STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN REPORT

OF
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING OF
CLIENT NAME, 6'KA'BHARATPUR
CHITWAN

SEPTEMBER, 2020

Designed by: Er

NEC NO:- CIVIL “A”

 Table of Contents
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................2
1.1. General........................................................................................................................2
1.2. Data and Assumptions.................................................................................................2
1.3. Design Loads................................................................................................................3
1.4. Materials Properties....................................................................................................4
2. Analysis and Design of Structure........................................................................................5
2.1. Finite Element Modeling.............................................................................................5
2.2. Load Pattern..............................................................................................................11
2.3. Mass Source...............................................................................................................11
2.4. Seismic Loads3293.8541...........................................................................................12
2.5. Model participating mass ratios................................................................................12
2.6. Center of Mass And Center of rigidity.......................................................................13
2.7. Load Combinations....................................................................................................13
2.8. Analysis Results.........................................................................................................14
2.9. Beam and Column Design..........................................................................................29
2.10. Foundation Design.................................................................................................29
2.11 Staircase Design.........................................................................................................29
2.12 Slab Design.................................................................................................................29
3. Conclusion and Recommendation....................................................................................29
4. Annexes.............................................................................................................................30

1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1.General
The structure is three and storey covered storied RC framed Residential building. The
building is regular in plan and elevation.

1.2.Data and Assumptions

Building Type : Residential Building
Location : Bharatpur Mahanagarpalika -8 Gaurigunj
Plinth Area : sq.ft.
Total Area : sq.ft.
Building Shape : Regular
Type of Structure : RCC Framed Structure
Stories : 3 Story + Stair Cover
Story Height : +
3.048 m
Total Height : 12.192 m
Soil Type : Type II Medium Soil (IS 1893_Part 1: 2002)
Seismic Zone Factor, Z : 0.36
Importance Factor, I : 1
Response reduction factor, R : 5
Seismic coefficient, Ah : 0.09
Column Size : 300 mm X 300 mm

Tie Beam: 230 mm X 300 mm

Beam size : First Floor Beam : 230mm X 350mm
Second Floor and Roof Beam : 230 X 350 mm

Slab Thickness : 125 mm

Live Load in Rooms : 2 KN/m2
Live load in Passage : 3 KN/m2
Live load in Staircase : 3 KN/m2
Live load in Roof : 1.5 KN/m2
Reinforcement grade for main bars : Fe 500
Reinforcement grade for stirrups : Fe 500
Grade of Concrete : M20 for all structural concrete
Fundamental time period of building : 0.489 sec
Soil Bearing Capacity : 130KN/m2 (Assumed as per NBC 205 Table 3.1)

1.3.Design Loads
Live Load (Based on IS 875_Part 2: 1987):

2
 Rooms : 2 kN/m2

Passage : 3 kN/m2

Staircase : 3 kN/m2

Roof : 1.5 kN/m2

Dead load (Based on IS 875_Part 1: 1987):

Unit weight of Brick : 19 kN/m3

Unit Weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Earthquake Load (Based on IS 1893: 2002 part 1):

Figure 1-1 IS 1893: 2002 Response Spectrum

Assumptions:

Importance factor, I = 1
Response Reduction Factor, R = 5
Soil Type = Type II (Medium soil)

1.4.Materials Properties
Grade of concrete : M20

Grade of Steel for main bars : Fe 500

Grade of steel for stirrups : Fe 500

Unit weight of Concrete : 25 kN/m3

Unit Weight of Steel : 78.5 kN/m3

Unit weight of brick masonry : 19.2 kN/m3

Young’s modulus of concrete, E :

Poisson’s ratio for concrete : 0.2

3
Poisson’s ratio for steel : 0.3

4
2. ANALySIS AND DESIGN OF STRUCTURE
2.1.Finite Element Modeling
Finite element model has been prepared in ETABS 2017. Beams and frames were modeled
as frame element while slabs were modeled as shell element. Material properties and loads
were assigned as mentioned above. Rigid diaphragm for concrete slab was assigned at each
floor level. Figure shows the finite element model of the building, modeled with ETABS
2017 software.

Figure 1-2 Finite element model of the building in ETABS 2017

Preliminary dimension of the structural elements are as follows:

5
Column Size:
300 mm X 300 mm
Beam Size :
Tie Beam: 230 mm x 300 mm
Main Beam:
 First floor Beam : 230 mm x 350mm
 Second Floor Beam : 230mm X 350 mm
Slab thickness: 125 mm
Stair slab Thickness : 150 mm
Brick masonry wall: 230 mm and 125 mm

6
Figure 1-3 Finite element Plan model of the building in ETABS 2017

7
Figure 1-3 Framing plan of building

8
Figure 1- 4 Live Load

9
Figure 1-5 Wall load

10
2.2. Load Pattern

Self
Name Type Weight Auto Load
Multiplier
Dead Dead 1
Live<3 Live 0
WALL Superimposed
0
LOAD Dead
Superimposed
FF 0
Dead
IS
EQX Seismic 0
1893:2016
IS
EQY Seismic 0
1893:2016
WATER
Live 0
TANK
Superimposed
SDL 0
Dead
SLL Live 0
ROOF LIVE Roof Live 0

2.3. Mass Source

Load Pattern Multiplier

Dead 1
Live=<3 0.25
WALL LOAD 1
FF 1
WATER TANK 1
SDL 1
SLL 0.25

11
 2.4.Seismic Loads
TABLE: Auto Seismic - IS 1893:2016
Period Weight Base
Load Type Direction Ecc. Z Soil I R Used Coeff Used Shear
Pattern     %   Type     sec Used kN kN
0.489 0.09 1658.785
EQx Seismic X 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

0.489 0.09 1658.785

EQx Seismic X + Ecc. Y 5 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

0.489 0.09 1658.785

EQx Seismic X - Ecc. Y 5 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

0.489 0.09 1658.785

EQy Seismic Y 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

0.489 0.09 1658.785

EQy Seismic Y + Ecc. X 5 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

0.489 0.09 1658.785

EQy Seismic Y - Ecc. X 5 0.36 II 1 5 149.2906

2.5.Model participating mass ratios

Period
Case Mode UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.476 0.8297 0.0025 0.8297 0.0025
Modal 2 0.467 0.0037 0.8157 0.8334 0.8182
Modal 3 0.377 0.0049 0.0298 0.8383 0.848
Modal 4 0.202 0.0747 0.0109 0.9131 0.8589
Modal 5 0.186 0.0131 0.0743 0.9262 0.9332
Modal 6 0.144 0.0152 0.0057 0.9414 0.9389
Modal 7 0.127 0.0002 0.0347 0.9416 0.9737
Modal 8 0.126 0.0333 0.0019 0.9749 0.9755
Modal 9 0.111 0.0048 0.0022 0.9797 0.9777
Modal 10 0.096 0.0158 0.0014 0.9954 0.9791
Modal 11 0.094 0.0005 0.0209 0.9959 1
Modal 12 0.084 0.0041 4.869E-06 1 1

The first three modes contribute at least 65% mass participation factor in each principal plan
direction

2.6.Center of Mass and Center of rigidity

12
 Mass X Mass Y XCM YCM XCR YCR
Story Diaphragm
kg kg m m m m
FF D1 58682.76 58682.76 3.9514 7.9911 4.0068 7.5983
SF D2 56518.49 56518.49 3.9981 7.9733 4.04 7.6284
TF D3 41168.79 41168.79 3.9836 5.993 4.0728 6.8688
ROOF D4 10739.41 10739.41 2.0321 8.9281 2.5468 8.3399
2.7.Loa
d Combinations
Different load combinations are made as per IS code and critical one is selected for
design of the member.

Load Combination for Concrete Design: (As per IS 1893:2016)

 1.5DL
 1.5 (DL + LL)
 0.9 DL + 1.5EQX
 0.9 DL - 1.5EQX
 0.9 DL + 1.5EQY
 0.9 DL - 1.5EQY
 1.2 (DL + LL + EQX)
 1.2 (DL + LL - EQX)
 1.2 (DL + LL + EQY)
 1.2 (DL + LL - EQY)
 1.5 (DL + EQX)
 1.5 (DL – EQX)
 1.5 (DL + EQY)
 1.5 (DL – EQY)

2.8.Analysis Results

13
Figure 2-1 Sample Bending Moment Diagram of grid-1

14
Figure 2- 2 Sample Bending Moment Diagram of grid-2

15
Figure 2- 3 Sample Bending Moment Diagram of grid-3

16
Figure 2- 4 Sample Bending Moment Diagram of grid-4

17
Figure 2- 5 Sample Bending Moment Diagram of grid-5

18
Figure 2- 6 Sample Shear force Diagram of grid-1

19
Figure 2- 7 Sample Shear force Diagram of grid-2

20
Figure 2- 8 Sample Shear force Diagram of grid-3

21
Figure 2- 9 Sample Shear force Diagram of grid-4

22
Figure 2- 10 Sample Shear force Diagram of grid-5

23
Figure 2- 11 Longitudinal reinforcement of grid-1

24
Figure 2- 12 Longitudinal reinforcement of grid-2

25
Figure 2- 13 Longitudinal reinforcement of grid-3

26
Figure 2- 14 Longitudinal reinforcement of grid-4

27
 Figure 2- 15 Longitudinal reinforcement of grid-5

Story response plots

28
Figure 2-13 Story response plot for eqx

29
 Figure 2- 14 Story response plot for EqY

TABLE: Story Drifts            

30
Story Load Case/Combo Direction Drift Label X Y Z
          m m m
ROOF EQx 1 X 0.000847 7 3.8862 10.9728 12.192

ROOF EQx 2 X 0.000897 7 3.8862 10.9728 12.192

ROOF EQx 3 X 0.000843 6 3.8862 6.8834 12.192

ROOF EQy 1 Y 0.000851 3 0 10.9728 12.192

ROOF EQy 2 Y 0.00086 7 3.8862 10.9728 12.192

ROOF EQy 3 Y 0.000888 3 0 10.9728 12.192

TF EQx 1 X 0.001113 11 7.239 10.9728 9.144

TF EQx 2 X 0.001199 11 7.239 10.9728 9.144

TF EQx 3 X 0.001028 11 7.239 10.9728 9.144

TF EQy 1 Y 0.000989 3 0 10.9728 9.144

TF EQy 2 Y 0.000946 3 0 10.9728 9.144

TF EQy 3 Y 0.001031 3 0 10.9728 9.144

SF EQx 1 X 0.001149 30 7.239 -0.7366 6.096

SF EQx 2 X 0.001076 25 7.239 16.0274 6.096

SF EQx 3 X 0.001295 30 7.239 -0.7366 6.096

SF EQy 1 Y 0.001049 22 0 16.0274 6.096

SF EQy 2 Y 0.001012 22 0 16.0274 6.096

SF EQy 3 Y 0.001086 22 0 16.0274 6.096

FF EQX 1 X 0.00088 14 7.239 0 3.048

FF EQX 2 X 0.000856 12 7.239 14.8082 3.048

FF EQX 3 X 0.000987 14 7.239 0 3.048

FF EQY 1 Y 0.000834 4 0 14.8082 3.048

FF EQY 2 Y 0.000805 4 0 14.8082 3.048

FF EQY 3 Y 0.000864 4 0 14.8082 3.048

0.001959
MaxStoreyDrift = < 0.004 OK

31
 2.9. Beam and Column Design
Reinforcement output of Beam and Column from Etabs 2017 are attached in Annex.

2.10. Foundation Design

Based on assumed bearing capacity of soil, foundation sizes and reinforcement were
calculated using the CSI SAFE 2016.

2.11 Staircase Design

Staircase is not modelled in the ETAB 2017 Model. Detailing of reinforcement and depth of
waist slab is calculated in MS EXCEL. Manual design is attached in Annex.

2.12 Slab Design

Slab design was prepared separately in MS-Excel. Manual design is attached in Annex.

3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Analysis and design of the residential building was prepared based on IS Codes. For analysis
and design ETABS 2017 software was used. Whenever was necessary to check ETABS result,
manual calculations were also performed. M20 grade of concrete and Fe500 grade rebar
were used for analysis and design. Seismic analysis and design was performed based on IS
1893:2016 for concrete. For detailing of reinforcement SP 34 and Ductile detailing Code IS
13920:2016 were used. The building was designed to meet the required performance level
expected by of IS Code for Residential building purpose.

We greatly recommend using standard quality of construction materials and regular

supervision during construction by the qualified Engineer.

32
4. ANNEXES
Annex1: Foundation Design

Annex2: Slab Design

Annex3: Column Design

Annex4: Beam Design

Annex5: Staircase Design

33