540 163
DA-S800H
M1 653 220 M1 653 196
M3 574 241 M3 574 216
DA-B1000H
DA-A1000H M2 675 284 M2 675 254
DA-S1000H
M1 816 343 M1 816 307
Note:
1. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
2. Fender performance is on per meter length basis.
k
(performance grade Approx.
Fender
H A W1 W2 F e f dependant) T t Mass
Size
(kg/m)
M3 M2 M1
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. The approximate mass of fender is based on both ends tapered.
k (performance
grade Approx.
Fender
H A W1 W2 F e f dependant) T t S Md Mass
Size
(kg/m)
M3 M2 M1
250H 250 410 187.5 500 162.5 90 125 26 28 27.5 24 125 M20 105
300H 300 490 225 600 195 105 140 28 31 33 26 150 M22 145
400H 400 670 300 800 260 120 165 32 35 40 30 180 M24 240
500H 500 840 375 1000 325 140 180 35 41 45 33 250 M27 360
600H 600 1010 450 1200 390 160 195 35 41 54 36 300 M30 520
800H 800 1340 600 1600 520 260 270 47 53 72 48 440 M36 885
1000H 1000 1680 750 2000 650 300 290 49 55 90 52 560 M42 1350
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. The approximate mass of fender is based on both ends straight.
Fender Length, L1
Dyna Arch Fender
(Type B)
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500
N 8 12 16 20 24 28
c1 125
p1 250
n1 3 5 7 9 11 13
k (performance Approx.
Fender grade dependant)
H A W1 W2 F e f T t U Mass
Size
(kg/m)
M3 M2 M1
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. The approximate mass of fender is based on both ends straight.
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Dyna Arch fender base length L 2 = 2 x C + n x P, where n = number of pitch/pitches
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. Non-standard length, profiles and bolting patterns are available upon request.
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Dyna Arch fender base length L 2 = 2 x C + n x P, where n = number of pitch/pitches
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. Non-standard length, profiles and bolting patterns are available upon request.
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Dyna Arch fender base length L 2 = 2 x C + n x P, where n = number of pitch/pitches
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. Non-standard length, profiles and bolting patterns are available upon request.
R1 169 11.60
SA200H
R2 147 10.10
Note:
1. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
Approx.
Fender
H A W1 W2 F e f k T t Mass
Size
(kg/m)
SA150H 150 240 98 300 96 55 95 25 22.5 19 36
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Super Arch fender base length L 2 = 2 x C + n x P, where n = number of pitch/pitches
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. Non-standard length, profiles and bolting patterns are available upon request.
Therefore, the demand is increasing for fenders with higher impact absorption and wider area
protection. Bridgestone is responding to this need by offering a full line of fenders and associated
spare parts for small wharves.
Note:
1. Flexible length available upon request. Kindly contact Bridgestone.
Energy Approx.
Fender
Absorption H A W1 W2 L (m) Mass
Size
(kN-m) (kg/m)
ST150H 6.07 150 375 195 435 1.0 to 3.5 48
ST150H M22 150 125 475 150 125 725 150 125 650 150 125 615 150 125 740 150 125 690
ST200H M24 150 121 515 150 131 760 150 126 675 150 131 630 150 131 755 - -
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. “n” denotes number of pitch/pitches.
5. Fender performance is on per meter length basis.
Energy Approx.
Fender Mass
Absorption H A W1 W2 L (m)
Size
(kN-m) (kg/m)
T100H 2.70 100 235 210 300 0.5 to 1.5 27
T100H M22 / M20 * 400 125 250 910 200 600 1420 300 450
T130H M24 380 125 250 880 200 600 1380 300 450
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. “n” denotes number of pitch/pitches.
5. Fender performance is on per meter length basis.
6. Bolt size of M20 is used for T100H with 500mm length.
Energy Approx.
Fender Mass
Absorption H A W1 W2 L (m)
Size (kg/m)
(kN-m)
S100H 2.70 100 240 180 300 0.5 to 2.0 22
S100H M22 110 330 110 830 110 665 110 610 111 776 111 707
S130H M22 110 330 110 830 110 665 110 610 111 776 111 707
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. “n” denotes number of pitch/pitches.
5. Fender performance is on per meter length basis.
DIMENSIONS
Fender Approx.
Md1 A H W1 W2 L P C k T t Mass (kg)
Size
100H M22 240 100 130 300 500 200 75 25 22.5 16.5 40
130H M22 240 130 111 300 500 200 75 25 22.5 16.5 45
150H M22 240 150 98 300 500 200 75 25 22.5 19.0 41
200H M24 320 200 131 400 750 350 100 29 30.0 21.0 100
250H M27 410 250 164 500 750 350 100 32 37.5 23.0 148
250H M27 410 250 164 500 1000 550 150 32 37.5 23.0 183
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
W FENDER (W230H)
W fenders have a wide contact surface and provide low surface pressure, an innovation made with
Dyna Slide technology onto Bridgestone’s original W fenders that are widely supplied all across
Japan. Combining a W200 fender and 30mm thick UHMW-PE pads through well controlled
vulcanization processes, the superior product of W230H was produced.
2k UHMW-PE PAD U
k
W
A
W
C nxP C T
Fixing Bolt
L N - Md H
Fender
Md N k A C n P
Size
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Fender performance is subject to the tolerance of max 10% for Reaction Force and -10% for Energy Absorption.
3. “N” denotes number of bolts required.
4. “n” denotes number of pitch/pitches.
5. Fender performance is on per meter length basis
DIMENSIONS
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
DIMENSIONS
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
Note:
1. Chain and pad arrangement illustrated is typical, but will vary depending upon job site conditions.
Bridgestone should be consulted for the final layout.
2. All colors shown are for identification purposes only. The actual offer may differ. Please consult Bridgestone for
further information regarding the standard colors available.
MAJOR ACCESSORIES
FENDER PANEL
Cell series fender systems (Hyper Cell or Super Cell) are typically designed with fender panels. The
fender panel helps to reduce the concentrated load acting on the vessel hull by distributing the force
across the flat frame surface. The fender panel size can be altered so that the average hull pressure
does not exceed the allowable hull pressure requirements, protecting the vessel hull effectively.
There are 2 types of fender panel constructions, namely open and sealed. Sealed frames are also
sometimes known as boxed frames. Generally, the open type fender panel facilitates the ease of
checking of the internal structure whereas the sealed type is relatively superior in corrosion protection.
The fender panel can be chamfered or cornered at the top, bottom or side edges, depending on the
types of vessels and hull constructions to avoid snagging of the belted vessel.
Protective Coating
Protective coating is essential to safeguard the fender panel performance under the corrosive marine
conditions. The epoxy protective coating system is recommended in accordance with ISO 12944 (1),
which complies with the expected durability of “High” under the seawater splash zone environment.
(1)
ISO 12944- Paints and varnishes — Corrosion protection of steel structures by protective paint systems
(2)
Alternative to the stated coating system are available upon request and are subjected to evaluation
Cathodic Protection
Sacrificial anodes (Zinc or Aluminium)
can be installed on frames for
additional corrosion protection apart
from protective coating against the
severe marine environment. The
weight of the anode is determined by
the number of years of protection.
Please consult Bridgestone for the
required number of anodes.
In the case of super bolts, the embedded portion will be cast into the concrete, providing a threading
part (sleeves) in which the bolt is installed. For resin anchors, the bolt is secured to the concrete
structure with the chemical resins acting as a bonding agent. The below diagrams provide a clear
illustration on the fixing mechanism of super bolts and resin anchors.
Frame Fixing
Frame fixings enable the fender panel to be fixed on the fender body. Different types of fenders
require different types of frame fixings and fixing arrangement. The below diagrams illustrate the
frame fixings configurations for Super Cell (SUC) fenders and Hyper Cell (HC) fenders.
Note:
1. All units in mm unless otherwise stated.
2. Bolt length and washer size may differ in accordance with the fixing application.
U-Anchor
U-Anchors are used with new concrete structure.
Bracket
Brackets are used with existing concrete structure.
ALTERNATIVE STANDARD
ACCESSORIES MATERIALS GRADE EN Grades
USA Std British Std
FENDER PANEL
UHMW
Frontal Pad - - - -
Polyethylene
FIXING BOLTS
Bolt, Washer,
Mild
Flange, Anchor SS400 in JIS G 3101 ASTM A36 BS4360-86 Gr.43A 1.0037
Super Bolt
Steel
Plate & Bar
Mild
Washer SS400 in JIS G 3101 ASTM A36 BS4360-86 Gr.43A 1.0037
Steel
Polyester
Resin Capsule - - -
Resin
Mild
Bolt, Nut & Washer SS400 in JIS G 3101 ASTM A36 BS4360-86 Gr.43A 1.0037
Steel
Mild
Frame Fixing
Bolt & Washer SS400 in JIS G 3101 ASTM A36 BS4360-86 Gr.43A 1.0037
Steel
CHAINS
Tension Chain
Steel Bars SBC490
Weight Chain (1) - - -
for Chains in JIS G 3105
Shear Chain
CHAIN ANCHORS
Mild
Bracket SM490 in JIS G 3106 ASTM A633 Gr. C BS4360-86 Gr.50A 1.0045
Steel
Note:
1. SBC 490 in JIS G 3105 is standard of steel bars for chains; hence no equivalent US standard exists. ASTM states
the standard for the chain itself, not the material.
Parameters Definitions
The total mass of cargo, stores, fuels, crew and reserves
Dead Weight Tonnage, DWT with which a vessel is laden when submerged to the
summer loading time
Displacement Tonnage, DT Total mass of the vessel and its contents
Gross internal volumetric capacity of the vessel as defined
Gross Tonnage, GT by the rules of registering authority and measured in units
of 2.83 m3
Length Overall, Loa Overall length of the vessel
Length measured between aft and fore perpendicular or
Length Between Perpendicular, Lpp along the waterline from forward surface of the stem to the
after surface of the sternpost
Molded Breadth, B Beam or width of the vessel
Molded Depth, D Total height of the ship
Full Load Draft, d Height of vessel below sea water level during full load
E= ½·M·v2
Where:
E = Kinetic energy of the vessel (kNm)
M = Mass of the vessel (=water displacement in tonnes)
v = Speed of the approaching vessel perpendicular to the berth (m/s)
The effective berthing energy of a vessel can be corrected from the kinetic energy as follows:
E= ½ · M · v 2 · Ce · Cm · Cs · Cc
Where:
E = Effective berthing energy (kNm)
M = Mass of design vessel (displacement in tonnes)
v = Approach velocity of vessel perpendicular to the berth (m/s)
Ce = Eccentricity factor
Cm = Virtual mass factor
Cs = Softness factor
Cc = Berth configuration factor or cushion factor
BERTHING VELOCITY
The berthing velocity can be estimated from the figure below.
Vasco Costa
According to Vasco Costa, when a vessel berths, a certain volume of water will be ‘pulled’ together,
creating a virtual mass. This volume is equivalent to d × d × Lpp.
Since the virtual mass will be created on both sides of the vessel,
the volume of water = 2d × d × Lpp and the volume of the vessel = Lpp × B × d.
Hence, the total volume of berthing is as follows:
2
Volume = L pp ⋅ B ⋅ d + 2 ⋅ d ⋅ L pp
⎛ 2⋅d⎞
= L pp ⋅ B ⋅ d ⋅ ⎜ 1 + ⎟
⎝ B ⎠
2d
Cm = 1 + for bow/ stern berthing
L pp
Where:
Lpp = Length of vessel’s hull between perpendiculars (m)
B = Breadth of the vessel (m)
d = Draft of vessel (m)
This formula was published in 1964 and is also used by the British Standards BS6349: Part 4.
It is valid under the following circumstances:
• the keel clearance shall be more than 0.1 × d
• the vessel's velocity shall be more than 0.08 m/s.
Shigeru Ueda
The formula of Shigeru Ueda originates from 1981 and is based on model experiments and field
observations. Cm is given by the formula:
π d
Cm = 1 + ⋅ for broadside berthing;
2 ⋅ Cb B
π d
Cm = 1 + ⋅ for bow/stern berthing.
2 ⋅ Cb L pp
DT
Block coefficient, Cb =
L pp ⋅B ⋅ d⋅ ρ
Where:
DT = Displacement tonnage of the vessel (tonnes)
Lpp = Length of vessel’s hull between perpendiculars (m)
B = Breadth of the vessel (m)
d = Draft of vessel (m)
ρ = Density of water (1.025 ton/m3 for seawater)
This remaining energy is obtained from the kinetic energy of a vessel by correction with the
eccentricity factor, Ce and may be calculated by means of the following equation:
K
2
+ R 2 ⋅ cos 2γ
Ce =
K +R
2 2
Where:
K = Radius of gyration of the ship (m)
Generally between 0.2L and 0.25L
Where:
Cb = Block coefficient
Lpp = Length of vessel’s hull between perpendiculars (m)
R = Distance of the point of contact from the center of mass (m)
γ = Angle between the line joining the point of contact to the center of
mass and the velocity vector (°)
In the absence of more reliable information, a figure of 1.0 for Cs is recommended when a soft fender
system is used, and between 0.9 and 1.0 for a hard fender system.
A hard fender system can be considered one in which the deflections of the fenders under impact
from design vessels are less than 0.15m.
A soft fender system has fender deflections greater than 0.15m under the same impacts.
The factor for abnormal impact may be applied to the berthing energy as calculated for a normal
impact to arrive at the abnormal berthing energy. This factor should enable reasonable abnormal
impacts to be absorbed by the fender system without damage. It would impracticable to design for an
exceptionally large abnormal impact and it must be accepted that such an impact would result in
damage.
Factor of
Type of Vessel Size
Abnormal Berthing
Largest 1.25
Tanker and Bulk Cargo
Smallest 1.75
Largest 1.5
Container Vessel
Smallest 2.0
Berthing Conditions:
Berthing Angle: 10 degrees
Flare Angle : 5 degrees
Angular Effects:
Angular effects determine the performance of a fender. The angular performance obtained by
multiplying the normal performance (Ø=0°) by the angular correction factor should be equal to or
greater than the effective berthing energy.
E ≤ Ea = En x ACFE
Moreover, the following equation should be utilized when there is any limit in the reaction force to a
wharf structure.
Rmax ≥ Ra = Rn x ACFR
ACFE 0.972
ACFR 1.000
The calculated effective berthing energy will be fully absorbed by the HC1150H(J4)x1x1 under the
angular berthing condition of 10 degrees.
Generally, British Standard: Maritime Structures, BS 6349 is used as a reference to estimate the
fender pitch by considering the minimum vessel length.
The study of multiple fender contact helps to determine the most optimum fender system and fender
pitch by considering the possible berthing scenarios of both maximum and minimum vessels. Two
important aspects are taken into consideration in the study of multiple fender contact:
In the analysis, the Combined Energy Capacity (EAC) based on the performance of multiple fenders
in contact with the vessel hull is evaluated. There are two worst-case scenarios of vessels coming into
contact with fender systems:
The berthing energy of the vessel should be fully absorbed by a number of fender systems under the
acceptable compression level of fenders.
4-Fender Contact
In a 4-fender contact case, the center vessel hull is at a distance H from the berthing line, when the
vessel hull just contacts with the center of both fender systems F1 and F4. At the same time, F2 and
F3 are compressed with h deflection.
The distance H and h can be related with the total fender pitch S and hull radius R as follows.
⎛ ⎛ S ⎞⎞
H = R ⋅ ⎜ 1 − cos⎜ sin - 1 ⎟⎟ For S = 3 x Fender Pitch (P)
⎝ ⎝ 2R ⎠ ⎠
⎛ ⎛ P ⎞ ⎛ - 1 S ⎞⎞
h = R ⋅ ⎜ cos⎜ sin − 1 ⎟ − cos⎜ sin ⎟⎟
⎝ ⎝ 2R ⎠ ⎝ 2R ⎠ ⎠
When the center vessel hull goes in further by a distance δ, the total displacement becomes H + δ.
Fender systems (F1 & F4) are being compressed by δ.
Therefore, the Combined Energy Capacity (EAC) when the center vessel hull goes in by a distance
H + δ from the berthing line can be calculated as follows.
3-Fender Contact
In a 3-fender contact case, the center vessel hull is at a distance H from berthing line (with the middle
fender system G2 being compressed with a distance H), when the vessel hull just contacts with the
center of both fender systems G1 and G3.
The distance H can be related with the fender pitch S and hull radius R as follows.
⎛ ⎛ S ⎞⎞
H = R ⋅ ⎜ 1 − cos⎜ sin - 1 ⎟⎟ For S = 2 x Fender Pitch (P)
⎝ ⎝ 2R ⎠ ⎠
When the center vessel hull goes in further by a distance δ, the total displacement becomes H + δ.
The fender system G2 is compressed by a distance H + δ and the adjacent fender systems
(G1 & G3) are being compressed by δ.
Therefore, the Combined Energy Capacity (EAC) when the center vessel hull goes in by a distance
H + δ from the berthing line is calculated as follows.
With the maximum displacement δ, the clearance between the vessel hull and the wharf k and
between the frame and the wharf j can be calculated. The both distances shall be kept at a safe
distance.
The reaction force of a selected fender should be less than the maximum allowable reaction force
(Rmax).
As a reference, the distance from the edge of the concrete to the outermost anchor position (Lc) shall
be equal to or larger than the length of the embedded anchor bolts (L).
Other Considerations
There are times whereby certain information is available or pre-determined. It is important to inform
Bridgestone by providing this available information to ensure optimum design output.
R
Average Face Pressure, P = ≤ Pa
A
The allowable face pressure differs with the type and size of the vessels shown as follows:
Allowable
Type of Vessel
Face Pressure (kN/m2)
Container Vessel
1st & 2nd Generation < 400
3rd Generation (Panamax) < 300
4th Generation < 250
5th & 6th Generation (Superpost Panamax) < 200
General Cargo
≤ 20,000 DWT 400 - 700
>20,000 DWT < 400
Oil Tanker
≤ 60,000 DWT < 300
>60,000 DWT < 350
VLCC < 200
Gas Tanker
LNG / LPG tanker < 200
Carriers
Bulk & Ore Carrier < 200
Belted Vessel
Ferry Belted or < 300
Passenger Belted or < 300
Ro-Ro Vessel Belted or < 300
Vessels such as general cargo carriers and oil tankers have nearly
straight vertical hull. On the other hand, container vessels have
complex hull curvature. it is therefore necessary to design a fender
system by taking this curvature into account. In this case, the
fender system typically experiences angular compression when it
comes into contact with the vessel hull.
As vessels have nearly straight curvature profile around the contact area with the fender system in the
horizontal direction, the vessel curvature consideration is normally not taken into account.
However, in some cases, if the curvature profile is not straight about the contact area, as shown in the
sketch, it is necessary to determine the spacing of fender systems to prevent the vessel from hitting
the wharf.
Where,
P = Fender Spacing
H = Fender Height
θ = Berthing Angle
R = Hull Radius of Curvature
2
P = 4 ⋅H⋅R - H
Remark:
For low contact, the mooring condition may be more severe
than the berthing condition. Mooring analysis shall be
considered in the case of open sea with little protection.
Belt Contact
Frame Size
The fender panel size is determined by the allowable face pressure of the vessel. The vessel contact
elevation and frame visibility at different tidal levels, in some cases, affect the designed frame size.
Design Strength
The fender panel is designed considering the below cases:
Chamfered Edges
When the vessel hull comes with a belt, the fender panel is normally designed with a top and bottom
chamfered edge, allowing the belt to slide on. The dimension of the belt is essential to determine the
required chamfer size.
Tension Chain
Tension chains are required to restrict the elongation of a fender within its allowable limits during
angular compression. It is typical to use upper and/or lower tension chains if limits are exceeded.
Weight Chain
When the weight of the accessories supported by the fender are over its allowable limit, weight chains
should be installed. In some instances, top tension chains are also necessary to avoid tilting of frame
whenever weight chains are fixed to the frame below the fender centerline in the elevation plane.
Shear Chain
Bridgestone’s cell-type fender systems (SUC and HC) have high allowable limits of shear
performance and superior resistance to shearing. The UHMW-PE low friction pads (μ = 0.2) coupled
with this superior shearing performance of the cell fenders enable the cell fenders to perform well
even without shear chain. However, if shearing deflection needs to be limited for other reasons, a pair
of shear chains should be installed symmetrically. The shear chain may have a share-function with
the tension chains and weight chains.
The maximum axial pull-out force and shearing force are used to evaluate the material strength of the
fixings and the concrete embedded anchor strength, as summarized below.
Where,
REl = Axial pull-out force at elongation limit
R = Reaction force of fender
n = Number of fixing bolts per fender
d = Effective diameter of fixing bolt
μ = Friction coefficient between frontal pad and steel
W = Weight of fender panel and half weight of fender body
φ = Attenuation coefficient (0.6 ~ 1.0)
Fc = Concrete strength
Ac1&2 = Surface projection area
Bridgestone has always paid special attention to quality control. Our products are developed through
proven steps and introduced to the market only after minute examination has been satisfactorily
completed. Quality control at Bridgestone does not merely mean statistical control of production.
Bridgestone believes every branch of the company should become involved in quality control in a
comprehensive manner to improve not only its products, but also the company's business operations
itself. Bridgestone calls this approach "Total Quality Control", our Deming Plan.
As rubber, which is often used for insulation, is a material difficult to cure, it is often necessary to carry
out careful research for obtaining proper performance of thick rubber products like marine fenders.
Therefore, long experience with high technology is essential for obtaining the performance required by
the operating conditions.
Testing Facilities
Model Tester
Tensile
MPa Min. 15.7
Strength JIS K 6251, ISO 37
ASTM D412 , BS 903 A.2
DIN 53504, CNS 3553:K 6344
GB/T 528
Elongation % Min. 300
Before Aging
1.5cc
Abrasion Resistance cc JIS K 6264, ISO 4649
(Max)
Option
The fender performance is expressed by the value of the energy absorbed and reaction force thus
generated during fender compression at the prescribed deflection.
In the fender performance test, the fender shall be compressed axially under the constant-slow
velocity of 0.0003-0.0013 m/s (2-8 cm/min) for three (3) times up to the rated deflection.
The load and the deflection in each test shall be recorded. The average of 2nd and 3rd cycle
performance data shall be adopted to determine the reaction value and energy value of the fender.
The energy absorption and reaction force at the standard deflection must be within the tolerance
value. If performance results of any fender exceed the tolerance, the fender will be rejected.
DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES
Pitch Circle Outer Base
Fender Height Bolt Hole
Diameter (P.C.D.) Diameter
Tolerance +4% / -2% ±4mm +4% / -2% ±2 mm
APPENDIX
CONTAINER VESSEL
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
7000 10700 123 115 20.3 9.8 7.2
10000 15100 141 132 22.4 11.3 8.0
15000 22200 166 156 25.0 13.3 9.0
20000 29200 186 175 27.1 14.9 9.9
25000 36100 203 191 28.8 16.3 10.6
30000 43000 218 205 30.2 17.5 11.1
40000 56500 244 231 32.3 19.6 12.2
50000 69900 266 252 32.3 21.4 13.0
60000 83200 286 271 36.5 23.0 13.8
GENERAL CARGO
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 1690 67 62 10.8 5.8 3.9
2000 3250 83 77 13.1 7.2 4.9
3000 4750 95 88 14.7 8.1 5.6
5000 7690 111 104 16.9 9.4 6.6
7000 10600 123 115 18.6 10.4 7.4
10000 14800 137 129 20.5 11.6 8.3
15000 21600 156 147 23.0 13.1 9.5
20000 28400 170 161 24.9 14.3 10.4
30000 41600 193 183 27.8 16.2 11.9
40000 54500 211 200 30.2 17.6 13.0
RO-RO SHIP
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 2190 73 66 14.0 6.2 3.5
2000 4150 94 86 16.6 8.4 4.5
3000 6030 109 99 18.3 10.0 5.3
5000 9670 131 120 20.7 12.5 6.4
7000 13200 148 136 22.5 14.5 7.2
10000 18300 169 155 24.6 17.0 8.2
15000 26700 196 180 27.2 20.3 9.6
20000 34800 218 201 29.1 23.1 10.7
30000 50600 252 233 32.2 27.6 12.4
BULK CARRIER
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
5000 6920 109 101 15.5 8.6 6.2
7000 9520 120 111 17.2 9.5 6.9
10000 13300 132 124 19.2 10.6 7.7
15000 19600 149 140 21.8 11.9 8.6
20000 25700 161 152 23.8 13.0 9.4
30000 37700 181 172 27.0 14.7 10.6
50000 61100 209 200 32.3 17.1 12.4
70000 84000 231 221 32.3 18.9 13.7
100000 118000 255 246 39.2 21.1 15.2
150000 173000 287 278 44.5 23.8 17.1
200000 227000 311 303 48.7 25.9 18.6
250000 280000 332 324 52.2 27.7 19.9
OIL TANKER
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 1580 61 58 10.2 4.5 4.0
2000 3070 76 72 12.6 5.7 4.9
3000 4520 87 82 14.3 6.6 5.5
5000 7360 102 97 16.8 7.9 6.4
7000 10200 114 108 18.6 8.9 7.1
10000 14300 127 121 20.8 10.0 7.9
15000 21000 144 138 23.6 11.6 8.9
20000 27700 158 151 25.8 12.8 9.6
30000 40800 180 173 29.2 14.8 10.9
50000 66400 211 204 32.3 17.6 12.6
70000 91600 235 227 38.0 19.9 13.9
100000 129000 263 254 42.5 22.5 15.4
150000 190000 298 290 48.1 25.9 17.4
200000 250000 327 318 52.6 28.7 18.9
300000 368000 371 363 59.7 33.1 21.2
GAS CARRIER
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 2480 71 66 11.7 5.7 4.6
2000 4560 88 82 14.3 7.2 5.7
3000 6530 100 93 16.1 8.4 6.4
5000 10200 117 109 18.8 10.0 7.4
7000 13800 129 121 20.8 11.3 8.1
10000 18900 144 136 23.1 12.9 9.0
15000 27000 164 154 26.0 14.9 10.1
20000 34800 179 169 28.4 16.5 11.0
30000 49700 203 192 32.0 19.0 12.3
50000 78000 237 226 37.2 22.8 12.3
70000 105000 263 251 41.2 25.7 12.3
100000 144000 294 281 45.8 29.2 12.3
FERRY
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 1230 67 61 14.3 5.5 3.4
2000 2430 86 78 17.0 6.8 4.2
3000 3620 99 91 18.8 7.7 4.8
5000 5970 119 110 21.4 9.0 5.5
7000 8310 134 124 23.2 10.0 6.1
10000 11800 153 142 25.4 11.1 6.8
15000 17500 177 164 28.1 12.6 7.6
20000 23300 196 183 30.2 13.8 8.3
30000 34600 227 212 33.4 15.6 9.4
40000 45900 252 236 35.9 17.1 10.2
PASSENGER VESSEL
DWT DT Loa LPP W D Full Draft
(Metric tones) (Metric tones) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m)
1000 1030 64 60 12.1 4.9 2.6
2000 1910 81 75 14.4 6.3 3.4
3000 2740 93 86 16.0 7.4 4.0
5000 4320 112 102 18.2 9.0 4.8
7000 5830 125 114 19.8 10.2 5.5
10000 8010 142 128 21.6 11.7 6.4
15000 11500 163 146 23.9 13.7 7.5
20000 14900 180 160 25.7 15.3 8.0
30000 21300 207 183 28.4 17.8 8.0
50000 33600 248 217 32.3 21.7 8.0
70000 45300 278 243 35.2 24.6 8.0
Note:
- All the vessel data listed here are taken from PIANC Working Group 33 of Maritime Navigation Commission with
confidence limit of 75%.
- Values shown are for reference only.
COATING THICKNESS
Mils Microns
1 25.4
AREA
Sq. Meter (m2) Sq. Feet (ft2) Sq. Inch (in2)
1 10.7639 1550.0
0.0929 1 144.0
0.645x103 6.9444x10-3 1
VELOCITY
m/s ft/s knot km/h mile/h
1 3.2808 1.9438 3.6000 2.2369
0.3048 1 0.5925 1.0973 0.6818
0.5144 1.6878 1 1.8520 1.1508
0.2778 0.9113 0.5400 1 0.6214
0.4470 1.4667 0.8690 1.6093 1
MASS
tonne (metric) Kip Long ton Short ton
1 2.2046 0.9842 1.1023
0.4536 1 0.4464 0.5
1.0161 2.24 1 1.12
0.9072 2.0 0.8929 1
FORCE
kN tonne (force) kip (force) pound (force)
1 0.102 0.225 225
9.81 1 2.2046 2204.6
4.45 0.454 1 1000
ENERGY
kNm or kJ tonne-m ft kip
1 0.102 0.774
9.81 1 7.24
1.36 0.138 1
PRESSURE
tonne/m2 kip/ft2 kPa psi Kg/cm2 MPa or N/mm2
1 0.205 9.81 1.4236 0.1000 0.00981
4.88 1 47.9 6.944 0.4880 0.04788
0.102 0.0209 1 0.1451 0.0102 0.00100
0.7024 0.144 6.89 1 0.0702 0.00689
10 2.05 98.1 14.236 1 0.0981
102 20.91 1000.62 145.207 10.2 1
LIST OF REFERENCE
BS 6349: Part 4: 1994, Maritime structures, Code of practice for design of fendering and mooring systems
Port Engineering - Volume 1 - Per Bruun KUBO K. (1962):"A New Method for Estimation of Lateral Resistance of
Piles", Report of Port and Harbour Research Institute, Vol. 2, No, 3, 37 p 9 (in Japanese)
Technical Standards for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan (1991): The overseas Coastal Development Institute
of Japan, pp.156-161
UEDA S, K. TAKAHASHI, S. ISOZAKI, H. SHIMAOKA, S. KIUCHI and H. SHIRATANI (1993), "Design Method of
Single Pile Dolphin Made of High Tensile Steel", Proc. Of Pacific Congress on Marine Science and Technology
(PACOM '93) 1993.6, pp 446-475
ROM 0.2 - 90, Actions in the Design of Maritime and Harbor Works, April 1990
PIANC WG 24 (1995): Criteria for Movements of Moored Vessels in Harbours - A Practical Guide, supplement to
Bulletin No.88, 35p.
UEDA S. and SHIRAISHI S. (1992), On the Design of Fenders Based on the Vessel Oscillations Moored in Quay
Walls, Technical Note of Port and Harbour Research Institute, 55p (in Japanese)
PIANC, Report on the International Commission for Improving the Design of Fender System, Supplement to
Bulletin No. 45(1984).
PIANC 2002, Guidelines For the Design of Fender Systems: 2002, Report of Working Group 33
THORESEN C.A, Port Design, Guidelines and Recommendation, Tapir Publishers, Trondheim, Norway, 1988.
SHIGERU UEDA, RYO UMEMURA, SATORU SHIRAISHI, SHUJI YAMAMOTO, YASUHIRO AKAKURA and
SEIGI YAMASE, Statistical Design of Fenders, Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering
Conference, June 2001, pp. 583-588
Technical Standards and Commentaries for Port and Harbour Facilities in Japan, 2002
The Overseas Coastal Area Development Institute of Japan.
DISCLAIMER
Information contained in this catalogue is for general reference purposes only. The information is provided by
Bridgestone and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations
or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or
availability with respect to the catalogue or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on
this document for any purpose. Readers are advised to seek Bridgestone’s confirmation on the specification.
Bridgestone reserve the rights to modify and change the information with or without prior notice.
www.bridgestoneindustrial.com