Criteria Exemplary (4) Satisfactory (3)
The introduction clearly The introduction fairly
Preliminary and successfully explains
the reason why the
Material (15%)
research is worthy of
investigation.
The body of the research
report has a clear
Body of Research
hierarchical structure. Its
(60%) format shows a strong
logical relationship among
the different ideas.
All supplementary
Supplementary materials listed reinforce
the presentation, exceed
Materials (15)
the requirement, and are
expertly incorporated.
The research report shows
mastery of writing
mechanics and
Mechanics (10%) conventions (spelling,
punctuation, grammar
usage, and agreement).
Developing (2)
The introduction slightly
attempts to explain the
reason why the research is
worthy of investigation.
The body of the research
report used a clear
hierarchical structure with
most of its main points. Its
format implies a
relationship among the
different ideas.
Most of the supplementary
materials listed adequately
reinforce the presentation,
meet the requirement, and
are well-incorporated.
The research report has
some errors in mechanics
and conventions (spelling,
punctuation, grammar
usage, and agreement).
Beginning (1)
The introduction does not
attempts to explain the
attempt to explain the
reason why the research is
reason why the research is
worthy of investigation.
worthy of investigation.
The body of the research
The body of the research
report used an
report does not use a clear
organizational structure
organizational structure.
that is not consistent to the
The format makes it
development of the main
unintelligible for readers to
points. Its format makes it
recognize and interpret the
difficult for readers to
relationship among
recognize the relationship
different ideas.
among different ideas.
Some of the
supplementary materials No supplementary
listed are only somewhat materials were used.
used or not clearly applied.
The research report has The research report does
distracting errors in not follow proper
mechanics and mechanics and
conventions (spelling, conventions (spelling,
punctuation, grammar punctuation, grammar
usage, and agreement). usage, and agreement).
 Criteria Exemplary (4)
The presentation was
exemplary and beyond
ORAL expectation. The students’
PRESENTATION expression was
grammatically accurate and
no grammatical errors were
Delivery, Fluency,
made. The presenter uses
Correctness Vocabulary, & precise words for the
Pronunciation situation. Pronunciation
was accurate all throughout
(30%) the presentation with good
rhythm and intonation.
ACCURACY & All important objectives are
UNDERSTANDIN identified. Exemplary
understanding of the
G CONTENT presented issue(s) by
thoroughly and correctly
The student is able to addressing the relevant
content, identifying and
demonstrate content
addressing the key
(factual) knowledge and
concepts or main ideas,
understanding of material
and substantiating points
addressed in question.
with several accurate
The oral presentation
examples. All of the points
includes all points listed in in the presentation were
the assignment. well presented in a
(30%) proficient manner.
The presentation used
contains visual aids that
help the audience
understand the work;
visuals have a neat and
Technology and
professional look, easily
Visual Aids (30) understood; used well to
make points Visual aids
reinforce the presentation,
exceed the requirement,
and are expertly
incorporated.
Satisfactory (3) Developing (2) Beginning (1)
The presentation has
The presentation was difficulty in comprehension
There is a little evidence in
satisfying. The explanation and explanation were no
was grammatically correct. very interesting. Some
the presentation. Errors
with comprehension and
The presenter used words signs of fluency such as
grammar are very visible.
that are appropriate to the pronunciation, rhythm and
Mispronunciations were
discussion. Pronunciation intonation were having
noticeable. Vocabulary was
was good as well as the inaccuracies. Some words
inadequate for the
rhythm and intonation. used were appropriate to
discussion.
the topic.
The presenter barely
The presenter correctly touched the relevant
Major objectives are not
addressed the most critical content, poorly identifying
identified in the
content, identify the key and addressing a key
presentation. Insufficient
concepts or main ideas, concept or main idea, not
information and key
substantiating some points substantiating points with
concepts are not identified.
with accurate examples. relevant or accurate
Oral presentation does not
Most of the points in the examples. Only or two of
reflect understanding of the
Manuscript were included the points in the research
content.
in the oral report. were missed in the oral
report.
The presentation used
contains visual aids that It contains few or
are neat, easily inadequate visual aids or
understood; used well to visual aids have a neat and It contains no visual aids or
make points Visual aids professional appearance, visual aids are poorly
reinforce the presentation, but poorly used in making constructed.
exceed the requirement, points. Some parts are not
and are expertly clearly applied.
incorporated.
 The presenter wears
Posture and Attire complete formal attire that
exemplary fits the defense
(10%) and stand confidently and
gracefully on the front.
The presenter wears The presenter wears an The presenter wears
accurate attire and stand attire that somehow fits the uniform and stands not
presentably. defense. presentably.